0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
26 vues1 page
This document discusses using an eclectic method and jam sessions as a way to conceptualize communication theory. It argues that communication theory has never been stable due to divisions between different schools of thought. It suggests using jam sessions as a model where disparate elements come together improvisationally to offer temporary theoretical grounding during unsettled times. Jam sessions confront ontological possibilities through improvised reorganization of themes, like piecing together means of transcending turmoil. Five theses are presented: eclecticism requires ethnography; qualitative and quantitative research complement each other; ephemeral details reveal most; experimentation extends beyond empiricism; and excess and exuberance are necessary.
This document discusses using an eclectic method and jam sessions as a way to conceptualize communication theory. It argues that communication theory has never been stable due to divisions between different schools of thought. It suggests using jam sessions as a model where disparate elements come together improvisationally to offer temporary theoretical grounding during unsettled times. Jam sessions confront ontological possibilities through improvised reorganization of themes, like piecing together means of transcending turmoil. Five theses are presented: eclecticism requires ethnography; qualitative and quantitative research complement each other; ephemeral details reveal most; experimentation extends beyond empiricism; and excess and exuberance are necessary.
This document discusses using an eclectic method and jam sessions as a way to conceptualize communication theory. It argues that communication theory has never been stable due to divisions between different schools of thought. It suggests using jam sessions as a model where disparate elements come together improvisationally to offer temporary theoretical grounding during unsettled times. Jam sessions confront ontological possibilities through improvised reorganization of themes, like piecing together means of transcending turmoil. Five theses are presented: eclecticism requires ethnography; qualitative and quantitative research complement each other; ephemeral details reveal most; experimentation extends beyond empiricism; and excess and exuberance are necessary.
Stephen Stockwell, Griffith University, Australia Communication theory as the means to conceptualise the transmission of information and the negotiation of meaning has never been a stable entity. Entrenched divisions between administrative and critical tendencies are played out within schools and emerging disciplines and across a range of scientific/humanist, quantitative/qualitative and political/cultural paradigms. Of course, this is only the beginning of the mischief for there are many other polarities at play and a host of variations within polar contrasts. (Dervin, Shields and Song 2005: 6) .
The free spirit surveys things, and
now for the first time mundane existence appears to it worthy of contemplation (Nietzsche 2001: 6).
This paper argues that the play of
contending schools with little purchase on each other, or anything much, has turned meta-discourse about communication into an ontological maelstrom. Perhaps the only way to ride out this storm is to look towards particular communication practices that, like the Greek symposium, draw together disparate elements to see how their particular theoretical underpinnings may offer safe moorings while the worst of the storm passes by.
From its roots in jazz and blues to its
contemporary manifestations in rap and hip-hop and throughout the communication industries, the improvised reorganisation of traditional themes into new and striking patterns confronts the ontological possibilities in music, and life, by taking the flotsam flung up by the storm to piece together the means to transcend the downward pull into the abyss.
Five theses on theory-jamming and
communication 1. Eclecticism requires Ethnography: the eclectic is the ethnographer loose in their own mind. 2. Enculturation and Enumeration need each other: qualitative and quantitative research work best when they work off each other.
Bibliography
The jam arose as a spin-off of the
dance music circuit in the 1930s. After the main, professional show was over, small groups would gather together in all-night dives for informal, spontaneous sessions of unrehearsed improvisation, playing for their own pleasure, in accordance with their own esthetic (sic) standards. (Cameron 1954: 177). Experimentation is mandatory and formal rules become suspect because they too quickly stereotype and ossify. (Cameron 1954: 181)
5. Extravagance and Exuberance:
dont stop until youve got enough. Theory-jamming opens the possibility for a unified theory of communication that starts, not with a false narrative certainty, but with the gaps in communication: the distance between what we know and what we say, between what we say and what we write, between what we write and what others read back, between what others say and what we hear. Cameron, W. B. Sociological Notes on the Jam Session. Social Forces. 33. Dec, 1954. pp. 17782. Dervin, B. , Shields, P. and Song, M. More than Misunderstanding, Less than War. Paper at International Communication Association annual meeting, New York City, NY, 2005. Nietzsche, F. The Pre-Platonic Philosophers. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001.
3. Ephemera and Esoterica tell us
the most: the back-story is the real story as we stumble on the greatest truths as if by accident. 4. Experimentation beyond Empiricism: more than testing our sense of our sense data of the world. Communication theory extends from infra-red to ultraviolet, from silent to ultrasonic, from absolute zero to complete heat, from the sub-atomic to the inter-galactic.
Jelly Holt and friends jam, 1957
s.stockwell@griffith.edu.au
The intellect must not only desire
surreptitious delights; it must become completely free and celebrate Saturnalia. (Nietzsche 2001: 6).