Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Meets Minimum
Requirements
(D) 10.5-15/30
Meets Expected
Standards
(C) 15-19.5/30
Exceeds Expected
Standards
(B) 19.5-22.5/30
Spelling and
Grammar
/3
Word
Choice/Diction
/4
Reappropriation of
Poetic Context
/3
Organisation
and
Development of
Technical
Elements
/3
Reflection
Creativity
/3
Spelling/grammar are
average quality, with
intermittent errors that
affect the reading process of
the piece in a minor way.
1.5-2/3
Some strong words and
descriptions. Some above
average word choices
however, many words are
used inappropriately.
2-2.6/4
Mostly avoids clich,
however the odd clich is
found here and there. Style
begins to appear more
polished.
1.5-2/3
A grasp of both contexts is
somewhat evident, however
far from clearly established.
1.5-2/3
This poem shows basic
understanding of both
technical elements and how
their usage changes with
context. 1.5-2/3
Writing is extremely
creative. Ideas and style is
refreshing and imaginative.
Talented writing.
>2.25/3
This text clearly repurposes
the original context of the
poem and in doing so
provides new commentary
on the original text. >2.25/3
This poem balances the
technical elements of the
original and new contexts,
and has organized these in
a way that provokes
thought about the issues
raised. >2.25/3
Deconstruction
and analysis of
text
/8
Styling Reflects
a Reflective
Piece
/4