Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Table 26.Summary of quantitative performance data of described individual plants.

Plant Boiler system Fuels used Capa- Steam data Efficiencies Investment costs Emissions
(country, (moist.cont. city 1992US$2
start up year) [%, weight, [MWe]
w.m.]) boiler turbine, e,net Boiler Total NOx CO Particulates
[%] gross [%] $/kWth $/kWe [mg/MJin] [mg/MJin] [mg/MJin]
[%] (% of
T [oC] P [bar] flow [kg/s] HHV LHV HHV LHV total)

Average Zurn/NEPCO
plants (-,-) travelling grate wood (50) 25 510 86 - - - - 24 28 - 1200 - 1600 1298 215 -3

Delano I plant (USA, agr. waste


1991) BFB (24) 27 513 93 32 78 86 35 26 29 - - 257 6.5 -3

McNeil plant (USA, wood (47)


1984) travelling grate 50 510 92 61 70 83 39 25 30 82 (13) 1800 748 177 4

Måbjergværket CHP water cooled straw (16)


plant (DK, 1993) vibrating grate wood (40) 341 520 100 35 - 89 36 - 301 - 2900 1088 130 4
/ "cigar- msw (23)
burning" nat. gas (0)

Händelöverket CHP CFB wood (50) 461 538 70 44 74 89 38 271 321 224 (-) 11006 508 90 10
boiler (S, 1994)

Enköping CHP plant water cooled wood (45) 281 540 130 30 82 96 37 281 331 253 (38) 1900 327 90 -5
(S, 1995) vibrating grate

Grenaa CHP plant CFB coal (10) 271 505 38 27 944 1004 37 321,4 351,4 290 (33) 2500 1507 200 50
(DK, 1992) straw (16)

EPON co-fire plant pulverised coal demolition 20 - - - - - - 34 37 - 8005 - - -


(Nl, 1995) boiler wood (16)

Whole Tree Energy pile/grate whole trees 100 - - - 82 90 41 33 38 - 1500 - - -


concept (-, -) boiler (44)

ELSAM cofiring coal (10)


scale-up project CFB straw (16) 250 580 250-300 - - - - - 44 - - - - -
(DK,2005) wood (45)

1
Because the main interest of the project is electricity production, for CHP plants a theoretical estimation has been made of how much electricity could be generated when there was no heat supply.
2
Costs are converted into 1992 US dollars by using the GDP price deflator of the country in which the costs are made.
3
Units could not be converted. Emissions given were : Zurn/NEPCO : 0.65 mg/dcsf, Delano I : 0.52 mg/dcsf at 12 % CO 2 and Enköping : 40 mg/Nm3 at 6 % O2.
4
Efficiencies probably about 5 to 10 % lower because of inaccurate data. This would lead to a LHV electrical efficiency of about 32-33 %.
5
Costs only for additional investments for wood cofiring (pretreatment + burner)
6
Costs only (complete costs for) CFB boiler and pretreatment of wood.
7
Emissions are given for MCR situation.
8
Emissions are given for average situation over certain period.

79
80

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi