Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
77-96, 1992
Printed in Great Britain
Abstract--Some 150 new isotopic age determinations on metamorphic rocks from the Cordillera Real and parts of E1 Ore Provinee in Ecuador, using K-At, Rb-Sr, and Sm-Nd methods, help to clarify a complex succession of magmatic and tectonic events.
The earliest regional metamorphic/plutonic event recognized, from the Tahuin Group in El O1"o,is dated as between ca. 220 and
200 Ma (Late Triassic-Early Jurassic). Similar but less well constrained ages were also obtained from orthogneiases of the
Sabanilla and Tres Lagtmas subdivisions in the Cordillera Real. Major eale-alkaline granitdids were emplaeed ca. 190-150 Ma
(Middle-Late Jurassic) in the eastern part of the Cordillera Real, to the north of 2"S, and throughout the sub-Andean zone.
Between ca. 140 and 120 Ma (Early Cretaceous), the Oriente region was uplifted and eroded and the Cordillera was affected by an
important shearing (dynamothermai) event which resulted in the resetting of older plutonic ages. From ca. 120 to 85 Ma, conditions were relatively stable, but during ca. 85 to 65 Ma (Late Cretaceous), the Cordillera and Oriente were again uplifted. This
uplift corresponds to a second widespread thermal overprinting, which produced a regional disturbance in the K-Ar isotopic systems. Throughout the Cordillera, a number of generally small, undeformed, dominantly lower Tertiary plutons are also present. A
few older (i.e., pre-Mesozoic) dates have been obtained but their interpretation remains uncertain.
R e s u m e n - - U n a s 150 nuevas determinaciones de edades isot6picas de rocas metam6rflcas de la Cordillera Real y parte de la pro-
vincia de E1 Ore en el Ecuador, usando los m~todos K-Ar, Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, ayudan en clarificar una sucosi6n eompleja de eventos
magrn~lticos y tect6nicos. El evento metam6rfico/plut6nico regional m ~ temprano reconocido, es el del grupo Tahufn en E1 Ore;
est~ entre ca. 220 y 200 Ma (TriMico tardfo-JurMico temprano). Edades similares, pete menos definidas, fueron tambi6n obtenidas de los ortogneises de Sabanilla y Tros Lagunas en la Cordillera Real. Los mayores granitoides ealco-alcalinos fueron
emplazados ca. 190-150 Ma (Jur~sico medic a tard(o), en la parte oriental de la Cordillera Real, al norte de 2" de latitud S, yen
toda la zuna subandina. Entre ca. 140 y 120 Ma (CrelAcicotemprano) la regi6n Oriental fue levantada y erosionada; y la cordillera
rue afectada per un evento de cizallamiento muy importante (dinamotermal), que result6 en el reajuste de 1as antiguas edades
plut6nicas. Desde ca. 120-85 Ma las condiciones fueron relativamente estables, pete durante ca. 85-65 Ma (Cretatcico tardfo) la
cordillera y el Oriente fueron de nuevo levantadas. Este levantamiento corresponde a una segunda sobre impresi6n termal que
produjo una perturbaci6n regional en los sistemas isot6picos K-At. Per toda la cordillera est,Lnpresentes un ndmero de plutones
generalmente pequetlos, no deformados; dominantemente del Tereiario temprano. Hart side obtenidas pocas edades antiguas (Premesozoicas), pete la interpertaci6n de 6stes permaneee todavfa incierta.
INRODUCTION
T H E C O R D I L L E R A R E A L R e s e a r c h Project is a j o i n t T e c h nical C o o p e r a t i o n P r o g r A m m e undertaken by the Overseas
D e v e l o p m e n t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( O D A ) o f Great Britain
through the British G e o l o g i c a l S u r v e y ( B G S ) in c o n j u n c tion w i t h the C o r p o r a c i 6 n de D e s a r r o l l o e l n v e s t i g a c i 6 n
G e o l o g i c o - M i m r o M e t a l u r g i c a ( C O D I G E M ) in Ecuador.
' S i n c e the start o f the project in 1986, advances h a v e
b e e n m a d e in the understandin~ o f the stratigraphy and
structural e l e m e n t s in the Cordillera R e a l and parts o f E l
0 r e P r o v i n c e in s o u t h w e s t E c u a d o r (Fig. 1). S o m e o f these
f i n d i n g s h a v e already b e e n p r e s e n t e d ( e . g . , Litherland e t
\
/
/
/
lib.
Address all correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John A. Aspdea at BGS International Division, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12
78
al., 1990; Aspdon and Litherland, 1992). In this contribution we concentrate solely on documenting the geochronological data that have been obtained. The isotopic analyses
were carried out at the Natural Environment Research
Council's Isotope Geology Centre in London - - now renamed the National Isotope G-eosciences Laboratory
(NIGL) and relocated at Keyworth, Nottingham.
Geographical Setting
The Cordillera Real is the eastern of two parallel mountain chains that define the Ecuadorian Andes. In the north,
the Western Cordillera is separated from the Cordillera
Real by a prominent structural valley, the Inter-Andean
Depression, but in the south the Andes are represented by a
single cordillera. To the east of the Ecuadorian Andes lies
the sub-Andean zone and the Oriente, which form part of
the upper reaches of the Amazon Basin. To the west lies the
flat, low coastal region of the Costa (Fig. 1).
Geological Background
North of Guayaquil, the Costa comprises Upper Cretaceous to Cenozoic fore-arc sedimentary rocks floored by
Lower Cretaceous oceanic basalts of the Piflon Formation
(Baldock. 1982; Goossens and Rose. 1973). There is no
evidence of continentalcrust below these rocks (Feininger
and Seguin, 1983). This part of Ecuador is thus thought to
represent oceanic crust that was accreted to the South
American plate in the Late Cretaceous or Paleocene (Bourgois et al., 1990; Daly, 1989). In contrast, south of Guayaquil, the rocks of El 0ro Province (Fig. 1) consist mainly of
granitic plutons and metamorphic rocks, which include amphibolites, schism, and gneisses. The Western Cordillera
comprises a NNF_,-trevdinS belt of Cretaceous to lower Tertiary volcanic, volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks that
have been reported on by Van Thoumout and Quevedo
(1990). Lebrat et al.. (1985), and Henderson (1979).
The inhospitable nature of the CcediUera Real, with its
high altitude and abundant rainfall, together with limited
road access, has hindered study of the geology of thisregion of Ecuador. The Cordillera Real forms a continuous
belt of variably deformed and metamorphosed rocks that
extends the length of the Ecuadorian Andes and COnSiStsof
schists, quartzites,calc-schists,marbles, and ortho- and
paragneisses (Aspden and Litherland, 1992). A number of
late,undeformed plutons cut the metamorphic rocks, and a
series of major Plio-Pleistocene stratovolcanoes dot the
Cordillera.
Overlying the basement of the Oriente,which comprises
rocks belonging to the Amazmic cratou (Almeida et aI.,
1981), are epi-platform Paleozoic and lower Mesozoic
sedimentary strata. These are overlain by Upper Jurassic
volc~n~ and Upper Cretaceous marine miogeosynclinal
sedlmantary rOCks. Following the Andean uplift, back-arc
sedimantation occurred during the Cenozoic (Jalliard et al.,
1990; Baldock, 1982; Tschopp, 1953).
