Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 24

Food Poisoning Outbreak

Lakkana Thaikruea,
M.D., M.S., PhD.
Community Medicine Dept
Faculty of Medicine, Chiang
Mai University, Thailand
Reference
Handicapped Sport Day
Province X, 25-36 August 1990
Methods
• Study design: Retrospective cohort
• Population: Participants in sport event
• Descriptive study
– Time, place, person
– Environmental survey
• Analytic study
– Relative risk, 95% confidence intervals
– Unconditional logistic regression
The participants,
Cafeteria of campus
Food Items of Dinner
Beef curry
Éclair

Salted egg
Kitchen Number 1
Kitchen Number 1 (cont.)
Kitchen Number 1 (cont.)
Kitchen Number 2
Kitchen Number 2 (cont.)
Ear swab
Cook A Throat swab
Cook B: Ear swab Cook C: Throat swab
Descriptive Study
• Person
– Characteristics
– Incidence rates (or Attack rates)
– Signs and symptoms
• Time
– Exposure time, Onset of symptom (s)
– Incubation period
• Place
– Environment
– Sanitation
– Process
Analytic Study
• Univariate analysis
– Compare attack rates by food items
– relative risk, 95 % confidence interval
• Stratified analysis
– Control for confounding factors (few
variables)
– Check interaction
• Multivariate analysis
– Control for confounding factors (many
variables)
– Multiple logistic regression-unconditional
Crude Relative Risk
The more people ate, the more people got sick
Versus
Contaminated pieces
Multivariate Analysis
• Unconditional logistic regression
• Adjusted RR 12 (95%CI = 9, 22)
• Eating éclairs was associated with food
poisoning illness
Laboratory Results:
Food Specimens
Laboratory Results: Cooks
Laboratory results: Confirm
Six month old boy who ate 1 item of
suspected meal and ill

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi