Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Similarities Wiliam Edward Joseph M. Juran Philips P.

Crosby
Deming

Importance of In Deming’s view, the Like Deming, Juran also Mr. Crosby defined
customer consumer is by sees quality as a quality as a conformity
requirements as necessity the most concept which can only to certain specifications
standard important part of the be usefully defined by set forth by
production system: the consumer.  Strictly management and not
without a consumer, put, Juran defines some vague concept of
there is no reason to quality as "fitness for "goodness." These
produce.  use." specifications are not
arbitrary either; they
must be set according
to customer needs and
wants.

The Responsible for Quality is made in the The process of Quality improvement
quality-management board room. developing ideas was a starts from the top.To
Dr.Deming's ideas of gradual one for Dr. create a manufacturing
hard work, sincerity, Juran. Top management process that has zero
decency, and personal involvement, the Pareto defects management
responsibility, forever principle, the need for must set the tone and
changed the world of widespread training in atmosphere for
management. "It is not quality, the definition of employees to follow. If
enough to just do your quality as fitness for management does not
best or work hard. You use. Majority of Quality create a system by
must know what to problems are the fault which zero defects,not
work on." of poor management that’s close enough.
rather than poor
workmanship.

Goal of quality Meet/exceed customer continuous Continuous


needs; continuous improvement. improvement by setting
improvement. zero defects
production.

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENT BETWEEN WILLIAM EDWARD DEMING, JOSEPH M. JURAN AND PHILIPS P.
CROSBY

1
Different Wiliam Edward Joseph M. Juran Philips P.Crosby
Deming
Basic orientation Technical- To Deming, Process-Juran's work Motivational- Crosby
toward quality the only meaningful focuses on the idea of made two key points in
definition of quality is process that his arguments about
that which the organizational quality the responsibility of the
consumer specifies.  A problems are largely quality
product could meet the result of insufficient department.First, he
every possible technical and ineffective planning argued that quality, as a
specification and be for quality. In addition, managed process, could
offered at an Juran fleshed out many be a source of profit for
appropriate price, but if of the implementation an organization.
it is the wrong product, issues involved with Second, Crosby adopted
it is worthless to the quality through his a "zero defects"
consumer.  trilogy. approach to
quality management,
and emphasized the
behavioral and
motivational
aspects of quality
improvement rather
than statistical
approaches.

What is quality? Nonfaulty systems Fitness for use. Conformance to


freedom from requirements
Deming addressed the trouble
entire process and Juran defines quality as Mr. Crosby defined
focused primarily the "fitness for use”, the quality as a conformity
assertion quality as a concept to certain specifications
that poor quality is not which can only be set forth by
the fault of the worker, usefully defined by management and not
but is the fault of the the consumer. some vague concept of
system. Deming also Juran's work focuses on "goodness." These
strongly opposed the the idea that specifications are not
creation of quality organizational quality arbitrary either; they
inspection freedom from trouble must be set according
departments. to achive result of to customer needs and
sufficient and effective wants.
planning for
setting the goal of
quality.

2
14-point program Breakthrough projects; 14-step program; cost
Chief elements of Dr. Deming's famous 14 quality council; quality of quality; quality
implementation Points, originally teams. management "maturity
presented in Out of the grid".
Crisis, serve as
management
guidelines. The points
cultivate a fertile soil in
which a more efficient
workplace, higher
profits, and increased
productivity may grow.

Inspection / defect Cease dependence on Operator errors can be Two factors cause
control inspection to achieve reduced by : defects or mistakes :
quality. Eliminate the foolproofing , keeping -Lack of knowledge and
need for mass people lack of attention.
inspection by building attentive,training ,
quality into the product changing technology ,
in the first place. improving
communication ,
establishing
accountabilty ,
removing the error-
prone person and
motivation.

Improvement basis Repeated use of PDSA Quality improvement is


cycle. Quality improvement built on getting
Put everyone in the raises quality everyone to do it right
company to work to performance to the first time (DIRFT).
accomplish the imprecedented or break Quality improvement is
transformation. The through levels. a process ,not a
transformation is every program , and it takes a
body's job. long time for it to
become a normal part
of the scene.
 
Cost of quality - Companies should - Cost Of Poor Quality - Measurement of
look at the total cost of (COPQ) is the sum of all quality is the price of
product or service costs that would non conformance , not
provided by others , disappear if there were indexes.
and not just the no quality problems. - Price of non
purchase price.   conformance is by
Accepting the lowest - Quality improvement counting every thing
bid does not guarantee does not come free. that is spent if every
the lowest total cost. thing was not done
right the first time.

3
4

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi