Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Submitted By;
Vineet Kumar Sarawagi
PGDM, BM-08223
Submitted To:-
Industry Mentor:
Mr. A. K. Agarwal (Executive Director-Projects)
Power Finance Corporation Limited
College Mentor:
Dr. Simmi Agarwal
(Faculty-Finance)
IMS, Ghaziabad
INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES,
C-238, BULANDSHAHR ROAD,
LAL QUAN, PB-57,
GHAZIABAD - 201 009.
TO WHOM SO EVER IT MAY CONCERN
This is to certify that Vineet Kumar Sarawagi, student of PGDBM (Full Time) 2008-
2010 batch, IMS Ghaziabad, have executed live project under my supervision and
guidance on the topic of “PROJECT APPRAISAL OF POWER PROJECT: A CASE
OF PRIVATE SECTOR UTILITY”
During the project execution he was found to be very sincere and attentive to small details,
which were discussed with him.
FACULTY GUIDE
I, Vineet Kumar Sarawagi, a student of PGDM (BM-08223), hereby declare that the live project topic
entitled “PROJECT APPRAISAL OF POWER PROJECT A CASE OF PRIVATE
SECTOR UTILITY”, is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the two years full
time P.G.D.M. course from IMS Ghaziabad is my original work. All the information and data provided in
this report are from some primary & secondary sources along with some calculations made and are true to
the best of my knowledge. But to maintain the confidentiality of the work the name of the entity has been
changed. References are quoted and due credit are given to the sources. This report has not been
submitted earlier either to this University/Institution or to any other University/Institution for any
purpose.
PGDM, BM – 08223
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Any assignment puts to litmus test of an individual knowledge credibility or experience and thus sole
efforts of an individual are not sufficient to accomplish the desire successful completion of a project
involve interest and effort of many people and so this becomes obligatory on the part to record our thanks
to those who helped us out in the successful completion of our project.
At this level of understanding it is often difficult to comprehend and assimilate a wide spectrum of
knowledge without proper guidance and advice. Hence, I would like to take this opportunity to express
my heartfelt Gratitude to Mr. A.K. Agarwal, Executive Director (Projects, PFC), without whose support
and constant guidance this project would not have been possible. I also express our deepest thanks to Mr.
Y. Venugopal, Manager (CMD Secretariat, PFC), whose unstinted Support, Noble Guidance and
Encouragement, which made this project successful. I would like to show my great gratitude to Dr.
Simmi Agarwal (Faculty-Finance), for her great guidance without which this project was not possible. I
would like to show my great gratitude to Prof. Timira Shukla (Chairperson-PGDM), for her great
guidance without which this project was not possible. Above all I will like to thanks to the Director Sir of
my college Dr. R. K. Bhardwaj, who allowed me to have this opportunity to have such a nice
experience.
I would also like to express my thanks to all other working team members of Power Finance Corporation,
whose help has made this project successful.
PGDM, BM-08223
IMS,Ghaziabad
.
Abstract: Power sector is growing at war level and needs proper nourishment through funding and
relaxation of rules and regulations. Indian government, being a welfare government has always been
promoting the Industrialization of the country. There are many organizations, where government has
shown its important role towards achieving its purpose. PFC (A Navratna PSU) has been one among
them, promoted by government, which help power projects through funding as well as through many
other clearencess. This has lead to increase in power projects in the country and has also decreased red
tappism. Before funding any project, every organization has to go through appraisal route, where different
areas are covered to analyze the feasibility of the project. CERC has given proper rules and guidelines
concerning the loan appraisal for any type of project PFC has its own OPS and other policies, being
followed by it for project appraisal. One such example of Abc Power has been considered here and the
project appraisal process by PFC is explained, trying to cover its all aspects.
Key Words: PFC, CERC, Project Appraisal, Project Financing, Xyz Power
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Power Industry Structure & Development ……………….…………………….. 1-3
Chapter 7. Appendices
Appendix 1: Abbreviations
Appendix 2: Calculation of IDC and Project completion cost
Appendix 3: Sensitivity Analysis
Appendix 4: Tariff Calculations
Appendix 5: Projected Cash Flow Statement
Appendix 6: Projected Balance Sheet
The targeted capacity addition for 2008-09 was 11061 MW, however the actual addition is 3454 MW
with thermal, hydro and nuclear accounting for 2485 MW, 969 MW and nil respectively.
A generation capacity of 21180 MW was added during the X plan period. The availability of power has
increased but demand has consistently outstripped supply and the power sector is characterized by
substantial peak & energy shortage. The country faced energy shortage of about 9.6% and the peak
shortage of 13.8% at the end of X plan. Coupled with this is the urban-rural dichotomy in supply. In
accordance with Census 2001, only about 56% of households have access to electricity, with the rural
access being 44% and urban access of about 82%. In case of those, who do have electricity, reliability and
quality are matters of great concern.
To mitigate the shortages, the Govt. of India has set a goal- „Mission 2012: power for all‟. The blueprint
for Power Sector development revolves around the following:
Access to electricity to be available for all households by 2012.
Availability of power on demand to be fully met by 2012.
Energy shortage and peaking shortage to be overcome by providing adequate spinning reserves.
Reliable and quality power to be supplied in efficient manner.
Electricity Sector to achieve financial turnaround and commercial viability.
Consumers interests to be accorded top priority.
An integrated power transmission grid helps to even out supply-demand mismatches. The existing Inter-
regional transmission capacity of about 20750 MW connects northern, western, eastern and north-eastern
regions in a synchronous mode operating at the same frequency and the southern region asynchronously.
This has enabled interregional energy exchanges of about 46,000 million units (2008-09), thus
contributing to greater utilization of generation capacity and an improved power supply position.
Proposals are underway to have synchronous integration of southern region with the rest. According to XI
plan 293372 CKM of transmission lines are planned to be added during the XI plan. Distribution is the
key segment of electricity supply change. The biggest challenge of the power sector is the high Aggregate
Technical and Commercial Losses (AT&C losses). The AT&C losses are in the range of 18% to 62% in
various states. The average AT&C losses in the country are at 34%. The Ministry of Power, Govt. of
India has launched the Restructured Accelerated Power Development and Reform Program (RAPDRP) in
July 2008 with focus on establishment of base line data and fixation of accountability, and reduction of
AT&C losses through strengthening and up-gradation of subtransmission and distribution network and
adoption of information technology during XI plan.
The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) has issued new Inter-state Trading Regulations
in February 2009 with an aim to tighten the terms and conditions for grant of trading licence keeping in
view the current price of the trading power and the liquidity requirements of the power trading business
and to encourage only the serious players. The Traders are categorized on the basis of volume of
electricity to be traded and the net worth of the trader. Further, CERC has issued guidelines for setting up
power exchange. It has also given approval to two (2) applications for setting up power exchange. The
two power exchanges, viz. the Indian Energy Exchange Ltd (IEX)., New Delhi and the Power Exchange
India Ltd (PXIL), Mumbai have already started their operations from 27th June, 2008 and 22nd October,
2008 respectively. Power trading would help in resource optimization by facilitating the disposal of
surplus power with distribution utilities and in meeting the short-term peak demand.
Even though per capita consumption of electricity in India has grown from 15 kWh/Year in 1950 to 704
kWh/Year in fiscal 2007-08 and according to data from the Ministry of Power, Govt. of India per capita
consumption of energy in India is projected to increase to about 1,000 kWh/Year by 2012, the per capita
consumption in India is extremely low in comparison to the rest of the world due to unreliable supply and
inadequate distribution networks. The power scenario in India offers a huge opportunities as well as
challenges. For the XI five year plan a total of Rs.10,59,515 crore will be required to fund all generation,
transmission, renovation and modernization and distribution projects. According to estimates,
Rs.4,24,259 crore will be available as debt and Rs.2,13,614 crore as equity from the financial industry
inclusive of PFC. The opportunity for investments exists in power equipment manufacturing, wind and
solar power, coal mining, natural gas, LNG and gas pipelines and carbon trading and CDM projects.
Projects Commissioned
The important projects of State & Central sector which were supported by PFC and commissioned during
the current financial year are Amarkantak TPS of MPPGCL in Madhya Pradesh, Valathur Combined
Cycle Power Project Phase-II (92.2 MW) of TNEB in Tamil Nadu and Sadardighi TPS Unit –II (300
MW) of WBPDCL in West Bengal.
Projects Commissioned
The important projects which were supported by PFC and commissioned during the current financial year
are Baglihar HEP (3x150 MW) of JKPDCL in Jammu and Kashmir, Priyadarshni Jurala HEP (6x39 MW)
of APPGCL in Andhra Pradesh and Varahi HEP (2x115 MW) of KPCL in Karnataka.
RENOVATION, MODERNISATION AND LIFE EXTENSION
THERMAL PROJECTS
During the year 2008-09, loans worth Rs.214 crore were sanctioned for R&M and life extension of
thermal power plants and an amount of Rs.510 crore was disbursed. Cumulatively, an amount of Rs.6,629
crore has been sanctioned and Rs.4,568 crore stands disbursed till 31st March, 2009.
HYDRO PROJECTS
During the year 2008-09, the Company sanctioned Rs.48 crore for R&M of hydro power projects and
Rs.51 crore was disbursed. Cumulatively, an amount of Rs.1,453 crore has been sanctioned and Rs.884
crore stands disbursed till 31st March, 2009.
CREDIT RATINGS
DOMESTIC: During the financial year 2008-09, The Company‟s long term domestic borrowing
programme (including bank loans) was awarded the highest rating of „AAA‟ and „LAAA‟ by CRISIL and
ICRA respectively. The Company‟s short term domestic borrowing programme (including bank loans)
was awarded the highest rating of „P1+‟ and „A1+‟ by CRISIL & ICRA respectively.
INTERNATIONAL: During the financial year 2008-09, the international credit rating agencies Moody‟s,
Fitch and Standard & Poor‟s have given to the company, long term foreign currency issuer ratings of „
Baa3‟, „BBB- „ & „BBB-‟ respectively, which are at par with sovereign rating for India.
BORROWINGS
BORROWINGS FROM DOMESTIC MARKET
The Company mobilized funds amounting to Rs.21,482.59 crore from the domestic market during 2008-
09 as against Rs.15,972.34 crore during 2007-08. Out of the above, Rs.12,808.90 crore was raised by
issue of unsecured taxable bonds in the nature of debentures, Rs.5,350.00 crore by way of long / medium
term loans from Banks/FIs, Rs.1,260.00 crore by way of short term loans from Banks/FIs and
Rs.2,063.69 crore by way of issue of Commercial Paper.
EXTERNAL BORROWINGS
Due to tight financial conditions in international credit markets, The company did not raise any External
Commercial Borrowing (ECB) during the financial year 2008-09. However, US$1.22 million was drawn
by the Company from ADB, Manila by way of sanctioned line of credit.
CATEGORIZATION OF UTILITIES
The Company classifies State Power Utilities, its principal borrowers, into A+, A, B and C categories.
The categorization is based on the pre-determined parameters including operational & financial
performance of the utilities. The categorization enables PFC to determine credit exposure limits and
pricing of loans to the state power utilities. As on 31st March 2009, 88 nos. utilities were categorized, 10
as “A+”, 33 as “A”, 25 as “B” and 20 as “C”. PFC is also stipulating appropriate conditions relating to
implementation of reforms and improvement of performance while sanctioning financial assistance to its
borrowers based on their entity appraisal.
EQUITY FINANCING
Equity investment business is generally considered as a logical extension of debt business. The Company
is endeavoring to make a mark in the area of equity investment so as to capitulate on its vast domain
experience that it has attained during its over 20 years of operations in power sector debt financing. PFC
aims to leverage its financial strength, large debt providing capability and power sector expertise to invest
in equity of attractive power projects. Further, PFC also intends to enter equity syndication business so as
to expedite early financial closure of projects leading to faster capacity addition. This would help PFC to
enhance its fee-based income also. Over a period of time, The company proposes to build an equity
portfolio of power assets which could provide consistent gains in the form of dividend and/or capital
appreciation.
SUBSIDIARIES
As a nodal agency designated by Government of India for development of Ultra Mega Power projects,
PFC has so far incorporated eleven wholly owned subsidiaries out of which nine (9) were to facilitate the
development and construction of large capacity power projects based on international competitive bidding
and two (2) for the development of large transmission projects. On completion of the bidding process, so
far four (4) subsidiaries have already been transferred to the successful bidder for implementation of the
projects. In addition, the Company had also incorporated on 25th March, 2008, PFC Consulting Limited, a
wholly owned subsidiary company to promote, organize and carry on consultancy services.
PFC CONSULTING LIMITED
Background
The Company has been providing Consultancy services to Power sector through its Consultancy Services
Group (CSG) since October 1999. With a reforming power sector, new entities being operationalised,
regulatory mechanism coming into operation and Electricity Act 2003 being implemented; leveraging the
experience of its CSG Unit, PFC incorporated PFC Consulting Limited (PFCCL) as a wholly owned
subsidiary of PFC on 25th March 2008 for providing consultancy services
to Power Sector. The company commenced its business on 25th April 2008.
While PFCCL continues to undertake various assignments, its focus is on assignments relating to:-
Procurement of Power Through „Case 1‟ and „Case 2‟ of Guidelines for Determination of Tariff
by Bidding Process for Procurement of Power by Distribution Licencees, issued by MoP, GoI.
Overall advisory services for development of a new Thermal Power Station.
Computerization of Accounting Systems for State Utilities.
Restructuring/ Implementation of reforms for State Utilities.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The company continued to accomplish a healthy growth during the Financial Year 2008-09. The total
revenues grew by 30.62% from Rs.5,040.04 crore in FY 2007-08 to Rs.6,583.54 crore in FY 2008-09.
Profit before Tax (PBT) grew by 11.34% from Rs.1,787.69 crore in F.Y.2007-08 to Rs.1,990.47 crore in
F.Y. 2008- 09. However, Profit before Tax grew by 24.07% without taking into account exchange losses
of Rs.252.53 crore booked during the current year as against Rs.20.14 crore booked during the previous
year. The increase in Exchange loss during the current year is due to significant depreciation in INR
against the foreign currencies. Profit after Tax (PAT) grew by 63.24% from Rs.1,206.76 crore in
F.Y.2007-08 to Rs.1,969.96 crore in F.Y. 2008- 09. (This includes increase in profit by Rs.483.24 crore
due to reversal of Deferred Tax Liability (DTL) pertaining to earlier year‟s on Special Reserve created
and maintained u/s 36(1)(viii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 consequent upon the receipt of a clarification
from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.)
Further, the net worth of the Company grew by 24.19% in 2008- 09 to Rs.10,790 crore as compared to
Rs.8,688 crore in 2007-08 and the Loan Assets (net) as at 31st March, 2009 grew by 24.94% to
Rs.64,428.99 crore from Rs.51,568.31 crore as at 31st March, 2008. Also, the Gross Non Performing
Assets (NPAs) as % of Loan Assets decreased to 0.02% in 2008-09 as against 0.03% in 2007-08.
Chapter 3: OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1) To understand the Policy Framework of Loan sanctioning of PFC
2) To understand the Policy Framework for Tariff Determination by CERC
3) To study a case of Loan appraisal by PFC for Power Project in India
1. Purpose
To provide finance to all types of projects in state & private sector viz. generation, transmission,
distribution, renovation & modernization, uprating, environment upgradation, metering, etc. The
infrastructure projects having forward and backward linkages with power projects are also covered.
2. Eligible entities
The entities engaged in generation, transmission, trading, distribution of power or any combination of
these activities including captive / co-gen power producers. The entities engaged in the infrastructure
projects with forward / backward linkages to power projects.
6. Moratorium
Moratorium on principal is available upto 6 months from the date of project commissioning / COD. There
is no moratorium on interest payment.
7. Disbursement mechanism
Disbursement will be made, against bills, as per the „Disbursement Schedule‟ submitted by the borrower.
In case of small loans (below Rs. 20 crs.), simplified disbursement procedure is applicable. In the case of
private sector borrower, disbursement is made through Trust and Retention Account mechanism.
8. Interest payment
Interest is to be paid quarterly, on standard due dates i.e. 15/4, 15/7, 15/10 and 15/1 every year.
9. Repayment
Repayment is to be made in maximum years of:
* All such loans shall also have put and call option after the end of 12 years (thermal & other schemes)
and 15 years for hydro schemes from the date of commissioning of project.
The first repayment installment will become due on the standard due date immediately following the end
of moratorium period. Borrower may also opt for a shorter repayment period.
10. Security requirements
�State / Central government or bank guarantee or charge on assets, for state and central sector entities,
while charge on project assets for others.
� Letter of Credit or Tripartite Escrow Agreement amongst the borrower, the bank and PFC for state and
central sector entities while Trust and Retention Account mechanism for others.
� Corporate and / or personal guarantee of the promoters for private sector, if the outcome of appraisal
establishes a requirement for the same.
�Other securities, as may be necessary.
2. Eligible entities
All the existing state / central sector borrowers (who have outstanding amounts under long term loans-
project finance) and who are not declared defaulter by PFC.
3. Extent of assistance
Rs.150 crores to Rs.300 crores depending upon reforming status of the borrowing entities as per policy
applicable.
4. Tenor
The loan under the scheme shall not exceed one year from the date of disbursement.
5. Interest rate & other charges
As notified by the Corporation from time to time.
6. Disbursement mechanism
� At the time of making request to PFC for release of tranche the borrower shall indicate the purpose for
which the amount is proposed to be used.
� The borrower shall furnish utilization certificate for the amount released within 60 days from the date
of disbursement.
� On the advice of the borrower, the Corporation may also make direct payment to the executing agency
under intimation to the borrower.
7. Repayment period
Option-I : Loan will be sanctioned for a tenor of 30 days to 180 days in multiples of 30 days with option
to roll over.
Option-II : Loan will be sanctioned for a tenor upto one year. Loan shall be repaid through EMI. First
EMI shall commence after two months.
Loan under each of these options may be drawn in maximum of three tranche, each tranche being at least
Rs.10 crores. A repayment schedule will be made out for each tranche.
8. Security
� Tripartite Escrow account agreement in the prescribed format where the sanctioned amount is upto
50% of sanction limit.
� Where sanctioned amount is more than 50% of sanction limit in addition to escrow account, charge on
assets / govt. guarantee will also be required.
9. Validity of loan
The entire loan amount shall be drawn within 45 days from the date of sanction.
GUARANTEE ASSISTANCE
A. DEFFERED PAYMENT GUARANTEE
PFC issue guarantees on behalf of projects to guarantee their payment obligations. Our guarantees enable
projects to secure financing from a wider spectrum of sources at more competitive rates, including
borrowings from commercial banks, foreign lenders and the debt capital markets.
1. Purpose
To provide non-fund based assistance by way of guarantees for performance of activities/contractual
obligations under agreements such as guarantee for performance under Fuel Supply Agreement for
facilitating procurement of raw material like gas, oil, coal or any other form of fuel.
2. Eligible entities
All power utility companies / entities (excluding state sector and municipal bodies).
3. Extent of exposure
Sanction of guarantee to a company / entity under this policy shall be within the maximum exposure as
per policy of the Corporation.
4. Period of guarantee
Upto the scheduled date of Commercial Operation Date.
6. Securities
Combination of following securities :
(i) State / Central Government Guarantee
(ii) Charge on assets
(iii) Corporate Guarantee
(iv) Personal Guarantee of Promoters
(v) Pledge of shares
(vi) Charge on Revenue
Any other security acceptable to PFC
The Borrower will furnish at the time of the submission of MOA to the Corporation a quarter-wise
schedule of drawl of this loan, the year being the financial year commencing April 1st and ending
March 31st, and the quarters being three months period beginning from 1st April, 1st July, 1st Oct.
and 1st Jan. of the year. The borrower will be required to draw the entire amount of committed
funds in the respective quarters. In case the borrower could not draw the committed funds in the
scheduled quarter, the Corporation will recover commitment charges on the undrawn amount of
previous quarter from the first day of following quarter till the date of actual date of drawl @ 0.25
% p.a. The commitment charges will be payable quarterly on 15th April, 15th July, 15th October
and 15th January every year after execution of loan documents till the date of drawl of loan by the
borrower.
The Commitment Charges will be payable quarterly on 15th April,15th July, 15th October and
15th January every year after execution of loan documents.
OR
*Upfront Fee
The Central/State Utilities/Municipal Bodies shall pay to PFC upfront fee of 0.1% of the loan
amount sanctioned on or before the execution of MOA.
Not applicable in the case of loans sanctioned upto Rs. 100 crores.
Upfront Fee for Infrastructure projects with backward/ forward linkage to power sector shall be 0.1% and
1.0% for State/ Central & Private Sector borrowers respectively. No option for commitment charges shall
be given
Private Power Utilities shall pay to PFC upfront fee of 1.0% of the loan amount sanctioned on or before
the execution of MOA.
Penal Interest
In the event of the interest or the principal not being paid to the Corporation by the Borrower on due date
as indicated in the foregoing clauses, the Borrower shall pay to the Corporation a penal rate of
interest of 2.0% per annum over and above the rate of interest mentioned above at which the loan
is sanctioned, which will be compounded on quarterly basis.
The penal interest charged from borrower shall be subject to the following rebate :
(a) In case the payment is received within one month of the date on which the repayments
became due, 50% of the penal interest due from the date of default till the date of receipt shall
be given as rebate.
(b) In case the payment is received within two months of the date on which the repayments
became due, 30% of the penal interest due from the date of default till the date of receipt shall
be allowed as rebate.
(c) In case the payment is received within three months of the date on which the repayments
became due, 10% of the penal interest due from the date of default till the date of receipt shall
be allowed as rebate.
(d) No rebate shall be given in penal interest in case of default of over three months.
In order to encourage timely payment of dues by the borrowers PFC may consider offering
incentive at the rate specified from time to time.
Premature payment of loans may be permitted on the terms agreed by the Corporation from time to time.
Risk Management:
On borrower side customers, since SEBs are Govt. controlled entities; they are excluded from the
purview of PFC‟s KYC structure. However, corporates, irrespective of its status, would be included.
Accordingly, in case of IPPs, the details of the borrower company, its Directors as well as promoter
entities would be obtained. Further, the individual details of Directors of the promoting companies would
also be included in the purview of PFC‟s KYC Guidelines.
PFC‟s investors are categorized, based on perceived risk, into three categories - A, B & C. Category A
customers include low risk, Category B contain marginal risk customers while Category C are high risk
customers. PFC‟s borrowings are mainly wholesale and in the form of loans from scheduled commercial
banks, FIs and bonds, which are subscribed by trusts, corporates, banks etc. Since scheduled commercial
banks and FIs are registered with statutory bodies like RBI, they may be exempt from PFC‟s KYC
structure (Category A customers). Similarly, Government departments & Government owned companies,
regulators and statutory bodies etc. and Central Board of Trustees may be categorised as Category A
customers.
Those entities, which are primary investors in our bonds (Category B & C customers), shall be included
in PFC‟s KYC structure. Further, for the purpose of risk categorization, individuals (other than High Net
Worth) and entities whose identities and sources of wealth can be easily identified and transactions in
whose accounts by and large conform to the known profile may be categorised as Category B customers.
Further, Category B customers shall include salaried employees whose salary structures are well-defined,
public trusts like provident fund trust, pension trusts etc. Likewise, Category C customers shall include
(a) non-resident customers, (b) high net worth individuals i.e. those investors who invest more than Rs. 1
Lac (c) private trusts, charities, NGOs and organizations receiving donations, (d) firms with 'sleeping
partners'.
Broad Guidelines for Submission of Disbursement Claims to PFC (Rupee Term
Complete the execution of loan documents. Ensure to comply with the following :-
a) Submit the details of procurement of materials, works and services in the format (Disbursement
Schedule) to the concerned
b) Submit the names and designations of officers who are authorised to submit the claims to PFC along
with attested specimen signatures.
c) Ensure the compliance of all pre-disbursement conditions as laid down under the terms and conditions
of loan.
d) Submit the quarterly drawal schedule for the entire loan amount.
e) Ensure to clear outstanding dues , if you has been declared a defaulter by PFC.
f) Create the security and other such requirements as per loan sanction terms and conditions..
g) Establish the Escrow account/Letter of credit etc. as per the sanction terms.
h) Ensure to Comply with all general and other special conditions, if any, as per the terms of sanction.
DISBURSEMENT BY PFC
i) When supplier /contractor / agency / consultant is a Government Company / any other Govt.
Departments / agencies.
•• Verify that equipment / materials or civil/erection work done/ services provided shown in the Bills/
Invoices are in conformity to the disbursement Schedule. PFC will not release the payment of material /
work / equipment services which is not in conformity with disbursement schedule.
•• Fill the required information in Form-I (Annexure-II) and get it signed by the authorized official along
with seal.
•• The Government supplier/contractor/agency will present the Form –I along with authenticated original
bills/invoices to PFC.
•• PFC will make the direct payment to such Company / Department / Agency on behalf of the Borrower.
ii) When supplier /contractor / agency / consultant is not a Government Company/ Departments / agencies
•• Verify that equipment / materials or civil/erection work done/ services provided shown in the Bills/
Invoices are in conformity to the disbursement Schedule. PFC will not release the payment of material /
work /equipment services which is not in conformity with disbursement schedule.
•• Fill the required information in Form-I (Annexure-II) and get it signed by the authorized official
alongwith seal.
•• Give to the supplier/contractor/agency the Bills/Invoices ( in original ) alongwith Form-I (duly filled &
signed by authorised signatory). Simultaneously, you also send an advance copy of the Form-I, without
any enclosures to PFC for information.
•• The supplier /contractor /Agency will present the duly passed bills/invoices and Form-I to the
designated bank of PFC through their bank. A list PFC‟s designated bank is enclosed at Annexure –IV.
•• The designated Bank of PFC will forward the Bills/Invoices alongwith Form-I (in original) to PFC.
•• PFC will advise the designated Bank for making the payment to Supplier/Contractor/Agency through
their bank.
• Reimbursement Claim
•• Claim will be admitted in respect of the equipment/materials or the civil/erection works, which
conform to the accepted disbursement schedule.
• Disbursement of Advance
•• An advance to the extent of 15% of the sanctioned amount can be considered by PFC, as per the
prevailing policy.
•• PFC will examine the request and compliance and after having satisfied , may release the advance.
•• Ensure to submit the utilization of advance in line with the terms & conditions of the Sanction Letter.
•• PFC may adjust the reimbursement claims of the borrower against the outstanding advance in loan .
General Points
•• Ensure to deposit all statutory deductions or make arrangement to deposit to the concerned authorities.
•• Ensure not to stipulate any condition either by you or supplier which may restrain the PFC‟s designated
bank to remit the payment.
•• Ensure the compliance of relevant laws and regulations while passing the bills and authenticating the
FORM-I/II.
•• Ensure that the supplier/ agency/ contractor are not barred to receive the payment under any
statute/law.
•• Ensure that the claimed invoices were raised on or after the cut off date of expenditure as specified in
the sanction terms & conditions.
•• If any specific disbursement procedure is indicated in letter of sanction, terms and conditions of any
loan, the same will be followed in respective loan.
Rejection/return of claim
•• A claim will be rejected if it is not in conformity with the accepted disbursement schedule or the
prescribed disbursement procedure.
•• Claims for the items not included in the disbursement schedule without submission / acceptance of
additional / revised schedules.
•• Direct payment claims of private/ contractors/ suppliers are not routed through banks.
Return on Equity.
(1) Return on equity shall be computed in rupee terms, on the equity base determined in accordance with
regulation 12.
(2) Return on equity shall be computed on pre-tax basis at the base rate of 15.5% to be grossed up as per
clause (3) of this regulation:
Provided that in case of projects commissioned on or after 1st April, 2009, an additional return of 0.5%
shall be allowed if such projects are completed within the timeline specified in
Provided further that the additional return of 0.5% shall not be admissible if the project is not completed
within the timeline specified above for reasons whatsoever.
(3) The rate of return on equity shall be computed by grossing up the base rate with the normal tax rate
for the year 2008-09 applicable to the concerned generating company or the transmission licensee, as the
case may be:
Provided that return on equity with respect to the actual tax rate applicable to the generating company or
the transmission licensee, as the case may be, in line with the provisions of the relevant Finance Acts of
the respective year during the tariff period shall be trued up separately for each year of the tariff period
along with the tariff petition filed for the next tariff period.
(4) Rate of return on equity shall be rounded off to three decimal points and be computed as per the
formula given below:
(i) Fuel cost for one month corresponding to the normative annual plant availability factor, duly taking
into account mode of operation of the generating station on gas fuel and liquid fuel;
(iii) Maintenance spares @ 30% of operation and maintenance expenses specified in regulation 19.
