Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Question time at the formal Council Meeting will be limited to written questions received before
12 noon on the day of the meeting. The questions will be read by a Council representative and
answered by the Mayor. There will not be an opportunity for questions to be asked from the
floor
VENUE:
Reception Room,
Bendigo Town Hall,
Hargreaves Street, Bendigo
NEXT MEETING:
Wednesday 20 July 2016
Bendigo Town Hall
Copies of the City of Greater Bendigo Councils Agendas & Minutes
can be obtained online at www.bendigo.vic.gov.au
PAGE 1
Council Values
Council wants the community to continue to have reason to be proud of the city and will
do this through:
Themes
1.
2.
3.
Productivity
4.
Sustainability
5.
PAGE 2
ORDINARY MEETING
WEDNESDAY 29 JUNE 2016
ORDER OF BUSINESS:
ITEM
PRECIS
PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY
PRAYER
PRESENT
APOLOGIES
CR CHAPMAN'S REPORT
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1.
1.1
2.
13
2.1
13
3.
23
3.1
23
4.
26
4.1
26
4.2
47
4.3
55
PAGE 3
4.4
51 HANNANS ROAD, MANDURANG SOUTH 3551 REFUSAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SUBDIVIDE
LAND INTO 2 LOTS
64
4.5
73
4.6
84
4.7
98
5.
104
5.1
104
5.2
116
5.3
121
5.4
126
6.
SUSTAINABILITY
133
6.1
133
6.2
139
7.
141
7.1
RECORD OF ASSEMBLIES
141
7.2
145
8.
NOTICES OF MOTION
146
8.1
146
9.
URGENT BUSINESS
154
10.
COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
154
11.
MAYOR'S REPORT
154
PAGE 4
12.
154
13.
154
APPENDIX / ATTACHMENTS
____________________________
CRAIG NIEMANN
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PAGE 5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY
PRAYER
PRESENT
APOLOGIES
PAGE 6
1.
2.
In the event that the same or similar written question is raised by more than one
person, an answer may be given as a combined response.
3.
In the event that time does not permit all written questions registered to be
answered, questions will be answered in writing or referred to the next meeting if
appropriate.
4.
The Mayor and or CEO have the right to decline registration on basis of:
Legal proceedings;
More appropriately addressed by other means;
Vague or lacking in substance, irrelevant, frivolous, insulting offensive,
improper, defamatory or demeaning;
Answer likely to compromise his / her position;
Confidential, commercial-in-confidence.
5.
Each individual whose written question has been accepted or declined will be
advised by early afternoon on the day of the scheduled meeting.
6.
In the event of a written question being declined the question will be circulated to
the Council for information.
PAGE 7
A Councillor who has declared a conflict of interest, must leave the meeting and
remain outside the room while the matter is being considered, or any vote is taken.
Councillors are also encouraged to declare circumstances where there may be a
perceived conflict of interest.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Wednesday 15 June 2016.
The following items were considered at the Special Council meeting held on 15 June
2016 at 5:00pm
The unconfirmed minutes have also been posted on the City of Greater Bendigo website
pending confirmation at this meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council held on 15 June, 2016 as circulated,
be taken as read and confirmed.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 15 June, 2016 as circulated,
be taken as read and confirmed.
PAGE 8
Council Plan
1.
COUNCIL PLAN
1.1
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
This report outlines the minor changes that have been recommended and incorporated in
the draft Council Plan 2013-2017 (2016-2017 update) following the feedback received
during the period for submissions on the draft, as well as further minor internal
refinements in parallel with budget deliberations, feedback from staff members and
editorial review.
Policy Context
In accordance with Section 125 of the Local Government Act 1989 a new Council Plan
must be prepared every four years and then a review of the Council Plan is undertaken
at least yearly.
This plan will cover the 2016-2017 financial year and this will be the final phase in the
2013-2017 Council Plan cycle. This 2016-2017update incorporates the changes
recommended by Council in their annual review of the Plan and the new actions that
have been endorsed and funded for the 2016-2017 year.
In accordance with legislative requirements the draft Council Plan has been made
available for Public Exhibition and submissions for a period of 30 days, prior to the
Council meeting for adoption of the Plan.
The revised Council Plan 2013-2017 (2016-2017 update) must be adopted by Council
prior to June 30, 2016 following the period of public exhibition and final consideration of
any changes arising.
Background Information
The Council Plan 2016-2017 Draft for Exhibition was considered by Council at its
meeting on 4 May, 2016 and Council resolved to advertise it for public exhibition and
submissions. The exhibition period was conducted from May 6 until June 3, 2016
A Committee of the Whole Council heard 1 or the 3 submissions received on the
proposed Council Plan on 7 June, 2016.
PAGE 9
Council Plan
To date:
Community members were invited to a public discussion session about future Council
priorities that was held following the public launch of the 2014-2015 Annual Report on
29 October, 2015. Suggestions from community members were collated and provided
to Councillors as Proposed New Initiatives requiring decision in the first draft of
actions in the Council Plan.
The format for the front section of the plan is largely unchanged, but the wording of
each section has been updated where necessary.
The Council Plan is based around five broad themes; these have remained
unchanged; the Strategic Objectives and Objectives have been reviewed and some
small changes made.
The process of refining priority actions was conducted in parallel with budget
discussions.
The Council Plan 2016-2017 Draft for Exhibition was considered by Council at its
meeting on 4 May, 2016. The exhibition period was conducted from 6 May until 3
June, 2016.
Council met at a Forum on Tuesday, 7 June to hear and consider the submissions.
Recommendations for changes to the draft plan were made at the Council Forum
meeting on 8 June, 2016. Changes have been made in accordance with Council
recommendations made at that meeting.
Relevant changes to the Financial Statements have also been made following
submissions on the draft Budget.
Report
The following section contains a summary of the main points made by the submitters
accompanied by some background information from City staff.
Having heard the submissions, and internal staff changes the Councillors agreed that:
Theme One be re-ordered and the following additional actions be included:
3.1.6 Negotiate with La Trobe University to finalise the long term future for ownership,
management and upgrade of the Athletics Track.
5.2.6 Develop a strategic direction for a long term management plan for Bendigo's
historical artefacts and the conservation of the Bendigo Historical Society
collection, which incorporates interim steps as required.
The following actions be amended to read as follows:
PAGE 10
Council Plan
PAGE 11
Council Plan
were provided with an opportunity to make a very presentation. These were heard and
considered by Council.
Conclusion
The final version of the Council Plan (2016-2017 update) has been prepared in
accordance with legislated requirements.
Resource Implications
Each action included in the Council Plan has been based on budget availability.
Preparation of the Council Plan is undertaken using existing budget allocations.
Attachments
1.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council resolve to adopt the Council Plan 2013-2017
(2016-2017 update).
PAGE 12
Budget 2016/17
2.
BUDGET 2016/17
2.1
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
To consider the formal adoption of the 2016/17 Budget.
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013-2017 (2015/16 Update):
Legislative Requirements
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1989, Council must:
Prepare a budget for each financial year commencing 1 July (Section 127).
Declare the amount it intends to raise by general rates (Section 158).
Comply with guidelines established under Sec 161; Ministerial Guidelines for
Differential Rating.
Give notice of the proposed budget and consider any submissions prior to adopting
the budget.
Adopt a Strategic Resource Plan not later than 30 June (Section 126).
Background Information
The draft Council Plan 2013 - 2017 (updated 2016-2017) includes a Strategic Resource
Plan (SRP) that provides a financial framework for meeting the objectives established in
the Council Plan. The key objective of the SRP is to achieve the Council's strategic
objectives, while ensuring financial sustainability in the medium to long term.
The 2016/17 Budget has been developed based on the SRP, to facilitate the
achievement of the Annual Actions listed in the Council Plan. A review of the Council
Plan was undertaken which informed the Budget content.
PAGE 13
Budget 2016/17
4.2
4.3
PLANNING SCHEME
AMENDMENT C161 MARONG BUSINESS PARK
CONSIDER PANEL REPORT
AND ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENT
BIG HILL MANDURANG
VALLEY LANDSCAPE
ASSESSMENT PLANNING
SCHEME AMENDMENT
C217
PLANNING SCHEME
AMENDMENT C220 LANSELL CREST
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
OVERLAY TO CONSIDER
AUTHORISATION REQUEST
PAGE 14
Revenue/Exp.
Budget Impact
155
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Budget 2016/17
4.5
5.1
5.3
6.1
Heathcote
Independent Living
Estate
Byambee Rises
Local Playspace
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Error!
Bookmark not
defined.
Rev $40,0000
Exp $(40,000)
Rev $75,000
Hard Court
Infrastructure
Renewal Plan
Rev $30,000
Financial
Assistance Grant
Rev $254,000
Rev $ 3,000,000
Bendigo Tennis
Pavilion
Construction
PAGE 15
$NIL
$NIL
Exp $(75,000)
$(30,000)
Exp $(60,000)
$254,000
Exp $(0)
Exp $(4,000,000)
$NIL
Budget 2016/17
Rev $0
$(150,000)
Exp $(150,000)
Heathcote Pool
solar/shade project
Rev $0
Bendigo Science
and Technology
Museum
Rev $0
Loddon Mallee
Community
Leadership
Program (LMCLP)
Rev $0
Bendigos History
Strategic report
Rev $0
Rev $0
Bendigo
Community Sister
Cities Committee
$(15,000)
Exp $(15,000)
$(10,000)
Exp $(10,000)
$(7,500)
Exp $(7,500)
$(15,000)
Exp $(15,000)
$(3,000)
Exp $(3,000)
Budget Details:
The key features of the 2016/17 Budget are:
1. Capital and Major Works of $100.61M.
During 2016/17, Council will continue to deliver on commitments to undertake
significant capital projects which improve the liveability of the City. These include the
completion of the Social Pavilion at Canterbury Park, Eaglehawk; Barrack Reserve
Social Pavilion, Heathcote; Bridge and Road reconstruction, Scott Street White Hills;
Garden for the Future at the Bendigo Botanic Gardens; Bendigo Airport Runway
reconstruction and extension; Bendigo Indoor Aquatic and Wellbeing Centre
development; Bendigo Stadium major expansion, Bendigo Tennis Pavilion
construction; and the construction of Stage 1 of the Eaglehawk Play Space.
2. An unusually high operating surplus of $54.0M. The higher than normal operating
result includes capital revenue of approximately $35.2M of contributions and grants
that are used to fund the Capital and Major Works program ($100.61M) listed above.
PAGE 16
Budget 2016/17
It is worth noting that the revenue is accounted for in the operating result, however
the capital expenditure is not.
3. Repayment of debt of approximately $2.071M, resulting in a balance of a total debt
of $50.37M as at 30 June 2017.
4. An increase in income from Rates and Charges of $6.856M, made up of a rate
increase of 2.5%, supplementary rates, garbage and recycling waste collection
charges and the introduction of an organics waste collection charge.
5. An amount of $106.616M to be raised by general rates and service charges as
follows:
General Rates
Service Charges
Supplementary Rates*
$89.556M
$15.460M
$ 1.600M (estimated to be raised during the year)
6. The Budget includes a General Rate and nine (9) differential rates to be declared as
follows:
General
0.40424% of CIV
Commercial/Industrial A (Urban/non-CBD)
0.74784% of CIV
(185% of General)
0.7276% of CIV
(180% of General)
Commercial/Industrial C (CBD)
0.76799% of CIV
(190% of General)
Farm Land
0.3436% of CIV
(85% of General)
0.50528% of CIV
(125% of General)
Other Land
0.74784% of CIV
(185% of General)
0.74784% of CIV
(185% of General)
Vacant Land - Forest Edge Estate Maiden Gully properties. 0.50528% of CIV
(125% of General)
0.40424% of CIV
(100% of General)
7. In accordance with the Cultural and Recreation Lands Act 1963, the following be
declared:
Class 1
0.20212% of Capital Improved Value
Class 2
0.10104% of Capital Improved Value
Class 3
0.040424% of Capital Improved Value
Class 4
$388.00
PAGE 17
Budget 2016/17
Class 5
$509.00
8. A decrease in the residential Garbage Charge within the organics collection area of
10.87% for 120/140 litre bins and 5.04% for 240 litre bins. An increase in the
residential Garbage Charge outside the organics collection area of 2.90% for
120/140 litre bins and 2.90% for 240 litre bins, the Recycling Charge increased by
3.1%.
PAGE 18
Budget 2016/17
$ 123.00
$ 226.00
$ 142.00
$ 245.00
$ 156.20*
$ 269.50*
$ 66.50
$ 71.00
$ 269.50*
$ 539.00*
$ 808.50*
$1,347.50*
$1,886.50*
* Includes GST
** Organic Waste Collection Specified area (Pro-Rata 10 Months of $86.00 annual charge).
Please note that as the general waste charge has been reduced, the net increase to waste
charges as a result of the new organics service is $53. The same organics charge applies
to properties irrespective of garbage bin size, ie. 120L, 140L or 240L.
10. An early full rate payment discount of 1.5% on current year rates and charges will be
granted if full payment (including any arrears and interest) is received on or before
30 September 2016.
PAGE 19
Budget 2016/17
Bendigo Spirit
Cr Ruffell has a conflict of interest in the Bendigo Spirit (indirect financial interest) as she
is a member of the Board.
Timelines
The Council must adopt its Budget by 30 June, 2016 and forward a copy to the Minister
for Local Government within 28 days of adoption.
Legislative Compliance Requirements
The Budget has been prepared in accordance with the Local Government Act 1989 and
Local Government (Planning and Reporting) Regulations 2014.
Consultation/Communication
Internal Consultation:
The Budget has been prepared with extensive input from Councillors, the Executive
Management Team and Managers.
External Consultation:
Following consideration of the Proposed Budget by Council at its meeting on 4 May,
2016 the 28 day statutory period for public exhibition was undertaken, commencing on 7
May, 2016. Information regarding the Proposed Budget was made available on the City
of Greater Bendigo's website and through local print media. As outlined above, 21
submissions were made in response to the Proposed Budget.
Resource Implications
The formal budget documentation details the resources required and applied to deliver
services, programs and capital works during 2016/17.
Conclusion
Council has spent considerable time reviewing the Budget for 2016/17. The exhibition of
the Proposed Budget has generated a significant number of submissions which have
now been considered. Various adjustments to the Proposed Budget have been made as
a result of the submissions considered, including the inclusion of funding for additional
projects and programs.
Attachments
1.
2.
3.
PAGE 20
Budget 2016/17
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council, having considered the submissions to the
2016/17 Proposed Budget:
1. Acknowledges the allocation of $25,000 to the Bendigo Spirit.
2. Adopts the Budget, annexed to this resolution and initialled by the Mayor for
identification, being the Budget prepared for the 2016/17 financial year for the
purposes of Section 127 of the Local Government Act 1989, including the
adjustments listed below made as a result of the exhibition period.
Revenue/
(Expense)
Project/Program
Heathcote Independent Living Estate
$0
$0
$(30,000)
$254,000
$0
$(150,000)
$(15,000)
$(10,000)
$(7,500)
$(15,000)
$(3,000)
3. Gives public notice of the adoption of the 2016/17 Budget, in accordance with
Section 129 of the Local Government Act 1989, and make available for public
inspection the information required by the Local Government Act 1989 and the Local
Government (Finance and Reporting) Regulations 2004, to display the Budget at the
City of Greater Bendigo offices and on the City of Greater Bendigo website.
4. Acknowledges the contribution of submitters to the budget process, and thanks them
for their contribution.
5. Implements a differential rate as follows:
General
0.40424% of CIV
Commercial/Industrial A (Urban/non-CBD)
0.74784% of CIV
(185% of General)
0.7276% of CIV
(180% of General)
Commercial/Industrial C (CBD)
0.76799% of CIV
(190% of General)
PAGE 21
Budget 2016/17
Farm Land
0.3436% of CIV
(85% of General)
0.50528% of CIV
(125% of General)
Other Land
0.74784% of CIV
(185% of General)
0.74784% of CIV
(185% of General)
Vacant Land - Forest Edge Estate Maiden Gully properties. 0.50528% of CIV
(125% of General)
0.40424% of CIV
(100% of General)
5. Declares the following, in accordance with the Cultural and Recreation Lands Act
1963:
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
Class 5
$ 123.00
$ 226.00
$ 142.00
$ 245.00
$ 156.20*
$ 269.50*
$ 66.50
$ 71.00
$ 269.50*
$ 539.00*
$ 808.50*
$1,347.50*
$1,886.50*
* Includes GST
** Organic Waste Collection Specified area (Pro-Rata 10 Months of $86.00 annual charge).
Please note that as the general waste charge has been reduced, the net increase to waste
charges as a result of the new organics service is $53. The same organics charge applies
to properties irrespective of garbage bin size, ie. 120L, 140L or 240L.
7. Grants an early full rate payment discount of 1.5% on current year rates and
charges, if full payment (including any arrears and interest) is received on or before
30 September 2016.
PAGE 22
Budget 2016/17
8. Refers the track works at the LaTrobe University Bendigo Athletics Complex and the
upgrade of township entry signs outside of the central Bendigo area to the mid-year
budget review for funding consideration.
PAGE 23
3.
3.1
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
[Petitions and joint letters with ten (10) or more signatures are included in the agenda or
tabled at the meeting, unless there is a separate legal process for considering the
petition or joint letter, as there is for planning submissions or submissions following
public notices (Section 223 LGA)].
