Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biombioe
article info
abstract
Article history:
Molasses are a potential feedstock for ethanol production. The successful application of
anaerobic fermentation for ethanol production from molasses is critically dependent to the
development and the use of high rate bioreactors. In this study the fermentation of sugar
16 October 2012
stirred tank reactor (CSTR), an immobilised cell reactor (ICR) and a membrane reactor
(MBR) was investigated. Ethanol production and reactor productivities were compared
under different dilution rates (D). When using the CSTR, a decent ethanol productivity (Qp)
Keywords:
of 6.8 g L1 h1 was obtained at a dilution rate of 0.5 h1. The Qp was improved by 48% and
Molasses
the residual sugar concentration was reduced by using the ICR. Intensifying the production
Ethanol
of ethanol was investigated in the MBR to achieve a maximum ethanol concentration and
Productivity
a Qp of 46.5 g L1 and 19.2 g L1 h1, respectively. The achieved results in the MBR worked
CSTR
with high substrate concentration are promising for the scale up operation.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ICR
MBR
1.
Introduction
In the past decades, natural energy resources such as petroleum have been consumed at high rates. Therefore, alternative resources as ethanol are becoming more important [1,2].
Microbial ethanol production has been considered as renewable fuel for future contributing to the reduction of environmental impacts [3e5]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most
useful microorganism for the ethanol production by the
alcoholic fermentation of various raw materials rich in sugars
[6]. Molasses is an agro-industrial by-product often used in
alcohol distilleries due to the presence of fermentative sugars,
being an optimal carbon source for the microorganism
metabolism [7]. The use of molasses generated during the
process of sugar cane refining has attracted great interest
26
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
2.
2.1.
2.2.
Laboratory reactors configurations and operating
conditions
Three types of reactors were used to carry out the continuous
fermentation at 30 C (CSTR: Fig. 1, ICR: Fig. 2 and MBR: Fig. 3).
The fermentation in the CSTR was conducted in a 1 L Biolafit fermentor using a pre-culture of 200 mL seeded in
a medium with a sugar concentration of 50 g L1. An aerated
batch phase for 48 h was provided to produce a sufficient
concentration of biomass of 18 g L1. At the end of the batch
phase, the continuous culture was conducted in anaerobic
conditions to ensure the fermentation. The CSTR was fed with
a sugar concentration of 100 g L1. Different dilution rates
were tested. A D of 0.12 h1 (run 1) was applied during the first
246 h of monitoring, a D of 0.25 h1 (run 2) was applied from
time 246 h to time 415 h and a D of 0.5 h1 (run 3) was applied
during the last 85 h of work.
The fermentation set-up of the ICR was comprised of
a Biorad column packed with beads of immobilised cells. The
immobilisation of S. cerevisiae was performed by the enriched
cells cultured media harvested at the exponential growth
phase. The fixed cell loaded ICR was carried out at initial stage
of operation and the cell were entrapped by calcium alginate
(2%) [6,8]. The fermentation in the ICR has been done over
a period of 225 h. Ds were adapted to 0.12, 0.25 and 0.5 h1,
respectively.
The MBR system (YUASA Membrane Systems: ED-03SPH) is
composed of two reactors: the fermentation tank and
a membrane tank (1 L each) maintained in anaerobic conditions. A recirculation of flux was maintained between the
fermentation tank and the membrane tank with a high flow
rate to maintain similar conditions in both tanks in terms of
mixed liquor total suspended solids. Then, the dilution rate
was calculated using the 2 L total volume of the fermentor and
the membrane unit. The filtration unit consisted of an external
filtration module with a nominal cut-off filter of 0.4 mm and
a filtration surface of 0.014 m2. The maximum allowable
pressure drop over the filter was 4 bars. The start-up of the MBR
culture was provided from the outlet of the CSTR with an initial
biomass concentration of 8 g L1 and a pH of 4.8. The
fermentation tank was loaded with an initial sugar concentration of 100 g L1. The system was operated 245 h without
cleaning resulting in a membrane flux of 21.4e35.7 L h1 m1.
There has been a decrease in the permeate flow over time
CO2
Feed Tank
Pump
Fermenter
Pump
Product Tank
27
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
Valve
Pump
Valve
Feed Tank
2.4.
Product Tank
Pump
2.3.
Technical analysis
Statistical analysis
3.
3.1.
(Permeate)
(Concentration)
Permeate Tank
CO2
P
(V)
Feed Tank
Feed Pump
Fermenter
Circulation
Pump
(V)
(V)
(V)
Circulation
Tank
Circulation
Pump
Membrane
Fig. 3 e Schematic of the laboratory scale membrane bioreactor (P [ pressure measurement and V [ valve).
28
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
0,6
50
0,5
40
0,4
30
0,3
20
0,2
10
0,1
0
0
Biomass concentration
(g L-1)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
D (h-1)
60
0
500
Time (h)
20
18
5,5
5
16
4,5
14
12
3,5
10
3
2,5
pH and D (h-1)
1,5
0,5
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0
500
Time (h)
Fig. 4 e Evolution of (a): total reducing sugar (TRS) (>), ethanol (B), (b): biomass (>) and pH (B) during CSTR fermentation of
sugar cane molasses under different Ds (D).
29
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
3.2.
3.3.
60
50
5
4,5
40
4
3,5
30
3
2,5
20
D (h-1) and pH
5,5
2
1,5
10
1
0,5
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
0
225
Time (h)
Fig. 5 e Evolution of total reducing sugar (TRS) (>), ethanol (,) concentrations and pH (D) during ICR fermentation of sugar
cane molasses under different Ds (B).
30
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Time (h)
60
8
7
50
6
40
5
4
30
20
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
2
10
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
3.4.
240
Time (h)
Table 1 e Performances of the CSTR, ICR and MBR bioreactors used for the ethanol production at different dilution rates.
Reactors
CSTR
1
Dilution rate D (h )
Ethanol concentration (g L1)
Productivity: Qp (g L1 h1)
Substrate inlet (g L1)
Substrate outlet (g L1)
Sugar consumption: Ys (%)
Biomass in the reactor (g L1)
YP/S yield (g ethanol
g substrate1)
ICR
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 1
Run 2
0.12
27.9 1.9
3.34 0.2
100
18.3 1.7
81.7 2.1
4.8 0.4
0.34 0.01
0.25
21.6 1.9
5.4 0.3
100
31.1 2.9
68.9 2.4
4.9 0.16
0.31 0.01
0.5
11.6 1.6
6.8 0.3
100
51.5 1.2
48.5 1.8
2.4 0.13
0.24 0.01
0.12
44.06 1.9
5.28 0.2
100
2.9 0.4
97.1 3.2
e
0.45 0.02
0.25
32 1.1
8.0 0.4
100
9.6 0.6
90.4 4.1
e
0.35 0.01
MBR
Run 3
0.5
20.2
10.1
100
26.8
73.2
e
0.27
0.6
0.6
1
3.8
0.01
Run 1
Run2
0.31e0.5
41.4 1.8
12.83e19.2
100
2.3 0.2
97.7 2.8
8.4e26.7
0.42 0.02
0.31
46.5 1.5
14.41 0.6
100
0.7 0.1
99.3 2.9
26.13e41.1
0.46 0.01
e
0.0032
0.0061
0.004
0.0012
e
0.0056
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
4.
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the Ministry of Superior
Education and Scientific Research and Technology, which has
facilitated the carried work.
Abbreviations
CSTR
continuously stirred tank reactor
D
dilution rate (h1)
ICR
immobilised cell reactor
MBR
membrane bioreactor
OD
optic density
m max (mu-max) maximum specific growth rate (h1)
ORP
oxidation reduction potential (mV)
Qp
ethanol productivity (g L1 h1)
TRS
total reduced sugars (g L1)
mass ratio between ethanol and sugar (g g1)
YP/S
WTW
WTW GmbH, Weilhem, Germany
Ys
substrate conversion yield (%)
31
references
32
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 4 8 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 2 5 e3 2
[19] Menezes JC, Alves SS, Lemos JM, Azevedo SF. Sugar
analysis of industrial penicillin fermentation broths
containing complex nutrient sources. Biotechnol Tech
1992;6(1):1e4.
[20] StatSoft Inc. Statistica for windows, computer program
manual; 1997. Tulsa.
[21] Tang Y, An M, Liu K, Nagai S, Shigematsu T, Morimura S,
et al. Ethanol production from acid hydrolysate of wood
biomass using the flocculating yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain KF-7. Process Biochem 2006;41(4):909e14.
[22] Taherzedeh MJ, Millati R, Niklasson C. Continuous
cultivation of dilute acid hydrolysates to ethanol by