Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 96

Structural Engineering Documents

Gnter Ramberger

Structural Bearings and Expansion Joints for Bridges

International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Association Internationale des Ponts et Charpentes Internationale Vereinigung fr Brckenbau und Hochbau


About the Author

Gnter RAMBERGER Born 1942 in Aspang, Austria, Gnter Ramberger received his civil engineering degree from the Technical University, Vienna, in 1966. He worked as an assistant to Prof. Dr.-lng. Peter Stein, Institute for Steel Structures, from 1967 to 1969 and received his doctor's degree in 1970 with a thesis on orthotropic plates. In 1970 he joined Hein, Lehmann AG, Dsseldorf, Germany, where he worked in the field of steel bridges, finally, as head of this department. He was involved in design, fabrication and erection of the following steel bridges: Oberkasseler Brcke, Dsseldorf, Franklinbrcke, Dsseldorf, Sderelbebrcke, Hamburg, Hammerbrookbrucke, Hamburg, Hochbrcke, Brunsbttel, and many others. Since 1981 he has been professor of Steel Structures at the Technical University, Vienna, and was Dean of the Faculty for Civil Engineering from 1984 to 1987. He has been a member of the Working Commission 2 of IABSE and is a member of several committees for the standardization of steel structures (CEN TC 250/SC3, ON).

Structural Engineering Documents

Gnter Ramberger

Structural Bearings and Expansion Joints for Bridges

International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Association Internationale des Ponts et Charpentes Internationale Vereinigung fr Brckenbau und Hochbau


Copyright 2002 by International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 3-85748-105-6 Printed in Switzerland Publisher: IABSE-AIPC-IVBH ETH Hnggerberg CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Phone: Int.+ 41-1-633 2647 Fax: Int.+ 41-1-633 1241 E-mail: secretariat@iabse.ethz.ch Web: http://www.iabse.ethz.ch

Dedicated to the commemoration of the late Prof. Dr. techn. Ferdinand Tschemmernegg, University of Innsbruck.

It is my hope that this treatise will serve as a textbook for students and as information for civil engineers involved in bridge construction. My intent was to give a short guideline on bearings and expansion joints for bridge designers and not to mention all the requirements for the manufacturers of such products. These requirements are usually covered by product guidelines, which vary between different countries. Not all the references are related to the content of this document. They are more or less a collection of relevant papers sometimes dealing with special problems. I express many thanks to Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ulrike Kuhlmann, University of Stuttgart, chairperson of Working Commission 2 of IABSE, who gave the impetus for this work; to her predecessor of the IABSE Commission, Prof. Dr. David A. Nethercot, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, for reviewing the manuscript, and Prof. Dr. Manfred Hirt, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, for his contributions and comments. I wish to thank J. S. Leendertz, Rijkswaterstaat, Zoetermeer; Eugen Brhwiler, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne; Prof. R. J. Dexter, University of Minnesota; G. Wolff, Reissner & Wolff, Wels; O. Schimetta , Amt der O Landesregierung, Linz; Prof. B. Johannsson, Lulea Tekniska Universitet, for amendments, corrections, remarks and comments. I thank also my assistant Dipl.-Ing. Jrgen Robra for his valuable contributions to the paper, especially for the sketches and drawings, and my secretaries Ulla Samm and Barbara Bastian for their expert typing of the manuscript. Finally, I would like to thank the IABSE for the publication of this Structural Engineering Document.

Vienna, April 2002

Gnter Ramberger

Page Blank In Original

Table of Contents
1. Bearings
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 Introduction The role of bearings General types of bearings and their movements The layout of bearings Calculation of bearing reactions and bearing movements Construction of bearings Materials for bearings Analysis and design of bearings Installation of bearings Inspection and maintenance Replacement of bearings Codes and standards References

7 7 7 9 16 19 29 33 37 38 39 41 42


Expansion Joints
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 Introduction The role of expansion joints Calculation of movements of expansion joints Construction of expansion joints Materials for expansion joints Analysis and design of expansion joints Installation of expansion joints Inspection and maintenance Replacement of expansion joints References

51 51 51 58 70 72 84 86 87 88

Page Blank In Original



All bridges are subjected to movements due to temperature expansion and elastic strains induced by various forces, especially due to traffic loads. In former times our bridges were built of stones, bricks or timber. Obviously, elongation and shortening occurred in those bridges, but the temperature gradients were small due to the high mass of the stone bridges. Timber bridges were small or had natural joints, so that the full elongation values were subdivided into the elongation of each part. On the other hand, the elongation and shortening of timber bridges due to change of moisture is often higher than that due to thermal actions. With the use of constructional steel and, later on, of reinforced and prestressed concrete, bridge bearings had to be used. The first bearings were rocker and roller bearings made of steel. Numerous rocker and roller bearings have operated effectively for more than a century. With the development of ageing-, ozone- and UV-radiation-resistant elastomers and plastics, new materials for bearings became available. Various types of bearings were developed with the advantage of an area load transmission in contrast to steel bearings with linear or point load transmission, where elastic analysis leads theoretically to infinite compression stresses. For the bearings the problems of motion in every direction and of load transmission were solved, but the problem of insufficient durability still exists. Whilst it is reasonable to assume the life of steel bearings to be the same as that of the bridge, the life of a bearing with elastomer or plastic parts can be shorter.


The role of bearings

The role of bearings is to transfer the bearing reaction from the superstructure to the substructure, fulfilling the design requirements concerning forces, displacements and rotations. The bearings should allow the displacements and rotations as required by the structural analysis with very low resistance during the whole lifetime. Thus, the bearings should withstand all external forces, thermal actions, air moisture changes and weather conditions of the region.


General types of bearings and their movements

Normally, reaction forces and the corresponding movements follow a dual principle a non zero bearing force corresponds to a zero movement and vice versa. An exception is given only by friction forces which are nearly constant during the movement, and by elastic restraint forces which are generally proportional to the displacement. Usually, the bearing forces are divided into vertical and horizontal components. Bearings for vertical forces normally allow rotations in one direction, some types in all directions. If they also transmit horizontal forces, usually vertical forces are combined.

1. Bearings

A special type of bearing transmits only horizontal forces, while allowing vertical displacements. The following table (Table 1.3-1) shows the common types of bearings, including the possible bearing forces and displacements. Friction and elastic restraint forces are not considered.
Nr Symbol Function 1 All translation fixed Rotation all round Horizontal movement in one direction Rotation all around Construction Point rocker bearing Pot bearing; Fixed elastomeric bearing; Spherical bearing Constr. point rocker sliding bearing; Constr. pot sliding bearing; Const. elastomeric bearing; Constr. spherical sliding bearing A Hx H y w ex ey Mx M y Mz x v ,

X X 0

0 0 X

0 X

X 0 0 0 0 X X X

Horizontal movement in all directions Rotation all round

Free point rocker bearing; Free pot sliding bearing; Free elastomeric bearing; Free spherical sliding bearing; Link bearing X with universal joints (tension and compression) Line rocker bearing Leaf bearing (tension and compression) Roller bearing; Link bearing (tension and compression); Constant line rocker sliding bearing Free rocker sliding bearing; Free roller bearing; Free link bearing Horizontal force bearing X

All translation fixed Rotation about one axis Horizontal movement in one direction Rotation about one axis Horizontal movement in all direction Rotation about one axis All horizontal transl. fixed Rotation all round Horizontal movement in one direction Rotation all round

X X X 0 0 0 0

0 (0) X

0 X

X (X) 0

X X 0

0 0 X

0 X

X 0

0 X

X (0) 0

X 0

0 (X) X

0 X 0 0 0 X X X

X 0 0

X 0

0 X X

Guide bearing X 0 0 X 0 X X 0 0 X 0 0 0 X X X

1.4 The layout of bearings

Table 1.3-1

1.4 The layout of bearings

1.4.1 General Bearings can be arranged at abutments and piers (fig.1.4.1-1; fig.1.4.1-2) under the webs of the main girders, under diaphragms (fig.1.4.1-3), and under the nodes of truss bracings. The webs and the diaphragms of concrete bridges have to be properly reinforced against tensile splitting; steel bridges need stiffeners in the direction of the bearing reactions to transfer the concentrated bearing loads to the superstructure and the substructure. Abutments and piers also have to be properly reinforced under the bearings against tensile splitting.

Fig. 1.4.1-1: Bearings at an abutment

Fig. 1.4.1-2: Bearings at a pier

Fig. 1.4.1-3: Bearing at a single pier


1. Bearings

The layout of the bearings should correspond to the structural analysis of the whole structure (super- and substructure together!). If the settlement and the deflection of the substructure can be neglected the structural analysis of the superstructure, including the bearings, can be separated from that of the substructure. Sometimes the model for the analysis, especially of the superstructure, will be simplified by assuming the following: bearings are situated directly on the neutral axis of the girder (fig.1.4.1-6), the motion of the bearings occurs without restraint, bearings have no clearance, etc. In this case we must consider the correct system (fig.1.4.1-5) at least for the design of the bearings and take into account the influence of the simplifications on the structure.

Fig.1.4.1-4: Reality

Fig. 1.4.1-5: Correct system

Fig.1.4.1-6: Simplified system On the abutments or separating piers it is normal to use at least two vertical bearings to avoid torsional rotations. At intermediate piers one or more vertical bearings may be used. If more than one bearing is used the rotational displacement at the pier is restrained. More than three vertical supports of the superstructure lead to statically-indeterminate bearing conditions, but even the simplest bridge has at least four vertical bearings. If the torsional stiffness of the superstructure is low (e.g. open cross sections) it may be neglected and the layout with four bearings becomes isostatic. If the torsional stiffness is not negligible (e.g. box girders) we have to take it into account for the structural analysis, especially for skewed and curved bridges. On a bridge with n > 3 vertical supports, n - 3 bearing reactions can be chosen freely within a reasonable bandwidth. This possibility can be used to prestress the superstructure and to distribute the bearing reactions as desired. If the bearings are situated (nearly) in a plane we need at least one horizontally fixed and one horizontally moveable bearing. The moving direction must not be orthogonal

1.4 The layout of bearings


to the polar line from the fixed to the moveable bearing. If more than two bearings in the horizontal direction are necessary, the basic principle should be that an overall uniform extension, caused by temperature or shrinkage, shall be possible without restraint. In general, there are two possibilities for the arrangement of the bearings: a) arrangement in a horizontal position (fig.1.4.1 -7) b) arrangement in a position parallel to the road or rail surface (fig.1.4.1-8).

Fig. 1.4.1-7: Horizontal arrangement of the bearings (case a)

Fig. 1.4.1-8: Inclined arrangement of the bearings (case b) Case a) has the advantage that only vertical bearing reactions and no permanent horizontal reactions result from vertical loads, but it has the disadvantage that bridges with inclined gradients require a step at the expansion joint due to movements in the superstructure. The greater the elongation or shortening, the greater the step required. Case b) has the advantage that the slope of the expansion joint is independent of the movement of the bridge. The inclination of the surface of support gives the direction of the normal force. Besides vertical reaction forces, also horizontal reaction forces result from vertical loads. Permanent horizontal actions can lead to a displacement by creep of the concrete and the soil and, thus, to crooked piers.


1. Bearings

1.4.2 The layout for different types of bridges For single span girders the layout of the bearings is straightforward. One fixed and one moveable bearing is provided on each abutment, all other bearings are just vertical supports, moveable in any horizontal direction. For wide bridges the horizontally fixed bearings are located in or near the bridge axis. Formerly, the "classical" arrangement of the bearings for a bridge with two main girders consisted of one fixed and one lengthwise moveable bearing at one abutment and one lengthwise moveable and one free bearing at the other abutment (fig.1.4.2-1). This layout has the advantage that longitudinal horizontal forces (braking and traction forces) can be distributed into the two bearings at the abutment, but it has the disadvantage that horizontal forces in the cross direction (wind) and temperature differences cause horizontal restraint forces, provided that bearings have no clearance on the abutments. The author prefers the statically determinate system with only one lengthwise restrained bearing at the abutment concerned because the actual clearance of a bearing is not determinable in reality (fig.1.4.2-2).


"Classical" layout

Fig.1.4.2-2: Horizontally statically determinate system (better than classical layout)

Fig.1.4.2-3: System with separated vertical and horizontal bearings (statically determinate system)

1.4 The layout of bearings


For skewed or horizontally curved single span bridges we have to decide whether the horizontal force should be combined with the higher or with the lower vertical reaction force. For all bearing constructions it is easier to transfer horizontal forces in combination with a high vertical force. In this case the resultant force stays nearer to the centre, its angle to the vertical is smaller and leads to smaller bending moments in suband superstructure (fig.1.4.2-4).

Fig.1.4.2-4: Inclination of the resultant force Thus, the horizontally constrained bearings for skewed bridges should be placed at the obtuse corners of the bridge, for curved bridges at the outer side (fig.1.4.2-5).

Fig. 1.4.2-5: Skewed bridge

Fig. 1.4.2-6: Layout for continuous girders


1. Bearings

For straight continuous girders normally two bearings are used at every abutment and pier. If the torsional stiffness is high (box girder) the intermediate piers can be reduced to a round column with one bearing on the axis under the diaphragm. Constrained bearings in the cross direction are the rule at all piers. If the horizontal bending stiffness is very high we can transfer the horizontal forces only at the abutments. The same considerations are suitable also for skewed and curved bridges (fig.1.4.2-6). Bearings for horizontal forces and guide bearings which transfer only horizontal forces may be used in combination with leaf or link bearings which cannot transmit horizontal forces. The movement of an expansion joint must be linked by a guide like a constraint bearing. The main movement of an expansion joint should be in the axis of the traffic way. Generally, this direction does not coincide with the direction of the polar line from the fixed bearing to the moveable bearing at the abutment (fig.1.4.2-7). If all other bearings have the same angle between the polar line and the moving direction there results a layout of the bearings with no restraints on uniform elongation or shortening (e.g. caused by thermal actions or shrinkage), as shown below (fig.1.4.2-8).

Fig.1.4.2-7: Layout for curved bridges

Fig.1.4.2-8: Layout for curved continuous girders (no constraint under overall temperature)

Fig.1.4.2-9: Geometrical situation

1.4 The layout of bearings


The elongation is

proportional elongation

The rotation is

For 1 = , the bridge simply rotates as a rigid body without constraint. One special case of this general rule is well known: the bearings are moveable in the direction of the polar lines with = 0 (fig.1.4.2-10). However, this layout has the disadvantage that generally the main movement of the joint does not coincide with the movement of the bearing.

Fig. 1.4.2-10: Special case with a = 0

1.4.3 Special bearing conditions, advice etc. It is important to note that the layout of the bearings has a great influence on the struc tural system. The above mentioned arrangements of bearings are typical for average bridges. The following examples show some special effects which have to be consid ered for the design of bridges and bearings. These examples do not lay claim to com pleteness. a) The already mentioned bearing layout, consisting of one bearing fixed in all sliding directions and one fixed lengthwise at one abutment, leads to high constraint forces not only under horizontal but also under eccentric vertical loading (fig.1.4.3-1). It is interesting that this eccentric loading has no prying effect if the bearings are situated directly on the neutral axis of the girder. This effect results only from the (small) eccentricity of the bearing under the lower flange.


1. Bearings

Fig.1.4.3-1: Prying effect due to a eccentric loading b) A similar situation occurs for a continuous girder with chequer pattern loading.

Fig.1.4.3-2: Prying effect due to chequer pattern loading c) It is not generally known that a skewed bridge with horizontally fixed bearings only in one line exhibits the same effect under vertical loading, as the following figure shows:

Fig. 1.4.3-3: Prying forces for a skewed bridge with vertical loading Similar effects can occur for curved bridges. For the correct analysis of the bearing reactions it is always necessary to model the bearings at the very point where they are actually situated, and in combination with the substructure. The deflection of the substructure can influence the constraint bearing reactions significantly.


Calculation of bearing reactions and bearing movements

1.5.1 Actions According to Eurocode 1 (ENV 1991) the actions can be subdivided into: - permanent actions, - variable actions, - extraordinary actions.

1.5 Calculation of bearing reactions and bearing movements


The bridge should take up the desired shape under all permanent loads, at the average temperature (+10C in most of the European countries) and, if time-dependant displacements occur, at the time t = , at which time all moveable bearings should be in the zero adjustment (null position). Variable actions and extraordinary actions lead to deviation from this form. Variable actions to consider are: - traffic loads, considering the applicable dynamic coefficients - loads due to traffic loads, i.e. nosing forces centrifugal forces braking forces traction forces - wind loads wind on construction wind on traffic loads - settlements of abutments and piers - thermal actions uniform temperature vertical temperature gradient horizontal temperature gradient temperature differences between individual parts of the bridge (e.g. stay cables, pylon and stiffening girder) - creep and shrinkage of concrete Extraordinary actions to consider are: - earthquake actions - vehicle impact - derailment - rupture of the conductor line others

1.5.2 Bearing reactions For permanent actions such as self-weight of the construction, dead load and prestressing, the bearing reactions can be calculated as one load case. For the analysis of the bearings it is necessary to consider different combinations of the bearing reactions: - maximum vertical force and the adjacent horizontal force, - minimum vertical force and the adjacent maximum horizontal force, - maximum horizontal force and the adjacent maximum vertical force, - maximum horizontal force and the adjacent minimum vertical force. The simplest way to obtain these combinations is to calculate the variable actions, especially the traffic load, according to the influence line. One should bear in mind that horizontal actions such as centrifugal forces or braking forces are proportional to the vertical traffic load, but other loads, such as wind or traffic or traction forces for railways, are not.


1. Bearings

To obtain the extreme bearing reaction it is necessary to consider that all bridges are three-dimensional and not merely plane systems. The influence lines (influence surfaces) of the bearing reactions can be found as the displacement curves (displacement surfaces) of the system, due to unit displacements = 1 or ( = 1, acting at the position and in the direction of the required force. If these analyses are performed on a three dimensional model, the definitive influence area will result directly (fig.1.5.2-1; fig.1.5.2-2). If plane models are used for the analyses, special care is necessary, particularly with continuous girders with open or box sec tions. The following examples demonstrate the difference:

Fig. 1.5.2-1: Influence area for the vertical bearing reaction A, box section.

Fig.1.5.2-2: Influence area for the vertical bearing reaction A, open section.

1.5.3 Bearing displacements As already mentioned, the zero adjustment (null position) of every bearing has to be defined. The displacements are measured from that position. Thus, for concrete and composite bridges it is usual to consider displacements under time-dependent actions such as creep and shrinkage from the time of installation of the bearing to the time de fined for the null position (normally t = ), from which position the displacements due to variable actions are measured. To obtain the maximum displacements and rotations, again we can use influence lines. The influence line of a displacement can be calculated as the displacement curve due to the corresponding unit force P = 1. To take into account the imperfections due to installation, the temperature difference for the calculation of bearing displacements should be assumed higher than for the structural analysis of the bridge, or some additional displacement should be consi dered.

1.6 Construction of bearings



Construction of bearings
Standard type
Reinforced elastomeric bearing

Elastomeric bearing with fixing device

Anchored elast. bearing

all translations fixed

movement in one dir.

Fixed bearing

Uni-directional guided

Multi-directional non-guided

Pot bearing

Free pot sliding bearing

Constr. pot sliding bearing

Free spherical bearing

Fixed spherical bearing

Constr. spherical bearing

Point rocker bearing

Free point rocker bearing

Constr. point rocker bearing

Line rocker bearing

Roller bearing

Leaf bearing

Link bearing

Link bearing with universal (cardan) joints

Horizontal force bearing

Guide bearing

Fig. 1.6-1 gives an overview for the most common bearings.


1. Bearings

1.6.1 Elastomeric bearings Elastomeric bearings are the simplest types of bearings. In the basic mode they con sist merely of an elastomeric block (usually rectangular or round). The elastomeric works as a soft part between sub- and superstructure and allows movements in all di rections by elastic displacements or rotations. Under vertical loads the elastic block bulges, leading to vertical displacements. A solution to this problem was found by re inforcing the elastic block by thin horizontal steel plates, vulcanized to the elastomer (fig.1.6.1-1). The reinforcing plates prevent the block from bulging, thus leading to very small vertical displacements, but they do not hinder horizontal displacements in every direction and also allow small rotations in all directions. Every displacement and rotation leads to restraining forces and moments which have to be taken into account on the whole structure. These restraining forces are possible if the friction between bearing and sub- and su perstructure is sufficient. The friction forces F depend on the compressive force C and the friction coefficient , with F = C . If displacements take place under a small compressive force, sliding between bearing and sub- or superstructure can occur. To avoid this it is necessary to use elastomeric bearings with resistance to sliding. This can be achieved by applying vulcanized plates on the bottom and on the top of the bearing, which can be connected to the sub- and superstructure by bolts, pins or ap propriate shapes (fig.1.6.1-2).

Fig.1.6.1-1: Elastomeric bearing (unanchored) Smaller, short time, horizontal forces can be transmitted by the restraining forces. If these forces are higher or if they are permanent loads a restraining steel construction is required. In these case the elastomeric bearing transmits the vertical force and allows rotations, while horizontal forces in one or two directions are transmitted by the steel construction (fig.1.6.1-3 ; fig.1.6.1-4).

Fig.1.6.1-2: Elastomeric bearing (anchored)

1.6 Construction of bearings


Fig.1.6.1-3: Elastomeric bearing constraint Combination: elastomeric bearing and steel construction fixed in one direction.

Fig.1.6.1-4: Fixed elastomeric bearing Combination: elastomeric bearing and steel construction fixed in two directions. 1.6.2 Steel bearings Steel bearings are the oldest type of bearings. They have been used for more than 100 years. The principle is simple: a flat plate rolls on another steel plate with a curved surface. If this surface is part of a sphere, theoretically we obtain a point tangency. If this surface is part of a cylinder, theoretically we obtain a linear tangency. In the first case we speak of point rocker bearings, in the second case of line rocker bearings. These bearings allow rotations in all or in one direction, but they do not allow displacements (fig.1.6.2-1; fig.1.6.2-4). Under minimal vertical reactions in combination with horizontal loads point rocker bearings and line rocker bearings can exhibit damage of their connections, because of tension. In combination with sliding elements these bearings are very sensitive to this phenomenon, and it causes partial uplift and excessive wear as a result. Linear tangencies can be found also in roller bearings consisting of a roll and a lower and an upper plate (fig.1.6.2-5). These bearings allow rotations in one direction and displacements in one direction. The problem with these bearings is a point or linear concentration of the bearing force, which theoretically leads to infinite stresses. In 1881, the physicist Heinrich Hertz found the solution of this problem: caused by the elastic deformation the theoretical point of tangency yields to a circle, the theoretical line of tangency yields to a rectangle. The infinite stresses decrease to high but finite stresses, the so called Hertz compression stresses over a very small contact zone. If the radius of the sphere or of the cylinder decreases the Hertz stresses increase. From the local stress concentration the stresses have to be distributed to the contact zones between bearing and sub- and superstructure. Therefore, steel bearings normally need thicker plates for the stress distribution than other types of bearings which transfer the bearing reactions over an area.


1. Bearings

Point rocker bearings are used for bearing reactions in the range 500 and 2500 kN, line rocker bearings and roller bearings for loads in the range 200 and 20 000 kN.

Fig.1.6.2-1: Fixed point rocker bearing

Fig.1.6.2-2: Point rocker bearing constraint in one direction

Fig.1.6.2-3: Free point rocker bearing

Fig.1.6.2-4: Line rocker bearing

1.6 Construction of bearings


Fig.1.6.2-5: Roller bearing (left side without guide rail; right side with guide rail) The contact zones of steel bearings cannot be protected against corrosion. Therefore corrosion-resistant layers of high alloyed steel should be used for the contact areas. This can be done by building up a surface by forging or by welding. Between the mild steel and the hardened high alloyed steel of the surface there should be a welded or forged tough buffer zone. The thickness (in mm) of the hardened layer both on the roller (radius R in mm) and of the plate should be t 0,14 R - 2. 1.6.3 Pot bearings These bearings were invented in the 1950s. They combine the two desirable properties: rotation capacity with a very small resistance and transmission of the bearing reaction over a defined area. The pot bearing consists of a steel pot, filled with an elastomeric disc and a lid or a piston to the top (fig.1.6.3-1). When subjected to high compression forces, the unreinforced elastomeric disc behaves similarly to a liquid. Rotations can occur due to the nearly constant volume of the elastomer (v = 0,5). Of great importance is the sealing between the elastomeric pad and the lid: if this sealing has a defect the elastomeric pad escapes like a viscous liquid. The standard type of pot bearing allows only rotation (fig.1.6.3-2). Vertical forces are transmitted to the pad, horizontal forces from the lid to the pot. To release one sliding direction, an additional construction becomes necessary (fig.1.6.3-3 and fig.1.6.3-5). This sliding construction consists of three components: a polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) disc, a surface of polished stainless steel connected to a sliding plate of structural steel and lubrication grease. PTFE is a plastic with high mechanical and chemical resistance, great toughness and very small friction when combined with polished stainless steel. The PTFE disc is 5 to 6 mm thick, where half a thickness is enclosed by the lid. This disc has small round pockets on the surface for the lubrication grease (normally silicon grease) to reduce friction and wearing. To constrain the movement in one direction an additional guide is used for the lid. This guiding device allows movements in only one direction (fig.1.6.3-3). Pot bearings are used for vertical bearing forces from 1000 kN up to 100 000 kN. Depending on the standard applied the allowable compression between lid and elas-


1. Bearings

tomeric pad should not exceed 4.0 kN/cm2. The allowable compression for the PTFE is 3 kN/cm2 for permanent loads and 4.5 kN/cm2 for short term loads (traffic, wind etc.). Pot bearings have the advantage of a very high vertical stiffness (nearly incompressible elastomeric part). It is comparatively independent of the size of bearing and the applied load. This characteristic is important for the bearing of high velocity railway bridges. Bearings with low vertical stiffness can lead to damage of the rails.

Centre of rotation

Elastomere disc Lid Sealing Pot - wall Pot - bottom

Fig.1.6.3-1: Function of a pot bearing

Fig.1.6.3-2: Fixed pot bearing

Fig.1.6.3-3: Pot bearing constraint in one direction

1.6 Construction of bearings

Anchoring plate Sliding plate Polished stainless steel PTFE (Polytetrafiuorethylen) Lid Pot-wall Sealing Elastomere disc Pot - bottom


Fig.1.6.3-4: Members of a pot bearing

Fig. 1.6.3-5: Free pot bearing 1.6.4 Spherical bearings The basic type of spherical bearing consists of three main parts: the pan, the part of a sphere and the upper plate made of constructional steel (fig.1.6.4-1). To allow displacements between the parts, sliding surfaces are necessary. The pan has a PTFE plate on the upper surface, the part of the sphere has a chrome-plated polished surface on the underface and a PTFE plate also on the upper surface, and the upper plate has a polished stainless steel plate on the underface. The PTFE plates are chambered over half the thickness and have lubrication pockets with silicon grease, like the sliding plates for pot bearings. The friction resistance of the sliding parts causes reaction moments due to rotations. They must be taken into account to consider additional design stresses of the bearing material. The vertical bearing reaction is transferred over the compressed areas of the PTFE. The basic model is a moveable bearing (fig.1.6.4-4). To constrain horizontal displacements an additional construction to connect the upper plate with the pan becomes necessary (fig.1.6.4-2; fig.1.6.4-3). British and Italian bearings have one sliding plane only and a deeper concave part to take over horizontal forces (fig.1.6.4-5). The construction must be checked for uplift and exceeding the stresses in the contact area. In the bearings with two sliding planes the centre of rotation is between the contact areas of the sliding surfaces, whereas in Italian and British bearings it is somewhere in the bridge structure or in the pier or the abutment.


1. Bearings

Like pot bearings, spherical bearings are used for vertical forces in the range of 1000 to 100 000 kN.

Polished stainless steel

Sliding plate PTFE


Part of sphere Chrome plated polished surface

Fig.1.6.4-1: Members of a spherical bearing

Fig.1.6.4-2: Fix spherical bearing

Fig.1.6.4-3: Spherical bearing constraint in one direction

Fig.1.6.4-4: Free spherical bearing

1.6 Construction of bearings


Fig.1.6.4-5: Italian and British spherical bearing (one sliding surface) 1.6.5 Leaf and link bearings All the above mentioned bearings are able to transfer compression forces. If tensile forces as well as compressive forces must be transferred, leaf and link bearings are used. These bearings can only transmit forces in the direction of the leaf. To transfer forces in the crosswise direction, separate bearings must be used. A leaf bearing consists of a foot plate, one or two lower leafs with pin holes and two or one upper leaf with foot plate and pin holes, connected by a pin. Leaf bearings al low free rotation in one direction. Pin and pin holes must have a fit less than 0.3 mm, as in cases of greater slackness and changing forces the pin will punch the hole. Pin plate and pin should be of different types of steel to avoid seizure. Pin plates are made of structural steel, pins often of tempered steel. For link bearings a pendulum is linked to the foot leaf and to the upper leaf by pins. Link bearings allow rotation and displacement in one direction. For pin holes and pins the same rules apply as given for leaf bearings. Link bearings with universal (Cardan) joints are used only in special cases. They allow rotation and displacement in all directions. Displacements 8 of link bearings are always combined with a small displacement V in the perpendicular direction. V = with R equal to the distance between the

axes of the pins. Therefore this distance should not be too small. 1.6.6 Disc bearings Disc bearings were introduced in the late 1960s. The vertical loads are transferred by an elastomeric disc made of polyether-urethane polymer. In contrast to a pot bearing a transverse extension of the elastomeric disc is possible. Bearing capacity and func tioning is comparable with an elastomeric bearing. Rotations around the horizontal axis are transferred by differential deflection of the disc. The rotations cause a shift of the axis of the load from the centre of bearing, which must be considered in the design. Horizontal forces are transferred by a shear-restriction device which allows vertical deformation and rotation. The basic type is a fixed bearing. Free bearings are con structed by additional sliding elements and (if necessary) guiding systems.


1. Bearings

top plate

bearing assembly

base plate

Fig.1.6.6-1: Fixed bearing

top plate

bearing assembly

base plate

Fig.1.6.6-2: Uni-directional guided

top plate

bearing assembly

base plate

Fig.1.6.6-3: Multi-directional non-guided

1.7 Materials for bearings



Materials for bearings

1.7.1 Steel Structural steel Structural steel is used for all parts of bearings which are not under extraordinary local stress or do not require special properties against corrosion. Structural steel for bearings can be: - Non-alloy structural steels according to EN 10025 - Fine-grained structural steels according to EN 10113 - Quenched and tempered steels according to EN 10082 Eurocode 3 may be used for the design of all bearing components made from structural steel according to EN 10025 and EN 10113 and for all connections (bolts, welds etc.). Quenched and tempered steels are used mostly for non-welded parts under high pressure (parts with Hertz compression, bolts of leaf and link bearings). In contact areas with Hertz compression layers of corrosion-resistant hard steel can be applied by forging or by welding. In the case of hard-surface welding a tough intermediate (puffer) layer must be welded between the steel and the hard-surface. Stainless steel Stainless steel according to EURONORM 88-2 or ISO 683 can also be used for bearings. For design one should use EC 3, part 1-4. Concerning stainless steel for sliding plates see 1.7.3. 1.7.2 Elastomeric parts Elastomeric parts of bearings consist normally of natural or artificial (chloropren) rubber (NR or CR, respectively). Artificial rubber has the same good properties as natural rubber, and in addition it has a higher resistance against ozone, ultraviolet radiation and ageing and is more rigid. The characteristic mechanical property is the shear modulus G between 0.7 and 1.15 N/mm2 at room temperature, decreasing with increasing temperature. When undergoing stress changes the volume of rubber is nearly constant. So we have a Poisson's ratio v = 0.5 and a Young's modulus of elasticity E = 2 (1+v) G 3 G. The fracture strain of rubber lies between 250 % and 500 %. Rubber creeps under stress by up to 50 % of the elastic strain, but creeping ends within some days or weeks. Rubber does not break under compression, it can only break under tensile or shear stresses. Compressing a rubber pad changes its shape. The changing of the shape depends on the possibility of displacement at the compressed areas. If the compressed areas are fixed to a rigid surface, the displacement remains small. Thus we obtain the inequality 1 > 2 > 3 (fig. 1.7.2-1).

Fig. 1.7.2-1: Vertical displacements depending on the lateral expansion


1. Bearings

Fig. 1.7.2-2: Stress distribution If the surface of the rubber is fixed to a rigid body shear stresses develop between the two surfaces under compression (fig.1.7.2-2). Under compression we obtain a virtual modulus of elasticity Ei compr which depends not only on the shear modulus G but also on the thickness of the part between two plates. For rectangular parts a good approximation for Ei compr is given by

The maximum stresses under compression between two rigid bodies are

For bending, the effective modulus of elasticity Ei bending is lower than Ei compr because we obtain a compression in two half waves under a constant rotation angle a. If both halves develop a constant displacement, the virtual modulus of elasticity would be the

1.7 Materials for bearings


the maximum is not in the middle of one half but nearer the outer side; thus we finally obtain: following approximate formula: This is described very well by the

Under the rotation a we obtain a curvature and a restraining moment

Fig. 1.7.2-3: Rotation - restraining moment

Fig.1.7.2-4: Displacement - restraining forces 1.7.3 Sliding elements For sliding elements in constructional bearings it is normal to use PTFE, also known by the registered trade names Teflon and Hostaflon. PTFE is a so called thermoplast. For bearings it is used in the original (virgin) condition, i. e. not sintered and without fillers. As a counterpart to this rather soft material polished stainless steel plates are normally used, and sometimes acetal resin plates or hardened chromium-plated steel plates. Chromium-plated steel plates are not resistant to fluorine ions and are rather prone to corrosion than stainless steel plates. They are allowed for convex elements only. The combination of a soft and a hard part has the advantage that there is no danger of cold welding which can occur on polished metal or plastic surfaces under high pressure. To minimise the friction silicon grease should be used to provide lubrication. To keep this grease between the two surfaces the PTFE has lubricant pockets on its surface, so that a permanent lubrication takes place over several years. The PTFE plates for bearings are normally 5 to 6 mm thick, the depth of lubricant pockets is 2 mm. Un-


1. Bearings

der pressure the PTFE yields. To keep the PTFE in the desired shape it is necessary to keep about half the thickness in a chamber with sharp edges. Over the sharp edges we obtain a small bulge. It is also possible to glue PTFE to a steel surface. In this case the PTFE is about 2.5 mm thick. The friction coefficient increases with decreasing temperature and with decreasing compression. The static friction coefficient (first movement) is higher than the dynamic coefficient. After movement has taken place the dynamic friction coefficient remains at this value and returns to the static value after a few hours. This might depend on the orientation of the large polymer molecules; during movement they are orientated into the direction of motion within a very thin surface layer. When the motion is stopped, the orientation is lost within a few hours. Fig. 1.7.3-1 shows the design values of the friction coefficient d between PTFE and stainless steel, depending on the compression force (EN 1337-2).

Fig.1.7.3-1: Friction coefficient depending on the compression force The design value of the ultimate compression load is maximum temperature of the bearing. The wearing of the PTFE depends on a) the product of compression and velocity of the displacement b) the total amount of sliding during the life-time c) the lubrication of the surface (a loss of lubrication leads to extremely high wearing) d) the roughness and the hardness of the stainless steel surface e) the contact pressure near the edge of PTFE (ironing effect)

1.8 Analysis and design of bearings


For slow movements caused by thermal actions we obtain long sliding movements but at a low velocity. Quick movements caused by traffic loads have short sliding move ments but they occur at high velocity. Wearing is mostly caused by the second case. For the stainless steel plate, austenitic steel X6CrNiMol7122 according to EURONORM 88-2, surface n (IIIc), should be used. The stainless steel plate must cover the PTFE plate completely in all situations. The thickness of the plate should be at least of 1.5 mm. The connection to the carrying plate of mild steel can be welded or glued. For 2.5 mm thick plates the connection can be riveted or bolted.


Analysis and design of bearings

1.8.1 Hertz compression For the design of bearings the following problems should be addressed: compression between two spherical bodies, compression between a spherical and a flat body, com pression between two cylindrical bodies, compression between a cylindrical and a flat body along a generator line. As already mentioned, Heinrich Hertz obtained the solu tion under the following assumptions (1881): 1. The two bodies consist of isotropic, homogeneous and infinitely elastic materials. 2. Only normal stresses (no shear stresses) occur at the contact areas. 3. The radius (width) of the contact areas is small compared with the radii of the involved bodies. Hertz found the following maximum compression stresses max and widths b on the contact areas: Spherical body on spherical body

Cylindrical body on cylindrical body


1. Bearings

Fig. 1.8.1-la: A rrangement of the radii

Fig. 1.8.1-lb: A rrangement of the radii

F 1 r 1 ,r 2 E v max a b

bearing reaction length of the cylinder radii of the bodies in contact Fig. 1.8.1-2: Stress distribution Young's modulus Poisson's ratio (v = 0.3 for steel) maximum normal stress at the contact area half the width of the contact zone

For the usual rocker or roller bearings the max beneath the vertical bearing reaction greatly exceeds the material yield strength (fig.1.8.1-2). However, at the contact zone we have not only vertical but also horizontal compression stresses. According to the von Mises criterion the comparison stress and yielding begins when v reaches the material yield strength fy. In the present three-dimensional compression regime, v will be less than 1 and yielding will not begin until 1 = fy. On the other hand, the maximum strain does not occur at the surface in the middle of the compression zone, so that the hardness of the surface is not the only criterion for the assessment of Hertz compression. EN 1337-4 - roller bearings - gives for the design line load pd of a roller bearing

fu tensile strength of the material R radius of the cylinder Ed design value of the modulus of elasticity

1.8 Analysis and design of bearings


Compared to Hertz's formula with max d =0.418 we find

EN 1337-6 - rocker bearings - gives for the design load F z . d of a point rocker bearing (sphere against plane surface) Compared to Hertz's formula with m a x d =0.388 we find

For cylindrical rocker bearings the same formulae as for roller bearings are used. 1.8.2 Pin and pin plate for leaf and link bearings A special problem of all leaf and link bearings concerns the design of the pin and the pin plate. Eurocode 3, part 1-1, gives simple but satisfactory design rules. The design values of the shear force and the bending moment for the pin can be found using the simple model of distributing the force of each pin plate uniformly over the pin.

Fig. 1.8.2-1: Load distribution to the pin In the case of fig. 1.8.2-1 we obtain the shear force and the bending moment according to fig. 1.8.2-2 and fig. 1.8.2-3.


1. Bearings

Fig. 1.8.2-2: Shear force

Fig.1.8.2-3: Bending moment For normal bridge bearings we have: The design values for the resistances are

The combination of shear and bending has to fulfil the inequality

In this inequality, the central pin plate is controlling. The bearing resistance of plate (thickness t and yield strength fy) and pin is: Fb,Rd = 1.5 t d f y /Y Mp fyp field strength of the pin fup tensile strength of the pin YMp = 1.25 according to EC 3-1-1 The bearing capacity of the pin plate at the hole is achieved under one of the following conditions (EC 3-1-1 gives two possibilities):

1.9 Installation of bearings


a) Depending on the pin plate thickness t: t = min (2a, b),

b) Depending on the geometry of the pin plate:


Installation of bearings

Concerning the installation of bearings, the need for a later simple replacement must be taken into account. So it should be common practice to put every bearing between a lower and an upper steel cover plate. These cover plates are anchored or connected both with the substructure and the superstructure. These cover plates are connected to the bearings during the installation but remain fixed to the structure while the bearings are replaced (fig.1.9-1). Thus, the connection between bearing and cover plates should be constructed in order to allow a simple release. Bolted connections are often used but after many years often the bolts can hardly be unscrewed. According to the author's experience, fastening the bearings with small fillet welds that can be ground off and remade during the replacement process is simpler.

cover plate mortar bedding bearing cover plate

Fig. 1.9-1: Fixing of a bearing Generally, bearings should not be built directly on the construction beneath. To guarantee that the area below a bearing is fully sealed a layer of mortar or of a similar product is used. So the height of the bridge at the abutments or piers can be adapted easily and very exactly. It is useful to fix the bearing to the bridge so that there is no clearance at the upper plate and to adjust the bridge by hydraulic jacks. In this situation the


1. Bearings

bearings should be adjusted exactly. Thus, the lower plate will get exactly the desired inclination (horizontal or parallel to the gradient, see fig.1.9-1) and all moveable bearings will have the desired pre-adjustment, which depends on the temperature of the bridge and the expected shrinkage and creep. The installation of the bearings should be done early in the morning when the bridge has a (nearly) constant temperature. The designer has to provide a table with the pre-adjustment of every bearing depending on the measured bridge temperature. For good functioning, careful handling of the bearings during installation is very important. The bearings must be kept free of dirt, mortar, water and dust, especially from all moving parts. Many bearings, such as pot bearings and spherical bearings, are protected against dust by rubber bulges, but others are not protected at all. These have to be cleaned to remove mortar and sand after the installation. The gap between the lower plate of the bearing and the substructure is normally 3 to 5 cm thick and must be completely filled with a mortar bedding. This can be done in different ways: - by a fresh mortar bedding, chambered in the centre where the bearing is set. The excess of mortar will come out on all sides and must be removed. - by a special joint filling mortar which must be mixed in a pan type concrete mixer with a precise quantity of water. This mortar is liquid at first and should be poured in a formwork around the bearing only from one side, so that the air can escape on the other side. The special mortar fills the gap without air bubbles, it sets and hardens very quickly so that after one day the mortar bedding can be fully loaded and the formwork removed. If the gap is less than 1 cm a two-component epoxy resin should be used instead of mortar. Initially this resin is a lighter fluid than mortar, thus completely filling even very small gaps. - by boxing up earth-damp mortar in the gap with a wooden stick also from one side to avoid air bubbles. This method will be difficult for the lower plates with a short side larger than half a metre. All mortars should be non-shrinking.


Inspection and maintenance

Visual tests of all bearings should be done by qualified personnel at regular intervals. The following properties of the bearings have to be checked: a) sufficient ability to allow movement, taking into account the temperature of the superstructure b) correct positioning of the bearings themselves and of parts of the bearing relative to each other c) uncontrolled movement of the bearing d) fracture, cracks and deformations of parts of the bearings e) cracks in the bedding or in adjacent parts of sub- and superstructure f) condition of the anchorage g) condition of sliding or rolling surfaces h) condition of the anticorrosive protection, against dust, and of the sealings. For the different types of bearings the following checks are of importance:

1.11 Replacement of bearings


Elastomeric bearings: Displacements and rotations, cracks in the elastomer. Roller and rocker bearings: Displacements and rotations, adjustment of the guiding device, no gap in the contact line. Pot bearings: Sufficient mesh of the lid in the pot, tight sealing of the elastomer in the pot (if the sealing has a defect, the elastomer comes out like a pancake!) Sliding devices - PTFE and stainless steel: Thickness of the PTFE, clean surface of the stainless steel. The result of an inspection should be recorded in a report. EN 1337-10 gives an example for such a report. For maintenance the bearings should be cleaned, lubricated (if necessary and possible) and coated with paint. Small defects should be repaired as far as possible.


