Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3d 306
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto
Rico [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
D.Puerto Rico
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Juan Ramon Matta-Ballesteros on brief pro se.
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, and Fidel A. Sevillano Del Rio,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, and SELYA and LYNCH, Circuit
Judges.
Per Curiam.
Matta argues that the district court violated the clear meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P.
41(a)(1)(i) in dismissing his complaint "with prejudice" instead of without
prejudice. Rule 41(a)(1)(i) provides, in relevant part, as follows:
5 action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by filing a
an
notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of
a motion for summary judgment,.... Unless otherwise stated in the notice of
dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is without prejudice,....
6
(emphasis added).
Central del Caribe, Inc. v. Liaison Comm. on Medical Educ., 760 F.2d 14, 19
(1st Cir.1985). See also Manze v. State Farm Ins. Co., 817 F.2d 1062, 1065-67
(3d Cir.1987) (reversing dismissal of claim with prejudice where defendant had
filed a motion to dismiss prior to plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, but
had neither answered the complaint nor moved for summary judgment).
8
The judgment of the district court dismissing the case with prejudice is vacated
and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the case without
prejudice. Costs to appellant.