A petition has been received from concerned residents in the area of Michael Street,
Kennington, as outlined below:
Signatures
15
PAGE 24
Works to establish essential path connections around the municipality within the Capital
Works Program occur on a prioritised basis whereby those streets with the greatest
demand and overall community benefit are addressed first. Current footpaths in the
vicinity of this request are detailed in green in Figure 1 over the page.
Figure 1 - Michael Street, Kennington, between McIvor Road and Hodgkinson Street:
Earlier this year, the City received a customer request to investigate the possibility of a
footpath being constructed along the east side of Michael Street, Kennington. The project
was investigated and a response was provided to the resident which outlined the Capital
Works Program rating process and the conclusion that the proposed works were not
identified amongst the highest footpath priorities based on evaluation criteria.
The petition/joint letter received identifies the same section of proposed footpath along
Michael Street, Kennington. As detailed in the initial response provided to the resident,
this project has been rated in the City's Capital Works Program. Based on the evaluation
criteria and relative to other projects listed in the Program, a footpath on the east side of
Michael Street, Kennington has been assessed in regard to some of the criteria as
follows:
Footpath already exists to the north and south of this section of Michael Street;
Acknowledged as 'medium risk' in that an uneven nature strip can encourage people
to walk on the road-side;
PAGE 25
It is also recognised that the absence of a footpath along this section of Michael Street is
an anomaly when looking at the wider area and the fact that nearly all other streets have
a footpath on both sides of the road. However, the exclusion of short sections of footpath
in areas with surrounding path infrastructure is an issue that is replicated in several
established residential areas. The City works to infill these sections based on the rating
criteria as specified above, to ensure that those streets with the greatest demand and
overall community benefit are addressed first.
Subsequently, the analysis of this project provides a rating for the proposed footpath
construction in the City's Capital Works Program. Through the rating and prioritisation
process, the $47,000 project has ranked 348 out of 633 path projects. It is therefore not
identified as a high priority project and is unlikely to be under consideration for referral to
the Council Budget in the next five years. It will however, continue to be re-assessed on
an annual basis for funding consideration through future Council budget processes.
RECOMMENDATION
That Greater Bendigo Council, having considered the petition/joint letter:
1. Recognise that the section of proposed footpath on Michael Street, Kennington
between McIvor Highway and Hodgkinson Street is not amongst the highest path
priorities and is not in consideration for the 2016/17 Council Budget or the
development of the draft 2017/18 Council Budget.
2. Support the annual Capital Works Program re-assessment process, including the
identified evaluation criteria and the development of prioritised Programs.
3. Inform the submitter of the petition of Council's resolution.
PAGE 26
4.
4.1
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Amendment details:
Proponent:
No. of submissions:
Key issues:
PAGE 27
Recommendation:
Significance Overlay
Support for more industrial land by local industries
Hydrogeological conditions of the site and impacts of
dewatering
Traffic impacts
Developer contributions
Loss of agricultural land
Sewer and water supply
Character of Marong
Changes to Amendment recommended by Panel and
Officer, including translation of some planning
requirements to a new schedule to the Development Plan
Overlay
Whether the Amendment should be split into two parts
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015-2016 update)
Planning for Growth
2.1
Greater Bendigo delivers major projects while maintaining its unique character,
accommodating a growing population and diversifying the economy.
2.1.5Progress the Marong Business Park Planning Scheme Amendment
Accelerate the development of the Marong Business Park as a key new location
for industry and business.
13.2
Prioritise the implementation of the Marong Plan and Marong Business Park
development.
PAGE 28
Background Information
This amendment stems from an analysis of industrial land supply and demand
commissioned by the City of Greater Bendigo. A two stage Bendigo Future Industrial
Land Strategy (BFILS) project was initiated in June 2005. The Stage 1 report was
prepared by Connell Wagner and SGS Planning and Economics Pty Ltd.
Council considered Stage 1 of the project in April 2006. Stage 1 involved a review of the
supply and demand for industrial land in the municipality. The report included analysis of
future industrial trends, including likely demand and supply issues for the Bendigo region
and noted the gradual decline in traditional labour-intensive and heavy industry and the
growth of higher order, cleaner, high tech and higher skilled industrial uses. The report
determined that to meet demand for industrial land in Greater Bendigo to 2031, an extra
270 hectares of industrial land was required. However, the report noted that a minimum
of 2-3 times this amount of land would be required to provide the necessary
infrastructure, support services, waste treatment and site buffers.
Council chose Marong West as the preferred location for future industrial growth and the
site of Greater Bendigos future business park, based on the strategic analysis
undertaken in the Bendigo Future Industrial Land Strategy. The Marong West site
encompassed land bound by Yorkshire Road, Calder Highway, Houliston Road and
Cleary Road boundaries.
In December 2007, Council considered Stage 2 of the project, the Marong Business Park
Analysis Project (2007), prepared by Connell Wagner which involved a detailed study of
970 hectares of land west of Marong. Considerations included servicing, traffic and
transport, surface and groundwater, geotechnical and land productivity, land use, buffers,
sustainability, environmental and heritage.
The report recommended the use of the Special Use Zone with a Development Plan
Overlay, with the need for other overlays identified, to address environmental issues,
urban design and development contributions. The report concluded that the site could be
developed as an industrial business park and identified further work to be undertaken to
progress the proposal.
Councils vision for the business park was a sustainable, attractive and functional
business and industrial community that offers employees and employers the opportunity
to work in a high quality environment which supports the Greater Bendigo community
and region. The aim was to provide a site that meets industrys needs, is strategically
located and free of significant environmental constraints. The site needed to be well
buffered from sensitive uses, and large enough to also accommodate support services.
Since the Marong Business Park Analysis Project (2007) was adopted, Council decided
to reduce the area for the proposed Business Park from 967 hectares to 313 hectares,
with the reduction in the size of the land being a strategic decision in that it reduced the
impact and uncertainties for neighbouring landowners, whilst still providing a land supply
for 20 to 30 years. However, the change to the size of the land has necessitated the
need for a land use buffer for the proposed business park, affecting some adjoining land.
PAGE 29
Also, further consideration was given to the most appropriate planning controls for the
proposal. Consequently, the Comprehensive Development Zone is proposed for the
Marong Business Park, as it allows greater flexibility than any other zone in the Victoria
Planning Provisions as it can be tailored for particular uses.
The Loddon Mallee South Regional Growth Plan (2014) is the States strategic land use
plan for the region to guide growth and change for the next 30 years. The Plan states
that Bendigo will accommodate the majority of growth in the Loddon Mallee South region
over the next 30 years. It states the city is expected to continue to experience strong
and steady population growth to 2041, with a projected population of 150,000. This Plan
sets an aspirational population target for Bendigo close to 200,000 people to help drive
investment and economic growth in the region.
Actions of the Loddon Mallee Regional Growth Plan include accelerating the
development of the Marong Business Park as a key new location for industry and
business and prioritising the implementation of the Marong Plan and Marong Business
Park development.
The key steps in the Amendment process are summarised below:
Amendment prepared
Submissions received
We are at this
point
PAGE 30
The subject site is known as 104 Carters Lane & 20 Yorkshire Road, Wilsons Hill. The
land proposed to be rezoned for the Marong Business Park is located approximately 500
metres west of the Marong township, as shown above in Figure 1. It is located
approximately 16 kilometres west of the Bendigo CBD and is outside the Urban Growth
Boundary.
PAGE 31
The land is generally bounded by Calder Highway to the north, an unmade vegetated
road reserve to the west, Sandhurst-Inglewood railway line and Yorkshire Road to the
south. The proposed business park site comprises an area of approximately 313
hectares.
The site is generally flat and has been used for grazing and cropping for over 100 years.
It is mostly cleared with the exception of a patch of native vegetation located centrally
within the site and some scattered trees. The land contains a dwelling (formerly the
Yorkshire Hotel) and outbuildings in the south eastern corner of the site and a number of
dams. Access to the dwelling is currently via Yorkshire Road, with another access via a
gravel crossover to Calder Highway near the centrally located patch of native vegetation.
The subject site has a frontage of approximately 4.66 kilometres to the Calder Highway.
The land is currently zoned Farming Zone and is not affected by any overlays. The
Calder Highway abuts the site to the north east and is zoned Road Zone 1. The railway
line to the south is zoned Public Use Zone 4. The land in the surrounding area is zoned
Farming Zone and used for farming with associated dwellings and outbuildings, with
Bullock Creek and Dry Creek affected by an Environmental Significance Overlay 1.
What the Amendment does
The exhibited Amendment proposes to:
Rezone the land for the Marong Business Park from Farming Zone to Comprehensive
Development Zone Schedule 3 (CDZ3).
Apply the Public Acquisition Overlay 6 (PAO6) to the proposed site and proposed
drainage corridor to Dry Creek.
Apply Development Contributions Plan Overlay 1 (DCPO1) to the proposed site.
Apply the Environmental Significance Overlay 6 (ESO6) to properties surrounding the
northern end of the proposed Marong Business Park.
Apply the Heritage Overlay (HO862) to the former Yorkshire Hotel environs.
Amend Clauses 21.01 (Municipal Profile), 21.02 (Key Issues and Influences), 21.04
(Strategic Directions), 21.07 (Economic Development), 21.09 (Infrastructure), 21.10
(Reference Documents), 22.05 (Industrial Policy) to provide strategic justification for
the Amendment in the Planning Scheme.
Consultation/Communication
Exhibition Procedures
The Amendment was exhibited for six weeks from 19 February 2015 to 2 April 2015.
Notice was provided in the following manner:
Individual notices to owners and occupiers of land affected by the Amendment.
Notices to prescribed Ministers under Section 19(1)(c) of the Planning and
Environment Act.
Notices to all authorities materially affected under Section 19(1)(a) of the Act.
Public notice of the Amendment in the Bendigo Advertiser on 18 February 2015 and
21 February 2015.
Publication of the notice of the Amendment in the Government Gazette on 19
February 2015.
Access on-line.
PAGE 32
Submissions
A total of 27 submissions were received. Twenty-one (21) were received during the
exhibition period, with 5 late submissions received shortly after the closing date, one
further submission received after the independent Panel had been appointed.
Submissions were received from referral authorities, affected landowners, other
residents and landowners, and local businesses.
The key issues raised by the submitters included:
Compulsory acquisition of land
Hydrogeological conditions of the site and impacts of dewatering
Support for more industrial land by local industries
Industrial land supply and demand analysis
Loss of agricultural land
Sewer and water supply
Buffer area
Traffic impacts
Developer contributions
Character of Marong
Devaluation of property
Emergency services
All submitters will be notified of Councils decision resulting from this report.
The Panel Hearing
The Minister for Planning appointed an Independent Panel to consider the Amendment.
The Hearing was held on 9, 10, 11, 12, 16 and 17 November and 14 January. The Panel
has considered all written and oral submissions and material presented to it in
connection with the Amendment.
The Panel Report and Recommendations
The Panel Report was received on 15 February 2016 and contained 5 recommendations.
Under Section 26 of the Planning & Environment Act 1987, the panel report was
automatically released on 14 March 2016 to the public, 28 days following its receipt.
In summary, the Panel recommended the Amendment be adopted with changes.
PAGE 33
Key Issues
The above sites were reassessed in 2009, together with an additional site, known as
Marong South, before Council confirmed the Marong West site as the most suitable site
for the proposed business park and resolved to proceed with this Amendment.
In its report, the Panel noted that the original score given for access to rail was no
longer accurate given the dilapidated state of the decommissioned rail line, and that the
Elmore site had the same score for ability to meet land area needs, and ranked
reasonably well against the secondary siting criteria. However, it is noted that even after
all sites were reassessed against the criteria in 2009, with the access to rail criteria
excluded, the Marong West site still ranked as the best site.
Loss of agricultural land
Evidence was presented at the Panel hearing about the agricultural quality of the land, its
impact on regional productivity and the impact on viability of the landowners farm,
should land be compulsorily acquired.
The Panel accepted that the proposal will result in a loss of good quality (not high value)
agricultural land, but that this loss would be offset by broader positive economic impacts.
It concluded that any adverse impacts of the Amendment on agricultural land would be
manageable.
Buffer
The Amendment proposes to apply the Environmental Significance Overlay Schedule 6
(ESO6) to land adjoining the business park for the purpose of a buffer. The objectives of
ESO6 are to ensure that any development in the overlay area does not prejudice the
development of, and ongoing operation of, the Marong Business Park, and to minimise
the potential for future sensitive uses to be affected by off-site amenity impacts and
reduce land use conflict.
As the ultimate uses within the business park are not known, the City proposed a buffer
distance of a total of 500 metres which would accommodate the recommended
separation distances for the majority of industries as required by Clause 52.10 of the
Planning Scheme (Uses with adverse amenity potential) and the EPAs guidelines
(Recommended Separation Distances for Industrial Residual Air Emissions, EPA March
2013). Fifty metres is proposed to be accommodated within the business park site, with
the overlay to extend over adjoining land for a distance of 450 metres from the edge of
the business park, including the road and rail reserves.
The ESO is an appropriate planning control to address environmental risks. The
precedent for the use of ESOs to provide buffers external to potential sources of odour or
noise emissions from incompatible development has been well established and is
commonplace around Victoria, and has generally been accepted by other planning
panels.
PAGE 35
There may be a contrary view that the ESO shouldnt be used to control the use of land,
however ESOs have been approved by the Minister to control buffers around a range of
uses in the Loddon Mallee region, including a waste water treatment plant and reuse
centre (ESO2 Mildura), Merbein Mushroom Plant (ES03 Mildura), an abattoir, an asphalt
and crushing plant, a concrete batching plant (ES04 Mildura), a livestock exchange,
waste transfer plant and pound (ESO2 Campaspe), and an abattoir (ESO2 Central
Goldfields), as well as elsewhere in the State, including power stations (ESO3 Moyne),
broiler farms (ESO2 Murrindindi), noise from Winton Motor Raceway (ESO1 Benalla),
sewerage treatment plant (ESO5 Moorabool and ESO4 Benalla), extractive industry
(ESO1 La Trobe) and port industries (ESO5 Greater Geelong).
The Department of Environment, Land, Water and Plannings publication Using Victorias
Planning System states that the ESO has a role in both conservation and protection, as
well as containing and controlling development where risk is posed to property, health,
amenity and safety.
Submissions raised concerns about the application of this overlay on the basis that any
required buffers should be contained within the business park and not affect other land,
and that the overlay would restrict a landowners ability to use and develop their land.
While the Panel accepted that the ESO can be used to manage interface issues between
incompatible land uses, it recommended that the ESO6 not be applied as part of the
Amendment because:
There is insufficient justification.
An ESO should be considered as part of any future amendment to rezone the
adjoining land for residential purposes, and any future ESO schedule should be
tailored to reflect Marong Business Parks specific circumstances.
Council should consider introducing a bufferrelated policy for the Marong Business
Park in Clause 22.05.
The setback provisions in the Comprehensive Development Zone 3 are satisfactory
and will guide the preparation of a precinct development plan and planning permit
application.
The basis for the Panels recommendation was that farming is a primary industry, and it
is likely that existing residents living in the Farming Zone area already experience early
morning and ongoing noise from farming activity, and it was unlikely that a relatively
small number of dwellings that could establish within 450 metres of the business park
would adversely impact on its operation. It further stated that the business parks 50
metre building setback and the Calder Highway road reserve would provide appropriate
setbacks for many industrial uses seeking to locate closer to the highway.
It is recommended that Council does not accept the Panels recommendation to delete
this overlay from the Amendment. The overlay is an important planning control that will
help achieve Councils vision for the business park, being to provide a well buffered and
sustainable supply of industrial land for the next 30 years. There are many interface
problems already in existence in Bendigo and the proposal seeks to avoid creating future
land use conflicts.
PAGE 36
The use of buffers on adjoining land is an accepted outcome, provided the impact of
such buffers on the particular land is not unreasonable. The imposition of the ESO6 will
have no effect on farming activities as its main purpose is to require a permit for
dwellings, and it will greatly assist in avoiding future encroachment issues which can be
reasonably anticipated.
The overlay is the most appropriate planning tool available in the Victoria Planning
Provisions in order to trigger the need for a permit for specific types of development and
allow Council to consider the likely amenity impacts when a development associated with
a sensitive use is proposed. The overlay is necessary as the threshold distances for
industrial uses specified in Clause 52.10 (Uses with adverse amenity potential) of the
planning scheme, do not apply to sensitive uses within the Farming Zone, but Clauses
13.04-2 (Air quality), 17.02-1 (Industrial land development) and 17.02-2 (Design of
industrial development) all require consideration of the EPAs Recommended Separation
Distances for Industrial Air Emissions.
The Panels view was that the Farming Zone provides little opportunity to intensify
sensitive land uses to the point that would affect the operation of the business park, and
that State planning policy refers to applying appropriate buffers to settlement, not farming
land. However, the EPAs Recommended Separation Distances for Industrial Air
Emissions require the consideration of separation distances from any sensitive use,
including a single dwelling, not just an urban settlement. The ESO6 specifically require
consideration of the EPA guidelines, which are largely consistent with the threshold
distances in Clause 52.10.
There is potential for parcels within the Farming Zone to be consolidated into lots over 40
hectares and developed with dwellings without the need for a planning permit. This could
result in a number of additional dwellings establishing within close proximity to the
business park. Dwellings within close proximity to the business park could reduce the
attractiveness of the site for businesses, and stifle future expansion opportunities for
businesses which establish within the site.
There is no statutory requirement for consideration of amenity impacts on dwellings
within the Farming Zone for anything other than agricultural activities under current
planning controls. Increasing the minimum lot size for an as of right dwelling for land
surrounding the business park by changing the Schedule to the Farming Zone would
increase the likelihood of permits being required for any new dwelling, however it will not
enable Council to consider the likely environmental risks and amenity impacts of the
business park on such a use. This is why the ESO6 is required.
The City considers it essential to adopt the precautionary approach by applying the
ESO6 to protect the integrity of the business park in the long term. One of the key drivers
of this proposal was to provide suitable land unconstrained by possible land use
conflicts.
The Panel was critical of the Citys proposal to apply the overlay given the ultimate uses
within the business park are not yet known. However, it is argued that the cumulative
impacts of industry within a 313 hectare business park should not be underestimated.
The impacts are likely to be vastly different from the typical impacts resulting from
agricultural activities, particularly in terms of noise and odour.
PAGE 37
The ESO6 will have minimal impact on agricultural use on neighbouring farms. The
development of outbuildings, sheds and stables will be exempt from permit requirements.
Following the release of the Panel report, the City has consulted further with the EPA,
who has confirmed its support for the application of the Environmental Significance
Overlay. The EPA advised that separation distances are critical and a precautionary
approach should be taken, with buffers put in place as early in the planning process as
possible. It is important to note that the EPA would not support the proposed zone in its
current form without an acceptable planning tool for a buffer in place. It advised that if
there is no planning control in place to ensure separation distances are maintained,
including provisions to assess new developments, then there is a significant risk that
amenity impacts will be experienced.
A report by an independent Ministerial Advisory Committee into Victorias Environment
Protection Authority, released in March this year, examined EPAs strategic approach to
land use planning. The report recommended the development of strengthened land use
planning mechanisms to better manage and address conflicting land uses.
Recommendation 10.3 of the report is: to develop, as a priority, strengthened land use
planning mechanisms that establish and maintain buffers to separate conflicting land
uses, avoid encroachment problems, help manage health, safety and amenity impacts,
and ensure integration with EPA regulatory requirements.
The report acknowledges that there are gaps between the planning and environmental
systems. The separation distances in the planning system deal with risks posed by new
industrial development that will have amenity impacts, but they dont capture applications
for sensitive uses in areas with pre-existing buffers.
Section 10.3.3 of the report relates to providing effective buffers to manage future
amenity impacts. It states that the most effective approach to managing encroachment
issues is to provide for the formal separation of conflicting activities through planning
scheme requirements, such as threshold distances that provide buffers. This issue is an
important area for integrating land use planning and environmental protection. In effect
licensing conditions establish the acceptable levels of emissions assuming a given
industrial process and a given separation distance to avoid amenity impacts on sensitive
uses. These separation distances need to guide subsequent decisions made through the
planning system regarding the development and use of land that may be affected by the
licensed activity.
It further states that the planning system must clearly and consistently identify activities
with amenity impacts, so that they can be addressed in all relevant planning decisions
(for example, relating to sensitive uses). This approach also provides certainty for
businesses, prospective land developers and the community. Providing clear and
accessible information about land that is subject to a buffer and about the expectations
for potential amenity impacts is important for the planning system and environmental
regulations to operate effectively.
PAGE 38
PAGE 39
The report states: In the absence of specific guidance about the application of a PAO
and from a review of information referred to it by Council, experts and submitters, the
Panel considers that applying PAO6 for a public purpose that is not a public use should
seek to meet the following criteria:
1. Clear evidence that there is no other suitable alternative available within the defined
catchment.
2. If there are no suitable alternatives, the PAO is being applied for a public purpose by
demonstrating, among other matters:
a. Net community benefit in the interest of the defined population catchment
b. Council will acquire and develop the subject land for the duration of the project.
3. The land being acquired is supported by specific existing planning scheme policy and
provisions.
4. The intended outcomes cannot be ultimately met without the PAO.
The Panel believed that there is no exceptional circumstance to warrant the PAO, and
that there is currently no urgency to provide for industrial land. The Panel also stated that
it was not convinced that the subject land is the only suitable land for a future business
park in Greater Bendigo. It disagreed with Councils position that the upfront
development costs would make it unfeasible for the private sector to develop the
business park, and considered that on selling land after developing the first stage of the
business park did not constitute a public purpose where there are other sites which could
be rezoned. The Panel considered that Councils aspirations for a future business park
can be met without a PAO.
Given the significance of this project, and its long term planning horizon, it is considered
that further discussion and thought about applying the PAO over the business park site is
warranted. It is therefore recommended that a decision on this part of the Amendment be
deferred. This would require the Amendment to be split into two parts.
Splitting the Amendment would allow Council more time to see how market forces might
impact on development of the site, to determine whether the PAO is required. Deferring a
decision would also allow more time for Council to provide further justification if it decides
the PAO is required. This part of the Amendment would not need to be re-exhibited if
council decided to adopt the PAO in the future. Landowners would be advised of any
future consideration of a decision on the PAO.
The alternative option would for Council to make a decision not proceed with the PAO for
the business park now. This would not prevent Council from revisiting this issue in the
future via a new planning scheme amendment process if Council determined that
compulsory acquisition of the land was necessary to facilitate the establishment of the
business park.
Environmental impacts
A number of submissions raised concerns regarding drainage, flooding, sand aquifers
and groundwater. Evidence was presented about each of these issues at the Panel
Hearing.
PAGE 40
PAGE 41
Development contributions
The proposed Development Contributions Plan (DCP) sets out developer levies to fund
infrastructure projects for the development including roadworks, intersections, drainage,
cycle and pedestrian trails and public open space.
As noted previously, VicRoads had challenged the proposed contribution for the
signalisation of the intersection of High Street and Calder Alternative Highway. Another
submission argued that developer contributions will be a financial burden and make the
land unattractive to industries.
The Panel concluded that the DCP is a fair and equitable mechanism for collecting levies
and funding projects associated with the Marong Business Park. It stated that
apportioning 37.6 per cent of the total project cost of signalising the intersection of High
Street and Calder Alternative Highway to the Marong Business Park is justified. The
Panel stated that the DCP can be changed to reflect roundabouts instead of signalised
intersections without transforming the Amendment, subject to aligning with the DCPs
existing methodology.
Other Issues
The panel considered issues relating to services and utilities, the character of Marong,
emergency services and property values which were raised in the submissions received.
The Panel did not express any concerns or make recommendations in relation to these
matters.
PAGE 42
PAGE 43
Officer Response
Accept the Panels recommendation.
(d) Translate content requirements for a precinct development plan into application
requirements.
Officer Response
Disagree with the Panels recommendation. It is accepted that the CDZ3 schedule
does not meet the Ministerial Direction for Form and Content of Amendments in its
exhibited form. However, it is considered that the Development Plan Overlay is the
most appropriate Victoria Planning Provision tool to enable the preparation of a
development plan for each precinct, prior to use and development of the land. It is
recommended that the precinct development plan requirements be translated to a
new Schedule to the Development Plan Overlay, to enable a faithful translation of
intent of the exhibited amendment. This would not result in a transformation of the
Amendment.
Panel Recommendation 2:
Delete the Public Acquisition Overlay for all land except the drainage easement
along the Calder Highway.
Officer Response
Agree to apply the PAO over the proposed drainage corridor. Split the Amendment
into two parts to defer a decision on whether to adopt the PAO for the business park.
This will provide Council more time to consider whether the PAO is warranted and
opportunity to determine whether there is sufficient market interest in for private
developers to take up the site.
Panel Recommendation 3:
Delete Environmental Significance Overlay Schedule 6.
Officer Response
Disagree with the Panels recommendation. It is not accepted that the ESO6 is
unnecessary for the proposed business park for the reasons outlined in this report.
The Environmental Significance Overlay is the most appropriate planning tool to
implement a buffer and the ESO6 should be applied.
Panel Recommendation 4:
Change the Development Contributions Plan to replace signalised intersections with
roundabouts that meet VicRoads specifications and make consequential changes
throughout before the Amendment is finalised.
Officer Response
Accept the Panels recommendation.
PAGE 44
Panel Recommendation 5:
Amend Clause 21.04 to replace clause with Clause.
Officer Response
Accept the Panels recommendation.
Conclusion
Over the past decade, the City of Greater Bendigo has undertaken significant work to
identify a future site to provide for the municipalitys industrial land requirements through
to 2041.
In 2012 the City commissioned an Economic Impact Assessment Report. The report
found 202 hectares of industrial land was required, at a minimum, to provide for a
forecast 3,270 jobs. If the land was consolidated into a business park location, then a
further 360 jobs, or a total of 3,630 jobs, would be created.
Currently Greater Bendigo does not have enough suitable industrial land to meet the
demand to 2041. There is about 100 hectares of industrial zoned land available, most of
which is constrained and fragmented, and there is a shortage of large buffered sites.
More land will be needed to accommodate new and expanding existing businesses.
Multiple locations outside urban Bendigo were considered to provide the additional land,
with Marong identified as the most suitable place to generate economic and social
benefits for the Greater Bendigo and the wider region.
This Amendment will have significant strategic planning implications both for the
municipality and the region. Greater Bendigo plays an important role within the Loddon
Mallee South region, with the municipalitys population forecast to be 145,000 by 2030,
with an aspirational target of 200,000 by 2041.
The Marong Business Park is supported by State planning policy, with Marong identified
within the Loddon Mallee Regional Growth Plan as a future employment hub and the
Marong Business Park being a key new location for industry and business. The
development of the Marong Business Park is also likely to have implications on strategic
planning for Marong township and the western part of municipality with regard to
infrastructure provision.
Providing a buffer for the business park will be critical for its sustainability into the future
and minimising the potential for land use conflicts.
Having considered the Panels recommendations, it is recommended that the
Amendment be supported, with changes. It is also recommended that Council split the
Amendment into two parts.
Part 1 would comprise:
Rezoning the land to Comprehensive Development Zone Schedule 3;
Applying the Development Contributions Plan Overlay Schedule 1 to the land;
PAGE 45
PAGE 46
Potential for reductions in processing time for new applications which are generally in
accordance with approved development plans and incorporated Marong Business
Park Comprehensive Development Plan (2014).
Including a number of preferred land uses as Section 1 uses (i.e. no permit required).
Exemption from notice and review for applications generally in accordance with the
Marong Business Park Comprehensive Development Plan (2014) and the approved
development plan.
Council will also require additional resources to implement and monitor the development
contributions plan, and to review the plan every 5 years.
Attachments
Explanatory report
Panel report
EPA information
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council resolves to:
1. Split the Amendment into two parts, with Part 1 of the Amendment being to rezone
the subject land to Comprehensive Development Zone Schedule 3 and apply the
Development Contributions Overlay Schedule 1, Development Plan Overlay
Schedule 29, and Heritage Overlay HO862 and apply the Environmental Significance
Overlay Schedule 6 to some land surrounding the business park, and the Public
Acquisition Overlay - Schedule 6 to the proposed drainage corridor land.
Part 2 is to comprise the Public Acquisition Overlay Schedule 6 proposed for the
business park land.
2. Adopt Part 1 of the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C161 with
changes.
3. Forward the adopted Amendment (Part 1) to the Minister for Planning for Approval.
4. Write to the Minister for Planning to request an extension of time of two years to
make a decision on Part 2 of the Amendment.
PAGE 47
4.2
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Amendment details:
No. of submissions:
Key issues:
Recommendation:
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
Theme 5: Sustainability
1. The built and natural qualities that make Greater Bendigo an attractive and appealing
place are valued and conserved
PAGE 48
5.1 Protect and conserve Greater Bendigos natural environment and settings for the
future
Strategy Reference
The Rural Areas Strategy (2009)
8. Future Strategic Work: Significant Landscape Overlay A study for the Big Hill
escarpment, parts of the Mandurang Valley and areas of the Campaspe/Axe Creek.
Loddon Mallee South Regional Growth Plan Reference:
12. Environment
Future direction- Protect identified visually important landscapes and cultural and built
heritage places.
Background Information
Previous Council Decision(s) Date(s):
6 July 2011 - Council endorsed a project brief describing the purpose and scope of a
landscape assessment covering the areas of Big Hill and the Mandurang Valley.
21 August 2013 - Council adopted the Big Hill and Mandurang Valley Landscape Report,
and resolved to request the Minister for Planning to authorise Council to prepare a
Planning Scheme Amendment.
11 February 2015 - Council resolved to request the authorisation to prepare and exhibit a
Planning Scheme Amendment to implement the recommendations of the Landscape
Assessment Report for Big Hill and Mandurang Valley into the Greater Bendigo Planning
Scheme.
14 October 2015 Council considered submissions to Amendment C217 and resolved to
refer all submissions to an Independent Panel appointed by the Minister for Planning.
Report
The following table sets out the Planning Scheme Amendment process. Amendment
C217 is now at a stage where the Panel Hearing has been completed and Council needs
to decide whether to accept the Panel recommendations, adopt or abandon the
amendment.
What the amendment does
Planning Scheme Amendment C217 implements the findings of the Bendigo Landscape
Assessment, Big Hill and Mandurang Valley Final Report, 2013 (the Study) prepared by
Planisphere.
The planning scheme amendment introduces updates to the Municipal Strategic
Statement at Clauses 21.08 and 21.10 to reflect the strategic recommendations of the
PAGE 49
report and also introduces two new schedules to the Significant Landscape Overlay- Big
Hill (SLO3) and the Mandurang Valley (SLO4).
The introduction of two new Significant Landscape Overlay Schedules will give statutory
effect to the recommendations of the report and assist Council in its decision making in
relation to the ongoing protection and management of these landscapes.
PAGE 50
The Panel submitted its report to Council on 4 April 2016 and it was subsequently
released within the statutory 28 day period.
Amendment C217 Panel Report
The Panel raised a number of concerns with the Study and the Amendment, namely:
The Panel ultimately recommended that Amendment C217 be deferred pending further
work that would address the concerns raised by the Panel.
Response to the Amendment C217 Panel Report
The recommendation of the Panel was unexpected.
Planisphere who prepared the Landscape Assessment are a highly regarded company
and one of the few consultancies across the State to undertake this type of work
including work for the State Government. The methodology they used has been
accepted by a number of other Panels.
Following receipt and review of the Panel Report, Planisphere undertook a detailed
review of the Panel Recommendations. It is important to note that this review was
prepared by 2 Directors of Plansiphere who had not been involved in the preparation of
the Landscape Assessment. A copy of this review is attached and the key outcomes of
this review are:
Panel Recommendation / Comment
Planisphere Response
PAGE 51
Planisphere Response
PAGE 52
The Panel have essentially formed the view that if a landscape cannot be viewed from a
public vantage point then it shouldnt have the SLO applied to it. The argument put to
the Panel in the Council submission was that a range of factors contribute to landscape
significance cultural, environmental, social or geological factors. Just because land
might not be visible this does not mean these other values are not significant or dont
deserve planning scheme protection. Using this logic a heritage building that cant been
seen doesnt deserve protection under the Heritage Overlay.
In addition, over time more areas may become visible from new public vantage points.
For example when the new Ravenswood Interchange is complete it will offer entirely new
views of the area.
In relation to visibility of the site it was noted during the hearing that the Ravenswood
Run site is highly visible from the train line and that thousands of people go past the site
every day. This was not acknowledged or even referred to in the Panel report.
It is also apparent that there are differing views from Planning Panels in regard to
Landscape Assessment. The Nillumbik C81 Panel supported the application of the SLO
over locally significant landscapes and there are a number of amendments are varying
stages proposing a SLO over locally significant landscapes.
Another interesting recommendation of the Panel was to not support the Mandurang
Valley South Character Area but there is little within the report to justify this other than
the opinion of the Panel
Also in relation to Mandurang Valley the Panel gave weight to there not being strong
community support for the application given that 20 of the 33 submissions received in
this area did not support the amendment. What the Panel did not acknowledge was that
over 660 parties were notified of the amendment in Mandurang and Mandurang South.
Only 3% of people objected and this is not considered to be a basis to say there is a lack
of community support.
Priority/Importance:
The amendment is of high importance as it is critical in the management of significant
landscapes.
Options/Alternatives:
Council has three options:
Accept the Panel recommendation and undertake further work (this would be subject
to a budget bid).
Not to accept the Panel recommendations, to adopt the amendment and send the
documentation to the Minister for Planning for approval.
Abandon the amendment.
Timelines:
Should Council accept the recommendation in this report, the amendment
documentation should be finalised and submitted to the Minister for Planning for
approval.
PAGE 53
Risk Analysis:
The planning scheme amendment process requires consideration of social, economic
and environmental risks that will be assessed as part of the Planning Panel process.
Consultation/Communication
The development of the Landscape Assessment went through an exhaustive community
consultation process that included community workshops, information sessions and
meetings with landowners and other stakeholders.
Notice of Amendment C217 was sent to over 670 landowners and advertised in the local
papers. The exhibition period was also extended to 6 weeks to allow affected parties
additional time to prepare submissions.
Conclusion
The Big Hill and Mandurang Valley Landscape Assessment has been through an
exhaustive process in its development and there is a strong level of community support.
Given the nature of the Big Hill and Mandurang Valley landscapes the report is large and
complex but this is necessary and reflects the significant amount information and
resources that have gone into the development of the Study.
It is considered that the criticisms of the Study and the Amendment by the Panel are
unreasonable given other Panels have accepted the Planisphere methodology and have
accepted that locally significant landscapes deserve protection under the SLO. The
Panel did make some general observations that would improve the readability of the
Study and these should be pursued.
