Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • Assessment Feedback 1

    Transféré par

    zelder71
    13 vues1 page
    This document provides success criteria for a geography assessment across four levels - 7/8, 6, 5, and 4. The level 7/8 criteria expect accurate facts sourced from research, an analysis of information and personal opinions, detailed explanations of diagrams/graphs, conclusions backed by evidence, and an evaluation of the project process. Level 6 requires similar but less detailed analysis, explanations, conclusions, and evaluation. Level 5 expects good answers and descriptions but lacking detail, starting to make conclusions and evaluate information, and explanations of diagrams. Level 4 has incomplete answers, few explanations, lack of vocabulary, and poor teamwork.

    Description originale:

    Titre original

    Assessment_Feedback_1

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formats disponibles

    DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document provides success criteria for a geography assessment across four levels - 7/8, 6, 5, and 4. The level 7/8 criteria expect accurate facts sourced from research, an analysis of information and personal opinions, detailed explanations of diagrams/graphs, conclusions backed by evidence, and an evaluation of the project process. Level 6 requires similar but less detailed analysis, explanations, conclusions, and evaluation. Level 5 expects good answers and descriptions but lacking detail, starting to make conclusions and evaluate information, and explanations of diagrams. Level 4 has incomplete answers, few explanations, lack of vocabulary, and poor teamwork.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    13 vues1 page

    Assessment Feedback 1

    Transféré par

    zelder71
    This document provides success criteria for a geography assessment across four levels - 7/8, 6, 5, and 4. The level 7/8 criteria expect accurate facts sourced from research, an analysis of information and personal opinions, detailed explanations of diagrams/graphs, conclusions backed by evidence, and an evaluation of the project process. Level 6 requires similar but less detailed analysis, explanations, conclusions, and evaluation. Level 5 expects good answers and descriptions but lacking detail, starting to make conclusions and evaluate information, and explanations of diagrams. Level 4 has incomplete answers, few explanations, lack of vocabulary, and poor teamwork.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 1

    Geography Assessment Success Criteria

    Read through the criteria to ensure you reach the highest level you can!

    Level Success Criteria and PLTS* you will use:


    7/8 Accurate facts with the source of information given (ie which books, websites and
    authors were used). [IE, SM]
    Information has been analysed and a personal opinion given, including whether there is
    any bias. [RL, EP]
    Diagrams, graphs, pictures, photos and tables of data have been included and they
    have been explained in detail [CT].
    Excellent conclusions have been made and all arguments have been backed up by real
    scientific evidence. [IE, RL, CT]
    An excellent evaluation of how the project was created: what would have you done
    differently if you had to do it again? What PLTS did you use? Why not others? [RL]
    Excellent geographical vocabulary. [IE]
    Excellent team working and collaboration. [TW]
    Excellent presentation. [CT]

    6 Accurate facts with the source of information given (ie which books, websites and
    authors were used). [IE, SM]
    Information has started to be analysed and occasional personal opinions have been
    given. [RL, EP]
    A diagram, graph or table of data has been included with a brief explanation. [CT].
    Good conclusions have been made and some arguments have been backed up by real
    scientific evidence. [IE, RL, CT]
    A brief evaluation has been given of how the project was put together and any changes
    that would be made next time. [RL]
    Very good geographical vocabulary. [IE]
    Very good team working and collaboration. [TW]
    Very good presentation. [CT]
    5 Good answers to most of the questions with good descriptions and explanations but
    lacking in detail. [IE, SM]
    Starting to make conclusions about the information that has been read. [RL, EP]
    Starting to evaluate (what are the good and bad things) about the information. [RL]
    Diagrams have been drawn but there is little writing to explain what they mean. [CT].
    Good geographical vocabulary. [IE]
    Good team working and collaboration. [TW]
    Good presentation. [CT]
    4 Not all of the tasks answered. [IE, SM]
    Descriptions given with only a few explanations.
    Diagrams have been drawn but there is little writing to explain what they mean.
    Lack of geographical vocabulary.
    Poor team working. [TW]
    3 No structure.
    Untidy presentation.
    Lack of information.

    *PLTS IE: Independent Enquiry RL: Reflective Learners


    EP: Effective Participants CT: Creative Thinkers
    SM: Self Managers TW: Team Workers

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi