Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

The Definition of an Analogy By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., M.B.A., Phd. Perpetual Copyright (2011 C.E.) by Anthony J.

. Fejfar, and Neothomist, P.C.. (PA). Some rationalists and logical positivists seem to have a hard time coming to grips with analogical thought processes. Yet, it is quite easy to define an analogy which is the basis for an analogical thought process. You see, an analogy is present when some fact or idea is like or analogous to another. Thus, an oak tree is not a yew tree, but an oak tree is analogous or like a yew tree. What then makes two ideas or fact similar enough to say that hey are alike or analogous? I assert that when two fact or ideas have several characteristics in common then they are analogous. Similarly, a fact and an idea or a sense experience and a idea can also be analogous in some circumstances. Consider the following: The oak tree is analogous to the yew tree.

The oak tree and the yew tree have the following characteristics in common:
1. both have bark 2. both have branches 3. both have a trunk 4. both have leaves 5. both engage in photosenthesis

Thus, we can see that two ideas or facts and idea and a fact are analogous when each has several factors in common. Therefore, it is perfectly logical, rational, and reasonable to engage in analogical thought processes and use analogies.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi