Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
information
and
source
of
the
following
presentation,
consider
the
last
paragraph
and
reference.
Whatever
has
the
possibility
of
nonexistence
must
be
caused
to
exist
by
another
because
potentiality
is
not
actuality.
What
is
but
could
possibly
not
be
has
only
a
potential
existence.
It
has
existence,
but
it
also
has
the
possibility
of
nonexistence.
Now
the
causal
possibilities
of
the
very
existence
of
this
potential
existent
are
self-caused,
caused
by
another,
or
uncaused.
But
it
cannot
be
self-caused
since
this
is
impossible.
Neither
can
it
be
uncaused.
If
it
were
uncaused,
than
mere
possibility
would
be
the
ground
of
actuality.
But
nothing
cannot
produce
something.
One
must
conclude,
then,
whatever
has
the
possibility
for
nonexistence
must
be
caused
to
exist
by
another.
Let
us
now
elaborate
the
argument.
First,
by
causality
we
mean
efficient
causality
or
the
actualization
of
a
potential.
A
cause,
then,
is
that
which
effects
a
transition
from
potentiality
to
actuality.
Further,
no
being,
whether
contingent
or
necessary,
can
be
self-caused.
A
self-caused
being
would
have
to
be
prior
to
itself.
It
would
have
to
be
simultaneously
in
a
state
of
actuality
and
a
state
of
potentiality
with
regard
to
being,
which
is
impossible.
Potentiality
is
not
actuality;
nothing
is
not
something.
A
cause
of
being
must
exist
in
order
to
cause
something.
And
what
is
to
be
caused
must
not
exist,
or
else
its
existence
does
not
need
to
be
caused.
Therefore,
in
order
to
cause
ones
own
existence
one
must
simultaneously
exist
and
not
exist,
which
is
impossible.
Second,
a
being
that
could
possibly
not
exist
cannot
be
uncaused.
Its
being
is
only
possible
and
not
necessary.
It
is
not
a
must-be
but
only
a
may-be
that
is.
But
the
possible
is
not
the
actual;
mere
possibility
does
not
account
for
actuality.
The
impossible
cannot
be,
the
possible
can
be,
and
the
necessary
must
be.
The
impossible
can
never
arrive
to
be,
the
necessary
can
never
arrive
to
be
or
cease
to
be,
but
the
possible
can
arrive
to
be
and
cease
to
be.
But
whatever
can
arrive
to
be
must
be
caused
to
be,
for
something
cannot
be
caused
by
nothing;
the
mere
potential
for
being
cannot
actualize
itself.
If
it
is
an
actualized
potentiality,
then
it
either
actualized
itself
or
else
it
was
actualized
by
something
outside
itself.
But
no
being
can
actualize
its
own
existence.
The
actualization
of
a
potentiality
is
what
is
meant
by
causality.
Consequently,
to
actualize
ones
own
potential
for
being
would
mean
to
cause
ones
own
being,
which
is
impossible.
However,
since
the
existence
of
possible
beings
has
actualized,
it
follows
there
is
a
cause
of
existence
outside
them
that
actualizes
their
existence.
In
short,
the
actual
does
not
arrive
from
the
potential
unless
something
outside
it
actualizes
its
potential.
No
potential
can
actualize
itself.
The
potential
for
being
does
not
account
for
the
existence
of
something.
Many
things
that
could
possibly
exist
do
not
exist,
such
as
centaurs,
mermaids,
and
Pegasus.
Why,
then,
do
other
things
that
might
not
exist
actually
exist?
The
only
adequate
explanation
for
why
there
is
something
rather
than
nothing
at
all
is
that
something
that
could
be
nothing
is
caused
to
exist
by
something
that
cannot
be
nothing.
In
brief,
a
necessary
Being
causes
all
contingent
beings.
Whatever
is
but
might
not
be
is
dependent
on
what
is
but
cannot
not
be.
Another
way
to
see
the
need
for
a
Cause
of
all
possible
beings
is
to
analyze
the
very
nature
or
kind
of
existence
it
has.