Given the issues discussed above it is considered on balance that the Panel
recommendations should not be supported.
Attachments
RECOMMENDATION
That Greater Bendigo City Council resolve to:
1. Not accept the recommendations made by the Amendment C217 Planning Panel.
2. Make alterations to the Big Hill and Mandurang Valley Landscape Assessment to
respond to issues raised by the Panel as outlined above.
3. Adopt Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C217.
PAGE 54
4. Forward the adopted Amendment and draft planning permit to the Minister for
Planning for Approval, together with the prescribed information pursuant to Section
31(1) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
PAGE 55
4.3
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Amendment details:
Proponent:
Key issues:
Recommendation:
PAGE 56
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015-2016 Update)
Planning for Growth
Housing options provide broader choice in order to meet current and future
community expectations and needs.
Productivity
Council fosters business and industry growth.
Sustainability
The built and natural qualities that make Greater Bendigo an attractive and appealing
place are valued and conserved.
Background Information
The key steps in the Amendment process are summarised below:
Amendment prepared
We are at this
point
Submissions received
The amendment has arisen from a privately sponsored request. The amendment request
follows adoption of the City of Greater Bendigos Residential Strategy which seeks to
promote urban consolidation in appropriate locations.
PAGE 57
A request for approval of a Development Plan has also been received for the site. This
process will occur concurrently with the amendment process but does not form part of
this request for authorisation. Notification of the Development Plan will be required as per
Council policy.
Previous Council Decisions
Amendment C034 allowed for the rezoning of the subject site to Residential 1 (now
known as General Residential) and inclusion of a Development Plan Overlay.
The Council adopted the proposal on 27 October 2003 following a panel hearing.
Report
The Planning and Environment Act 1987 allows for a planning scheme amendment to be
initiated by a municipal Council, or a Council can respond to a request for an
Amendment by any person or body.
When requesting authorisation from the Minister for Planning, an Explanatory Report
must be submitted that discusses the purpose, effects and strategic justification for the
Amendment. Key issues identified in the Explanatory Report are summarised below.
Land affected by the Amendment
The amendment applies to 39-51 Lansell Street, East Bendigo (Lot 2 PS 434810S)
The site is an irregular shaped allotment located on the northern side of Lansell Street
and extending through to Lloyd Street.
The site was formally utilised and developed for Bendigo Abattoir and Country Roads
Board. All buildings which were constructed on the site have been demolished and
decontamination works have occurred.
PAGE 58
The site contains a frontage to Lansell Street of 99.76 metres, has a frontage to Lloyd
Street of 161.21 metres and a total area of 2.615 hectares.
The topography of the site is undulating and is significantly cleared, with the exception of
four trees.
Land adjoining to the east / south east is zoned Public Use Service and Utility and is
denoted by VicRoads Regional Office.
Land immediately to the west is zoned Public Use Education and Transport and is
denoted by Bendigo / Kangan TAFE.
Further to the west of the site is land zoned Special Use and Public Park and Recreation.
This land contains East Bendigo bowls club, swimming pool and hall.
Land to the north and south of the site is residentially zoned and contains a mixture of
residential development.
Delete the cap on dwelling numbers (currently 65) and put in place appropriate
design principles.
Acknowledge work undertaken to record the heritage of the site and include
requirements in relation to implementation of interpretation plan.
Update out of date requirement (i.e. star rating for energy efficiency).
PAGE 59
Expand on design requirements regarding built form and urban design to achieve
high quality outcome for the site.
The amendment has been requested to provide greater opportunity for residential
development on the site.
Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
Social Impacts
The amendment will help facilitate high quality housing for a diverse demographic of the
community. The site is in close proximity and readily accessible to a range of commercial
and community facilitates including retail, educational uses and public transport.
The proposal will result in an increased traffic generation in the area, however a Traffic
Report to accompany the amendment states "traffic generated by the proposed
development can be accommodated on the surrounding road network and intersections
without an adverse impact and no mitigating works are required as a result."
The amendment will result in positive social impacts for the municipality.
Economic Impacts
The amendment will have a positive impact on the economy of the area by promoting
additional residential development in a serviced urban context. The advance of
residential development in the area will provide additional growth opportunity and
benefits for retail and other services
An economic impact assessment has been prepared to accompany this amendment
which further details the economic benefits of the proposal including generation of jobs
and improved housing choice which will create benefits for small households and attract
new residents.
Environmental Impacts
The extent of environment impacts from the proposed amendment is considered to be
negligible.
Four native trees are established on the site which would require removal. These are the
only natural features which would be impacted upon. The removal of these trees would
require an offset to protect Victorias biodiversity value.
There are no known environmental considerations that would impact the outcomes of the
amendment. If anything, the site will be improved through remediation works which have
been undertaken to decontaminate the land.
Strategic Justification Planning Context
The amendment is supported by the following clauses in the Greater Bendigo Planning
Scheme:
State Planning Policy Framework
PAGE 60
Clause 11.12 Loddon Mallee South Regional Growth one of the objectives is to
manage population growth and settlement. A strategy of the clause is to facilitate
increased commercial and residential densities, mixed use development and
revitalisation projects for underutilised sites and land in Bendigo.
The amendment will facilitate increased residential densities on an underutilised
urban site.
Clause 15.01-4 Design for Safety the objective is to improve community safety
and encourage neighbourhood design that makes people feel safe.
The amendment will facilitate the development of the site in a higher density manner,
improving passive surveillance over the public realm and providing the opportunity for
a connection between established residential areas.
PAGE 61
Clause 18.01-1 Land Use and Transport Planning the objective is to create a
safe and sustainable transport system by integrating land-use and transport.
The amendment supports this objective as it will facilitate higher density development
to support existing public transport services including buses and trains.
Clause 18.02-2 Cycling the objective is to integrate planning for cycling with land
use and development planning and encourage as alternative modes of travel.
Schedule 16 to the Development Plan appropriately requires the inclusion of
pedestrian and cycling routes through the site.
Clause 19.03-2 Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage the objective is to plan for
the provision of water supply, sewerage and drainage services that efficiently and
effectively meet State and community needs and protect the environment.
Relevant services will be provided to the site including, water, sewerage and
drainage.
The site is not identified as being within a Neighbourhood Character Overlay or East
Bendigo Character Precinct and is of a size and location to effectively establish its
own character without adversely impacting on adjoining land uses and development.
Consultation/Communication
The proponent has undertaken discussions with VicRoads, CFA, Coliban Water and with
internal departments of the City of Greater Bendigo prior to lodgement of documentation.
No major concerns were raised.
The documents will be publicly exhibited for a minimum of a month, as required under
the Planning and Environment Act 1987. The City must give notice of Amendments to all
owners and occupiers who may be materially affected by an Amendment, together with
prescribed Ministers and public authorities. The Amendment will also be exhibited in the
Government Gazette and the Bendigo Advertiser Newspaper.
Resource Implications
Officer time will be required to prepare the Amendment documentation for authorisation,
exhibition, manage the exhibition process and liaise with the Minister for Planning.
Additional officers time would be required in there are unresolved submissions following
exhibition and a Panel Hearing is required.
The proponent has agreed to pay for the statutory fees and extra costs incurred by the
City as per the Policy for Private Planning Scheme Amendments adopted by Council.
A planning permit will still be required in the future however it is considered this time is
negligible to the amendment as a permit would be required for the subdivision and
development of the site without these changes.
PAGE 63
Conclusion
The proposed amendment will support the strategic direction of the City by promoting
urban consolidation on an appropriately located site.
It is recommended that Council seek authorisation from the Minister for Planning to
prepare and exhibit the Amendment.
Options
Council has the option of:
Supporting the Amendment proposal and making a request to the Minister for
Planning to authorise preparation and exhibition of the Amendment.
Attachments
Explanatory report
Proposed Development Plan schedule
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council resolve to:
1. Request the Minister for Planning to authorise Council to prepare Amendment C220
to the Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme.
2. When Authorised by the Minister, exhibit Amendment C220 to the Greater Bendigo
Planning Scheme giving notification as required for the minimum statutory exhibition
period of one month.
PAGE 64
4.4
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Application details:
The subdivision of land into two 1 hectare lots; one lot will
contain an existing dwelling, the other will be vacant.
Application No:
DS/121/2016
Applicant:
Land:
Zoning:
Overlays:
No. of objections:
Key considerations:
Conclusion:
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015-2016 Update)
Planning for Growth
Housing options provide broader choice in order to meet current and future
community expectations and needs.
Productivity
Council fosters business and industry growth.
PAGE 65
Sustainability
The built and natural qualities that make Greater Bendigo an attractive and appealing
place are valued and conserved.
Report
Subject Site and Surrounds
The subject site is comprised of one parcel located on the southern side of Hannans
Road in Mandurang South. The site is rectangular in shape with an area of 2.34 hectares
and has a very slight slope to the north western end of the site. A dwelling and
associated outbuildings are located on the western end of the site. A dam is located in
the south western part of the site. Access to the site is via an existing gateway in the
north west corner of the site to Hannans Road. Secondary access is available from the
north east corner to Hannans Road. Hannans Road is a sealed rural road. A rural post
and wire fence delineates the site to the adjoining properties. Scattered native trees are
located along the Hannans Road and Queen Street road reserve frontages.
The site is described as Crown Allotment 1 Section 2, Township of Mandurang, Parish of
Mandurang.
Power and telecommunications are connected to the site. The site is reliant on water
tanks for potable water supply and a wastewater treatment system for the management
of wastewater.
The pattern of subdivision in the area is comprised of established low density residential
lots to the south, east and west. Land to the further west is zone for Rural Living
purposes. The Mandurang South recreation reserve is located to the north of the site.
The character of the area is defined by the semi-rural and bushland setting, particularly
due to the location of forested areas further to the north west and west.
PAGE 66
Proposal
This application seeks the approval of a development plan and subsequent issue of a
permit to subdivide the land into two low density residential lots.
Comment
Drainage
Public Notification
The application was informally advertised by way of notice on the site and letters to
adjoining and nearby owners and occupiers. As a result of advertising, no submissions
were received.
Planning Assessment
Development Plan Overlay Schedule 4
The DPO4 requires that lots in this area are to be at least two hectares in area. The
proposal is to subdivide the land into lots of only one hectare in area. Lots under the
minimum lot size of two hectares may be approved following consideration of the three
matters discussed below.
Will the subdivision be compatible with the general character of the area?
PAGE 68
Hannans Road is comprised of lots that range in area from 0.51 to 2.65 hectares in a
bushland and semi-rural character setting. The site is situated between Queen Street to
the east and Hunts Gap Road to the west. A planning application for a five lot
subdivision, which abuts the site to the west, is currently being assessed by the Planning
Department. These proposed lots will each have an area in excess of two hectares.
In the context of the wider neighbourhood, the lots range between 0.9 to 4.5 hectares. In
similar terms to Hannans Road, properties are characterised by larger lots with large
gardens, particularly along Mandurang South Road and Queen Street.
According to the original parish plan, the site is included in the Township of Mandurang
and the size of the crown allotments varied from 0.2 hectare to 10 hectares (see Figure
3). These smaller parcels generally form part of slightly larger landholdings, such as the
recreation reserve opposite the site on the northern side of Hannans Lane. There are
smaller lots in the area, approved under some planning permits issued in excess of 15
years ago. One example is the re-alignment of three boundaries located immediately
east of Queen Street. This was approved because it was the re-subdivision of existing
lots and no new lot was created. Research into older files failed to identify the reason for
approving smaller lots whilst being located in an area with a two hectare minimum.
The proposal fails to meets the fundamental requirements of maintaining and
strengthening the semi-rural qualities of the area. The proposed lots, being just in excess
of 1 hectare, are 50% of the area desired by the DPO. The subject site is already 2.34
hectares in area, which fits well with the rest of the precinct. It is difficult to imagine how
any new dwelling on Lot 2 could strengthen the sites semi-rural setting given the modest
size of the lots.
Although the land is zoned for low density residential purposes, its distance of
approximately 10 km from Bendigo has influenced a pattern of development more suited
to rural living type activities, including the keeping of horses. It is important that these
existing activities are encouraged in a specified area, thus reducing the problem of
conflicting interests with dwellings constructed on smaller lots.
The intent of the DPO4 is to maintain the semi-rural and bushland qualities of the area,
by managing the density of future development on generous sized lots. It is imperative
that Council supports areas designated with specific minimum lot sizes under the DPO4,
to protect the future integrity of the area. It may be argued that the eastern end of the site
(proposed Lot 2) is devoid of vegetation and there is ample space for a dwelling and
associated outbuilding. However, in reality, setting a precedent for smaller lots and
subsequent development on these lots in the area would negatively impact on the
existing unique character.
PAGE 69
Figure 3: Location of site shown in the original Township of Mandurang in the Parish of Mandurang
PAGE 70
PAGE 71
Both lots are about half the area desired by the DPO4.
The neighbourhood has developed a strong sense of place due to the nature of the
bushland and semi-rural landscape character. The creation of smaller lots would
undermine this existing character.
The subdivision will set a poor precedent that would undermine the intent of the
DPO4.
Permit Application
As stated earlier, a development plan must be approved prior to the issue of a planning
permit. The assessment of the application for the approval of a permit in a LDRZ area is
very similar to that of the development plan. Issues of neighbourhood character have
been addressed earlier in the report. It is noted that there is no reason to believe that
amenity issues would be raised by the proposed subdivision, mainly due to the
separation by stands of native vegetation.
The proposed subdivision would undoubtedly create lots that are far removed from the
intent of the DPO4, and subsequently not meet the requirements of the LDRZ, in
particular the protection and enhancement of the natural environment and character of
the area (clause 32.03-6).
Bushfire Management Overlay (BMO)
The site is affected by the BMO, due to its close proximity to forested areas. The
application was referred to the Country Fire Authority, who had no objection, subject to
the inclusion of standard conditions should a permit be issued.
Conclusion
Based on the assessment of the character of the low density residential area, the area of
both lots do not meet the meet the minimum lot size of two hectares and subsequently
does not accord with the existing or desired neighbourhood character in the manner
required by the Development Plan Overlay 4.
Options
Council, acting as the responsible authority for administering the Planning Scheme, may
resolve to: approve a development plan prior to the issue of a planning permit with
conditions or refuse a development plan prior to the issue of a refusal to grant a planning
permit.
PAGE 72
RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to Section 61 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, Greater Bendigo City
Council resolves the following with respect to the land at 51 Hannans Road, Mandurang
South 3551:
1. To refuse to grant approval for the submitted development plan. The proposed
development plan does not satisfy the requirements of Schedule 4 to the
Development Plan Overlay because:
1.1 The lot sizes shown on the plan do not accord with the preferred 2 hectare
minimum lot size specified for the Mandurang South area.
2. To refuse to grant a permit allowing the subdivision of the land into two lots for the
following reasons:
2.1 A permit cannot be granted in the absence of an approved development plan.
2.2 The proposed lot sizes are incompatible with the existing character of the area.
PAGE 73
4.5
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Application details:
The staged subdivision of the land into 57 lots (49 house lots
and 8 superlots) and the removal of native vegetation.
Application No:
DS/656/2014
Applicant:
Land:
Zoning:
Overlays:
No. of objections:
Key considerations:
Conclusion:
PAGE 74
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015-2016 Update)
Planning for Growth
Housing options provide broader choice in order to meet current and future
community expectations and needs.
Productivity
Council fosters business and industry growth.
Sustainability
The built and natural qualities that make Greater Bendigo an attractive and appealing
place are valued and conserved.
Report
Subject Site and Surrounds
The subject land consists of two land parcels: Lot 4 on Title Plan 340637P and Lot E on
Plan of Subdivision 701830Y.
The subject land forms part of the planned residential estate known as Viewpoint Huntly
which is being progressively developed in stages. Waratah Road will be extended
eastwards to cater for the estate. The subject land includes a section of the Waratah
Road extension and covers a total area of 7.89ha. The subject land is currently vacant.
Figure 1: The boundaries of the subject land (Waratah Road round-about can be seen to the
left)
PAGE 75
Proposal
It is proposed to subdivide the subject land into 57 lots, of which 49 will be lots for single
dwellings and 8 will be superlots ear-marked for future medium density housing. The lots
in the subdivision will be fully serviced.
The single dwelling lots will range in size from 300m2 to 572m2, while the superlots will
be as large as 7,269m2.
The subdivision will include the extension of Waratah Road, as well as a local street
network arranged in a roughly grid-like pattern.
Approval is sought to remove two large trees as part of the subdivision.
The lots will be subject to an Owners Corporation for the maintenance of the reserves
within the subdivision.
PAGE 76
There is an approved development plan that covers the subject land. Under DPO25 a
permit granted must be generally in accordance with this development plan.
Other relevant planning scheme provisions are:
State planning policy framework
Clause 10.02 Goal (objectives of planning in Victoria)
Clause 10.04 Integrated decision making
Clause 11.05 Regional development
Clause 11.02 Loddon Mallee South regional growth
Clause 15.01 Urban environment
Clause 15.02 Sustainable development
Clause 16.01 Residential development
Clause 19.03 Development infrastructure
Local planning policy framework
Clause 22 Municipal strategic statement
Clause 22.04 Salinity and erosion risk policy
PAGE 77
Other provisions
Clause 32.08 General residential zone
Clause 43.04 Development plan overlay
Clause 52.16 Native vegetation precinct plan
Clause 56 Residential subdivision
Clause 65 Decision guidelines
Clause 66 Referral and notice provisions.
