Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Acknowledgements
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The City of Barnwell and the Lower Savannah Council of Governments appreciate the
efforts of the stakeholders who participated in the development of this Barnwell Bike and
Walk Friendly Action Plan. Their creativity, energy, and commitment to the future of Barnwell are the driving force behind this planning effort. The Lower Savannah Council of Governments and SCDOT provided funding for this effort and the City of Barnwell provided
staff time. The following citizens, City staff, and other agency and organization members
contributed to the development of Barnwells Bike and Walk Friendly Action Plan.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction...................................................................................... 1-5
Project Setting......................................................................................................................................1 - 5
Plan Development Process................................................................................................................1 - 5
Benefits of Bike and Walk Friendly Communities ............................................................................1 - 6
Bike and Walk Friendly Communities: The 6 Es................................................................................1 - 7
Goals/Objectives for Bike/Walk Friendly Barnwell.........................................................................1 - 1 0
Plan Organization..............................................................................................................................1 - 1 3
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
1 -4 | C hapter 1: I ntroduction
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter Outline:
Project Setting
Plan Development
Process
Benefits of Bike
and Walk Friendly
Communities
Bike and Walk Friendly
Communities: The 6 Es
Goals & Objectives for
a Bike & Walk Friendly
Barnwell
Plan Organization
PROJECT SETTING
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Left: On Bike and on foot field work conducted by the consultant team provided an on the ground perspective of Barnwell.
Right: In November 2011 the consultant team and local organizers conducted a stakeholder workshop to identify needs of the community and set goals for bicycling and walking in Barnwell.
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
The consultant team utilized the League of American Bicyclists Bicycle Friendly Communities
(BFC) program and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Centers Walk Friendly Communities (WFC) program as evaluation tools for Orangeburgs existing conditions. More info on
these resources can be found on the programs websites: http://www.walkfriendly.org/ and BFC:
http://www.bikeleague.org/programs/bicyclefriendlyamerica/communities/
1 http://www.ceosforcities.org/work/walkingthewalk
C hapter 1 : I ntroduction | 1-7
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
The core of the BFC and WFC programs are a balanced approach
to Engineering, Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, and
Evaluation- the Five Es. Each of these categories is scored in the
BFC and WFC program applications through a series of detailed
questions. A community must demonstrate success in each of these
areas in order to be considered eligible for an award. Communities
with significant achievements in these areas receive awards, which
are given at Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum levels.
There is also an honorable mention category for communities that
do not qualify for a higher level of award but have demonstrated
progress towards future success.
For the purposes of this action plan, a sixth E, Equity, is included
in order to fulfill the goals and vision of this plan. This plan has been
developed using the 6 Es approach with an intent to provide
action steps in each arena that the community can take towards
becoming more bicycle and pedestrian-friendly. The Six Es are
discussed in detail below
Urban, rural, and suburban communities throughout the U.S. have
participated in the BFC and WFC programs. There is a growing
interest in using the application processes as benchmarking tools
for communities to enhance, develop, and manage their local
programs. Filling out the BFC or WFC application is an education in
itself, as communities see their strengths and opportunities in each of
these categories.
ENGINEERING
BFC/WFC Communities are asked about what bicycle and
pedestrian facilities have been built to promote cycling and walking
in the community. For example, questions in this category inquire
about the existence and content of a bicycle master plan, the
accommodation of cyclists and pedestrians on public roads, and the
existence of well designed bike lanes, sidewalks, and multi-use paths
in the community. Reviewers also look at
the availability of secure bike parking and
the condition and connectivity of both
the off-road and on-road bicycle and
pedestrian networks.
EDUCATION
The questions in this category are
designed to determine the amount of
education available for pedestrians,
cyclists and motorists. Education includes
teaching cyclists of all ages how to ride
safely in any area, from multi-use paths to
congested city streets, as well as teaching
motorists how to share the road safely with
cyclists. Some things that reviewers look at
are the availability of cycling education
for adults and children, the number of
1 -8 | C hapter 1: I ntroduction
The existing levee trail provides recreation and transportation opportunities for Barnwells residents.
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Encouragement and education programs are important tools for promoting bicycling and walking safety and awareness.
C hapter 1 : I ntroduction | 1-9
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
EDUCATION
ENCOURAGEMENT
9. Goal: Build upon and expand local interest in cycling and walking
9.1. Objective: Plan for senior population who would like to walk; senior population is
increasing
9.2. Objective: Attract retirees/visitors
9.3. Objective: Make cycling attractive/visible
9.4. Objective:Beautify Barnwell
10. Goal: Prioritize Safe Routes to Schools programming
10.1. Objective: Involve schools
10.2. Objective: Establish safe bus drop off point near school to walk from
10.3. Objective: Hagood Avenue: walking school bus opportunity
11. Goal: Enhance Programming and Utilize Local Partners
11.1. Objective: Partner with ESMM local chapter: encouraging activity
11.2. Objective: Partner with Tri County Ladies of Excellence/Churches
1 -1 2 | C hapter 1: I ntroduction
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
ENFORCEMENT
12. Goal: Address motorist speeding issues, especially near the lake
13. Goal: Enhance security and perception of safety of walking and biking routes
13.1. Objective: Provide for visibility on existing and future trails; eyes on the trail
14. Goal: Increase loose animal enforcement: dogs are a danger to bicyclists and
pedestrians
EVALUATION
15. Goal: Track data regarding cost of bus pickup vs. walking and bicycling to schools
PLAN ORGANIZATION
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Chapter Outline:
Existing Conditions
Summary of
Stakeholder Meeting
Comments
Barnwell Bike Friendly
and Walk Friendly
Community Audit
Results
Safety Analysis
Lower Savannah
Region and Barnwell,
SC
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Suitability Analysis
EXISTING CONDITIONS
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
OPPORTUNITY
Figure 2-1: There are many opportunities to connect bicycle and
pedestrian facilities to Barnwell schools.
OPPORTUNITY
Figure 2-2: There are several opportunities to make bicycle and
pedestrian connections with recreational facilities throughout
Barnwell.
OPPORTUNITY
Figure 2-3: Many existing roadways could be improved for
bicyclists and pedestrians by adding sidewalks and intersection
improvements.
CONSTRAINT
Figure 2-4: Lighing and visibility can be a safety issue for
bicyclists and pedestrians in some areas.
CONSTRAINT
Figure 2-5: Maintenance of existing facilities is neccessary in
some areas.
CONSTRAINT
Figure 2-6: Many existing roadways lack adequate facilities
for bicyclists and pedestrians.
ton
Not Surveyed
n
Elle
Observed Sidewalks
and Sidewalk Condition
St
Rd
Y, Good
Rey
n
old
s
Y, Fair
Y, Poor
V
U
No Sidewalk
70
n
Main St
Vk
U
64
BARNWELL
{
n
Un
V
278
SNELLING
so n
Jack
Pa
tte
rs
on
St
St
Schools
n
*
#
Private_Schools
(
!
Public Gardens
k
"
Free Attractions
b
"
Welcome Centers
{
n
Colleges
Libraries
Amtrak
Rivers and Streams
Parks
City Limits
Savannah River Site
ARTS MPO Boundary
COATS MPO Boundary
6 County LSCOG Jurisdiction
0.5
2
Miles
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Figure 2-9: There is a good public distribution of information pertaining to the benefits of
bicycling and walking in Barnwell.
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
oo
Positives
oo Self-guided walking tour with map
oo Community walking events
Figure 2-10: The presence of crosswalks at
many intersections in Barnwell is a engineering
feature that encourages walking.
Negatives
oo Lack of SRTS programs
oo Lack of adult-focused safety campaigns
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Enforcement
Positives
oo Presence of crossing guards near schools
Negatives
oo Lack of targeted enforcement for pedestrian safety
Evaluation
Positives
oo Geographic center of town is considered somewhat
walkable with Walkscore (Figure 2-11)
Negatives
oo Lack of pedestrian counts/surveys and audit tools
SAFETY ANALYSIS
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
2 South Carolinas Highway Safety and Performance Plan FFY2010, (2009) Office
of Highway Safety, SC Department of Highway Safety
3 Alliance for Bicycling and Walking. (2010). Bicycling and Walking in the United
States: 2010 Benchmarking Report.
4 All data presented has been derived from accident data provided by the SC
Department of Public Safety for Barnwell County for years 2007, 2008, 2009, and
partial year, 2010
C hapter 2 : U ser N eeds A nalysis | 2-21
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Figure 2-13: Barnwell County, Bicycle and Pedestrian Crash Locations, 2007-2009
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
The metrics fall into categories of trip generators and attractors but
are further categorized into the criteria of live, work, play, and transit/
roadway quality. The metrics play key roles in influencing bicycle
and pedestrian activity. Table 2-1 describes the metrics used:
Table 2-1: PSA and BSA Metrics Overview
Category
Live
Work
Play
Transportation
and Roadway
Quality
Metric
Population density, vehicle ownership
inventory and journey to work mode
Employment density by job sector and
college enrollment density
Proximity to points of interest and schools
Roadway characteristics
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
State Rd
ke
S-6-160
State Rd S-6-652
Ja
m
Center S
t
e
Elb
r ta
Oak Ln
a
St
State Rd S-6-64
1
Blanton Dr
St
Vaughan St
V
U
ve
a go o d A
Park St
Simms St
70
Ave
n St
ingto
Wash
St
emy
Acad
rD
wy 64 rly Ln
Beve
ma
H
Pine
Pike St
y
State H w
St
Brown
k Dr
n Par
St
Allen St
Lemo
2n
d
St
Carolina
St
Main
Gra
nt
St
Charles
Gilmore St
H
State
St
Shady Ln
Florence St
Church
Clay St
St
St
Cann
a
t
Wall S
St
u gh
St
Perr y
Barwick Rd
eD
Pine
St
St
G at
Robin Rd
Ir ving
St
ow
Will
na
R
te
S-
7
6-
d
ea
ow
l St
Ln
V
U
70
06
Ci r
ave n
n
ry L
n
Wa
Der
Woodmont St
Barnwell
ir
Pa
tte
St
-6dS
at
eh
Marlboro Ave
ie
ch
n St
Richardso
Sta
te
R
lk
t
sS
t
on S
Sa
en
Ow
s
Jack
rs
on
34
0
sC
ck
Di
St
t
Dale S
Bethel St
Clinton
St
d
tron R
Amero
Mcdonald Dr
Cities
St
rry
vd
Che y S t
n Bl
r
a r to
Ber
b
n
u
St N D
way
zalea St
A
m
o
B
4th St
t
S
Rose
Ca
m
el
ia
St
e St
Bomba St
ve
ia A
l
App
Major Collector
Principal Arterial
Br
ya
n
Calhou
n
Ow
e ns
St
in
Virg
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
on
Dr
Byrd St
n
Big
Local
al D
Rd
St
Colony West
Roadways
sp
it
on
S-6-652
Dr
nn
Ca
re
l
nR
nS
Ho
Rey
n
o ld
sR
d
Lake Dr
Libraries
gto
Jac
kso
nS
Ori
t
o le
St
Ma
l l ar
dD
r
Free Attractions
We
llin
{
n
Schools
3rd St
"
Sh
a
Briercliff
Laur
e
Deerwood Rd
Low
es
kR
St
Bla
c
Walnut St
High
V
U
64
!
I
1,000
2,000
Feet
C hapter 2: U ser N eeds A nalysis | 2-29
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Chapter Outline:
Introduction
Recommended
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Network
Project List
Planning Level Cost
Options
INTRODUCTION
Figures 3-5 and 3-6 depict existing and proposed bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. The recommendations included in the figures
are based on the types of bikeways and off-street shared facilities
described below.
Greenways are multi-use paths with exclusive right of way. For
the purposes of this plan, the terms trail and greenway are
considered interchangeable (Figure 3-1).
