Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Phil1250
March22,2016
SignatureAssignment1
Myers
AgainstDroneWarfare
Analysis,DiagramandResponse
Themilitaryhasbeenconstantlycreatingwaystomakewarsaferforthesoldiersfightingit.One
solutiontothisissue,andmostdefinitelythebiggest,isdrones.Byusingthebestintoday's
technology,themilitaryhavecreatedmachinescapableofwagingwarwithoutriskinglives.
Dronewarfareisawidelydebatedtopicofwhetheritshouldbeallowedornot.Thefollowing
argumentisoftheopinionthatdronewarfareshouldnotbepermittedandthatthe
consequencesofusingitoutweighthelivesthatitprotects.Inwhatyouareabouttoread,Iwill
beanalyzinganargumentagainstdronewarfare.Iwillbebreakingtheargumentdowninto
eachofitspremisesandsubarguments,thendiagrammingtheargument,identifyingsome
unstatedwarrantsandassumptions,andofferinganoverallevaluationandresponse.
Issue:
ShouldDroneWarfarebepermittedinUSmilitaryaction?
ConclusiontoArgument:
Noitshouldnot.
BurdenofProof:
Inthecaseofthisargument,wecansimplyapplytherulethattheonewhomadetheclaimhas
theburdenofprovingit.However,theburdenofproofmaydifferbasedontheaudiencethatthe
argumentistargeting.Forinstance,iftheargumentwasproposedinapoliticaldebatewhere
thegeneralconsensuswasthatDroneWarfarewaswrongandshouldnotbeallowed.If
someoneelsethereweretoprovideacounterargumentagainstitbeingtheoutlierwithinthe
audiencewouldthangivethemtheburdenofproof.Forthesakeofargumentanalysis,Iamthe
audience.Thereforetheburdenfallsthetheonesmakingtheclaimthatdronewarfareshould
notbepermitted.
OutlineofArgument
Conclusion:
DroneWarfareshouldnotbepermittedinUSmilitaryaction.
Premises:
1.
Dronewarfareencouragesperpetualwar.
A. Droneuseviolatesinternationallawinpakistan.
a.
Pakistanmakesdroneuseillegal,yettheUScontinuestousethem.
B.
USexploitscountrieslackofdifference.
a.
PakistancantshootdownUSdroneforfearofrepercussions.
b.
UStakesadvantageofcivilwarinYemen.
1
.TheUSaretheonlyoneswithdronesinYemen.
C.
Collateraldamagemoretoleratedincounterterroristops.
D.
DronesareunethicalandviolateJustWarTheory.
a.
Causemoreciviliancasualtiesthanofficialsadmit.
b.
Obamamakesnewruleswithexceptionofcertaindroneareas.
2.
UseofDronesincreasecollateraldamage.
A. Causethedeathofinnocentcivilians.
a.
TheGuardiankilled1,106unintendedtargets.
B.
Destroyimportantbuildingsandstructures.
b.
61%ofstrikesdestroyedbuildingsincluding132homes.
ArgumentResponse
Premise1,subpremiseAa
Inthestatement,Pakistan,forexample,haspassedlawsillegalizingdroneusewithintheir
country...dronestrikeshavebeenconductedinSomaliaandYemenaswell,thereisthe
presumptionthatSomaliaandYemenhavealsomadedronestrikesillegal.Ifthisisnotthe
casethanthefactthatdronestrikeshavebeenmadeinothercountriesisirrelevanttothe
argumentthattheUSareviolatingUNlawbyattackingthem.Furthermore,statingthatthe
amountofdronestrikeshaveincreasedsinceObamahasbeeninofficeholdsnoweightin
supportingtheargument.Thefactthatdronestrikeshaveincreasedcouldverywellbeagood
thing,sincethesubjectoftheireffectivenessisnotdiscussed.
Premise1,subpremiseBb1
Inthestatement,TheUSseemstobetakingadvantageofthedisruptioncausedbyYemens
civilwar,thereisthepresumptionthatweknowthesituationofYemenandtheoutcomeof
theircivilwar....theUSistheonlycountryusingarmeddronesinYemen.Whatdoesthecivil
warhavetodowithourdronesbeinginthecountry?Regardlessofthestatethatthecountryis
in,theyareathreattonationalorinternationalsecurity.Ifwewereattackingforthesakeof
conquest,expansionorpersonalgainthanitmaybedifferentandbemoreaquestionof
moralitythanpolitics.However,sincethedronestrikesarecarriedoutwiththeintentionof
nationaldefenceandpeacekeeping,thefactthatweareattackingduringorafteracivilwaris
irrelevant.
Premise1
Thepremise,dronewarfareencouragesperpetualwarfareisagreatidea.OnethatIcould
fullygetbehindifIweregivenenoughevidence.Theargumentgivesmanyreasonswhythe
useofdronesislessthanhonorable.However,itneveractuallyexplainswhydroneusewould
causewartobecomeperpetual.Inwhatwayshaveothercountriesretaliated?Arethewaywe
usedronesanymoreinfuriatingtotheenemythanothermeansofinvasion?Warhasalways
beenandmostlikelyalwayswillbeperpetual.Theuseofdroneshasnotchangedthefact
thathatredbegetshatred.