(iv) Receivables equivalent to two months of capacity charge and energy charge for sale of electricity
calculated on normative plant availability factor,
Depreciation shall be calculated annually based on Straight Line Method and at rates specified in
Appendix-III to these regulations for the assets of the generating station and transmission system:
4.3 PROJECT APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
1. TITLE
2. INTRODUCTION
Proposal of the borrower in brief covering the project, proposed plan for its execution and financing.
3. ENTITY DETAILS
3.1 Private Sector Company
3.1.1 Applicant Company:
Brief about the applicant company (private sector/joint venture), date of incorporation, reference to
MOA of the company with reference to object clause. Status of the company in terms of Electricity
(supply ) Act,1948/Indian Electricity Act, 1910. In case applicant company is an existing company,
detailed analysis of operational & financial performance and financial position. The analysis (3-5
years) to include the ratio analysis covering profitability, debt servicing, financial health aspects,
pattern of share holding (list of share holders holding more than 5%shares, also to be given). In case
loans have been obtained from the Financial Institutions (FI) in the past, special terms and conditions,
if any, imposing by the FIs having bearing on the management, operation, raising of funds, credit
worthiness.
In case applicant company is an existing power company, details assessment on critical areas such as
consumer profile, receivable, tariff fixation mechanism, cost-tariff analysis also to be given.
Details of the promoters, giving their business background and experience profile. Analysis of the
operational & financial performance and financial health of the group promoters and their group
companies, business growth, future plan. The analysis of performance (3-5 years) to include the ratio
analysis covering profitability, debt servicing, financial health aspects. Status of income tax
assessment and pending litigation, credit worthiness, giving credit references received from Bank,
position of default from FI, credit rating, if any, obtained in the past including current status of credit
rating, track record of the promoters in project implementation, pattern of share holding in promoter
company (list of share holders holding more than 5% shares, also to be given), promoter contributing
and its percentage to total project cost. Critical comments on the overall credibility, competence of the
promoters and the company.
3.1.3 Management
Composition of Board of Directors, background and experience of Directors, brief profile of key
executives.
Status of loan from PFC and from other sources, mentioned in two different headings.
4. PROJECT DETAILS
4.1.1 Project Purpose & Scope: The detailed purpose, capacity, system components, justification,
and feasibility of the project.
4.1.2 Location and Site: Location, Rail, Air & Road links, distances, limitations in transportation (if
any), availability of construction power and water sources.
4.1.3 Technology: Salient Technological features of the project i.e. type & design of equipments,
characteristics of fuel, water and other inputs such as wind velocity, solar radiation etc. and
their relevance in selecting systems, equipments and plants to be used. The alternatives
considered and the basis for selections made for the project. Technical collaborations,
consultants and origin of main plant and equipment.
4.1.4 EPC Contract: EPC contract, if any, items covered, details relating to EPC contractor and its
selection.
4.1.5 Status and Preparedness: Describe preparedness, status of investigations, preliminary and
detailed engineering, procurement etc. Also describe systems and process involved etc.
alongwith the status of infrastructure already developed.
4.1.6 Projects Inputs: Sources. And quantities of required project inputs in terms of water, fuel
linkage, land availability, port handling and transportation facility etc. as required for
successful and reliable operations. The areas of concern, if any, may be elaborated.
4.1.7 Project Infrastructure Development: The proposed infrastructure facilities such as approach
rail/road. Residential colonies, construction power & water, construction machinery and other
construction facilities.
4.1.8 Environment Management: How the key environment which form the conditionality of
environmental clearances for the project by MOE&F/CPCB and the state pollution control
board has to be dealt. Local matters and global environmental issues should also be covered.
4.1.9 Operations and Maintenance: Arrangements for operations and maintenance including details
of O&M contractor, if any.
4.2 Clearances: List all the clearances/approvals required at Central/State levels as per GOI (Ministry
of Power) guideline for power along with their status and also the status of investment approvals.
4.3.1 Need and Justification: Critical comments based on demand-supply position, system
inadequacy, project inputs and linkages available, adaptability of the technology proposed to
be used etc.
4.3.2 Existing System: Explain and establish the boundaries of the existing system on which the
proposed project is to be interconnected for smooth operation.
4.3.3 Proposed Project: Define the main boundaries of the proposed project in relation to the
existing system.
4.3.4 Techno-economic Consideration: Man observations of statutory authorities, need for special
efforts and actions required with respect to generation, transmission and sale of electricity for
ensuring techno-economic viability of the proposed project need to be brought out.
4.3.5 Linkages: Linkages for evacuation of power, fuel supply or other forward and backward
linkages.
Describe in detail the procurement philoshpy and guidelines be adopted for procurement of main-
plant, auxiliary systems, construction works, erection & commissioning and other services for the
project. Define procurement packages being adopted, fixed or variable price contracts proposed,
incentive/penal provision and how their competitiveness is being ensured.
Review of borrowers projections and assessment of the realistic time frame for completition, taking
onto account the status of investigation, infrastructure, clearnces, procurement, financial tie-up, and
progress at site. Illustrate the implementation schedule with PERT/CPM networks etc.
If the project is already under implementation, the progress of major work areas viz-a-vis the schedule
to be indicated with likely dates of completion/commissioning.
4.6.1 Cost of he project and package-wise break up including EPC contracts, miscellaneous assets,
preoperative expenses, margin money etc. wherever applicable. Basis of cost estimates, prices
level and reasonability of cost estimate should also be dealt.
4.6.2 Contingencies provided for physical variation in estimates, price escalation in local and
foreign components and affect of foreign exchange variation should be covered.
4.6.3 Comparison of he cost of the project with similar recently appraised project, wherever
possible.
Describe the financial tie-up with upto date position. Bring-out the phasing of investment proposed
for various equity, loans, lease etc. covering completed project costs including tentative
drawdown/Year-wise schedule.
In case part of financing are already tie-up, give details of agencies and arrangements for tying-up
such resources. Also mention the arrangements to mobilize balance funding including that from
internal accruals.
Detailed arrangements with required PPA for sale of generated power and marketing strategy
proposed to be adopted for additional capacities being generated. The methodology for realization of
outstanding dues for sale of power including guarantees proposed should be spelt out.
All the relevant costs, prices, tariff, marginal costs of generation, transmission, distribution and
consumer surplus, and other related assumptions which become the inputs to the cost & benefit
analysis and projection of EIRR, FIRR should be defined and described. State investment analysis
should be the basis of such costs, prices and assumptions.
Based on the new projects, proposed and planned for implementation on the anvil-projected cash flow
statements be made for the borrowing entity for the plan period/five years.
4.11 Cost Benefit Analysis
All tangible and intangible costs and benefits in the analysis to be included. Both EIRR and FIRR
should be estimated and viability of the project be established. In case of negative FIRR, manner of
securing payments/repayments of PFC‟s loan to be suggested and conditions similar to IPP be
considered.
Identity key factors which are liable to cause risk in viability of he project and deal with each one of
them assessing their impact on viability. Risk factors to be discussed may include time and cost over-
run, input supply, off-take of output, receipts of sales revenue, etc.
Justification of the project from eligibility point of view as enunciated by PFC in the OPS i.e.
technical soundness, least cost alternative, achievement of stipulated minimum ROR and strengths of
the project etc. as well as from he policy angle in terms of GOI guidelines and policies.
Taking into account the overall loan appraisal, risks involved and security of PFC‟s money. Suggest
additional conditions of loan (if any) to be added to the PFC‟s standard condition of loan.
CHAPTER 5 CASE OF ABC POWER
I TITLE: Xyz Power Generation Corporation Limited (XGCL) - proposal for Term Loan of
Rs. 485.0 Crores for execution of Abc Combined Cycle Power Project (1 x 100 MW) in Xyz
expected for completion by April 2012 at an estimated cost of Rs. 692.5 Crores.
II. INTRODUCTION
PFC vide letter dated 14/09/2007 (Loan No: 62401002) had sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 297.50 Crores
(72.7 % of the project cost) to Xyz Power Generation Corporation Limited (XGCL) for Abc Gas Based
Combined Cycle Power Plant Phase-I (100 MW) in Xyz which was expected to be completed by March
2010 at a total estimated cost of Rs. 409.07 Crores (including IDC). The balance fund of Rs. 111.57
Crores (27.3% of the project cost) was to be arranged from XGCL‟s own resources. The loan documents
for the project could not be executed mainly due to the delay in obtaining MoEF clearance and non
finalization of cost pending award of EPC contract and the validity of the loan has expired. MoEF
clearance has since been obtained in December 2008 and EPC contract has been awarded to BHEL in
January 2009 and the project cost is now being projected at Rs. 692.5 Crores.
Now XGCL vide letter no. XGCL/MD/NRPP/PFCL/425 dated 21/01/2009 (copy enclosed at Annexure –
I) has requested PFC for financial assistance upto 70% of the revised project completion cost.
The proposed project will replace the existing 134 MW Abc project (which has outlived its age) and is
scheduled for completion by April 2012 at an estimated completion cost of Rs. 692.5 Crores (including
IDC of Rs. 77.2 Crores), which will be financed through equity of Rs. 207.5 Crores (30%) by
Government of Xyz/ XGCL and a debt of Rs. 485.0 Crores (70%) from PFC.
This reorganization was notified by the transfer scheme of Government of Xyz vide memo dated
10.12.2004 and given effect vide order dated August 16, 2005. As per AERCs tariff order, the GoA vide
notification no PEL.133/2003/416 dated 07/June/2007, XSEB (operating as a trading licensee in the state)
has been allowed to undertake the limited functions of bulk purchase and bulk supply. Further the
government has notified that the purchase of electricity in bulk from XGCL would be the responsibility
of XSEB and XSEB would also supply electricity in bulk to DISCOMS.
XGCL is a company incorporated with the main object of undertaking electricity generation in the state of
Xyz as a state utility. In pursuance of finalization of the First Transfer Scheme notified by the
Government of Xyz vide Notification No. PEL.151/20003Pt349 dated 16.8.05, the updated opening
balance Sheet as at 1.4.2005 has been transferred to the Company. Therefore, 2005-06 is the first year of
preparation of Annual Accounts of the Company.
Presently, XGCL has 3 (three) power plants namely Abc Thermal Power Station (119.50 MW), Lakwa
Thermal Power Station (120 MW) and Karbi Langpi HEP(100 MW). The PLF and plant availability of
these projects are as given below:-
Sl. Name of Project PLF/ Plant 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
No. Availability
1 Abc TPS PLF 39% 33% 49%
Plant Availability 40% 34% 50%
2 Lakwa TPS PLF 33% 45% 49%
Plant Availability 74% 79% 79%
3 Karbi Langpi PLF - 18% 58%
HEP(KLHEP)* Plant Availability - - 90%
*KLHEP: Unit-1 and Unit-2 was commissioned on 31.01.2007 and 20.03.2007 respectively.
Commercial operation of KLHEP was started from April, 2007. 18% PLF achieved during the year 2006-
07 was of in-firm power and availability was not counted for stabilization period of the units.
Financial Highlights
The financial of the XGCL (in Rs. Crores) are as follows:-
The Company‟s revenue from main operations grew by 61.96% at Rs. 247.65 Crores in 2007-08 as
against Rs. 152.91 Crores ring 2006-07 mainly due to increase in energy generation. There is
considerable improvement in net margin, RoE, RoNW and RoCE. The DSCR has improved to 1.42
during 2007-08 as against 1.39 during previous year. The receivables are excellent which just 6 days in
2007-08.
Business History
The status of loan sanction, execution, disbursement etc. w.r.t. XGCL as on 27.04.2009 is given below:-
Rs. in Crores
1 Loans Sanctioned and Executed 445.69
2 Loans yet to be executed 315.80
3 Total Sanction (1+2) 761.49
4 Total Disbursement 355.38
5 Total Repayment (4-6) 83.36
6 Outstanding 266.61
7 Committed disbursement from executed loans (1-4) 100.31
8 Exposure attained (2+6+7) 682.72
Entity Categorization
XGCL has been assigned Category B-notified as on 10.12.2008 and valid upto 31st March, 2009.
(Categorization as on 1/4/2009 is under approval in which XGCL is categorised as Category-A)
Exposure Limit
The maximum permissible exposure for XGCL is 100% of PFC‟s networth under prudential norms and
80% of PFC‟s networth under the OPS. The networth of PFC as on 31st December, 2008 stood at Rs.
9248 Crores. The details of actual and balance exposure applicable to XGCL as on 31st December, 2008
is as under:-
(Rs. in Crores)
Under Prudential Under OPS
Norms
Maximum Permissible Exposure 9248.00 7398.00
Actual Exposure 683.00 683.00
Balance Exposure (Sanction Limit) 8565.00 6715.00
available
Submission of Annual Accounts
As per standard terms and conditions, the Borrower shall furnish to the Corporation the unaudited annual
accounts, within three months and audited accounts within seven months of the close of the year to which
the accounts relate. XGCL has furnished the un-audited annual accounts for 2007-08.
XGCL has proposed to set up the combined cycle power plant (CCPP) with an ultimate nominal capacity
of 200 MW within the premises of the existing 134MW gas units at Abc, District Dibrugarh, and Xyz. The
plant shall be constructed in two phases each of 100 MW nominal capacity. The total capacity of the existing
Abc project is 134 MW with the following configuration
Most of these machines have outlived their age. Maintenance of the power plant has become difficult
because of the non-availability of spares as the existing units were installed 30-40 years back and out of
these six units installed in the existing plant only units 1, 3, 5 and 6 are in running condition. The plant is
currently operating at annual PLF below 50%.
The present proposal is for financial assistance for Abc Combined Cycle Power Plant Phase-I (100 MW)
in District Dibrugarh, Xyz. The existing units are proposed to be phased out once the new plant is fully
commissioned. XGCL has also informed that the second phase of the plant shall be constructed depending on
the availability of additional gas for the same.
1.1.1. Project Purpose
The following tangible and intangible benefits from the Project are envisaged:
a. 100 MW capacity to the existing Abc Combined Cycle Gas Power Project which will generate 620
MU annually at 72% PLF.
b. Improvement in Plant Load Factor thus saving fuel which is a national resource along with additional
annual generation of approximately 300 MU.
c. Improved cost of generation because of higher efficiency.
The scope of services for the project for contractor would include:
a) Engineering
b) Equipment handling
c) Project management
d) Control
e) Erection and commissioning
f) Supervision and Documentation
The civil works included in the scope of work will be Generator Turbine Building, Steam turbine building
and air washer rooms along with the foundation works for these building and other such structures
required for the proper functioning of the plant.
