Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Risk Reduction
Background
Company Background
Goal
Financial Impact: Recall Prevention (2012 recall cost was $1.7M for
one incident)
Define
Define
- Needed a metric linked to recall
prevention
- Held a day Define Kaizen
(1) Root cause analysis
- A major product recall
- Other major quality surprises
in the marketplace over the prior
two years
(2) Agree on a valid measure of recall
risk Priority Number as the Metric
Outcome: Use PFMEA Risk
RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Measure
Measure
Team agreed on standard definitions for
Severity, Occurrence, Detection scoring
(example lower left)
Baseline Results
One very high risk process step
(RPN > 500) identified and
addressed (mixing kettle rinse
water handling in one facility)
114 high risk process steps
(RPN > 250) identified
Goal: all RPNs below 250 in 12
months
Analyze
Analyze
Pareto analysis of high risk process steps
revealed four major causes behind high risk
process steps
1. Process requirements (SOPs / standard
work) insufficient methods not defined
2. In cases where requirements were
documented, operator understanding of
process requirements was lacking
3. Critical-to-quality process steps were
not highlighted in any way
Improve
Improve
Process requirements for high risk process
steps reviewed and updated
Training processes put in place requiring
supervisor verification for high-risk process
steps
In some cases, additional process controls
were added to increase chances of detection
RPN values re-assessed as changes were
made, process steps above 250 RPN
reduced from 114 to 37 in nine months
Control
Control
Team developed a Critical Inspection Point
(CIP) Audit
CIP = high risk process step requiring proper
SOP, training, and internal audit
Audits are conducted quarterly and plants
are scored based on nine criteria for each
CIP
Outcomes
Outcomes
Initial CIP audit scores were in the 30% - 50% range for
all plants
After three quarterly audits, plants progressed to the
80% + range
Critical customer complaint count from 42 avg per
month to 19
High risk process steps from 114 to 37
Quarterly CIP audits represent the control phase and will
switch to twice/year when plants reach 95% CIP audit
scores