Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Malnutrition impacts 30%-50% of hospitalized adult patients, but only 3.2% of these
patients are diagnosed upon discharge1.
When a Registered Dietitian was exposed to a malnourished patient, only 29% of the
45% were accurately documented2.
There is a developing need for Registered Dietitians to perform and apply the
outcomes from Nutrition Focused Physical Assessments (NFPA) to recognize and
diagnose malnutrition3,4,5.
Among Registered Dietitians there is a lack of training, resistance to touch patients,
and little knowledge of findings causing it to not commonly be included among
Registered Dietitian's nutrition assessments6.
At this time, it is unclear what resources practicing Registered Dietitians and their
respective Managers need to support the implementation efforts of NFPA.
The intent of this research is to better understand the current needs of Aramark
Registered Dietitians and Managers overseeing Registered Dietitians with the
implementation of Nutrition Focused Physical Assessments at their accounts.
METHODOLOGY
A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the current needs of Registered Dietitians and the managers overseeing the Registered Dietitians within Aramark
regarding the implementation and performance of Nutrition Focused Physical Assessment in clinical practice.
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical Registered Dietitian or a manager overseeing Registered Dietitians employed or managed by Aramark
Providing inpatient services
Located at sites participating in the 2015-2016 Aramark Dietetic Internship.
The survey was developed using SurveyMonkey Pro.
The survey was distributed using Electronic Mail.
An Initial question divided out the Managers overseeing the Registered Dietitians to a specific Manager survey.
SurveyMonkey Pro compiled percent (%) responses for each question.
Descriptive Statistics were used to evaluate the data
Microsoft Excel-201l was used to compile the findings and to calculate mean percentages for questions regarding years credentialed, worked for or managed by
Aramark, and Aramark contract length at the facilities.
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Research findings support the need for extensive instructor guided hands-on
training with NFPA.
Barriers include financial implication, time away from work, and travel
requirements. Consistent with what hands-on training workshops would require.
Registered Dietitians and managers understand the importance, the knowledge
behind, and are motivated to learn more about NFPA.
Actually performing the invasive NFPA and interpreting that information into the
appropriate criteria is a problem area, which is consistent with majority of trainings
delivered through webinars, self-study, and written materials since application
would not be involved.
One struggle of NFPA is on obese/overweight patients and on critical patients in
the intensive care units. This is consistent with other studies findings that
performing NFPA on patients in the ICU presents a complex situation due to the
nature of the setting and their fragile condition 5
Limitations
Self-Reported Data
Pilot Study with a small convenience sample
Strength is the ability to quickly assess the needs of Aramark Registered Dietitians
and Managers about NFPA.
CONCLUSION
Results from the needs assessment surveys provide important information about
the current performance and implementation efforts of NFPA.
Barriers exist that are hindering these Registered Dietitians and Managers from
performing, receiving additional training, and to further implement NFPA at their
facilities.
Inconsistencies exist across the Aramark accounts surveyed.
The survey will need to be sent out to the rest of Aramarks registered dietitians
and their respective managers to fully understand what resources or guidance is
needed. Further more, the development of a training program that addresses the
needs for further education, hands-on instruction, and guidance from Aramark.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
RESEARCH QUESTION
What are the current needs of Aramark Registered Dietitians and Registered Dietitian
Managers with the implementation of Nutrition Focused Physical Assessments into clinical
practice?
5.
6.
Field LB, Hand RD. Differentiating Malnutrition Screening and Assessment: A Nutrition Care Process
Perspective. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115(5): 824-829. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jand.2015.11.010.
Gout, B.S., Barker, L.A., & Crowe, T.C. (2009). Malnutrition identification, diagnosis and dietetic referrals: Are
we doing a good enough job? Nutr Diet. 2009; 66: 206211. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0080.2009.01372.x.
White JV, Guenter P, Jensen G, et al. Consensus Statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Characteristics Recommended For The Identification
and Documentation of Adult Malnutrition (undernutrition). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012; 36(3): 275283.
Esper DH. Utilization of Nutrition-Focused Physical Assessment in Identifying Micronutrient Deficiencies. Nutr
Clin Pract. 2015; 30(2): 194-202. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615573054
Fischer M, JeVenn A, Hipskind P. Evaluation of Muscle and Fat Loss as Diagnostic Criteria for Malnutrition.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30(2): 239-248. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615573053. Available from: Sage Journals.
Accessed November 7, 2015.
Speer B, Moore K, DeMage A. Utilization of Nutrition Focused Physical Assessment by Aramark Registered
Dietitians. Aramark Distance Learning Dietetic Internship: Emerging Trends Research Poster Presentation.
2014-2015 term.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Sarah Genton
Brooke Pfest
Sgenton@gmail.com Brookepfest@gmail.com
Ausrine Paulauskaite
Ause.Pau@gmail.com
Template
provided by: posters4research.com