0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
227 vues1 page
This rubric evaluates individual or group projects on a scale of 1 to 5 in two categories: quality of content and product presentation. For quality of content, it evaluates information gathering, references, and synthesis of information to the problem statement. For product presentation, it evaluates the overall theme, technical design, and creativity displayed in presenting the research findings through a poster, display board, or newsletter. Scores of 1 indicate beginning level work, 3 indicates accomplished work meeting some criteria, and 5 indicates work at a professional level meeting all criteria outlined.
This rubric evaluates individual or group projects on a scale of 1 to 5 in two categories: quality of content and product presentation. For quality of content, it evaluates information gathering, references, and synthesis of information to the problem statement. For product presentation, it evaluates the overall theme, technical design, and creativity displayed in presenting the research findings through a poster, display board, or newsletter. Scores of 1 indicate beginning level work, 3 indicates accomplished work meeting some criteria, and 5 indicates work at a professional level meeting all criteria outlined.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
This rubric evaluates individual or group projects on a scale of 1 to 5 in two categories: quality of content and product presentation. For quality of content, it evaluates information gathering, references, and synthesis of information to the problem statement. For product presentation, it evaluates the overall theme, technical design, and creativity displayed in presenting the research findings through a poster, display board, or newsletter. Scores of 1 indicate beginning level work, 3 indicates accomplished work meeting some criteria, and 5 indicates work at a professional level meeting all criteria outlined.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
(Individual / Group Work) Total marks = 15 Quality of Content (10 marks)
Criteria Beginning Accomplished Professional
1 3 5 Information gathering 1. Research 1. There is evidence 1. An in-depth research gathering process of research gathering process. - Data/Results very minimal. gathering process. - Quality of 2. High level of information 2. No evidence of information synthesis 2. Minimal attempt para-phrasing made to synthesize displayed to suit the information to suit information problem statement. problem statement. gathered to suit the problem statement.
References All references are At least 3 references At least 5 references are
online resources. No are from scientific from scientific journals / references made from journals / articles / articles / books. scientific books/ books. articles etc
Product – Either Poster / Display Board / Newsletter (5 m)
Beginning Accomplished Professional
1 3 5 Presentation – 1. No overall theme 1. Evidence of 1. Presentation has a Technical Design & for the final presentation with a theme with an overall Creativity product. theme. professional look. (appealing to 2. Little creativity 2. Moderate level of audience) displayed in the creativity displayed in presentation of the presentation of 2. High level of research research creativity displayed in the presentation of research