Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Non-Destructive Testing:
NDT or Non Destructive Testing may be used as a means to evaluate the quality of a
component by assessing its internal and/or external integrity, but without destroying it.
There are many methods of NDT some of which require a very high level of skill both in
application and analysis and therefore NDT operators for these methods require a high
degree of training and experience to apply them successfully.
The four principle methods of NDT used are:
1)
Penetrant testing
2)
3)
Ultrasonic testing
4)
Radiographic testing
A welding inspector should have a general working knowledge of all these NDT
methods, their applications, advantages and disadvantages.
NDT operators are examined to establish their level of skill, which is dependant on their
knowledge and experience, in the same way as welders and welding inspectors are
examined and tested to establish their level of skill.
Various examination schemes exist for this purpose throughout the world. In the UK the
CSWIP and PCN examination schemes are those that are recognised most widely.
A good NDT operator has both knowledge and experience, however some of the above
techniques are more reliant on these factors than others.
15.1
Penetrant Testing
Basic Procedure
1)
The component must be thoroughly cleaned and have a smooth surface finish
2)
Penetrant is applied and allowed to dwell for a specified time. (Contact time)
3)
Once the dwell or contact time has elapsed, the excess penetrant is removed by
wiping with a clean lint free cloth, finally wiped with a soft paper towel moistened
with liquid solvent. (Solvent wipe)
4)
The developer is then applied, and any penetrant that has been drawn into any
defect by capillary action will be now be drawn out by reverse capillary action
5)
A close inspection is made to observe any indications (bleed out) in the developer
6)
Advantage
3) Result
Disadvantages
1)
1)
2)
2)
3)
Used on non-ferromagnetic
.
Low cost
3)
4)
4)
No permanent record
5)
Portability
5)
Hazardous chemicals
15.2
Test method for the detection of surface and sub-surface defects in ferromagnetic
materials
2)
3)
4)
Method
1) Apply contrast paint
Advantage
3) Result
Disadvantages
1)
1)
2)
2)
Demagnetisation may be
required
3)
3)
4)
Simple equipment
4)
No permanent record
5)
5)
15.3
Ultrasonic Testing
Basic Procedure
1)
Component must be thoroughly cleaned; this may involve light grinding to remove
any spatter, pitting etc in order to obtain a smooth surface
2)
Couplant is then applied to the test surface. (water, oil, grease etc.)
This enables the ultrasound to be transmitted from the probe into the component
under test
3)
A range of angled probes are used to examine the weld root region and fusion faces.
(Ultrasound must strike the fusion faces or any discontinuities present in the weld at
90 in order to obtain the best reflection of ultrasound back to the probe for display
on the cathode ray tube)
Method
1) Apply Couplant
3) Result
Sound probe
CRT display
Advantage
Disadvantages
1)
1)
2)
2)
Difficult to interpret
3)
3)
Requires calibration
4)
4)
No permanent record.
(Unless automated)
5)
15.4
Radiographic Testing
Basic Procedure
1)
2)
3)
4)
Method
a)
b)
Exposure to radiation
Radioactive source
c) Developed graph
Fe
Developed
graph
IQI
Film cassette
Advantage
Disadvantages
1)
Permanent record
1)
2)
2)
3)
3)
4)
4)
Health hazard
5)
5)
15.5
Application
Welds/Castings.
Surface testing only.
Penetrant
All materials can be
Testing
tested. Colour
contrast & florescent.
Welds/Castings
Ferrous metals only.
Magnetic
Wet & Dry inks.
Particle
Yokes. Permanent
Testing
magnets and straight
current AC/DC
Welds/Castings.
One side access.
Ultra Sonic
Un-favoured for large
Testing
grained structured
alloys.
i.e. Austenitic S/S
Welds/Castings.
Access from both
sides is required.
Radiographic All materials. Gamma
Testing
and X-ray sources of
radiation used.
Advantages
Low operator skill level
All non porous material
surfaces may be tested
Low cost process
Simple equipment
Low operator skill level
Surface/Sub surface flaws
Relatively low cost
Simple equipment
Can more easily find lack of
sidewall fusion defects
A wide variety of materials
can be tested
No safety requirements
Portable with instant results
Permanent record of results
A wide variety of materials
can be tested
Can assess penetration in
small diameter, or line pipe
Gamma ray is very portable
Disadvantages
Highly clean the material
Surface flaws only
Extremely messy
No permanent record
Fe magnetic metals only
De-magnetise after use
Can cause arc strikes using
straight current technique
No permanent record
High operator skill level
Difficult to interpret
Requires calibration
No permanent record
High operator skill level
Difficult to interpret
Cannot generally identify
lack of sidewall fusion**
High safety requirements
** To identify planar or 2 dimensional defects such as lack of side wall fusion, or cracks
etc, the orientation of the radiation beam must be in line with the orientation of the defect
as shown below, hence if the radiation source is at the centre of the weld then no
indication of lack of side wall fusion may be shown on the radiograph.
Radiation source
Lack of
sidewall fusion
Film
Radiation beam
15.6
Advantages
1
2
Penetrant
3
Testing
4
5
1
2
Magnetic
3
Particle
4
Testing
5
1
2
Ultra Sonic
3
Testing
4
5
1
2
Radiographic
3
Testing
4
5
Disadvantages
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
2)
Briefly state the major limitation of the Radiographic NDT process in terms
of the orientation and practical observation of internal planar imperfections?
3)
Complete the basic procedure for the Penetrant testing method of NDT?
1. The component must be thoroughly cleaned with a smooth surface finish
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15.7