Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
WORKS DEPARTMENT
C O N S U L T I N G
Engineers Group Ltd. Jaipur
E-12, Moji Colony, Malviya Nagar , Jaipur, Raj.
+ 91-141-2520899, Telefax +91-141-2521348
E-mail : ceg@cegindia.com URL : www.cegindia.com
INDEX
Sl. No.
Title
Pages
1-2
Introduction
Bridge at Ch:11/600
(i)
1 - 25
(ii)
Design of Superstructure
1-1
Bridge at Ch:29/500
(i)
1 - 48
(ii)
Design of Superstructure
1-1
INTRODUCTION
The work of detailed feasibility & preparation of Detailed Project Report has been awarded to M/S
Consulting Engineers Group by client, The Chief Engineer (World Bank), Project Implementation
Units & OWD, Bhubaneswar, vide agreement No.1 of 2005-06 dated 28/10/05
This report presents the detailed design report for bridges from Berhampur-Rayagada road on SH17.from 0.0 km to 41.0 km. In this stretch, there are 10 nos of existing bridges. The final
recommendation after analyzing the data based on detailed inventory & condition assessment, NDT
testing, horizontal alignment, hydrological study, geo-technical investigations, vertical alignment &
decision taking during site visit with PIU officials.
Geo-technical report, NDT reports & site visit report has already been submitted. The final
recommendations after incorporating the above report are summarized in Table appended in next
page.
The overall width of new construction has been kept as 12.0 m with or without footpath with clear
carriageway width of 11.0 m in case of bridge without footpath and 7.5 m in case of bridges with
footpath. Footpath has been provided for all major bridge and minor bridge lying in village vicinity.
The design of superstructure for RCC girder type bridge has been given as per STANDARD
PLANS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES ( R.C.C. T-Beam and Slab superstructure).
The design of superstructure for Solid slab type bridge has been given as per STANDARD
DRAWINGS FOR ROAD BRIDGES ( R.C.C. Solid slab superstructure ( 15 and 30 skew).span 4.0
m to 10.0 m ( With and without footpath)
The substructure has been design using in-house software in Standard excel sheet.
The following code of practice has been referred in the designs.
1. IRC : 21-2000
2. IRC : 6-2004
3. IRC : 78-2000
4. SP : 13-2004
5. IRC : 89-1997
6. IRC : 83-1987
7. Specification for Road and Bridges works (MOST Book)
Sl
No
Location/
Chainage
Existing
Span
Arrangeme
nt
Existing
Carriage
way width
1/915
2 x 6.6
4/400
3 x 6.75
Type of Bridge
Recommended for
Proposed Span
Arrangement
Type of foundation
Type of
substructure
Type of
superstructure
7.0
High Level
Rehabilitation
Open foundation
7.5
High Level
Repair/Rehabilitation
Open foundation
Open foundation
Remarks
11/270
1 x 6.35
5.0
High Level
Reconstruction
1 x 10.8
Solid Slab
11/660
15/185
15/680
17/900
21/850
29/230
3 x 6.8
2 x 6.8
4 X 6.8
4 x 6.8
3 x 10.8
3 x 42.2
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
High Level
Repair/Rehabilitation
Open foundation
Rehabilitation required
High Level
Repair/Rehabilitation
Open foundation
High Level
Repair/Rehabilitation
Open foundation
High Level
Repair/Rehabilitation
Open foundation
High Level
Repair/Rehabilitation
Open foundation
High Level
Nothing to do
Well foundation
Good, Nothing to do
Reconstruction
1 x 21.6
RCC T-beam
Girder
Pile foundation
5
6
7
8
9
10
29/500
2 x 7.0
5.5
High Level
CEG.Ltd., Jaipur
CEG.Ltd., Jaipur
DESIGN OF SUBSTRUCTURE
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Carriageway
11.00
0.500
PLAN
Clear span=
10.00
420
420
Skew Dimension=
300
11550
300
925
ELEVATION
Basic parameter
Unit weight of RCC
Unit weight of wearing coat
skew angle
skew angle in radian
Thickness of wearing coat
Dead load calculation
Thickness of slab deck center
Thickness of slab at edge
Average Thickness of slab
Dead load of top slab
30/180*3.1416
0.85*24.00
=
=
=
=
=
24.000
22.000
30.000
0.524
0.056
=
=
=
=
925.000
775.000
850.000
20.400
kN/m 3
kN/m 3
degree
radian
M
mm
mm
mm
kN/m 2
600
400
400
775
Parapet kerb
500
Footpath
925
11000
carriageway
12000
500
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Top slab
Total
Dead load of slab at center of bearing of abutment ( stadd out put )
Super Inposed Dead load at center of bearing of abutment ( stadd out put )
Total (Dead+SIDL) load at center of bearing of abutment ( stadd out put )
=
=
=
12.000
11.550
0.225
0.500
1.000
meter
meter
meter
meter
meter
=
=
8.700
0.056
KN/m
meter
2.500
kN/m 2
100.485
kN
=
=
20.400
22.900
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
1530.000 KN
274.330 KN
1804.330 KN
726.530
KN
348.510
KN
Total Reaction
1075.040 KN
Transverse position
Width of Track
width of vehicle
Clearance from kerb
CG of loads from left end A
Transverse eccentricity
Transverse moment
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.840
2.900
1.200
4.382
1.618
1739.526
meter
meter
meter
meter
meter
KN-m
350.930
KN
832.980
KN
Total Reaction due to Class 70R wheel loading and class A loading
1183.910
KN
363.3 kN
0.5
1.2
12.00/2-4.38
1,075.04*1.62
363.265 kN
174.255
1.22
0.84
kN
1.20
0.84
174.255 kN
1.30
0.50
0.5
A
2.120
2.060
1.870
1.80
4.15
12.00
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Transverse position
Width of Wheel
width of vehicle
Clearance in vehicles
Clearance from kerb
CG of loads from left end A
Transverse eccentricity
Transverse moment
416.49 kN
0.5
1.2
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
12.00/2-4.21
1,183.91*1.79
416.49 kN
175.5
1.07
kN
1.20
0.86
0.860
2.790
1.200
1.200
4.205
1.795
meter
meter
meter
meter
meter
2125.026
175.465 kN
1.30
0.86
0.50
0.5
A
2.130
1.930
1.880
4.26
1.80
12.00
0.15
185.333 kN
1.3
0.50
0.900
185.333 kN
1.800
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
185.3333
1.30
1.20
0.50
0.50
1.700
185.3333 kN
1.20
0.50
1.800
1112.000 KN
0.500
1.800
0.150
1.200
5.300
0.700
778.400
185.333333 kN
1.30
0.50
1.700
0.50
1.800
12.000
Summary for different load conditions from superstructure
Load
Dead load
IRC 70R tracked +class A
IRC 70R Wheeled +class A
Three lane of IRC A
P ( KN )
1804
1075.04
1183.91
1112.00
meter
meter
meter
meter
meter
meter
meter
Transvers M ( KN-m )
0.000
1739.53
2125.03
778.40
2.300
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
0.3
0.42
82.335
6.03
1
1.43
0.925
81.410
0.5
2
10
HFL
13.20
80.100
6.316
12
3.69
79.717
Bed
4
11
5
1.2
2.50
31.76
15
7
14
3.698
8
9
76.019
Heel
13
0.15
2.90
0.7
1.2
0.5
0.15
0.72
0.28
1.000
2.3
0.15
Toe
37.80
6.20
68.3
108.837
141.455
-37.3
191.9
-9.35
112.7
188.29
Grade of Concrete for sub Structure "M"
Grade of Reinforcement for sub Structure "Fe"
Unit weight of soil
Unit weight of RCC
Unit weight of PCC
Density of back fill
=
=
=
=
=
=
20.000
415.000
18.000
24.000
22.000
18.000
10.000
178.600
215.580
=
=
=
=
3.698
30.000
0.524
30.000
0.524
N/mm2
N/mm2
kN/m 3
kN/m 3
kN/m 3
kN/m 3
kN/m 3
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
meter
Degree
Radians
Degree
Radians
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cross sectional detail
Deck level
Foundation level
HFL at site
Average bed level
Width of dirt wall
Thickness of slab
Total Height of dirt wall
Width of bearing including Exp joint
Thickness of vertical wall at top
Thickness of vertical wall at base
Projection of PCC
Thickness of PCC
Front projection in foundation slab
Back projection in foundation slab
Thickness of Foundation slab at Junction
Thickness of Abutment cap
Thickness of toe slab at edge
Thickness of heel slab at edge
Total base width of PCC
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
82.335
76.019
80.100
79.717
0.300
0.925
1.425
0.420
0.720
1.000
0.150
0.150
2.300
2.900
1.200
0.500
0.500
0.500
6.500
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
0.279
0.102
m
m
m
m
Earth Pressure
Active earth pressure co-efficient as per coulomb's theory
KA =
COS2( )
COS2 COS( + )
1+
SIN( + ) SIN( )
COS( + )COS( )
Where
=
=
=
=
= 30.000 deg.
= 0.000 deg.
= 20.000 deg.
= 0.000 deg.
=
=
=
=
0.524
0.000
0.349
0.000
Radian
Radian
Radian
Radian
ka =
0.2973
Therefore, Horizontal coefficient of Active earth pressure = KaCos(+)
+)
Kha =
0.2794
Therefore, Vertical coefficient of Active earth pressure = KaSin(+)
+)
Kva =
0.1017
Horizontal coefficient of Active earth pressure =
vertical coefficient of Active earth pressure =
Coeff. of active earth pressure
Coeff. of passive earth pressure Kp =
(1+sin)/(1-sin)
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.279
3.000
0.500
1.200
6.316
7.516
3.698
n
m
m
m
m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Self wt of abutment
wn Particular
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Description
0.30*0.925*24
0.50*0.72*24
3.69*0.72*24
3.69*0.28*24*0.5
2.90*0.70*24*0.5
0.28*0.70*24
2.30*0.70*24*0.5
5.90*0.50*24
6.20*0.15*22
6.17*0.15*18.0
2.90*0.70*18.0*0.5
5.12*2.90*18.0
2.30*2.50*18.0
3.55*0.15*18.0
2.30*0.70*18.0*0.5
Load/m
6.66
8.64
63.78
12.40
24.36
2.35
19.32
5.98
20.46
16.65
18.27
259
0.00
0.00
0.00
Length
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
13.86
Load kN
92.3
119.7
883.8
171.8
337.5
32.6
267.7
82.8
283.5
230.7
253.2
3591.9
0
0
0
Part description
vertical forces
Horizontal
force (kN )
(kN-m)
A
B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
457.381
1203.674
92.3
119.7
883.8
171.8
337.5
32.6
267.7
82.8
283.5
230.7
253.2
3591.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
1804.3
8151.8
1661.055
3.158
2.653
3.300
3.090
3.090
2.637
4.417
2.590
1.683
3.100
3.100
6.425
5.383
4.900
1.300
0.075
0.917
3.000
1444.409
3193.011
304.536
369.933
2730.844
453.095
1490.811
84.409
450.638
256.655
878.856
1482.146
1362.826
17600.46
0.000
0.000
0.000
5412.990
32878.19 4637.41981
0.0
0.0
= 4.03
meter
30
= 0.52
= 0.2794
Degree
Radians
= 6.32
= 0.0
= 31.76
meter
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
0.28*0*18.00
0.28*18.00*6.32
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
0.0
kN/m2
31.76
kN/m2
= 100.31
= 0.42
= 2.653
kN/m
Ht
meter
= 1.2
= 6.035
meter
kN/m 2
2
6.035 kN/m
Total horizontal surcharge pressure
Surcharge pressure act at distance from base
= 38.12
3.16
kN/m
meter
=
=
=
=
meter
meter
1.2 m
Surcharge pressure
6.20
13.86
0.87
0.50
= 1183.91
= 2125.026
70RT
700
20%
5%
140
70RW
920
20%
5%
184
A
384
20%
5%
76.8
2A
768
20%
5%
76.8
3A
1152
20%
5%
96
70RT+A
1084
20%
5%
159.2
70RW+A
1304
20%
5%
203.2
70
1.2
0.93
25.76
92
1.2
0.93
33.85
38.4
1.2
0.93
14.13
38.4
1.2
0.93
14.13
48
1.2
0.93
17.66
79.6
1.2
0.93
29.29
101.6
1.2
0.93
37.39
=
=
=
=
37.39
101.6
87.99
50.80
1
2
3
4
5
6
Particular
Live load
Vertical Reaction due to
Braking force
horizontal Braking force
Braking transverse
Footpath live load
Total
overturnin Resisting
g
moment
moment(k (kN-m)
N)
1183.91
37.39
2.79
2.79
5.39
5.39
2.79
474.3439
87.99
50.80
0.00
1221.3
138.788
273.86
0
0.00
1536.859 3407.414 2114.19
kN
kN
kN
kN
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Load combination
Friction coefficient between concrete & soil ( )
Area of footing
Section modulus of footing area about Transverse axis Zxx
Section modulus of footing area about longitunal axis Zyy
Vert. force
Horiz.