Replacement of bearings

The replacement of bearings is a normal maintenance operation for bridges. Thus, a bridge designer has to provide measures so that a replacement can be carried out easily. The owner of a bridge has to define in the tender if the replacement of the bearings must be carried out under full traffic, restricted traffic or without traffic, depending on the importance of the bridge and the possibility of a traffic ban or a traffic diversion. In case of a replacement under traffic the jacking equipment should allow the same movements as the bearing. To allow rotations the jacks around one bearing should be connected to a single hydraulic circle. That means that the security devices must have a sufficient clearance. Translations are possible by means of additional sliding constructions.

reinforcement against splitting tension

Fig.1.11-1: Stiffened areas for hydraulic jacks To replace a bearing, the bridge has to be lifted by one or more hydraulic jacks. For hydraulic jacks, adequately stiffened areas to transmit the hydraulic jack forces to the sub- and superstructure are required. Concrete parts must be reinforced against splitting tension, steel parts need stiffeners (fig.1.11-2). Thus, the construction drawings must show in which areas or at which points hydraulic jacks can be set, what are the maximum lifting forces and up to which level the bridge may safely be lifted. This


1. Bearings

data is of particular importance if the bridge is supported in a statically indeterminate way at one abutment or pier, in which case the lifting force depends on the height of lift. High stresses can be induced in the cross girder or diaphragm by the lifting device. In such cases it may be necessary to lift the whole cross section uniformly with two or more hydraulic jacks even for exchanging only one bearing. If more than one jack is used the forces can be controlled by hydraulic connection of some or of all jacks: all connected jacks have the same pressure. Hydraulic jacks need some clearance for the installation. For lifting by a few millimetres up to two centimetres flat piston jacks can be used. The following table gives a guide for the required clearances:

Force kN
500 1000 2000 5000

Required clearance Normal hydraulic jack mm



Required clearance Flat piston jack mm 150 180

200 250


Table 1.11-1: Required clearance for hydraulic jacks There are flat jacks with a height of 80 mm and a lifting force up to 5000 kN. But their stroke is only 20 mm and there is no security device. This kind of jack should be applied for special cases only. New bridges should be constructed for normal hydraulic jacks. In all situations, during the replacement of a bearing the hydraulic jack should be secured by a mechanical device such as an adjusting nut for the piston or lining plates to avoid dropping in case of pipe rupture or rupture of the piston sealing which sometimes can occur (fig.1.11-3 and fig.1.11-2).

Fig.1.11-2: Hydraulic jack with lining plates

1.12 Codes and standards


Fig. 1.11-3: Hydraulic jack with thread and nut If the replacement of a bearing takes a long time so that displacements of moveable bearings will occur, the hydraulic jacks have to be equipped with a sliding device, normally PTFE plus a sliding plate of stainless steel. Particular care is required when replacing bearings which transmit horizontal forces: if the friction between the jack and the surface of sub- and superstructure is not sufficient it is necessary to restrain the movement of the bridge by appropriate devices. If the replacement is done under traffic, in most cases, and especially for railway bridges, these devices have to transmit all horizontal forces due to a possible loss of friction.


Codes and standards

The first attempts to standardize bearings in national codes were made decades ago. In Europe several codes and national standards are available. The best known national standards in Europe on this topic are Germany: DIN 4141 Lager im Bauwesen (structural bearings), Teil 1 bis 14. United Kingdom: BS 5400 Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges. Section 9.1 Code of Practice for design of bridge bearings Section 9.2 Specification of materials, manufacturing and installation of bridge bearings New European Standards about bearings are the following EN 1337 "Structural bearings" with the parts EN 1337-1 General design rules EN 1337-2 Sliding elements EN 1337-3 Elastomeric bearings EN 1337-4 Roller bearings


1. Bearings

EN 1337-5 EN 1337-6 EN 1337-7 EN 1337-8 EN 1337-9 EN 1337-10 EN 1337-11

Pot bearings Rocker bearings Spherical and cylindrical PTFE bearings Guided bearings and Restrained bearings Protection Inspection and maintenance Transport, storage and installation

A recommendable American Standards about bearings is the following: AASHO-LRFD: American Association of State Highway Officials (1994).

1.13 References
Books and special chapters about bearings for bridges: Eggert H., J. Grote, W. Kauschke: Lager im Bauwesen. Verlag von Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Mnchen, Dsseldorf 1974. Lee D.J.: Bridge Bearings and Expansion Joints. Second edition by E & FN Spon, London, Glasgow, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras 1994. Eggert H., W. Kauschke: Lager im Bauwesen. 2. Auflage, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin 1995. Rahlwes K., R. Maurer: Lagerung und Lager von Bauwerken in: Beton-Kalender 1995, Teil 2, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin.

Papers: [1] Albrecht, R.: Zur Anwendung und Berechnung von Gummilagern. Der Deutsche Baumeister 1969, Heft 4, Seite 326, und Heft 6, Seite 563. [2] Andr, Beyer, Wintergerst: Versuche und Erfahrungen mit neuen Kipp- und Gleitlagern. Der Bauingenieur 5 (1962). [3] Andr, W. und Leonhardt, F: Neue Entwicklungen fr Lager von Bauwerken, Gummi- und Gummitopflager. Die Bautechnik 39 (1969), Heft 2, Seite 37 bis 50. [4] Bayer, K.: Auflager und Fahrbahnbergnge fr Hoch- und Brckenbauten aus Kunststoff. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure VDI im Bildungswerk BV 1956 (Vortragsverffentlichung). [5] Beyer, E. und Wintergerst, L.: Neue Brckenlager, neue Pfeilerform. Der Bauingenieur 35 (1960), Heft 6, Seite 227 bis 230. [6] Eggert, H.: Brckenlager. Die Bautechnik 50 (1973), S. 143/144. [7] Bub, H.: Das neue Institut fr Bautechnik. Strasse und Autobahn, Band 20 (1969), Seite 189. [8] Burkhardt, E.: Gepanzerte Betonwlzgelenke, Pendel- und Rollenlager. Die Bautechnik 17 (1939), Seite 230. [9] Cardillo, R. und Kruse, D.: Paper (61/WA-335) ASME (1961). [10] Cichocki, F: Bremsableitung bei Brcken. Der Bauingenieur 36 (1961), Seite 304 bis 305.

1.13 References


[11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]

[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]

[28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33]

Clark, E. und Moutrop, K.: Load Deformation Characteristics of Elastomer Bridge Bearing Pads. University of Rhode Island, May 1962. Desmonsablon, Philippe: Le calcul des piles deformables avec appuis en caoutchouc. Annales des Ponts et Chausses, Paris 4/1960. Eggert, H.: Bauwerksicherheit bei Verwendung von Rollen- und Gleitlagern. Strasse Brcke Tunnel 1971, Heft 3, Seite 71. Eggert, H.: Die baurechtliche Situation bei Lagern fr Brcken und Hochbauten. Der Stahlbau 39 (1970), Heft 6, Seite 189. Einsfeld, U.: Erluterungen zu den Richtlinien von unbewehrten Elastomerlagern. Mitteilungen Institut fr Bautechnik 6/1972. Franz: Gummilager fr Brcken. VDI-Zeitschrift, Bd. 101/1959, Nr. 12, Seite 471 bis 478. Gent, A.: Rubber Bearings for Bridges. Rubber Journal and International Plastics 1959. Grote, J.: Neoprenelager - einige grundstzliche Erwgungen. Kunststoffe im Bau 7/1968. Grote, J.: Unbewehrte Elastomerlager. Der Bauingenieur 44 (1969), Seite 121. Grote, J.: Vermeidung von Rissen und Dehnungsschaden durch gummielastische Lagerungen. Kunststoffe im Bau 11/1968. Hakenjos, V.: Untersuchungen ber die Rollreibung bei Stahl im elastisch-plastischen Zustand. Technisch-wissenschaftliche Berichte der Staatlichen Materialprufungsanstalt an der Technischen Hochschule Stuttgart 1967, Heft 67/05. Heesen: Gepanzerte Betonwlzgelenke, Pendel- und Rollenlager. Die Bautechnik, Jahrgang 25 (1948), Seite 261. Htten, P.: Beitrag zur Berechnung der Lagerverschiebungen gekrmmter, durchlaufender Spannbeton-Balkenbrcken. Dissertation TH Aachen 1970. Jrn, R.: Gummi im Bauwesen. Elastische Lagerung einer Pumpenstation. Der Bauingenieur 36 (1961), Heft 4, Seite 137/138. Keen: Creep of Neoprene in Shear Under Static Conditions, Ten Years, Transactions of the ASME, Juli 1953. Leonhardt und Andr: Sttzungsprobleme der Hochstrassenbrcken. Betonund Stahlbetonbau 55 (1960), Heft 6. Leonhardt, F. und Reimann, H.: Betongelenke, Versuchsbericht, Vorschlge zur Bemessung und konstruktiven Ausbildung. DAfStb, Heft 175. Berlin: Verlag Ernst & Sohn 1966, und Leonhardt, F. und Reimann, H.: Betongelenke. Der Bauingenieur 41 (1966), Seite 49. Leonhardt, F. und Wintergerst, L.: ber die Brauchbarkeit von Bleigelenken. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 1961, Heft 5, Seite 123 bis 131. Maguire, C. und Assoc: Elastomeric Bridge Bearings Pads 1959. Massonnet: Zuschrift zu B. Topaloff, Gummilager fr Brcken. Der Bauingenieur 39 (1964), Seite 428. Mnnig, E. und Netzel, D.: Zur Bemessung von Betongelenken. Der Bauingenieur 44 (1969), Seite 433 bis 439. Morton, M.: Rubber Technology. Reinhold Publishing Co. 1959. Mullins, L.: Softening of Rubber by Deformation. Rubber Chemistry and Technology (Feb. 1969).

44 [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49]

1. Bearings


[51] [52]

[53] [54] [54] [55]

Nordlin, E., Stoker, S. and Trinble, R.: Laboratory and Field Performance of Elastomeric Bridge Bearing Pads, Highway Research Board (1968). Pare u. Keiner: Elastomeric Bridge Bearings. Highway Research Board Bull 242, 1960. Payne u. Scott: Engineering Design with Rubber Rejcha, C: Design of Elastomer Bearings. Journal of Prestressed Concrete Institute Oct. 1964, Vol. 9, Nr. 5. Resinger, F.: Lngszwngungen - eine Ursache von Brckenlagerschden. Der Bauingenieur 46 (1971), Seite 334. Rieckmann, H.-P: Einfluss der Lagerkonstruktion auf die Knicklnge von Pfeilern. Strasse Brcke Tunnel 1970, Seite 36 bis 42 und Seite 270 bis 272. Sasse, H.-R. und Schorn, H.: Bewehrte Elastomerlager - Stand der Entwicklung. Plastik-Konstruktion 1971, Heft 5, Seite 209 bis 227. Schnhofer: Neugestaltungen auf dem Gebiet des Auflagerbaues und auf verwandten Gebieten. Werner-Verlag, Dsseldorf 1952. Sedyter: ber die Wirkungsweise von Bleigelenken. Beton und Eisen 1926, Seite 29. Shen, M. K.: ber die Lsung des Balkens mit unverschieblichen Auflagern. Der Bauingenieur 39 (1964), Seite 100. Suess, K. und Grote, J.: Einige Versuche an Neoprenelagern. Der Bauingenieur 38 (1963), Heft 4, Seite 152 bis 157. Thielker, E.: Elastomeric Bearing Pads and Their Application in Structures, Paper 207 of Leap Conference (1964). Thul, H.: Briickenlager. Der Stahlbau 38 (1969), Seite 353. Topaloff, B.: Gummilager fr Brcken - Berechnung und Anwendung. Der Bauingenieur 39 (1964), Seite 50 bis 64. Topaloff, B.: Gummilager fr Brcken. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 54 (1959), Heft 9. Uetz, H. und Breckel, H.: Reibungs- und Verschleissversuche mit Teflon. Sonderheft der Staatl. Materialprfungsanstalt an der TH Stuttgart, 7.12.1964, Seite 67/76. Uetz, H. und Hakenjos, V.: Reibungsuntersuchungen mit Polytetrafluorthylen bei hin- und hergehender Bewegung. Die Bautechnik 44 (1967), Heft 5, Seite 159 bis 166. Uetz, H. und Hakenjos, V.: Gleitreibungs- und Gleitverschleissversuche an Kunststoffen. Kunststoffe, 59. Jahrgang 1969, Heft 3, Seite 161 bis 168. Weiprecht, M.: Auflagerung von Brcken. Eisners Taschenbuch fr den Bautechnischen Eisenbahndienst, 1967, Seite 231 bis 277, Abschnitt E Brckenund Ingenieurhochbau. Zies, K.-W.: Stabilitt von Sttzen mit Rollenlagern. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 65 (1970), Seite 297. AASHO-LRFD: American Association of State Highway Officials (1994). Dupont de Nemours Co.: Design of Neoprene Bridge Bearing Pads, Wilmington (1959). CNR-UNI 10018-68 (Italian Standards for rubber bearings).

1.13 References [56] [57] [58]


[59] [60] [61] [62] [63]

[64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71]



[74] [75]

Ministry of Transport: Provisional Rules for the Use of Rubber Bearings in Highway Bridges, Memo. 802, London (1962). Mitteilungen, Institut fr Bautechnik, 1970, Heft 2 und 4, und 1971, Heft 4 und 6. Ohne Verfasser. Auflager aus Teflon. Auszge aus dem Journal of Teflon 1964, 1965 und 1966, Druckschrift der Du Pont de Nemours International S.A. Geneva, Switzerland. Ohne Verfasser. Brckenlager. Beratungsstelle fr Stahlverwendung, Dsseldorf, Merkblatt 339, 2. Auflage 1968. ORE Office de Recherches et d'Essais: Verwendung von Gummi fr Brckenlager, Frage D 60, Utrecht (1962, 1964, 1965). Wiedemann, L.: Zustzliche Richtlinien fr Lager im Brcken- und Hochbau. Mitteilungen Institut fr Bautechnik 3/1973, S. 73. Verlag Ernst & Sohn. Eggert: Vorlesungen ber Lager im Bauwesen. Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn 1980/1981. Kauschke, W.: Entwicklungsstand der Gleitlagertechnik fr Brckenbauwerke in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bauingenieur 64 (1989), Seite 109 bis 120. Battermann/Khler: Elastomere Federung, Elastische Lagerungen. W. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Mnchen 1982. Gerb: Schwingungsisolierungen. Berlin, 9. Auflage 1992, Eigenverlag (gegen Schutzgebhr erhltlich). Grote, J. und Kreuzinger, H.: Pendelsttzen mit Elastomerlagern. Der Bauingenieur 53 (1978), Seite 63/64. Kanning, W.: Elastomer-Lager fr Pendelsttzen - Einfluss der Lager auf die Beanspruchung der Sttzen. Der Bauingenieur 55 (1980), Seite 455. Maurer/Rahlwes: Lagerung und Lager von Bauwerken. Betonkalender 1995, Ernst & Sohn, Teil II. Weihermller, H. und Knppler, K.: Lagerreibung beim Stabilittsnachweis von Brckenpfeilern. Bauingenieur 55 (1980), Seite 285 bis 288. Andr, W.: Der heutige Entwicklungsstand des Topflagers und seine Weiterentwicklung zum Hublager. Bautechnik (1984), Seite 222 bis 230. Eggert, H.: 7 Grundstze bei der Lagerung von Brcken. 9. IVBH-Kongress Amsterdam 1972, Schlussbericht. Internationale Vereinigung fr Brckenbau und Hochbau, Zrich, Schweiz. Deinhard, J.M., Kordina, K., Mozahn, R., Storkebaum, K.-H.: Der Schadensfall an der Mainbrcke bei Hochheim. Beton - Stahlbetonbau, 72 (1977), Seite 1 bis 7. Eggert, H. und Wiedemann, L.: Nutzungsgerechte Lagerung von Stahl- und Verbundbrcken und unterhaltungsgerechte Konstruktion von Brckenlagern. IVBH Symposium Dresden 1975. Vorbericht. Eggert, H.: Lager fr Brcken und Hochbauten. Bauingenieur 53 (1978), Seite 161 bis 168, und Zuschrift 54 (1979), Seite 200. Knig, G. et. al.: Spannbeton: Bewhrung im Brckenbau. Analyse von Bauwerksdaten, Schden und Erhaltungskosten. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokio 1986.


