Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Taylor Leverett
Weaver
LNG 406
25 March 2011
Questions on Meaning
we justify lying to the big-guy institutions.” (par.3) her thesis gives way to her later
topics of discussion in her essay and goes in correlation with the headlines of the
2. Does Ericsson think it’s possible to eliminate lies from our lives? What evidence
Ericsson does not think it’s possible to eliminate lies from our lives because she gives
evidence of different types of lies lied by people or the government that we assume
we can trust not to in some cases. The Omission lie involves religion where in
Christianity, in actuality; Lilith “defied Adam’s need to control her” yet many
Christian teachings today tell the story of Adam and Eve being banished together
away from the Garden of Eden because of their unruly behavior to control themselves
of temptation.
The essay’s purpose is not to gratify the types of lies but to give light to the paths of
deception. Ericsson purposefully goes into depth with the different types of lies to
truly explain the real meaning behind lying and the ways to do it.
1. Ericsson starts out by recounting her own four-lie day. What is the effect of this
introduction?
Ericsson recounts her four-lie day to hyphen the reality of the types of lying today.
Also, with giving account to her own lying behaviors, it gives the reader a real
glimpse of the author and it makes the author seem more on a personal level with the
reader.
quotation that forecasts a theme. Which of these epigraphs work best, do you
The epigraph that works the best would be “We lie loudest when we lie to ourselves”
because it basically tells of when people lie to the point of delusion, What can they
believe? Ericsson states that some omit to lying by “lubricating the daily machinery
of life” by “embellishing” the truth until even they themselves begin to believe their
own lies.
3. What is the message of Ericsson’s conclusion? Does the conclusion work well?
Ericsson’s message in her conclusion would be that lying does have its benefits at the
moment but ultimately it’s you who have to live with the emotional backfire to the
Leverett 3
lie. The conclusion works well because it leaves the audience with an open door to
4. Other methods. Examine the way Ericsson uses definition and example to
support her classification. Which definitions are clearest? Which examples are the
Ericsson uses definition to hyphen her meaning behind the idea of lying. She
primarily focuses on the overall, general type of lie associated with today and many
people, and then she examines each type of lie by also giving the reader examples to
go by. This technique helps Ericsson be more effective in telling her story and more
clearly defines many of her key points relating to her theme as well. The definitions
of Delusion and Stereotypes and Clichés are the clearest because they go straight into
the topic of discussion as well as give key examples to support. Personally, all of the
lies are ultimately effective because they truly define more of the theme in the essay
Questions on Language
1. Look up any of these words you do not know: haggard; travails; facades; plethora;
myriad; reticent.