(kN)
force (kN)
Loading
S.no
1
=
=
=
=
Overturning
Moment
(kN.m)
Resisting
Moment
(kN.m)
Trans.
moment
(kN.m)
0.5
85.91
198.40
88.77
m2
m3
m3
9956.2
1661.06
4637.42
32878.2
0.00
Live load
1221.30
87.99
1536.86
3407.41
2114.19
Total
11177.5
1749.04
6174.28
36286
2114.19
4538.8
10.656
51.13
130.107
Calculated
Permissible
191.89
68.32
FS against overturning
5.88
FS against sliding
3.20
1.5
100% 216
= 130.107
= 51.13
= 10.66
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
=
=
=
=
191.89
170.58
89.64
68.32
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
191.89-(191.89-68.32)/2.45
68.32+(191.89-68.32)/3.05
= 141.46
= 108.84
kN/m 2
kN/m 2
at toe
at jn
0.15*24
1.20*24
0.0
0.0
191.89-3.60-0.00
141.46-28.80-0.00
=
=
=
=
=
=
3.60
28.8
0.0
0.0
188.29
112.7
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
at heel
at jn
0.15*24.00
1.20*24.00
5.67*18.00
4.97*18.00
68.32-3.60-101.99
108.84-89.39-28.80
=
=
=
=
=
=
3.60
28.8
102.0
89.4
-37.27
-9.4
kN/m
kN/m2
kN/m2
2
kN/m
kN/m2
2
kN/m
=
=
=
=
P/A+Myy/zyy+Mxx/Zxx
P/A+Myy/zyy-Mxx/Zxx
P/A-Myy/zyy+Mxx/Zxx
P/A-Myy/zyy-Mxx/Zxx
130.11+10.66+51.13
130.11+10.66-51.13
130.11-10.66+51.13
130.11-10.66-51.13
heel
at jn
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Design of toe slab
Design for bending moment
The forces acting acting on the toe slab are
i) downward force due to weight of slab
ii) upward soil pressure on cd
B.M at the junction, c
=
(188.29-112.66)*0.5*2.30^2*2/3+112.66*2.30^2*0.50
Constants
c
t
m
k =1/(1+t/mc)
1/(1+200/(10*6.67))
j=1-k/3
1-0.250/3
Q=1/2ck j
1/2*6.67*0.250*0.917)
Depth required
Total depth provided
Effective Depth provided
(431.35*10^6/(0.76*1000))^0.5
cover 75mm
1,200.0-75.00-10.00
431.35*1,000,000/(200.0*0.92*1,115.0
0.15/100*1,115.00*1,000
Bar1
dia
20
spacing required
149
spacing provided
140
total area provided
2244
percentage of tensile reinf provided
Bar2
0
0
0
0
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
431.3
6.67
200
10
0.25
0.92
0.764
= 751.446
= 1200
1115
> 751.4
Hence ok
= 2110.13
= 0.15
= 1672.5
KN-M
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm2
%
2
mm
= 2244
= 0.20%
mm2
> 2110.1
mm2
Hence ok
Distribution reinforcement
Average depth
Area of distribution reinforcement
= 0.12
= 0.60
= 720
(0.70+0.50)/2
0.12/100*600*1,000
%
m
mm2
Hence ok
Bar1
12
157
150
753.98
dia
spacing required
spacing provided
total area provided
percentage of tensile reinf provided
Bar2
0
0
190
0
There is no Tension below foundation , Hence fondation will not Have Nagative Moment at top ,
However in refrence to clause 707.2.8:of IRC 78-2000, The requrement of reinforcement
at top is folows.
Minimum steel reinforcement as per above Clause
Dia of reinforcement
(3.142/4*144)*1,000)\250.00
Spacing Required
Provide Spacing
Area of reinforcement provided
= 754
= 0.13
=
=
=
=
=
250
12
452.39
150
754
mm2
%
mm2/m
mm
mm
mm2/m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Design for shear force
As per clause 304.7.1 of IRC: 21.2000
Angle between top & bottom face of base slab tan
0.30
= 140.06
194.55
1010.57
= 0.064
= 0.20
kN/m
KN
mm
N/mm2
%
= 1.8
N/mm 2
1.35-(1.35/2.30*1.1)*1000-0.075-0.010
Check for shear stress for which the Reinforcement is not Required
Stress = C
K
C from table 12B of IRC 21-2000
=1
= 0.215
N/mm2
Hence ok
0.5*(-37.27--9.35)*2.9^2*2/3+-9.35*2.90^2*0.5
c
t
m
k =1/(1+t/mc)
1/(1+200/(10*6.67))
j=1-k/3
1-0.250/3
Q=1/2ck j
1/2*6.67*0.250*0.917)
Depth required
Total depth provided
Effective Depth provided
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
(105.37*10^6/(0.76*1000))^0.5
cover 75mm
1,200.0-75.00-10.00
105.37*10^6/(200.0*1*1,115.0)
0.15/100*1,115.00*1,000
Bar1
dia
20
spacing required
188
spacing provided
150
total area provided
2094.4
percentage of tensile reinf provided
Bar2
0
0
0
0
105.4
6.7
200
10
0.250
0.917
0.764
= 371.40
= 1200
1115
> 371.40
Hence ok
= 515.47
= 0.15
= 1672.5
= 2094
= 0.19%
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm2
mm2
mm2
mm
> 515.47
Hence ok
0.241
= -17.372
kN/m2
-9.35+(-37.27--9.35)/2.90*1.12
(-17.37+-37.27)\2*(2.90-1.1)
48.764
KN
1.35-(1.35/2.90*1.1)*1000-0.075-0.010
888.545
= 0.055
mm
N/mm2
= 0.19
= 1.8
N/mm 2
(48.76*1000-1.00*10^6*0.241/888.55)/(888.55*1000)
Check for shear stress for which the Reinforcement is not Required
Stress = C
K
=1
= 0.211
N/mm2
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Design of Abutment wall
6.03
5.116
23.97
active earth
pressure
element
1
2
Ht
Earth pressure
6.03
4.766
23.97
4.766
Horizantal force
1267.6 +
Force
398.53
791.41
138.79
surcharge
L.A
2.383
2.002
4.191
Moment
949.693
1584.184
581.66
3115.54
2988.24
= 4255.86
Kn
Longitudinal Moment
= 3115.54
Kn-m
Transverse Moment
= 2125.03
Kn-m
= 1267.62
Longitudinal moment
= 2533.88
Transverse moment
= 0.00
Reinforcement have been provided as follows and checked with separate programme.
The stresses in concrete and steel are well within permissible limits.
25
200 c/c
16
200 c/c
Horizontal reinforcement
Lateral reinforcement on each face
Thickness at base
Area of reinforcement per meter height
Diameter of bars
Spacing of bars required
0.125
1000
1250
16
161
150
%
mm
mm2
mm
mm
mm
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dirt wall
3.87 KN-m
200.00 kN
40.00 kN
100
0.850
2.120
2.790
0.850
5.760
6.94
6.94
5.90
9.77
25.00
8.33
200.00
10.00
0.294
0.902
1.105
94
300
50
56
244
222
0.15
450
12
251
200
565
m
kN/m
kN/m
KN-m
KN-m
N/mm 2
N/mm 2
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm 2
%
mm 2
mm
mm
mm
mm 2
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Vertical reinforcement : outer face
Minimum vertical reinforcement as above
dia
spacing required
3.14/4*10.00^2*1000/225.00
spacing provided
area provided
3.14/4*10.00^2*1000/200.00
225
10
349
200
393
mm 2/m
mm
mm
mm
mm 2
Horizontal reinforcement :
Min % of steel
Thickness of section
Horizontal reinf. on each face
dia
spacing required3.14/4*10.00^2*1000/360.00
spacing provided
area provided 3.14/4*10.00^2*1000/200.00
0.12%
300
360
10
218
200
393
Approach Slab
Provide approach slab for a length
Total minimum steel
Thickness of approach slab
Area of steel reinf. Per m width
Reinforcement in each layer in each direction
dia
spacing required3.14/4*12.00^2*1000/750.00
spacing provided
area provided 3.14/4*12.00^2*1000/150.00
3.00
1.00%
300
3000
750
12
151
150
754
mm
mm 2
mm 2
mm
mm
mm
mm 2
1.00%
300
3000
750
12
151
150
754
mm
mm 2
mm 2
mm
mm
mm
mm 2
mm
mm 2
mm
mm
mm
mm 2
Abutment cap
The abutment cap is resting on abutment through out, provide minimum reinforcement.
As per clause 716.2.1 of IRC:78-1983
Total minimum steel
Thickness of abutment cap
Area of steel reinf.
Reinforcement in each layer in each direction
dia
spacing required3.14/4*12.00^2*1000/750.00
spacing provided
area provided 3.14/4*12.00^2*1000/150.00
Also provide 8mm dia tor steel @ 100 mm c/c as mesh reinforcement in two layers.
One layer at 20mm and other at 100mm below top of abutment cap shall be provided.
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
DESIGN OF RETURNWALL
a
2.90
3.00
A
82.335
0.75
2.75
5.316
X direction
77.019
A'
Y direction
B'
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.90
3.00
5.316
0.75
2.00
2.75
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Unit wt of Soil
Grade of concrete
=
=
1.8
M
t/m3
20
cbc
m
st
k
j
=
=
680
10
t/m2
=
=
=
20400
0.250
0.917
t/m2
77.9
t/m2
a/b
0.546
0.546
For a/b
0.5
0.631
0.632
For a/b
0.75
1.246
1.186
0.743
0.733
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
bmax
0.2794
1
1.8
1.2
0.603504 t/m
28.26
50.68635 t/m
3
41666667 mm
0.041667 m
=
=
2.111931 t-m/m
2
49.99681 t/m
41666667 mm
0.041667 m
b2
t
amax
q
2
t
bmax
For
1000
Z
0.742986 x
0.603504 x
0.25
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
1000
Z
50.68635 x
0.041667
0.732879 x
0.603504 x
0.25
28.26
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
a/b
2.0832 t-m/m
For a/b
0.5
0.328
0.2
For a/b
0.75
0.537
0.276
0.366057
0.213839
5.316
2
2.673523 t/m
2.673523 x
0.25
28.26
2
110.6274 t/m
3
41666667 mm
3
0.041667 m
0.545523
0.545523
Earth pressure:
q
bmax
0.2794
1
1.8
b2
b2
t2
amax
q
t2
bmax
For
1000
Z
0.366057 x
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
0.213839 x
4.609475 t-m/m
2
64.62502 t/m
41666667 mm
0.041667 m
2.692709 t-m/m
2.673523 x
28.26
0.25
For
1000
Z
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
64.62502 x
0.041667
4.776 t-m/m
Along X-direction
6.721 t-m/m
Along Y-direction
=
+
0.2794 x
1.2
0.5 x
0.2794 x
x
0.75 x
0.5625 x
3.00
2
X x
+
0.5 x
1.8 x 0.444444 x
0.2794 x
+
1.8 x
X
0.2794 x
1.95 x
0.666667 x
=
2.036826 +
0.636508 +
0.11176 x
6.75 +
=
6.37 t-m
Design of cantilever Return:
Assuming
50 mm cover and
12 mm dia bars.
Effective depth available
=
50 20
500
M
Ast
x
1.8
=
=
=
1.8
R
x
b
77.91667 x
6.37
20400
x
x
d2
2.750
3.00
x
Ast/m
Provide
10 mm dia @
200
mm c/c providing
393
Provide
8 mm dia @
200
mm c/c providing
251
1.50
dx x
3.00 x
dx x
3.00
0.653796 x
4.5
X
-
mm
6=
424
0.179776 =
38.52075 t-m
803.3745 mm
2
292.1362 mm /m
10^6
0.916667 x
x
1.50
0.424
mm2 on earth face.
mm2 on other face.
Along Horizantal direction.
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
5.97469 +
22.99
1.867091 +
0.11176 x
32.85
3.00
x
4.40
x
dx
x
x
dx
4.40
5.90
5.90
0.653796 x
17.55
X
-
t-m
4.775909 +
22.98722
5.316
=
=
Ast
20 mm dia bars.
500
50 R
x
b
77.91667 x
9.10
20400
x
x
d2
1.000
20 -
t-m/m
6.72
t-m/m
9.10
t-m/m
13.74
t-m
10^6
0.916667 x
1159
mm
1159
mm2/m
150
mm c/c providing
1340
Provide
10 mm dia @
150
mm c/c providing
524
mm on earth face.
mm2 on other face.
Along Horizantal direction.
=
20 mm dia bars.
50 d2
1.000
=
=
R
x
b
77.91667 x
6.721407 x
20400 x
10^6
0-
0.916667 x
Ast/m
Provide
16 mm dia @
150
mm c/c providing
1340
Provide
10 mm dia @
150
mm c/c providing
524
0.42
500
mm
0.1764 =
16 mm dia @
Assuming
50 mm cover and
Effective depth available
=
420
Provide
Ast
9.10
10 =
Ast/m
10 =
0.1936 =
6.721407 t-m/m
440
mm
15.08
t-m
817
mm2
817
mm2/m
0.44
Design of Substructure
=
=
1.000 m
13.860 m
65
25
7.50
tension face- no of bar:
6
16
7.50
=
=
=
=
10.0
10.0
68.00 Kg/cm^2
2000.00 Kg/cm^2
Axial Load
Mxx
Myy
=
=
=
425.586 T
311.554 Tm
212.503 Tm
28.65 Kg/cm^2
549.59 Kg/cm^2
.34 %
=
=
1.000 m
13.860 m
=
=
=
=
10.0
10.0
68.00 Kg/cm^2
2000.00 Kg/cm^2
Axial Load
Mxx
Myy
=
=
=
126.700 T
253.300 Tm
.010 Tm
22.56 Kg/cm^2
719.01 Kg/cm^2
.34 %
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
L/C
Force-X
kN
1
1
0
152
1
0
153
1
0
154
1
0
155
1
0
156
1
0
157
1
0
Total Dead Load Reaction in KN
Force-Y
kN
402.09
37.92
248.15
237.04
231.32
212.41
157.28
1526.21
Force-Z
kN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Super imposed Dead load Reaction From Super Structure (Stadd Output )
Node
L/C
Force-X
kN
1
2
0
152
2
0
153
2
0
154
2
0
155
2
0
156
2
0
157
2
0
Total Dead Load Reaction in KN
Force-Y
kN
111.1
29.6
19.53
20.38
23.75
28.89
41.08
274.33
Force-Z
kN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Live load Reaction From Super Structure For Class 3A Lane (Stadd Output )
Node
L/C
Force-X
Force-Y
kN
kN
Node
L/C
Force-X
Force-Y
kN
kN
1
34
0
162.91
152
34
0
-1.24
153
34
0
254.41
154
34
0
222.32
155
34
0
186.67
156
34
0
165.09
157
34
0
121.87
Total Reaction with Impact in KN 1112.030
Force-Z
kN
Force-Z
kN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Live load Reaction From Super Structure For Class 70RW withought A lane (Stadd Output
Node
L/C
Force-X
kN
1
98
0
152
98
0
153
98
0
154
98
0
155
98
0
156
98
0
157
98
0
Total Reaction with Impact in KN
Force-Y
kN
102.89
-2.64
331.04
365.44
54.3
-11.61
-6.44
832.98
Force-Z
kN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Live load Reaction From Super Structure For Class A withought 70RW (Stadd Output )
Node
L/C
Force-X
Force-Y
Force-Z
kN
kN
kN
1
174
0
10.6
0
152
174
0
-5.13
0
153
174
0
20.57
0
154
174
0
31.94
0
155
174
0
142.3
0
156
174
0
145.29
0
157
174
0
5.36
0
Total Reaction with Impact in KN
350.93
Live load Reaction From Super Structure For Class 70RT withought A lane (Stadd Output
Node
L/C
Force-X
kN
1
236
0
152
236
0
153
236
0
154
236
0
155
236
0
156
236
0
157
236
0
Total Reaction with Impact in KN
Force-Y
Force-Z
Moment-X Moment-Y Moment-Z
kNm
kNm
kNm
kN
kN
-9.66
0
0
0
0
1.57
0
0
0
0
273.82
0
0
0
0
392.73
0
0
0
0
92.05
0
0
0
0
-23.35
0
0
0
0
-0.63
0
0
0
0
726.53
Live load Reaction From Super Structure For Class A withought 70RT (Stadd Output )
Node
L/C
Force-X
Force-Y
Force-Z
kN
kN
kN
1
314
0
8.94
0
152
314
0
-5.74
0
153
314
0
19.83
0
154
314
0
29.84
0
155
314
0
134.44
0
156
314
0
150.93
0
157
314
0
10.27
0
348.51
Total Reaction with Impact in KN
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
37.
153 178
38.
180 181
39.
184
40.
186 187
41.
189 190
42.
192 193
43.
195 196
44.
198 199
45.
201 202
46.
204 205
47.
207 208
48.
192
49.
215 189
50.
219 220
51.
218
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
348 62.
399 401
63.
64.
417 65.
66.
0.001
67.
373 375
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
330 176 181; 331 175 176; 332 177 182; 333 176 177; 334 178 184; 335
336 179 185; 337 178 179; 338 180 186; 339 179 180; 340 181 187; 341
342 182 188; 343 181 182; 344 183 211; 345 1 183; 346 184 212; 347 183
348 185 213; 349 184 185; 350 186 214; 351 185 186; 352 187 215; 353
354 188 216; 355 187 188; 356 189 162; 357 17 189; 358 190 195; 359
360 191 196; 361 190 191; 362 192 197; 363 191 192; 364 193 198; 365
366 194 199; 367 193 194; 368 195 161; 369 162 195; 370 196 200; 371
372 197 201; 373 196 197; 374 198 202; 375 197 198; 376 199 203; 377
378 200 160; 379 161 200; 380 201 204; 381 200 201; 382 202 205; 383
384 203 206; 385 202 203; 386 204 159; 387 160 204; 388 205 207; 389
390 206 208; 391 205 206; 392 207 158; 393 159 207; 394 208 209; 395
396 209 8; 397 158 209; 398 210 194; 399 211 193; 400 210 211; 401 212
402 211 212; 403 213 191; 404 212 213; 405 214 190; 406 213 214; 407
408 214 215; 409 216 17; 410 215 216; 411 217 218; 412 218 219; 413
414 220 221; 415 221 222; 416 222 223; 417 17 223; 418 8 217; 419 158
420 159 219; 421 160 220; 422 161 221; 423 162 222
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC MATERIAL1
E 2.5E+007
POISSON 0.15
DENSITY 24
DAMP 7.90066E+033
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
299 TO 303 309 TO 313 316 320 322 326 328 330 334 336 338 340 344 346
350 352 356 358 360 362 364 368 370 372 374 378 380 382 386 388 392
403 405 407 419 TO 423 PRIS YD 0.85 ZD 1
1 255 285 287 314 318 324 332 342 354 366 376 384 390 394 396 398 409
418 PRIS YD 0.85 ZD 0.5
257 286 288 TO 298 304 TO 308 411 TO 416 PRIS AX 0.001 IX 0.001 IZ
315 317 319 321 323 325 327 329
377 379 381 383 385 387 389 391
400 402 404 406 408 410 PRIS YD
345 347 349 351 353 355 357 359
SUPPORTS
1 152 TO 157 PINNED
8 17 158 TO 162 FIXED BUT FX FZ
MX MY MZ
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
417 93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL MATERIAL1 MEMB 1 255 257 285 TO 423
MEMBER RELEASE
417 TO 422 START FY MZ
255 287 309 TO 313 END MZ
DEFINE MOVING LOAD
TYPE 1 LOAD 13.5 13.5 57 57 34 34 34 34
DIST 1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3 WID 1.8
TYPE 2 LOAD 40 60 60 85 85 85 85
DIST 3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37 WID 1.93
TYPE 3 LOAD 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
DIST 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 0.457 WID 2.06
LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD(SLAB LOAD)
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 0 0 FLOAD -20.4 XRANGE -6.92822 13.55 ZRANGE 0 12
LOAD 2 DEAD LOAD(SIDL)
************CRASH BARIEAR LOAD
MEMBER LOAD
1 255 285 287 314 318 324 332 342 354 366 376 384 390 394 396 398 409
418 UNI GY -10
****************WEARING COAT*2
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 0 0 FLOAD -2 XRANGE -6.92822 13.55 ZRANGE 0 13.86
LOAD 3 LIVE LOAD
**************THREE LANE OF CLASS A
LOAD GENERATION 75
TYPE 1 -26 0 2.7 XINC 0.5
TYPE 1 -26 0 6.2 XINC 0.5
TYPE 1 -26 0 9.7 XINC 0.5
*******************70R WHEELED WITHOUGHT CLASS A
LOAD GENERATION 65
TYPE 2 -20 0 4.06 XINC 0.5
*****************ONE LANE OF CLASS A WITHOUGHT 70R WHEELED
LOAD GENERATION 75
TYPE 1 -26 0 7.74 XINC 0.5
********************70R TRACKED TRAIN WITHOUGHT CLASS A
LOAD GENERATION 65
TYPE 3 -15 0 4.18 XINC 0.5
*****************ONE LANE OF CLASS A WITHOUGHT 70R TRACK
LOAD GENERATION 75
TYPE 1 -26 0 7.85 XINC 0.5
PERFORM ANALYSIS
LOAD LIST 1
PRINT SUPPORT REACTION LIST 1 152 TO 157
SUPPORT REACTION LIST
1
1
152
153
154
METE
LOAD
FORCE-X
FORCE-Y
FORCE-Z
MOM-X
MOM-Y
MOM Z
1
1
1
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
402.09
37.92
248.15
237.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
155
156
157
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM Z
1
152
153
154
155
156
157
1
0.00
231.32
0.00
0.00
1
0.00
212.41
0.00
0.00
1
0.00
157.28
0.00
0.00
*PRINT SUPPORT REACTION LIST 8 17 158 TO 162
*********************THREE LANE OF CLASS A
*LOAD LIST 2 TO 77
LOAD LIST 34
PRINT SUPPORT REACTION LIST 1 152 TO 157
SUPPORT REACTION LIST
1
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
148.94
-2.94
177.76
171.23
127.75
103.22
63.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM Z
123.
124.
125.
126.
1
152
153
154
155
156
157
127.
128.
129.
130.
JOINT
1
152
153
154
155
156
157
131.
132.
133.
134.
98
0.00
91.72
98
0.00
-2.47
98
0.00
290.68
98
0.00
320.30
98
0.00
39.47
98
0.00
-7.77
98
0.00
-5.51
******************ONE LANE OF
*LOAD LIST 143 TO 217
LOAD LIST 174
PRINT SUPPORT REACTION LIST 1
SUPPORT REACTION LIST
1
LOAD
174
174
174
174
174
174
174
FORCE-X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FORCE-Y
9.83
-3.54
20.52
34.18
97.00
82.24
3.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CLASS A WITHOUGHT 70R WHEELED
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
152 TO 157
FORCE-Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM-X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM-Y
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Design of Substructure
Slab Bridge Span 10.8 (SQ)
SUPPORT
JOINT
1
152
153
154
155
156
157
135.
136.
137.
138.
JOINT
1
152
153
154
155
156
157
LOAD
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
REACTION LIST
FORCE-X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FORCE-Y
-8.64
1.49
246.27
347.84
91.82
-22.94
-0.70
FORCE-Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM-X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM-Y
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
139. FINISH
FORCE-X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FORCE-Y
8.87
-3.84
19.96
32.51
92.98
85.61
5.74
FORCE-Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM-X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM-Y
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MOM Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CEG.Ltd., Jaipur
DESIGN OF SUPERSTRUCTURE
For Design of Superstructure of solid slab 10.0 m with a skew of 300 refer
MOST STANDARD Drawing titled STANDARD DRAWING FOR
ROAD BRIDGES (R.C.C Solid slab superstructure (150 and 300 Skew)
span 4.0 m to 10.0 m 9With and without footpath) Drg. No. SD/172.
CEG.Ltd., Jaipur
CEG.Ltd., Jaipur
DESIGN OF SUBSTRUCTURE
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Design Data :
For design purposes, following parameters have been considered.
Grade of concrete
Abutment
Pile cap & Pile
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
M - 30
M - 35
Fe - 415
21.600 m
21.000 m
2100 mm
56.00 mm
98.300 m
0.350 m
90.145 m
94.609 m
92.569
95.794 m
89.145 m
1800 mm
87.345 m
1200 mm
0.000 m
0.000 m
13.500 m
207 Tons
= II
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
450
12.00
11.00
0.200
0.15
0.3375
5
6
haunch
0.3 x 0.15
1.8625
1.43
0.325
2.166
0.15 x 0.15
haunch
0.25
0.625
2.025
I cross sectional area at mid span
2.65
2.65
2.65
0.3 x 0.15 x
0.27
m2
0.18
m2
1 top haunch
3 bottom rect
0.25 x
0.625 x
2
0.625 m
2
1.8571 m
4 web
0.325 x
1.4285 x
5 slab
0.2688 x
12.00 x
1.8625 x
0.15
3.23
m2
2
0.2794 m
6.44
m2
2.99
m3
2.325 x
0.3 x
2.025
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
12.00
11.00
3
0.200
0.15
0.3375
haunch
0.15 x
1.8625
1.43
0.075
2.166
0.15 x 0.15
haunch
0.625
0.4
0.625
2.025
2.65
2.65
2.65
0.15
0.075 x
2
0.0675 m
2 web
0.625 x
1.4285 x
2
3.5713 m
0.2688 x
12.00 x
1.8625 x
0.15
3.23
m2
2
0.2794 m
7.14
m2
2.025 x
3x
0.3 x
3
5.2069 m
2.025
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
12.497 t
17.144 t/m
16.295 t/m
0.7
12.497 t
7.1739 t
15.447 t/m
0.9
18.38
21
21.58
RA
RB
RA
184.71 t
S.I.D.L
1 Wearing Coat
@ 1.3552 t/m
2 Crash barrier
@ 1.000 t/m
(provide one side enter 1,bothsides enter 2 , otherwise enter 0)
RA
Total DL + SIDL reaction
=
=
36.236 t
220.95 t
=
2
1.3552 t/m
2.00
3.36
t/m
t/m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
12
2.025
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.025
0.350
0.5
95.794
95.294
abutment shaft top level
12.000
94.61
GL
H.F.L
90.145
1.00
89.145
12.3
1.8
50
mm
87.345
0.75
13.5
1.2
3.6
3.6
3.6
73.845
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Loads from substructure
1.200
12.00
1
DRY Condition
0
1 Wt of abutment cap
Rectangular
12.00
0.50
1.20 x
2.4
Dirtwall
12.00 x
a Approach slab 12.00 x
2.206
0.3
x
x
0.30 x
1.75 x
2.4
2.4
=
=
=
19.0598 t
15.12 t
34.1798 t
1.2
0
x
x
6.15 x
6.15 x
2.4
2.4
=
=
=
212.509 t
0
t
212.509 t
1.8
462.283 t
2 Wt of Abutment Shaft
12
x
0.7854 x
17.28
3 Wt of Pile cap
12.3
8.7
8.7 -
12
0.5
1.20 x
2.4
12
12
x
x
2.206
0.3
x
x
0.30 x
1.75 x
2.4
2.4
=
=
=
19.0598 t
15.12 t
34.1798 t
2 Wt of Abutment Shaft
12
12
0.7854
0.7854
x
x
x
x
1.2
1.2
0
0
x
x
x
x
0.69
5.46
0.69
5.46
2.4
1.4
2.4
1.4
=
=
=
=
=
23.6736
110.154
0
0
133.828
8.7
269.665 t
8.7 -
12
2.4
1.2 x
1.8 x
166.698 t
H.F.L Condition
Rectangular
Dirtwall
a Approach slab
x
x
x
x
17.28
t
t
t
t
t
3 Wt of Pile cap
12.3
5 Weight due to Earth
12.3
1.8
12
x
1.2 x
1.4
1
92.61
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
2.206
0.3
0.3
0.6
1.2
8.7
0.75
0.15
3.6
3.6
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
3.75
98.3
0.75
2.67
9.155
H.F.L
94.61
5.46
89.145
Height of returnwall
9.16
width of returnwall
0.45
46.08
=
=
=
12.91
23.95
36.86
t
t
t
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,JAIPUR
_______________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Longitudinal Force :
21.60
For span of
m.
Longitudinal translation due to creep, shrinkage & temperature = 0.0005
Horizontal movement
= 0.0005 x 21.60 x 1000
= 5.400 mm
2
Size of bearing = 500 x 250 x 50 mm
Strain in bearing = 5.400 = 0.108
50
Shear modulus = 1.0 Mpa
Shear force per Bearing
= 0.108 x 1.0 x 500 x 250 = 13500 N
=
Total shear force for
4 bearings ( with 5 % increase )
= 1.376 x 4 x 1.05 = 5.780 t
Refer IRC : 6 clause 214.5.1.5;
10 % increase for variation in movement of span
1.1 x 5.780 = 6.358 t
Total shear force
=
As per clause 214.2 of IRC:6, horizontal braking force Fh, for each span is:
For Class A Single lane
: Fh = 0.2 x 55.4
= 11.080 t
For class 70R wheeled
: Fh =
0.2 x 100
Fh = 0.2 x 55.4 +
For class A 3 lane
For class 70R wheeled +class A 1 lane
Fh = 0.2 x 100 +
For class A 3 lane
Longitudinal horizontal force =
13.850 + 6.358
2
For class 70R wheeled +class A 1 lane
Longitudinal horizontal force =
22.770 + 6.358
2
Summary of Longitudinal Forces :
Longitudinal
Load Case
horizontal force (t)
Class A 3 lane
14.00
70R+class A 1lane
18.00
0.00
spandislodged
= 20.000 t
0.05 x 55.4 =
13.85 t
0.05 x 55.4 =
22.77 t
17.7
t Say, 18.0 t
1.376 t
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,JAIPUR
_______________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
70R+class A 1lane
Class A 3 lane
112.38
107.19
0.7
= 1.721
Longitudinal moment Transverse moment
0.00
0.00
193.39
75.03
Vertical
Horizontal force Longitudinal moment Transverse moment
load
184.71
36.24
107.19
112.38
0.00
14.00
18.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
75.03
193.39
0.00
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
+ 184.71 = 220.95 t
= 112.38 t
333.33 t Say, 334.00 t
+ 184.71 = 220.95 t
= 112.38 t
333.33 t Say, 334.00 t
= 193.39 t-m
Say, 194.00 t-m
= 159.00 t-m
Say, 159.00 t-m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
0.00
=
=
0.00
0.00
0.00
t
t
t Say,
0.00
0.00
0.00
= 0.000 Say,
Say,
0.0
t-m
t-m
0.00
=
=
0.00
0.00
0.00
t
t
t Say,
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Summary :
P (t)
184.71
1 DL
H (t)
0.00
36.24
2 SIDL
3 LL
70RW +Class A 112.38
4 Span dislodged
0.00
Substructure weight
DRY
1 Abutment cap +
Dirtwall
2 Abutment shaft
212.51 t
3 Pile cap
462.28 t
ML (t-m)
0.00
MT (t-m)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.00
159.00
193.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
51.46 t
726.25 t
H.F.L
1 Abutment cap
51.46 t
2 Abutment shaft
133.83 t
3 Pile cap
269.67 t
92.61 t
454.9529 t
Earthpressure
1 Dry condition
442.33 t
2076.89 t-m
2 H.F.L
347.31 t
1511.64 t-m
H.F.L
Returnwall
760.094
46.078
806.172
558.472
36.857
595.330
t
t
t
t
t
t
1881.23
114.04
- 1995.27
1382.22
91.22
- 1473.44
t-m
t-m
t-m
t-m
t-m
t-m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Load Case
Total Load
P
I DRY Condition
1 With L.L
2 Span dislodged
1865.75
1532.42
240.62
81.62
193.39
0.00
II H.F.L Condition
1 With LL
2 Span dislodged
1383.61
1050.28
197.20
38.20
193.39
0.00
No of Piles
12
0.75
4
12
5
3.6
11
6
3.75
0.6
3.6
10
3.6
1
9
8
0.75
0.75
3.6
3.6
0.75
8.7
Pile No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
x
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
0
0
0
0
103.68
ZL
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
0
0
0
0
y
5.4
1.8
1.8
5.4
5.4
1.8
1.8
5.4
5.4
1.8
1.8
5.4
194.4
ZT
36
108
108
36
36
108
108
36
36
108
108
36
12.3
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Case I
1
1
DRY
with L.L
Pmax,min = 1865.75
12
P
2
max,min = 1865.75
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
3
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
4
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
5
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
6
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
7
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
8
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
9
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
10
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
11
12
Pmax,min = 1865.75
12
12
2
spandislodged DRY
Pmax,min = 1532.42
1
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
2
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
3
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
4
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
5
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
6
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
7
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
8
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
9
12
Pmax,min = 1532.42
10
12
P
11
max,min = 1532.42
12
P
12
max,min = 1532.42
12
- 240.62
28.80
- 240.62
28.80
- 240.62
28.80
- 240.62
28.80
+ 240.62
28.80
+ 240.62
28.80
+ 240.62
28.80
+ 240.62
28.80
+ 240.62
0.00
+ 240.62
0.00
+ 240.62
0.00
+ 240.62
0.00
+ 193.39
36.00
+ 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
36.00
- 193.39
36.00
- 193.39
108.00
+ 193.39
108.00
+ 193.39
36.00
+ 193.39
36.00
+ 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
36.00
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
28.80
81.62
0.00
81.62
0.00
81.62
0.00
81.62
0.00
+
+
+
+
+
-
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
= 152.50 t
= 148.92 t
= 145.33 t
= 141.75 t
= 158.46 t
= 162.04 t
= 165.62 t
= 169.21 t
= 160.85 t
= 157.27 t
= 153.69 t
= 150.11 t
= 124.87 t
= 124.87 t
= 124.87 t
= 124.87 t
= 130.54 t
= 130.54 t
= 130.54 t
= 130.54 t
= 127.70 t
= 127.70 t
= 127.70 t
= 127.70 t
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
H.F.L
II
1 1
with L.L
Pmax,min = 1383.61
12
P
2
max,min = 1383.61
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
3
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
4
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
5
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
6
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
7
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
8
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
9
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
10
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
11
12
Pmax,min = 1383.61
12
12
2
spandislodged condition
Pmax,min = 1050.28
1
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
2
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
3
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
4
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
5
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
6
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
7
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
8
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
9
12
Pmax,min = 1050.28
10
12
P
11
max,min = 1050.28
12
P
12
max,min = 1050.28
12
- 197.20
28.80
- 197.20
28.80
- 197.20
28.80
- 197.20
28.80
+ 197.20
28.80
+ 197.20
28.80
+ 197.20
28.80
+ 197.20
28.80
+ 197.20
0.00
+ 197.20
0.00
+ 197.20
0.00
+ 197.20
0.00
H.F.L
- 38.20
28.80
- 38.20
28.80
- 38.20
28.80
- 38.20
28.80
+ 38.20
28.80
+ 38.20
28.80
+ 38.20
28.80
+ 38.20
28.80
+ 38.20
0.00
+ 38.20
0.00
+ 38.20
0.00
+ 38.20
0.00
+ 193.39
36.00
+ 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
36.00
- 193.39
36.00
- 193.39
108.00
+ 193.39
108.00
+ 193.39
36.00
+ 193.39
36.00
+ 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
108.00
- 193.39
36.00
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
= 113.83 t
= 110.24 t
= 106.66 t
= 103.08 t
= 116.78 t
= 120.36 t
= 123.94 t
= 127.52 t
= 120.67 t
= 117.09 t
= 113.51 t
= 109.93 t
= 86.20 t
= 86.20 t
= 86.20 t
= 86.20 t
= 88.85 t
= 88.85 t
= 88.85 t
= 88.85 t
= 87.52 t
= 87.52 t
= 87.52 t
= 87.52 t
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
DRY
H.F.L
Pmax
169.21
Pmin
124.87
Pmax
127.52
Pmin
86.20
18.00 + 442.33
0.00
=
460.33 t
= 38.36104 t per pile
=
442.33 t
= 36.86104 t per pile
18.00 + 347.31
0.00
+ 442.33
=
365.31 t
= 30.44263 t per pile
=
347.31 t
= 28.94263 t per pile
+ 347.31
E x I
5
R =
K1
E x I
E = Youngs modulus
kg/m2
K1 = Constant
kg/cm3
K2
kg/cm2
4
I = moment of inertia of pile cross section cm
K2
Dia of pile
1.20
E =
5000 x
I = 3.14 x
64
K1
610.73
120
35
2
= 301533 kg/cm
4
= 10178760 cm
0.775
K2
T
R
= 330.78
=
0
= 87.35
= 87.35
L1
73.845
87.35
=
=
=
T
Lf
2.19
T
Lf
724.42 cm
1350 cm
cm
0
0
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
= 38.361 x 724.42
12 x 301533 x 10178760
=
=
Maximum Moment
MF = Q x
M
L1 + Lf
2
M
= m x
F
= 0.83 x 138.95
0.396
cm
3.96 mm
= 138.95 t-m
= 115.33 t-m
Reinforcement in pile:
Provide
Provide
25 mm
dia
28 nos
mm Rings at
2
137.44 cm
180 mm c/c
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
NORMAL CASE
MAX. LOAD MIN. LOAD
1.200
1.200
0.075
0.075
10.000
10.000
98.97
107.93
137.445
137.445
169.21
86.20
115.33
115.33
0.600
0.525
0.004
1.727
-0.156
1.750
0.600
0.525
0.004
1.884
-0.308
1.930
0.964
0.586
-0.308
-0.178
-0.351
0.984
0.145
0.512
0.001
30.20
0.110
0.853
0.223
0.005
-6.33
0.162
0.861
0.950
-0.586
-0.352
-0.659
0.936
0.099
0.624
0.001
30.53
0.106
1.040
0.139
0.006
-11.56
0.080
0.682
0.682
1.320
1.338
-0.094
0.506
1.125
1048
12793
1190
20400
-0.185
0.415
1.125
1075
18376
1190
20400
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
PILE 2
PILE 3
PILE 4
PL1 + PL2+PL3+PL4
152.50
148.92
145.33
141.75
PILE 5
PILE 6
PILE 7
PILE 8
588.50
PL5+PL6+PL7+PL8
655.34
158.46
162.04
165.62
169.21
Therefore,
Critical load for bending in transverse direction = 655.34 t
L.W.L
spandislodged
Load on individual Pile
PILE 1
PILE 2
PILE 3
PILE 4
PL1 + PL2+PL3+PL4
124.87
124.87
124.87
124.87
PILE 5
PILE 6
PILE 7
PILE 8
499.47
PL5+PL6+PL7+PL8
522.14
130.54
130.54
130.54
130.54
Therefore,
Critical load for bending in transverse direction = 522.14 t
II
H.F.L
with L.L
Load on individual Pile
PILE 1
PILE 2
PILE 3
PILE 4
PL1 + PL2+PL3+PL4
113.83
110.24
106.66
103.08
PILE 5
PILE 6
PILE 7
PILE 8
433.81
PL5+PL6+PL7+PL8
488.59
116.78
120.36
123.94
127.52
Therefore,
Critical load for bending in transverse direction = 488.59 t
H.F.L
spandislodged condition
Load on individual Pile
PILE 1
PILE 2
PILE 3
PILE 4
PL1 + PL2+PL3+PL4
86.20
86.20
86.20
86.20
PILE 5
PILE 6
PILE 7
PILE 8
344.79
PL5+PL6+PL7+PL8
355.40
88.85
88.85
88.85
88.85
Therefore,
Critical load for bending in transverse direction = 355.40 t
Design of Pile cap in Longitudinal direction :
0.60
SECTION M-M
SECTION S-S
8.7
1.6375
2.1125
1800
2.2375
1.963
0.75
0.75
C Pier
3.6
C Pile
3.6
C Pile
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
&
Fe - 415
scbc =
11.67
m=
10
sst =
200
K=
N/mm2
N/mm2
0.368
j=
0.877
R=
1.886
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
m
m
m
m
m
t
t-m
t
m
0.87 x fy
=
s
Provide
0.4
0.4 x b
2
= 13.627 mm /m
0.87 x fy
2 Legged
10 @ 175
= 27.489
1800 x
1000
mm2/m width
2
2
2416.6 mm > 2160.0 mm
2
2
1546.6 mm > 1080.0 mm
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
597.30
H.F.L With L.L
1 Vertical load S.I.D.L.
Dead load
Live load
Abutment cap
Abutment shaft
Total load
2 Longitudinal moment Due to earth
Due to Longitudinal force
Total moment
3 Transverse moment Due to Live load
Total moment
=
=
=
=
=
=
36.24
184.71
112.38
51.46
133.828
518.62
1382.00
194.00
t
t
t
t
t
t Say, 518.62 t
= 966.507 t-m
= 125.98 t-m
= 1092.49 t-m
= 193.39 t-m
= 193.39 t-m
518.62
1093.00
DRY spandislodgedcondition
1 Vertical load S.I.D.L.
= 0.00 t
Dead load
= 0.00 t
Abutment cap
= 51.46 t
Abutment shaft
= 212.51 t
Total load = 263.97 t Say, 263.97 t
2 Longitudinal moment Due to Longitudinal force = 0.000
Due to earth
6.999
=
t-m
0
= 1256.00 t-m
= 1256.00 t-m
194.00
1257.00 t-m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
t-m
0.00
Say,
0.00
t-m
263.97
1257.00
0.00
t
t
t
t
t Say, 185.29 t
x
6.999
=
0
t-m
= 966.51 t-m
= 966.51 t-m
967.00 t-m
185.29
0.00
967.00
60
120
two layers
1200
16
25
16
8 no.
