sy PLATO Parmenides ‘Translated by Mary Lourse Git and Paut RYAN Introduction by Magy Louise Git. Hackett Publishing Company, Ine. IndianapolistCambridgePte on as 3e7 26 Copyright 196 by Haat rabishing Company, ne All sights erred Pein in the United Sater of Ameren oe farther information, plane adres Hackett Pabishing Company, te PO. Box a7 Indimapais Indiana 46266-0057 (Cover design by Listeners fe Associates “Tet design by Dan Kin {brary of Congress Catalogingn-Pbleaton Data TPanwenids. Engh) ParmenudesPisto tana by May Louie Gil and Pl Ryan; snureducton by Mary Louse Cal Ince biographical elecee ISBN 087220958 all poper) ISBN 057220928. (pt alk pepe "Socal 2. Pamenides. 3. Ontdogy. 4 Zen o 5 ReasoningRasy works to 80, Daca work 0 st. Gi, Mary Loe, 1980 yan, Pal, 1928- Me HR ASGSSID 1995 arden sss ‘iP ‘Te paper used inthis pubation meets the minimum requirements of Amencan National Sense for fformaton Sones Perma ‘ence of Pape or Painted Libary Matera, ANS 29.8158, e Contents Preface Introduction ‘The Frames (1260-1278) PART 1 (1278-1372), Pamenides and Zeno (1273-128e) Soxrates’ Long Speech (286-1303) armen Critisns (1306-1342) 1 ‘Scope of Forms (30b-<) 2, Whole-Part Dilemma (130e-131e) 4. Langeness Regres (1323-6) 4, Forms Are Thoughts (132-0) 5, Likeness Regrese (152-1398) 6, Separation Argument (1333-134) ‘Teansition to Pat I (134e-1370) Why Are Foring Needed? (1346-1950) ‘The Bnerise (135-1362) Plan of the Deluctions (1364-b) [Amn ofthe Exercise (136b-<) ‘The Respondent (136-1370) PART I (137¢-166) The One ‘The Positive Hypothesis (137e and 182b-<) ‘The First Antnomy: Dedutions 1 (137e-1423) and 2 (142-1558) ‘One and Many (Deduction 2: Me 1453) keness and Unlikeness (Deduction 2: 147-1484) Appendix to Deductions 1 and 2 (155e-1876) “The One and the Others Deduction 3 (157b-159) Deduction 4 (1536-1600) SSR GEYN FG R SELOSE BREVRES Reve -16 Pamaons “Thucyies tory ofthe Peres War, Trans. by R. Warner, Har rmondsworth, 13 Vlasts, 195. “The Thi Man Argument in Plas Pamenide, hla Review 68. Rep with alder Allen (od) 198, m8 ——— 196, “Pts Theda’ Argument (Pum 1523-2 Text and Logie" Pipa Quart 19, 89 90. Rep Vs 173, (ed) WA. Pal: A Calton of Crit! Eage. Vol: Metapet ‘and Eps. Carden Cy, NY. 1973. Poe Sais, Penson Wiateriow-S. 196, “The Third Ms Conrbtion to Plte's Parlin ism” Mind 91, 38-57, Wein M6. V. 1877 “ed rr and the Argument at Photo 707- 1S Phrness 2, 191-25. ‘What, FC. 197. "Pas Mile Dishague and the Independence of atc.” loss Qrery 27 198-213 White, N. 1985, Pt: Soph Indionapas Wn, M, 1985. PlaoasPrmenis, Start ana Bern, Analysis of the Deductions in Part II Deduction 1 (13%e-142a}: If the one is one, what ae the conse ‘quences forthe one? Negative consequence, Hypothesis D.A: itis one 1374, 1 The one is ot many (1570) 2. The one is nota whole and doesn't have parts (1376-4). 53 The one doesnt have a beginning, middle, or end (137), 4. The one i unlimited (1374). [5 The one is without shape (1374-138). {6 The one as no lation (1380-b). ‘AL The one Is notin another (134), 1B. The one isnot intel (1380-6) 17, Tre ne is notin motion ora rest (138b-159). A. The one isnot ia motion (38-13%). () The one ts not altered (1380), {@) The one does not move spatially (138-13). a. Theome doesn’t spin in the same locaton (138-4). ', The one dows’ change plice (139). B. Tho one isnot af rest (1385-b) 8, Theone isnot the sine as or differen from another or itself (1396-9, A. The one isnot diferent from itself (190) 1B. The one is not the same as another (1396-0) CC. The one is aot different from another (15). . The one isnot the same as sel (138d-e) 9. The one fs not like or unlike another of Hse (199-140). A.The one isnot ike smother or itself (198-1409). 3, The one isnot unlike another oF self (140a-B). 10, The ane not equal or unequal to another oriself (140b-d) 11 The one isnot alder or younger than, or the same age 28, {self or another (L0e- 141). 'A. The one snot the same age as another or itself (1400),