Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Benjamin C. Brittain
University of Richmond
Demographics
Deep Run high school is located in the affluent West End of Henrico County, Virginia.
The school houses a 9th-12th grade comprehensive secondary education program consisting of
approximately 1,600 students. The number of students enrolled in each grade level ranges from
379-451with an average of 409 students per level. The student body is 54% male, 46% female,
78% white, 22% total minority and 4% economically disadvantaged. The school boasts a high
record of academic achievement through state standardized test performance (98% pass rate in
reading and 88% in mathematics) and through the high rate of enrollment in Advanced
Placement courses (41.56%). Further, Deep Run has a 97% attendance and on-time graduation
3rate; data indicates these rates to be similar across all of the schools student subgroups.
Key Data Findings
Discipline reports were retrieved from the PowerSchool school management database for
the time period beginning August 31, 2015 and ending November 19, 2015. The reports provide
the type of disciplinary infraction, the number of infractions, the sex of the student involved, the
grade level of the student and the race of the student (see figures 1 and 2 below). Visual analysis
was used to identify trends in disciplinary infractions and attendance codes were determined to
have the highest rate of incidence. The following findings are of interest:
1. Attendance- Excessive indicates students have been tardy three or more times to
school at the beginning of the day.
2. Attendance- Leaving w/o Perm indicates that a student left a classroom, the
building or school property without permission, regardless of whether the student
later returned to the classroom, building or school property.
3. While there are a higher number of white students than minority students who
committed attendance infractions, the ratio is congruent with the schools overall
demographic data.
4. The data indicates that 70% of the attendance violations were committed by males
and 30% by females. This statistic is not consistent with the distribution of truancy
demographics found in other studies (Sharples, 1979 & Puzzanchera, et. al, 2003) and
is likely the result of the relatively small data set.
5. Att-Leaving w/o Perm (skipping), has a heightened rate of incidence with 11th grade
students as compared to other grade levels and is distributed relatively equally
between males and females. Of further interest is that this data is consistent with a
1985 survey conducted in the United States which focused on discerning variations in
student skipping behaviors in the high school setting. The research indicated that
skipping was most frequent among 11th and 12th grade students (Duckworth &
deJung).
Figure 1
Figure 2
attendance rates fell back to previous levels, with the exception of the lowest attending student
population. With this group, attendance levels fell even further than prior to the implementation
of the reward program. A variation of this model, where students receive rewards for attending
class, could be implemented to discourage skipping school or a particular class. A more focused
program could also be implemented for habitual offenders.
Strategy 2: 1 to 1 Truancy Program
A program initiated in 1980 in a Tennessee school district was designed for students who
were consistently skipping class or school. These students were sent to a separate school where
they would spend one-on-one time with a teacher to complete make-up work from their regular
school classes. Most of the students would leave the program and return to the regular setting
within two weeks; some students would even return and be ahead of their peers. These students
were also less likely to fall back into attendance issues than students who did not attend the
alternative placement (Sentelle, 1980). The program highlights the notion that one-on-one
teaching initiatives can boost attendance rates and academic achievement. A similar program,
implemented and housed within the school, could aid in the prevention of skipping. The
infrastructure for such a program is partially in place in most school buildings, currently being
operated as in school suspension.
Strategy 3: Change Schedule of Consequences
Following the work of B.F. Skinner, a 1978 study conducted by Capaldi, confirmed
previous findings that delays in reinforcement and consequences significantly impact the speed
of acquisition of learning. Further, he found that a shorter delay in reinforcement or
consequences greatly increased the likelihood that a behavior is learned. In essence, Capaldi
demonstrates that a delay in consequences results in a lack of learning, whereas a quick response
makes learning more likely. As such, decreasing the amount of time between a student leaving
without permission and the related consequence increases the likelihood that a student will learn
from that consequence and decrease the likelihood that the student will skip again.
Impact/Feasibility Chart
Strategy
Reward Student Attendance
1 to 1 Truancy Program
Change Schedule of Consequences
Impact
Medium
High
High
Feasibility
Medium
Low
High
Teachers
Students
Classrooms
Administratio
n
Implementation Indicators
Implementing an Expedited Schedule of Consequences
Taking attendance within the first ten minutes of the class period
Making sure that attendance codes are entered correctly
Submitting a referral by the end of the class period for students who
leave class and do not return
Know the consequences for skipping
Hall passes utilized at all times, without exception
Attendance policy posted
Sign-out/sign-in sheets
Follow up on attendance referrals within one school day
Follow up on system generated skipper reports within one day of
release
References
Capaldi, E. (1978). Effects of schedule and delay of reinforcement on acquisition speed. Animal
Learning & Behavior, 6(3), 330-334. Retrieved from
http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03209622
Chao, M., Dehejia, R., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Visaria, S. (2015). Unintended negative
consequences of rewards for student attendance: Results from a field experiment in
Indian classrooms. SSRN Electronic Journal SSRN Journal. Retrieved from
http://iems.ust.hk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/IEMSWP2015-22.pdf
Duckworth, K. & DeJung, J. & National Institute of Education (U.S.). (1986). Variation in
student skipping: A study of six high schools. Eugene, Or: Center for Educational Policy
and Management, College of Education, University of Oregon. Retrieved from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED267503.pdf
Puzzanchera, C., Stahl, A.L., Finnegan, T.A., Tierney, N., Snyder, H.N. (2003). Juvenile court
statistics 1998. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile ERIC
Resource Center www.eric.ed.gov. Justice and Delinquency Prevention, National Center
for Juvenile Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/193696/home.html
Sentelle, S. P. (1980). A helping hand for the chronic truant. Educational Leadership, 37(6), 471472. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/63708014?accountid=14731
Sharples, B. (1979). Patterns of school attendance in Ontario elementary and secondary schools.
Ontario Government Bookstore, 880 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M7A 1L2.
Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/63678143?accountid=14731