both sides
12000
P
597.30
263.97
ML
1382.00
1257.00
MT
194.00
0.00
518.62
185.29
1093.00
967.00
194.00
0.00
Igxx
=
12000 mm
=
1200
mm
2
mm
= 14400000
4
= 1.73E+12 mm
Igyy
4
= 1.73E+14 mm
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
y
12000
Abutment section
Transformed sectional properties of section:
Adopting
Modular ratio
m
= 10
Cover
72.5
Dia of Bars
= 25
No of bars in tension face (longer) = 120
No of bars in compression face
=
No of bars in shorter direction
Total bars in section
As
Steel Area
% of Steel
1200
68
16
60
8
=
196
=
2
= 74186 mm
= 0.5152 %
y
525
5932
y
Asx
58905
mm2
Asy
= 1608.5
mm2
= 14325814
= 527.5
= 5932
= 15067670
2
1 As ax
mm2
Ac = Ag - As
Area of concrete
C.G of Steel placed on longer face
C.G of Steel placed on shorter face
Transformed Area of Section Atfm
Transformed M.Itxx = Igxx
Zxx
4
= 2.02303E+12 mm
mm3
= 3.37E+09
= M.Itxx
d/2
+ 2 m -
mm
mm
mm2
+ 2 m -
1 As ay
4
= 1.73819E+14 mm
mm3
= 2.9E+10
= M.Ityy
d/2
Permissible stresses
Minimum Gross Moment of inertia Imin
Area of section
r
4
= 1.73E+12 mm
2
= 14400000 mm
= 346.4102 mm
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
L
Leff
= 6.149 m
= 10.761 m
= 31.064
=
< 50
Shotr Column
=
1
Permissible stresses : concrete
2
cbc
=
10 N/mm
2
co
=
7.5 N/mm
Tensile stress
Permissible stresses : Steel
st
S.No
1
Item
Loads and Moments
P
0.67
N/mm2
200
N/mm2
DRY Case
L.L
597.30
t
Span dislodg
263.97 t
1257.00 t-m
ML
1382.00
t-m
MT
-194.00
t-m
0.00
t-m
Actual(calculated) Stresses
4
5
6
7
co,cal
cbc,cal
cbc,cal
cbc,cal
P/Atfm
ML/Zxx
MT/Zyy
0.396409711
4.09879899
-0.06696628
4.031832706
= 5+ 6
Permissible Stresses
cbc
8
co
9
0.175189
3.728068
0
3.728068
10
7.5
10
7.5
796396.1
6371.169
43200
351959
2815.7
43200
43200
74185.57
43200
74186
0.456038
0.3962
+ cbc,cal
cbc
mm2
mm2
< 1 O.K
< 1 O.K
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
S.No
1
Item
Loads and Moments
P
-3.553
-0.67
Cracked
DRY Case
L.L
518.62
t
Span dislodg
185.29 t
967.00 t-m
ML
1093.00
t-m
MT
-194.00
t-m
0.00
t-m
Actual(calculated) Stresses
co,cal
P/Atfm
4
cbc,cal
ML/Zxx
5
MT/Zyy
6
cbc,cal
cbc,cal = 5 + 6
7
Permissible Stresses
cbc
8
co
9
0.344190888
3.241669534
-0.06696628
3.17470325
0.12297
2.867973
0
2.867973
10
7.5
10
7.5
691487.3
5531.898
43200
247050
1976.4
43200
43200
74185.57
43200
74186
0.363362
0.3032
mm2
mm2
+ cbc,cal
cbc
< 1 O.K
< 1 O.K
-2.745
-0.67
Cracked
Note:
The design for cracked section has been carried out as per computer programme ,
which is based on "Behaviour of columns and walls"in the book entitled "Reinforced Concrete
Structural Elements" by P.Purushothaman.
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
=
=
=
=
98.3
87.345
90.145
94.609
m
m
m
m
sin ( + )
Ka =
sin( + ). sin( i)
sin . sin( ) 1 +
sin( ). sin( + i)
Here
sin
sin
sub
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.87
1.22
x
x
30 o
20 o
0o
90 o
1.8 t/m3
3
1.0 t/m
12 m
sin
sin
0.52
1.57
0.2973
0.2973
x
0.2973
x
0.5
x
362.12 t
362.12
x
1666 t-m
1.8
1.0
5.863
say
0.42
x
x
x
363
x
10.96
0.00
10.96
=
=
x
98.300
12
5.86 t/m2
0 t/m2
x
cos 0.3
10.96
10.96
87.345
P1
P2
0.2973
0.2973
F4 =
0.5
=
41.107
F5 =
0.5
=
88.45
F6 =
1.98
=
161.80
Total force, F =
=
M =
41.107
+
88.45
=
1162
1.98 t/m2
2.16 t/m2
x
x
1.8
1.0
x
x
3.69
7.26
=
=
1.975
3.69
12
cos 0.3
2.16
7.26
12
cos 0.3
7.26
12
cos 0.3
3.69
t
F4
94.609
7.26
7.26
t
t
41.107 +
291
t
x
( 0.42
x
0.33
t-m
88.45
x
x
+
3.69
7.26
161.80
+
+
F6
7.26 )
161.8 x
F5
P5
7.26
2
87.345
P4
H.F.L
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
98.300
F7
10.96
0.64 t/m2
cos 0.3
87.345
P6
H.F.L
P6 =
F7 =
=
0.2973 x
0.6422 x
0.3568 x
1.2
3.69
7.26 x
M =
26.729 x
9.11 +
x
x
1.0
12
12
=
x
0.36 t/m2
cos 0.3
x cos 0.3
29.22
3.6
=
=
=
26.72901 t
29.22417 t
55.95318
349.63008 tm
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION
Formation level
Pilecap top level
Low Water Level
Highest flood level
=
=
=
=
98.3
89.145
90.145
94.609
m
m
m
m
sin ( + )
Ka =
sin( + ). sin( i)
sin . sin( ) 1 +
sin( ). sin( + i)
Here
sub
sin
sin
0.87
1.22
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
x
x
30 o
20 o
0o
90 o
3
1.8 t/m
3
1.0 t/m
12 m
sin
sin
0.52
1.57
0.2973
0.2973
x
0.2973
x
0.5
x
252.9 t
252.9
x
972 t-m
1.8
1.0
4.899
say
0.42
x
9.16
x
0.00
x
9.16
253 t
x
9.16
=
=
x
98.300
2
12
4.9 t/m
2
0 t/m
x
cos 0.3
9.16
89.145
P1
P2
0.2973
0.2973
F4 =
0.5
=
41.107
F5 =
0.5
=
50.05
F6 =
1.98
=
121.71
Total force, F =
=
M =
41.107
+
50.05
=
711
2
1.98 t/m
2
1.62 t/m
x
x
1.8
1.0
x
x
3.69
5.46
=
=
1.975
3.69
12
cos 0.3
1.625
5.46
12
cos 0.3
5.46
12
cos 0.3
3.69
t
t
94.609
5.46
5.46
t
41.107 +
213
t
x
(
0.42
x
0.33
t-m
50.05
121.71
89.145
x
x
3.69
5.46
+
+
5.46 )
121.7
x
P5
5.46
2
P4
H.F.L
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
98.300
0.2973 x
0.6422 x
0.3568 x
1.2
3.69
5.46 x
M =
26.729 x
7.31 +
x
x
9.16
2
0.64 t/m
cos 0.3
89.145
P6
1.0
12
12
=
x
0.36 t/m
cos 0.3
x cos 0.3
21.98
2.7
=
=
=
26.72901 t
21.9825 t
48.7115
255.43187 tm
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
2010.62 mm2
Transverse steel:
0.018
Quantity of steel to be provided in Longitudinal direction
=
50
Assuming a clear cover of
=
16
Assuming a dia of bar
=
1.20 0.100
1.1
Length of bar
=
Volume of each stirrup
Provide
16
mm dia bar
0.00022 m3
7
nos
1000
7
142.857 mm
=
mm c/c stirrups throught in length of abutment cap.
1436.16 mm2
=
=
140
m3
mm
mm
m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Design of Dirt wall:
Dirt wall designed as a vertical cantilever.
2.21
F1
F2
0.2794
2.00
1.2
0.67056 t/m
F1
Intensity for triangular portion
=
=
0.67056 x
0.2794 x
12.00
2.00
x
x
2.21
2.21
=
=
17.75106 t
2
1.232713 t/m
12.00
x
1.10
0.92652
2.21
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
16.31619
19.57942
15.11727
34.6967
2.891391
0.3
50
=
=
12
244
1.232713
F2
=
17.75106
M1
=
16.31619
M2
=
M1+ M2
Total moment at base of dirt wall /m length
Thickness of dirtwall
Assuming a clear cover on either face
Vertical steel on earth face:
dia of steel bar
300
Available effective depth
=
effective depth req
Minimum steel
Provide
=
12
mm dia bar
50
2.891391
1.51
x
Ast req
x
x
x
2.891391
200
x
0.12
100
200
t
t-m
t-m
t-m
t-m/m
m
mm
mm
mm
138.3773 mm
2
666.4772 mm /m
1000
0.889
244
300
1000
360
mm2/m
Minimum steel
=
=
300
0.867417
200
x
50
12
0.3
2.891391
0.889
238
200
=
=
=
=
12
238
mm
mm
0.867417 t-m/m
2
204.9837 mm /m
250
mm2/m
250
mm2/m
250
mm2/m
2
392.6991 mm /m
Distribution steel:
As per IRC:21-200 cl:305.10
All faces provide minimum steel of
Provide
10
mm dia bar
200
mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face.
250
mm2/m
2
392.6991 mm /m
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
DESIGN OF RETURNWALL
a
3.75
4.00
A
98.300
0.75
3.42
9.155
X direction
89.145
A
'
Y direction
'
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
3.75
4.00
9.155
0.75
2.67
3.42
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Unit wt of Soil
Grade of concrete
=
=
1.8
M
t/m3
30
cbc
m
st
k
j
=
=
1020
10
t/m2
=
=
=
20400
0.333
0.889
t/m2
151.1
t/m2
a/b
0.4096122
0.4096122
For a/b
0.375
1
1
For a/b
0.5
0.429978
0.462794
=
=
0.353
0.398
0.631
0.632
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
bmax
0.2794
1
1.8
1.2
0.603504 t/m
83.81
86.99668 t/m
3
41666667 mm
0.041667 m
=
=
3.624862 t-m/m
2
93.63639 t/m
41666667 mm
0.041667 m
3.901516 t-m/m
b2
t
amax
q
2
t
bmax
For
1000
Z
0.4299776 x
0.603504 x
0.25
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
For
Z
86.99668 x
0.041667
0.4627941 x
0.603504 x
0.25
83.81
mm of width
1000
250000
x
6
a/b
For a/b
0.375
0.212
0.148
For a/b
0.5
0.328
0.200
0.24412
0.162399
9.155
2
4.604233 t/m
4.604233 x
0.25
83.81
2
376.8232 t/m
3
41666667 mm
3
0.041667 m
0.4096122
0.4096122
Earth pressure:
q
bmax
0.2794
1
1.8
x
q
b2
b2
t2
amax
q
t2
bmax
For
1000
Z
0.2441202 x
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
0.1623987 x
15.70096 t-m/m
2
250.6781 t/m
41666667 mm
0.041667 m
10.44492 t-m/m
4.604233 x
83.81
0.25
For
1000
Z
mm of width
=
1000
250000
6
250.67814 x
0.041667
14.346 t-m/m
Along X-direction
19.326 t-m/m
Along Y-direction
0.75 x
x
0.5625 x
4.00
2
X x
0.2794 x
+
0.5 x
1.8 x 0.444444 x
0.2794 x
1.95 x
0.666667 x
+
1.8 x
X
3.621024 +
1.13157 +
0.11176 x
21.33333 +
=
=
14.11063 t-m
Design of cantilever Return:
Assuming
50 mm cover and
12 mm dia bars.
Effective depth available
=
500
50 20
=
+
0.2794 x
1.2
0.5 x
0.2794 x
Ast
x
1.8
1.8
d2
3.417
4.00
x
x
2.00
2.00
dx x
4.00 X
4.00 x
dx x
0.653796 x
10.66667
6=
424
mm
=
=
R
x
b
151.1111 x
0.179776 =
92.81768 t-m
14.11063 x
20400 x
10^6
0.888889 x
1835.283 mm
2
537.1559 mm /m
Ast/m
Provide
12 mm dia @
150
mm c/c providing
Provide
8 mm dia @
150
mm c/c providing
0.424
2
753.9822 mm on earth face.
2
335.1032 mm on other face.
Along Horizantal direction.
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
10.41044 +
51.57643 t-m
3.2532638 +
0.11176 x
101.3333 +
14.34644 +
x
dx
x
x
dx
51.57643
9.155
Ast
20 mm dia bars.
500
50 d2
1.000
20 -
7.75
X
-
40.66667
19.98013 t-m/m
19.32583 t-m/m
19.98013 t-m/m
420
mm
=
=
R
x
b
151.1111 x
0.1764 =
26.656 t-m
19.98013 x
20400 x
10^6
0.888889 x
2623.441 mm
2
2623.441 mm /m
Provide
25 mm dia @
180
mm c/c providing
Provide
12 mm dia @
180
mm c/c providing
Assuming
50 mm cover and
Effective depth available
=
500
0.42
Ast
10 =
Ast/m
5.75
7.75
0.653796 x
x
5.75
4.00
20 mm dia bars.
50 d2
1.000
0-
10 =
19.32583 t-m/m
440
mm
=
=
R
x
b
151.1111 x
0.1936 =
19.32583 x
20400 x
10^6
0.888889 x
2
2422.187 mm
2
2422.187 mm /m
Ast/m
Provide
25 mm dia @
190
mm c/c providing
Provide
16 mm dia @
190
mm c/c providing
29.25511 t-m
0.44
2
2583.547 mm on earth face.
2
1058.221 mm on other face.
Along Vertical direction.
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
DISTRIBUTION FACTOR
Active earth pressure
FOR NORMAL CASE, FA
unit wt of soil
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Ka
4.500 m
S.NO.
H (FROM TOP)
WIDTH OF RETURN AT THIS LEVEL
FORCE DUE TO EARTH PRESSURE
MOMENT DUE TO EARTH PRESSURE
FORCE DUE TO L.L. SURCHARGE
MOMENT DUE TO L.L. SURCHARGE
TOTAL HORI. FORCE FROM SUPERSTR.
UNITS
m
m
t
tm
t
tm
t
1
4.500
3.750
28.669
54.184
15.290
34.403
10.000
TOTAL MOMENT
DESIGN MOMENT
REQUIRED EFFECTIVE DEPTH
EFF. DEPTH AVAILABLE
AREA OF STEEL REQUIRED
DIAMETER OF BAR PROVIDED
TOTAL NO. OF BARS
tm
tm
m
m
cm2
mm
no.
cm2
88.586
88.586
1.211
3.600
13.569
32
4
32.17
O.K.
137.1
t
t/m2
%
MPa
t/m2
cm2/m
48.959
27.199
0.075
0.20
20.40
0.926
0.500
0.279
1.0
1.8
20
11.000 m
0.45
0.150 m
Design of Substructure
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
32
62
92
122
44
74
104
134
LOAD
FORCE-X
FORCE-Y
FORCE-Z
MOM-X
MOM-Y
MOM Z
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.41
7.77
3.41
-1.46
48.90
36.61
0.51
-1.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
165. FINISH
Design of Substructure
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
32
62
92
122
44
74
104
134
LOAD
FORCE-X
FORCE-Y
FORCE-Z
MOM-X
MOM-Y
MOM Z
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
47.28
24.88
35.69
21.01
16.41
10.19
10.88
8.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
165. FINISH
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
17-12-06
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
17-12-06
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
Design of Substructure
80.
137
81.
143
82.
149
83.
156
84.
162
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
122 130 131; 123 131 132; 124 132 133; 125 133 134; 126 134 135; 127 136
128 137 138; 129 138 139; 130 139 140; 131 140 141; 132 141 142; 133 142
134 143 144; 135 144 145; 136 145 146; 137 146 147; 138 147 148; 139 148
140 149 150; 141 151 152; 142 152 153; 143 153 154; 144 154 155; 145 155
146 156 157; 147 157 158; 148 158 159; 149 159 160; 150 160 161; 151 161
85. 152 162 163; 153 163 164; 154 164 165; 155 1 16; 156 16 31; 157 31 46
86. 158 46 61; 159 61 76; 160 76 91; 161 91 106; 162 106 121; 163 121 136
87. 164 136 151; 165 2 17; 166 17 32; 167 32 47; 168 47 62; 169 62 77; 170 77
92
88. 171 92 107; 172 107 122; 173 122 137; 174 137 152; 175 3 18; 176 18 33
89. 177 33 48; 178 48 63; 179 63 78; 180 78 93; 181 93 108; 182 108 123
90. 183 123 138; 184 138 153; 185 4 19; 186 19 34; 187 34 49; 188 49 64;
189 64 79
91. 190 79 94; 191 94 109; 192 109 124; 193 124 139; 194 139 154; 195 5 20
92. 196 20 35; 197 35 50; 198 50 65; 199 65 80; 200 80 95; 201 95 110; 202 110
125
93. 203 125 140; 204 140 155; 205 6 21; 206 21 36; 207 36 51; 208 51 66; 209
66 81
94. 210 81 96; 211 96 111; 212 111 126; 213 126 141; 214 141 156; 215 7 22
95. 216 22 37; 217 37 52; 218 52 67; 219 67 82; 220 82 97; 221 97 112; 222 112
127
96. 223 127 142; 224 142 157; 225 8 23; 226 23 38; 227 38 53; 228 53 68; 229
68 83
97. 230 83 98; 231 98 113; 232 113 128; 233 128 143; 234 143 158; 235 9 24
98. 236 24 39; 237 39 54; 238 54 69; 239 69 84; 240 84 99; 241 99 114; 242
114 129
99. 243 129 144; 244 144 159; 245 10 25; 246 25 40; 247 40 55; 248 55 70
100. 249 70 85; 250 85 100; 251 100 115; 252 115 130; 253 130 145; 254 145
160
101. 255 11 26; 256 26 41; 257 41 56; 258 56 71; 259 71 86; 260 86 101; 261
101 116
102. 262 116 131; 263 131 146; 264 146 161; 265 12 27; 266 27 42; 267 42 57
103. 268 57 72; 269 72 87; 270 87 102; 271 102 117; 272 117 132; 273 132
147
104. 274 147 162; 275 13 28; 276 28 43; 277 43 58; 278 58 73; 279 73 88;
280 88 103
105. 281 103 118; 282 118 133; 283 133 148; 284 148 163; 285 14 29; 286 29
44
106. 287 44 59; 288 59 74; 289 74 89; 290 89 104; 291 104 119; 292 119 134
107. 293 134 149; 294 149 164; 295 15 30; 296 30 45; 297 45 60; 298 60 75
108. 299 75 90; 300 90 105; 301 105 120; 302 120 135; 303 135 150; 304 150
165
109. DEFINE MATERIAL START
110. ISOTROPIC MATERIAL1
111. E 2.7386E+006
112. POISSON 0.156297
113. ISOTROPIC MATERIAL2
114. E 2.7386E+006
115. POISSON 0.15
116. DENSITY 2.4
117. END DEFINE MATERIAL
118. MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
32
62
LOAD
FORCE-X
FORCE-Y
FORCE-Z
MOM-X
MOM-Y
MOM Z
1
2
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
41.13
2.41
36.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Design of Substructure
92
122
44
74
104
134
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
5.94
36.88
4.41
41.13
0.89
41.13
2.41
36.88
4.41
36.88
4.41
41.13
2.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Design of Substructure
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
32
62
92
122
44
74
104
134
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.26
9.59
-7.46
4.32
-7.46
4.32
18.26
9.59
18.26
9.59
-7.46
4.32
-7.46
4.32
18.26
9.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
163. FINISH
MOM Z
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Seismic case
Calculation of seismic coefficient
Transverse direction
As per modified clause for interim measures for seismic provisions of IRC:6-2000
Ah
Z/2 x Sa/g
Horizantal seismic coefficient
=
R/I
Where Zone factor
0.10
Importance factor
1.50
2.00
D
1000xF
Where
D is appropriate dead load of superstructure and Live load
DL
184.71
SIDL
36.24
LL
112.38
2771.38
kN
DL+SIDL+50% LL
F is horizantal force required to be applied at centre of mass of superstructure for 1mm Horizantal
deflection at top of abutment along considered direction of motion
Relation between deflection at x from free end of cantilever , subjected to force 'F' at free end is given by
=
E I y
( L2.x/2)-(x3/6)-(L3/3)
27386.13
2793385.0
t/m2
172.80
m4
0.001
6.65
0.67
1.43
There fore
49
72161.98
kN
T
Sa/g
0.01
sec
2.50
Ah
0.075
Longitudinal direction
As per modified clause for interim measures for seismic provisions of IRC:6-2000
Z/2 x Sa/g
Ah
=
Horizantal seismic coefficient
R/I
Where Zone factor
0.10
Importance factor
I
1.50
=
Response reduction factor
R
=
2.50
Sa/g is average response acceleration coefficient for 5% damping depending upon fundamental
period of vibration T
2.00
D
1000xF
Where
D is appropriate dead load of superstructure and Live load
For longitudinal direction, live load is not to be considered.
DL+SILL
2209.48
kN
F is horizantal force required to be applied at centre of mass of superstructure for 1mm Horizantal
deflection at top of abutment along considered direction of motion
Relation between deflection at x from free end of cantilever , subjected to force 'F' at free end is given by
=
E I y
2
( L .x/2)-(x3/6)-(L3/3)
Modulus of elasticity of concrete
27386.13
2793385.0
t/m2
1.73
m4
0.001
6.65
There fore
Ground level
1.43
721.62
kn
T
Sa/g
0.11
sec
2.50
Ah
0.075
Height
2.206
0.5
5.149
Density
2.4
2.4
2.4
90.145
Length
12.0
12.0
12.0
Width
0.3
1.2
1.2
50
98.300
56
98.244
0.671
87.345
10.228
Seismic
Force
1.429
1.296
13.346
16.072
m
mm
m
m
m
m
L.A
Moment
9.552 13.654
8.199 10.626
4.875 65.056
89.336
0.274 m
11.173 m
1.2
12.155
DL
SIDL
LL 50%
16.57
172.05
Transverse direction
Weight
Force
L.A
moment
184.71 13.853
10.23
141.69
36.24
2.718
11.17
30.36
56.19
4.214
12.16
51.22
Total
20.785
223.27
Summary
seismic longitudinal case
Total load on piles for normal case
Additional horizantal force and moment due to seismic
(Live load not to be considered for longitudinal moment)
Reduction in longitudinal moment due to braking force
Reduction in transverse moment due to live load
P
1865.75
1865.75
51
ML
240.62
261.386
MT
193.39
-
-102.44
399.566
-193.39
0.00
240.62
-
193.39
312.61
-79.5 161.12
-96.70
409.31
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Load Case
I
1
II
1
Total Load
P
Seismic Longitudinal direction
1865.75
With L.L
Seismic Transverse direction
1865.75
With LL
No of Piles
Longitudinal Moment
ML
Transverse Moment
MT
399.57
0.00
161.12
409.31
12
0.75
4
12
3.6
3
11
3.75
0.6
6
3.6
2
10
3.6
1
9
8
0.75
0.75
3.6
3.6
0.75
8.7
Pile No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
x
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
0
0
0
0
103.68
ZL
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.8
0
0
0
0
y
5.4
1.8
1.8
5.4
5.4
1.8
1.8
5.4
5.4
1.8
1.8
5.4
194.4
52
ZT
36
108
108
36
36
108
108
36
36
108
108
36
12.3
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Case I
1
1
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
36.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
108.00
0.00
36.00
+ 409.31
36.00
+ 409.31
108.00
- 409.31
108.00
- 409.31
36.00
- 409.31
36.00
- 409.31
108.00
+ 409.31
108.00
+ 409.31
36.00
+ 409.31
36.00
+ 409.31
108.00
- 409.31
108.00
- 409.31
36.00
= 141.61 t
= 141.61 t
= 141.61 t
= 141.61 t
= 169.35 t
= 169.35 t
= 169.35 t
= 169.35 t
= 155.48 t
= 155.48 t
= 155.48 t
= 155.48 t
= 161.25 t
= 153.67 t
= 146.10 t
= 138.52 t
= 149.70 t
= 157.28 t
= 164.86 t
= 172.44 t
= 166.85 t
= 159.27 t
= 151.69 t
= 144.11 t
Seismic LongitudinalPmax
169.35
Pmin
141.61
172.44
Pmin
138.52
53
172.44 t
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
=
=
6.36
16.57
t
t
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
16.07
39.00
12.00
3.25
442.33
36.86
40.11
169.35
141.61
t
t
t per pile
t
t per pile
t per pile
E x I
5
R =
K1
E x I
E = Youngs modulus
kg/m2
K1 = Constant
kg/cm3
K2
kg/cm2
4
I = moment of inertia of pile cross section cm
K2
Dia of pile
1.20
E =
m
5000 x
I = 3.14 x
64
K1
120 ^ 4
35
2
= 301533 kg/cm
4
= 10178760 cm
0.775
K2
T
R
= 330.78
0
=
= 87.35
= 87.35
73.845
87.35
L1
=
=
=
T
Lf
2.19
T
Lf
724.42 cm
54
1350 cm
0
cm
0
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
= 40.111 x 724.42
12 x 301533 x 10178760
=
0.414
cm
= 4.14 mm
In seismic case as permissble increase in deflection is 33%, hence
6.65 mm > 4.1402 mm
Permissible deflection = 5 x 1.33 =
Maximum Moment
= 145.29 t-m
MF = Q x L1 + Lf
2
M
M
= m x
F
= 0.83 x 145.29
= 120.59 t-m
Reinforcement in pile:
Provide
Provide
25 mm
dia
2
137.44 cm
28 nos
mm Rings at
180 mm c/c
55
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Number of Piles
Horizantal force in Normal condition due to earth
Therefore Total Horizantal force per pile
Maximum Load on the Pile
Minimum Load on the Pile
t
t
t
t
t
12.050
16.571
4.214
16.072
36.86
12.00
3.071
442.33
37.865
37.99
172.44
138.52
t per pile
t
t per pile
t per pile
E x I
5
R =
K1
E x I
E = Youngs modulus
kg/m2
K1 = Constant
kg/cm3
K2
kg/cm2
4
I = moment of inertia of pile cross section cm
K2
Dia of pile
1.20
E =
610.73
5000 x
I = 3.14 x
64
K1
120
35
2
= 301533 kg/cm
4
= 10178760 cm
0.775
K2
T
R
= 330.78
0
=
= 87.35
= 87.35
73.845
87.35
L1
=
=
=
T
Lf
2.19
T
Lf
724.42 cm
56
1350 cm
0
cm
0
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
= 37.99 x 724.42
12 x 301533 x 10178760
=
0.392
cm
= 3.92 mm
in seismic transverse case permissible increase in deflection = 1.33 x 5 = 6.65 mm > 3.92 mm
Maximum Moment
MF = Q x
M
L1 + Lf
2
M
= m x
F
= 0.83 x 137.6
137.6
t-m
= 114.21 t-m
Reinforcement in pile:
Provide
Provide
25 mm
dia
2
137.44 cm
28 nos
mm Rings at
180 mm c/c
57
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
SOLUTION
RO=OUTER RADIUS=D/2
RI=RADIUS OF REINFORCEMENT RING=D/2-C
T= THICK.REINFORCEMENT RING = AS/2*3.142*RI
B=BD*PI/180
B1=COS(B)
A=ALPHA ANGLE=ACOS (RO*B1/RI)
RECOSB=RICOSA
B2=SIN(B)^3
B3=SIN(4*B)
B4=SIN(2*B)
A=COS(A)
A2=SIN(2*A)
A3=SIN(A)
NUM1=(PI-B)/8+B3/32+B1*B2/3
NUM2=2*(RO^3)/(1+B1)
NUM3=(RI^3) *T/(RO+RI*A1)
NUM4=(M-1) *PI+A-A2/2
NUM = NUMINATOR = NUM2*NUM1+NUM3*NUM4
DENM1=2*(RO^2)/(1+B1)
DENM2=B2/3+(PI-B)*B1/2+B1*B4/4
DENM3=2*(RI^2) * T/ (RO+RI*A1)
DENM4=(M-1) *PI*A1-A3+A*A1
DENM=DENOMINATOR=DENM1*DENM2+DENM3*DENM4
CHECK FOR ECCENTRICITIES
CALCULATED ECCENTRICITY EC = NUM/DENM
ACTUAL ECCENTRICITY
EC = M/P
CHECK FOR STRESSES
NAC=DEPTH OF N.A.BELOW CENT.AXIS=RO*COS(B)
NAD=DEPTH OF N.A FROM TOP=RO+NAC
DE=EFFECTIVE DEPTH=D-C
CC=COMP. STRESS IN CONC. IN T/SQM=P/DENM
TS=TENS.STRESS IN STEEL (T/SQM)
PERMISSIBLE COMP.STRESS IN Concrete 50% increase (in t/sq.m)
PERMISSIBLE TENSILE STRESS IN Steel 50% increase(in t/sq.m)
Hence stresses in conc and steel are within permissible limits, hence safe.
58
0.600
0.525
0.004
1.718
-0.147
1.740
0.600
0.525
0.004
1.817
-0.244
1.853
0.968
0.557
-0.291
-0.168
-0.331
0.986
0.148
0.507
0.001
30.18
0.110
0.844
0.229
0.004
-6.03
0.166
0.912
0.834
-0.473
-0.279
-0.536
0.960
0.117
0.571
0.001
30.40
0.107
0.952
0.171
0.005
-9.36
0.116
0.666
0.712
0.929
0.852
-0.088
0.512
1.125
1021
12233
1785
30600
-0.146
0.454
1.125
1224
18115
1785
30600
Design of Substructure
CEG.Ltd.,Jaipur
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
SOLUTION
RO=OUTER RADIUS=D/2
RI=RADIUS OF REINFORCEMENT RING=D/2-C
T= THICK.REINFORCEMENT RING = AS/2*3.142*RI
B=BD*PI/180
B1=COS(B)
A=ALPHA ANGLE=ACOS (RO*B1/RI)
RECOSB=RICOSA
B2=SIN(B)^3
B3=SIN(4*B)
B4=SIN(2*B)
A=COS(A)
A2=SIN(2*A)
A3=SIN(A)
NUM1=(PI-B)/8+B3/32+B1*B2/3
NUM2=2*(RO^3)/(1+B1)
NUM3=(RI^3) *T/(RO+RI*A1)
NUM4=(M-1) *PI+A-A2/2
NUM = NUMINATOR = NUM2*NUM1+NUM3*NUM4
DENM1=2*(RO^2)/(1+B1)
DENM2=B2/3+(PI-B)*B1/2+B1*B4/4
DENM3=2*(RI^2) * T/ (RO+RI*A1)
DENM4=(M-1) *PI*A1-A3+A*A1
DENM=DENOMINATOR=DENM1*DENM2+DENM3*DENM4
CHECK FOR ECCENTRICITIES
CALCULATED ECCENTRICITY EC = NUM/DENM
ACTUAL ECCENTRICITY
EC = M/P
CHECK FOR STRESSES
NAC=DEPTH OF N.A.BELOW CENT.AXIS=RO*COS(B)
NAD=DEPTH OF N.A FROM TOP=RO+NAC
DE=EFFECTIVE DEPTH=D-C
CC=COMP. STRESS IN CONC. IN T/SQM=P/DENM
TS=TENS.STRESS IN STEEL (T/SQM)
PERMISSIBLE COMP.STRESS IN Concrete 50% increase (in t/sq.m)
PERMISSIBLE TENSILE STRESS IN Steel 50% increase(in t/sq.m)
Hence stresses in conc and steel are within permissible limits, hence safe.
59
0.600
0.525
0.004
1.696
-0.125
1.714
0.600
0.525
0.004
1.805
-0.232
1.840
0.977
0.479
-0.247
-0.142
-0.282
0.990
0.155
0.493
0.001
30.13
0.111
0.822
0.243
0.004
-5.26
0.177
0.920
0.807
-0.452
-0.266
-0.512
0.964
0.121
0.563
0.001
30.37
0.108
0.938
0.178
0.005
-8.96
0.122
0.628
0.662
0.884
0.825
-0.075
0.525
1.125
974
11120
1785
30600
-0.139
0.461
1.125
1136
16389
1785
30600
0.075
0.075
Length
12.0
12.0
12.0
Width
0.3
1.2
1.2
Height
2.206
0.50
5.149
Density
2.4
2.4
2.4
Lever arm for the loads from super structure for moment at base of abutment wall
Formation level
98.300
Wearing coat
56
Top of deck slab
98.244
Distance of CG of super structure below deck slab top
0.671
Pile cap Top
89.145
Pile cap bottom
87.345
Lever arm for DL
8.428
Distance of CG of SIDL above deck slab top
Level arm for SIDL
Seismic
Force
1.429
1.296
13.346
16.072
L.A
Moment
7.752 11.081
6.399
8.293
3.075 41.033
60.407
m
mm
m
m
m
m
0.274 m
9.373 m
1.2
10.355
DL
SIDL
Longitudinal direction
Weight
Force
L.A
moment
184.71
13.85
8.428
116.75
36.24
2.72
9.373
25.47
Total
DL
SIDL
LL 50%
16.57
142.22
Transverse direction
Weight
Force
L.A
moment
184.71 13.853
8.43
116.75
36.24
2.718
9.37
25.47
56.19
4.214
10.36
43.64
Total
20.785
185.86
Summary
seismic longitudinal case
Total load on abutment shaft for normal case
Additional horizantal force and moment due to seismic
(Live load not to be considered for longitudinal moment)
Reduction in longitudinal moment due to braking force
Reduction in transverse moment due to live load
P
597.30
-
597.30
2
Stress in concrete due to loads
=
87.29 kg/cm
Stress in steel due to loads
=
2015.78
The stresses are well within permissible limits.
seismic Transverse case
Total load on abutment shaft for normal case
597.30
Additional horizantal force and moment due to seismic
(Only 50%% live load is to be considered for transverse moment)
Reduction in longitudinal moment due to braking force
Reduction in transverse moment due to live load
597.30
2
Stress in concrete due to loads
=
80.16 kg/cm
Stress in steel due to loads
=
1745.81
The stresses are within permissible limits.
60
ML
1382.00
202.629
-102.44
1482.190
<
<
1382.00
-
MT
194.00
-194.00
0.00
2
153.00 kg/cm
2
3058.80 kg/cm
194.00
246.27
-84.340 1297.66
<
<
-96.70
343.57
2
153.00 kg/cm
2
3058.80 kg/cm
=
=
1.200 m
12.000 m
=
=
=
=
Axial Load
Mxx
Myy
=
=
=
10.0
10.0
153.00 Kg/cm^2
3058.50 Kg/cm^2
597.300 T
1482.190 Tm
.010 Tm
=
=
=
=
=
=
Axial Load
Mxx
Myy
=
=
=
1.200 m
12.000 m
10.0
10.0
153.00 Kg/cm^2
3058.50 Kg/cm^2
597.300 T
1297.660 Tm
343.570 Tm
61
CEG.Ltd., Jaipur
DESIGN OF SUPERSTRUCTURE