Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
Util is immeasurable
There is no real way of measuring happiness
Jonathan Glover, Philosopher, 1990 UTILITARIANISM AND ITS CRITICS, 3 Some of the objections to utilitarianism are practical. It is said to be unworkable. We can predict only some of the consequences of actions. We have no way of measureing happiness. We cannot say, for instance, that the birth of a child gives the parents three hundred and seven times the happiness they would get from a holiday in France. There are further difficulties about comparing the happiness of different people. The weighing of consequences seems more often a matter of vague intuition than of scientific calculation.
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
Util invalid
Utilitarianism is based on an over-simplified version of the world, invalidating it
Samuel Scheffler, Prof. of Philosophy, UC Berkeley, THE REJECTION OF CONSEQUENTIALISM, 1994, p. 3. Classical utilitarianism, which ranks states of affairs according to the amount of total satisfaction they contain, is the most familiar consequentialist view. But classical utilitarianism is widely thought to be too crude a theory. Although its defenders point with approval to its simplicity, critics charge that this simplicity is achieved at too high a cost. They argue that utilitarianism relies on implausible assumptions about human motivation, incorporates a strained and superficial view of the human good, and ignores a host of important considerations about justice, fairness, and the character of human agency. More generally, they accuse utilitarianism of relentless insensitivity to the nature of a person, and suggest that it has forfeited any serious claim to account for the complex and varied considerations that intrude on the moral life, and which give rise to the severest tests of our decency. Indeed, utilitarianism has gained a reputation for moral clumsiness that is unparalleled among ethical theories. Bernard Williams, writing that the simplemindedness of utilitarianism disqualifies it totally, suggests that [t]he day cannot be too far off in which we hear no more of it.
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
Util demoralizes
Utilitarian framework actually makes turns us into tools and takes away moral intent
Philip Pettit, Prof. of Philosophy at Australia National Univ., A COMPANION TO ETHICS, ed. by Peter Singer, 1991, p. 234. The idea behind this charge is that any consequentialist moral theory requires agents to change their deliberate habits in an objectionable fashion. They will have to calculate about every choice, it is said, identifying the different prognoses for every option, the value associated with each prognosis and the upshot of those various values for the value of the option. Doing this, they will be unable to recognize the tights of others as considerations that ought to constrain them without further thought of the consequences; they will be unable to acknowledge the special claims of those near and dear to them, claims that ought normally to brook no calculation: and they will be unable to mark distinctions between permissible options, obligatory options and options of supererogatory virtue. They will become moralistic computers, insensitive to all such nuances. F.H. Bradley made the point nicely in the last century, in Ethical Studies (j). 107). So far as my lights go, this is to make possible, to justify, even to encourage, an incessant practical casuistry; and that, it need scarcely be added, is the death of morality.
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
Util Dehums
Util allows to ignore any human identity of those deemed worthless in the big picture by our societal norms
Lilly-Marlene Russow, THE HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, May, 1990, p. S4. Despite its obvious appeal, classical utilitarianism has been subject to important criticisms. First, the method of summing up or averaging the good or harm for all concerned is often seen as failing to respect those affected as separate and distinct individuals. For instance, utilitarian theories seem to condone secretly killing someone who contributes no good to society, friends, or family in order to transplant her organs into four or five worthy but dying people. Moreover, hedonism seems too narrow as a full account of the good; after all, many people freely forgo pleasure to obtain other things they deem worthy of pursuit.
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
10
Util Bad
Alec Kerrigan Jupiter High School
10