1. Bearings

[76] [77] [78]

[79] [80]


[82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90]


[92] [93] [94]


Pfohl, H.: Reaktionskraft am Festpunkt von Brcken aus Bremslast und Bewegungswiderstnden der Lager. Bauingenieur 58 (1983), Seite 453 bis 457. Eggert, H. und Hakenjos, V.: Die Wirkungsweise von Kalottenlagern. Der Bauingenieur 49 (1974), Heft 3, Seite 93/94. Lehmann, Dieter: Beitrge zur Berechnung der Elastomerlager. Die Bautechnik I (1978), Seite 19 bis 22, II (1978), Seite 99 bis 102, III (1978), Seite 190 bis 198, IV (1979), Seite 163 bis 169. Kordina, K. und Nlting, D.: Zur Auflagerung von Stahlbetonteilen mittels unbewehrter Elastomerlager. Der Bauingenieur 56 (1981), Seite 41 bis 44. Kordina, K. und Osterath, H.-H.: Zur Auflagerung von Stahlbetonteilen mittels unbewehrter und bewehrter Elastomerlager. Der Bauingenieur 59 (1984), Seite 461 bis 466. Kessler, E. und Schwerm, D.: Unebenheiten und Schiefwinkligkeiten der Auflagerflachen fur Elastomerlager bei Stahlbetonfertigteilen. Fertigteilbauforum 13/83, Seite 1 bis 5 (Betonwerk + Fertigteil-Technik). Kessler, E.: Die Anwendung unbewehrter Elastomerlager. Betonwerk + Fertigteil-Technik, Heft 6 (1987), Seite 419 bis 429. Bundesminister fr Verkehr: Schden an Brcken und anderen Ingenieurbauwerken. Dokumentation 1982. Verkehrsblatt-Verlag, Dortmund. Bundesminister fr Verkehr: Bericht ber Schden an Bauwerken der Bundesverkehrswege. Januar 1984. Eigenverlag BMV. Beyer, E. und Eisermann, G.: Nachstellbare Brckenlager. Erfahrungen beim Bauvorhaben Dsseldorf-Hauptbahnhof. Beton 5/1983. Dickerhoff, K.J.: Bemessung von Brckenlagern unter Gebrauchslast. Dissertation Universitt Karlsruhe 1985. Petersen, Chr.: Zur Beanspruchung moderner Brckenlager. Festschrift J. Scheer, Mrz 1987. Hehn, K.-H.: Prfeinrichtung zur Untersuchung von Lagern. VDI-Z 118 (1976), Seite 114 bis 118. N.N., Sanierung der Klnbreinsperre, Projektierung und Ausfhrung. 1. Auflage Mai 1991. Herausgeber: sterreichische Donaukraftwerke AG. Hakenjos, V. und Richter, K.: Dauergleitreibungsverhalten der Gleitpaarung PTFE weiss/Austenitischer Stahl fr Lager im Brckenbau. Strasse, Briicke, Tunnel 11 (1975), Seite 294 bis 297. Imbimbo M. und Kelly J.M.: Influence of Material Stiffening on Stability of Elastomeric Bearings at Large Displacements. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. Sept. 1998. Zederbaum, J. (1966): The frame action of a bridge deck supported on elastic bearings. Civil Engineering and Public Works Review 61(714), 67-72. Leonhardt, F. und Andr, W. (1960): Stiitzprobleme der Hochstrassenbrcken. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, 55(6), 121-32. Tanaka, R., Natsukawa, K. and Ohira, T. (1984): Thermal behaviour of multispan viaduct in frame. In International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering, 12th Congress, Vancouver, Canada, 3-7 September. Building Research Establishment (1979) Estimation of thermal and moisture movements and stresses; Part 2, Digest 228, Watford.

1.13 References



Emerson M. (1977): Temperature differences in bridges: basis of design requirements. TRRL Laboratory Report 765. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [97] Emerson M. (1968): Bridge temperatures and movements in the British Isles. RRL Report LR 228, pp.38. Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [98] Emerson M. (1973): The calculation of the distribution of temperature in bridges. TRRL Report LR 561. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [99] Emerson M. (1976): Bridge temperatures estimated from the shade temperature. TRRL Report LR 696. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [100] Stephenson, D. A. (1961): Effects of differential temperature on tall slender columns. Concrete and Constructional Engineering, 56(5), 175-8: 56(11), 401-3. [101] Garrett, R.J. (1985): The distribution of temperature in bridges. The Journal of the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, May, 35-8. [102] Comit Euro-International du Bton (1984). Design manual on structural effects of time-dependent behaviour of concrete (Bulletin No. 142). George Publishing Company. [103] Comit Euro-International du Bton (1985). Manual of Cracking and Deformations. Bulletin 158E, Lausanne. [104] Neville, A.M., Dilger, W.H. and Brooks, J.J. (1983): Creep of Plain and Structural Concrete. Construction Press, London and New York. [105] Mattock A.H. (1961): Precast-prestressed concrete bridge 5.Creep and shrinkage studies. Journal of the Portland Cement Association Research and Development Laboratories, May. [106] Institution of Geological Sciences: National Environmental Research Council (1976), Atlas of Seismic Activity 1909-1968. Seismological Bulletin No.5. [107] Dollar, A.T.J., Abedi, S.M.H., Lilwall, R.C. und Willmore, R.L. (1975): Earthquake risk in the UK. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 58, 123-4. [108] ICE and SECED (1985): Earthquake engineering in Britain. Proceedings of Conference of the Institution of Civil Engineers and the Society of Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics, University of East Anglia, April. [109] Lee, D.J. (1971): The Theory and Practice of Bearings and Expanison Joints for Bridges, Cement and Concrete Association. [110] Buchler, W. (1987): Design of Pot Bearings, American Concrete Institute Publication, SP-94, Vol.2, pp. 882-915. [1ll] Black, W. (1971): Notes on bridge bearings, RRL Report LR 382, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [112] Kauschke, W. and Baignet, M. (1987) Improvements in the Long Term Durability of Bearings in Bridges, American Concrete Institute Publication SP-94, Vol.2, 577-612. [113] Taylor, M.E. (1970): PTFE in highway bridges. TRRL Report LR 491, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [114] Eggert, H., Kauschke, W.: Lager im Bauwesen, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin 1996.


1. Bearings

[115] Hakenjos, V.: Lager im Bauwesen mit Komponenten aus Kunststoff verdrngen hochbeanspruchbare sthlerne Rollenlager. 13th H.F. Mark-Symposium on 19-10-94 in Vienna. [116] Marioni, A.: Apparecchi di appoggio per ponti e strutture. ITEC, Milano 1983 [117] Campbell, T. I. and Kong, W. L.: TFE Sliding Surfaces In Bridge Bearings. Report ME-87-06, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsview, Ontario, 1987. [118] Crozier, W. F, Stoker, J. R., Martin, V. C. and Nordlin, E. F: A Laboratory Evaluation of Full-Size Elastomeric Bridge Bearing Pads. Research Report CA DOT, TL-6574-1-74-26, Highway Research Report, June 1979. [119] Gent, A. N.: Elastic Stability of Rubber Compression Springs. ASME, Journal of Mech. Engr. Science, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1964. [120] Jacobsen, F. K. and Taylor R. K.: TFE Expansion Bearings for Highway Bridges. Report No. RDR-31, Illinois DOT, June 1971. [121] McEwen, E. E. and Spencer, G. D.: Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Results Concerning Distribution of Stress Under Pot Bearings. Proceedings of 1 st World Congress on Bearings and Sealants, ACI Publication SP-70, Niagara Falls, 1981. [122] Nordlin, E. F, Boss, J. F. and Trimble, R. R.: Tetrafluorethylene (TFE) as a Bridge Bearing Material. Research Report, M & R 64642-2, California DOT, Sacramento, CA, June 1970. [123] Roark. R. J. and Young, W. C: Formulas for Stress and Strain. 5th Ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1976. [124] Roeder, C. W., Stanton, J. F. and Taylor, A. W.: Performance of Elastomeric Bearings. NCHRP Report 298, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C, October 1987. [125] Roeder, C. W. and Stanton, J. F: State of the Art Elastomeric Bridge Bearing Design. ACI Journal, 1991. [126] Roeder, C. W., Stanton, J. F and Feller, T.: Low Temperature Performance of Elastomers. ASCE, Journal of Cold Regions, Vol. 4, No. 3, September 1990, pp 113-132. [127] Roeder, C. W. and Stanton, J. F: Failure Modes of Elastomeric Bearings and Influence of Manufacturing Methods. Proceedings of 2nd World Congress on Bearings and Sealants, ACI Publication SP-94, Vol. 1, San Antonio, Texas, 1986. [128] Roeder, C. W., Stanton, J. F and Taylor, A. W.: Fatigue of Steel-Reinforced Elastomeric Bearings. ASCE, Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 116, No. 2, February 1990. [129] Roeder, C. W., and Stanton, J. F: Elastomeric Bearings: A State of the Art. ASCE, Journal of the Structural Division, No. 12, Vol. 109, December 1983. [130] Saxena, A. and McEwen, E. E.: Behaviour of Masonry Bearing Plates in Highway Bridges. Proceedings of 2nd World Congress on Bearings and Sealants, ACI Publication SP-94, San Antonio, 1986. [131] Stanton, J. F and Roeder, C. W.: Elastomeric Bearings Design, Construction, and Materials. NCHRP Report 248, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C, August 1982.

1.13 References


[132] Stanton, J. F Scroggins, G., Taylor, A. W. and Roeder, C. W.: Stability of Laminated Elastomeric Bearings. ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 116, No. 6, June 1990, pp 1351-1371. [133] Structural Bearing Specification. FHWA Region 3 Structural Committee for Economical Fabrication, Subcommittee for High Load Multi-Rotational Bearings (HLMRB), October 1991.

Page Blank In Original




Expansion Joints

As mentioned in chapter 1.1, movements in old stone and timber bridges were small and no additional devices were necessary to close the gaps between bridges and abutments due to bridge movements. The first expansion joints were built for steel railway bridges because their movements were not negligible. With the increase of road traffic and of its speed, closing the gaps became necessary for safety reasons, especially at the moveable bearings. Initially, cover plates were used for expansion joints. For longer bridges these cover plates were not sufficient, so that finger joints and sliding plate joints were used. All these types of expansion joints were not watertight and so the water ran down to the bearings and to the abutments. The first watertight expansion joints were built using steel rails between rubber tubes to absorb the movements. This principle led to a lot of different multisealed expansion joints which differed in the means of supporting the steel rails, in the rubber profiles and in controlling the gap widths. Another type of watertight expansion joint is the cushion joint, consisting of a rubber cushion with vulcanised steel plates which transfer the traffic loads. In spite of continuous amendments of all constructions for expansion joints, these still remain wearing parts, especially in bridges with high traffic density and high traffic loads. The following chapters give a short survey of expansion joints for different movements used in the construction of bridges.


The role of expansion joints

The role of expansion joints is to carry loads and to provide safety to the traffic over the gap between bridge and abutment or between two bridges in a way that all bridge displacements can take place with very low resistance or with no resistance at all. A further requirement is a low noise level especially in an urban environment. The expansion joints should provide a smooth transition from the bridge to the adjacent areas. The replacement of an expansion joint is always combined with a traffic interruption - at least of the affected lane. Therefore expansion joints should be robust and suitable for all loads and local actions under all weather conditions, moisture and deicing agents. The replacement of all wearing parts should be possible in a simple way.


Calculation of movements of expansion joints

Movements of expansion joints depend on the size of the bridge and the arrangement of the bearings. Normally the form of construction depends on the horizontal translation orthogonal to the joint. But it is necessary to consider all translations and rotations to ensure that the displacements will not reach the limits of the joint construction. To describe the movements of an expansion joint in detail we have to consider three translations and three rotations (fig.2.3-1).


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.3-1: Possible movements These movements result from temperature, displacements due to external loads, and creep and shrinkage in concrete and composite bridges. We may obtain the move ments (displacements and rotations) from the structural analysis of the system. Move ments due to loads depend on the location of the loads. The controlling deformations can be determined with influence lines (fig.2.3-2 and fig.2.3-3). The influence line of a deflection is the bending line due to a unit load acting in the direction of the con sidered movement.

Fig.2.3-2: Influence line for a translation

Fig.2.3-3: Influence line for a rotation To obtain the displacement caused by a rotation it is also possible to calculate the rotations; the displacements can be determined from the known rotations. 2.3.1 Horizontal translation in the direction of the bridge axis ux A change of the environment temperature, creep under normal force and shrinkage lead to a uniform extension or shortening of the bridge (fig.2.3.1-1). The thermal expansion coefficients of steel and concrete have approximately the same value (T = 1.0...1,2 10-5 /K ). A uniform change of temperature about the cross section causes only a horizontal translation of the joint. This applies to composite bridges, too.

2.3 Calculation of movements of expansion joints

Fig.2.3.1-1: Uniformly extension or shortening

Temperature: Creep and shrinkage of concrete bridges


Coefficient of creep Permanent normal force (compression > 0)


Shrinkage coefficient

A possible problem is the change of the location of the fixing point or the unknown location of the fixing point. On arch bridges the superstructure is usually fixed at the crown of the arch. The fixing point is moved by the deformation of the arch due to the asymmetrical load. Buried expansion joints are often used for short bridges (Chapter 2.4). If the fixing point is situated on longer piers, it acts as a horizontal spring bearing. Due to a movement in the joint a plastic deformation of the asphalt layer occurs and the construction has a certain rigidity. A different rigidity of the expansion joints on the right and left abutment and a possible longitudinal deformation can lead to the cracking of the asphalt layer at one abutment. As the rigidity of this joint is higher than the rigidity of the piers the new fixing point is situated near the undamaged expansion joint (fig. 2.3.1-2).

Fig.2.3.1-2: Change of the fixing point


2. Expansion Joints

In the case of an elastic fixing point there are additional movements at expansion joints due to acceleration and braking forces. The actual rigidity of piers can differ from the planned rigidity. Moreover, if the bridge is fixed on more than one pier, the position of the fixing point can differ from the planned position. Creep and shrinkage in composite bridges (acting in the concrete parts of crosssection only) mainly lead to deflections which result in rotations above the y-axis (fig. 2.3.1-4). Creep can be considered using a reduced section area and a reduced moment of inertia, shrinkage by a substitute tensile force N s h acting on the free shrinking con crete. N s h is a compression force acting on the composite cross-section. N s h = cs Ac E c sc Shrinkage coefficient

Ac Area of concrete Ec Reduced modulus of elasticity of concrete to consider creep Fig.2.3.1-3: Equivalent shrinking force

Fig.2.3.1-4: Deflection underload

Horizontal movements of expansion joints can also be caused by vertical movements of the abutments. They are caused by foundation settlements or by replacement of bearings (fig. 2.3.1-5). Statically indeterminate steel and composite bridges can be prestressed by intentional lifting and/or lowering at the bearings.

positive definition:

2.3 Calculation of movements of expansion joints


Fig.2.3.1-5: Displacement of bearings

If a fixing point is located on a high pier the additional movements due to pier deformation must be considered in the structural analysis. The movements can result from acceleration, braking forces, uniform and non-uniform temperature actions. 2.3.2 Horizontal translation in direction of the cross-section uy A horizontal translation in the crosswise direction results if the angle between the joint and the moving direction of the bearing is not 90 (e.g. in skew bridges). The magnitude of the movement depends on the magnitude of the movement in the direction of the bridge axis and on this angle (fig.2.3.2-1 and fig.2.3.2-2).

Fig.2.3.2-1: Skewed bridge


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.3.2-2: Skewed bearing conditions 2.3.3 Vertical translation uz Vertical translations uz can be caused by the replacement of bearings (fig.2.3.3-3) and the geometrical conditions on the abutment (fig.2.3.3-1 and fig.2.3.3-2).

Fig.2.3.3-1: Sloping bridge with horizontal bearings

Fig.2.3.3-2: Bridge with short cantilever on the abutment

2.3 Calculation of movements of expansion joints


Hydraulic jack

Fig.2.3.3-3: Vertical displacement of bearings (due to bearing replacement) 2.3.4 Rotation around the bridge axis x In the case of a replacement of one single bearing at one side a rotation (x occurs (fig. 2.3.4-1). However, it is possible to avoid this movement by uniform lifting over the cross-section.

Hydraulic jack Fig.2.3.4-1: Lifting on one side 2.3.5 Rotation around the y-axis y This deformation is caused by vertical loading and non-uniform temperature. The controlling load positions of the traffic loads can be determined with influence lines.

Fig.2.3.5-1: Rotation due to deflections 2.3.6 Rotation around the z-axis z The deformation z is caused by non-uniform temperature action in the horizontal direction, and by wind loads (fig.2.3.6-1).


2. Expansion Joints

Fixed bearing

Fig.2.3.6-1: Non-uniform temperature action


Construction of expansion joints

2.4.1 General The construction of expansion joints has to fulfil the following requirements: - movement capacity - bearing capacity for static and dynamic loading, - watertightness to save bearings, substructure and possible linkage of expansion joints from deterioration, - low noise emission, - traffic safety. To fulfil the last two requirements a limitation of gap widths is essential. Additionally, it is recommended to avoid slopes exceeding about 3 % and vertical steps between joined surfaces exceeding 8 mm (fig.2.4.1-1).

Fig.2.4.1-1: Recommended safety requirements Expansion joints are exposed to pollution. The sealing should not be damaged by inclusions of bigger external bodies. If the gap width is reduced due to a movement of the superstructure the joint must be able to expel grit and silt to the carriageway surface.

2.4 Construction of expansion joints


In particular, all elastomeric components must be readily accessible and easily replaceable. 2.4.2 Small movements (up to 25 mm) For movements up to 15 mm it is possible to construct a continuous asphaltic carriageway pavement with a supporting element covering the gap of the superstructure. This kind of joint is also called a buried expansion joint (fig.2.4.2-1). Up to 10 mm a flat metal plate is sufficient; for movements above 10 mm an elastomeric pad is necessary to avoid pavement cracks at the edges of the supporting plate. An additional reinforcement of the pavement is advisable to provide a uniform strain distribution. The thickness of the pavement should be at least 80 mm and should be equal to the thickness of the corresponding parts of the superstructure and the abutment. To fulfil this requirement the cover of the gap is usually extended into a niche. The asphaltic pavement does not provide sufficient watertightness. An additional sealing is recommended to protect bearings and substructure from deterioration.

Fig. 2.4.2-1: Buried expansion joint There are covering elements fulfilling the requirements of support, strain distribution and watertightness without additional sealing, e.g. the following kind of joint construction (fig.2.4.2-2 and fig.2.4.2-3).

Fig.2.4.2-2: Buried expansion joint sealed by a rubber profile


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.4.2-3: Buried expansion joint with continuous sealing and additional rubber profile For movements between 15 and 25 mm the asphaltic material above the joint can be replaced by a specially modified asphaltic material. Constructions of this kind are called asphaltic plug joints (fig.2.4.2-4 and fig.2.4.2-5). The thickness should be at least 80 mm, while the length should not exceed 700 mm. Though movements exceeding 25 mm could be managed in laboratory tests the influence of temperature and of deformation velocity is not known adequately. Incorrect placement of material results in tearing of the adjacent carriageway pavement. Further problems are yielding of asphaltic material under the wheels of standing vehicles, brake and acceleration forces combined with high environment temperatures, and the development of rutting. Because of their low lifetime (though combined with low relative costs) asphaltic plug joints are recommended for temporary purposes.

Fig.2.4.2-4: Asphaltic plug joint

2.4 Construction of expansion joints


Fig.2.4.2-5: Asphaltic plug joint additional sealed by a rubber profile 2.4.3 Medium movements (over 25 mm, up to 80 mm) The absorption of medium movements requires an elastic expansion element or an expansion gap across the carriageway surface. For traffic safety, gaps below 5 mm or over 65 mm are not recommended. Thus, the expansion movement of a simple gap construction is limited to 60 mm. Expansion joints for medium movements consist of a sealing element, edge elements, and fixing elements. The sealing element can be replaced by a cushion element that absorbs movements caused by shear deformation (fig.2.4.3-1).


Construction methods of expansion joints for medium movements

Seals of expansion gaps can be constructed as V-shaped sealing strips (fig.2.4.3-2) or hollow sections (fig.2.4.3-4). Movements are absorbed by the folding of these elements. There are special seals for pavements and cyclist areas to decrease the width of the gap to avoid accidents (fig.2.4.3-3). Traditional cover-plates are prone to rattling and corrosion and hinder the accessibility of possible seals, but they provide the best comfort for pedestrians with high heel shoes (fig.2.4.3-6).


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.4.3-2: V-shaped sealing

Fig.2.4.3-3: Special sealing for sidewalks

Fig.2.4.3-4: Hollow section

Fig.2.4.3-5: Expansion joint with V-shaped sealing

Fig.2.4.3-6: Expansion joint with cover plate

Fig.2.4.3-7: Expansion joint for sidewalks

2.4 Construction of expansion joints


The use of seals made from cellular neoprene extrusion has the advantage of a closed carriageway surface. In addition to the function as sealing, they are able to transfer traffic loads. Movements up to 80 mm can be accommodated (fig.2.4.3-8).

Fig. 2.4.3-8: Seals made from cellular neoprene extrusion Elastomeric cushion joints (fig.2.4.3-9) are made from neoprene reinforced with steel plates. Thus, traffic loads can be transferred without significant deflections. The movements are absorbed by increasing and decreasing of the widths of the two gaps on the upper side. The maximum movement is limited by the gap width. The rubber cover of the bearing plate can wear away under traffic or can be damaged (e.g. by snow ploughs) which lowers the skid resistance.

Fig. 2.4.3-9: Elastomeric cushion joint Especially when using elastomeric cushions and neoprene extrusion seals, the restraining actions can exceed 20 kN/m which in some cases is not negligible. 2.4.4 Large movements (over 80 mm) For large movements, sealing elements and rail elements are coupled. Additionally to the components of a single gap construction, intermediate elements (also called rails), supporting elements and linkage elements are needed (fig.2.4.4-1). Linkage elements cause equal gap widths saving the seals from overextending. They must be able to sustain acceleration and braking forces.


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.4.4-1: Construction method of expansion joints for large movements The following figure shows the coupling of cushion elements. In this case a special linkage mechanism is not necessary due to the high deformation resistance of the single elements which actually act as a spring linkage.

Fig.2.4.4-2: Coupled elastomeric cushion joint A typical construction is the coupling of V-shaped and hollow section sealing elements. It is called multiple seal expansion joint. These expansion joints can be classified by the kind of supporting and linkage. The folding trellis linkages (fig.2.4.4-3) satisfy all supporting and linkage purposes.

2.4 Construction of expansion joints


Fig.2.4.4-3: Rails supported by folding trellis linkage An additional linkage is needed if the rails are supported by parallel beams. One possibility is the spring linkage (fig.2.4.4-4). Springs are made of an elastic material. The portion of the resisting force resulting from friction depends on the number of rails and supporting beams whereas the portion of spring force is independent at the number of springs because of the series connection. A disadvantage of this kind of linkage is that acceleration and braking forces cause non-uniform spring deformations. If the gaps are opened near to the maximum value the seals can be overextended. Another possibility of linkage of parallel supporting beams is the use of horizontal parallel linkages (fig.2.4.4-5).


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.4.4-4: Rails supported by beams, spacing controlled by springs

Fig.2.4.4-5: Rails supported by beams. Spacing controlled by horizontal parallel linkages

Fig.2.4.4-6: Rails supported by hinged arranged beams (Swivel System)

Fig.2.4.4-7: Linkage

2.4 Construction of expansion joints


If the supporting beams are skew (Swivel System, fig.2.4.4-6) they control the gap width by means of the kinematic characteristic of the mechanism (fig.2.4.4-7). The number of supporting beams does not depend on the number of rails. The higher the number of rails the more economical becomes the application of hinged supporting beams. As an alternative to the application of multiple seal expansion joints, special nonwatertight constructions like cantilever-toothed joints or rolling leaf joints (also called roller shutter plate expansion joint) are used. Both the cantilever-toothed joint and the rolling leaf joint are as a rule not watertight, so that an additional drainage system is necessary. The cantilever-toothed joint (fig.2.4.4-8), also called finger joint, is a very robust construction but with several disadvantages. The deformation capacity in the crosswise direction is severely limited and vertical deformations of the joint can prejudice traffic safety. To accommodate small vertical deformations without hazard the free finger ends should be rounded. Finger joints with supported fingers (fig.2.4.4-9) have proved to be not as good as with cantilever fingers. The rolling leaf joint (fig.2.4.4-10) consists of a tongue plate, a rocker plate, and sliding plates. The acceptable movement depends on the size and number of sliding plates. Rolling leaf joints can exhibit the following disadvantages: - broken hinges (falling shutter plates cause gaps in the motorway), - wear of the bearing surface, - breaking of the restraining spring elements. Some manufactures have carried out important improvements by: - stronger hinges, - use of specially designed bearings for the shutter plates, - stronger restraining elements with elastomeric springs, - rubber seals between the plates (it makes the joint watertight to a great extent).

Fig.2.4.4-8: Cantilever-toothed joint or finger joint


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.4.4-9: Finger joint with supported fingers

Fig.2.4.4-10: Rolling leaf joint 2.4.5 Expansion joints for railway bridges For the expansion joints for railway bridges it is necessary to consider two elements: - the rails themselves, - the bridge. Nowadays, a continuous track without expansion joints is preferred, due to the comfort of the passengers. Therefore, many modern railway bridges have no expansion devices for the track. Eurocode 1, part 3 (ENV 1991-3), gives rules for the maximum expansion lengths for continuous tracks. The expansion length (i.e. the distance between the "thermal centre" and the opposite end of the deck) should not exceed 60 m for steel structures with a ballast bed and 90 m for concrete and composite structures, again with a ballast bed. If the expansion length exceeds these values expansion devices should be used.

2.4 Construction of expansion joints


Two different types of railway expansion joints are in use by the railway authorities. The first type consists of a parallel joint in the rail and works according to fig.2.4.5-1.

Fig. 2.4.5-1: Parallel joint in the rail The second type is normally used for high speed railways (fig.2.4.5-2). It consists of an ending rail with a slope of 1 : r, with r = 70 to 100, and a tapered rail which is ma chined in the same slope. This expansion joint has the advantage that there is no gap between the rails and that the wheel load is carried by a full profile section, but the disadvantage that the rail gauge will be widened by the expansion, according to the slope:

E.g., for an expansion of l = 200 mm and with r = 70 m the gauge is widened by s 6 mm. The expansion joints of the rails should not be located directly over the gap because of the rotation angle y of the bridge. It is better to adjust the expansion joint on the embankment, at a short distance from the bridge.

Fig.2.4.5-2: Feathered joint


2. Expansion Joints

For bridges without a ballast bed the gap between the bridge and the abutment normally stays uncovered. For bridges with a ballast bed there are two possibilities: a) to enclose the ballast within the bridge and on the embankment, bridging the gap only by the rails. This construction causes problems to the automatic track ballast tamping machine. b) to build a continuous ballast bed by means of elastic rubber (neoprene) joints or by sliding cover plates. In this case there is no interruption of the ballast bed and no problem for the tamping machine. On the other hand the compactness of the ballast increases and decreases with the expansion in the area of the expansion joint of the rails. A completely different design philosophy is to install no special expansion devices on bridges with a continuous ballast bed as described above (and, sometimes, with normal bolted rails joints). If high forces caused by temperature-induced expansion or shortening of the bridge occur in the rail, the track will move in the longitudinal direction and will become settled by itself, especially under the vibrations of the passing trains. The forces between the track and the bridge have to be considered especially for the design of the longitudinally fixed bearing(s) of the bridge. ENV 1991-3 gives the longitudinal action per track FTk = 8 [kN/m] (LT1-LT2), where LTi are the expansion lengths from the fixed bearing.


Materials for expansion joints

2.5.1 Steel parts Normally, the supporting members such as edge elements, rails and cross beams are made of mild steel protected by coating or of corrosion-resistant steel. The stirrups of the fixing are curved reinforcing bars. Stainless steel is used for moveable parts like the bolts of a folding trellis linkage and sliding plates connected with PTFE. Members that are difficult to access, e.g. niches for linkage elements, also are made of stainless steel or corrosion-resistant steel. Steel parts embedded in concrete outside of the zone of carbonation, corrosion-resistant steel and stainless steel do not need any protection against corrosion. Parts made of mild steel must be protected. Coatings must have a sufficiently high resistance against mechanical stress, temperature actions, oils, and de-icing salt. The coating should be chosen in accordance with the appropriate national standards. However, a coating consisting of a two-component epoxy priming coat with zinc dust and a twocomponent epoxy final coat with micaceous iron ore is recommended. Steel parts embedded within the zone of carbonation need only a priming coat. A protection against corrosion by means of an elastomeric sheathing is possible if the elastomeric material satisfies the requirements of resistance and durability. In the case of protection by galvanising, hot-dip galvanising is the normal case. Spray galvanising is expensive but also possible.

2.5 Materials for expansion joints


2.5.2 Elastomeric parts Elastomeric parts must be resistant to environmental influences, de-icing salt, alkaline and acidic water. They are classified in two categories (load transferring and non-load transferring). Load transferring elements (e.g. cushion elements or elastic bearings of the rails) are made from polychloroprene or from natural caoutchouc. The material must be ageresisting, despite the presence of de-icing salt. Non-load transferring elements (e.g. sealings) are made from polychloroprene or from ethylene-propylene-caoutchouc with high resistance to tearing and to crack propagation. The thickness should not be below 4 mm. The following table gives the recommended characteristics of applied elastomers. Characteristic Hardness Resistance to tearing Tearing strain Resistance to crack propagation Behaviour after a temperature stress (14d;70C) Change of hardness Change of resistance to tearing Change of tearing strain Resistance against potassium chloride (solution: 4%; 14d;23C) Change of volume Change of hardness Resistance against hot asphaltic bitumen (30 minutes; 220 C) Change of resistance to tearing Change of tearing strain Bond with steel Non-load transferring elements 55-65 Shore A min. 10 N / m m 2 min. 350 % min. 10 N / m m Load transferring elements 60-70 Shore A min. 15 N / m m 2 min. 400 % min. 15 N / m m

max. +7 Shore A max. -20 % max. -20 %

max. +5 Shore A max. -15 % max. -20 %

max. +10% max. -5 Shore A

max. +10% max. -5 Shore A

max. -20 % max.-20%

max. -20 % max. -20 % Failure within the elastomeric material

Tab.2.5.2-1: Recommended characteristics of the elastomeric parts The springs of spring-linked multiple seal expansion joints are made of polyurethane with a high resistance to crack propagation. The material is able to withstand high strains. It can be compressed down to 20 % of the original length. A further advantage is the good damping characteristics.


2. Expansion Joints

Asphaltic plug joints are made of a special modified asphaltic material. This must have a sufficient flexibility to absorb the movements of the gap, combined with a sufficient load bearing capacity. The exact composition of the material depends on the producer. However, the binder material usually consists of bitumens modified with plasticizers and polymers. The aggregates, usually, belong to the basalt group.


Analysis and design of expansion joints

2.6.1 Buried expansion joints and asphaltic plug joints Expansion joints have to satisfy the requirements of ultimate limit state and fatigue strength design. A buried expansion joint or an asphaltic plug joint must only fulfil the construction requirements given in chapter 2.4. The most important rules are: - The thickness of the asphaltic layer should be at least 80 mm. - The asphaltic layer over the supporting construction must have the same thickness as over the superstructure and over the abutment. - The length of asphaltic plug joints shall not exceed 700 mm. Thin cover plates should be verified by a calculation. The spread of the load can be considered by an angle of 45 (fig.2.6.1-1).

Fig.2.6.1-1: Load spread under a wheel 2.6.2 Single seal and multiple seal expansion joints In most cases the ultimate limit state of a single seal and of a multiple seal expansion joint is analysed correctly, while the fatigue was only considered empirically. However, damage is usually caused by fatigue. Therefore a correct analysis is essential [18; 19]. The loading acts for a very short time. The probability that the axles of two vehicles are at the expansion joint at the same time is relatively small and only one axle need be considered. As a rule, standards contain a design load of the following type to analyse single members of a bridge.

2.6 Analysis and design of expansion joints


LR Contact length wheel - carriageway surface R Static load

Dynamic factor

Fig.2.6.2-1: Design wheel load One rail of an expansion joint carries only the portion F v . k . s t a t of the load, depending on the rail width b, the gap width s and the contact length LR (fig.2.6.2-4).

Fig.2.6.2-2: Factor aa

Fig.2.6.2-3: Arrangement of the wheel loads

Fig.2.6.2-4: Load per rail

LN Si n b Fv.k.stat aa Effective contact length Gap width Number of gaps within the contact length Rail width Portion of wheel load

2. Expansion Joints

Factor of the influence of the angle between expansion joint and driving direction (fig.2.6.2-2)

If a 9 0 the two wheels of the axle do not cause the maximum loading on the rail at the same time. This fact can be considered by reducing the influence of both wheel loads by the factor a . Horizontal wheel loads result from rolling friction, acceleration and braking forces, and from the slope of the bridge. Accelerating and braking of a lorry at the expansion joint cause maximum loads but this is a comparatively rare case and, thus, is consi dered only for the ultimate limit state analysis. Horizontal forces due to rolling friction act at each overrunning and exert an influence on the fatigue of the material. Ultimate limit state The ultimate limit state is analysed with the single wheel loads of an axle and consid ering the dynamic factors given in the relevant standards.

The acceleration and braking force are determined from the vertical loading. Edge profiles and their fixing are designed for a horizontal force due to the full wheel load. Intermediate profile: Edge profile:

Coefficient of static friction of the standard Vertical and horizontal dynamic factor Contrary to the fatigue analysis, for ULS verifications a horizontally and vertically fixed continuous girder is a suitable model of the rails. Rails and support beams can be calculated with the E-P or P-P method because actually no yielding occurs due to the high applicable design loads. The ultimate limit state is analysed using the semiprobabilistic safety concept as follows:

2.6 Analysis and design of expansion joints


Fatigue design Failure due to fatigue is the main reason for the observed damage. Three types of fatigue fractures have been observed (fig.2.6.2-5): 1) Failure of the welded joint between rail and support beam 2) Failure of the support beam 3) Failure of the rail

Fig.2.6.2-5: Possible cracks due to fatigue For the fatigue design, the stress range is of interest. At first it is determined by using the loads given in the standards. The horizontal forces due to rolling friction, slope of bridge and acceleration or de celeration must be considered. However, they are smaller than the horizontal force due to acceleration and braking. The factor consists of three parts: Factor due to slope Factor due to rolling friction Factor due to locomotive acceleration/deceleration

Fig.2.6.2-6: Determination of the factors


2. Expansion Joints

The vertical load acting on an intermediate or edge profile is F v . k . s t a t . The horizontal loads are determined as follows: Intermediate profile: F h.k.stat = .F v . k . s t a t Edge profile: Fh.k.stat = . R v . k . s t a t

Fig.2.6.2-7: Dynamic loading of a rail The contact time t1 of the wheel depends on the contact length LR, the velocity v and the width of the profile b.

The impact load is sine-shaped

half period). The circular frequency is:

The impact causes a damped sinusoidal vibration (fig.2.6.2-8). For the ultimate limit state analysis the response in the fundamental mode of the system is of interest. It is considered by the dynamic value given in the applicable standards. Fatigue of material is caused by the stress range. Normally, only the first and second amplitude of F v.k.dyn exceed the constant amplitude fatigue limit.

2.6 Analysis and design of expansion joints


Fig.2.6.2-8: Dynamic loading and response of system

Fig.2.6.2-9: Dynamic model

The static bending moments in the vertical direction can be determined on the supported continuous beam. It depends on the stiffness of the springs if it has to be taken into account or if the springs can be assumed to be rigid. In the horizontal direction the consideration of the elastic fixing is essential (fig. 2.6.2-10).



Fig.2.6.2-10: Vertical and horizontal static system


2. Expansion Joints

It is important to use the dynamic stiffness of the springs because it differs from the static value. Both the spring stiffness and the damping coefficient are determined by overrun-tests. The frequency fh and the damping coefficient can be determined from the recorded time-deformation curve. The spring stiffness ch.dyn in the model is varied until the lowest natural frequency according to the experiments is observed. The logarithmic decrement D of the damping coefficient of a spring-linked expansion joint amounts to approximately 10%. Further possibilities to determine the lowest natural frequency are an analysis by FEM or approximate methods. The following method leads to satisfactory solutions. The fundamental vibration mode shape of the vertical direction can be described by the static bending line of a continuous girder.

A sinusoidal loading causes the following bending deflection curve:

The following formula leads to the stiffness of the spring:

The application of the formulae of the frequency and the rotational frequency leads to the natural frequency of the vertical system:

With known ch.dyn and equal span widths the frequency fh of the horizontal direction can be determined in the same way. But the system is an elastically-supported continuous girder. The following figures show some calculated results.

2.6 Analysis and design of expansion joints


Fig.2.6.2-11: Lowest natural frequencies of an elastically supported continuous gird er m Mass of rail [kg/m] Ih Moment of inertia [m4] fh Lowest natural frequency [Hz] The dynamic values 1 and 2 of the first and second modes of the system are added to the value . With an assumed logarithmic damping coefficient of 10%, the fol lowing diagrams give directly the impact factors (fig.2.6.2-12). Either the first or second figure can be used. They are suitable for the vertical and horizontal direction. L Single span [m]

Ch.dyn Dynamic stiffness of spring [N/m]


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.6.2-12: Dynamic factors The horizontal axis of the diagram (b) contains the natural frequency of the system. This version shows the frequency of resonance as the maximum of the graph of the de sign velocity. The values of the resonance frequency are comparatively high. Nat ural system frequencies near the resonance must be avoided at least for the vertical bending. The recommended distance from the resonance frequency is also indicated in the diagram. With a known design velocity a maximum span of the rails can be de termined. Longer spans cause higher values , leading to a higher stress range. An other disadvantage is an increasing number of stress cycles exceeding the cut-off lim it, which means that more than.two modes of the system must be considered. With the values v and h the dynamic difference moments can be calculated.

The stress range is determined as follows:

The design load of an axle is higher than the actual load. The nominal stresses should be reduced by the factor fred to get the actual design loads. The value of the factor depends on the ratio between design load and loading due to the real traffic situation. The determination of the actual traffic situation requires extensive data for the real loads and their frequency (fig.2.6.2-13). Infrequent high loads exert an advantageous influence on the fatigue behaviour (overloading effect). The maximum load for fatigue design must be determined considering the real fre quency of the actual traffic loads (e.g. there may be load components occurring only in one of a thousand cases). Instead of the nominal stress also the design load could be reduced.

2.6 Analysis and design of expansion joints



Example of a typical loading sequence

The stress ranges up to the chosen limit are used to determine a constant amplitude stress range that causes the same damage (fig.2.6.2-15).

Fig.2.6.2-14: Fatigue strength curve

Fig.2.6.2-15: stress range

Constant amplitude

This value when compared with the stress range k.max.dyn provides the factor that al lows the fatigue analysis with design loads given in the standards to be used. For in stance, [20] recommends the factor fred = 0.75 for the conditions of traffic in Germany, to be applied to the loads of German Standard DIN 1072. A maximum stress deter mined in this way is exceeded in only one of a thousand cases. The fatigue design has to fulfil the following equation:

Partial safety factor of the fatigue loading (YFf = 1.0) Partial safety factor of fatigue strength (YMf = 1.15) Constant amplitude stress range for 100 million cycles


2. Expansion Joints

Can be ascertained by the analyses of the real sequence us ing the Palmgren-Miner summation (100 0.4). Fatigue strength for 100 million cycles The construction members of the expansion joint are three-dimensional and compact. The fatigue strength L can be taken from the standard used if it contains a suitable detail category, otherwise tests become necessary. The following testing arrangements were recently used with success (fig.2.6.2-16). The required number of tests is nor mally indicated by the standards.

Fig.2.6.2-16: Recommended arrangement of the tests The lifetime of a construction can be calculated as a statistical value. It is only appli cable for the evaluation of that type of construction.

Design life - time in years The number of cycles exceeding the cut-off limit The average of daily lorry traffic in one direction The average number of axles of each lorry The distribution of the DTLV on several lanes p = 1.0 in case of one lane p = 0.85 in case of two lanes p = 0.80 in case of three or more lanes 2.6.3 Elastomeric cushion joint The loads for the ultimate limit state analysis and the reduced loads for the fatigue analysis are determined in the same way as for the seal expansions joints. In the verti cal direction the analysed element transfers a portion of the wheel load, depending on the zone of influence. Horizontal loads are determined from the vertical loads using the factor ,. Intermediate profile: Edge profile:

2.6 Analysis and design of expansion joints


The horizontal loading of edge profiles and their fixings are analysed considering the complete wheel load. Edge profiles and fixings can be analysed in the same way as for multiple seal joints. A possible intermediate profile can be treated as a single span beam (fig.2.6.3-1).

Fig.2.6.3-1: Calculation of the intermediate profile The elastomeric parts of elastomeric cushion joints have to withstand stresses and stress ranges due to traffic loads. Their strength can be ascertained by tests. The fol lowing testing arrangement is recommended.

Fig.2.6.3-2: Recommended arrangement of the test The specimen is of the same character as the planned construction and has a length of at least 1200 mm. The loads are applied through an elastomeric disk of 50 mm thick ness which is situated in the middle of the cushion element. LR and BR are the dimen sions of the load area according to the applicable standard. If the width of sample is smaller than LR, only a reduced load acts on the joint construction. It can be consi dered by a smaller disk and a force than P. The inclination of P depends on the factor . It considers the sliding friction or the roller friction, the slope of the bridge and the locomotive's acceleration and is different for the ultimate limit and fatigue tests. The applied force P has the following value for the ultimate limit test:


2. Expansion Joints

P = Fv.k.stat Fv.k.stat Wheel load of the standard For the fatigue test the loads are reduced by the factor fred. Pred = fred P The construction is applicable if experiments prove that the full load P can be supported as a static load, the reduced load Pred for 2 millions of cycles. 2.6.4 Cantilever-toothed joint and rolling leaf joint The Bernoulli-Euler theory of bending gives correct results provided that the height to length ratio of a beam is at least 1/5. Fingers of cantilever-toothed joints are often not within this range. If this requirement is satisfied the ultimate load can be calculated easily. Otherwise tests become essential. The fatigue behaviour must be determined by tests anyway because of the three dimensional character of the connection cantilever / edge element. The testing arrangement and the applied loads are the same as for cushion joints (fig.2.6.4-1). Maximum stresses are caused when the joint expansion is maximum.

Fig. 2.6.4-1: Recommended arrangement of the test The behaviour of a rolling leaf joint should be checked in the same way. In most cases neither the application of the Bernoulli-Euler theory of bending is possible nor do the standards contain suitable detail categories for the fatigue design. The loads must be placed in the most disadvantageous position.


Installation of expansion joints

The design of an expansion joint is performed by determination of the extreme values of the expected movements and the position of installation. The installation data depends on the planned construction sequence. The expansion joint is adjusted by means of an auxiliary construction. For a spring linkage prestressing is necessary (fig.2.7-1). It is recommended to instal the expansion joint in the early morning when the temperature is distributed almost uniformly over the whole bridge.

2.7 Installation of expansion joints


Immediately before the installation the actual temperature of the bridge is measured. If it is not within the considered tolerance the adjustment must be corrected. After that the expansion joint is flushed and fixed temporarily. In the case of a steel bridge it is provisionally bolted or tack-welded. The auxiliary construction must be removed im mediately. After carrying out the final fixing, the protection against corrosion is com pleted. In concrete bridges the expansion joints are provisionally fixed by welding together reinforcement and anchoring. The concrete pour should be at least of the same strength as the adjacent material of the superstructure. While pouring the concrete the joint construction should be protected by a cover.

Fig.2.7-1: Possible auxiliary construction for the installation In the case of a steel bridge the date of installing the expansion joints has no influence on the expected range of movement. In the case of a concrete bridge or a composite bridge, single unidirectional movements (shortening due to creep and shrinkage) oc cur. These movements begin with the erecting of the construction and stop within some weeks / months / years. Creep is caused by compressive stresses, especially due to prestressing. The movement due to prestessing forces occurs during the prestressing work. The joint construction has to accommodate the movements which occur af ter the installation. Therefore, the dimension and, by this, the costs of a joint con struction can be reduced by a late installation. The variation of creep and shrinkage is shown in the following figures by means of the coefficient of creep (,t0) and the shrinkage value SC. In various standards, t = 5 years ( 1800 days) to t = 20 years is set equal to t = .


2. Expansion Joints

Fig.2.7-3: Variation of creep

Fig.2.7-4: Variation of shrinkage

The maximum increments of shrinkage and creep occur immediately after completion or after prestressing. For example after 100 days (about 3 months), about 50 % of the expected creep deformations and 25 % of the shrinkage deformation have taken place.


Inspection and maintenance

Expansion joints should be checked regularly by means of visual inspection. The frequency depends on the sensitivity of the construction. Before the inspection the joint is cleaned, and cover-plates may need to be removed. The check should involve the following items: - Damage of the anticorrosive protection. This should be repaired before advanced rust formations appear. The new coating must be compatible with the existing one. - Visible cracks due to fatigue in the steel members. - Damages to the seals. The soiled water of the carriageway can lead to the deterioration and corrosion of the bearings, the substructure and possible the linkages. - Workability of the linkage. If it does not fulfil its function, damage of the seals may result. - Obstruction or damage of the drainage system. The adjacent carriageway pavement should also be checked. A jutting joint construction due to wheelers enhances the impact loading. If it is not possible to repair the entire pavement, asphalt ramps should be erected to protect the joints. Service-free expansion joints are often demanded by the manufacturers. Nevertheless, it is recommended to clean the gaps from grit and silt to protect seals and linkage. The drainage should also be cleaned regularly.

2.9 Replacement of expansion joints



Replacement of expansion joints

The lifetime of an expansion joint should be the same as the lifetime of the carriageway pavement. A complete replacement becomes necessary if the steel parts exhibit advanced fatigue damage. On steel bridges only the bolted or welded connections are removed. A replacement on concrete bridges is more expensive. More frequent is the replacement of single members, especially of the elastomer components. Seals should be replaceable from the carriageway site. Manufacturers offer different systems for easy replacement (fig.2.9-1).

Fig. 2.9-1: Possible fixings to the seal The gap width must be opened to at least 25 mm. In the case of an elastic linkage, smaller widths are possible because the rails can be displaced. On the other hand the seals must not be stretched fully. Expansion joints for large movements should be accessible from the underside to change members of the linkage like elastomeric springs. In the case of a road with several lanes it is desirable to change the seals of the expansion joint in sections. It is possible to join the seals by vulcanization on site. If a replacement of the rails becomes necessary they can also be joined on site. However, the joints should be situated in zones with minimal stress range and must be welded very carefully because of the high fatigue loads.


2. Expansion Joints



Books about expansion joints for bridges: Lee D.J.: Bridge Bearings and Expansion Joints. Second edition by E & FN Spon, London, Glasgow, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras 1994.

Papers: [1] Price, A.R. (1982): The service performance of fifty buried type expansion joints. TRRL Report SR 740, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [2] Price, A.R. (1983): The performance of nosing type bridge deck expansion joints. TRRL Report LR 1071, Transport and Road Research Laboratory Crowthorne. [3] Price, A.R. (1984): The performance in service of bridge expansion joints. TRRL Report LR 1104, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne. [4] Department of Transport (1989): Expansion joints for use in highway bridge decks. Departmental Standard BD 33/88. [5] Department of Transport (1989): Expansion joints for use in highway bridge decks. Departmental Advice Note BA 26/88. [6] Koster W. (1969): Expansion Joints in Bridges and Concrete Roads. Maclaren and Sons. [7] Busch, G.A. (1986): A review of design practice and performance of finger joints. Paper presented to the 2nd World Congress on Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, San Antonio, Texas, September. [8] Watson, S.C. (1972): A review of past performance and some new considerations in the bridge expansion joint scene. Paper presented to regional meetings of the AASHO Committee on Bridges and Structures, Spring. [9] Koster W. (1986): The principle of elasticity for expansion joints. Paper presented to 2nd World Congress on Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, San Antonio, Texas, September. [10] Lee, DJ. (1971): The Theory and Practice of Bearings and Expansion Joints for Bridges, Cement and Concrete Association. [11] Demers, C.E. and Fisher, J.W., Fatigue Cracking of Steel Bridge Structures, Volume 1: A Survey of Localized Cracking in Steel Bridges - 1981 to 1988, FHWA Publication No. FHWA-RD-89-166, McLean, VA, 1990 [12] Standard Specifications For Highway Bridges. 15th edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1992 [13] Tschemmernegg, F., The Design of Modular Expansion Joints, Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Toronto, 1991. [14] Dexter, R.J., Kaczinski, M.R., and Fisher, J.W; Fatigue Testing of Modular Expansion Joints for Bridges, Proceeding of the 1995 IABSE Symposium, Volume 73/2, San Francisco, CA, 1995. [15] TL/TP-F 92, Technische Liefer- und Prfvorschriften fr wasserundurchlssige Fahrbahnbergnge von Strassen- und Wegbrcken. Bonn: Bundesministerium fr Verkehr, Ausg. 1992

2.10 References


[16] Richtlinie - RVS 15.45, Brckenausrstung - bergangskonstruktion. Wien: Forschungsgesellschaft fr das Verkehrs- und Strassenwesen, Arbeitsgruppe Brckenbau, Arbeitsausschuss Brckenausrstung, Ausg. Januar 1995. [17] Braun, Chr.: Verkehrslastbeanspruchung von bergangskonstruktionen in Strassenbrcken. Bauingenieur 67 (1992), P. 229-237. [18] Tschemmemegg, F. (a.o.): Ermdungsnachweis von Fahrbahnbergngen nach ENV-1993-1. Stahlbau (1995), P. 202-210. [19] Pattis, A.: Dynamische Bemessung von wasserdichten FahrbahnbergngenModulsysteme (Dynamic Design of Waterproof Modular Expansion Joints). Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Innsbruck, Austria (Dec. 1993). [20] Herleitung eines Lastmodells fr den Betriebsfestigkeitsnachweis von Straenbrcken. Forschung Strassenbau und Strassenverkehrstechnik Heft 430, 1984. [21 ] Ramberger, G.: Bearings, expansion joints and hydraulic equipment for bridges, IABSE, 15. Kongress-Bericht Copenhagen, 1996. [22] Fisher, J.W., Kaczinski, M.R. and Dexter, R.J.. Field and Laboratory Experience with Expansion Joints. IABSE, 15. Kongress-Bericht Copenhagen, 1996. [23] Braun, C: The Design of Modular Joints for Movements up to 2000 mm. IABSE, 15. Kongress-Bericht Copenhagen, 1996. [24] Nielsen, H.B.: The Storebaelt West Bridge. Railway Expansion Joints. IABSE, 15. Kongress-Bericht Copenhagen, 1996. [25] Crocetti, Roberto: Modular Bridge Expansion Joints - Loads, Dynamic Behaviour and Fatigue Performance. Thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Engineering. Department of Structural Engineering, Division of Steel and Timber Structures. Chalmers University of Technology, 1998. [26] Barnard, C.P., Cuninghame, J.R.: Practical guide to the use of bridge expansion joints. Application guide 29, Transport research laboratory, UK 1997.


Structural Engineering Documents

Structural Engineering Documents (SED) is IABSE's distinguished series of book-length monographs. So far, six volumes have been published in the SED series, all written by acknowledged experts in their fields. Each SED volume examines a basic structural engineering problem. This fundamental approach, together with high scientific standards, assures the lasting value of SED volumes for practitioners, students and teachers of structural engineering. IABSE maintains a backlist of this series, which to date includes:

SED 1: Concrete Box-Girder Bridges

Jrg SCHLAICH, Hartmut SCHEEF German: ISBN-3-85748-032-7,105 pages; 1982 English: ISBN-3-85748-031-9, 108 pages; 1982, out of print The concrete box-girder, a widely used bridge superstructure system, is comprehensively examined in this informative volume. Emphasis is placed on practical guidelines for the actual design of concrete box-girder bridges. The monograph follows the sequence of the bridge design process itself: Part 1, Design, covers design principles, and construction methods as they influence design, for substructures, superstructures and complete systems; Part 2, Structural Analysis, examines general analysis procedures and a wide range of structural parameters, with particular attention given to eccentric vehicle loads; Part 3, Dimensioning and Detailing, discusses prestressing, flange and web dimensioning, diaphragms, abutments, construction joints, bearings, piers and bridge finishes. The attempt of the authors is to provide the design engineer with a compact guide to the essential parameters for the design and analysis of concrete box-girder bridges. Each part has its own list of references, and each proceeds from general principles to specific problems.

SED 2: Dynamic Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings

Hajime UMEMURA, Haruo TAKIZAWA ISBN 3-85748-029-7, 64 pages; 1982, out of print The performance of reinforced concrete building structures subjected to earthquake-induced motions is the subject of this SED volume. The book emphasises formulations of a basically empirical nature to analyse the complexities inherent in the inelastic and hysteretic response of reinforced concrete structures.



SED 3: Vibrations in Structures Induced by Man and Machines

Hugo BACHMANN, Walter AMMANN English: ISBN 3-85748-052-X, 176 pages; 1987 German: ISBN 3-85748-051-3, 193 pages; 1987, out of print This SED volume shows where dynamic problems can occur in structures and presents appropriate countermeasures. Evenly divided between theory and case studies, the monograph first surveys the broad topic of structural dynamics. Various load categories are defined, followed by an account of "source-dependent" effects from human activity, machine operation, wind, water, earthquakes, traffic, and explosions. Man-induced vibrations are considered, looking at dynamic loading arising from walking, running and other forms of movement, while machine-induced vibrations are examined according to type (rotating, oscillating, impacting). For both types of vibrations possible countermeasures are proposed. The second part of the book presents 22 case studies of a wide range of structures: footbridges, sports halls, halls for pop concerts, diving platforms, and eight industrial structures with machine-induced vibration problems. The final section discusses the fundamentals of vibration theory to assure that the reader has an adequate understanding of the problems presented.

SED 4: Ship Collision with Bridges

The Interaction between Vessel Traffic and Bridge Structures Ole Damgaard LARSEN ISBN 3-85748-079-3; 131 pages; 1993 This SED volume is aimed at engineers responsible for the planning, design and assessment of bridges crossing navigation channels. It is a comprehensive source of information on the risks of ship collisions with bridges and presents methods to evaluate the safety of bridges, people and the environment. It emphasises collision prevention and identifies measures for the protection of structural parts of bridges in the event of ship collision. The monograph also offers advice on the upgrading and retrofitting of existing bridges and navigation channels. After reviewing some basics of navigation and vessel traffic, and considering collision risk and risk acceptance, the volume focuses on vessel impact forces on bridges and proposes appropriate design criteria. Collision prevention measures such as regulations and navigation channel management systems are also addressed.



SED 5: Introduction to Safety and Reliability of Structures

Jrg SCHNEIDER ISBN 3-85748-106-4; 138 pages; 1997 Structural engineers devote all their effort to meeting society's expectations efficiently. Engineers and scientists work together to develop methods for solving engineering problems. Given that nothing is absolutely safe, the discussion of safety can only be in terms of (acceptably small) failure probabilities. Starting from this premise, reliability theory emerged and has become part of the science and practice of engineering today. Its application is not only with respect to the safety of structures, but also in regard to serviceability and other requirements of technical systems that are all subject to some probability of failure. The present volume takes a broad approach to the safety of structures and related topics. The first chapter introduces the reader to the main concepts and reviews strategies for identifying and mitigating hazards. The second chapter is devoted to processing diverse data into information that can be used in reliability analysis. The third chapter deals with the modelling of structures, and the fourth presents recognised methods of reliability theory. Another chapter focuses on problems related to establishing target reliabilities, assessing existing structures, and the need for effective strategies against human error. The appendix supports the application of the methods proposed and refers readers to a number of related computer programs. This book is aimed at both students and practising engineers. It presents the concepts and procedures of reliability analysis in a straightforward, understandable way, making use of simple examples, rather than extended theoretical discussion. It is hoped that this approach serves to advance the application of safety and reliability analysis in engineering practice. You may order SED monographs, or get information on other IABSE publications, directly from: IABSE, ETH Hnggerberg, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Phone: +41-1-633 2647 Fax: +41-1-633 1241 E-mail: secretariat@iabse.ethz.ch Web: http://www.iabse.ethz.ch


Structural Engineering Documents

Objective: To provide in-depth information to practicing structural engineers in the form of reports of high scientific and technical standards on a wide range of structural engineering topics. Topics: Structural analysis and design, dynamic analysis, construction materials and methods, project management, structural monitoring, safety assessment, maintenance and repair, and computer applications. Readership: Practicing structural engineers, teachers, researchers and students at university level, as well as representatives of owners, operators and builders. Publisher: The International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) was founded as a non-profit scientific association in 1929. Today, it has more than 4200 members in over 100 countries. lABSE's mission

is to promote the exchange

of knowledge and to advance the practice of structural engineering worldwide. IABSE organizes conferences and publishes the quarterly journal Structural Engineering International, as well as conference reports and other monographs, including the SED series. IABSE also presents annual awards for achievements in structural engineering. For further information: IABSE ETH Hnggerberg CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Phone: +41-1-633 2647 Fax: +41-1-633 1241 E-mail: secretariat@iabse.ethz.ch http://www.iabse.ethz.ch

Structural Bearings and Expansion Joints for Bridges

Bridge superstructures have to be designed to permit thermal and live load strains to occur without unintended restraints. Bridge bearings have to transfer forces from the superstructure to the substructure, allowing all movements in directions defined by the designer. The two functions transfer the loads and allow movements only in the required directions for a long service time with little maintenance - are not so easy to fulfil. Different bearings for different purposes and requirements have been developed so, that the bridge designer can choose the most suitable bearing. By the movement of a bridge, gaps are necessary between superstructure and substructure. Expansion joints fill the gaps, allowing traffic loads to be carried and allowing all expected displacements with low resistance. Expansion joints should provide a smooth transition, avoid noise emission as far as possible and withstand all mechanical actions and chemical attacks (de-icing) for a long time. A simple exchange of all wearing parts and of the entire expansion joint should be possible. The present volume provides a comprehensive survey of arrangement, construction and installation of bearings and expansion joints for bridges including calculation of bearing reactions and movements, analysis and design, inspection and maintenance. A long list of references deals with the subjects but also with aspects in the vicinity of bearings and expansion joints. This book is aimed at both students and practising engineers, working in the field of bridge design, construction, analysis, inspection, maintenance and repair.