0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
978 vues199 pages
Defendants request permission to file a brief in excess of twenty pages. This is in response to the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. The motion will ensure the Court's ability to consider Defendant's opposition to the extraordinary relief sought by Plaintiffs in full.
Defendants request permission to file a brief in excess of twenty pages. This is in response to the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. The motion will ensure the Court's ability to consider Defendant's opposition to the extraordinary relief sought by Plaintiffs in full.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Defendants request permission to file a brief in excess of twenty pages. This is in response to the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. The motion will ensure the Court's ability to consider Defendant's opposition to the extraordinary relief sought by Plaintiffs in full.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
SUFFOLK, ss. ‘SUPERIOR COURT
CA.NO. 11-4152
OCCUPY BOSTON,
KRISTOPHER MARTIN,
SASHA SAGAN, NOAH.
MCKENNA, and JENNIE
SEIDEWAND,
Plaintiff,
CITY OF BOSTON, CITY OF
OF BOSTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT, by and
‘through POLICE
COMMISSIONER EDWARD
DAVIS, and the ROSE.
FITZGERALD KENNEDY
GREENWAY CONSERVANCY,
INC.
Defendants.
es)
DEFENDANTS, CITY OF BOSTON AND CITY OF BOSTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MOTION FOR FILING FINE’ iF TWE}
PAGES
Pursuant to Superior Court Rule 9A(b)(4), counsel for Defendants City of Boston
and City of Boston Police Department, by and through Police Commissioner Edward
Davis (“Defendants”), request the Courts permission to file a brief in excess of twenty
pages in responding to the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and,
After a Hearing, a Preliminary Injunction,
[As suppor for this motion, Defendants state that a brief in excess of twenty pages
is necessary due tothe breadth of i
1s raised by the Plaintiffs in their Motion, which
include substanticl constitutional matters. Defendants can only adequately respond tothose issues by filing a brie in excess of twenty pages. The allowance ofthis motion will
also ensure the Court's ability to consider Defendant's opposition tothe extraordinary
relief sought by Plaintifsin Fl
CITY OF BOSTON,
By its attomeys:
William F. Sinnott
58796
iskeir, BBO #662034
Julie Cilla, BBO # 666080
Kevin Comridan, BBO # 662648,
Nicole N. Taub, BBO # 663517
Assistant Corporation Counsel
City of Boston Law Department
Room 615, City Hall
Boston, MA 02201
(617) 635-4034
Michael D. Riceiuti (BBO F350771)
Kelly K MeLaughlin(BBO#
K&L GATES LLP
State Stret Financial Center
(One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111-2950
(617) 261-3100
(617) 261-3175 (fax)
Michael Ricciuti@klgates.com
(CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE,
1, MichaetD. Ricciuti, hereby certify that a true copy of the AKow3 document was
setved upon Plaintiffs” counsel by hand delivery on November
ated: November29, 2011COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
SUFFOLK, ss. SUPERIOR COURT
C.A.NO. 11-4152
ee
OCCUPY BOSTON,
KRISTOPHER MARTIN,
SASHA SAGAN, NOAH
MCKENNA, and JENNIE,
SEIDEWAND,
Plaintft,
CITY OF BosTON, CITY OF
OF BOSTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT, by and
‘through POLICE
COMMISSIONER EDWARD.
DAVIS, and the ROSE
FITZGERALD KENNEDY
GREENWAY CONSERVANCY,
INC,
Defendants
——____
DEFENDANT CITY OF BOSTON'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW
IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS”
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
INTRODUCTION
‘The City of Boston strongly believes in and protects its citizens” and vistors” rights to
freedom of speech and peaceful assembly, consistent with he strong protection ofsuch speech in
the federal Bill of Rights and Massachusetts” Declaration of Rights. Such speech i a the core of
‘functioning democracy and atthe heart ofthe political culture in Boston, which has seen
Protest play a majorrole in political discourse inthis City since the founding ofthe Republic
"Nevertheless, “[nJotwithstanding its exalted position inthe pantheon of fundamental freedoms,
foe speech always must be balanced against the state's responsibility to preserve and protect