New geochrcmologicalcontrol fox the tectono-mac,m~tic evolution of the metamorphic basement, Ecuador
(a)
79
(b)
.'
oo'w
-.COLO~
Pimompiro~ . ~ . ~ . ~ 7
j/
--OoO0 '
|ou,,o
Ni
~7":
...:-....-:.-;:-f w Baeza
IqO0'S
Teno
Arnobato
[]
I T : :
Lag . . . .
grani.
Mare
ePuya
UNDEFORMED PLUTONS
(~
~)
(~
eRiobamba
Pimampiro
Condue
Azuela
Pungala
~oo'w
$..
Fig. 2. Location and simplifiedgeological map of the CordilleraReal/sub-Andeanzone: a) betweenthe Colombianfrontier and 2"S
(based on Litherland et al., 1990); b) between 2S and the Peruvian frontier (based on Litherlandet al.. 1990), inset map of E10ro
metamorphicprovinceafter Baldock(1982).
Silberman, 1982), throwing the Precambriau age assigned
to these rocks into considerable doubt. The Hedras e0nvelops the Raspas b l ~ t
complex (~inin~, 1980,
1978) (Fig. 2b), fro"which a K-At age of 132 5 Ma (phengite) has been obtained (Feininoer and Silbermsn; 1982).
Both the Pie&as Group and the Raspas complex are bounded to the north and south by low- to high-grade semi-pelific
rocks and variably d e f o m ~ granites of the Tahuin Group
(Fig. 2b). Feininger (1982) has interpreted this group to be
D~cmisn in age, based on a brac.hiopod foLmdin a weakly
metamorphosed quartzite in northwest Peru. However,
F e i n i n ~ and Silbe~man (1982) obtained an age of 210 + 8
Ma hem biotite separated from a pelitic gneiss of the
Tabuin Group, which they considered to be the age of uplift.
SAES6:1/2-F
GraniticRocks
Three majm" NNE-trendins ekmsate granitoid batholiths occur in the sub-Andean zone alto8 the eastern tectonic margin of the Cordillera Real. From north to south,
these are the Rosa Florida, Abitagua, and Zam~a
batholiths (Fig. 2).
The Abitasua batholith has received the most attenticm.
Kennerly (1980) reported a K-Ar age of 87 + 7 Ma co a biorite separate, whereas Herbert and Pichler (1983) recorded
178 + 7 Ma from a biotite separate at a nearby locality (both
samples were collected aloe8 the Bsflos-Puyo road) 0r18.
2a).
A K-Ar age of 171 6 Ma was obtain_ by Aly (1980)
from the Zamcca batholith, and K-At dates of 173 5 Ma
80
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
Rb-Sr Amllysis
Rb-Sr analyses were carried out on whole-rock powder
samples from meta-plutonic rocks and orthogneisses. Rb/
Sr ratios were determined by X-ray fluorescence using an
automated Philips spectrometer. For the isotope ratio determinations, strontium was extracted from the samples using
acid dissolution and ion exchange methods in a cleanchemistry laboratory and analyzed with an automated
multi-collector VG354 mass spectrometer.
The Rb/Sr ratios are quoted with a blanket error of
:L-0.5% (1-sigma). Replicate analyses of samples and standards suggest that a reproducibility of _+0,005%is appropilate for the strontium isotope measurements. Replicate
analyses of international standards indicate that the results
are accurate within the precision estimates.
The errors on age and initial ratio (Ri) are quoted as 2sigma (95% confidence level) and refer to the last significant figure. Best-fit lines on the isochron diagrams were
calculated using a least-squares fitting program. An
MSWD (mean square of weighted deviates) exceeding 3.0
means that the points do not all fit the line within the limits
of analytical error and, following conventional practice, the
errors on age and intercept have been enhanced by multiplying by the square root of the MSWD. All ages were calculated using a decay constant for 87Rb of 1.42 10 -11
a--l.
Sm-Nd Analysis
This technique was used on whole-rock and garnet
pairs, relying on the fractionation of the rare earth elements
in garnet relative to the host whole-rock.
Sm and Nd were analyzed by a double isotope dilution
method. Powdered whole-rock and garnet samples were
dissolved in acid with an added mount of a Sm-Nd mixed
spike. Both the Sin and the Nd were then exlracted using
ion exchange methods and separately analysed on the mass
spectrometer.
Errors in the Sm/Nd and the 143/144 Nd Analyses are
quoted as 0.2% and 0.005% (1-sigma), respectively, again
based on replicate analyses of international standards. The
results are presented in the form of isochron diagrams similar to Rb-Sr, and the techniques used in calculating the
best-fit lines, ages. and errors are the same.
K-Ar Analysis
K-At analyses were carried out predominantly on biotite, muscovite, and hornblende separates and only rarely
ou whole-rock samples. This technique was used on all
suite,s collected where the appropriate unaltered minerals
were present to support either the Rb-Sr or the Sm-Nd resuits.
New geochronological control for the tectono-magmatic evolution of the metamorphic basement, Ecuador
81
against international standards, so the results can be expected to be accurate within the limits of analytical error.
The ages were calculate~l using the constants recommended by Steiger and Jaeger (1977), and the error on the
age is quoted at the 95% confidence level.
RESULTS
The samples collected for dating axe listed in Table 1.
The Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd analyses are given in Tables 2 and
3, respectively, and the K-Ar data. with the calculated ages.
are presented in Table 4. These results are discussed below.
and the localities mentioned in the text are shown in Fig. 2.
Rock type(s)
Grid
Reference
Area
Map Sheet*
Bafios-Puyo road
Batios (e)
7939-8458/
7918-8457
Biotitic amphibolite
Papallacta village
Papallacta (c)
8184-99596
CRSH/89/1A
Garnet amphibolite
Papallacta (c)
8246-99608
CRSH/89/1B-C
Papallacta (c)
8246-99608
Amphibolite
North of Valladolid
Valladolid
7079-94983
CCR/87/24B
Muscovite pe~aatite
North of Valladolid
Valladolid
7079-94984
CCR/87/24C
Muscovite pegmatite
South of Valladolid
Valladolid
7075-94935
CCR/87/24D
Biotite pegmatite
Near Palanda
Valladolid
7074-94868
CRSH/89/10A-D
Garnet-bearing gneisses/migmatites
Valladolid
7075-94976
Biotitic orthogneisses
East of Sabanilla
Loja Norte
7199-9562/
7199-95588
CRSH/89/12A-C
Biotite orthogneisses
East of Sabanilla
Loja Notre
7199-95587
CRSH/89/12D-J
East of Sabanilla
Loja Norte
7197-95600
FV57/FV58
Biotitic orthogneisses
East of SabaniHa
Loja Norte
7194-95614
Sigsig
7476-96578
Qda. La Pieota
Nambacola
6917-95396
CRSH/89/11G-J
Qda. Cobalera
Nambacola
6914-95399
Saraguro
ca. 712-9604
Rfo Negro
(continued)
82
Table 1 (continued)
Sample No.
Rock type(s)
Area
Map Sheet*
Grid
Reference
Arenillas bridge
Arenillas
6049-96072
West of Poctovela
Zamma
8519-95882
La Avanzada
6213-95955
Amphibolites
Amphibolites
Marcabefi
6218-95911
CRSH/89/19
Maroabeli
6219-95927
Balsas quarry
Marcabeli
6308-95837
CRSH/89/4F-J
Southwest of Marcabeli
Marcabeli
6188-95775
CCR/gT/16A-H
La Pax area
Yantzaxa
7362-95864/
7369-95845
CCR/87/17
Hornblende diorite
Yantzaxa
7368-95845
CCR/87/18
Yantzaxa
7368-95845
CCR/87/19
Hornblende granodiodte
Yantzaxa
7351-95830
CCR/87/20
South of La Pax
Yantzaxa
7340-95783
CCR]87/21A-J
Guaysimi
7660-95530/
7652-95540
CCR/87/22A-F
Zamora
7294-95428
7288-95432
(22F)
CCR/87/25
Palanda-Zumba road
Rio Mayo
7074-94804
CCR/87/26A-E
Palaada-Zumba road
Rfo Mayo
7074-94809/
7075-94781
CRSH/89/13A-B
Hornblende diorites
Yantzaza
7432-95930
FV60
Guaysimi
7575-95527
RM1
Rio Mayo
Zumba
7144-94536
FV681
East of palanda
Vailadolid
7218-94880
FV485
Valladolid
7175-94972
CCR/87/5A-I
Cosanga (c)
CCR/87/6A,B,D,
G-K
Bafioa-Puyo road
Mera (c)
8131-98442/
812%98444
CCR/87/6C,E,F
Bafloa-Puyo road
Mera (c)
8148-98405/
812%98444
CCR/87/7
Bafloa-Puyo mad
Mera (c)
8147-98404
ADML5
Hornblende granodiorite
Mera (c)
8127-98444
Zamora Bathollth
Abitagua Batholtlk
New geochronological control for the tectono-magmatic evolution of the metamorphic basement, Ecuador
83
Table 1 (continued)
Sample No.
Grid
Reference
Rock type(s)
Area
Map Sheet*
CCR/87/SA-I
Baflca-Puyo road
Baflos (c)
8058-98448/
8039-98449
CCR/87/9
Biotite granodiorite
Baflos-Puyo road
Baflos (c)
80~9-98450
CCR/87/IOA-B
Bafios-Puyo road
Baflos (c)
8009-8452
ADMIA
Bafios(c)
8009-8452
Biotite orthogneisses
Northwest of Pimampiro
Huaca (c)
8869-100605/
8871 - 100595
Qda. Tungurahua
Huaca (c)
8834-100690
CCR/87/1A
Hornblende granodiorite
Near Mataqui
Pimampiro
1744-00420
CCR/87/1C
Hornblende granodiorite
Qda. Manzanal
Pimampiro
1785-00438
Osogochi area
Totoras
7678-97580/
7621-97520
Principal (c)
7650-96663
Azafl~n Bathollth
Sacha Pluton
CCR/87/3
Plmampb'o Pluton
Ma~taydn Pluton
CCR/87/13A-C
FV83
Biotite granodiorite
Qda. Tunttln
Santiago
6933-95849
FVI1
Hornblende granodiorite
Qda. Bucashi
Santiago
6928-95857
FV15
FV34
Biotite granodiorite
Juntas
Qda. E1Gallo
6948-95785
Loja Norte
6985-95740
7625-97080
Catamayo Pluton
CCR/87/29A-B
Biotite granodiorite
Catamayo
(La Toma)
Biotite granodiorite
Rfo Pinchinal
Saraguro
7045-95999
Guamote and
Riobamba
7680-97965/
7680-98000
PtcMnal Pluton
CRSH/89/15
Pungald Pluton
CCR/87/12A-C
..........
Laguna Cox
6773-94723
CCR/87/27C-G
..........
Laguna Cox
6755-94744/
6745-94765
the Valladolid area in southern Ecuador. Although a combination of K-At, Rb-Sr, and Sm-Nd data has been ohmined frown these rocks, the resultsare far from conclusive.
T w o suitesof orthogmiss from the Sabanilla and VaUadolid areas were dated by the Rb-Sr method, but both data
sets show a wide scattexon the isochrcm diagrams. Never-
84
Sample No.
Rb
Sr
gTRb
$7Sr
~Sr
S6Sr
Sample No.
Rb
8/Rb
gTSr
Sr
S6Sr
SeSr
23.4
19. 85
CRSH/89/12A
106.2
188.7
1.6714
0.71801
CCR/87/5E
CRSH/89/12B
97.8
207.8
13973
0.71690
CCR/87/5F
66.5
421
0.4574
0.70560
CRSH/89/12C
83.7
182.5
13628
0.71686
CCR/87/5G
92.3
389
0.6868
0.70620
327
0.9044
0.70664
160
CRSH/89/12D
82.8
178.6
13767
0.71671
CCR/87/SH
CRSH/89/12E
104.0
204.9
1.5065
0.71717
CCR/87/5I
150
CRSH/89/12F
100.3
191.3
1.5575
0.71740
CCR/87/6B
132
CRSH/89/12G
117.5
209.9
1.6629
0.71742
CCR/87/6D
130
98.5
CRSH/89/12H
87.9
188.6
13848
0.71671
CCR/87/6G
225
15.2
CRSH/89/I 2I
82.7
176.2
13946
0.71670
CCR/87/6H
102
CRSH/89/12J
73.5
214.5
1.0175
0.71596
CCR/87/61
103
93.1
CCR/87/23A
123
204
1.747
0.71788
CCR/87/6J
CCR/87/23B
110
197
1.601
0.71774
CCR/87/6K
201
0.6521
0.71436
CCR/87,r23c
45.2
235
54.9
54.1
428
0.74963
8.016
0.72298
0.8886
0.70667
3.821
0.71348
43.31
0.80394
355
0.8319
0.70670
382
0.7041
0.70615
10.3
959
67.85
0.86170
0.1659
0.70494
5.190
0.71840
CCR/87/23D
128
208
1.768
0.71776
CCR/87/16D
82.6
CCR/87/23E
119
210
1.633
0.71682
CCR/87/16E
46.7
247
0.5469
0.70609
CCR/87/23F
128
192
1.931
0.71716
CCRf87/16F
51.1
238
0.6231
0.70622
231
1.205
0.71546
CCR/87/16G
14.9
374
0.1160
0.70499
124
2.833
0.72173
CCR/87/16H
26.1
270
0.2802
0.70530
391
0.4904
0.70631
CCR/87/23G
CCR/87/23H
96.3
121
46.2
CRSH/89/11A
124.5
142.0
2.6054
0.71922
CCR/87~1A
66.2
CRSH/89/I 1B
124.6
138.3
26795
0.71994
CCR/87/'21B
70.7
367
0.5582
0.70665
CRSH/89/11C
129.5
133.8
2.8755
0.71967
CCR/87/21D
63.9
432
0.4281
0.70629
CRSH/89/11D
117.5
144.6
2.4150
0.71883
CCR/87/21E
79.1
391
0.5844
0.~
CRSH/89/11E
126.1
137.1
27307
0.71975
CCR/87/21F
96.7
339
0.8275
0.70734
CRSH/89/11F
131.9
168.0
23324
0.71871
CCR/87/21G
62.8
364
0.4992
0.70635
CRSH/89/11G
138.7
99.5
4.1415
0.72156
CRSH/89/11H
134.3
131.1
3$)438
0.72075
CCR/87/22A
373
0.8170
0.70660
CRSH/89/11I
135.1
129.4
3.0908
0.72082
CCR/87/22B
181
1.139
0.70770
CRSH/89/14A
189.7
95.0
5.9439
0.72867
CCR/87/22C
103
387
0.7701
0.70645
CRSH/89/14B
174.8
106.9
4.8(~6
0.72590
CCR/87/22D
107
385
0.8054
0.70649
CRSH/89/14C
186.7
93.3
5.9499
0.72893
CCR/87/22E
96.8
388
0.7213
0.70640
CRSH/B9/14D
182.7
102.0
53283
0.72839
CCR/87/22F
59.2
674
0.2545
0.70460
CRSH/89/14E
175.1
97.3
53507
0.72684
CRSH/89/14G
186.3
97.7
5.6710
0.72905
CCR/87/26A
58.6
329
0.5161
0.70617
CRSH/89/14H
197.0
85.8
6.8323
0.73043
CCR/87/26B
56.0
335
0.4848
0.70612
105
71.8
CRSH/89/14I
173.7
103.2
5.0067
0.72579
CCR/87/26C
53.5
325
0.4763
0.70599
CRSH/89/14J
169.8
109.9
4.5905
0.72520
CCR/87/'26D
47.3
359
0.3821
0.70592
CRSH/89/14K
144.7
102.1
4.1989
0.72379
CCR/87/26E
42.4
353
0.3476
0.70578
A ldtagua Batholtth
CCR/87/SA
CCR/87/5B
CCRhl7/5C
CCR/87/5D
Azafran Batholith
159
85.9
156
87.0
22.7
285
26.3
259
20.42
0.8717
17.29
0.9730
0.75183
CCR/87/8A
100
86.5
3.345
0.71029
0.70652
CCR/87/SB
127
70.8
4.817
0.71291
0.74410
CtI{/87/SD
109
77.1
4.074
0.71160
0.70677
CCR/87/SE
110
75.5
4.229
0.71171
New geochronological control for the tectono-magmatic evolution of the metamorphic basement, Ecuador
Table 2 (continued)
Sample No.
Rb
85
87Rb
STSr
Sr
SSSr
S6Sr
CCR/87/SF
111
71.0
4.495
0.71223
CCR/87/8G
111
80.5
3.984
0.71147
CCR/87/SH
104
60.3
5.004
0.71309
Chingual Batholith
CCR/87/2B
38.2
467
0.2368
0.70414
CCR/87/2C
44.4
353
0.3640
0.70450
CCR/87/2D
46.3
335
0.3999
0.70460
CCR/87/2E
31.6
517
0.1766
0.70406
CCR,t87/2F
30.6
507
0.1748
0.70402
CCR/87/2G
31.2
507
0.1779
0.70413
CCR/87/2I
44.7
417
0.3106
0.70428
CCR/87/2J
46.6
405
0.3326
0.70433
123
3.049
0.70703
5.561
0.70887
0.9165
0.70536
143Nd
Sm
(ppm)
Nd
(ppm)
144Nd
144Nd
CRSH/89/6A (wr)
5.59
30.63
0.1102
0.512075
CRSH/89/tA (gt)
4.56
14.52
0.1898
0.512220
CRSH/89/6B (wr)
7.63
37.41
0.1232
0.512132
CRSH/89/tB (gt)
6.62
23.54
0.1700
0.512170
CRSH/89/6C (wr)
6.33
34.64
0.1105
0.512074
CRSH/89/6C (gt)
4.22
10.73
0.2377
0.512280
CRSH/89/6D (wr)
7.92
40.13
0.1193
0.512111
CRSH/89/6D (gt)
5.53
16.74
0.1997
0.512245
CRSH/89/6E (wr)
7.23
38.83
0.1126
0.512099
CRSH/89/6E (gt)
4.83
14.93
0.1956
0.512237
Sample No.
147Sm
130
CCR/87/28B
154
CCR/87,r28c
82.2
79.9
263
86
87Sr/86Sr
O. 514
(o)
O. 725
O. 720
(b)
........... 4-..--Hl-"-l-
0.5t2
...............
.....
0,5i0
O. 7 t 5
0.710
AGE
Intercept
O. 705
I
" 2.0
O. 508
0.735
~3Nd / 144Nd
Errors
87Rb/86Sr
AGE 2 t 9 22 Me (2s)
I n t e r c e p t 0 . 5 1 i 9 0.0000
MSWD 0.4
t47Sm/144N(
0.506
0.4,
5.0
[
0.5
0-5
I
87 Sr / 86 Sr
87 Sr/86 Sr
(C)
(d)
~ ..........
........
0.850
....
~.,e'~:~:~........
. .....
,....."'"*
0.725
0.800
..."
0.7t5
AGE 200 _+ 12 Ma 12s)
Zntercept 0.7t20 + 0.0007
MSWD|69.1 Enhanced Errors
87Rb/86Sr
0.705
"" """'"'"'""
L
""'
~. 750
..,'tF'"Int ercept
.:,+: ....
0.7046 -+ 0 . 0 0 0 0
t Mal2s)
MSWD 2.5
[
40
87Sr/86Sr
AGE t62 ~
3O
87Rb/86Sr
I
50
70
I
I
(e)
. .-"-"
0.720
0.708
87Sr/86Sr
(f)
..... .+ ..............
., .-"1"'"
...."
0.715
0.706
..,.'""
. ...'"
. ..'"
0.710
..."
0.704
. .-""
AGE 187 +
Intercept
0.705
0.7046
2 Ma 12s)
! 0.0000
0 702
MSWD 2 . 9
87b/86Sr
O. 709
:5
87Sr/86Sr
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
87Sr/86Sr
(cj)
0.707
(h)
..... + . . - ~ ........... , ~ . e ...........
.~..,p~. ......................
O. 707
JP"
0 705
.... ..,'""
.,..'
O. 705
.....,'"
0.703
AGE 144 +_ 35 Ma (2s)
O. 703
Intercept
0.7037
*0-0002
MSWD 4 . 4 Enhanced E r r o r s
87Rb/86Sr
0.701
I
0.2
~ntercept
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.7051
+ 0.0002
MSWD 2.7
O. 701
87Rb/86Sr
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
New geochronological conlrol for the tectono-magmatic evolution of the metamorphic basement, Ecuador
O. 714
I .."
..."
(i)
87Sr/86 Sr
87Sr/86Sr
.... "
(J)
O. 705
...~.4..++....
87
.#
....
+ ........... ~ , v . . ~
' 4 ...............
0.704
O. 710
...'"
O. 706
0.703
.."
.,'"
.,.'"
