Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
BRITISH
MILITARY
SWORDS
1786 - 1912
THE REGULATION
PATTERNS
AN ILLUSTRATED
PRICE GUIDE
FOR COLLECTORS
Harvey J. S. Withers
CHAPTER 3
British Infantry Swords
1786/1796 PATT. INFANTRY OFFICER’S SWORD HILT:
Gilt brass but also
1. 2. 3. 4. found in steel (mainly
1786 Spadroon types).
Plain brass for NCO‟s
– 1786/1796.
GRIP:
Ivory / ebony or horn
to 1786 Spadroon
versions
1786/1796 Patterns
Patterns::
Steel/silver twistwire
or a sheet silver
simulated “twistwire”
wrap.
This pattern of sword was adopted soon after the official abolition of the Officer‟s Spontoon, or half
pike, which had become little more than a symbol of authority in the field of battle, rather than an ef- SCABBARD:
fective combat weapon. King George III approved the introduction of a straight bladed, single Black leather with gilt
fullered sword, and early 1786 Pattern spadroon-type versions are to be found with a straight, beaded brass mounts.
knucklebow, reeded ivory grip and cushion, vase or urn-shaped pommels (figure 1.). This was soon An all steel “field”
replaced by a double shell guard. It is this pattern of sword that is more commonly encountered. version has been
Early examples of the 1786 Pattern (figure 4.) have a rigid double shell guard that was superceded in noted.
1796 for one that had a folding guard (figure 3.). This adaptation enabled the officer to avoid fraying
his uniform. An NCO pattern (figure 2.) is also found with plain brass hilt, blade and scabbard BLADE LENGTH:
mounts. Hilt and scabbard mounts were plain brass. It is much rarer than the officer„s sword as they Approx. 32”.
were normally discarded when unserviceable. The 1796 Pattern was the mainstay of the British Infan-
try Officer for over 25 years and the design influenced many other countries, most notably the United
States, where the Model 1840 non-commissioned officer‟s sword bears a striking resemblance. Its
obvious defects and fighting inadequacy were no doubt the cause of many unnecessary deaths
amongst British officers. Protection to the hand was minimal, and the blade was rather thin and
flimsy.
It is not a scarce sword for the collector to acquire but most examples are in poor condition due to the
fragility of the folding guard. Worn blades, and the tendency for the quillon to snap off (look out for
poorly re-attached quillons) are also common. This is made worse by the frequent absence of the gilt
brass and leather scabbard which easily perished both in the field and after years of careless storage.
Swords with substantial blue and gilt decoration remaining to the blade and complete with original
scabbard, can command very high prices. Good examples are becoming extremely difficult to locate
in the market. Many examples are marked “JJ Runkel” to the blade edge. John Runkel had an office
in London and was a major importer of German blades for the British Army during the Napoleonic
Wars.
Other makers names found on blades include Birmingham swordsmiths, Woolley and Deakin and
London makers, Brunn, Prosser and Salter.
By 1800, this type of curved sabre had already been unofficially adopted by many light infantry offi- BLADE LENGTH:
Approx. 31”.
cers, and it was only a matter of time before official recognition came in 1803 (figures 1. and 2.).
One of the most attractive of British pattern swords, it has numerous subtle variations in design, most
notably to the royal cypher on the knuckle-bow and the lions-head pommel (figures 3., 4. and 6.). The
knucklebow can also feature either a bugle or flaming grenade above the royal crown, denoting use 6.
by both grenadiers and rifle companies. Blades were also lavishly decorated with blue and gilt. Its
curved, cavalry type blade borrowed much from the eastern scimitar, and it quickly enjoyed quite a
vogue amongst officers returning from the recent Egyptian campaigns. Although apparently unsuited
to fighting on the ground (its curved blade would have been more effective when slashed from the
saddle), style over substance seems to have won the day. Lieutenant William Smith of the 77th Foot
(Middlesex Regiment) carried this pattern as he “hewed and slashed his way through the enemy” be-
fore succumbing to his many wounds at the Battle of Ciudad Rodrigo in the Peninsular War. Most
examples are found without scabbards but it is worth holding on until you can locate a complete
200
PAGE 26
piece. This sword looks most attractive when paired with its gilt brass mounted scabbard. Examples
with ivory grips were likely to have been carried by more senior officers (figure 5.).
British Military Swords 1786 – 1912
1803
PATTERN
INFANTRY
OFFICER’S
SWORD
Above:
Two views of an 1803 Infantry
1803 Officer’s sword, retaining much
PATTERN original gilding.
LIONSHEAD
POMMELS
1.
1796 1796
PATTERN PATTERN
LIGHT HEAVY
CAVALRY CAVALRY
OFFICER’S OFFICER’S
(UNDRESS)
SWORD SWORD
PAGE 49
British Military Swords 1786 – 1912
1820 1848
PATTERN PATTERN
(LIFE GUARDS) (ROYAL HORSE
CAVALRY GUARDS)
TROOPER’S CAVALRY
SWORD TROOPER’S
SWORD
This
PAGE 58
is evident in
the large, brass The Queen’s Bays, 1912.
studs placed on the
bowl edge.
British Military Swords 1786 – 1912
1895 1857
PATTERN PATTERN
HIGHLAND (ROYAL ENGINEERS)
INFANTRY INFANTRY
SERGEANT’S OFFICER’S
BROADSWORD BROADSWORD
Sergeant,
Royal Scots,
c.1890.
200
PAGE 68
British Military Swords 1786 – 191
19122
1805
PATTERN
NAVAL
OFFICER’S
SWORD