0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
4 vues1 page
Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the event of armed conflict, 26 mars 1999, 2253 UNTS 21. 5, 32 the treaty of Versailles, 28 juin 1919. 12,23 Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations, Commentary in Report of International Law Commission on the Work of its Sixty-Third Session, U.N. Doc.A / 66 / 10, (2011).
Description originale:
Titre original
Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict
Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the event of armed conflict, 26 mars 1999, 2253 UNTS 21. 5, 32 the treaty of Versailles, 28 juin 1919. 12,23 Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations, Commentary in Report of International Law Commission on the Work of its Sixty-Third Session, U.N. Doc.A / 66 / 10, (2011).
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the event of armed conflict, 26 mars 1999, 2253 UNTS 21. 5, 32 the treaty of Versailles, 28 juin 1919. 12,23 Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations, Commentary in Report of International Law Commission on the Work of its Sixty-Third Session, U.N. Doc.A / 66 / 10, (2011).
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, 26 March 1999, 2253 UNTS 21, ....................................... 5, 32 The Treaty of Versailles, 28 June 1919............................................................................... 25,27 Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331 ............................ 12,23 Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations, Commentary in Report of International Law Commission on the Work of its Sixty-Third Session, U.N. Doc.A/66/10, (2011) .............................................................................................................................. 17,18 Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in Report of the Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-third Session, UNGAOR, 56th Session, Supp.No.10, UN Doc. A/56/10 (2001).............................................................25,26,27,28,36 S.C.Res.788 UNSCOR, 1992, U.N.Doc S/RES/788 ........................................................... 5, 12 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res. 217A(III), UNGAOR, 1948, Supp. No.13, UN Doc. A/810 71 .....................................................................................................24,27,31 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. USA), Merits, Judgment [1986], ICJ Rep. 14................................................................. 3,10,14,15,16,18,35 Prosecutor v. Strugar, IT-01-42-T, Trial Chamber Judgment (31 January 2005) 279 ICTY ......................................................................................................................................... 29,30 Gray, International Law and the Use of Force, 2d ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)................................................................................................................................ 10,12 R. Jennings & A. Watts, eds, Oppenheim`s International Law, 9th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992) ...........................................................................................1,12,13,21 The UK Ministry of Defence, Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) ................................................................................................... 32,34 Y. Sandoz et al. eds, Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8th June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, (Geneva: ICRC & Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987) ......................................................................................................................................... 32,33 Yoram Dinstein, War, Agression and Self Defence, 3d ed (Cambridge University Press: 2003) ......................................................................................................................................... 14,35 Edward Collins, Jr. & Timothy M. Cole, Regime Legitimation in Instances of Coup-Caused Government-In-Exile: The Cases of Presidents Makarios (1996) 5 J. INT'L L. & PRAC 199-238................................................................................................................................ 2,5 K. Nowrot & E.W. Schabacker, The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOWAS Intervention in Sierra Leone (1998) 14 Am. U. Int`l LR ........................................................................................................................................ 1,5 Pasquale de Sena and Francesca de Vittor, State Immunity and Human Rights: The Italian Supreme Court Decision on the Ferrini Case (2005) 16 Eur. J. Intl L 89 .................... 19,20 Stefan Talmon, Who is a Legitimate Government in Exile? Towards Normative Criteria for Governmental Legitimacy in International Law, in Guy S. Goodwin & Stefan Talmon, eds, The Reality Of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie (Oxford: Oxford University Press,1999) .................................................................................................. 1,2,4,6 Prefecture of Voiotia v. Federal Republic of Germany, Areios Pagos, case n. 11/2000, 4 May 2000, ILR vol, 129 (2007) 514 ....................................................................................... 20,21