Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 95-2375
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Defendants - Appellees.
____________________
____________________
Before
_____________________
Blair L. Perry,
________________
with whom
Heidi E. Harvey
_________________
____________________
____________________
Plaintiff-Appellant James
L.
Grubb,
Jr. ("Grubb"
court's grant of
Patriots, L.P.
or
"Plaintiff"),
summary judgment
(the
501.
Grubb's claims
"Patriots"), and
of copyright
district
for Defendants-Appellees
on
challenges the
National Football
KMS
League
(collectively "Defendants"),
infringement under 17
U.S.C.
I.
I.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
of
the
National Football
League,
informed
NFL Properties
on
a logo change
for
design
and publishing
Football League.
Properties
production assignments
for the
National
representatives
on January
27,
1993,
the Patriots
few weeks.
Accordingly,
NFL
independent design
firms.
("Jansen")
Properties
of NFL
On
Properties
contacted
approached
overnight
containing,
similar
courier,
among other
Jansen
things,
sent
Bradley Jansen
Evenson Design
Via
several
to
a purchase
Group
to begin work.
Evenson
package
order and
designs
-2-
Jansen continued to
eventually chose to
of his timesheets,
In his
which were
generated by
a computer
program
not be
backdated,
Loh indicated
Patriots'
new
he had
virtually completed
by February
4,
that as
of that
creating
and
other
logo
that
logos
1993.
revising
Referring to
date he
the
logo
began work
he had
the
his
on
already
Properties.
Representatives of
Patriots
on February
18, 1993.
proposed
logos, including
Loh's.
design to NFL
NFL
Properties
The
Patriots were
The Patriots
met with
the
shown many
selected Loh's
Meanwhile, on
the
February 9, 1993,
having heard
Patriots planned to
through
to the
Patriots' office
in Foxborough,
Massachusetts.
In
his
that
the
Patriots
submission.
would
Grubb holds
contact
him
later
regarding
his
-3-
for his
and
stripes.1
Defendants.
The
district court
profile, stars,
granted summary
judgment to
failed to
part on the
fact that the Patriots established and followed a policy that was
designed
to
prevent designers
outside submissions.
Loh
composed the
design.
Grubb
Patriots'
Loh --
new logo
Loh's work
from seeing
appeal, Grubb
independently of
Grubb's
challenges the
district
argues that
compares
as
In the instant
court's grant of
-- such
his
Supplemental Affidavit,
and his
own, asserts
In particular,
in which
facts that
Grubb
create a
relied.
In the
relative
proportions of
substantially identical
the
elements of
and the
curve of
the
two designs
the base
line .
are
. .
. . .
district court
erred in
crediting Loh's
____________________
-4-
testimony in light
of
II.
II.
Summary
STANDARD OF REVIEW
STANDARD OF REVIEW
judgment is
appropriate when
"the pleadings,
admissions on file,
issue
as to
entitled to
any
material fact
a judgment
as a
and that
the
matter of law."
is no genuine
moving party
Kelly
_____
States, 924 F.2d 355, 357 (1st Cir. 1991); see also
______
________
is
v. United
______
Fed. R. Civ.
P. 56(c).
produce
Under
Rule 56(c),
the opponent
of the
motion must
if
opponent;
granted.
Celotex Corp. v.
______________
317, 323
(1986);
III.
III.
To
prevail on
claim of
plaintiff
must
copyright
infringer.
show two
DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION
elements:
copyright infringement,
(1)
ownership of
a valid
by the alleged
B. Nimmer, The
___
Law of Copyright
_________________
13.01
at 13-3
(1987).
Defendants do
not
Therefore, we turn to
judgment was
"Proof by
recorded."
is generally not
Concrete Mach.,
______________
843 F.2d
-5-
at
606.
witnessed or
Absent direct
evidence,
copying
may
be
inferred
defendant
had "access"
to
the plaintiff's
creation
423
from
showing
work
that the
prior to
the
between the works, Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc., 784 F.2d 44,
______
______________________
48 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 (1986); see Sid & Marty
____________
___ ___________
Cir. 1977).
Even if both
F.2d
defendant shows
at
independent creation.
the
raise
genuine
issue
Defendants' "access";
of
material
in
fact
with
respect
to
to justify
summary judgment.
must
produce evidence
the
from which
a reasonable
Cir. 1984).
finder of
a reasonable opportunity
fact
to
issue as to copying.
not sufficient to
create a factual
that the
200 and
700
bookstores
was
insufficient
to
infer
that
defendant
movie
-6-
producers had a
F.2d
of
reasonable opportunity to
"[T]he
698
conjecture alone."
Selle,
_____
On
district
the
court
summary
judgment
concluded
that,
had
access
to
With respect to
court
the
work.
is
all
fact,
it
it,
the
favorable
that Loh
showed that
Loh
to Grubb's work.
an intermediary with
Affidavit
in
had
copyrighted
drawing
showing that
even
before
Grubb's design;
materials
district
be proven by
was involved
Grubb
that
evidence that
also argues
Loh had
access to
his
Supplemental
Grubb's design.
creation,
traced
Grubb argues
that Loh's
questions
Loh's
testimony suggests
credibility,
and
submits
that Loh
Grubb also
that
Grubb's
Turning first
the
Patriots received
to Loh's
Grubb's sketch
Grubb's unsolicited
submission.
of
he
evidence
that
access, it is
believes
-7-
on February 9,
Grubb points
shows
undisputed that
Loh
1993, via
to several pieces
had
reasonable
First, according to
Grubb's
in
the
Jansen,
future.
as an
Additionally, Grubb
employee of
points
NFL Properties,
to the
him
fact that
admits that
he had
27,
1993, and
employed Loh.
