Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s11738-010-0546-2
ORIGINAL PAPER
Communicated by S. Abe.
M. C. Gor I. Ismail Z. Zainal N. M. Noor R. Othman
Z. A. M. Hussein
School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science
and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
I. Ismail (&) Z. Zainal N. M. Noor R. Othman
Z. A. M. Hussein
Institute of Systems Biology (INBIOSIS), Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
e-mail: maniz@ukm.my
W. A. W. Mustapha
School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology,
Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan
Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Introduction
Plants produce a wide range of secondary metabolites upon
pathogen infection or in response to herbivore attacks
(Namdeo 2007). Some of these bioactive compounds may
have a novel chemical structure that can be used in the
fields of pharmaceuticals, food additives, cosmetics, perfumes, pesticides, dyes, and fine chemicals (Balandrin and
Klocke 1988). To date, most of these secondary metabolites have been isolated from wild or cultivated plants
because chemical synthesis is either extremely difficult or
not economically feasible. However, the lack of reproducible activity for more than 40% of these plant extracts
(Poulev et al. 2003) has led to the limited commercial
success of the plant phytochemical industry. This major
constraint could be overcome with biotechnological techniques to artificially induce the production of secondary
metabolites in in vitro cultures, such as the use of biotic or
abiotic elicitors.
Polygonum minus Huds. was chosen as the suitable
candidate for this study because it contains highly aromatic
123
compounds and is rich in essential oils. P. minus, commonly known as kesum, has been recognized by the
Malaysian government in the Herbal Product Blueprint as
an essential oil-producing crop (Wan Hassan 2007). Only
one previous study has investigated in this species,
reporting that the essential oil from kesum leaves was
found to contain about 76.59% aliphatic aldehydes that
consisted of two dominant compounds, decanal and dodecanal, and contained 0.18% b-caryophyllene, a sesquiterpene (Karim 1987). Although many efforts have attempted
to identify chemical compounds from the leaves of other
Polygonum species, the importance of roots should not be
neglected. Roots of many medicinal plants are often used
as crude drugs because they are capable of accumulating
high levels of secondary metabolites that have medicinal
activities (Yazaki 2001). Not surprisingly, some studies
have successfully identified valuable compounds from
Polygonum roots that possessed medicinal properties.
For example, researchers have found phytoestrogens from
P. cuspidatum and P. hydropiper roots (Matsuda et al.
2001), phytohormones, and anthraquinones from P. multiflorum roots (Yu et al. 2006) and indigo from P. tinctorium
roots (Chae et al. 2000).
P. minus is a species that recently gained the attention of
scientists and this is the first study to investigate secondary
metabolite biosynthesis in its roots at the molecular level.
Plant roots are one of the plant parts that are less studied
and are relatively unexploited compared to shoots. Thus,
the unexplored root exudates, which contain diverse
chemical substances, are a target in the search for novel
bioactive compounds for drug discovery and molecular
farming. The emerging biotechnology using root systems is
gaining interest among scientists because of their ability to
import and export molecules between root cells and the
rhizosphere (Gleba et al. 1999). In addition, roots are
physically unprotected in the soil environment, and as they
are surrounded by many microorganisms, roots may produce a vast amount of biological metabolites that possess
antimicrobial or aromatic properties to ensure plant survival (Poulev et al. 2003). Elicitation of hydroponically
grown roots is thus a strategy that could enhance the production of these metabolites or even new compounds that
are not synthesized in normal growth conditions. The
application of elicitors on plant shoots has serious limitations because the hydrophobic surfaces and impermeable
characteristics of leaves result in low uptake of chemical
elicitors. On the contrary, elicitors can be easily added into
growth media and absorbed by roots and can easily harvest
and screen for bioactive compounds. Roots also contain
low levels of pigments and other compounds found in
leaves, such as tannins, which may interfere in chemical
screening and extraction (Gleba et al. 1999; Poulev et al.
2003).
123
JA elicitation
PCR amplification of cDNA inserts
Approximately 2-month-old in vitro plantlets were used for
JA elicitation. The elicitor was first dissolved in ethanol
(EtOH) and then sterilized by filtration. The in vitro
plantlets were then transferred into jam jars containing
50 ml of the MS liquid medium with 150 lM of JA
(Duchefa, Netherlands). The plantlets were grown hydroponically using the same conditions as described above. At
the same time, control plantlets were grown in an MS
liquid medium without any JA addition to serve as a reference. After 3 days of JA treatment, the roots were harvested, blotted dry and kept at -80C for further RNA
extraction.
Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
The root samples were ground into powder in liquid
nitrogen using mortar and pestle. Total RNA was extracted
from the JA-treated and the non-treated roots following a
previously published method (Pateraki and Kanellis 2004).
Plasmids were extracted using the Montage Plasmid Miniprep96 kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturers
instructions. The cDNA inserts were amplified with M13
forward and reverse primers. A 25 ll PCR reaction was set
up by mixing 14.9 ll of distilled water, 2.5 ll (109) of PCR
buffer, 4.0 ll (25 mM) of MgCl2, 1 ll (10 lM) of each of
the M13F and M13R primers, 0.5 ll (10 mM) of dNTP,
and 0.1 ll (5 u ll-1) of Taq DNA Polymerase (Promega,
USA). The PCR reactions were pre-denatured at 95C for
5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94C for
1 min, annealing at 55.8C for 30 s, and an extension at
72C for 2 min. The final extension was performed at 72C
for 5 min.
Reverse Northern hybridization of cDNA clones
The cDNA probe was randomly labeled with Digoxigenin11-dUTP for both the driver and the tester cDNA
123
123
(Promega, USA). For amplification, samples were predenatured at 95C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of
1 min at 95C, 30 s at 64C, 1 min at 72C, and a final
extension at 72C for 1 min.
Genes
Gene-specific primers
ELI3-1
F: 50 -TGGTGAAAACAATGAAGCCCAACA-30
243
R: 50 -CGATGGACTATGTGAACACCGCAAT-30
ADH
F: 50 -TGGTTCCTGGTAAAAGCCGTTGC-30
212
R: 50 -CCACGGATTATTCCATTGACCCTG-30
F-box
F: 50 -TCCACTGTTGGGAAACTGCCTGA-30
0
R: 5 -CAATGACTCCTTCACCATAAGCCCTG-3
GST
124
0
F: 50 -TCCACCCAAAATCCAACCGAAT-30
235
R: 50 -TCTTGCCCCGAGACCCTTATCA-30
POD
F: 50 -ATGATTGCTTCGTTCGGGGTTG-30
241
R: 50 -CCTGACGGGACATCGTAGCCAA-30
LOX
F: 50 -TCTTCATAAACTCCCACCCAAAATCC-30
99
R: 50 -TAAGGAGTTGGAGGGGAAGAGGTTT-30
SAMS
F: 50 -AACCCATCAGGTCGCTTCGTCA-30
184
R: 50 -AAAGACGGACAACGGCTCAGGG-30
SHH
F: 50 -AACAGGGGCGTCATTATCTTGGC-30
R: 50 -TGGTTGGTGAAGGAGCACGACA-30
Ubi
F: 50 -TTGAGGACGGCAGAA-30
98
446
R: 50 -GAAAGAAACGGAAACATAG-30
123
Size
(bp)
Homology
Organism
Number
of clones
E value
Transcription factor
GR505449
265
Populus tremula
3e-12
GR505460
595
Arabidopsis thaliana
1e-22
GR505470
423
Hordeum vulgare
2e-25
GR505481
298
Coffea canephora
2e-09
GR505492
583
9e-05
8e-06
285
Protein kinase
Malus domestica
1e-55
GR505518
563
Arabidopsis thaliana
3e-48
GR505519
712
Calmodulin-binding protein
Arabidopsis thaliana
7e-116
GR505451
666
Medicago trunculata
2e-18
GR505452
539
Panax ginseng
3e-22
GR505453
503
Arabidopsis thaliana
2e-29
GR505454
589
Auxin-induced protein
Nicotina tabacum
6e-13
GR505455
269
Populus tremula
5e-16
GR505456
267
Populus tremula
3e-05
GR505457
406
Bouteloua gracilis
0.0
GR505458
669
Glycine max
3e-17
GR505459
656
Glycine max
2e-21
GR505461
GR505462
570
716
Lycopersicon esculentum
Zea mays
3
1
3e-10
2e-07
GR505463
747
Anionic peroxidase H
Zea mays
1e-09
GR505464
546
Peroxidase 1
Scutellaria baicalensis
3e-48
Stress-related
Carbohydrate metabolism
GR505465
684
Alcohol dehydrogenase
Prunus armeniaca
3e-68
GR505448
603
Zea mays
1e-75
GR505466
436
b-fructofuranosidase
Arabidopsis thaliana
2e-14
457
S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase
Beta vulgaris
1e-135
GR505468
446
S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase
Actinidia chinensis
2e-29
GR505469
443
S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase
Elaeagnus umbrellata
6e-18
GR505471
741
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase
Mesembrayanthemum crystallinum
0.0
Other metabolism
GR505473
313
Arabidopsis thaliana
5e-06
GR505474
328
Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase 1
Arabidopsis thaliana
3e-20
GR505475
GR505476
460
742
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
1
1
3e-09
4e-49
GR505477
520
Arabidopsis thaliana
2e-05
GR505478
524
Persicaria maculosa
0.0
GR505479
391
Plumbago sp.
6e-163
GR505480
557
Cytochrome c oxidase
Gossypium barbadense
0.0
GR505482
401
NADH dehydrogenase
Beta vulgaris
0.0
GR505483
344
Urate oxidase
Vitis vinifera
1e-20
GR505484
748
Glucan-endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase
Nicotina tabacum
5e-29
123
Size
(bp)
Homology
Organism
Number
of clones
E value
952
Capsicum annuum
7e-47
GR505485
430
Arabidopsis thaliana
1e-41
GR505486
393
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Zea mays
3e-11
399
Lycopersicon esculentum
5e-12
Zea mays
1e-11
GR505472
Energy
Transporter
GR505487
GR505488
291
Auxin efflux carrier protein
Regulation of gene expression
GR505489
377
Fagopyrum esculentum
8e-162
GR505490
675
0.0
GR505491
497
Vitis vinifera
1e-58
GR505493
538
Hypothetical protein
Zea mays
2e-21
GR505494
714
Eristalis tenax
9e-19
GR505495
495
Platynereis dumerilii
2e-68
GR505496
311
Unknown protein
Arabidopsis thaliana
2e-23
GR505497
696
1e-56
GR505450
480
Hypothetical protein
Vitis vinifera
1e-15
GR505498
352
No homology
GR505499
525
No homology
GR505500
GR505501
489
350
No homology
No homology
1
1
GR505502
314
No homology
GR505504
419
No homology
GR505505
634
No homology
GR505506
662
No homology
GR505507
635
No homology
GR505508
644
No homology
GR505509
656
No homology
GR505510
636
No homology
GR505511
637
No homology
GR505512
657
No homology
GR505513
379
No homology
GR505515
541
No homology
GR505516
381
No homology
GR505517
633
No homology
Unknown genes
Novel genes
123
Others
19%
Transcription
factor
8%
Signal transduction
and kinase
5%
Unknown genes
9%
Stress-related
25%
Regulation of
gene expression
2%
Other metabolism
20%
Energy
2%
Amino acid
metabolism
6%
Transporter
2%
Carbohydrate
metabolism
2%
123
JA-treated
samples
non-treated
samples
GR505465 (ADH)
GR505472 (LOX)
GR505467 (SAMS)
GR505471 (SHH)
GR505453 (ELI3-1)
GR505459 (GST)
GR505464 (POD)
GR505460 (F-box)
Ubiquitin 11
123
On the other hand, SAM is also the intermediate molecule in ethylene and polyamine biosynthesis (Ravanel
et al. 1998). Nevertheless, the expression of these two
genes was also shown to be up-regulated in the petunia
flower and they were linked to the production of benzenoid, a compound that contributes to the flowers scent
(Schuurink et al. 2006). Hence, it was believed that the
expression of the SAMS and SHH genes found in this study
was related to the production of phenylpropanoids,
alkaloids, ethylene or polyamine after JA elicitation. The
activated-methyl cycle was predicted to be closely related
to JA signaling and must be further investigated.
Clones encoding the genes related to abiotic stress,
such as glutathione S-transferase (GST), ELI3-1 and
peroxidase (POD) were evaluated to investigate the correlation between JA stress and other stress factors. Both
GST and ELI3-1 demonstrated a type 1 expression pattern. Ten clones were similar to GST in this subtracted
library. GST (EC 2.5.1.18) is a cytosolic enzyme found in
all eukaryotes. This gene is always detected in stressed
plants, such as heavy metal and salt-treated rice seedlings
(Moons 2003), water-stressed maize seedlings (Zheng
et al. 2004), drought-stressed horse gram (Chandra Obul
Reddy et al. 2008) and fungus-elicited rice seedlings
(Xiong et al. 2001). Therefore, and not surprisingly, the
expression of GST was observed in normal kesum roots
because the in vitro culture itself was a stress condition
for kesum plantlets. It was strongly up-regulated in JAtreated roots as a defense mechanism, suggesting an
overlap in the plant responses of plants to various stress
factors. Also, GST catalyzes the conjugation between
synthetic electrophilic compounds and the glutathione
tripeptide (c-glutamyl-cysteinyl-glycine, GSH). The polar
S-glutathionylated product will be actively transported
into the vacuole by an ATP-binding cassette. Thus, GST
is part of the detoxification mechanism in plants. In fact,
it is the main ingredient for a variety of commercial
herbicides (Andrews et al. 2005). Therefore, it is crucial
to investigate kesum as a potential plant for phytoremediation purposes.
ELI3-1 is another gene related to the abiotic stress
caused by JA elicitation that will lead to phytoalexin and
pathogenesis-related protein accumulation, phenolic compound production, and cell wall reconstruction. Seventeen
of the ELI genes were identified in parsley cells cultured
and treated with the Phytophthora megasperma fungus
(Trezzini et al. 1993). In addition, MeJA elicitation has
successfully activated ELI3, TyrDC, HRGP, and BMT
genes in parsley (Ellard-Ivey and Douglas 1996). This
observation proved that the expression of ELI3-1 could
also be induced by JA elicitation.
Peroxidase (POD, EC 1.11.1.7) plays an important role
in the oxidation process, such as in peroxidative or
123
References
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W,
Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new
generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids
Res 25:33893402
Andrews CJ, Cummins I, Skipsey M, Grundy NM, Jepson I,
Townson J, Edwards R (2005) Purification and characterisation
of a family of glutathione transferases with roles in herbicide
detoxification in soybean (Glycine max L.); selective enhancement by herbicides and herbicide safeners. Pesticide Biochem
Physiol 82:205219
Balandrin MJ, Klocke JA (1988) Medicinal, aromatic and industrial
materials from plants. In: Bajai YPS (ed) Biotechnology in
agriculture and forestry. medicinal and aromatic plant, vol 4.
Springer, Berlin, pp 136
Chae YA, Yu HS, Song JS, Chun HK, Park SU (2000) Indigo
production in hairy root cultures of Polygonum tinctorium Lour.
Biotechnol Lett 22:15271530
Chandra Obul Reddy P, Sairanganayakulu G, Thippeswamy M,
Sudhakar Reddy P, Reddy MK, Sudhakar Chinta (2008)
Identification of stress-induced genes from the drought tolerant
semi-arid legume crop horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum
(Lam.) Verdc.) through analysis of subtracted expressed
sequence tags. Plant Sci 175:372384
Chong TM, Abdullah MA, Fadzillah NM, Lai OM, Lajis NH (2005)
Jasmonic acid elicitation of anthraquinones with some associated
enzymic and non-enzymic antioxidant responses in Morinda
elliptica. Enzyme Microbial Technol 36:469477
Craig KL, Tyers M (1999) The F-box: a new motif for ubiquitin
dependent proteolysis in cell cycle regulation and signal
transduction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 72:299328
Creelman RA, Mulpuri R (2002) The oxylipin pathway in arabidopsis. In: Somerville C, Meyerozitz EM (eds) The Arabidopsis
book. American Society of Plant Biologists, America, pp 124
Datta BK, Datta SK, Rashid MA, Sarker SD (2002) Flavonoids from
Polygonum stagninum (Polygonaceae). Biochem Syst Ecol
30:693696
Devitt LC, Sambridge T, Holton TA, Mitchelson K, Dietzgen RG
(2006) Discovery of genes associated with fruit ripening in
Carica papaya using expressed sequence tags. Plant Sci
170:356363
Dewick PM (2001) Medicinal natural products. A biosynthetic
approach. Wiley, England
123
123