If
there
were
a
necessary
Being
it
would
be
pure
actuality
with
no
potentiality
in
its
being
whatsoever.
Impossible
beings
have
neither
actuality
nor
potentiality;
they
are
not
and
cannot
be.
But
possible
beings
have
both
potentiality
and
actuality
in
their
very
being.
They
consist
of
co-principles
of
being.
Their
being
is
composed
of
acts
of
existence
and
essence.
But
whatever
is
composed
of
acts
of
existence
and
essence
must
be
caused
to
exist
by
another.
Acts
of
existence
cannot
cause
itself,
and
essence
cannot
cause
acts
of
existence.
What
something
is
does
not
explain
the
fact
that
it
is,
unless
it
is
a
necessary
Being,
whose
very
essence
is
to
exist.
But
it
is
not
of
the
essence
of
a
possible
being
to
exist.
It
is
of
my
essence
that
I
might
not
exist
even
though
I
do
indeed
exist.
Hence,
since
it
is
not
of
my
essence
to
exist
and
since
it
is
only
of
the
essence
of
a
necessary
Being
to
exist,
it
follows
we
must
seek
for
the
ground
or
cause
of
every
possible
being
such
as
me.
There
is
another
way
to
see
the
need
for
a
cause
of
every
contingent
or
possible
being.
An
infinite
and
unchanging
being
must
be
uncaused.
But
there
can
be
only
one
such
being,
for
Pure
Actuality
is
simple
indivisible,
having
no
potentiality
for
division.
Therefore,
every
other
being
must
be
caused
by
another,
since
to
be
self-caused
is
impossible.
Since
I
am
not
a
necessary
Being,
it
follows
I
and
every
other
contingent
being
that
exists
must
be
caused
to
exist
by
a
cause
beyond
me
and
us.
Before
leaving
this
point
we
should
stress
that
all
efficient
causality
of
existence
is
current.
What
is
called
for
is
not
a
cause
for
my
becoming
but
for
my
continued
be-ing.
The
argument
rests
on
conserving
causality,
not
originating
causality.
The
reason
for
this
is
very
simple:
I
am
right
now
a
contingent
being;
it
is
not
that
I
once
was
contingent
when
I
arrived
to
be
but
now
am
not.
Whatever
was
once
contingent
will
always
be
contingent,
for
whatever
can
arrive
to
be
is
not
a
necessary
Being.
A
necessary
Being
cannot
arrive
to
be;
it
must
ever
be
and
may
never
not
be.
This
means
that
whenever
I
am
contingent
and
however
long
I
remain
contingent,
I
will
always
need
a
cause
of
my
existence.
It
is
misleading
to
speak
of
existence
as
though
it
were
something
one
could
get
all
at
once
in
a
package
to
keep
for
the
rest
of
ones
life.
More
properly,
we
should
speak
of
our
existing.
What
we
have
is
not
really
existence
but
a
continual,
moment-by-moment
process
of
existing.
We
do
not
have
being
but
continuous
be-ing.
What
causes
me
to
be
when
I
need
not
be
nor
continue
to
be?
This
is
the
real
metaphysical
question.
All
causality
of
existing
or
be-ing
is
simultaneous
and
current.
The
cause
of
becoming
may
be
before
the
effect,
but
the
cause
of
be-ing
must
be
concurrent
with
the
effect.
The
cause
of
my
here-and-now
existence
must
be
vertical
and
not
linear.
The
artist
is
the
cause
of
the
becoming
of
the
painting
but
not
of
its
continued
being.
The
artist
dies
but
the
painting
continues
to
be.
Likewise,
the
parents
are
the
cause
of
the
arriving-to-be
of
the
child,
but
something
else
must
be
the
cause
of
the
childs
continuing-to-be,
since
the
child
continues
to
exist
without
the
parents.
The
presentation
here
was
influenced
in
large
part
from
a
book
authored
by
Norman
L.
Geisler
on
pages
271
through
273,
which
I
reference
later
in
this
website.