Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
SINGAPORE
Academy of Medicine
Singapore
College of Family
Physicians, Singapore
Singapore Medical
Association
Chapter of Infectious
Disease Physicians
College of Physicians,
Singapore
Chapter of Respiratory
Physicians
College of Physicians,
Singapore
Contents Page
1 Tuberculosis transmission and pathogenesis
3 Imaging in tuberculosis
5 Treatment of tuberculosis
12
15
16
10 Appendix 1
17
Introduction
This is the executive summary of the MOH Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)
on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis. It is intended to be
used with reference to the full version of the CPG, which is freely available on
the MOH website at this link:
https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/healthprofessionalsportal/doctors/gu
idelines/cpg_medical.html
Target audience
The target audience is all healthcare practitioners in Singapore. These guidelines
aim to
1. Increase knowledge and awareness of tuberculosis as to facilitate the
early detection of active tuberculosis
2. Serve as an evidence-based resource to provide guidance on the use of
tuberculosis diagnostic tools and treatment regimens
3. Inform regarding the public health measures necessary for the control
of tuberculosis control in Singapore
b.
3
3
Levels of evidence
Level
Type of Evidence
1++
1+
Well conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk
of bias
1-
2++
High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies. High quality case
control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high
probability that the relationship is causal
2+
Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias
and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal
2-
Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a
significant risk that the relationship is not causal
Expert opinion
Grades of recommendation
Grade
A
D
GPP
Recommendation
At least one meta-analysis, systematic review of RCTs, or RCT rated as 1++ and
directly applicable to the target population; or A body of evidence consisting
principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population, and
demonstrating overall consistency of results
A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target
population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or
Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+
A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target
population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or
Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++
Evidence level 3 or 4; or
Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+
Good Practice Points: Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience
of the guideline development group.
4
4
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
GPP
24
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
Grade A,
Level 1+
26
Grade D,
Level 4
26
Grade B,
Level 2++
26
GPP
26
Grade D
Level 4
27
No.
2
5
5
No.
7
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
Grade D,
Level 3
27
Grade D,
Level 3
28
Grade D,
Level 3
32
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
*Grade D,
Level 4
36
3. Imaging in tuberculosis
No.
Recommendation
10
11
GPP
Grade D,
Level 4
38
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
12
Grade B,
Level 1++
43
6
6
No.
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
GPP
44
Grade A,
Level 1++
45
Grade D,
Level 4
Grade B,
Level 1+
Recommendation
14
15
16
45
46
*Grade A,
Level 1++
Grade D,
46
Level 3
7
7
5. Treatment of tuberculosis
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
GPP
50
19
GPP
50
20
GPP
50
Grade A,
Level 1++
51
9-month regimen
For patients who are unlikely to tolerate pyrazinamide
(e.g. the elderly, those with liver disease), a 9-month
regimen comprising ethambutol, rifampicin and isoniazid
for 2 months followed by rifampicin and isoniazid for 7
months may be used.
Grade A,
Level 1+
51
No.
Recommendation
Initiation of treatment
18
22
8
8
Grade B,
Level 2+
52
No.
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
Grade A,
Level 1+
53
Grade D,
Level 4
53
Grade B,
Level 1+
53
Grade C,
Level 2+
54
Grade C,
Level 2+
54
Grade D,
Level 4
55
Grade D,
Level 3
55
Musculoskeletal tuberculosis
24
25
26
27
28
30
9
9
No.
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
31
Grade D,
Level 3
56
Grade D,
Level 3
56
32
Hepatic disease
33
*GPP
Grade D,
Level 4
57
HIV co-infection
34
Grade A,
Level 1++
58
35
Grade D,
Level 4
58
36
Grade D,
Level 4
58
10
10
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
Grade C,
Level 2+
63
GPP
64
GPP
64
40
Grade D,
Level 4
65
41
Grade D,
Level 4
66
42
Grade D,
Level 3
67
Grade D,
Level 3
68
No.
Recommendation
Monitoring of patients on tuberculosis treatment
37
38
39
11
11
No.
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
44
Grade D,
Level 4
68
Grade D,
Level 4
69
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
Grade D,
Level 3
70
Grade D,
Level 3
71
48
Grade C,
Level 2+
71
49
Grade D,
Level 4
72
45
Recommendation
12
12
No.
Recommendation
50
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
Grade C,
Level 3
72
Grade D,
Level 4
75
52
76
53
Grade D,
Level 4
76
Grade D,
Level 4
76
Grade D,
Level 4
77
54
13
13
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
56
Grade B
Level 2++
80
Grade D,
Level 4
81
GPP
81
Grade A,
Level 1+
83
Grade A,
Level 1+
84
Grade C,
Level 2+
84
Grade C
Level 2+
84
57
58
60
61
62
14
14
Recommendation
Grade,
Level of
evidence
CPG
Page
No.
63
Grade C,
Level 2+
85
Grade C,
Level 2+
86
87
Grade B,
Level 2++
88
Grade C,
Level 2+
88
Grade B,
Level 2++
88
Grade D,
Level 4
88
64
65
66
67
68
69
15
15
16
16
1. General
a)
b)
c)
2.
b.
c.
17
17
4.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
18
18