Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
For integrity:
a)
b)
c)
d)
For competence:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Knowledge of law;
Legal reasoning ability and competence;
Writing and verbal communication ability;
Professional qualities;
Academic accomplishment and professional training;
Professional activities.
Article 42 of the
Constitution
Multinational Georgia
Georgia Small and
Medium Enterprise
Association
Civil Integration
Foundation
Georgian Lawyers for
Independent Profession
Liberal
Center for Protection of
Constitutional Rights
International Society
for Fair Elections and
Democracy
The Union 21 Century
Georgian Young
Lawyers Association
Human Right Center
Transparency
International
Union of Meskhetian
Democrats
Liberty Institute
Civil Development
Agency
United Nations
Association of Georgia
The European Law
Students Association
Civil Society Institute
Open Society Georgia
Foundation
Institute of Democracy
American Chamber of
Commerce
Eurasia Partnership
Foundation
Institute of
Development of
Freedom of Information
Human Rights Priority
Tbilisi Media Club
Human Rights
Education and
Monitoring Centre
Foundation for the
Support of Legal
Education
Institute of Civil
Engagement
Association of law firms
of Georgia
Association of Young
Economists of Georgia
European Choice of
Georgia
Liberal Academy
Georgia
Partnership for Human
Each member of the Council enters scores in the electronic database upon
completion of an interview and provides reasons for each score in writing in
three working days.
Candidates are rated according to the average score calculated by dividing
the total sum of all scores by the number of the Council members. A
candidate shall receive at least 70% of the maximum score for each
criterion.
6. Candidate interviews and the assessment process, as well as assessment
forms are public;
7. The existing voting procedure for appointing judges is annulled. The
candidates with the highest scores will be appointed from the pool of those
who have passed the 70% threshold.
8. A decision by the High Council of Justice to decline a candidate can be
appealed in the Supreme Court Qualifications Chamber according to the
established procedure. The law shall establish a comprehensive list of
grounds for appeal: a biased approach of a Council member in the process of
the competition; a discriminatory approach of a Council member to a
candidate; abuse of power by a Council member, due to which a judicial
candidates rights were violated or independence of the court was
endangered; information, which served as a ground for a decision, is
essentially false and a candidate is able to provide convincing evidence for
proving wrongfulness of this information; a competition was carried out in
violation of procedures established in the law, thereby essentially affecting
competition results.