A sidewalk is a path for pedestrians adjacent to a street and
within the street right of way. Adult bicyclists are generally not
permitted to use sidewalks
A side path is a two-way trail on one side of the road that is
located within the road right-of-way (Figure 3-2).
A connector is a narrow shared-use or pedestrian-only facility
that provides local access to a larger greenway trail or key
destination, usually by connecting a residential area and a larger
trail or park.
C hapter 3 : R ecommended B icycle and P edestrian N etwork | 3-35
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Figure 3-2 Side path: a two-way trail on one side of the road
that is located within the road right-of-way.
Figure 3-3 Shared roadway: indicated by shared lane arrows and are intended to prioritize safe and convenient bicycle
travel on streets that do not have space for bike lanes.
Figure 3-4 Bicycle route: can include traffic calming measures and other treatments on low-speed and residential streets,
which are generally comfortable for cycling without special
bicycle facilities
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
PROJECT LIST
Senior Center
Ellenton St.
From
Dunbarton Blvd.
To
City Limits
Mileage
3.51
Carel Dr.
0.79
Hagood Ave.
0.8
0.66
Total
10.15
To
Calhoun St.
Marlboro Ave.
Palmetto St.
Wellington Rd.
Reynolds Rd.
Hospital Dr.
Reynolds Rd.
Lemon Park Dr.
Bush St.
Allen St.
Oak Ln.
City Limits
Colony W St.
W Wellington Rd.
Veterans Park
Ellenton St.
Side of Road
North
West
North
East
North
West
North
East
South
East
North
Both (mi x2)
Both (mi x2)
West
East
West
From
Forest Dr.
Carolina Ave.
Calhoun St.
Church St.
Palmetto St.
City Limits
Marlboro Ave.
Hagood Ave.
Park Dr.
Lemon Park Dr.
Carolina Ave.
Oak Ln.
Dunbarton Blvd.
Lemon Rd.
Wellington Rd.
Ellenton St.
1.26
0.66
0.47
Mileage
0.66
0.82
0.14
0.09
0.36
0.52
0.27
0.27
0.03
0.1
0.43
1.32
0.86
0.34
0.29
0.41
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Wellington Rd.
Clinton St.
Jackson St.
Camelia St.
Reynolds Rd.
Black Rd.
Hospital Dr.
Reynolds Rd.
From
City Limits
Ellenton St.
City Limits North
City Limits
Marlboro Ave.
Main St.
Over Bridge
East West Rail Trail
Greenway
Black Rd.
Lake Brown
Greenway
South
West
0.26
0.2
East
North
0.09
0.15
Total
7.61
To
Dunbarton Blvd.
Harris Rd.
City Limits South
Jackson St.
Main St.
City Limits
Mileage
2.11
1.76
3.6
1.38
1.59
1.79
Total
12.23
From
Main St.
Allen St.
Main St.
To
Burr St.
Allen St.
City Limit
Total
Mileage
1.48
1.11
1.38
3.97
From
Hagood Ave.
To
Main St.
Mileage
0.88
Main St.
Oil St.
1.83
Calhoun St.
Reynolds Rd.
1.25
Calhoun St.
Fuldner Rd.
1.48
Reynolds Rd.
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Jackson St.
Gilmore St. Bryan
St. Lake Dr.
Church St.
Park St. Lemon
Park Dr. Bush St.
Allen St. Center St.
Main St. Jefferson
St. Washington St.
Vaughan St. Lee St.
Franklin St.
Richardson St.
Jackson St. Clinton
St. Camelia St.
Begonia St.
Apple St. Corley
Heights Richardson
Rd. Virginia Ave.
Georgia Ave.
Georgia Ave.
Virginia Ave.
Fuldner Rd.
Airport Rd. (loop
road)
Dale St. Bethel St.
Amerotron Rd.
Wellington Rd.
Wellington Rd.
1.33
Jones St.
0.11
Hagood Ave.
Greenway
connector
Ammie St.
0.63
Fuller Park
Park St.
1.08
Hagood Ave.
Marlboro Ave.
Allen St.
Dunbarton Blvd
0.35
2.29
Dunbarton Blvd
Ellenton St.
0.78
Ellenton St.
0.38
W Wellington Rd.
Ellenton St.
Greenway
connector
Airport Rd.
Ellenton St.
0.42
0.41
Jackson St.
Marlboro Ave.
0.51
Total
14.04
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Cost Summary
The implementation cost of the projects identified in the Barnwell
Bike and Walk Friendly Action Plan is provided in Table 3-2. Land
acquisition costs are not included within this cost summary table.
Costs are based on recent costs incurred by projects throughout the
region. Final costs may be higher or lower based on costs of labor
and materials at the time of construction. Costs for each facility type
include accompanying pavement markings and signage, based
on number of amenities required per mile, divided to arrive at an
estimate per foot (two-way) for each facility type.
Table 3-2: Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility recommendations
Proposed Greenways/
Shared Use Paths
Corridor
East West Rail Trail
Greenway
Carolina Ave. Ammie
Ave. Path
Jackson St. Marlboro Ave.
Path
West of Jackson St.
Greenway
Clinton St. Path
Ellenton St. Path
Wellington Rd. Path
Lake Edgar A. Brown
Greenway
Total
$632,000
$1,600,000
0.8
$640,000
1.26
0.66
0.47
0.66
$1,008,000
$528,000
$376,000
$528,000
10.15
$8,120,000
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
New Sidewalks
Corridor
Solomon Price Rd.
Calhoun St.
Church St.
Palmetto St.
Wellington Rd.
Marlboro Ave.
Hospital Dr.
Park St.
Lemon Park Dr.
Bush St.
Main St.
Main St.
Ellenton St.
Ellenton St.
Ellenton St.
Colony W St. Colony W
Ln. Lake Dr.
Wellington Rd.
Clinton St.
Reynolds Rd.
Black Rd.
Proposed Bike Lanes
Corridor
Side of
Road
Mileage
0.66
0.82
0.14
0.09
0.36
0.52
0.27
0.27
0.03
0.1
0.43
1.32
North
West
North
East
North
West
North
East
South
East
North
Both (mi
x2)
Both (mi
x2)
West
East
West
0.86
$181,460
$679,400
0.34
0.29
0.41
$71,740
$61,190
$86,510
$268,600
$229,100
$323,900
South
West
East
North
Total
0.26
0.2
0.09
0.15
7.61
$54,860
$42,200
$18,990
$31,650
$1,605,710
$205,400
$158,000
$71,100
$118,500
$6,011,900
Est. Cost @
$15,000/mi
$31,650
$26,400
$54,000
$20,700
$23,850
$26,850
12.23
$183,450
$97,840
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Chapter Outline:
Introduction
Goals of Program
and Policy
Recommendations
Overview of Existing
and Potential Partners
Policy Review
Program
Recommendations
and Policies
Evaluation,
Staffing, and Policy
Recommendations
INTRODUCTION
Research has shown that a comprehensive approach to bicycleand walk-friendliness is more effective than a singular approach that
would address infrastructure issues only.1 Marketing, education, and
evaluation programs and local policies are an essential complement
to bicycle and pedestrian facilities planning, and they address the
Education, Encouragement, and Evaluation, and Enforcement
categories of Bike and Walk Friendly communities. These activities
help to raise the profile and public understanding of facilities
investments, increase walking and bicycling mode share and public
support, and help to create a local culture that values walking and
bicycling.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a set of programmatic and
policy recommendations for education, marketing, and evaluation
efforts that will support the goals of the Barnwell Walk and Bike
Friendly Action Plan. These initiatives can be undertaken by local
agencies and community organizations.
Program concepts were developed by the technical team and
were based on:
Right: Numerous
regional partners,
particularly in the
health arena, could
assist with developing and implementing a Walk and
Bike for Health
campaign, including the local hospital
and medical groups
and the East Smart
Move More Coalitions.
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Key Partners
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
POLICY REVIEW
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
Makes reference to
pedestrian traffic: A
public thoroughfare for
vehicular and pedestrian
travel which provides the
principal means of access
to abutting property, but
not including an alley.
(City Zoning Ordinance
(CZO) p. 1-7) Needs
Improvement
Definition of a street
should include
consideration for
pedestrian and bicycle
traffic and safety.
1.2 Definition of
Sidewalk
Sidewalks have a
hard, smooth surface
(e.g., concrete), with
separation from the
roadway typically
consisting of a curb and/
or planter strip.1
1.3 Definition of
Bicycle
None
None
Inadequate
Inadequate
Bicycles should be
defined as a type of
vehicle requiring its own
specialized facilities
and regulations for safe
operation.
1. DEFINITIONS
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
Consideration
for Pedestrian
accommodations
included in Large-scale
development regulations
(p. 5-27, CZO)
Pedestrian travel is
accommodated and
enhanced by walkways,
traffic signals, crosswalks,
curb ramps, and
amenities such as lighting,
landscaping, and places
to rest (e.g. benches).1
2.2. Bike
accommodations
(bike lanes,
shoulders, racks,
etc) required
during new or
redevelopment
No
No
Inadequate
Inadequate
Pedestrian crosswalks,
not less than ten (10) feet
wide, may be required
in blocks longer than
six hundred (600) feet
to provide reasonable
circulation or access to
schools, playground,
shopping centers,
transportation, and other
community facilities.
(p. 8-5, County Land
Development Regulations
(LDR)) Inadequate
Generally, as traffic
volumes exceed 3,000
vehicles per day and
traffic speeds exceed
25mph, facilities to
separate bicycle and
motor vehicle traffic are
recommended. Multilane roads are typically
more dangerous for
all users because of
the increased traffic
volume, the potential for
higher speeds, and the
additional number of
conflict locations due to
turning vehicles.1
In addition, bicycle
parking helps to promote
bicycling as a viable
transportation option.
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
2.3. Sidewalks
or bike
accommodations
required by
roadway type
No
No
Inadequate
Inadequate
2.4. New
sidewalks, bike
lanes, greenways,
etc., connect to
existing facilities
No
No
Inadequate
Inadequate
No
No
Inadequate
Inadequate
Needs Improvement
Connectivity is an
important consideration
when trying to improve
walking and biking
conditions. New
development should be
required to connect to or
extend existing facilities
bicycle and pedestrian
facilities.
Requiring cross-access
between adjacent
parcels of land is a
great tool for reducing
the amount of traffic
on major roads while
increasing connectivity
for pedestrians, bicycles,
and cars.
Development density
should determine the
length of a block, with
shorter blocks being
more appropriate in
areas of higher density.
Maximum block length in
any situation should not
exceed 800-1000 feet. In
areas with blocks as long
as 800 feet or greater, a
pedestrian and bicycle
path of 6-8 feet in width
should be required, with
an easement of 15-20
feet wide.1
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
No
Inadequate
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
3.2. Maximum
automobile
parking
requirements
defined
No
No
Inadequate
Inadequate
3.3. Bicycle
parking
requirements
No
No
Inadequate
Inadequate
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
3.5. Form-based
or design-based
codes are used
Permitted in Planned
Development District
(CZO, p. 4-39) Needs
Improvement
Barnwell County
Recommendation
Integrating form-based
codes into the building
code and zoning
ordinance allows a
city to define the type
of development they
would like to see in their
community.
This can be a powerful
tool that allows residents
to shape their cities as
they see fit.
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
3.6. Pedestrian
entrances
required on
street frontage
(regardless of
parking location)
3.7. Setback
or build-to
requirements
3.8. Buffer
requirement
between
adjacent
buildings or uses
In general, bufferyard
and street buffer
requirements are a
characteristic of autooriented development
the presence of buffers
severely reduces access
for pedestrians and
bicyclists. Alternatives
such as minimizing
street and land-use
buffer size, allowing
commercial buildings
with 0 ft. setbacks, and
allowing development
without buffers between
compatible land uses
promotes pedestrian and
bicycle connectivity.