Intercept
MSWD 2 . 4
O. 702
0.702
AGE 156 -~ 21 Mo ( I s )
Intercept
0,701
87Rb/86Sr
0.7037
*_ O, O00l
MSWD 2 . 8
87Rb/86Sr
I
O I
0.2
0.3
0.4
87Sr/86Sr
(k)
..,.--"
...-
.o.-'
0.708
...o"
..,"
,,..~""'"
......,"
0.706
.....""
...-
AGE
Intercept
0.704
53 -~ 2 Mo (2s)
0 . 7 0 4 7 +_0.0001
I .6
MSWD
i
87Rb/86 Sr
I
76.51
44.89
27.13
9.29
0.294
5.817
5.741
6.965
CRSH/g9/IA Cob)
~:
CRSH/89/I B Cot)
.'[
CRSH/89/1C (rose)
9.794
10
6.46
5.96
7.78
5.72
24.6
27.3
15.23
50.44
CCR/87/14A COt)
5.38
8.36
7.39
7.09
6.54
7.02
6.50
7.20
7.41
CCR/87/24A COt)
CCR/87/24B (msc)
CCR/87/24C (rose)
CCR/87/24D COt)
CRSH/89/10A (msc)
CRSH]89/10A COt)
CRSH/89/10C (msc)
CRSH/89/10C COt)
CRSH/89/IOD Cot)
16.30
24.085
23.274
18.926
23.672
17.809
20.35
21.6
22.48
82 -+
81 +
73 +
85 +
69 +
72 +
65 _+
77 +
76 _+
135 +
7.26
7.75
7.43
7.32
7.43
7.45
46.30
32.59
67.56
18.07
85.80
44.87
CRSH/89/14E (rose)
CRSH/89/14D COt)
CRSH/89/14D (rose)
8.13
7.22
6.29
36.11
25.96
61.01
CRSH/89/1 IF COt)
CRSH/89/I IF (msc)
CRSH/89/I1B COt)
CRSH/89/llB (msc)
CRSH/89/llA COt)
CRSH/89/11A (rose)
55.0
41.6
:~ Duplicate analysis. Key: arm, atmospheric; bt, biotite; hb, hornblende; msc, muscovite; rad, radiogenic; wr, whole rock.
32.83
23.56
58.22
28.51
43.85
12.6
51.4
54.8
40.8
3.178
71.4
6.10
6.03
FV58 COt)
FV57 COt)
CRSH/89/12C COt)
CRSH/89/12C (rose)
3.012
64.6
44
20
10
23
32.67
33.14
CCR/g7/14D COt)
0.584
128 :t:
74 +
881 +
844 +
306 +
342 +
371 +
6.09
7.83
31.3
22.9
CCR/87/24A (hb)
20.373
253.597
243.146
3.815
4.301
7.58
7.64
50.93
39.0
0.294
:~
363 +
CCR/87f23F COt)
CCR/87]23E COt)
CRSH/g9/12A COt)
9.563
27
CRSH/89/12A (mse)
0.612
19.3
74 +
75 +
CCR/87/4 (hb)
1.413
0.457
79.1
94.6
0.156
25.7
0.472
7.81
CCR/87/11E (mica)
33
CCR/87/llD (mica)
78 +
4Ara~
(%)
CCR/87/23D COt)
0.421
Sample No.
K
(%)
95.3
Age
(Ma)
0.135
4OArmd
(hi/g)
CCR/87/11B (mica)
(%)
Sample No.
Aram
(%)
23.584
17.619
16.812
18.827
30.615
18.531
28.793
18.996
29.642
20.83
19.5
24.9
19.7
26.784
14.86
26.348
15.841
24.69
24.93
25.44
40Arr.d
(nl/g)
73 +
62 +
68 +
65 ::l:
99 +
63 -
99 +
65 +
100 +
86 +
81 -
97 +
83 +
86 +
66 +
84 _+
66 +
82 -+
82 +
82 +
Age
OVta)
.z
.:z
.>
oo
oo
61.822
8.67
8.51
70.042
55.487
193 +
221 +
13
CRSH/89/13B (lab)
FV60 (hb)
0.570
0.16
0.17
2.13
0.375
5.21
0.549
4.19
0.499
0.382
0.32
4.7
5.16
0. 971
3.93
0.99
2.34
0.591
0.205
0.168
0.227
0.289
35.7
81.95
63.96
34.1
78
38.7
78.6
24.1
78.8
34.7
64.2
20.8
25.3
45.6
25.7
64.0
37.3
40.1
50.2
71.9
40.6
71.8
88.5
(%)
0.371
4Ara~n
K
(%)
(continued)
:[: Duplicate analysis. Key: atm, atmospheric; bt, biotite; hb, hornblende; msc, muscovite; rad, radiogenic; wr, whole rock.
7.06
74.92
CRSH/89/13A (hb)
7.651
12
6.997
201
CRSH/gg/4H (msc)
61.798
CRSH/89/4H (bt)
72.05
7.497
CRSH/89/4A (bt)
214 +
CCR/87/26E (bt)
74.353
CCR/87/26C (bt)
CCR/87/26C (hb)
CCR/87/26E (hb)
9.72
8.405
189
216
CRSI-I/89/4A (msc)
65.994
66.548
15.30
7.47
CRSH/89/'TA (bt)
CRSH/89/19 (msc)
CCR/87/25 (hb)
CCR/87/22E (hb)
CCR/87/26B (bt)
220 -I-
CCR/87/26B (hb)
32.94
8.45
76.941
213
207 _+
CRSH/g9/7A (msc)
48.492
14.82
11.08
7.04
5.68
CRSI-I/89]6D (msc)
211 +
CRSI-I/89/6C (msc)
54.375
CCR/87/22B (bt)
28.24
CCR/87/21G (hb)
6.26
647 _.+ 37
CRSH/89/6B (bt)
1.389
CCR/87/21G (bt)
75.43
0.05
CRSH/89/SB (hb)
34
CCR/87/20 (bt)
CCR/87/20 (hb)
CCR/87/21A (bt)
224 +
CCR/87/21A (lab)
88.72
0.07
0.602
74 +
76 +
CRSH/89]SA (hb)
1.080
81.36
1.051
0.358
76.17
0.358
CRSH/89/5B (hb)
15
:[:
72 +
CCR/87/19 (hb)
1.062
CCR/87/17 (hb)
CCR/87/18 (hb)
91.23
0.370
62 +
CRSI-I/89/5A (lab)
17.725
CCR/87/16H (hb)
43.42
7.26
69 _+
CRSH/89/14F (bt)
47.33
21.186
7.77
CRSH/89/14F (msc)
2
CCR/87/16C (hb)
50 _+
Sample No.
Zamora BathoUth
33.25
14.109
Age
(Ma)
7.09
40Arrad
(nl/g)
CRSH/89/14E (bt)
4Araan
(%)
Sample No.
