Vernon’s ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS Volume 1A CONSTITUTION Article Z §§ 10 to 16 WEST PUBLISHING CO. ST. PAUL, MINN,ARTICLE I BILL OF RIGHTS ‘Sections 1 0 9 appear in Volume 1 ‘Searches und sernures ‘of accused in criminal prosecutions Excel fines; cruel remedy by due course of 14. Double jeopardy, Ri property for public use; spectal privileges and sn ad ranches, ‘Of Rights excepted from powers uf gover $10. Rights of accused incriminal prosecutions See. 10. ‘wial by an wave a speedy public ive the Fight to demand the nature and 2 Art, 1, $10 RIGHTS OF ACCUSED nd 0 give evidence against him: himself or counsel, oF both, shall be confronted by 1 agai ny process for obtaining witnesses favor, except that when the witness resides aut of the charged & a violation of any of the a land the State shall have the Fight to produce and have the evidence admitted by ‘deposition, under such rules and laws as the Legislature may herealter provide; and no person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense, unless on an rand jury, exces iment is by therwise than in the penit Amended Now. 5, 1948. INTERPRETIVE COMMENTARY The terminology here use iss responsibilities by Grimett¥. State, 22 Tex App. 36.2 5.631 Ce 81, 44 SW. 989 (1898). And, when the court but the judge and bis, fourtesh amendment of the Foders S.C 499, 353 US. 257, 92 LEA. 682 (1988), 3BILL OF RIGHTS i unprejdiced, distoterested, equitable, end jus: A jurars wh have and cause wee conlerred upon fhm wo learn in advance he's being charged, ed to give evidence against ty from selFincrimination. Such al proceedings 15); Long v. Site, 120, 30); Vernon's Ann C.CP. art 710, 8 may be required to proce RIGHTS OF ACCUSED Art. 1, $10 Andrens, supra 's granted to a witness, he may be compelled to testify. Ex pa ‘2 ‘The right of the aceused 0 be heard by right which an accused can under no ‘counsel in private prior to the tral in order to prepare fis defense. Turner v. State, 9 CER, 627, 241 SW. 162, 23 ALR. 1378 (1922), ‘wishes to adress the jury concerning the faa if would not be proper to deny this kept within proper Te capil eases ir oF not the defendant requests S.CL 708, 333 US, 690, 92 L.Ed. 986 ( time in which to prepare the case, Hawk v. Olson, 66 S.Ct 90 L.Ed 61 (1945). tn non-capital eases, ‘own selection, House v. Mayo, 08 5. 517, 324US. 42, 89 LEA thewring denied 65 S.Ct 680, 324 US, #85, 89 LEM 1435, be personally present when any esses Br the state must be person they mast be examined in his presence vy State, 54 Cr. 646, 114 SW. 138 SW. 1025 (1911). The privilege general testimony from being used against an accused, Seo eg, Dent v. Sit TTexApp. 102 (4884). Too, the depositions and having the evi