ASSESSMENTS

Recall

Candidate describes
elements of the
assessment that
went well AND
poorly.

Candidate describes
elements of the
assessment that
went well OR
poorly.

Candidate loosely
describes elements
of the assessment
that went
well/poorly.

Candidate
superficially
describes elements
of the assessment
that went
well/poorly.

Candidate does not

describe elements
of the assessment
that went
well/poorly.

Incomprehensible.
Rationalization

Candidate provides
specific examples
of what to do
differently in the
instruction by
relating it to
elements AND
outcomes of the
assessment.

Candidate provides
specific examples
of what to do
differently in the
instruction by
relating it to
elements OR
outcomes of the
assessment.

Candidate loosely
describes examples
of what to do
differently in the
instruction by
relating it to
elements/outcomes
of the assessment.

Candidate
superficially
describes examples
of what to do
differently in the
instruction by
relating it to
elements/outcomes
of the assessment.

Candidate does not

describe examples
of what to do
differently in the
instruction by
relating it to
elements/outcomes
of the assessment.

Incomprehensible.
Reflectivity

Candidate uses
specific evidence
from the
assessment to
support what steps
will be taken in the
next lesson.

Candidate uses
specific evidence
from the lesson
plan instruction to
support what steps
will be taken in the
next lesson.

Connected to
research AND
theory.

Connected to
research OR theory.

Next steps are

loosely supported
by evidence,
research, or theory.

Next steps are

superficially
supported by
evidence, research,
or theory.

Next steps are not

supported by
evidence, research,
or theory.

Incomprehensible.