Inadequate
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
No specific guidelines
except mixed use
permitted in Planned
Development District
and on upper levels of
Commercial Core zoned
buildings. (CZO, p. 2-2,
2-3) Good, but could use
improvement
No specific guidelines
provided
3.10. Active
ground floor uses
with engaging
architecture
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
3.11. Site
Amenities for
Cyclists and
others (Showers,
Changing areas,
etc)
No
No
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
3.12. Human-scale
lighting (< 15 tall)
required along
paths and in
parking areas
Lighting required in
parking areas, but
no maximum height
requirements (CZO, p.
5-13)
Lighting required in
parking areas, but
no maximum height
requirements (CZO, p.
5-34)
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
Inadequate
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
A good guideline is a
report developed by
the Public Rights of Way
Access Committee called
Accessible Public Rights
of Way: Planning and
Designing for Alterations.
A copy can be found
through the Access
Boards website: (http://
www.access-board.
gov/prowac/alterations/
guide.pdf)
4.2. Minimum
sidewalk width by
context
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
In addition to their
aesthetic value, street
trees can slow traffic
and improve safety for
pedestrians. Trees add
visual interest to streets
and narrow the streets
visual corridor, which
may cause drivers to slow
down.1
Pedestrian crosswalks,
not less than ten (10) feet
wide, may be required
in blocks longer than
six hundred (600) feet
to provide reasonable
circulation or access to
schools, playground,
shopping centers,
transportation, other
community facilities,
or where deemed
necessary. (LDR, p. 8-5)
Needs Improvement
Yes, Pedestrian
Crosswalks - Pedestrian
crosswalks, not less than
ten (10) feet wide, may
be required in blocks
longer than six hundred
(600) feet to provide
reasonable circulation
or access to schools,
playground, shopping
centers, transportation,
and other community
facilities.(CLDR, p. 8-5)
4.4. Mid-Block
Crossings
According to the
ADA: The use of Mid
Block Crossing shall be
discouraged and used
only when diversion to
other crosswalks is unlikely.
The elimination of existing
Mid Block Crossings
shall be a priority of the
designer, since nonintersection pedestrian
crossings are generally
unexpected by the
motorist and unprotected
by a signal or stop
control.2
A better standard is to
reduce the maximum
allowed block-size and
provide pedestrian
crossing provisions at
street intersections,
reducing the need for
mid-block crossings.
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
Inadequate
5.2. Minimum
Shoulder Width
No guidance found
No guidance found
Inadequate
Inadequate
Roadway shoulders
often serve as pedestrian
routes in rural areas. On
roadways with low traffic
volumes (e.g., less than
3,000 Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) volumes),
roadway shoulders
may be adequate
for pedestrian travel.
Also used as shoulder
bikeways, these facilities
should be wide enough
to accommodate both
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Because of typical cross
slopes, however, these
facilities do not typically
meet ADA standards.1
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
5.3. Bicycle
accommodations
at intersections
No guidance found
No guidance found
Inadequate
Inadequate
6. FACILITY MAINTENANCE
6.1. Sidewalk
maintenance
policy
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
No specific guidelines
In required common
open space, upkeep of
landscaped areas and
removing obstacles from
greenways is required.
(CZO, p. 5-3)
Inadequate
Needs Improvement
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
6.3. Vegetation
management
(trimming,
pruning, mowing,
etc)
No guidelines or
regulations found
In required common
open space, upkeep of
landscaped areas and
removing obstacles from
greenways is required.
(CZO, p. 5-3)
Inadequate
Good
6.4. Street
sweeping
schedule
As needed
As needed
Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement
6.5. Pothole
maintenance
Regular maintenance
of roads is important for
pedestrian, bicycle, and
vehicular safety.
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
No specific guidelines/
references
Inadequate
This is an important
step in creating a more
pedestrian and bicycle
friendly community. A
design manual will give
guidelines for bicycle and
pedestrian consideration
in new development.