K
(%)
Table 4 (continued)
3.49
1.230
1.331
15.53
2.688
39.87
4.172
29.34
3.562
2.208
2.363
34.2
32.78
6.036
24.32
6.134
15.77
4.356
1.581
1.602
1.776
2.107
2.009
(nl/g)
4SArrad
Age
14
10
10
21
151 +
187 +
193 :t:
178 +
176
187 +
186
172 +
175
143 -+
181 +
178 +
156 +
153 +
153 +
17
13
14
14
14
12
153 -+ 10
166 +
126 +
188 -+
230 +
191 +
178 +
134 +
(Ma)
O0
~D
~r
23.5
37.6
5.67
0.481
4.04
FV68 1 COt)
FV485 COb)
FV485
3.512
3.806
2.724
2.206
2.298
5.21
56.6
65.3
73.1
57.8
59.8
47.6
0.569
0.537
0.323
0.755
CCR/g7/6A (hb)
CC]R/B7/6A (bt)
CCR/g7f7 COb)
ADlVlL5 COb)
11.38
5.145
25.96
5.777
38.02
5.26
50.3
64.9
27.9
40.0
14.5
26.9
0.995
5.02
0.827
5.296
0.757
CCR/g7/IOA COb)
CCR/'87/10A COt)
CCR/87/IOB (hb)
CCR/87/10B COt)
ADMIA COb)
171
176
171
128
128 +
49
51
47
169
174
168
126
164
152
135
174
166 +
150
153
104
132
(Ma)
Age
12
10
0.996
0.409
4.08
1.04
4.72
0.371
4.27
0.363
FV83 COt)
2.31
CCR/87/13C (hb)
:~
CCR/g7/13B (hb)
CCR/gT/13A Cot)
CCR/87/13A COb)
Magtaydn Pluton
CCR/87/IC COt)
:1:
CCR/87/IC COb)
CCR/87/IA Cot)
:~
CCR/87/IA COb)
PtmamptroPluton
1
1
19
19 +
5.672
4.821
46.4
47.3
63.5
60.1
76.8
51.2
3.139
39
3
79
1.446
3.52
86 +
89
1.397
3
74 +
68
3.066
10.95
73 +
13.73
94 +
58.2
3
4
91 +
1.341
1.389
73 +
84 +
13.71
79 +
1.142
14.18
25 +
6.536
81 +
3
31 +
0.816
1.172
4
34
0.904
2O
Age
(Ma)
5.399
(hUg)
4eArmd
21.6
62.3
54.4
46.9
77.8
59.8
63.8
60.4
73.4
69.1
54.1
64.5
(%)
CCR/87/3 Cot)
6.629
0.679
6.41
7.81
6.95
(%)
4eArah.
-t
CCR/87/3 (hb)
SackaPluton
t-
CCR/87f2E Cot)
CCR/87/2C COt)
Chingual Batholi~
Sample No.
~. Duplicate analysis. Key: arm, atmospheric; bt, biotite; hb, hornblende; msc, muscovite; rad, radiogenic;, wr, whole rock.
4.706
11.79
57.5
37.2
2.54
5.914
CCR/S7/SE COt)
CCR/87/9 Cot)
,'L~0mt Batko//t/t
4.638
58.9
0.849
28.73
3.247
CCR/8715G (hb)
Abt~ua Ba~oU~
52.0
5.708
22.5
0.916
FV681 (hb)
COt)
19.29
15.9
4.64
RMI COt)
34.53
3.161
59.3
(hi/g)
~Armd
0.593
(%)
'teAr,,..
RM1 COb)
Sample No.
(gt)
Table 4 (continued)
O
O
.>
6.83
F V ~ CoO
17.57
58
CCR/87/27G Cot)
6.94
6.38
0.508
6.21
0.839
6.56
5.07
1.25
1.969
0.264
7.11
(91)
61.4
67.2
90.9
77.7
94.3
67.3
81.2
38.2
53.2
51.9
76.3
27.9
(~)
~Arjam
.$Duplicate analysis. Key: aim, atmospheric; bt, biotite;hb, hornblende; msc, muscovite, tad, radiogenic, wr, whole rock.
36.9
7.62
CCR/g7/29B (bt)
57 +
CCR/87/27F Cot)
16.08
CCR/87/27F (hb)
13.7
CCR/87/27C (bt)
7.18
61 4- 10
CCR/87/29A (b0
0.276
CCR/87/27C (hb)
Catumzyo P/uto~
88.29
0.12
61 4-
66 4-
CRSHJ89/I 7C (wr)
1.386
1.229
71.69
0.51
63.40
0.53
CRSH/89/17B (hb)
P o r ~ k u s l a Ba~olL~
CCR/87/12C (bt)
CCR/87/12C (hb)
CCR/87/12B (hbfot)
CCR/87/12A (hb/bt)
CCR/87/27A Cot)
CRSH/89/I 7A (hb)
59
61 +
66 4-
51 4-
52 +
15.8
1.70
63.8
35.8
1.82
69.8
37.7
Pungala Plu~n
0.702
9.85
9.71
35.0
FVI5 (hb)
4.84
58 4-
57 +
F V l l (b0
17.57
16.08
CRSH/89/15 Cot)
13.7
7.62
36.9
7.18
Sample No.
CCP./ST/2SB (b0
(hi/g)
CCR/g7f28A (bt)
Age
(Ma)
OArmd
Pt~tnal Pluton
4mAratm
(~)
P/uton
$dm L ~
Sample No.
K
(gb)
Table 4 (continued)
4.893
4.645
0.469
4.055
0.670
3.101
3.109
8.298
2.080
3.276
0.471
15.27
(nVg)
~Armd
~C
18 4-
19 4-
24 4-
17 4-
2O 4-
12 4-
12 4-
42 4-
42 4-
42 4-
45 4-
54
(Ma)
o"
92
a.
7-
6-
),(D
5-
Z
I~1
0
tkl
e,b.
4-
3-
2-
llO
120
130
140
150
ltSO
i70
liJ0
190
200
210
2='0
230
I
Fig. 4. Histogramof K-Ar mineralages listed in Table4 obtainedfrom the Zamorabatholith.
240M0
New geochronological control for the tectono-magmatic evolution of the metamorphic basement. Ecuador
youngest of which (i.e.. < ca. 140 Ma) are probably due to
subsequent argon loss during alteration and can therefore
be disregarded. Nevertheless, a careful appraisal of these
data can help to more closely constrainthe ratherimprecise
Rb-Sr results and provide extra insight into the development of the Zamora batholith.
In the La Paz area,threehornblende separates(CCR/87/
16H, 17. and 19) gave ages of 178 :I:10, 188 6. and 191
+ 10 Ma, in good agreement with the Rb-Sr age (187:1:2
Ma). A fiver boulder of coarse-grained porphyritic hornblende-feldspar andesite (CCR/87/18) gave an age of
around 230 Ma, suggesting the presence of older elements
within the batholith.
Near Paquisha. two c,o-existing pairs of hornblende and
biotite samples (CCR/87/21A and G) gave a remarkably
close cluster of ages with a mean of 154 :!: 3 Ma, which
must record the age of rapid cooling thro-sh the blocking
temperatures for these two rni~rals. This could suggest
either that the magma cooled sufficiently to set the Rb-Sr
clock at ca. 200 Ma but then remained! above the argon
blockin~ temperature for some 45 million years before final cooling, or that emplacement and cooling occurred at
ca. 200 Ma, followed by reheating to completely reset the
K-At in both hornblende and biotite at ca. 155 Ma, with
only minimal disturbance of the Rb-Sr system. Alternatively, and probably far more likely, it may suggest that the true
Rb-Sr age must lie at the lower limit of the error bar of the
isochron age (198 -4- 34 Ma) and that this intrusion is no
older than ca. 165/via.
Coexisting biotite and hornblende from samples defming the 246 :!: 17 Ma Rb-Sr age at Rio Pituca (CCR/87/22B
and E) gave concordant results, with a mean of 180 + 8 Ma,
in good agreement with both the K-Ar and Rb Sr results
from La Paz. Samples from the south of Palanda (CCR/87/
26B, C and E) again yielded good agreement for coexisting mineral pairs, with a mean of 179 + 5 Ma for three
pairs. This age is just within the error of the rather p o ~ RbSr date of 144:1:35 Ma and thus, in this case, could be interpreted to suggest that the true Rb-Sr age lies at the upper
limit of the error bars. However, the coincidence of this RbSr age with the K-Ar at Paqulsha could alternatively suggest the fairly common and well-documented phenomenon
of resetting of the Rb-Sr system by cool hydrothermal circulations during a ca. 150 Ma event that did not disturb the
K-At systems. Several other samples from the Zamora
batholith gave ages in the ranges ca. 180-190 Ma or 155160 Ma.
Thus. whatever the precise reasons for the patterns of
ages found in the Zamora batholith, a major isotopic event
clearly occurred at around 170-190 Ma, and there is a
strong suggestion of some activity as early as 230.250 Ma
in the Rio Pituca area and to the east of La Paz (Qda.
Cufishpe). A later event, particularly in the Paquisha area
and to the east of Palanda (FV681), occurred between ca.
150 and 160 Ma.
Along the Baflos-Puyo road, a weakly foliated, late epidote-beafing, leucocratic monzogranite of the Azafran
batholith gave a seven-point Rb-Sr isochron indicatingan
age of 120+ 5 Ma (Fig. 3i). However, the K-Ar data from
this area are more perplexing. Two biotite separates from
93
94
CONCLUSIONS
It is clear that the Cordillera Real has been subjected to
a complex succession of magmatic and tectonic events,
both localized and widespread, throughout much of Mesozoic and Cenozoic times. Both the Rb-Sr and the K-Ar isotope systems have been affected, and many of the ages are
poorly constrained. However, having used a combination
of isotopic methods, it has been possible, in most cases, to
distinguish between the various tectonic and magmatic
events and hence obtain a considerably better -nd_erstanding of the geological hist(xy of the Cordillera Real and El
Oro Province.
The pre-Mesozoic history remain.unknown. A number
of pre-Mesozoic K-Ar ages have been recorded, both in
previous publications and in this study. However, with the
exception of the Portovelo amphibolite, similar samples
taken frem the same locality gave very different ages. It
may be that some of these older ages are real, but they can
also be explained by disturbance of the K-Ar system, with
localized argc~ enrichment or preferential loss of potassium leading to spuriously old ages. Until more detailed
work is carried out in the respective localities, these ages
must remain suspect and should not be quoted in the literature as otherwise.
The earliest event recorded, based on reliable data, is the
metamorphism and magmatism within the Tahnin Group
of El Oro Province dated at 220-200 Ma (Late Triassic to
Early Jurassic). This has been clearly defined by both StaNd and K-Ar data.
There is a remarkable similarity between the garnet
gneisses of El Oro and those from Papallacta, Agoy~n, and
the Sabanilla subdivision in the Cordillera Real. Not rely
are the rocks all garnet biotite gneisses, but they also conabundant tabular graphite with typical shiny luster. It
is therefore possible that El Oro and the Cordillera Real
gneisses were ori$inally part of the same metamorphic
complex. The garnets from the Cordillera Real have not
fractionated the Sm-Nd isotopes, so we cannot prove that
they are of the same age, but the Rb-Sr data fron3 the
Sabanilla subdivision orthogneisses (Fig. 3a) do suggest
that a similar metamorphism occurred at approximately
220 Ma in the Cordillera Real.
The age of the Tres Lagunas subdivision is relatively
well-constrained at about 200 Ma. The initial 87Sr/~6Sr
ratio of 0.7120 (Fig. 3c) (and also of the Sabanilla orthogneiss, 0.7123) is considerably higher than that of the
Abitagua. Azafran, and Zamora granitoids (ca. 0,705) and
clearly indicates that the Tres Lagamas granite has had a
much greater crustal component involved in its genesis
than the other Ecuadorian granitoids. The Tres Lagunas
granite probably represents a crustal melt that formed during the 220-200 Ma metamorphic event.
The main intrusion of the typical Andean-type granitoids in both Ecuador (i.e., Zamora, Abitagua) and Colombia (Aapden et al., 1987) occurred between ca. 190 and 150
Ma (Middle-Late Jurassic); however, part of what is now
included within the Zamora batholith may have been eraplaced at ca. 240 Ma (Early Triassic), With the possible
exception of the emplacement of the Azafran monzogranite, only sporadic magmatism occurred between 150
and 90 Ma (Early Cretaceous). Most of the other plutous
that have been dated range between 80 and 40 Ma (Late
Cretaceous to early Tertiary).
One of the chief results of this study is documentation of
the Cretaceous to early Tertiary K-Ar reset mineral ages.
especially those recorded from the Cordillera Real. These
are represented by a histogram (Fig. 5), which also displays
the principal sedimentary/tectonic events revealed by the
sedimeutary record preserved in the Ofienteand along the
flanks of the Cordillera. Following the cessation of phitonism associated with the Zamora and Abitaqua batholith
at ca. 150 Ma, the Oriente and sub-Andean zones were deformed, uplifted, and eroded prior to the deposition of the
Hollin and Napo Formations (Baldock, 1982). The peak of
Early Cretaceous reset ages (ca. 135-125 Ma) (Fig. 5), obtained principally from the Abitagua, Azafran, and Zamora
batholiths,is interpretedto relateto this pre-Hollin event,
which is of regionalimportance,having also been identified in Colombia where itcorresponds to a period of accretion,widespread dynsmothermic metamorphism, and
blueschist emplacement along the Romeral fault zone
(Aspden et al., 1987; Aspden and McCourt, 1986). In
Ecuador, previously mentioned fieldevidence from Rio
Verde suggests thatthisEarly Cretaceous event included
an important component of transpressi~ai shearing along
steep-to-vertical NN~SW-trending ZOneS(see alSOAapden and Litherland. 1992).
The Aptian Hollin Formation (ca. 119-113 Ma) (Bristow and Hoffstetter. 1977) is overlain conformably by the
marine shales and limestones of the Napo Formation, and
both formations were deposited under relatively stable, epicontinental conditions (Baldock, 1982). After the upper
Napo was deposited, a major period of Campanian erosion
(ca. 83-73/via) took place in the Oriente (Baldock, 1982)
which, together with the subsequent deposition of the Tena
and Yunguilla Formations, c . x ~ d e s with the marked peak
in reset ages (ca. 85-65 Ma) obtained from the Cordillera
Real (Fig. 5). During this period, the Pimampiro and Mag-
New geochronological control for the tectono-magmatic evolution of the metamorphic basement. Ecuador
NON.I~ITION/
(~71 EROSION
EROSION
Co.QSMO
EROSION
C0,81.73Mo
~NON. D I r p O S I T I O N
Co.SS.SlMa
95
ERO$1ON/TUrCTONISM
Co, 145-120 Mo
FORMATION
UPPERAND MIDDLE NAPO
FORMATION
14
m~
la.J
oL
13
12
IO
>.CJ 8
Z
I~1
ah
o
55
45
55
65
75
e5
TERTIARY
95
IO5
115
135
145 Mo
CRETACEOUS
LATE
IZ5
EARLY
Fig. 5. Histogram of Cretaceous-earlyTertiaryreset/disturbedK Ar mineral ages from the Cordillera Real. showingtheir correlation
with eventspreservedin the sedimentaryrecord.K-At mineralages are listed in Table4 (see text for furtherexplanation).
tay~n plutons were emplaced (Table 4) but, in general, plutonic activity was apparently restricted.
The red bed Tena Formation, conf'med principally to the
eastern fl~nk.~of the Cordillera Real/sub-Andean zone, was
derived frown the west and is the chronostraligraphic correlative of the marine Maaslrichti~n (ca. 73-65 Ma) Yunguilla Formation Of the Cuenca area (Fig. 2b) (Baldock,
1982; Bristow and Hoffstetter, 1977). It thus seems reasonable to conclude that the widespread Late Q'etaceams disturbance of the K-At mineral ages relates to the uplift of the
Cordillexa Real. As with the pre-Hollin event, this disturbance has also been rect~iT~l in Colombia, where reset
agesrangmgfmm ca. 75 to 57 Ma recorded from the Central Cordillera have been correlated with the approach and
subsequent accretion of the allochthonous, oceanic WestSAES6:1/2-G
96
REFERENCES
Almeida, E E M. de, Hasui, Y., Brito Neves, B. B., and Fuck R. A.,
1981. Brazilian structural provinces: An introduction. Earth Science
Review 17, 1-29.
Aly, S., 1980. Petrologische Untersuchungen Plutonisheler Gesteine yon
Ecuador. Unpublished thesis, University of Tubingen, Germany.
Aspden, J. A., and Litherland, M., 1992. The geology of Mesozoic collisional history of the Cordillera Real, Ecuador. In: Andean Geodynamics (edited by R. A. Oliver ). Tectonophysics 205, 187-204.
Aspden, J. A., and McCourt, W. J., 1986. A Mesozoic oceanic terrane in
the Central Andes of Colombia. Geology 14, 415-418.
Aspden, J. A., McCourt, W. J. and Brook, M., 1987. Geometrical central
of subduction-related magmatism: The Mesozoic and Cenozoic plutonic history of western Colombia. Journal of the Geological Society
of London 144, 893-905.
Baldock, J. W., 1982. Mapa y Bolet[n de la Explicaci6n del Mapa
Geol6gico de la Repablica del Ecuador, 1:1,000.000. Ministerio de
Recursos Naturales y Energ6ficos, Direcci6n General de Geologfa y
Minas, Quito, Ecuador, 54 p.
Bourgois, J., Eguez, A., Butterlin, J., and Dewever, E, 1990. Evolution
dynamique de la Cordillera Occidentale des Andes d'Equateur: La
d6couverte de la formation 6ocene d'Apagua. Comptes Rendus de
l'Acad~mie des Sciences. Paris 311 (ID, 173-180.
Bristow, C. R., and Hoffstetter, R., 1977. Lexique Stratigraphique International (2nd Ed.). Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique,
Paris, France.
Cobbing, E. J., Pitcher, W. S., Wilson, J. J., Baldock, J. W., Taylor, W. E,
McCourt, W., and Shelling, N. J. 1981. The Geology of the Western
Cordillera of Northern Peru. Institute of Geological, Sciences, Overseas Memoir 5, 143 p.
Daly, M. C., 1989. Correlation between NazcalFarallon plate kinematics
and forearc basin evolution in Ecuador. Tectonics 8, 769-790.
Evernden, J., 1961. Edades absolutas de algunas rocas igneas en Bolivia.
Noticiero de la Sociedad Geol6gica Boliviana 2, 3.
Feininger, T., 1978. Maim Geol6gico (1:50,000) de la Parte Occidental
de la Provincia de E10ro. Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Quito,
Ecuador.
Feininger, T., 1980. Eclogite and related high-pressure regional metamorphic rocks from the Andes of Ecuador. Journal of Petrology 21, I07140.
Feininger, T., 1982. The metamorphic basement of Ecuador. Bulletin of
the Geological Society of America 93, 87-92.
Feininger, T., and Seguin, M. K., 1983. Simple Bouguer gravity anomaly
field and the inferred crustal structure of continental Ecuador. Geology 11, 40-44.
Feininger, T., and Silberman, M. L., 1982. K-Ar Geochronology of Basement Rocks on the Northern Flank of the Huancabamba Deflection,
Ecuador. U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 82-206.
Gonssens, P. J., and Rose, W. I., 1973. Chemical composition and age
determination of tholeiitic rocks in the Basic Igneous Complex,
Ecuador. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 84, 10431052.
Hall, M., and Calle, L, 1982. ~ n o l o g i c a l
control for the main tectonic-magmatic events of Ecuador. Earth Science Review lg, 215239.
Henderson, W. G., 1979. Cretaceous to Eocene volcanic arc activity in
the Andes of northern Ecuador. Journal of the Geological Society of
London 136, 367-378.
Herbert, H. J., and Pichler, H., 1983. K-Ar ages of rocks from the eastern
Cordillera of Ecuador. Zeischrifl der Deutsche Geologische Gesellschafl 134, 483-493.
laillard, E., Doler. P., Carlier, G., and Mourier, T., 1990. Evolution of the
northern and central Andes during early to middle Mesozoic times; a
Tethyan model. Journal of the Geological Society of London 147,
1009-1022.
Kennerley, J. B., 1980. Outline of the Geology of Ecuador. British Geological Survey, Overseas Geology and Mineral Resources 55, 20 p.
Lebrat, M., Megard, E, Juteau, T., and Calles, J., 1985. Pre-orogenic volcanic assemblages and structures in the Western Cordillera of Ecuador between lx 40"S and 2x 20'S. Geologische Rundschau 74, 343351.
Litherland, M., Aspden, J. A., Bermudez, R., Viteri, E, and Pozo, M.,
1990. The Geology and Mineral Potential of the Cordillera Real,
Ecuador. INEMIN (Quito) and British Geological Survey (Keyworth), INEMIN-Misi6n Britfmlea, Open File Report (unpublished),
111 p.
McCourt, W. 1, Aspden, J. A., and Brock, M., 1984. New geological and
geochronological data from the Colombian Andes: Continental
growth by multiple accretion. Journal of the Geological Society of
London 141, 831-845.
Steiger, R. H., and Jager, E., 1977. Subcommission on Geochronology:
Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronolog),. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36, 359-62.
Tschopp, H. J., 1953. Oil exploration in the Oriente of Ecuador. Bulletin
of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 37, 23032347.
Van Thournout, E, and Quevedo, L. 1990. Allochthonous terranes in
northwestern Ecuador. Abstracts, International Symposium "Geodynamique Andi ne'" (Grenoble, France), 203-205.