Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PAGE | 2
Table of Contents
Introduction
Research Methodology
Brand Ambassadors
Projected Impact
Conclusion
10
References
11
Appendix
12
PAGE | 3
Introduction
Baseball is one of Georgia Techs most successful sports programs. However, this sport has a very
small audience that attends home games. The key to bridging the gap between the success of the
sport and the low attendance is introducing a brand ambassador program which will revamp the
Georgia Tech Athletic Associations social media strategy for its baseball accounts. According to 2015
home baseball game attendance statistics published by the NCAA, Georgia Tech ranks 46th for
average attendance at home games, far behind attendance numbers for schools with similarly
successful Division 1 baseball programs (see Appendix 1).
Brand ambassadors will create a vested interest in the success of the baseball team among social
media followers by developing a relationship between the followers and the athletes on the team.
This, in turn, will lead to more interest from the student body to connect with the baseball team both
through attending the games and engaging online. Implemented as part of a social media strategy,
brand ambassadors will effectively provide the perfect opportunity for students to engage with the
baseball team (MainPath). Jos van Dijck, author of The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of
Social Media, asserts that platforms such as Facebook and Twitter facilitate users desire to make
connections and exchange self-generated content. The rise of social media indicates that interaction
and connectivity are highly valued to the average user.
Connectivity and interconnectivity in social media add significant value to the effectiveness of a
brand ambassador social media program. Once a user engages in a social media platform, they
become instantly connected to a hub of other users, be it friends, family, colleagues, or even just
people who share similar interests, such as fans of a sports team. Each of these connections is also
connected to a hub of other users, leading to a massive network, thus showing the power of social
media. This connectivity is further strengthened by the interconnectivity of social media platforms.
For example, a single Instagram post can be simultaneously shared to Facebook and tweeted on
Twitter. This interconnectivity allows for enormous levels of traffic to be circulated between different
social media sites at an incredible pace (Hesdin). However, this potential for reaching many viewers
and circulating content can only be achieved through interaction on social media. Users who simply
scroll through their social media feed that do not contribute do not expand viewership. Thus,
interaction with the users and creating a conversation is very important. The Georgia Tech Athletic
Association can leverage these concepts of interaction, connectivity, and interconnectivity to more
effectively target and engage the Georgia Tech student body by introducing brand ambassadors.
PAGE | 4
Research Methodology
Both primary and secondary sources were used to collect information used in this report. The
secondary sources used include scholarly articles, published reports, and web articles surrounding
the topics of social media engagement, interconnectivity, and brand ambassadors. The primary
sources of information include surveys of attendees at Georgia Tech home baseball games and pulling
data through the analysis of official social media accounts for Georgia Tech baseball, comparable ACC
baseball programs, and potential brand ambassadors.
Conducting primary research by surveying attendees at baseball games showed that most attendees
are family and friends of the athletes on the Georgia Tech Baseball team, or in other words, people
with relations to the athletes and with vested interests in the baseball teams success. There were a
minimal amount of students in attendance, all of whom claimed to be there for free t-shirts and
giveaways. Georgia Tech students made up approximately 7% of attendees. In addition, of all
attendants surveyed, only 18.18% followed Georgia Tech Baseball on any social media site. From this
survey, it is clear that there is significant room for improvement in increasing student attendance at
baseball games as well as followership on social media.
Analyzing the social media accounts for the Georgia Tech Baseball team showed that the Twitter
account had the most followers at 15,100, while the Facebook and Instagram accounts had 8,104 and
4,461 followers respectively. Looking at schools with similar baseball programs and normalizing for
the amount of followers they had on their social media site relative to Georgia Techs undergraduate
student body population, it is clear that other schools have a much larger social media follower base.
These results are outlined in the table below:
15100
8104
4461
12641.1
4678.9
Clemson University
34365.7
--*
24243.2
University of Miami
30736.7
39197.2
23313.0
PAGE | 5
Analyzing the current Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram sites of the baseball teams at Georgia Tech,
Clemson University, Florida State University, and the University of Miami lends the following chart of
engagement.
As seen by this chart, Georgia Techs social media engagement is outperformed by other schools
engagement in nearly all social media sites. Nevertheless, the material difference between other
schools and Georgia Tech is not in the rate of engagement but rather in the volume of followers.
The correlation between social media followership, social media engagement, and attendance is
demonstrated through the table below. Social media followership was observed through the stated
number of followers on each official social media account. Social media engagement was calculated
by averaging the number of likes, shares/retweets, and comments on the 25 most recent posts on each
social media site of the baseball teams (see appendix 3). The data pulled has been normalized to
account for Georgia Techs undergraduate student body size and each number has been adjusted
accordingly.
Adjusted Followership
Twitte Faceboo
Instagra
r
k
m
Georgia Tech
15100
8104
4461
Twitte
r
0.195
%
Engagement
Faceboo
Instagra
k
m
1.157%
5.374%
Adjusted
Attendanc
e
Attendanc
e
Multiplier
1459
1.00
PAGE | 6
19830
12641
4679
Clemson University
34366
--
24243
University of Miami
30737
39197
23313
0.168
%
0.193
%
0.205
%
0.919%
6.522%
1906
1.31
--
6.602%
3616
2.48
2.510%
6.567%
3417
2.38
It can be clearly seen that Clemson University and the University of Miami would have the highest
number of followers, high engagement rates, and also more than twice the number of attendees at
home baseball games if they had the same student body size as Georgia Tech. This provides
additional evidence that social media followership and engagement both impact attendance. As such,
student attendance at Georgia Tech Baseballs home games is likely to be positively correlated with
the reach and ability to engage of their social media strategy.
Brand Ambassadors
A brand ambassador is a person that represents an organization or company in such a way as to cast
the brand in a positive light. By doing so, they help to increase brand awareness. Ideally, the brand
ambassador is meant to embody the identity of the brand in appearance, demeanor, values and
ethics. For the purpose of increasing engagement on social media for the Georgia Tech Baseball team
and increasing student attendance at home games, three areas to recruit possible brand ambassadors
have been chosen: current players on the Georgia Tech Baseball team, former Georgia Tech Baseball
players that are playing professionally, and from within student organizations on campus.
Projected Impact
Aristotle once argued that the whole is worth more than the sum of its parts. As it relates to
implementation of a Brand Ambassador program within Georgia Tech Athletics, significant synergies
may be achieved through the collective efforts of the three categories of ambassadors discussed
above. Since the ultimate goal is to facilitate engagement with current students across social media
platforms, the efforts of each category of brand ambassador should complement one another and add
additional value. For example, consider a home game versus the University of Georgia. Current
players post to social media regarding the upcoming game and tag both a student and alumni
ambassador. Suddenly, a single post now finds itself across three different social media profiles. This
provides an opportunity for the respective networks of each ambassador to share the post, like the
post, or even comment. Conversation is then initiated between the ambassadors, eventually
encouraging other players, organizations, and alumni to contribute to the dialogue. As more Yellow
Jackets contribute, word spreads quicker, and awareness and hype for the upcoming game builds.
Additionally, as mentioned above, with the players acting as sponsors to various student
organizations, competitions that are held between the different organizations increases the connection
between the student body and the players. As shown from our initial data, baseball attendance is
driven largely by relationships; developing these, however small, can provide material incentive for
students to come out and see players who they now associate themselves with socially. Additionally,
the synergies from these ambassadors hold the potential to foster boosterism among students. Free
gear is a material incentive to attract students to a single game, but building relationships between
current players, alumni playing professionally, and current students can create allies throughout the
undergraduate body that can drive long-term awareness and, ultimately, attendance. Even as an
PAGE | 9
Conclusion
As highlighted in the data above, Georgia Tech Athletics social media presence lags behind
comparable schools in both reach and engagement. As a potential solution to address these issues,
Brand Ambassadors from the current player, alumni player, and student organization bases can
provide avenues through which to effectively engage undergraduates and foster relationships that
will ultimately lead to increased boosterism and attendance at home games. The three groups of
ambassadors would work in parallel to leverage the reach and effectiveness of their respective social
media presences to initiate conversations with students that both engage and call to action.