Consultation/Communication
Referrals
The following authorities and internal departments were consulted on the proposal:
Referral
Comment
Coliban Water
Powercor
AusNet Services
VicRoads
Public Notification
The application is exempt from third party rights of objection and review pursuant to the
DPO4. Public notice of the application was not given. Even so, a neighbouring property
owner became aware of the application and lodged an objection on the following
grounds:
Stormwater run-off from the subdivision to Sawmill Road and a nearby water race;
The blocking of access to the objectors property as a result of the subdivision.
Planning Assessment
Background
Before assessing the planning merits of the proposal it is useful to explain some
background.
PAGE 78
In 2012 a development plan was approved for a 110ha site within the Huntly New
Development Area (NDA). The development plan provides for the subdivision of the site
into an 815 lot housing estate. The subdivision will occur in stages. The current permit
application broadly corresponds with one of those stages.
The development plan was prepared by the property development company, Integra
Group. Integra has finished the first few stages of the estate, which has been marketed
as Viewpoint Huntly.
A consortium of other parties, led by Project Management Australia (PMA), proposes to
buy the remaining share of Viewpoint Huntly from Integra and complete the estate under
the re-branded name Hermitage West.
PMA has a history in the Huntly NDA. It was the proponent of an ambitious residential
development known as Hermitage East, involving residentially zoned land to the east of
Viewpoint Huntly. A development plan was approved for Hermitage East in 2014.
Hermitage East was controversial because it relied on a land banking scheme for
financing purposes. The project is currently being liquidated following action by the
Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC).
Upon approval of Hermitage East, PMA subsequently focussed its attention upon
Hermitage West (the name PMA has given to the remaining stages of Viewpoint Huntly).
In 2014 PMA engaged the town planning firm Spiire to obtain a planning permit for the
first stage of Hermitage West. The resulting permit application lodged by Spiire is the
subject of this report.
Despite initial enthusiasm for Hermitage West, PMA has lately been difficult to contact
and obtain instructions from. It is unclear whether PMA still wants the permit application
to proceed. In the absence of proper instructions, Spiire will not withdraw the application;
so Council is obliged to decide on the application.
For the reasons that will be explained later in this report, a permit ought not to be granted
for the proposed development. There are deficiencies with the application. The issues
are not insurmountable but PMA has been unwilling or unable to adequately address
them. Close to two years has now elapsed since the permit application was lodged. It is
now time to bring the application to a conclusion.
The main issue
The main obstacle to a permit being granted concerns the implementation of a
Development Contributions Plan (DCP).
The City has prepared a DCP for the Huntly NDA. Under the DCP land owners will be
required to make a contribution to certain local infrastructure when they subdivide their
land. It is intended that the DCP will be included into the Planning Scheme via an
amendment. Until such time as the Planning Scheme is amended, the DCP can only be
implemented by voluntary agreement with each land owner. Section 173 of the Planning
and Environment Act provides for such agreements.
There are two problems preventing the progress of a DCP Agreement in this case.
PAGE 79
First, PMA has not settled payment for preparing and executing a DCP Agreement. The
Citys lawyers are ready to prepare a DCP Agreement on behalf of PMA but, on
instructions, are awaiting up-front payment before starting work. Given PMAs uncertain
financial position and its involvement in the failed Hermitage East project, the City could
easily find itself out-of-pocket if it invoiced PMA after the work was completed.
Second, PMA is not the owner of the subject land; the land is owned by Integra and W T
& N W Gooding. It remains to be seen whether the actual land owners will sign a DCP
Agreement.
A DCP Agreement in this case should be executed before a permit is granted. This is
because agreements are voluntary instruments and should not be imposed as a permit
condition lest the applicant be inclined to challenge the validity of the condition. So, until
such time as the above problems are resolved it would not be prudent to approve the
proposed subdivision.
PMA has been given ample time to address these issues but has made no meaningful
progress towards doing so.
Other issues
The application is deficient in terms of the boundaries of the subdivision. The lots will be
created from the subdivision of two existing land parcels; together they comprise the
subject land. The subject land covers an area that is larger than the area actually shown
on the proposed subdivision plan. In point of fact, the proposed subdivision will create 57
house lots plus a balance lot encompassing the remainder of the subject land. The
balance lot is not accounted for by the proposal. This issue needs to be addressed.
One curious aspect of the proposal is the plan to create an Owners Corporation.
Ordinarily an Owners Corporation would only be necessary to manage common property
such as driveways and car parking areas that are in communal ownership. In this case,
PMA wants future residents to have some on-going financial responsibility for the Council
roads and public spaces within the subdivision. As PMAs town planning report explains
the Owners Corporation will have the ability to provide for higher levels of maintenance
of these public areas at the cost of the Owners Corporation. This is quite an unusual
approach and PMA has provided few details about how it might work in practice. In the
absence of such details one cannot be certain of what burden the Owners Corporation
may impose on the City in relation to the future public assets within the subdivision.
The development plan
Notwithstanding the issues identified above, the proposed subdivision will be generally
consistent with the development plan that has been approved for the area. The
subdivision will be centred upon the extension of Waratah Road, as shown on the
development plan, and will incorporate a grid-like pattern of local streets. The subdivision
will facilitate housing development at a mix of densities which is an aim of the
development plan.
PAGE 80
PAGE 81
PAGE 82
PAGE 83
Options
Council, acting as the responsible authority for administering the Planning Scheme, may
resolve to: grant a permit, grant a permit with conditions, or refuse to grant a permit.
Attachments
Objection
RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to section 61 of the Planning and Environment Act, Greater Bendigo City
Council resolve to refuse to grant a permit for the staged subdivision of Lot A and CA 8
Sawmill Road, Huntly, into 57 lots and the removal of native vegetation, for the following
reasons:
1.
The subdivision will make inadequate provision for the public infrastructure
identified in the Huntly Development Contributions Plan dated 10 February 2015.
2.
The subdivision will create a balance lot that has not been properly accounted for.
3.
The Owners Corporation that will apply to the subdivision may have a detrimental
impact on the Citys management of the roads and other public spaces within the
subdivision.
PAGE 84
4.6
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
This report provides a copy of the City of Greater Bendigo submission into Infrastructure
Victorias All Things Considered paper exploring options for Victorias 30-year
infrastructure strategy and seeks endorsement of that submission. The options paper
was released on 18 May 2016 and required submissions to be forwarded to
Infrastructure Victoria by 17 June 2016. The short consultation period did not allow for a
submission to be prepared in time to be placed on an earlier Council agenda. The
development of the submission has been informed by input from relevant City staff.
The submission supports the preparation of a 30-year infrastructure strategy for Victoria.
The options paper outlines a series of over 200 options or projects in relation to the
provision of infrastructure across the state. The submission responds to the most
relevant of these based on adopted policies and consistency with the work Council is
undertaking. It also sets out where it sees gaps in the current series of options as they
relate to Greater Bendigo.
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
Leadership and Good Governance Strategy 1.3 Contribute to policy and strategy
development being led by government and other agencies
Background Information
On the 18 May 2016 Infrastructure Victoria released All things considered as an
important step in developing a 30-year infrastructure strategy for Victoria. At the same
time it has provided a full description and preliminary assessment of each option. At this
stage only options are provided with no recommendations. Infrastructure Victoria has
called for submissions into the paper including the current list of options, as well as any
which are not currently included but should be.
The options have been grouped into 19 chapters within the All things considered options
paper. These include:
Address infrastructure demands in areas with high population growth;
PAGE 85
A submission (attached) was drafted with input from relevant CoGB staff and responds to
the most relevant options for Council, following review of both the All Things Considered
options paper combined with the draft options book.
Report
The City of Greater Bendigo submission supports the preparation of a 30-year
infrastructure strategy for Victoria and appreciates the opportunity to contribute views
and ideas early in the process.
Overall while a number of options could be deemed positive the City considers there
should be a stronger focus on the provision of infrastructure in regional cities to drive
investment, population increases and to retain knowledge to relieve some of the
pressure on Melbourne. Currently the paper groups all local governments as if they are
a single entity but the capacity and focus of infrastructure delivery varies widely
depending on the municipality and this needs to be considered.
The City submission outlines that the focus should be on infrastructure projects which will
enhance the liveability and wellbeing of the population consistent with Councils vision.
While there are already a huge array of options provided, the submission outlines some
currently omitted projects which are important to the future sustainable and economic
growth of the city. These include:
Bendigo Metro Rail project;
More climate change mitigation measures;
Education, training and employment opportunities;
Heritage;
Infrastructure capacity assessment (ensuring existing infrastructure can copy with
larger development); and
Water management.
PAGE 86
Priority/Importance:
The final outcomes of this process are important as it will establish an infrastructure
strategy for Victoria over a 30-year period which may have significant implications for
Greater Bendigo.
Options/Alternatives:
The Council has the option of endorsing the submission or amending it.
Timelines:
A draft strategy will be released later in the year with the final strategy due to be
delivered by the end of 2016.
Consultation/Communication
Internal consultation from staff with particular interests and responsibility related to future
planning.
Conclusion
The release of a 30-year infrastructure strategy for Victoria, while positive, could have
significant impacts for Greater Bendigo depending on infrastructure priorities. It is
important for Council to remain involved in the discussion throughout the development of
this strategy.
Resource Implications
Not applicable.
Attachments
1.
The City of Greater Bendigo submission to the All Things Considered Exploring
options for Victorias 30-year infrastructure strategy.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council resolve to endorse the submission to the All
Things Considered Exploring options for Victorias 30-year infrastructure strategy.
PAGE 87
PAGE 88
PAGE 89
PAGE 90
PAGE 91
PAGE 92
PAGE 93
PAGE 94
PAGE 95
PAGE 96
PAGE 97
PAGE 98
4.7
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Seek approval to release the Draft Environment Strategy for public comment for a period
of four weeks.
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013-2017 (2015-2016 Update):
Theme: 1
Strategic Objective 1
Theme 2
Strategic Objective 2
Strategic Objective 3
Theme 3
Strategy 3.1.4
Theme: 4
Productivity
Strategy 4.1
Strategy 4.2
Theme: 5
Sustainability
Strategy 5.1.2
Strategy 5.4
wisely.
Regional Plan Reference:
Loddon Mallee Regional Strategic Plan (2015-2018):
Strategic Direction: 1
Strategic Direction: 3
Strategic Direction: 4
Background Information
The City of Greater Bendigos third environment strategy titled Natural Environment
Strategy 2007-2010 was very successful. The strategy attracted approximately
$6,400,000 to the region including the Lighting the Regions project ($5.25M) and of the
53 actions, only 3 were not progressed at all, primarily due to lack of clarity of intended
outcome from the action.
While the policy directions within the Natural Environment Strategy have stood the test of
time and are still relevant, those actions that could be undertaken have been completed,
many of which are now embedded within the organisation as business as usual. The
City recognised that it was time to develop its fourth strategy with new and exciting
directions leading to improved environmental sustainability for Greater Bendigo.
The project plan for the new strategy was developed in late 2014 and a budget allocation
requested for 2015/2016. The budget allocation was to support the engagement
activities and the layout and design of the document. The majority of the work was to be
undertaken by Sustainable Environment Unit staff.
The Sustainable Environment Advisory Committee (SEAC) took on oversight of the
strategy development.
Report
Work commenced in-house to develop the strategy in early 2015. The engagement plan
and communication collateral was developed and community engagement commenced
in June 2015 with the launch of the project.
PAGE 100
The initial three community forums (June to August) were aimed at building knowledge
and dialogue about specific issues; living and working sustainably, biodiversity, planning
and development and renewable energy. Each of these interesting forums where well
attended and community engaged in discussion with expert panel (forums video
recorded and posted on-line).
As a draw card, Costa Georgiadis was invited to inspire and encourage participants at an
all-day workshop to contribute ideas to help set Greater Bendigos Environmental and
Sustainability directions for the next 20 years. Several City staff and SEAC members
supported by experts including Dja Dja Wurrung Group, Coliban Water, DELWP,
NCCMA, Parks Victoria, e+ Architecture and Bendigo Sustainability Group facilitated a
number of table discussions. This discussion resulted in approximately 800 suggestions
from the 80 participants.
In addition, Costa ran an event at the Botanical Gardens on the Friday before the
workshop with five year 6 students from the eight schools. Education session were run
at each school prior to the day at which the students were asked to develop a mural
depicting what they want the environment to look like in 20 years. Each school told their
story to Costa who expertly built on the stories to encourage the kids. The most
compelling message that Costa had for the kids is It is up to you to do the work, dont
stand back and wait for someone else to do it.
People contributed comments at a number of listening posts held in partnership with the
Citys Strategy Unit, and at a number of community events such as Sustainable House
Day and Sustainability Fair. The information gathered to this point was then collated to
support the writing of a consultation paper for further targeted engagement.
Due to a number of staff vacancies in the Sustainable Environment Unit, RMCG was
engaged at this point to develop the consultation paper and to work with staff to develop
the draft Strategy. A further phase of consultation including Councillors, City staff,
Traditional Owner Groups and business contributed to shaping the consultation paper to
the current Draft Environment Strategy.
The draft Greater Bendigo Environment Strategy sets a 20-year vision for our
municipality, recognising that many of the challenges and opportunities in environmental
sustainability need continuous action.
To ensure we achieve the 20-year vision, the strategy covers ten long-term action areas,
which are based on the ten guiding principles of One Planet Living, adapted to our local
context. The draft strategy also identifies three flagship projects for Council to drive over
the next five years.
The flagship projects chosen for this strategy address many action areas and have
multiple benefits for our city and rural communities. In committing to these flagship
projects, Council also recognises that nothing is more certain than change and the
strategy will need to evolve in response to changes and opportunities that may arise over
the next five years. In this respect, the strategy can be viewed as a working document
one that will guide Council effort, but also allow flexibility to respond to changes and
make the most of opportunities. For this reason the strategy does not contain detail
PAGE 101
about the implementation of the actions; instead these will be documented in the Citys
annual action plans (refer to Attachment 2).
SEAC members considered that it was important for the strategic goals within the
strategy to be applicable to all the people of Greater Bendigo and that some ideas on
how as individuals we can contribute should be included. This is reflected in the two
sections under What Council will do and What community can do.
Whilst the Environment Strategy will be a stand-alone document, it is integrated into a
suite of high-level strategies that are shaping Greater Bendigo. The Environment
Strategy will align with and influence these strategies, including Connecting Greater
Bendigo (ITLUS), the Economic Development Strategy, the Municipal Public Health and
Wellbeing Plan, Greater Bendigo Public Space Plan and the Residential Strategy.
Priority/Importance
To achieve our goal of becoming the most liveable regional city, the City and broader
community will need social, economic and environmental sustainability to underpin how
we live and work.
Council has a Municipal Public Health and Wellbeing plan, a recently adopted Economic
Development Strategy and multiple other strategies driving improved wellbeing and
economic outcomes. This draft strategy provides the necessary drivers to contribute to
achieving the environmental outcomes that the community aspires to and needs; clean
air and water and a healthy natural environment.
Consultation/Communication
SEAC members have contributed content, provided a huge amount of time energy and
skill to the consultation effort, influenced the structure (One Planet 10 principles), and
provided comment on a number of versions of the draft strategy. Their combined efforts
and feedback have been valued and appreciated.
External Consultation
The consultation period commenced June 2015.
Listening posts 6
PAGE 102
Written submissions 5
Internal Consultation
Further consultation will be conducted through the draft consultation period to refine
actions and nominate the Business Unit manager responsible for implementation.
Resource Implications
What is the financial cost to Council?
A budget allocation of $45,000 was approved for this current year.
Initiatives and actions arising from the final adopted strategy will be subject to funding
consideration by Councillors on an annual basis during the usual budget process.
Staff Resources
Significant time from a number of staff across the organisation has contributed to the
development of this strategy.
Conclusion
This Draft Environment Strategy focusses on the connection of people to the
environment across the 10 principles of the One Planet format. It draws the link between
wellbeing and environmental health, reminds us of the human need for clean water, air
and food and the role we all have in ensuring resources are used fairly.
This draft strategy presents a positive future with significant benefit to people and the
environment. It also represents a desire to be inquisitive, innovative and brave in dealing
with the challenges of climate change and to ensure our community is best placed to
recognise and grasp opportunities that may arise from change.
The draft Strategy has already benefited from significant input from interested members
of the community including SEAC and it is now considered appropriate to gain further
input from the wider community to progress its finalisation.
PAGE 103
Attachments
1. CoGB Draft Environment Strategy
2. Action Plan 2016/17
RECOMMENDATION
That Greater Bendigo City Council approves exhibition of the Draft Environment Strategy
for the purpose of public comment over a four week period.
PAGE 104
5.
5.1
Document Information
Authors
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
To seek Council endorsement of the Commercial Fitness Operator Policy and
implementation of a twelve month trial period.
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015-2016 Update)
Theme 3 - Presentation and Vibrancy
3.1 Greater Bendigo has attractive and accessible parks, public places and
streetscapes that are widely used, and enable people to be healthy and active
3.1.2 Implement community strategies, policies and projects that support active
healthy living, including updating the planning framework and applying the
results of the Active Living Census.
Strategy Reference:
Greater Bendigo Public Health and Wellbeing Plan 2013-2017
The Greater Bendigo Public Health and Wellbeing Plan (2013 2017) identified the
strategic direction: Our community's health and wellbeing improves over time.
Actions to achieve this strategic direction include:
PAGE 106
Report
A key component in achieving Councils vision of Working together to be Australias most
liveable regional city is facilitating a range of opportunities for the community to be
physically active, to improve health and wellbeing outcomes.
Greater Bendigo is rated amongst the worst in the state of Victoria when it comes to
physical activity rates. It has a high rate of inactive adult residents, with 8.3% of adults
reporting they did not undertake any physical activity in the previous week. The Victorian
Population Health Survey (VPHS) 2011-12 shows that only 4 Victorian municipalities
have a higher rate of inactive residents than Greater Bendigo.
The City is committed to improving the health of residents and accordingly, is developing
targets for improving health in the municipality, including two relating to physical activity.
Local physical activity targets relate to:
Reducing the rate of sedentary / inactive residents
Increasing the rate of residents meeting NHMRC physical activity guidelines
These targets enable progress towards health-related goals to be tracked, and they also
demonstrate the Citys commitment to community health.
The National Health and Medical Research Council have recently updated their
guidelines on recommended levels of physical activity to include not only cardiovascular
activity, but also strength training activities. Of the leisure activities most commonly
undertaken by females, fitness / gym and personal training activities are one of very few
that offer this recommended strength training component. Therefore the provision of
outdoor fitness activities is seen as an important way for people, particularly women, to
meet the guidelines around physical activity.
In Greater Bendigo, participation rates are high in commercial fitness activities such as
fitness/gym and personal training. Fitness operators cater for a variety of residents,
particularly females aged 1849, with one in four young women participating in
fitness/gym, and three times the rate of females as males undertaking personal training
activities.
The Active Living Census results, along with community feedback and fitness industry
trends led to the development of the policy. According to Fitness Australia, Australias
peak health and fitness industry association, one of the most significant recent growth
areas in the Australian Fitness Industry has been the emergence of services offered in
an outdoor setting.
This policy aims to manage a range of activities in a manner that balances industry
needs, provides protection of natural assets and maintains community access and
amenity.
The policy establishes a user agreement system and outlines the conditions of use of the
Citys passive reserves and sporting grounds. The policy applies to all commercial
operators who use public land under the operational control of the City for the provision
of fitness activities for financial gain.
PAGE 107
The main policy structure includes: purpose, policy statement, background, scope and
policy information. The policy has been populated based on community feedback,
research into other local government policies and policy recommendations from Fitness
Australia.
Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is to effectively manage the use of Public Land under the
care, control and management of Council for the purpose of conducting commercial
fitness operations.
Policy statement:
City of Greater Bendigo is committed to working to be Australias most liveable
regional city.
The City recognises that commercial operators offer activities that provide
economic, social and physical wellbeing benefits to the Greater Bendigo
Community.
The objective of this policy is to support suitable commercial fitness activities, whilst
ensuring balance with the rights of all community members to access public land.
Scope:
Commercial operators using public land under the operational control of the City for
the provision of fitness activities for financial gain.
Policy information:
Qualifications and Insurance:
Sets eligibility criteria
Locations:
Passive reserves and sporting grounds
Exclusion zones / restrictions
Activities:
Permissible activities
Excluded activities
Group sizes
User agreement system:
Applications in line with sporting club seasonal agreements process (summer /
winter)
No booking fees for implementation trial period of twelve months.
General conditions
PAGE 108
Priority/Importance:
Developing the draft policy is of high importance as it will contribute to achieving the
Council vision and enable the City to deliver upon actions from the Council Plan 2013
2017 (2015/16 update), specifically:
3.1.2
Implementation of the policy will assist the City to understand demands on our public
open space: where, when and who is using them. It will also provide clarity to the
community regarding the Citys management of commercial fitness operators.
Extensive consultation has occurred in the development of this policy and there is an
expectation from participants that Council will address the policy in the coming months
Timelines:
The policy establishes a user agreement system, which is in line with the Citys
summer/winter sporting club season agreement process. Fitness Operator applications
will be received on a seasonal basis and user agreements are valid for a 6 month period.
If the Policy and implementation trial is endorsed by Council, applications will be opened
as soon as practical via an online system and ready to align with the seasonal
application process.
The twelve month implementation trial will officially commence 1 October 2016 with the
start of the summer season.
The implementation trial will conclude 30 September 2017 with the conclusion of the
winter season. A policy review, including further community consultation, will occur
following this period, and a report prepared for Councils consideration
Risk Analysis:
Whilst there has been strong support from all stakeholders to develop and implement the
policy, there is still the risk that some fitness operators resisting an uptake of the new
process. The strong engagement process undertaken during the development of the
Draft Policy will help to mitigate this risk.
The twelve month implementation trial with no booking fees aims to achieve maximum
uptake of the new user agreement system, while giving the City the opportunity to review
and analyse the system to evaluate its effectiveness and identify any issues with the
proposal.
PAGE 109
Consultation/Communication
Internal Consultation:
The Policy has been developed with internal input through a range of forums. Internal
consultation dates back to the development of the Sport and Leisure Framework in 2012.
More recently, an internal consultation workshop occurred in February 2015 at which
general support was provided for the proposed direction of a user agreement system.
An internal consultation meeting in October 2015 was attended by officers from various
units across the organisation with a direct stake in the Draft Policy, including Engineering
and Public Space, Environmental Health and Local Laws, and Parks and Natural
Reserves. There was general support, with valuable input regarding the technical policy
components.
External Consultation:
Fitness Australia has been consulted in preparing the Policy to ensure its consistency
with their policy recommendations.
The community consultation process for this project includes engagement with Fitness
Operators via a number of workshops during 2015. These workshops were successful
with attendees identifying a clear and recognised need for the implementation of a
formalised system. A recent feedback forum held in November 2015 was attended by 11
Fitness Operators from 8 businesses. There was overall support of the proposed user
agreement system, with specific feedback including:
Fitness Operators who were unable to attend the workshop were invited to provide
feedback, with 20 Operators in total engaged.
The community consultation process has also involved the collection of general
community feedback over the past few years. A number of community members have
raised concerns via email and phone regarding Fitness Operators accessing passive
reserves and the impact on community access and amenity. The clear need for a
management system has been put forward by community members
A summary of feedback from the Fitness Operator Forum held November 2015 can be
found in Attachment 2.
During the trial the City will gather feedback from members of the public to determine the
effect of the Policy and if any alterations to the Policy are required. A range of
consultation methods will be used including direct and online engagement, with the
opportunity for members of the public to put in submissions.
PAGE 110
Resource Implications
Administrative duties such as processing bookings and preparing user agreements will
be managed within existing staff resources of the Active and Healthy Communities Unit.
The 12 month trial period will allow time to monitor acceptance or otherwise of the policy
and to gain a clear understanding if any extra resources are required to deliver all
aspects of the policy.
Conclusion
To improve health and wellbeing outcomes the City aims to facilitate a range of sport and
leisure opportunities for enabling the community to be physically active.
The rise in outdoor fitness activity is a positive health and wellbeing outcome, however
this should be balanced with the competing demands of use of public open space.
The Commercial Fitness Operator Policy has been developed to manage these activities
in a manner that balances industry needs, provides protection of natural assets and
maintains community access and amenity.
The policy establishes a user agreement system and outlines the conditions of use of the
Citys passive reserves and sporting grounds.
This report seeks Councils endorsement of the policy and approval to implement the
policy for a trial period of 12months.
Attachments
1. Commercial Fitness Operator Policy
2. Fitness Operator Forum Feedback Summary
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Endorse the Commercial Fitness Operator Policy.
2. Approve an implementation trial period of twelve months with no booking fees,
commencing as soon as practical.
3. Consult with members of the public during the trial to determine the effect of the
Policy.
4. Receive a report on the outcomes of the trial period upon its completion.
PAGE 111
PAGE 112
PAGE 113
PAGE 114
PAGE 115
PAGE 116
5.2
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
The purpose of this report is for Council to consider recommendations for community
appointments to the Greater Bendigo Disability Inclusion Reference Committee.
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
This report is consistent with the following Council Plan 2013-2017 themes and
strategies:
Theme 1 Leadership and Good Governance
Strategy 1.4 Community engagement strategies and methods are adapted and
updated to improve how the community can receive information in an accessible
form and provide feedback to Council.
Theme 3 Presentation and Vibrancy
Strategy 3.6 Greater Bendigo has inclusive and equitable communities where
people feel welcome and connected to others.
Strategy 3.7 Structured community engagement, community planning and
community development programs support our residents and communities,
particularly those who may experience isolation.
Strategy Reference:
This report is also consistent with the following Community Access and Inclusion Plan
2015 2018 objectives and actions:
Objective 3 Promote inclusion and participation in the community of persons with a
disability.
Action 3.12 Develop a Disability Advisory Group (or similar) that will provide advice,
advocate and undertake initiatives that support greater social inclusion of persons with a
disability and their families / carers.
PAGE 117
Background Information
The need to develop a Disability Inclusion Reference Committee (DIRC) was identified
during the consultation phase for the development of the Community Access and
Inclusion Plan 2015 2018.
The DIRC is being developed to provide advice, advocate and undertake initiatives that
support greater social inclusion of persons with a disability and their families/carers.
The City has not had a DIRC previously; therefore the effectiveness of the group will be
reviewed three years after its initial establishment.
Previous Council Decision(s) Date(s):
10 June 2015:
25 November 2015:
Report
Expressions of Interest for membership of the DIRC were publically sought during the
first three weeks of May 2016 and closed on 23 May 2016. This opportunity was
promoted through: articles and advertisements in local newspapers, community
newsletters, radio advertisements, a video developed for internet and social media use,
advertisement screens at the Bendigo Library and City offices, relevant email networks
plus Councils website and social media accounts.
Expressions of Interest were invited in accordance with the DIRC Terms of Reference
membership requirements, as follows:
(a) Membership of the Disability Inclusion Reference Committee will consist of:
nominated Councillor(s); and
community representatives who are persons with diverse disabilities; and
community representatives who are unpaid carers of persons with disability,
ideally with at least 1 carer of a child and 1 carer of an adult; and
representatives from local disability-specific agencies; and
representatives from local organisations or networks that have influence on social
inclusion for persons with a disability.
Membership should always weigh in favour of the number of community
representatives and unpaid carers versus agency and City representation.
The Committee will have a maximum of 17 members; 8 community representatives, 4
disability agency and local organisation representatives, and 5 representatives from
the City including Councillors.
Each applicant was requested to respond to three Key Selection Criteria questions in
order to assist with assessment of their relevant knowledge / experience.
PAGE 118
47 eligible Expressions of Interest for membership of the DIRC were received for a total
of 12 available positions across the community representative and disability agency and
local organisation representative categories. Details of all 47 applicants are included
within Confidential Attachment 1.
For shortlisting purposes, the 47 applications were divided into three categories: unpaid
carers (12), persons with a disability (21) and representatives from community
organisations/networks (14). Applicants from persons with a disability and unpaid carers
were shortlisted for interview by the Citys Coordinator Inclusive Communities and
Disability Inclusion Officer.
The 12 unpaid carers and 21 persons with a disability were shortlisted on the basis of
their responses to the three Key Selection Criteria questions, with a particular focus on
advocacy and inclusion knowledge / experience. Other shortlisting considerations
included gender and diverse disability type (e.g. intellectual, physical and sensory)
representation. In total, 15 individuals (7 unpaid carers and 8 persons with a disability)
were offered interviews for the available 8 community representative positions.
The Interview Panel (Panel) was comprised of Cr Rod Campbell and the Citys Acting
Manager Community Partnerships and Senior Disability Inclusion Officer. 14 of the 15
invited applicants participated in the interviews. At the completion of the interviews, the
Panel was unanimous about the 8 applicants it wishes to recommend to Council for
membership of the DIRC. It is the Panels opinion that these 8 applicants all individually
satisfied the Key Selection Criteria, and collectively offer an excellent mix of enthusiasm,
disability inclusion knowledge, personal experience, advocacy and leadership skills, and
connections with the wider disability community. A summary of the 8 recommended
applicants key knowledge / experience is provided within Confidential Attachment 2. It is
the Panels opinion that the remaining 7 applicants, whilst having demonstrated
knowledge / experience in their respective areas, did not satisfy one or more of the Key
Selection Criteria as strongly as the recommended applicants.
The representatives from community organisations/networks (14 applicants) were
shortlisted to 8 applicants by the Citys Senior Disability Inclusion Officer and Disability
Inclusion Officer. The applicants were shortlisted on the basis of their responses to the
three Key Selection Criteria questions with a particular focus on social inclusion,
advocacy and the needs of the broader disability community. The details of the 8
shortlisted applicants were then provided to the Panel for consideration. The Panel was
also unanimous about the 4 community organisation/network applicants it wishes to
recommend to Council for membership of the DIRC. It is the Panels opinion that these 4
applicants all individually satisfied the Key Selection Criteria and will bring a wealth of
disability sector knowledge and extensive community networks that they can share
information with / influence. Details of the 4 recommended applicants are included within
Confidential Attachment 2.
The appointment of these 12 applicants will finalise the DIRC community representative
recruitment process, with all available positions being filled.
PAGE 119
In accordance with the DIRCs Terms of Reference, half the community representatives
need to be appointed for a 1 year appointment and the other half for a 2 year term. The
term of appointment for each recommended applicant has been nominated depending on
applicants preferences or as determined by the Panel refer Confidential Attachment 2.
The selection of the internal representatives from the City will be by request of the Panel
and based on representation from each Directorate and staff whose responsibilities can
influence social inclusion of persons with a disability. There are 4 places available and
preference will be given to staff with Community Access and Inclusion Plan
responsibilities. These 4 internal representatives are yet to be determined.
Consultation/Communication
External Consultation:
In addition to the community engagement opportunities outlined earlier in this report, the
Citys Disability Inclusion team presented on the DIRC and its membership opportunities
to the Having a Say group, a local self-advocacy group. Additionally, the team
responded to numerous enquiries from interested community members and service
providers during the Expression of Interest period.
Resource Implications
The Citys Disability Inclusion Officers will facilitate the functioning of the DIRC. The City
will provide any disability-related support required of members to enable their
participation in the DIRC. The Citys commitment to this administrative and inclusive
practices support is outlined in the DIRCs Terms of Reference.
The level of resources the City may be able to allocate to the various issues and
opportunities the DIRC may identify as priorities will need to be assessed on a case by
case basis.
Conclusion
The establishment of a Disability Inclusion Reference Committee (DIRC) has been high
on the Greater Bendigo disability communitys agenda for many years and was formally
identified during the consultation for the development of the Community Access and
Inclusion Plan 20152018. Council subsequently endorsed the establishment of the
DIRC and its Terms of Reference at the 25 November 2015 Council Meeting.
In accordance with the DIRCs Terms of Reference, Expressions of Interest for
membership of the DIRC were publically sought throughout May 2016.
47 eligible applications for DIRC membership were received in total. Following
shortlisting and interview processes and ensuring consistency with the Terms of
Reference, six persons with a disability and two unpaid carers have been recommended
for membership of the DIRC. 4 applicants from local disability specific agencies and local
organisations / networks have also been recommended for membership.
PAGE 120
The selection of the internal representatives from the City is yet to be determined and will
be managed by the Panel.
Attachments
Confidential Attachment 1:
Confidential Attachment 2:
RECOMMENDATION
That the Greater Bendigo City Council resolve to:
1.
Appoint the following persons to the Disability Inclusion Reference Committee for
the listed terms:
1 year term:
Lyn Hartland
Andrew Barrett
Jessica Stone
Margaret Harvey
Sharyn Laugher
Robert Colbourne
2.
2 year term:
Tristan Coote
Sara McQueenie
Daniel Giles
Helen Reimers
Ann-Maree Davis
Jane Worsley-Allot
Write to all applicants to thank them for their interest in the Disability Inclusion
Reference Committee and formally advise them of the outcome of their
Expression of Interest in membership.
PAGE 121
5.3
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
Council has been requested to nominate a Councillor to take on the role of independent
chairperson of the Lake Eppalock Land & On Water Management Plan Implementation
Working Group (the Group). This report provides information about the Group and
recommends Council nominate a representative Councillor.
Policy Context
This report is consistent with the Council Plan 2013 17 (2015 16 Update). It
considers the Council Plan themes of Leadership and Good Governance which supports
standard of service delivery and Presentation and Vibrancy which supports experiences
and activities for improved health and wellbeing.
Council Plan Reference:
Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015 2016 Update)
1.6 Programs, projects and services are guided by best practice principles and delivered
to respond to community needs.
3.1 Greater Bendigo has attractive and accessible parks, public spaces and streetscapes
that are widely used, and enable people to be healthy and active.
3.2 Residents and visitors are able to access good quality sports and recreational leisure
facilities that are fit for purpose and enable them to celebrate their active artistic, cultural,
sporting and social lives.
Regional Strategic Plan Reference:
This report is consistent with the strategic directions outlined within the Loddon Mallee
Regional Strategic Plan 2015 18 and is associated with the following priority actions of:
Strategic Direction 3: Enhance the wellbeing and economic participation of our
people.
Strategic Direction 4: Protect and enhance the liveability and appeal of our region.
PAGE 122
Background Information
Lake Eppalock is a major attraction for those engaging in water sports, with a number of
tourist parks and accommodation facilities located around the lake. Activities like high
speed boating, water skiing, sailing, canoeing and fishing are all popular on the lake.
Construction of Lake Eppalock commenced in 1960 and was completed in 1964. In 1962
the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission agreed to proposals for the development
of recreational facilities on the marginal land around the lake.
Of the 108 sites originally set aside around the perimeter of Lake Eppalock
approximately 40 are now occupied under leases of up to 30 years. Leases include
church, school and social clubs and commercial enterprises such as caravan parks.
Public areas provide facilities for day visitors including toilets, boat ramps and picnic and
barbecue facilities.
Planning, management and resourcing of land an on-water issues has in the past tended
to be reactive rather than proactive with no integrated overarching plans for the
management of both land and on-water issues.
Land and On-Water Management Plans are being developed for all of the GoulburnMurray Water storages through an extensive process of engagement with communities
to ensure the Plans have strong community support for their implementation.
The Lake Eppalock Land and On-Water Management Plan (the Plan) aims to increase
communication, consistency, coordination and cooperation between agencies
stakeholder groups and the community to protect the lakes values and attributes.
Management of water levels in Lake Eppalock and operational issues, including lake
levels and the management of releases, are questions beyond the scope of the Plan.
(Lake Eppalock Land and On-Water Management Plan 2013, p.3)
Recently, Goulburn-Murray Water wrote to the City seeking that Council nominate a
Councillor to take the role of independent Chairperson of the Group.
Report
The Lake Eppalock Land and On-Water Management Plan Implementation Group will
play an important role in enabling the Lake Eppalock community and various user groups
to have ongoing input into the implementation of the actions identified in the Plan and
help ensure identification and management of any new issues arising.
The functions of the Group will be:
(a) To provide advice to GMWs representative
(b) To help guide the priorities for implementation of the Plan
(c) To advise on community engagement activities, such as informing and raising
community awareness on the importance of environmental issues in the local area
PAGE 123
PAGE 124
Progress:
Agencies have met under the auspices of Goulburn-Murray Water (GM Water) on three
occasions. Expressions of Interest have been called from the community and a number
of local residents and interest groups have been accepted onto the Group.
Risk Analysis:
Council is being requested to provide an independent chairperson for the Group and also
has an officer representing the organisation. It is not the role of the Council to lead
implementation or take responsibility for non-City of Greater Bendigo assets. Council
should recognise and manage the risk that an expectation could be created that the City
fund asset renewal or operational servicing of GM Water assets and services.
Consultation/Communication
During the development of the Lake Eppalock Land and On-Water Management Plan
participants involved in the consultation expressed support for the formation of a Plan
Implementation Group for the lake.
For this plan, is was agreed that an Implementation Group would be established that
would include community representatives, business owners/industry representatives and
key agency representatives.
Expressions of Interest were advertised and individual groups were notified of the
process seeking community representation on the group. Individuals were interviewed by
GM Water representatives and have been accepted onto the group.
Further consultation will be required throughout implementation of the Plan.
Resource Implications
The City has a staff member representing the organisation as part of the Group. A
Councillor has been requested to take the role of independent Chairperson. The Chair is
supported by GM Water administrational assistance.
Conclusion
GM Water developed a Lake Eppalock Land and On-Water Management Plan in 2013
and is seeking to establish an Implementation Group with a Councillor as the
independent chairperson. Council has no operational control or asset ownership of this
site but recognises the value of the asset to the community.
Meetings of the group would occur 3-4 times per year with representatives from
government agencies and local stakeholders appointed via an Expression of Interest
process.
Given the significance of the waterway to the Greater Bendigo community, it is
considered appropriate that a Councillor could provide the function of independent
chairperson.
PAGE 125
Attachments
1.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council nominate Cr Weragoda of the Eppalock Ward to fulfil the role of
independent Chairperson of the Lake Eppalock Land and On Water Management Plan
Implementation Group.
PAGE 126
5.4
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
The purpose of this report is to present the final draft of the City of Greater Bendigo
Reconciliation Plan 2016 - 2019 for Council consideration and endorsement following a
period of internal and public consultation.
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
3.7.4 Develop a City of Greater Bendigo Reconciliation Action Plan.
The development of a City of Greater Bendigo Reconciliation Action Plan also forms
recommendation 47 of the Independent Review 2014.
Policy Reference:
City of Greater Bendigos Human Rights Charter states Aboriginal persons hold distinct
cultural rights and must not be denied the right, with other members of the community:
a) to enjoy their identity and culture; and
b) to maintain and use their language; and
c)
d) to maintain their distinctive spiritual, material and economic relationships with the
land and waters and other resources with which they have a connection under
traditional laws and customs.
Background Information
A Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) is a three year action plan outlining what an
organisation will do within its spheres of influence to contribute towards reconciliation
between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) peoples and non-Indigenous
Australians.
PAGE 127
Reconciliation Australia manages the national RAP program and provides the following
definition of reconciliation:
Reconciliation is about unity and respect between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
peoples and non-Indigenous Australians. It is about respect for Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander heritage and valuing justice and equity for all Australians.
Whilst the City of Greater Bendigos RAP (the RAP) will be an organisational plan rather
than a broader community plan, due to the vast range of functions the City of Greater
Bendigo (the City) performs it is highly likely that the RAP outcomes will also generate
some benefits within the broader community.
At its meeting on 5 August 2015 Council considered the RAP Project Plan, including the
governance structure. The RAP Project Plan was shaped by best practice and the
minimum elements set out by Reconciliation Australia. Councillors Lisa Ruffell, Rod
Campbell and Barry Lyons were subsequently nominated as Councillor representatives
for the RAP Community Reference Group (CRG).
The CRG has been essential in providing a community interface and in representing the
interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Traditional Owners in the
RAP development process. It is considered that the CRG has in itself supported
reconciliation: that is, relationships have been strengthened and the staff involved now
have an increased level of cultural understanding.
The CRG reviewed and provided endorsement for the final draft of the RAP on 9 June.
Report
During the draft RAPs consultation period, Reconciliation Australia introduced new
requirements to standardise RAPs across different organisations and strengthen their
approval process. As a result the following changes to the draft RAP have been
requested by Reconciliation Australia:
- Including a City reconciliation vision statement.
- Removing details regarding objectives, measureable targets and partners.
- Simplifying the action details.
- Limiting information regarding local Aboriginal history as opposed to Councils
requests to elaborate more on the local history and culture of the Traditional
Owners.
- Two additional processes of review by Reconciliation Australia prior to
Reconciliation Australia endorsement.
PAGE 128
The original intention was to have the RAP endorsed by Reconciliation Australia in
readiness for a public launch at the NAIDOC Flag Raising event on 4 July. Due to the
additional work now required to achieve Reconciliation Australia endorsement this is no
longer possible.
The rationale for Reconciliation Australias changes relate to public accessibility and
understanding of RAPs. Whilst Reconciliation Australias new requirements stand to
improve the documents presentation and make it easier to read, they will also reduce
the level of guiding information for Responsible Managers within the current version.
Due to this a decision has been taken to produce a Reconciliation Plan (the Plan), which
will be an internally focused and more detailed version based on the work undertaken to
date. With a pictorial, externally focused version also prepared, which will be known as
the RAP and meet Reconciliation Australias requirements. Both versions will contain the
same actions and be publically available. The Reconciliation Plan is attached to this
report (Attachment 2) and it is intended that this version be publicly launched at the
NAIDOC Flag Raising event on 4 July. It is hoped Reconciliation Australia endorsement
of the RAP will be achieved by the end of August.
The consultation period focused on engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander residents and the Citys officers. Mainstreaming reconciliation by embedding
it into staff culture as well as organisational strategies, action plans, policies and
procedures is critical to reconciliation success. Consultation with staff therefore was used
as an opportunity to provide feedback about the results of the Staff Reconciliation Survey
and Organisational Audit that was undertaken and to discuss possible actions that could
contribute to reconciliation.
The Plan was publically available and promoted to the broader community for feedback.
The following is a summary of the structured promotion and consultation undertaken:
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community:
- Consultation with the Bendigo Local Aboriginal Network
- Consultation with Bendigo NAIDOC Committee
- Consultation with staff at Bendigo District Aboriginal Cooperation
- Consultation with the Local Aboriginal Justice Advisory Committee
- Radio: Phoenix FM Koori Shoutout
General community:
- Listening post at Heathcote Bush Market
- Listening post at Bendigo Farmers Market
- Listening post at Bendigo Library
- Discussion at the Bendigo Reconciliation Committee, and promotion at the
Bendigo Reconciliation Forum.
- Listening post at Ulumbarra: gather together show.
- Promotion on the City of Greater Bendigo website
- Presentation to the Department of Education and Training
- Radio: ABC Central Victoria, 3BO, Star FM
City:
-
PAGE 129
Information distributed to staff via intranet, emails, CEOs Bulletin and at the
Corporate Briefing
Feedback received from officers and the broader community was generally very positive.
Officers from across all Units demonstrated strong interest in learning more about local
Aboriginal culture. Largely the sentiment from the broader community was that it is great
that the City is taking steps to increase awareness and recognition of local Aboriginal
culture. A minority of community members questioned the value of a Plan and were not
supportive of the investment. Overall, staff and the broader community indicated strong
support for the proposed actions outlined with the draft Plan and also proposed
additional actions.
Please see the Consultation Summary (Attachment 1) for further details of who was
consulted, what feedback was received and how the feedback has been incorporated
into the final draft of the Plan.
Reconciliation Australia
Reconciliation Australia provides support to organisations developing RAPs and also
formally endorses RAPs. Endorsement enables RAPs to be nationally recognised and
included in collective impact evaluations. Reconciliation Australia has established four
different categories of RAPs depending on the organisational context and capacity of the
organisation. These range from introductory RAPs for organisations that have very
limited experience with reconciliation, to very sophisticated RAPs that contain ambitious
actions that have evolved from previous RAP achievements.
The draft Plan was forwarded to Reconciliation Australia for feedback. Due to this being
the Citys first experience in developing a RAP it was anticipated Reconciliation Australia
would classify it as sitting in the first (introductory) category. However, due to the
proposed accountability and timeframes outlined in the draft City RAP, Reconciliation
Australia has classified it as sitting in the third (innovation) category.
As mentioned above Reconciliation Australia also recommended a number of changes to
the Plan in order for it to meet the requirements for an endorsed RAP. These changes
will be implemented and it is hoped endorsement for a RAP will be able to be achieved
prior to the end of August 2016.
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
PAGE 131
Consultation/Communication
External Consultation:
Direct consultation was undertaken with approximately 330 community members
however it is estimated that thousands more received information about the opportunity
to provide comment via email networks and radio segments. The City received 12 written
submissions, two of which were unsupportive.
Attempts were made to do a face to face presentation about the Plan to Traditional
Owners via the Registered Aboriginal Party Board meetings, however the timing of
meeting cycles unfortunately proved a barrier to this.
Internal Consultation:
Approximately 230 staff participated in consultations on the draft Plan. This was
undertaken at staff meetings and included the following Directorates and Units:
Organisational Support, Parks and Natural Reserves, Active and Healthy Communities,
Capital Venues and Events, Tourism, Community Services, Engineering, Parking and
Animal Control and Community Partnerships.
Resource Implications
The majority of the proposed actions in the Plan are able to be undertaken within existing
resources. A small number will need to be considered as budget bids or require external
resourcing through successful grant application. The Community Partnerships Unit will
resource the ongoing governance requirements and the development of the staff toolkit.
Conclusion
The City of Greater Bendigo is committed to reconciliation. The adoption and
implementation of the Reconciliation Plan will assist in advancing reconciliation internally
and also position the City well to assume a greater leadership role in advancing
reconciliation throughout the municipality. This will be further strengthened, hopefully
later this year, with the endorsement of the Reconciliation Action Plan by Reconciliation
Australia.
The final draft of the City of Greater Bendigo Reconciliation Plan has been informed by
extensive internal and external consultation processes, including critical input from
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Traditional Owners. It includes 91
proposed actions, most of which will be able to be resourced within existing resourcing
as they focus on enhancements to established systems and practices. A minority of the
91 proposed actions will require some additional resources. These will need to be
considered in the context of annual budget development processes or external grant
funding opportunities.
PAGE 132
PAGE 133
Sustainability
6.
SUSTAINABILITY
6.1
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
The purpose of this report is to consider tenders submitted for the collection of household
organic waste from properties in urban Bendigo and Marong under Contract CT000269.
Policy Context
Council Plan Reference:
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013-2017 (2015-2016 Update):
Theme: 5
Sustainability
Strategy 5.5
Strategy Reference:
The Waste and Resource Management Strategy 2014 - 2019, Section 8.3 of the
implementation plan states that a key objective is to focus on diverting organic waste
from landfill to minimise current and future financial and environmental liabilities.
Background Information
On 2 March 2016 Council resolved to introduce in 2016/17 compulsory fortnightly
kerbside organic collection service to all households in urban areas of Bendigo and
Marong.
This contract is required to implement that resolution and compliments other contracts
already in place for the transport and processing of the organic material and the supply
of bins, kitchen caddies and bin liners.
PAGE 134
Sustainability
Report
A public tender for CT000269 was advertised on 16 April 2016 and closed on 10 May
2016. The tender was advertised in the Bendigo Advertiser and on Tenderlink. The
Tender Evaluation Panel (TEP) comprising Darren Fuzzard, Natasza Purser and Gary
Leech (Operations Engineer), evaluated the tenders in line with the evaluation criteria
contained within the tender.
In addition, a probity auditor (Graeme Stewart) attended the TEP meeting, which was
facilitated by Paul Sherwood (Contracts Co-ordinator) and attended by Richard Morrison
(Contract Project Co-ordination Manager). Bridgette McDougall (Organics Project
Officer) attended as an observer.
Priority/Importance:
The provision of a collection service to households in urban Bendigo and Marong is a
key aspect of the solution to divert organic waste from landfill. This contract represents
the last remaining element needed to enable the service to commence in September
2016 as agreed by Council.
The environmental benefits of diverting organic waste from landfill have been discussed
in previous reports to Council during the course of this project and are therefore not
detailed again here.
To date, the project has already achieved the following key milestones:
Trial of an organics collection service from 2,671 households and composting of the
collected material September 2015.
Tendering for supply of kitchen caddies and liners; ordering of caddies and liners
April 2016.
Ordering of 39,000 mobile organics bins for delivery to residents April 2016.
Negotiation and lock-in of delivery of bins, caddies and liners to residents April
2016.
PAGE 135
Sustainability
Consideration of Tenders:
Submissions were received from the following tenderers:
Ellwaste
Wheelie Waste
As requested by Council, tenderers were asked to provide prices for contracts of 2 and 7
years (with 2x2 year extension options) in length.
The price offered for a 7 year contract (plus 2x2 year extension options) by the preferred
tenderer within a conforming tender submission is $0.780/bin lift. Over 12 months,
collection from 40,000 properties will cost $811,200. The price offered by the preferred
tenderer for a 2 year contract (no extension) is $0.97/bin lift, or $1,008,800 per year for
40,000 properties.
The tendered prices to provide a service for 2 years in lieu of the industry standard of 7
years would be significantly higher. I.E. The tendered prices per lift for a 2 year contract
were an average of $1.261per lift, or $1,311,440 per year for 40,000 properties. The
average price of a 7 year contract was $0.87 per lift or $908,752 for 40,000 properties.
Hence, the average cost of a 2 year contract would be $402,688 more per year than the
average cost of a 7 year contract.
It is understood that Councils request to explore the price for a two year contract was
due to a desire to review the frequency of service provided once residents become more
comfortable with the three bin arrangement; notionally within two years of introducing the
organics bin.
Given the considerable cost penalty involved in pursuing a shorter duration contract, this
approach to achieve Councils objective is not recommended. Alternatively, should
Council consider that the community is ready for such a change prior to the end of the
standard (and proposed) seven year contract period, the frequency of pick up between
the waste bin (currently weekly) and the organics bin (fortnightly on introduction) could
readily be reversed with minimal, if any cost penalty.
An alternative tender submitted by JJ Richards also offered a different collection day
schedule to that which currently exists. The price tendered is marginally more expensive
than the conforming tender received from the recommended tenderer. To achieve this
arrangement would require either the organics bin to be collected out of sync with other
bins or that the existing collection services be changed to accommodate this. Given that
this alternative proposal has a higher cost than the recommended tender and requires
changes to existing services to household, further consideration of this alternative is not
considered warranted.
PAGE 136
Sustainability
The following assessment relates to the five conforming tenders received for the seven
year contract. The criteria used to assess the tenders included capability, capacity,
price/value, local content/partnership, and social procurement. A brief overview of the
submissions is given below.
Four Seasons Waste
Intend on purchasing 4 new Iveco trucks with Superior Pak bodies to service the
contract.
Provides garbage, recycling and green waste kerbside collection services along with
hard waste collections and transfer station management services.
EZY2C tracking system (the same as the system used by CoGB for its own waste
vehicles).
JJ Richards
Based in Queensland with 26 offices in Queensland the Northern Territory, NSW and
Victoria. Depot in Bendigo.
Intend on purchasing 4 new Iveco cab chassis with bodies manufactured in-house by
JJ Richards.
Provides garbage, recycling and green waste kerbside collection services along with
hard waste collections to Local Government.
PAGE 137
Sustainability
Based in Cohuna and has depots in Echuca, Swan Hill and Mildura.
Intend on purchasing 4 new Iveco trucks with MDJ Gen 5 bodies to service the
contract.
Provides garbage, recycling and green waste kerbside collection services along with
Transfer Station management, commercial waste services.
Own and operate the Patho landfill and the Echuca recycling facility.
Wheelie Waste
In business 35 years.
