167

4)

<>

. ,
, ,
.

.
. ,
, ,

.
-- .

.
3 1
.
.
.
.

: , , , ,

* , . tanhee@hs.ac.kr
4 1(2011) pp. 167-203

2011

168

4 1(2011)

1.
80
(Said)

. (Bhabha)
, (Fanon) . (Spivak)
.
. , ,

. .
.
, ,
, , 3 .

.
.

(Dirlik, 2001).

.


. (Dirlik)

.

169

(Dilrik, 1998: 126).

(, 1998:
126).
(, 2011,
).

.

/
. /

(, 2010: 121).

.

?
?

. ,
,

.

170

4 1(2011)

.
/

.
. .


.


.

. ,


.

.

.

.

.

171

2.


,
.
(post)
. /

.
,
.


,

.
,
postcolonialism (post)
.
/
.


.

172

4 1(2011)

.

, /
.
, ,
.
,

. , ,
, , ,
.
/ .


.
, ,
, .
. ,
, ,
. , , ,
.
, ,
,
.
.

173

, ,
.
, ,
() .
(, ,
, , (JanMohamed), (Ahmad),
(Achebe), (Thiong o), (Parry))
.

,
. /


.
.
,
,
.
. , , ,
.

.

Location of Culture

, ( Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of

Colonial Discourse )
.
.

174

4 1(2011)

(camouflage).
. .
(technique of camouflage)
(Bhabha, 1994: 99 ).

.


.


.
. .


(Bhabha, 1994: 92).
.

.
.
,

.
,
.

175

.
,

.

.
.

,


(Bhabha, 1994: 199) .
, ,
.
. ,
,

.
.
(hybridity) .

.

.
3 (hybrid species) .

176

4 1(2011)

, ,
(Ashcroft, 1998: 118).
,
(division) ,
,
.
.
( DissemiNation )
,


. ,
.


.
(Slemon)
(counter- discourse) ,
.



.
, (,
1992: 63).

177

.
.
(, 1992:
65). (Jameson)
3 . 3
1,
3

(,

1992:

63-65). /

.

. 1 2
, 3

(Ashcroft, 1995: 78, ).
,
(Ashcroft, 1995: 80). 1, 2, 3
,

(Ashcroft, 1995: 80). 1 3

3

(Ashcroft, 1995: 80).
.

178

4 1(2011)

( The Economy of Manichean

Allegory )
(JanMohamed, 1985).



(cultural syncretism) .
,
3 (JanMohamed,
1985).
.
.

(disjunctive rewriting)

(Bhabha,

1994: 226)
.

.
, (Bhabha, 1994:
242).

.

.
(transnational) (translational)
.

179

.

(Bhabha, 1994: 149).

3
(Bhabha, 1994: 218).
3 (Third Space enunciations)
(Bhabha, 1994: 38).
(international) .
.
(inscription) (articulation) .
inter .
(in-between space) .
3 (The Third Space)

(Bhabha, 1994: 38-39). 3
,

(Bhabha, 1994: 230-231).

.

,
.
. ,

180

4 1(2011)

.
.
.


.
.
.
.

. , , ,
, ,
.
(, ) ,
(, 1999:
20-21).


(, 1999: 22).
. , , , ,
, ,
.

.
.

181

.

.
. ,
(, 1999: 22-23 ).

. .
.
, ,
.
.

. ,
,
.

.

(, 1999: 22-27).
, , ,
.
,
. ,

182

4 1(2011)

,
. ,
.


.

3.
.
.
.
,
, .

3 ,

(hybridity)

(mockery)
,
.
(Young) .

(Young, 1990: 145).

183

.

.

(Young, 1990: 148).
.

.

,
.
/
.

.

.
, , (Mohanty) .

.
(Ashcroft et al.,
1998: 118).

184

4 1(2011)

(JanMohamed, 1985: 60).

.

(JanMohamed, 1985: 61).

.
.


.

. ?
3
,
. , , ,
.

.

.

?

185

.
,
.

,
. ,
3 , 1 , 1
3 .
3 1
1 .
(Mitchell)

(Ashcroft, 1995, 246). ,
,


1 .
3
. , ,
, ,
.