1.3 TECHNOLOGY
The Combine Cycle Power Plant configuration will have 1 Gas Turbine Generator, 1 Heat Recovery
Steam Generator (HRSG) and 1 Steam Turbine Generator (STG) and associated auxiliaries.
In a Gas Turbine based Combined Cycle Power Plant (CCPP), the hot exhaust gases from the Gas
Turbine are passed through heat recovery steam generator to generate steam, utilizing the residual heat
content of the exhaust gas. The generated steam is expanded in a steam turbine to generate additional
power. The high thermal efficiency of CCPP is due to combination of the two thermodynamic cycles,
Brayton cycle and Rankine cycle. The efficiency of a thermodynamic system depends directly on the
difference between temperatures of the source and the heat sink.
In conventional steam cycle (Rankine cycle), the average temperature of heat exchange with the heat
source is limited by steam temperature at inlet to turbine, which is at present, about 5400C for techno-
economic reasons in case of steam turbines. The steam cycle is however privileged by the very principle
of condensation which allows a low heat exchange temperature with the heat sink. The industrial Gas
Turbine cycle (Brayton cycle) presents the reverse situation. A high inlet gas temperature (1100 0C to
12000C) to Gas Turbine results in a high average heat exchange temperature with the heat source. A
highly favourable factor, however, is the discharge of hot exhaust gas at temperature around 500 0C to
6000C.
Combining the above two cycles is a most optimum method and attractive way of enhancing the overall
efficiency. They are complementary in that the heat exchange with the gas cycle heat source occurs at
high temperature and the exchange with the steam cycle heat sink occurs at low temperature. Thus two
very different cycles, each having different thermodynamic limitations, are combined into a very efficient
energy system, the Gas Turbine‟s role being the main contributor to the total output.
Further, the combined cycle power plants have the advantage of simplicity as well as quick start and load
change capability. They have a high ratio of power output to ground space occupied and a lower heat rate
compared to steam plants of comparable size. The only limitation of CCPP is the requirement of clean
fuel and relatively low efficiency when operating in open cycle.
CONSULTANTS: The Detailed Project Report (DPR) has been prepared by NTPC National
Productivity Council has completed the Environmental Impact Assessment studies.
POWER EVACUATION: The power from the plant is proposed to the evacuated through the existing grid
network of the state. XGCL has informed that the same is adequate for evacuation of power from the project.
The power generated from the plant will be stepped up to 220kV and will be evacuated through the 220kV
lines. An additional 220kV tie has been proposed to connect the switchyard with the 220kV switchyard of
AEGCL. Further, the proposed project would be setup in the premises of the existing 134 MW gas based
plant of XGCL at Abc, which is proposed to be phased out once the new plant is fully commissioned.
According to the LOI, the plant will be commissioned in 35 months from the zero date for the project.
Advance amounting to Rs. 18 Crores has already been released to BHEL and the final contract will be
signed soon. The contract is awarded at a cost of Rs. 564.6 Crores and is a firm price contract.
The project also requires the diversion of water intake from the existing units to the Project. The contract
for the diversion of intake will be awarded separately and may be awarded locally.
Water Availability: XGCL intends to meet the water supply requirement for the proposed project from
the Dilli River, at a distance of about 6km from site, as is being done for the existing project of XGCL at
Abc. XGCL has proposed to construct a new raw water intake pump house near Dilli River and install
new pump sets, while utilizing the existing clarifloculators (sedimentation process equipment) and pipe
lines for transportation of water. XGCL has informed that similar arrangements are already in place for its
existing power plant at Abc.
Construction Power: The requirement for supply of construction power is proposed to be met from the
existing power plant of XGCL at Abc.
Construction Access: The site is accessible by air, rail and road. Approach road to the site from the
nearest town and national highway already exists. XGCL has informed that the road has sufficient load
carrying capacity for transportation of machinery and equipment.
The energy requirement and availability for the state of Xyz for the past 6 years is given in the table
below
The peak demand and peak deficit for the state of Xyz is given in the table below
As seen in the above tables, Xyz is an energy deficient state. Hence replacing the existing Abc CCPP will
help bridge the demand supply gap.
Also the proposed Abc Combined Cycle Power Project was envisaged because of the poor performance
of the existing project and non availability of spares. Further since the efficiency of the existing machines
is low, the requirement of fuel for the generation of energy is more which meant higher cost of
generation. Thus replacing the existing Abc CCPP will help the economy by providing cheaper energy.
3.2 Linkages
Fuel Supply
XGCL is drawing 0.66 MMSCMD of gas from Xyz Gas Company Limited/Oil India Limited under the
agreement for its existing plant at Abc. As per XGCL has informed that this quantity of gas would be
sufficient for Phase-I (100MW) of the project, and that it is already under negotiation with Oil India
Limited for additional supply of gas to meet the requirement considering the ultimate capacity of 200
MW of Phase-I & Phase-II combined. A pre-disbursement condition in this regard has been stipulated
that
“if required, XGCL shall enter into/renew fuel supply and transportation agreement for the proposed
project. “
Fuel Transportation
The fuel required for the project is currently being transported through an underground pipeline of 500
MM N.B. this pipeline had been designed for a flow of 1.5 MMSCMD at 300 PSIg (Pound per Square
Inch gauge). After commissioning of the new project, the gas will be diverted through this pipeline with
minor modifications. No separate pipeline has been envisaged for this project.
The phasing of expenditure for project in the above calculation has been considered as below:-
The EPC contract for the project was awarded to BHEL based on International Competitive bidding. The
actual bid amount was 599.7 Crores by BHEL which on subsequent negotiations was reduced to 564.6
Crores. According to the environmental clearance given by MoEF, the project cost has been taken as
724.9 Crores which was based on the initial offer by BHEL. According to XGCL, the prices of the gas
turbines in the international markets have increased by a factor of 30%.
The cost of the project in plains differs with the cost of the project in hilly terrain. Also Xyz faces the law
and order problem and thus not able to find many bidders for the projects which also has a bearing on the
project cost being on the higher side. Hence the project cost arrived at is based on the actual tendered cost
and is therefore justified.
XGCL would enter into Power Purchase Agreement 3 months prior to the commissioning of the project
to the satisfaction of PFC.
The Financial analysis has been carried out based on the year wise expected tariffs (calculated as per
CERC norms). The project related assumptions for the purpose of financial modeling are detailed below:
-
Assumptions
Performance Parameters
Capacity 98.4 MW
Station Heat Rate (Kcal/kWH) 1705
Plant Load Factor 72%
Calorific Value of Gas 8200 Kcal/m3
Rate per SCM (Rs. /SCM) 2.436
Project Commissioning date April 2012
Gross Generation 620 MU
Net Saleable Energy 583 MU
Total Aux cons. 6.1%
Plant life 25 years
Discounting Factor 12%
Financial
Debt Rs. 485.0 Crores
Equity Rs. 207.5 Crores
Repayment 15 years
Interest Rate (post-COD) 12.00% p.a.
Interest Rate (pre -COD) 12.25% p.a.
Interest on Working capital 12.00%
Working capital months taken 2
ROE payable in MAT year 17.50%
ROE payable in Corporate Tax Year 23.25%
Depreciation Rate
Civil Works CERC 3.34%
Machinery CERC 5.28%
Civil works Taxation 10% (WDV)
Machinery Taxation 25% (WDV)
Income Tax
Rate 30%
Surcharge 10%
Education cess 3%
MAT
Rate 10%
Surcharge 10%
Education cess 3%
For calculating IDC, uniform phasing of total expenditure in a year across each quarter is assumed. The
yearly phasing for the project has been assumed at 20% for the 1st year, 40% for the 2nd year and 40% for
the 3rd year.
10.0 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
DSCR Calculations: The DSCR for the instant project is given below:
DSCR Value
Average 1.33
Minimum 1.26
Maximum 1.55
PFC had sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 297.50 Crores to Xyz Power Generation Corporation Limited
(XGCL) for Abc Project in 2007. The comparison of the various parameters of the earlier sanction with the
instant proposal is given below
Time overrun: The project is located in North East where progress is affected by the frequent law
and order problems. According to the LOI issued to BHEL, the completion time for the project is 35
months. The implementation schedule in the earlier sanction by PFC was 23 months which has now been
increased. Since the schedule has already been stretched by 12 months, the risk of time overrun is
expected to be minimal.
Escalation in project cost: Due to time overrun and increase in interest rates the cost of the project
gets escalated. The contracts for the project have already been awarded on a firm price. The interest rates
are likely to decrease in the coming months and since the project has been awarded lately with increased
implementation duration, risk of escalation in project cost is minimized but cannot be ruled out.
Fuel Linkage: Some of the gas based projects in the past have faced crisis because of the
unavailability of gas in spite of the gas tie-up. XGCL currently has a fuel tie-up of 0.66 MMSCMD being
used for the existing project. Hence no major problem is anticipated. However if the gas linkage needs to
be modified for the power plant, XGCL will have to get the FSA modified. A condition in this regard has
been stipulated
In order to ensure smooth flow, it is proposed that IDC for PFC loan amounting to about Rs. 77.2 Crores
will be reimbursed/ adjusted. With the sanction of PFC loan financial closure will be achieved and this is
allowed as per policy.
a) As per PFC policy, XGCL is eligible for financial assistance from PFC and comes under grade B
(Categorization as on 1/4/2009 is under approval in which XGCL is categorised as Category-A).
b) XGCL has not been declared as defaulter
c) The sanction limit available to XGCL as on 31st December 2008 works out to Rs. 6715 Crores in
terms of OPS.
As per OPS, financial assistance will normally be provided for the projects which meet the following
criteria:-
a) Are techno-economically sound with Financial or Economic Rate of Return of not less than 12% (as
may be applicable).
b) Are feasible and technically sound and provide optimal cost solutions for the selected alternative.
c) Are compatible with integrated power development and expansion plans of the
State/Region/Country.
d) Compliance to environmental guidelines, standards and conditions.
e) Schemes should have obtained the required clearances.
XGCL has obtained all the statutory clearances and land has already been acquired for the project. The
project is techno-economically viable with FIRR of 15.41%. Investment cost of about Rs. 6.93 Crores per
MW is high but is based on the actual tendered cost. The project will generate 620 MU of energy
annually and expected tariff at Rs. 2.91 per unit in the first year of generation is attractive. The project is
compatible with the expansion plans of the State/Region/Country.
As per policy of PFC, 80% of the project cost can be considered for sanctioning of loan. In the instant
case XGCL has only sought financing for 70% of the project cost.
In view of physical benefits as above, positive EIRR and FIRR being projected, the loan proposal is
justified.
(i) XGCL shall offer security towards repayment of loan in the form of charge on assets of the
project (Abc Combined Cycle Power Project Phase-I), both movable and immovable, present and future,
to the satisfaction of PFC.
(ii) XGCL shall also open/enhance escrow account as per PFC policy
Repayment: Repayment shall be made in 60 quarterly instalments after a 6 months principal moratorium
period from the date of commissioning of the project.
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
XGCL has obtained major statutory clearances and land required for the project is already in possession
of XGCL. No Rehabilitation and Resettlement issues are involved in the project. The project has already
been accorded environmental clearance by the Ministry of Environment and forest. The project is techno-
economically viable with FIRR of 15.41%. Investment cost of about Rs. 6.93 Crores per MW is high but
is based on the actual tendered cost. The project will generate 620 MU of energy annually. XGCL has
already entered into an MoU with Xyz State Electricity Board (XSEB) for sale of power from the
proposed Phase-I (100MW) project and a firm PPA will be signed before the commissioning of the
project.
As per policy, upto 80% of the project cost can be considered for sanctioning the loan. However in this
case, XGCL has sought financing for 70% of the project cost.
In view of physical benefits as above, positive FIRR being projected, the loan proposal is justified and it
is recommended that the proposal for providing Rupee Term Loan of Rs. 485.0 Crores. (Rupees Four
Hundred Eighty Five Crores only) to XGCL for Abc Combined Cycle Power Project Phase-I , on
standard terms and conditions, as applicable to thermal generation schemes in the state sector, security
package mentioned in Para 14.0 above and applicable additional conditions may be approved by the
Loans Committee.
If the proposal is agreed to, Loans Committee of Directors may consider passing the following resolution:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Pre-Commitment Condition
1. XGCL to furnish an undertaking that it shall obtain all statutory and non statutory clearances as
and when required during the implementation of the project.
Pre-Disbursement conditions
1. XGCL shall enter into/renew fuel supply and transportation agreement for the proposed project, if
required.
2. XGCL to provide the source of equity to the satisfaction of PFC. Alternatively, XGCL to arrange
a letter of comfort from Govt. of Xyz addressed to PFC expressing the commitment to meet any shortfall
in equity requirement for the project.
3. NOC & ceding from the existing lenders, if any, shall be obtained.
Other conditions
1. XGCL would enter into a Power Purchase Agreement 3 months prior to the commissioning of the
project to the satisfaction of PFC.
2. Reimbursement of expenses incurred from 14.06.07 shall be permissible for the project.
Chapter 6: BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agarwal, Aman, "A New Approach & Model for Weather Derivative Instrument based on Water Table
for Floods, Droughts and Rainfall" prepared for Financial Sector Development Department, The World
Bank, Washington DC, USA; Finance India XVI No 3, September 2002.INDIA
Agarwal J. D., Agarwal A. (2004), "Financing of Power Projects", International Conference on “India
Hydro 2004” Indian Institute of Finance, Delhi
Raghuram G.; Rekha Jain; Sidharth Sinha; Prem Pangotra and Sebastian Morris, "Infrastructure
Development and Financing", MacMillian India Ltd.
http://www.cercind.gov.in/
http://www.pfcindia.com/
http://www.powermin.nic.in/
http://www.sbicaps.com/
Chapter 7: APPENDICES
Annexure 1: Abbrivations
BLOT Build-Lease-Operate-Transfer
BOOT Build-Own-Operate-Transfer
Dependent Variables
Project Cost 692.48 696.05 692.48 692.48 692.48 692.48 692.48 696.05
FIRR 15.41% 15.59% 15.37% 15.45% 15.66% 15.95% 15.41% 15.92%
Average DSCR 1.33 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
Minimum DSCR 1.26 1.28 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.28
Levellised Tariff 3.03 3.05 3.46 3.17 3.91 4.94 3.12 4.36
Levellised Cost of Generation 2.27 2.28 2.54 2.40 3.14 4.17 2.33 3.56
Annexure 4: Tariff Calculations
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Annexure 5: Projected Cash Flow Statement