Trucks not specified, therefore ability to begin collections in September 2016 not
confirmed.
Greenaway Organics
Kendall contract with Shire of Moira (13,000 garbage per week, 13,000 recycling
per week and 8,000 organics per fortnight) has collected garbage and recycling for
18 years and organics for 18 months.
Sustainability
PAGE 139
Sustainability
6.2
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Director
Summary/Purpose
To seek approval to extend by 2 (two) years contract CN2386-2010/2011 Loading,
Carting & Disposal of Waste from Eaglehawk Landfill with Wheelie Waste Pty Ltd.
Policy Context
City of Greater Bendigo Council Plan 2013 2017 (2015 2016 update)
Strategy 5.5 The level of waste to landfill is reduced and residual waste is managed
responsibly, to deliver the adopted waste management targets.
Background Information
Contract CN2386-2010/2011 Loading, Carting & Disposal of Waste from Eaglehawk
Landfill commenced on the 1st October, 2011 with Wheelie Waste Pty Ltd.
The initial contract term is 5 (five) years with a 4 (four) year option 2 + 2 (two + two).
The initial Contract expiry date is 30th September, 2016.
Previous Council Decision(s) Date(s): 6 July 2011, decision to award contract.
Report
The contract required the contractor to load, cart and dispose of a minimum of 30,000
tonnes of waste in each year of the contract. Due to delays in the construction of Cell 5,
Council required additional waste over and above the 30,000 tonne minimum to be
transported.
It is proposed to reduce the quantity of waste transported from the landfill to 20,000
tonnes per annum. A reduction is expected due to the introduction of the organics waste
service which modelling showed should reduce the quantity of waste to the landfill by a
predicted 10,000 tonnes per annum.
PAGE 140
Sustainability
The contractor has agreed to this reduction and this alteration will not affect the contract
rate. Based on rates submitted when the short term contract was awarded by Council in
2014, the current contract rate is considered to be very competitive.
It is considered that the contractor has undertaken the work to a satisfactory standard.
A supplementary Section 89 report is included in the agenda for the information of
Councillors.
Consultation/Communication
All appropriate personnel in the Presentation & Assets Directorate have been consulted
during the evaluation process for a contract extension.
Conclusion
Wheelie Waste Pty Ltd has undertaken the work required under this contract to a
satisfactory standard. The company has the necessary capability and capacity to provide
this ongoing service and offers value for money.
Resource Implications
Funds have been included in the draft 2016/2017 Budget for this service.
Budget provision for this service is approximately $2,350,000 per annum (cartage and
landfill levy)
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
Delegates authority to the Chief Executive Officer to approve the second two year
contract extension subject to ongoing satisfactory performance of Wheelie Waste
during the first contract extension.
PAGE 141
7.
7.1
RECORD OF ASSEMBLIES
Document Information
Author
Responsible
Officer
Summary/Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide the record of any assembly of Councillors, which
has been held since the last Council Meeting, so that it can be recorded in the Minutes of
the formal Council Meeting.
Policy Context
Council demonstrates leadership in its decisions to meet future needs and challenges.
Background Information
The Local Government Act provides a definition of an assembly of Councillors where
conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
A meeting will be an assembly of Councillors if it considers matters that are likely to be
the subject of a Council decision, or, the exercise of a Council delegation and the
meeting is:
1.
2.
A planned or scheduled meeting that includes at least half the Councillors (5) and a
member of Council staff; or
an advisory committee of the Council where one or more Councillors are present.
The requirement for reporting provides increased transparency and the opportunity for
Councillors to check the record, particularly the declarations of conflict of interest.
Report
Meeting
Name/Type
Meeting Date
Matters discussed
Meeting Information
Audit Committee
19 May 2016
1. Local Government Service Delivery: Recreational
Facilities Audit Report
2. LGPRF report December 2015
PAGE 142
3.
4.
5.
Meeting
Name/Type
Meeting Date
Matters discussed
Councillor/officer left
meeting
Meeting Information
Consultation meeting
26 April 2016
Planning application DSD/66/2016
17 Bakewell Street, NORTH BENDIGO 3550
Subdivide land into 6 lots and construct 6 dwellings (2 single
storey; 4 double storey)
Attendees/Apologies
Councillors
Cr James Williams
Apology - Cr Lisa Ruffell
Staff/
Shannon Rosewarne
Community
Applicant
PAGE 143
Representatives
Objectors
Meeting
Name/Type
Meeting Date
Matters discussed
Councillor/officer left
meeting
Meeting Information
Consultation meeting
26 May 2016
Planning application DSD/66/2016
17 Bakewell Street, NORTH BENDIGO 3550
Subdivide land into 6 lots and construct 6 dwellings (2 single
storey; 4 double storey)
Attendees/Apologies
Councillors
Cr Peter Cox
Apology - Cr Lisa Ruffell
Staff/
Shannon Rosewarne
Community
Applicant
Representatives
Objectors
Meeting
Name/Type
Meeting Date
Matters discussed
Councillor/officer left
meeting
Meeting Information
Meeting of Councillors
7 June 2016
Hearing of Submissions relating to the Council Plan 2016/17
and Budget 2016/17
Attendees/Apologies
Councillors
Cr Rod Fyffe
Cr Rod Campbell
Cr Elise Chapman
Cr Peter Cox
Cr Helen Leach
Cr Barry Lyons
Cr Lisa Ruffell
Cr Mark Weragoda
Cr James Williams
Staff/
Mr Craig Niemann, Chief Executive Officer
Community
Ms Kerryn Ellis, Director Organisation Support
Representatives
Ms Prue Mansfield, Director Planning and Development
Mr Darren Fuzzard, Director Presentation and Assets
PAGE 144
Councillor/officer left
meeting
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the record of assemblies of Councillors as outlined in this report.
PAGE 145
7.2
Document Information
Author
Summary/Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide information on contracts recently awarded under
delegation.
Policy Context
Delivery of programs, projects and services that respond to community needs.
Report
Contract No
Project
Successful Contractor
Value
(GST Excl)
Delegated
Officer
Date Signed
Capital Contracts
CT000259
266,795.35
Darren Fuzzard
23 May 2016
CT000258
313,509.60
Darren Fuzzard
23 May 2016
CT000231
247,805.00
Pauline Gordon
04 May 2016
RECOMMENDATION
That the contracts awarded under delegation, as outlined in this report, be acknowledged
by Council.
PAGE 146
8.
NOTICES OF MOTION
8.1
Cr Cox
Cr Williams
That the resolution made at the Ordinary Council Meeting of 15 June, 2016, and
recorded in the Minutes on pages 23-29, as outlined below be rescinded.
Pursuant to section 61 of the Planning and Environment Act (1987), Greater Bendigo
City Council resolve to issue a Notice of Decision to Grant a Permit for a 34 lot
subdivision, removal of native vegetation, variation of easements and alteration of
access to a road in a Road Zone Category 1at 316-318 High Street, KANGAROO FLAT
subject to the following conditions:
1.
PLANS TO BE ENDORSED
The plans to be endorsed and which will then form part of the permit are the
plans submitted with the application.
2.
LAYOUT PLANS
The subdivision, as shown on the endorsed plans, must not be altered without
the prior written consent of the responsible authority.
3.
PROVISION OF SERVICES
The owner of the land must enter into agreements with the relevant authorities
for the provision of water supply, drainage, sewerage facilities, electricity and
gas services to each lot shown on the endorsed plan in accordance with the
authorities requirements and relevant legislation at the time.
4.
EASEMENTS
All existing and proposed easements and sites for existing and required utility
services and roads must be set aside in favour of the relevant authority for
which the easement or site is to be created on the plan of subdivision
submitted for certification under the Subdivision Act 1988.
5.
REFERRAL OF PLAN
The plan of subdivision submitted for certification under the Subdivision Act
1988 must be referred to the relevant authority in accordance with section 8 of
that Act.
6.
PAGE 147
7.
STAGED SUBDIVISION
The subdivision must proceed in the order of stages as shown on the endorsed
plan unless otherwise agreed in writing by the responsible authority.
8.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Before a statement of compliance is issued for each stage of the subdivision a
landscape plan to the satisfaction of the responsible authority must be
submitted to and approved by the responsible authority for the relevant stage.
When approved, the plan will be endorsed and then form part of the permit.
9.
COMPLETION OF LANDSCAPING
Before a statement of compliance is issued for each stage of the subdivision
the landscaping works shown on the endorsed must be carried out and
completed for that stage to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
10.
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
The landscaping works shown on the endorsed plans must be maintained to
the satisfaction of the responsible authority for 12 months after the works are
completed, including that any dead, diseased or damaged plants are to be
replaced.
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
11.
DETAILED DRAINAGE
Before the plan of subdivision is certified under the Subdivision Act 1988, plans
to the satisfaction of the responsible authority must be submitted to and
approved by the responsible authority. When approved, the plans will be
endorsed and then will form part of the permit. The plans must be drawn to
scale with dimensions. The plans must include:
(a) Direction of stormwater run off.
(b) A point of discharge for each lot.
(c) Independent drainage for each lot.
(d) Stormwater detention: allowable discharge
Q5 =
165 l/s
Q100 = 420 l/s
NB These rates include the existing dwellings at 320-340 High Street,
Kangaroo Flat
(e) Stormwater quality
(f) Easements as required.
12.
DRAINAGE WORKS
Prior to the issue of the statement of compliance for the subdivision, drainage
works must be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the
responsible authority.
13.
CONSTRUCTION OF WORKS
Road works, drainage and other civil works must be constructed in accordance
with the City of Greater Bendigo Infrastructure Design Manual and plans and
specifications approved by the responsible authority and must include:
(a) Fully sealed pavement with kerb and channel
(b) Drainage
(c) Footpaths and/or shared pedestrian/bicycle paths (if required)
PAGE 148
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
14.
PUBLIC ASSETS
Before the development starts, the owner or developer must submit to the
responsible authority a written report and photos of any prior damage to public
infrastructure. Listed in the report must be the condition of kerb and channel,
footpath, seal, street lights, signs and other public infrastructure fronting the
property and abutting at least two properties either side of the development.
Unless identified with the written report, any damage to infrastructure post
construction will be attributed to the development. The owner or developer of
the subject land must pay for any damage caused to any public infrastructure
caused as a result of the development or use permitted by this permit.
15.
16.
17.
PAGE 149
(b) All Coliban Water assets within the subdivision, both existing and
proposed, are to be protected by an easement in favour of Coliban Region
Water Corporation.
18.
POWERCOR
(a) The plan of subdivision submitted for certification under the Subdivision Act
1988 shall be referred to Powercor Australia Ltd in accordance with section
8 of that Act.
(b) The applicant shall: Provide an electricity supply to all lots in the
subdivision in accordance with Powercors requirements and standards,
including the extension, augmentation or re-arrangement of any existing
electricity supply system, as required by Powercor (A payment to cover the
cost of such work will be required). In the event that a supply is not
provided the applicant shall provide a written undertaking to Powercor
Australia Ltd that prospective purchasers will be so informed.
(c) The applicant shall: Where buildings or other installations exist on the land
to be subdivided and are connected to the electricity supply, they shall be
brought into compliance with the Service and Installation Rules issued by
the Victorian Electricity Supply Industry. The applicant shall arrange
compliance through a Registered Electrical Contractor.
(d) The applicant shall: Set aside on the plan of subdivision for the use of
Powercor Australia Ltd reserves and/or easements, and/or leases,
satisfactory to Powercor Australia Ltd where any electric substation (other
than a pole mounted type) is required to service the subdivision.
(e) The applicant shall: Provide easements satisfactory to Powercor Australia
Ltd, where easements have not been otherwise provided, for all existing
Powercor Australia Ltd electric lines on the land and for any new
powerlines required to service the lots and adjoining land, save for lines
located, or to be located, on public roads set out on the plan. These
easements shall show on the plan an easement(s) in favour of "Powercor
Australia Ltd" for Powerline Purposes pursuant to section 88 of the
Electricity Industry Act 2000.
(f) The applicant shall: Obtain for the use of Powercor Australia Ltd any other
easement external to the subdivision required to service the lots.
(g) The applicant shall: Adjust the position of any existing easement(s) for
powerlines to accord with the position of the line(s) as determined by
survey.
(h) The applicant shall: Obtain Powercor Australia Ltds approval for lot
boundaries within any area affected by an easement for a powerline and
for the construction of any works in such an area.
(i) The applicant shall: Provide to Powercor Australia Ltd, a copy of the
version of the plan of subdivision submitted for certification, which shows
any amendments which have been required.
(j) Any buildings must comply with the clearances required by the Electricity
Safety (Network Assets) Regulations.
(k) Any construction work must comply with the Officer of the Chief Electrical
Inspector No Go Zone rules.
PAGE 150
19.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(a) The owner of the land must enter into an agreement with:
A telecommunications network or service provider for the provision of
telecommunication services to each lot shown on the endorsed plan in
accordance with the providers requirements and relevant legislation at
the time; and
A suitably qualified person for the provision of fibre ready
telecommunication facilities to each lot shown on the endorsed plan in
accordance with any industry specifications or any standards set by the
Australian Communications and Media Authority, unless the applicant
can demonstrate that the land is in an area where the National
Broadband Network will not be provided by optical fibre.
(b) Before the issue of a Statement of Compliance for any stage of the
subdivision under the Subdivision Act 1988, the owner of the land must
provide written confirmation from:
A telecommunications network or service provider that all lots are
connected to or are ready for connection to telecommunications
services in accordance with the providers requirements and relevant
legislation at the time; and
A suitably qualified person that fibre ready telecommunication facilities
have been provided in accordance with any industry specifications or
any standards set by the Australian Communications and Media
Authority, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the land is in an
area where the National Broadband Network will not be provided by
optical fibre.
20.
21.
PAGE 151
Offset evidence
(c) Before any native vegetation is removed, evidence that an offset has been
secured must be provided to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
This offset must meet the offset requirements set out in this permit and be
in accordance with the requirements of the Permitted clearing of native
vegetation Biodiversity assessment guidelines and the Native vegetation
gain scoring manual. Offset evidence can be either:
i. a credit register extract from the Native Vegetation Credit Register; or
ii. a security agreement, to the required standard, for the offset site or
sites, including a 10 year offset management plan to the satisfaction of
the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning and
approved by the Responsible Authority. Every year, for ten years, after
the responsible authority has approved the offset management plan,
the applicant must provide notification of the management actions
undertaken towards implementing the offset management plan, to the
department. An offset site condition statement, including photographs
must be included in this notification.
22.
NOTE:
To assist applicants meet permit condition requirements, Meeting permit conditions
third party offsets Fact sheet (DEPI 2013) and First party general offset kit (DEPI 2013)
are available, Please visit www.depi.vic.gov.au/nativevegetation for further information
PAGE 152
The precedence that is set with this decision means that it is unlikely that all future
decisions on the retention of native vegetation and wetlands in Greater Bendigo's Urban
Growth Boundary will not be seriously considered.
That time is required to gain further expert advice on the value of the natural vegetation
and the range of wildlife that exists on this site.
Officer Comment
The Biodiversity and Ecological Assessment reports for the application accord with the
practice material for native vegetation assessments, and have been prepared by a highly
qualified and experienced local consultant.
The reports were reviewed by the Department of Environment, Land, Water and
Planning who had no objection, and found the reports to be satisfactory. The site is not
affected by any environmental overlays (which include Vegetation Protection Overlay,
Environmental Significance Overlay and Significant Landscape Overlay).
It is not the role of planning to consider every possible option to develop the site. There
are an infinite number of options that could be pursued, one is the protection of
vegetation. The application must be considered on its merits and Council officers must
consider what it before them. The site is not within a heritage overlay or a heritage study.
Whether the proposal will set a bad precedent is a matter of judgement. The land is
zoned for urban development and the relevant policies have been considered. The
officers judgement is that the proposal will not set a bad precedent and represents an
appropriate planning outcome. Further, the site has not been identified as a wetland.
The forum is the appropriate mechanism for Councillors to ask for more information. No
Councillors requested a copy of the biodiversity and ecological assessment at the forum,
or indeed any other information about the vegetation on the site. As noted above, the
reports have already been subject to review by the planning officer & DELWP, and do
not warrant further analysis.
These reports were part of the submitted application and available to councillors and the
general public. Councillor Cox requested a copy prior to the Council Forum and it was
provided to him. A report of this nature is not normally listed as an attachment, which is
the same for a Rescode report prepared by an applicant, for example.
Council undertook a Planning Scheme Amendment to implement the Urban Vegetation
Study in 2010, to protect urban vegetation at various sites within Bendigo. No changes to
the planning controls were made to this site as part of that Amendment.
PAGE 153
Should the rescission motion be supported, Council then needs to make a decision to
refuse the application as follows:
MOTION
Pursuant to section 61 of the Planning and Environment Act (1987), Greater Bendigo
City Council resolve to refuse to grant a permit for a 34 lot subdivision, removal of native
vegetation, variation of easements and alteration of access to a road in a Road Zone
Category 1at 316-318 High Street, Kangaroo Flat on the following grounds:
a. The density of the development and the loss of all vegetation from the site is not
consistent with the intent of the Kangaroo Flat South Regional Centre Structure Plan.
b. The proposal fails to protect significant vegetation on the site which has heritage
significance.
PAGE 154
9.
URGENT BUSINESS
10.
COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
11.
MAYOR'S REPORT
12.
13.
Nil.
PAGE 155
APPENDIX / ATTACHMENTS
PAGE 156