Grubb
claims that
Jansen is
a point
of access
could
permissibly
infer
reasonable
opportunity
of fact
to
copy.
We
evidence
need
resolve
entitles him to
even assuming,
that
not
Grubb's
a finding of
contention
that
this
Loh created
the Patriots'
New Logo
prior to
February 9,
1993.2
to show that
Loh had
access to Grubb's work before Loh created the Patriots' New Logo.
See Concrete Mach., 843 F.2d at 605 n.6; Baxter, 812 F.2d at 423.
___ ______________
______
____________________
The
district
creation,"
access.
an
court described
independent
showing
this
as
"independent
that rebuts
prior
finding
of
is a
separate showing,
see
___
Grubb v.
_____
logical matter,
of a
necessarily be access
defendant's work,
see Baxter,
___ ______
prior to
_____
812 F.2d
the
at 423,
since resolution of this question either way would not affect the
result of our analysis.
-8-
In
his deposition,
Loh
stated that
he
began working
on
the
had finished, save for later refinements, the Patriots' New Logo.
Additionally, in
his affidavit,
that, in
of his
day
With
the aid
he created
identified
as
these
works
having
been
as January
28,
created during
1993.
this
What
period
color of the
depicted.
access
star3 in
This
to Grubb's
testimony
a few
shadings on the
demonstrates that
design prior
to creating
Loh did
the
Loh
bears
the
face
not have
Patriots' new
evidence shows
to February
9, 1993.
To be sure, Grubb
fact dispute
However,
from
conflict
in the
testimony, the
the
defendant's
absent a direct
opponent (although
entitled to
evidence positively
disbelieved.
to have
Takeall v.
_______
____________________
should be noted
that the
silver, it
color --
-9-
the
aff'd, 14 F.3d
_____
see
___
also
____
519
2726 at
of
with Grubb's
that
his and
so similar
therein opines
that Loh
must have
Loh had
drawn on
any particular
date, and
show what
not
by specific date.
Grubb
also points to
Loh's admission
that,
what.
Furthermore, Grubb
possible logos
on or after
however, irrelevant.
generating software
The
was still
February 9, 1993.
All of
sketching
this is,
program could
not be
backdated.
With his
timesheets and the summaries therein of how he used his time, Loh
testified
4, 1993, he
testified
February 9,
had essentially
that
he
he also
was
still
testified
working
that this
-10-
on
the
While
project
work involved
Loh
after
simple
continued
the color of
his timesheets
the star.
to recollect dates,
The
or that
fact
he
Grubb
also
facts
in
argues
that his
direct
conflict
Supplemental
with
Loh's
Affidavit represents
testimony.
Grubb's
logo's similarity
to Grubb's work.
Grubb
supplies reasoning --
the two
designs and the curve of the base line -- for why he believes the
new
without
evidence
work's creation.
cannot lead to
of access
prior
As a result, we
to
is in dispute.
a finding of
the allegedly
must look to
copying,
offending
whether Grubb's
--
since
the
latter
demonstrating prior
rebutted
creation.
any
finding
of
We conclude that,
access
by
even assuming
testimony, it
is
simply
not
in
-11-
direct
conflict
with
Loh's
testimony.
to having
done "tracings" in
the process
of
producing his work does not conflict with Loh's statement that he
had virtually
1993,
completed the
colonial
soldiers
that
Patriots' New
that Evenson
he
used,
and
Logo by February
had various
the
4,
pictures of
Summary
Judgment
materials indicated that Loh was sent designs similar to the 1979
The fact
new logo
by February 4, 1993.
As
conclude
a result,
that Loh
like
the district
composed his
court before
design prior
to
us, we
Grubb's work.
of
copying illogical.
(stating that
required
See
___
similarity is
shown, see
___
be
Publishing Co., 630 F.2d 685, 686 (1st Cir. 1980), and Plaintiff
_______________
has failed
regarding
to
demonstrate
a genuine
issue
of
material
fact
copied
from
the other,
proof of
because
no
explanation
other
access
than
-12-
may not
copying
is
be required,
reasonably
possible,"
at 13,
the lone
case that Plaintiff cites for this proposition, Flag Fables, Inc.
_________________
1165
present dispute
parties'
banners,
independent
creation
hearing
defendants
by
the
the evidence
advanced
was
of
at
the
simply
not
persuasive.
Id.
___
by failing to
reasonable
843
F.2d at
606; Walker,
784 F.2d
similarity.
at 48;
Concrete Mach.,
______________
Sid &
Marty Krofft
______
Television,
__________
562
requirements
is
F.2d
at
1162-63.
The
copyright
protection
precludes only
independently,
simple:
___________________
reason
both
for
be identical in
13.02;
Supp.
see also
________
146,
infringement
148
Arthur
______
n.3,
even where
149
(S.D.N.Y.
expressions are
similarity can
1985)
633 F.
(concluding
no
extremely similar,
if
be attributed to
the fact
that
both [works]
are artist's
renderings of the
same unprotectible
-13-
102(b)).
Thus, like
not
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
As
result of
the
foregoing, the
judgment
of the
-14-