Guidelines for each of these categories, as standardized in a sort of operating manual for each
category of ambassador, will serve to maintain continuity, professionalism, and best practices across a
re-engineered social media strategy for Georgia Tech Athletics. As a direct result of successful
implementation of these initiatives, the following can be achieved: an increase in student followership
of GTAA social media accounts to above 40% of the current undergraduate body, a 50% increase in
engagement rates across primary social media platforms, and, ultimately, a 20% increase in home
game attendance by undergraduate students. As highlighted throughout this proposal, successful
engagement through social media centers upon initiating and sustaining a conversation with, and
PAGE | 10
PAGE | 11
References
Baseball Attendance Records. Rep. NCAA. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
<http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/baseball_RB/2016/Attend.pdf>.
Hesdin, Farah. "The Interconnectivity of Social Media." Techxb. 23 Apr. 2013. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
<http://techxb.com/the-interconnectivity-of-social-media>.
MainPath. "The Importance of Interconnectivity in Digital Marketing." MainPath Marketing. 15 Sept.
2015. Web. 24 Apr. 2016. <http://mainpath.com/the-importance-of-interconnectivity-indigitalmarketing/>.
Van Dijck, Jose. "Social Media and the Culture of Connectivity." OUPblog. 25 Feb. 2013. Web. 24 Apr.
2016. <http://blog.oup.com/2013/02/social-media-culture-connectivity/>.
Primary Research conducted through analyzing:
Georgia Tech Baseball Social Media Sites:
https://twitter.com/GTBaseball
https://www.facebook.com/gtbaseball
https://www.instagram.com/gt_baseball/
Florida State University Baseball Social Media Sites:
https://twitter.com/FSUBaseball
https://www.facebook.com/FSUBaseball/
https://www.instagram.com/nolebaseball/
Clemson University Baseball Social Media Sites:
https://twitter.com/ClemsonBaseball
https://www.instagram.com/clemsonbaseball/
University of Miami Baseball Social Media Sites:
https://twitter.com/CanesBaseball
https://www.facebook.com/TheUBaseball/
https://www.instagram.com/canesbaseball/
PAGE | 12
Appendix
1A: 2015 Baseball Home Game Attendance
Team
Dates
Total
Avg.
LSU
39 421,771
10,815
Arkansas
33 273,605
8,291
Ole Miss
26 208,362
8,014
Mississippi St.
31 230,918
7,449
South Carolina
34 250,057
7,355
Texas
23 127,802
5,557
Texas A&M
41 199,119
4,857
Florida St.
37 158,284
4,278
Clemson
28 119,023
4,251
TCU
36 147,335
4,093
La.-Lafayette
26 101,626
3,909
Nebraska
27 105,406
3,904
Texas Tech
27
98,969
3,666
Virginia
23
83,825
3,645
Florida
39 138,441
3,550
Hawaii
29
95,048
3,278
Creighton
28
87,226
3,115
Vanderbilt
33 102,022
3,092
Arizona St.
36 108,510
3,014
Alabama
31
93,047
3,002
Rice
29
84,187
2,903
Oregon St.
28
80,054
2,859
Wichita St.
32
90,907
2,841
Auburn
34
94,834
2,789
Southern Miss.
28
75,847
2,709
Arizona
36
95,946
2,665
Miami (FL)
41 109,256
2,665
PAGE | 13
25
65,766
2,631
Louisville
33
81,205
2,461
Baylor
28
65,631
2,344
East Carolina
33
74,388
2,254
Indiana
25
55,185
2,207
Georgia
29
63,903
2,204
Kentucky
23
47,551
2,067
Tulane
30
61,782
2,059
29
57,951
1,998
Tennessee
24
45,004
1,875
Houston
32
58,648
1,833
Missouri St.
22
38,800
1,764
North Carolina
29
50,075
1,727
Illinois
28
48,207
1,722
Stanford
31
49,648
1,602
Oregon
31
48,833
1,575
West Virginia
22
33,158
1,507
South Ala.
28
42,147
1,505
Georgia Tech
26
37,937
1,459
Oklahoma St.
27
38,384
1,422
Fresno St.
27
38,305
1,419
Texas St.
26
36,565
1,406
Liberty
28
39,334
1,405
Average
30
99,197
3,220
PAGE | 14
29%
36%
Family/Friends
Email
Social Media
Team website
14%
21%
PAGE | 15