0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
12 vues1 page
The gift is not an individual action but one of collectives, not meant to create wealth but o build a connection. The rich must come back to considering themselvesfreely and also by obligationas the financial guardians of their fellow citizens. Gifts automatically make the receiver immediately inferior, but charity's main point is to remove this separation.
The gift is not an individual action but one of collectives, not meant to create wealth but o build a connection. The rich must come back to considering themselvesfreely and also by obligationas the financial guardians of their fellow citizens. Gifts automatically make the receiver immediately inferior, but charity's main point is to remove this separation.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
The gift is not an individual action but one of collectives, not meant to create wealth but o build a connection. The rich must come back to considering themselvesfreely and also by obligationas the financial guardians of their fellow citizens. Gifts automatically make the receiver immediately inferior, but charity's main point is to remove this separation.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Intro Page 3: What rule of legality and self-interest, in societies of a backward or archaic type, compels the gift that has been received to be obligatorily reciprocated? What power resides in the object given that causes its recipient to pay it back? Potlatch: gift and ritualistic exchange involving extreme decadence to the point of wastefulness Giving is not an individual action but one of collectives, not meant to create wealth but o build a connection The Obligation to Give; The Obligation to Receive -to reciprocate presents received -to give presents -to receive them Trobriand Example : Kula circular inter exchange between tribe’s chieftains- noble and disinterested pg. 22 Mwali- bracelets; soulava- necklace Three obligations to give, receive, reciprocate pg. 39 The obligation to accept pg. 41 “Originally- so much is sure- things themselves had a personality and an inherent power” pg. 49 familia- etymology fevers more to objects than things The land, the food, and all that one gives are, moreover, personified: they are living creatures with whom one enters a dialogue, and who share in a contract. Pg 56 It is the nature of food to be shared out…. Wealth is made to be given away. Pg.57 Pg 58-60 delineates Hindu perception of “gifts” and the indivisible connection amongst giver, recipient, and the gift itself. German wadium is a pledge -ie. glove or staff that binds the honor of the giver in a contract. Gifts automatically make the receiver immediately inferior, but charity’s main point is to remove this separation. Things sold must be detached from previous owner; “basic imperialism” of human beings Conclusions: “… the rich must come back to considering themselves- freely and also by obligation- as the financial guardians of their fellow citizens.” “Thus we can and must return to archaic society and to elements in it.” pg.69 “…to emerge from self, to give freely, and obligatorily. We run no risk of disappointment.” pg. 71 Hybrid of purely gratuitous and purely pragmatic giving is the only way for the future