Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Group 2
Group 2
Group 2
minimum-wage workers.
If a higher minimum wage increases the wage rates of unskilled workers above
the level that would be established by market forces, the quantity of unskilled
workers employed will fall. The minimum wage will price the services of the
least productive workers out of the market. The direct results of minimum wage
legislation are clearly mixed. Some workers, most likely those previous wages
were closest to the minimum, will enjoy higher wages. The ripple effect shows
that when you increase the minimum wage the wages of all others will
consequently increase due the need for relativity. Others, particularly those with
the lowest prelegislation wage rates, will be unable to find work. They will be
pushed into the ranks of the unemployed or out of the labor force. It is also
argue that by increasing the minimum wage, however, the economy will be
adversely affected due to small businesses not being able to keep up with the
need to subsequently increase all workers wages.
A firm's cost is a function of the wage rate. It is assumed that the higher the
wage, the fewer hours an employer will demand of an employee. This is
because, as the wage rate rises, it becomes more expensive for firms to hire
workers and so firms hire fewer workers. This will lead increase unemployment
with the resultant low productivity.
The basic theory says that raising the minimum wage helps workers whose
wages are raised, and hurts people who are not hired (or lose their jobs) because
companies cut back on employment
The argument that a minimum wage decreases employment is based on a simple
supply and demand model of the labor market.
The negative employment effects of minimum wage laws are minimal if not
non-existent if the minimum wage is set close to the equilibrium point.
4
Group 2
Macro-economic concerns
Ideally the work of the national tripartite committee should not be too difficult
advising government and fixing minimum wages and salaries, but unfortunately
in an economy like Ghanas, where the macro-economic indicators are so harsh
it becomes a very difficult undertaking.
With inflation rate hovering around 16.8%, the currency depreciating very fast
against all the major currencies in the world i.e. $1 to 4.30, Unemployment
rate very high, especially skilled labour unemployment coupled with the recent
deregulation of petroleum products will lead to hike in transport fares and
subsequent increase in prices of goods and services, especially foodstuffs.
The cumulative effect of the above is that people are not able to buy the same
quantity of goods they bought previously, thus a reduction in their purchasing
power and negative impact on their incomes, and soon there are agitations for
wage increase by workers.
Agitations by workers, forces bodies like the Trade Union Congress and The
Employers Association to get Government to negotiate on increasing new salary
wage for workers, a situation which not handled well only compounds the
inflationary effects of the economy..
Reports have it that already the government payroll is 53% of total revenue
generated, a situation which is not acceptable and which the IMF wants to be
reduced to 35% to fall in line with the ECOWAS average. It is also believed the
payroll is bloated by a lot of ghost names creating imbalances in the wage bill
Conclusion and Recommendation
How the tripartite committee handles the wage issues will impact either
negatively or positively on the economy. Thus they should ensure any increase
5
Group 2
Group 2