Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ex 5.1 Aspen Plus
Ex 5.1 Aspen Plus
Exercise 5.1
Obtain by regression the NRTL parameter for water/ethanol mixture in Example 4.1, using
the experimental data reported or others. Answer the follow questions:
a) Result of the regression: include the parameters obtained, values and deviation
(some cells could be extra)
Experimental
368,65
362,65
359,85
358,45
357,25
355,85
355,45
354,65
353,85
352,95
352,85
352,45
351,89
351,39
351,3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Exp Val
TEMP
Est Val
TEMP
Exp Val
PRES
N/sqm
Regressed
368,243755
361,324895
359,631903
358,28547
356,861641
355,472209
355,078078
354,313532
353,683516
352,840753
352,759519
352,415355
351,856051
351,568105
351,30116
Exp Val
MASSFR
AC X
ETHANO
L
Exp Val
MASSFR
AC X
WATER
Std. Dev.
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,1
Exp Val
MASSFR
AC Y
ETHANOL
Difference
-0,406245072
-1,32510481
-0,218096621
-0,164530158
-0,388359391
-0,377791456
-0,371922009
-0,336467939
-0,166484318
-0,109246543
-0,0904812789
-0,0346449414
-0,0339486187
0,178105344
0,00116009909
Est Val
MASSFR
AC Y
ETHANOL
Exp Val
MASSFR
AC Y
WATER
%Difference
-0,110198039
-0,365394956
-0,0606076479
-0,0459004487
-0,108708017
-0,106165928
-0,104634128
-0,0948732382
-0,0470494045
-0,0309524132
-0,0256429868
-0,00982974646
-0,00964750881
0,0506859455
0,000330230314
Est Val
MASSFR
AC Y
WATER
Exp Val
MASSFR
AC Y-X
ETHANOL
Exp Val
MASSF
RAC YX
WATER
368,65
368,24
101325
0,0472
0,9528
0,3437 0,3568498
0,6563 0,6431502
0,2965
-0,2965
362,65
361,32
101325
0,1657
0,8343
0,6196
0,3804
0,376847
0,4539
-0,4539
359,85
359,63
101325
0,2147
0,7853
0,6654 0,6680429
0,3346 0,3319571
0,4507
-0,4507
358,45
358,29
101325
0,2654
0,7346
0,6943 0,7004572
0,3057 0,2995428
0,4289
-0,4289
357,25
356,86
101325
0,3374
0,6626
0,726 0,7325409
0,274 0,2674591
0,3886
-0,3886
355,85
355,47
101325
0,4381
0,5619
0,7535 0,7630258
0,2465 0,2369742
0,3154
-0,3154
355,45
355,08
101325
0,4743
0,5257
0,7635 0,7718572
0,2365 0,2281428
0,2892
-0,2892
354,65
354,31
101325
0,5544
0,4456
0,7811 0,7898592
0,2189 0,2101408
0,2267
-0,2267
353,85
353,68
101325
0,6269
0,3731
0,8014 0,8063309
0,1986 0,1936691
0,1745
-0,1745
352,95
352,84
101325
0,7252
0,2748
0,8301 0,8329071
0,1699 0,1670929
0,1049
-0,1049
352,85
352,76
101325
0,7346
0,2654
0,8322 0,8358963
0,1678 0,1641037
0,0976
-0,0976
352,45
352,42
101325
0,7745
0,2255
0,847 0,8498195
0,153 0,1501805
0,0725
-0,0725
351,89
351,86
101325
0,8423
0,1577
0,8784 0,8794244
0,1216 0,1205756
0,0361
-0,0361
351,39
351,57
101325
0,8831
0,1169
0,9014 0,9021417
0,0986 0,0978583
0,0183
-0,0183
351,3
351,3
101325
0,9558
0,0442
0,9558 0,9558476
0,0442 0,0441523
0,623153
Ans. I dont understand the difference between the two values of NRTL i.e. NRTL (with
parameters built in Aspen) and NRTL with the new parameters.
c) Does NRTL improve with the new parameters?
Ans. The NRTL and experimental values are almost similar hence there doesnt seem much
improvement.
d) Paste here the plot with experimental values, NRTL with new parameters and
NRTL with original parameters.
369,0
368,5
Exp. y ELV
368,0
Exp. x E LV
367,5
367,0
366,5
366,0
365,5
365,0
364,5
364,0
363,5
363,0
362,5
362,0
361,5
Temperature, K
361,0
360,5
360,0
359,5
359,0
358,5
358,0
357,5
357,0
356,5
356,0
355,5
355,0
354,5
354,0
353,5
353,0
352,5
352,0
351,5
351,0
0,00
0,05
0,10
0,15
0,20
0,25
0,30
0,35
0,40
0,45
0,50
0,55
Mass fraction, WATER
0,60
0,65
0,70
0,75
0,80
0,85
0,90
0,95
1,00
374
Exp. y ELV
Exp. x ELV
T -x IDEAL 1,0 atm
T -y IDEAL 1,0 atm
372
370
368
366
Temperature, K
364
362
360
358
356
354
352
350
0,00
0,05
0,10
0,15
0,20
0,25
0,30
0,35
0,40
0,45
0,50
0,55
Mass fraction, WATER
0,60
0,65
Figure 3. Txy plot for water/ethanol at 1 atm, with experimental data, IDEAL and NRTL property methods.
0,70
0,75
0,80
0,85
0,90
0,95
1,00