Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Introduction
Literature review
Objectives
Methodology
Materials used
Tests and Results
Conclusions
References
Introduction
Improper disposal of waste is responsible for contamination of
geoenvironment.
Among various disposal methods like incineration, plasma
gasification etc., landfilling is considered to be safe and economical.
Production of highly contaminant leachate is the main drawback of
landfilling.
Leachate contaminated liquid waste percolating through deposited
waste which contains high concentrations of toxic chemicals
including heavy metals.
Heavy metals - refers to any metallic chemical element that has a
relatively high density and is poisonous even at low concentrations.
Components
of a
landfill
Threshold value
< 30
25
> 30
Plasticity Index
> 10
< 1 x 10-7
Literature review :
C.J. Miller et al. (1998) conducted tests to investigate desiccation
cracking of three compacted liner soils. Surficial dimensions of
cracks were quantified using the crack intensity factor (CIF),
which is the ratio of the surface area of cracks to the total surface
area of a soil. It was observed that nearly 90% of the cracking
occurred in 19-hour time period.
Benson and Trast (1995) performed hydraulic conductivity tests
on thirteen compacted clays that are used as landfill liners
throughout the U.S. Hydraulic conductivity was not uniquely
related to any of the compositional variables, suggesting that a
single index property is not sufficient to estimate hydraulic
conductivity.
Literature review :
M.H.T.Rayhani et al. (2007) studied effect of desiccation
induced cracking on hydraulic conductivities of clayey soils
from Iran. The results showed that the dimension of cracks
increased with increasing plasticity index and clay content so
the initial hydraulic conductivity increased with increased
plasticity index and cycles of wetting and drying.
Tanit Chalermyanont et al. (2008) studied about the transport of
heavy metals through a compacted sand-bentonite mixture and
its chemical compatibility was studied through the batch
adsorption test and the hydraulic conductivity test. The
hydraulic conductivity increased when permeated with mixed
heavy metal solution.
Literature review :
Seracettin Arasan,2010 -reported that chemical solutions
tended to reduce the thickness of the DDL and flocculate the
clay particles, resulting in reduction of liquid limit, reduction
of swelling and increasing of hydraulic conductivity of Clay
liners.
OBJECTIVES:
The primary scope of the present study is to evaluate the
suitability of selected locally available soils as compacted
clay liners based on their Desiccation Crack Intensity
Factors (DCIF) and Hydraulic Conductivity (HC) values
with following objectives:
1. To study the influence of variation in compaction water
contents on the DCIF and HC values of soils.
2. To analyze the effect of pH and presence of heavy metals in
the leachate on both DCIF and HC values of soils.
METHODOLOGY
Evaluation of soils as a landfill liner material
3 types of soils
(Black cotton soil, Red earth
and Dumping yard Soil)
Desiccation
cracking
Hydraulic
Conductivity tests
Crack Intensity
Factor
Permeability
Properties of Soils:
G
Silt
Clay
LL
PL
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Red Earth
27
41
26
38
21
17
Black
Cotton Soil
30
39
31
61
21
Dumping
Yard Soil
54
10
34
84
24
Parameter
PI
Classifcation
M.D.D
O.M.C
Free
Swell
(g/cc)
(%)
CI
1.8
19.7
40
CH
1.68
19.6
90
60
SC
1.77
17.5
240
(%)
Heavy Metal
Concentration
(ppm)
Cadmium
37
Zinc
24
Lead
Arsenic
6.1
Nickel
3.7
Samples dried.
Saturated with water/solution.
Samples dried again.
Wet-Dry Cycle
Continue
CIF = (Surface Crack Area (Ac) / Total Surface Area of Specimen (At)) x 100
where Ac=No. of Bright pixels
At = Total No. of pixels
CIF
Water
SHMS (pH-5)
2.79
2.79
2.79
2.79
2.79
0.04
0.2
0.23
0.17
0.15
3.68
8.71
8.82
6.54
6.2
(b) At optimum
Day
CIF
Water
SHMS (pH-5)
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.05
0.23
0.28
0.19
0.17
0.78
2.65
2.81
2.24
2.21
Water
SHMS
MHMS
SHMS
MHMS
(pH-5)
(pH-5)
(pH-10)
(pH-10)
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.09
0.28
0.31
0.26
0.24
0.63
2.48
2.63
2.12
1.97
CIF
Water
SHMS (pH-5)
MHMS (pH-5)
SHMS (pH-10)
MHMS (pH-10)
4.43
4.43
4.43
4.43
4.43
0.03
0.26
0.29
0.22
0.2
4.79
9.86
9.97
8.64
8.31
(b) At optimum
Day
CIF
Water
SHMS (pH-5)
MHMS (pH-5)
SHMS (pH-10)
MHMS (pH-10)
3.22
3.22
3.22
3.22
3.22
0.04
0.34
0.37
0.31
0.29
4.34
7.21
7.65
6.84
6.42
Water
SHMS (pH-5)
2.24
2.24
2.24
2.24
2.24
0.08
0.46
0.49
0.43
0.39
3.08
5.14
5.27
4.87
4.61
SC SOIL
(a) At wet of optimum
Day
CIF
Water
MHMS (pH-10)
5.13
5.13
5.13
5.13
5.13
0.032
0.24
0.26
0.21
0.19
6.81
12.64
12.878
10.81
10.04
(b) At optimum
Day
CIF
Water
MHMS (pH-10)
3.69
3.69
3.69
3.69
3.69
0.034
0.26
0.28
0.23
0.2
5.23
8.73
8.94
7.23
7.11
SC SOIL
(c) At dry of optimum
CIF
Day
Water
SHMS (pH-5)
2.95
2.95
2.95
2.95
2.95
0.043
0.32
0.49
0.29
0.25
4.82
5.61
5.85
5.14
5.09
2.Hydraulic Conductivity
Hydraulic conductivity of the soil samples was measured as per the
procedure given by Tanit Chalermyanont (2008)
K1
( 10 cm/s)
1.317
13.87
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.095
40
0.332
5.227
17.2
SC soil
60
0.091
1.328
14.6
-7
-7
( b) At optimum
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
1.81
12.58
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.141
40
0.505
7.17
14.2
SC soil
60
0.12
1.51
12.9
-7
-7
( c) At dry of optimum
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
1.97
9.4
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.21
40
0.751
9.087
12.1
SC soil
60
0.183
1.88
10.3
-7
-7
K1
( 10 cm/s)
4.87
20.85
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.234
40
0.99
30.05
30.31
SC soil
60
0.54
11.7
21.68
-7
-7
( b) At optimum
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
6.83
16.8
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.4067
40
2.066
59.5
28.8
SC soil
60
0.75
15.42
20.56
-7
-7
( c) At dry of optimum
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
10.06
13.08
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.765
40
3.213
78.754
24.51
SC soil
60
1.175
22.6
19.25
-7
-7
K1
( 10 cm/s)
4.131
26.52
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.155
40
0.889
28.09
31.57
SC soil
60
0.322
8.956
27.8
-7
-7
( b) At optimum
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
6.55
19.8
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.331
40
1.898
54.75
28.57
SC soil
60
0.41
10.217
26.52
-7
-7
( c) At dry of optimum
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
13.835
18.07
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.75
40
2.512
66.638
26.52
SC soil
60
0.588
13.45
23.02
-7
-7
K1
( 10-7 cm/s)
4.92
17.04
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10-7 cm/s)
0.289
40
1.026
32.015
31.2
SC soil
60
0.837
16.6
19.84
(b) At optimum
K0
K1
( 10-7 cm/s)
7.17
13.8
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10-7 cm/s)
0.519
40
2.255
59.5
26.38
SC soil
60
0.887
17.42
19.6
( c) At dry of optimum
K0
K1
( 10-7 cm/s)
12.06
13.6
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10-7 cm/s)
0.887
40
4.018
87.84
21.86
SC soil
60
1.261
23.78
18.86
PI
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
3.693
25.58
Kr
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.144
40
0.656
25.48
38.8
SC soil
60
0.268
7.721
28.75
-7
-7
(b) At optimum
Soil
PI
K0
K1
( 10 cm/s)
6.181
20.52
Kr
Red earth
17
( 10 cm/s)
0.301
40
1.649
54.75
33.2
SC soil
60
0.402
8.882
22.05
-7
-7
K1
( 10-7 cm/s)
11.65
19.88
Kr
Soil
PI
Red earth
17
( 10-7 cm/s)
0.583
40
2.03
60.58
29.83
SC soil
60
0.556
12.17
20.68
Water
SHMS
SHMS
MHMS
MHMS
(pH-5)
(pH-10)
(pH-5)
(pH-10)
Red Earth
13.87
20.85
26.52
17.04
25.58
17.2
30.31
31.57
31.2
38.8
SC soil
14.6
21.68
27.8
19.84
28.75
Conclusions
CIF values are observed to be more for soils having high plasticity
index values.
The soils compacted at wet of optimum moisture content showed
higher crack intensity factors and CIF value is more for the second
cycle of drying.
When acidic heavy metal solutions were used, the crack intensity
factors and hydraulic conductivity values are more when compared to
that of water, whereas under alkali conditions, the increase in these
values is found to be less.
Conclusions
The values of permeability ratios initially increased with
increase in plasticity index to some extent, but then decreased
with further increase in PI due to high self-healing of the soil.
In all the cases of tests done with heavy metal solutions, Red
Earth Soil showed minimum values of CIFs, hydraulic
conductivity and also permeability ratios hence Red Earth Soil
may be the suitable soil as a liner material among selected
locally available soils.
References