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
7.3. Complete
No specific guidelines
Street Design
Inadequate
Guidelines for a
variety of contexts
No specific guidelines
7.4. General
and Pedestrian
Connectivity
Requirements
Inadequate
Connectivity is a key
component of a
pedestrian and bike
friendly environment.
Its benefits include:
decreased traffic on
arterial streets, continuous
and more direct routes
for travel by walking
and biking, greater
emergency vehicle
access, Improved utility
connections, easier
maintenance, and
more efficient trash and
recycling pick up.3
Limiting block size and
requiring a minimum
connectivity index are
two tools that can be
employed to promote
connectivity. More info
on these measures can
be found here: (http://
congestion.kytc.ky.gov/
connectivity/WSDOT%20
Connectivity%20
Model%20Ordinance.pdf)
7.5. Existence of
street hierarchy
plan by context
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
7.6. Existence
None cited
of bicycle and
pedestrian plan(s) Inadequate
None cited
7.7. Consideration
of pedestrian and
bicycle concerns
in Site Planning
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
7.8. Consideration
of pedestrian and
bicycle concerns
and Level of
Service (LOS) in
Traffic Impact
Analyses and
other engineering
studies
No specific guidelines
No specific guidelines
Inadequate
Inadequate
7.9. Traffic
Calming
programs,
policies, and/or
manuals
7.10. Access
management
program or policy
None cited
None cited
Inadequate
Inadequate
Requiring cross-access
between adjacent
parcels of land is a
great tool for reducing
the amount of traffic
on major roads while
increasing connectivity
for pedestrians, bicycles,
and cars.
Inadequate
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Topic
City of Barnwell
Barnwell County
Recommendation
7.11. Sidewalk
retrofit/infill
program or policy
None cited
None cited
Inadequate
Inadequate
Orangeburg and
Barnwell should consider
developing sidewalk
infill and maintenance
program where City staff
periodically inventory
the street network to
identify sidewalk gaps,
and develop strategies,
project prioritization
criteria and funding
for completing these
gaps. Potential project
prioritization criteria
include filling gaps along
key pedestrian routes,
near major pedestrian trip
generators like schools,
and along streets with
high vehicle volumes.1
GUIDELINES AND
REGULATIONS
GUIDELINES AND
REGULATIONS
8. ITEMS REVIEWED
8.1. Names of
Resources
Barnwell County
City of Barnwell Land
Development Regulations Comprehensive Plan
(2007)
(2010)
Barnwell, SC CBD Master
Plan (2006)
City of Barnwell Zoning
Regulations (2009)
REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
Easley, SC Pedestrian
and Bicycle Master Plan:
http://www.bikeeasley.
com/Pedestrian-BikePlan/
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Sample Programs:
Partners for Active Living Walk to School Day Program
(Spartanburg, SC): http://www.active-living.org/Walk-toSchool-Day.html
Atlanta Charter Middle School Safe Routes Travel Plan
(Atlanta, GA): http://www.atlantachartermiddle.com/
content/safe-routes-school.php
Walking School Bus and Park and Walk Programs (Windsor, VT):
http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/data-central/success-stories/
windsor-vermont-parent-volunteers-lead-walking-schoolbuses-forward
http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/data-central/success-stories/
windsor-vermont-parent-volunteers-lead-walking-schoolbuses-forward
Ira B. Jones School Walking to School Program (Asheville, NC):
http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/data-central/success-stories/
asheville-north-carolina-encouraging-walking-and-wheelingschool-wide
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Bicycling and trail maps encourage walking and biking by providing route and facility information and highlighting walking and bicycling destinations. These should be kept up to date and made readily available to the public.
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
Sample programs:
Sample program:
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
Sample program:
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
More Information:
Communities receive Bicycle Friendly Community awards by demonstrating their commitment to bicycling
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012
B A RN W E L L | S O U TH C A R O L I N A
B ICY CLE AND W ALK FRI ENDLY COMMU NI TY ACTI ON PLAN | 2012