Learning Professional Confidence: Linking Teaching Practices,

Students' Self-Perceptions, and Gender

Carol L. Colbeck, Alberto F. Cabrera, Patrick T. Terenzini
From: The Review of Higher Education
Volume 24, Number 2, Winter 2001
pp. 173-191 | 10.1353/rhe.2000.0028

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The Review of Higher Education 24.2 (2000) 173-191

[Access article in PDF]

Learning Professional Confidence:

Linking Teaching Practices, Students' Self-Perceptions, and Gender
Carol L. Colbeck, Alberto F. Cabrera, and Patrick T. Terenzini
[Tables]

For too long, college and university faculty have focused their instructional efforts on their own teaching
performance. As a result, faculty have paid insufficient attention to ways they might successfully
encourage students' motivation and self-confidence (Barr & Tagg, 1995). Because the undergraduate
attrition rates in science and engineering are high for both women and men (National Science
Foundation, 1996), there is particular concern that teaching methods still prevalent in these fields may
alienate students (Adelman, 1998). [End Page 173]
Undergraduate student attrition rates remain high from science and engineering programs even as
demand for degreed workers in these fields outstrips supply in the United States and around the world
(National Science and Technology Council, 2000). Historically, white males have comprised the majority
of the engineering and science workers, but this group is declining as a proportion of the total U.S.
workforce. In the last quarter century, increasing participation of women and minorities has helped
prevent a severe shortage of science and engineering workers; but if current rates of gender and ethnic
participation in these bachelor degree programs do not change, the number of qualified workers will soon
be inadequate to meet the science, technology, and engineering needs of our society. A recent report
from the National Science and Technology Council (2000) asserts that enlarging the science, technology,
and engineering talent pool depends on "encouraging greater participation of all ethnic and gender
groups" (p. 4).
Efforts to recruit a more diverse student body will not solve the workforce gap if retention rates in science
and engineering degree programs remain low. Students' classroom experiences are critical to their
persistence. Prior research shows that female students perceive science and engineering instruction as

too competitive and that both male and female students regard science and engineering faculty as
unresponsive and unmotivating (Strenta et al., 1994; see also Sax, this issue, for a study of gender
differences in graduate science programs). More than one-third of the students who leave science and
engineering cite poor teaching as their primary reason for changing majors (Seymour & Hewitt, 1997).
It is not surprising that poor teaching negatively affects students' persistence in engineering and science.
But what encourages students to stay? This study investigated how classroom practices contribute to
female and male undergraduates' positive perceptions of themselves as students and as future
professionals. Improved understanding of the link between teaching practices and students' selfperceptions may guide efforts to increase learning and persistence.
Self-efficacy is the expectation that one can accomplish specific behaviors necessary to produce a
desired outcome (Bandura, 1986). Most research on college students' self-efficacy and other selfperceptions has focused on the extent to which self-perceptions affect educational outcomes (Pajares,
1996). For example, college students' self-perceptions influence their cognitive [End Page
174]engagement (Pajares & Miller, 1994), their academic performance, choices of majors and careers
(Drew, 1996; Hackett & Betz, 1992; Sax, 1994a), and their intent to persist in science and engineering
(Seymour & Hewitt, 1997). A meta-analysis of 39 studies found that self-efficacy beliefs account for about
14 percent of the variance in students' academic performance and 12 percent of the variance in their
academic persistence (Multon, Brown, & Lent, 1991).
Student self-perceptions are better predictors of academic performance than objective measures of ability
(Hackett et al., 1992; Pajares & Miller, 1994). Gender apparently is related to the accuracy of selfperceptions (Bandura, 1986; Pajares 1996). Even when college women have higher SAT scores or
grades than men, they are more likely than college men to underestimate their objectively measured math
abilities (Drew, 1996; Felder et al., 1995). This underestimation has a negative effect on women's
performance and persistence (Meece & Courtney, 1992; Pajares & Miller, 1994).
Although we know that self-perceptions are related to student performance and persistence, relatively
little research has been conducted about the sources...

If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that

supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to
Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.

o
o

You are not currently authenticated.

View freely available titles: Book titles OR Journal titles

Purchase/rental options available:

Purchase from JHU Press

Research Areas

Education > Higher Education

Recommend

Email a link to this page

Send

Frequently Downloaded
View Citation
Save Citation

Related Content

On Changing Neckties: A Few Remarks on the Art of Teaching

The Massive Open Online Course Movement, xMOOCs, and Faculty Labor

Students' Perceptions of Their Classroom Participation and Instructor as a Function of Gender and
Context

You have access to this content

Free sample

Open Access

Restricted Access

Welcome to Project MUSE

Use the simple Search box at the top of the page or the Advanced Search linked from the top of the page
to find book and journal content. Refine results with the filtering options on the left side of the Advanced
Search page or on your search results page. Click the Browse box to see a selection of books and
journals by: Research Area, Titles A-Z, Publisher, Books only, or Journals only.