Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
399]
Ground improvement comprises approximately 30 different methods of ground treatment, including modification,
chemical alteration, reinforcement with steel or geosynthetic, strengthening by drainage, densification by vibration or consolidation, the use of electro-osmosis, and the
use of the observational technique. This paper attempts
to highlight influential papers published in Geotechnique
since 1947, and urges the reader to seek these out.
Descriptions are given of those papers considered to be
most influential, ranging from the densification of soils at
Cape Kennedy in the USA to the construction of a 41 m
high reinforced soil wall in South Africa. The use of
vibro-compaction and vibro-replacement techniques has
featured significantly, as has consolidation using vertical
drains. The importance of observational techniques and
their relationship to ground improvement has also received great attention in Geotechnique. A summary of
papers is also presented in a table to provide a quick
reference tool.
KEYWORDS: consolidation; ground improvement; historical
review; observational method; reinforced soil; vertical drains;
vibro-compaction
INTRODUCTION
Ground improvement techniques have developed greatly over
the 60 years for which Geotechnique has been in existence.
There are now over 30 ground improvement techniques. For
most of these, there are variations that extend the versatility
of the basic technique. Also, many are used in combination,
and the scope for innovation is huge. Ground improvement
is used both for temporary works, and for short-term and
long-term applications.
Mitchell & Jardine (2002) observed that
399
400
Casagrande
(1949)
1957 1966
19671976
19771986
Bjerrum et al.
(1967)
Reinforced soil
Lime/cement stabilisation
Sherwood
(1957)
Surcharging
Tomlinson
(1956)
19972007
Su & Wang
(2003)
Zornberg (2002)
Rowe (2002)
Boardman et al.
(2001)
Larsson et al.
(2005)
Tomlinson &
Wilson (1973)
Vertical drains
Observational method
Peck (1969)
Vibro-replacement
Hughes et al.
(1975)
McKenna et al.
(1975)
Menard &
Broise (1975)
Dynamic compaction
19871996
Groundwater control
Vacuum consolidation
Explosive compaction
Lime/cement columns
VIBRATORY TECHNIQUES
Vibro stone columns
The formation of columns of compacted stone in the
ground using a heavy vibrating poker to displace the in situ
ground and to compact the imported material is referred to
as vibro stone columns or vibro-replacement (Watts, 2000).
There are several ways to design stone columns. The currently used design methods for bearing capacity are mostly
refinements of work carried out about 30 years ago by
Baumann & Bauer (1974) and Hughes & Withers (1974). For
settlement calculations Baumann & Bauer, and also Priebe
(1995), are widely used. At the time of the first Symposium
in Print, the state of knowledge of how deep compaction
techniques work was relatively primitive, and several of the
papers addressed this (Charles, 2002). Two of these are
considered influential in the development of the design and
testing of stone columns, and are discussed below.
Hughes et al. (1975) described a case history of the plate
loading of an isolated stone column in soft clay on Canvey
Island in Essex. The soft clay was 9 m thick and overlay a
medium dense silty sand. The stone columns were 10 m long
and penetrated through the soft clay into the much stiffer
silty sand. This paper is important, because the behaviour of
the column in this field trial proved to be in accordance with
the behaviour predicted by the theory proposed by Hughes
& Withers (1974). As noted above, this theory is still widely
used for the design of stone columns.
Watson et al.
(1984)
Davies &
Humpheson
(1981)
Hansbo et al.
(1981)
McGown &
Hughes (1981)
Nicholson &
Jardine (1981)
Choa (1994)
Teh & Houlsby
(1991)
Choa (1994)
Almeida et al.
(2000)
Long &
ORiordan
(2001)
Nash & Ryde
(2001)
Hird & Moseley
(2000)
Hammond &
Thorn (1994)
Choa (1994)
Renton-Rose et
al. (2000)
Hansbo (1996)
Roberts &
Preene (1994)
Almeida et al.
(2000)
Gohl et al.
(2000)
Larsson et al.
(2005)
McKenna et al. (1975) described an apparently unsuccessful application of ground improvement. It is a case history of
stone columns supporting a widespread loadin this case a
trial embankment. This was built as part of the design studies
for a section of the M5 motorway in Somerset. To investigate
the effectiveness of stone columns in reducing the settlement
of high embankments built on soft alluvium, vibro-replacement stone columns constructed using the wet process were
installed under one end of a trial embankment. The columns
were about 11 m long, but did not penetrate the full thickness of the alluvium. The embankment was up to nearly 8 m
high. The foundations were instrumented, and a comparison
of the improved and unimproved ground showed that the
columns apparently had no effect on the amount or rate of
settlement of the embankment. This paper stimulated discussion at the symposium and further research into the reasons
for the poor performance of the ground treatment. It was
concluded that the reasons postulated were probably incorrect, and that the explanation was more complicated. The
columns had probably performed as rigid friction piles,
which had been punched into the clay because it had been
remoulded to a very low strength by the column installation
process. The widespread load contained the clay stratum,
preventing column bulging at any depth and so allowing
stress transfer down the columns (Greenwood, 1991).
These two case histories of a single loaded column and a
group of columns under widespread load demonstrate the
401
402
compression and/or temporary stabilising berms, as described by Long & ORiordan (2001). This is a case history
of the construction of embankments up to 8 m high over
very soft and highly compressible clay for the new bypass at
Athlone in the Republic of Ireland. Long & ORiordan also
described investigative work using a piezocone to determine
the increase in undrained shear strength in soft clay beneath
an embankment nine years after its construction. They observed an increase approximately equal to 0.22 3 vertical
effective stress (which is consistent with the work published
by Mesri, 1989).
Vacuum preloading
The principle of vacuum preloading is the application of
atmospheric pressure to form a temporary surcharge for soft
clays while applying a vacuum to the surface of the soil
beneath a membrane. It was developed in Sweden in the
1950s. Vacuum preloading provides a good example of the
interaction of theory and practice, because it requires both a
good understanding of the soil behaviour, and appropriate
tools and techniques (Charles, 2002). The paper by Chu et
al. (2000) is a case history of a 50 ha site in Tianjin in
China, where vacuum preloading was used to precompress a
20 m thick deposit of soft clay by 1 m.
THE OBSERVATIONAL METHOD IN GROUND
IMPROVEMENT
An observational approach has long been applied to piling
and ground improvement works, although it had never been
403
404
tions, CIRIA Report 185. London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association.
Nicholson, D. P. & Jardine, R. J. (1981). Field behaviour of vertical
drains at Queenborough Bypass. Geotechnique 31, No. 1,
6790.
Peck, R. B. (1969). Ninth Rankine Lecture: Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics.
Geotechnique 19, No. 2, 171187.
Priebe, H. J. (1995). The design of vibro replacement. Ground
Engng 28, No. 12, 3137.
Raison, C. A. (1996). Discussion. In The observational method in
geotechnical engineering, pp. 175179. London: Thomas Telford.
Renton-Rose, D., Bunce, G. C. & Finlay, D. W. (2000). Vibroreplacement for industrial plant on reclaimed land, Bahrain.
Geotechnique 50, No. 6, 727737; Discussion. 52, No. 10, 764.
Roberts, T. O. L. & Preene, M. (1994). The design of groundwater
control systems using the observational method. Geotechnique
44, No. 4, 727734.
Rowe, R. K. (2002). Behaviour of reinforced embankments on soft
rate-sensitive soils. Geotechnique 52, No. 1, 2940.