186

4 1(2011)

1 3
.
3 3,
4 .
(Appiah)
.
,

, (Appiah, 1995: 119) .

.

.

.
3 .

.
.

,
.
.

187

(Eagleton) (Ashcroft et
al., 1995: 244).
,
.
(Mishra) (Hodge)
.

(Mishra and Hodge, 1991: 407).

.


.

(Brydon)
(Hutcheon)
(Ashcroft et al., 1995: 248).



.

, < > .

188

4 1(2011)

,
, .
.


. ,

.

( Remembering Fanon )
.

.

(Parry, 1987: 30).

. 1
.
, ,
.

.
.

.

189

.

3, 4

. 3
,
.
1
.

. 1 3
,
,
.

4.
//
/ ,
.

.

.

190

4 1(2011)

.


.
,
.

.

.
. /, / ,
.
.
/,
.
.


.
/ .
. , ,
,
, , . , ,

191

.
.
,
. ,
, ,
, ,
.
, , .

,
.

. ,

.
(Gordimer), (Morrison)
, ()
. .
/
.
80
.
(Petersen) 1981

192

4 1(2011)

.


( )
(Petersen, 1995: 251-252).
.

.
,

(Petersen, 1995: 252). /
,


.
. (Mnthali)

.
(Petersen, 1995: 252-253) .

!
?






?
, , ,
,
!

193

194

4 1(2011)

60
, , ,

.
,

. (Ibo)
.

,

(Petersen, 1995:
253),
. (Okonkow)

,

(Petersen, 1995: 254).

. (Shiva) (Mies)

3
, ,

195

. , 3
.

.
.
, ,
. ,
1 3 ,

.
. , ,

.
1


.

.

.

.
, .

196

4 1(2011)

. .
. .

. 3, 4
.

.

. / /

.
/
,
, 3, 4
,
.
, 3 ,
.
.
()
. ,
, , ,
.

.

197

. ,
,
,
. , 1 3
3, 4
.
, , (Minhha)
, ,
.

198

4 1(2011)

(2010),
, ,, 23
1, 93-131.
, (1998), ,
,

Dirlik,

A.(1994),

After

the

Revolution Waking to Global Capitalism, New Hampshire:

Wesleyan University Press.
____________(2005), :

Dirlik,

A.(2000), Postmodernity's Histories: the Past as Legacy and

Project, Maryland: Rowman Littlefield Publishers.

, (2005), :
, , : , Mohanty, C. T.(2004),

Feminism Without Borders, London: Duke University Press.

(1996),

: ,

, , , 309-334.
, (1991),, , :
. Said E.(1979), Orientalism, New York: Vintage Books.
________________(1995), , ,
: , Said, E.(1994), Culture and imperialism,
New York: Vintage Books.
, (2011), : ,

Sharp,

J.

P.(2009),

199

Geographies of Postcolonialism: Spaces of Power and

Representation, Los Angeles: SAGE.
, (2008), , , :
, Spivak, G. C.(1987), In Other Worlds: Essays in

Cultural Politics, New York: Routledge.

, (1992),

--

,, 31, 55-67.
, (1999), ,
, : , Thiong o, N. W.(1986), Decolonising

the Mind: the Politics of Language in African Literature,

London: J. Currey.
, (1999),3 :
, , : , Achebe, C.(1990), Hopes

and Impediments: Selected Essays, 1965-1987, New York:

Anchor Books.
(2001), , :
.
(2002),

, ,, 48 3, 691-715.
, 2011.4.4 :
, .
(2010), :
, : .
(2006), :

200

4 1(2011)

,40 ,
(2006.6.9).
(2001), , : .
______(2004), , :
.
, (1998), , , , :
, Fanon, F.(1957), Peau Noire Masques Blancs, Paris:
Editions du Seuil.
Appiah, K. A.(1995), The Postcolonial and the Postmodern , in

Post-colonial Studies Reader, ed. B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths,

and H. Tiffrn London: Routledge, pp. 119-124.
Ashcroft, B, G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin(ed)(1995), Post-colonial

Studies Reader, London: Routledge,

_____________________________________________(1998), Key Concepts

in Post-colonial Studies, London: Routledge.

Bhabha, H. K.(1986), The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination
and the Discourse of Colonialism , in Literature, Politics,

and Theory: Papers from the Essex Conference, 1976-84,

ed. F. Barker, Essex conference on the sociology of
literature, London: Methuen, pp. 148-172.
_____________(1990), Nation and Narration, London: Routledge.
_____________(1994), The Location of Culture, London: Routledge.
Dirlik, A.(2001), Global Modernity: Modernity in the Age of

Global Capitalism, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

JanMohamed, A.(1985),

The Economy of Manichean Allegory:

201

The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature ,

Critical Inquiry, 12, pp. 59-87.

Mishra, V., and B. Hodge(1991),What Is Post(-)Colonialism? ,

Textual Practice, 5(3), pp. 399-414.

Mitchell,

W.

J.

Postcolonial

T.(1995),

Culture,

Postimperial

Criticism , in Post-colonial Studies Reader, ed. B. Ashcroft,

G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin, London: Routledge, pp. 475-479.
Parry, B.(1987),

Problems in Current Theories of Colonial

Discourse , Oxford Literary Review, 9(1-2), pp. 27-58.

Petersen, K. H.(1995), First Things First: Problems of a Feminist
Approach to African Literature , in Post-colonial Studies

Reader, ed. B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin,

London: Routledge, pp. 251-254.
Suleri,

S.(1996),
Postcolonial

Woman

Skin

Condition ,

in

Deep:

Feminism

Contemporary

and

the

Postcolonial

Theory: A Reader, ed. P, Mongia, London: Arnold,

pp.

335-346.
Young, R. J. C.(1990), White Mythologies: Writing, History and

the West, London: Routledge.

: 2011 5 12
: 2011 5 26
: 2011 6 10

202

4 1(2011)

<Abstract>

The Post-colonial Resistance Strategy

and Feminism
Gaphee Ko
This

article

aims

to

review

the

resistance

strategy

of

post-colonialism and see its meaning and limitation. It presents

mimicry,

counter-

discourse,

translation

and

refusing

imperial

language as the examples of post-colonial resistance strategies. Homi

Bhabha

suggests

that

mimicry ,

translation ,

the

third-space,

hybridity can be interpreted as a location of subject-other where the

resistance

is

embedded.

counter-discourse

is

Stephen

one

of

the

Slemon
crucial

points

resisting

out

that

strategy

of

post-colonial period. Talking back as counter-discourse is a way

of

changing

the

direction

of

dominant

discourse

of

imperialism/colonialism. Ngugi wa Thiong o s choice of refusing

English

as

his

language

is another

example

of post-colonial

resistance strategy.
This

article

also

aims

to

see

the

relationship

between

post-colonialism and feminism. To do this it examines some

positions that criticize above mentioned post-colonial strategies. The
criticism lies in their culturally-oriented specificity and the lack of
polito-economic concern. It extends its criticism to their non-critical
position

about

global

capitalism,

neo-colonialism

and

even

contemporary imperialism. It criticizes that post-colonial resistance

203

strategies are even accommodating with the present capitalism or

neo-colonialism. It criticizes that post-colonialists neglect capitalism
by concentrating on anti-Eurocentrism.
Feminism can be supported and expanded by the post-colonial
strategies in its interest in Eurocentrism and imperialism. It can be
supported by its interest in race.

And feminism can provide the

insight of gender and sexuality. Especially post-colonial feminists,

such as Spivak and Mohanty, provide the conceptual frame of
race-class-gender. However, the meaning of post-colonial resistance
strategies requires examination because of the above criticism and
the lack of gender/sexuality frame. To move further from the
present post-colonial strategies, it is necessary to examine the
relationship between post-colonialism and feminism. And based on
this, the reviewing of post-colonial feminism shall be followed. It is
for finding a better direction of present feminism and feminist
movement.
KEY WORDS: postcolonialism, cultural resistance strategy,
counter-discourse, translation