Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
See liitz lischei, Geron,s A:s :n |e F:rs Vor|J Vor (New Yoik W. W.
Noiton, 1ve [1ve1]), idem, Vor o[ I||vs:ons Geron Po|:c:es [ro 1^11 o 1^1o
(New Yoik W. W. Noiton, 1v [1vev]), Maiian Jackson, tians., lmanuel Geiss,
}v|, 1^1o Te Ov|reo| o[ |e F:rs Vor|J Vor, Se|eceJ Docvens (New Yoik
Chailes Sciibneis, 1ve [1ve!e.]), and idem, Geron Fore:gn Po|:c,, 1811^1o
. GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
the motives of theii own states.) Te ieseaiches of the lischei school
foiced ceitain minoi ievisions in the eailiei geneially accepted view.
But the histoiiogiaphical pendulum has now swung much too
fai in the lischei diiection. loieign histoiians have tended to ac-
cept his analysis wholesale, peihaps because it t theii image of
Geiman histoiy, deteimined laigely by the expeiience of Hitleis
Geimany and the Second Woild Wai.
e
Te editois of an Ameiican
iefeience woik on Woild Wai l, foi example, state outiight that
Kaisei and [the Geiman] loieign Oce . . . along with the Geneial
Sta . . . puiposely used the ciisis [caused by the assassination of
lianz leidinand] to biing about a geneial Euiopean wai. Tiuth is
simple, iefieshingly simple.
Well, maybe not so simple. liitz Stein wained that while the
legend piopagated in the inteiwai peiiod by some nationalistic Gei-
man histoiians of theii goveinments total innocence has been ef-
fectively exploded, in some quaiteis theie is a tendency to cieate a
legend in ieveise by suggesting Geimanys sole guilt, and thus to
peipetuate the legend in a dieient foim.
c
PviiUui 1o W~v
Te ioots of the liist Woild Wai ieach back to the last decades
of the nineteenth centuiy.
v
Afei liances defeat by Piussia, the
(London Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1v). Te woik by John W. Langdon, }v|,
1^1o Te Long De|oe, 1^181^^h (New Yoik Beig, 1vv1) is a useful histoiiogiaph-
ical suivey, fiom a lischeiite viewpoint.
e
H. W. Koch, lntioduction, in idem, Or:g:ns, p. 11.
Chailes Callan Tansill, Aer:co Goes o Vor (Gloucestei, Mass. Petei Smith,
1ve! [1v!c]), pp. zezc. Cf. the comment by Peteison, ProogonJo [or Vor, p. 1c
Te Ameiican aiistociacy was distinctly Anglophile.
c
Philip Knightley, Te F:rs Cosvo|, (New Yoik Haicouit Biace Jovanovich,
1v), pp. cz, 1zcz1, Peteison, ProogonJo [or Vor, John Moigan Read, Aroc
:, ProogonJo, 1^1o1^1^ (New Haven, Conn. Yale Univeisity Piess, 1v.1), and
the classic by Aithui Ponsonby, Fo|se|ooJ :n Vor:e (New Yoik E. P. Duuon,
1vzc). Tat unagging apologist foi global inteiventionism, Robeit H. leiiell,
in Aer:con D:|ooc, A H:sor,, !id ed. (New Yoik W. W. Noiton, 1v),
pp. .c1, could nd nothing to object to in the seciet piopaganda eoit to
embioil the United States in a woild wai. lt was simply pait of the aits of
WORLD WAR l THE TURNlNG POlNT z!
the Hun, in the view of Ameiican suppoiteis of Englands cause,
was to show his most hideous face at sea.
A:ivic~ Gois 1o W~v
With the onset of wai in Euiope, hostilities began in the Noith At-
lantic which eventually piovided the contextoi iathei, pietext
foi Ameiicas paiticipation. lmmediately, questions of the iights of
neutials and belligeients leapt to the foie.
ln 1vcv, an inteinational confeience had pioduced the Declaia-
tion of London, a statement of inteinational law as it applied to wai
at sea. Since it was not iatied by all the signatoiies, the Declaiation
nevei came into eect. Howevei, once wai staited the United States
inquiied whethei the belligeients weie willing to abide by its stip-
ulations. Te Cential Poweis agieed, pioviding the Entente did the
same. Te Biitish agieed, with ceitain modications, which eec-
tively negated the Declaiation.
v
Biitish modications included
adding a laige numbei of pieviously fiee items to the conditional
contiaband list and changing the status of key iaw mateiialsmost
impoitant of all, foodto absolute contiaband, allegedly because
they could be used by the Geiman aimy.
Te tiaditional undeistanding of inteinational law on this point
was expounded a decade and a half eailiei by the Biitish Piime
Ministei, Loid Salisbuiy
loodstus, with a hostile destination, can be consideied
contiaband of wai only if they aie supplies foi the enemys
foices. lt is not sucient that they aie capable of being so
used, it must be shown that this was in fact theii destination
at the time of the seizuie.
ec
Tat had also been the histoiical position of the U.S. goveinment.
But in 1v1. the Biitish claimed the iight to captuie food as well
as othei pieviously conditional contiaband destined not only foi
hostile but even foi nevro| poits, on the pietense that they would
peaceful peisuasion, of Public Relations, he claimed to believe, since theie is
nothing wiong with one countiy iepiesenting its cause to anothei countiy. One
wondeis what leiiell would have said to a similai campaign by Nazi Geimany
oi the Soviet Union.
v
Tansill, Aer:co Goes o Vor, pp. 1!ez.
ec
lbid., p. 1.c.
z. GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
ultimately ieach Geimany and thus the Geiman aimy. ln ieality, the
aimwas, as Chuichill, liist Loid of the Admiialty candidly admiued,
to staive the whole populationmen, women, and childien, old
and young, wounded and soundinto submission.
e1
Biitain now assumed piactically complete contiol ovei all neu-
tial tiade, in at violation of inteinational laws.
ez
Astiong piotest
was piepaied by State Depaitment lawyeis but nevei sent. lnstead,
Colonel House and Spiing-Rice, the Biitish Ambassadoi, confeiied
and came up with an alteinative. Denying that the new note was
even a foimal piotest, the United States politely iequested that
London ieconsidei its policy. Te Biitish expiessed theii appiecia-
tion foi the Ameiican viewpoint, and quietly iesolved to continue
with theii violations.
e!
ln Novembei, 1v1., the Biitish Admiialty announced, suppos-
edly in iesponse to the discoveiy of a Geiman ship unloading mines
o the English coast, that hencefoith the whole of the Noith Sea
was a militaiy aiea, oi wai zone, which would be mined, and
into which neutial ships pioceeded at theii own iisk. Te Biitish
action was in blatant contiavention of inteinational lawincluding
the Declaiation of Paiis, of 1ce, which Biitain had signedamong
othei ieasons, because it conspicuously failed to meet the ciiteiia
foi a legal blockade.
e.
e1
Cited in Peteison, ProogonJo [or Vor, p. c!. As Loid Devlin put it, the Admi-
ialtys oideis weie cleai enough. All food consigned to Geimany thiough neu-
tial poits was to be captuied, and all food consigned to Roueidam was to be pie-
sumed consigned to Geimany. . . . Te Biitish weie deteimined on the staivation
policy, whethei oi not it was lawful. Patiick Devlin, Too ProvJ o F:g| VooJro+
V:|sons Nevro|:, (New Yoik Oxfoid Univeisity Piess, 1v), pp. 1v!, 1v.
ez
Edwin Boichaid and William Pootei Lage, Nevro|:, [or |e Un:eJ Soes
(New Haven, Conn. Yale Univeisity Piess, 1v!), p. e1.
e!
Boichaid and Lage, Nevro|:,, pp. ezz. Te U.S. ambassadoi in London,
Waltei Hines Page, was alieady showing his colois. ln Octobei, he sent a tele-
giam to the State Depaitment, denouncing any Ameiican piotests against Biitish
inteifeience with neutial iights. Tis is not a wai in the sense we have hitheito
used the woid. lt is a woild-clash of systems of goveinment, a stiuggle to the ex-
teimination of English civilization oi of Piussian militaiy autociacy. Piecedents
have gone to the sciap heap.
e.
See Ralph Raico, Te Politics of Hungei A Review, in Re+:e+ o[ Avsr:on
Fcono:cs, vol. ! (1vcv), p. z., and the souices cited. Te aiticle is included in
the piesent volume.
WORLD WAR l THE TURNlNG POlNT z
Te Biitish moves meant that Ameiican commeice with Gei-
many was eectively ended, as the United States became the aisenal
of the Entente. Bound now by nancial as well as sentimental ties
to England, much of Ameiican big business woiked in one way oi
anothei foi the Allied cause. Te House of J. P. Moigan, which
volunteeied itself as cooidinatoi of supplies foi Biitain, consulted
iegulaily with the Wilson administiation in its nancial opeiations
foi the Entente. Te Vo|| Sree }ovrno| and othei oigans of the
business elite weie noisily pio-Biitish at eveiy tuin, until we weie
nally biought into the Euiopean fiay.
e
Te United States iefused to join the Scandinavian neutials in
objecting to the closing of the Noith Sea, noi did it send a piotest
of its own.
ee
Howevei, when, in lebiuaiy, 1v1, Geimany declaied
the wateis aiound the Biitish lsles a wai zone, in which enemy
meichant ships weie liable to be destioyed, Beilin was put on notice
if any Ameiican vessels oi Ameiican lives should be lost thiough
U-boat action, Geimany would be held to a stiict accountability.
e
ln Maich, a Biitish steamship, Fo|o|o, caiiying munitions and
passengeis, was toipedoed, iesulting in the death of one Ameiican,
among otheis. Te ensuing note to Beilin entienched Wilsons pie-
posteious doctiinethat the United States had the iight and duty
to piotect Ameiicans sailing on ships ying a |e||:geren ag. Latei,
John Basseu Mooie, foi ovei thiity yeais piofessoi of inteinational
law at Columbia, long-time membei of the Hague Tiibunal, and,
afei the wai, a judge at the lnteinational Couit of Justice, stated of
this and of an equally absuid Wilsonian piinciple
what most decisively contiibuted to the involvement of the
United States in the wai was the asseition of a iight to piotect
belligeient ships on which Ameiicans saw t to tiavel and
the tieatment of aimed belligeient meichantmen as peaceful
e
Tansill, Aer:co Goes o Vor, pp. 1!z!! Te Wall Stieet Jouinal was nevei
tioubled by a policy of editoiial neutiality, and as the wai piogiessed it lost no
oppoitunity to condemn the Cential Poweis in the most unmeasuied teims.
ee
lbid., pp. 1c.
e
Robeit M. La lollete, the piogiessive senatoi fiom Wisconsin, scathingly
exposed Wilsons double standaid in a speech on the Senate ooi two days afei
Wilsons call foi wai. lt is iepiinted in the vital collection, Muiiay Polnei and
Tomas E. Woods, Ji., eds., Ve V|o DoreJ o So, No o Vor Aer:con An:+or
Vr::ng [ro 181. o No+ (New Yoik Basic Books, zccc), pp. 1z!!z.
ze GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
vessels. Both assumptions weie contiaiy to ieason and to
seuled law, and no othei piofessed neutial advanced them.
ec
Wilson had placed Ameiica on a diiect collision couise with Gei-
many.
On May , 1v1, came the most famous incident in the Noith
Atlantic wai. Te Biitish linei Lvs:on:o was sunk, with the loss
of 1,1v lives, including 1z. Ameiicans, by fai the laigest numbei
of Ameiican victims of Geiman submaiines befoie oui entiy into
the wai.
ev
Teie was outiage in the eastein seaboaid piess and
thioughout the Ameiican social elite and political class. Wilson
was livid. A note was ied o to Beilin, ieiteiating the piinciple of
stiict accountability, and concluding, ominously, that Geimany
will not expect the Goveinment of the United States to omit
any woid oi any act necessaiy to the peifoimance of its
sacied duty of maintaining the iights of the United States
and its citizens and of safeguaiding theii fiee exeicise and
enjoyment.
c
At this time, the Biitish ieleased the Biyce Repoit on Belgian
atiocities. A woik of iaw Entente piopaganda, though pioting
fiom the name of the distinguished English wiitei, the Repoit un-
deiscoied the tiue natuie of the unspeakable Hun.
1
Anglophiles ev-
eiywheie weie eniaged. Te Republican Paity establishment iaised
the ante on Wilson, demanding imei action. Te gieat majoiity of
ec
Peteison, ProogonJo [or Vor, p. 11z. Cf. Boichaid and Lage, Nevro|:,,
p. 1!e (emphasis in oiiginal) theie was no piecedent oi legal waiiant foi a neu-
tial to piotect a |e||:geren ship fiom auack by its enemy because it happened to
have on boaid Ameiican citizens. Te exclusive juiisdiction of the countiy of the
vessels ag, to which all on boaid aie subject, is an unchallengeable iule of law.
ev
On the possible involvement of Winston Chuichill, liist Loid of the Admi-
ialty, in the genesis of this disastei, see Rethinking Chuichill, in the piesent
volume.
c
Tomas G. Pateison, ed., Mojor Pro||es :n Aer:con Fore:gn Po|:c,. Docv
ens onJ Fsso,s, vol. z, S:nce 1^1o, znd ed. (Lexington, Mass. D. C. Heath, 1vc),
pp. !c!z.
1
On the fiaudulence of the Biyce Repoit, see Read, Aroc:, ProogonJo,
pp. zc1cc, Peteison, ProogonJo [or Vor, pp. 1c, and Knightley, Te F:rs
Cosvo|,, pp. c!c., 1c.
WORLD WAR l THE TURNlNG POlNT z
Ameiicans, who devoutly wished to avoid wai, had no spokesmen
within the leadeiship of eithei of the majoi paities. Ameiica was
beginning to ieap the benets of oui divinely appointed bipaitisan
foieign policy.
ln theii ieply to the State Depaitment note, the Geimans ob-
seived that submaiine waifaie was a iepiisal foi the illegal hungei
blockade, that the Lvs:on:o was caiiying munitions of wai, that
it was iegisteied as an auxiliaiy ciuisei of the Biitish Navy, that
Biitish meichant ships had been diiected to iam oi ie upon sui-
facing U-boats, and that the Lvs:on:o had been aimed.
z
Wilsons Secietaiy of State, William Jennings Biyan, tiied to
ieason with the Piesident Geimany has a iight to pievent contia-
band going to the Allies, and a ship caiiying contiaband should not
iely upon passengeis to piotect hei fiom auackit would be like
puuing women and childien in fiont of an aimy. He ieminded Wil-
son that a pioposed Ameiican compiomise, wheieby Biitain would
allow food into Geimany and the Geimans would abandon subma-
iine auacks on meichant ships, had been welcomed by Geimany but
iejected by England. linally, Biyan bluited out Why be shocked
by the diowning of a few people, if theie is to be no objection to
staiving a nation`
!
ln June, convinced that the Administiation
was headed foi wai, Biyan iesigned.
.
Te Biitish blockade was taking a heavy toll, and in lebiuaiy,
1v1e, Geimany announced that enemy meichant ships, except pas-
sengei lineis, would be tieated as auxiliaiy ciuiseis, liable to be
auacked without waining. Te State Depaitment counteied with a
declaiation that, in the absence of conclusive evidence of aggies-
sive puipose in each individual case, aimed belligeient meichant
z
Tansill, Aer:co Goes o Vor, p. !z!. Te Geiman captain of the U-boat that
sank the Lvs:on:o afeiwaids pointed out that Biitish captains of meichant ships
had alieady been decoiated oi given bounties foi iamming oi auempting to iam
suifaced submaiines, see also Peteison, ProogonJo [or Vor, p. 11..
!
William Jennings Biyan and Maiy Baiid Biyan, Te Meo:rs o[ V:||:o }en
n:ngs Br,on (Philadelphia John C. Winston, 1vz), pp. !vvv, Tansill, Aer:co
Goes o Vor, pp. zcv.
.
To my mind, Biyans antiwai position and piincipled iesignation moie than
make up foi his views on evolution, despite H. L. Menckens auempted demolition
of Biyan in a well-known essay.
zc GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
ships enjoyed all the immunities of peaceful vessels.
Wilson ie-
jected Congiessional calls at least to issue a waining to Ameiicans
tiaveling on aimed meichant ships that they did so at theii own iisk.
Duiing the Mexican civil wai, he had cautioned Ameiicans against
tiaveling in Mexico.
e
But now Wilson stubboinly iefused.
Auention shifed to the sea wai once moie when a liench
passengei ship, the Svsse:, beaiing no ag oi maikings, was sunk by
a U-boat, and seveial Ameiicans injuied. A haish Ameiican piotest
elicited the so-called Svsse: pledge fiom a Geiman goveinment
anxious to avoid a bieak Geimany would cease auacking without
waining enemy meichant ships found in the wai zone. Tis was
made explicitly conditioned, howevei, on the piesumption that the
Goveinment of the United States will now demand and insist that
the Biitish Goveinment shall foithwith obseive the iules of inteina-
tional law. ln tuin, Washington cuitly infoimed the Geimans that
theii own iesponsibility was absolute, in no way contingent on the
conduct of any othei powei.
Boichaid and Lage, Nevro|:,, pp. 1zzz.. John Basseu Mooie was scathing
in his denunciation of Wilsons new doctiine, that an aimed meichant ship en-
joyed all the iights of an unaimed one. Citing piecedents going back to Supieme
Couit Justice John Maishall, Mooie stated that By the position actually taken,
the United States was commiued, while piofessing to be a neutial, to maintain
a belligeient position. Alex Mathews Aineu, C|ovJe K:d:n onJ |e V:|son Vor
Po|:c:es (New Yoik Russell and Russell, 1v1 [1v!]), pp. 1c.
e
ln fact, duiing the Mexican conict, Wilson had piohibited outiight the ship-
ment of aims to Mexico. As late as August, 1v1!, he declaied l shall follow the
best piactice of nations in this mauei of neutiality by foibidding the expoitation
of aims oi munitions of wai of any kind fiom the United States to any pait of the
Republic of Mexico. Tansill, Aer:co Goes o Vor, p. e..
ln the next
centuiy, it is not impossible that his bulldog likeness will featuie in
the logo of the New Woild Oidei.
Let it be fieely conceded that in 1v.c Chuichill played his iole
supeibly. As the militaiy histoiian, Majoi-Geneial J. l. C. lullei, a
shaip ciitic of Chuichills waitime policies, wiote Chuichill was
a man cast in the heioic mould, a beiseikei evei ieady to lead a
foiloin hope oi stoim a bieach, and at his best when things weie
at theii woist. His glamoious ihetoiic, his pugnacity, and his insis-
tence on annihilating the enemy appealed to human instincts, and
made him an outstanding wai leadei.
e
Histoiy outdid heiself when
she cast Chuichill as the adveisaiy in the duel with Hitlei. lt maueis
liule that in his most famous speechwe shall ght them on the
beaches . . . we shall ght them in the elds and in the stieetshe
plagiaiized Clemenceau at the time of the Ludendoi oensive in
the Gieat Wai, that theie was liule ieal thieat of a Geiman invasion
oi, that, peihaps, theie was no ieason foi the duel to have occuiied
in the ist place. loi a few months in 1v.c, Chuichill played his
pait magnicently and unfoigeuably.
loi a skeptical account of Chuichill in this peiiod, see Clive Ponting, 1^oh
M,| onJ Reo|:, (Chicago lvan R. Dee, 1vv1).
c
Cf. A. J. P. Tayloi, Te Statesman, in idem, et al., C|vrd:|| Re+:seJ ACr::co|
Assessen (New Yoik Dial Piess, 1vev), p. ze.
v
Heniy Pelling, V:nson C|vrd:|| (New Yoik Duuon, 1v.), pp. !..c, !,
and Paul Addison, C|vrd:|| on |e Hoe Fron, pp. zvevv.
e GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
spieading wild iumois of the giowing stiength of the Geiman navy,
just as he did in the 1v!cs about the buildup of the Geiman Aii loice.
1c
He auacked socialism befoie and afei Woild Wai l, while duiing
the Wai he piomoted wai socialism, calling foi nationalization of
the iailioads, and declaiing in a speech Oui whole nation must
be oiganized, must be socialized if you like the woid.
11
Chuichills
oppoitunism continued to the end. ln the 1v. election, he biiey
latched on to Hayeks Te RooJ o Ser[Jo and tiied to paint the
Laboui Paity as totalitaiian, while it was Chuichill himself who, in
1v.!, had accepted the Beveiidge plans foi the post-wai welfaie state
and Keynesian management of the economy. Tioughout his caieei
his one guiding iule was to climb to powei and stay theie.
1z
Teie +ere two piinciples that foi a long while seemed deai to
Chuichills heait. One was anti-Communism he was an eaily and
feivent opponent of Bolshevism. loi yeais, heveiy coiiectly
deciied the bloody baboons and foul muideieis of Moscow. His
deep eaily admiiation of Benito Mussolini was iooted in his shiewd
appieciation of what Mussolini had accomplished (oi so Chuichill
thought). ln an ltaly teeteiing on the biink of Leninist ievolution,
ll Duce had discoveied the one foimula that could counteiact the
Leninist appeal hypeinationalism with a social slant. Chuichill
lauded lascismos tiiumphant stiuggle against the bestial appetites
and passions of Leninism, claiming that it pioved the necessaiy
antidote to the Communist poison.
1!
1c
Tayloi, Te Statesman, p. !1, Robeit Rhodes James, Chuichill the Politi-
cian, in A. J. P. Tayloi, et al., C|vrd:|| Re+:seJ, p. 11, wiites of Chuichills
extiemely exaggeiated claims of Geiman aii powei.
11
Emiys Hughes, V:nson C|vrd:|| Br::s| Bv||Jog (New Yoik Exposition,
1v), p. 1c..
1z
Cf. Simon Jenkins, (SvnJo, T:es, August ze, zcc) As foi [Geitiude]
Himmelfaibs apotheosis of the evei-devious Chuichill, this is now histoiical
anachionism. Tiue, Chuichills political peiception was sometimes iight, but it
was moie ofen wiong and had liule moial compass beyond his own eccentiicities.
As ideologues, both he and Disiaeli might be teimed Blaiiites, seizing the catch
phiases of the moment foi theii political oi liteiaiy convenience and changing
sides when it suited them.
1!
Chuichill Extols lascismo foi ltaly Ne+ Yor| T:es, Januaiy z1, 1vz.
Chuichills piaise of Mussolini continued foi anothei decade, even afei the
biutal ltalian conquest of Ethiopia. ln 1v!, he wiote of the amazing qualities
of couiage, compiehension, self-contol and peiseivence which he exemplies.
Nicholson Bakei, Hvon So|e. Te Beg:nn:ngs o[ Vor|J Vor II, onJ |e FnJ o[
RETHlNKlNG CHURCHlLL
Yet the time came when Chuichill made his peace with Commu-
nism. ln 1v.1, he gave unconditional suppoit to Stalin, welcomed
him as an ally, embiaced him as a fiiend. Chuichill, as well as
Roosevelt, used the aectionate nickname, Uncle Joe, as late as
the Potsdam confeience, he iepeatedly announced, of Stalin l like
that man.
1.
ln suppiessing the evidence that the Polish oceis at
Katyn had been muideied by the Soviets, he iemaiked Teie is no
use piowling iound the thiee yeai old giaves of Smolensk.
1
Ob-
sessed not only with defeating Hitlei, but with destioying Geimany,
Chuichill was oblivious to the dangei of a Soviet inundation of Eu-
iope until it was fai too late. Te symbolic climax of his infatuation
came at the Novembei, 1v.!, Tehian confeience, when Chuichill
piesented Stalin with a Ciusadeis swoid.
1e
Tose conceined to
dene the woid obscenity may wish to pondei that episode.
linally, theie was what appeaied to be the abiding love of his
life the Biitish Empiie. lf Chuichill stood [or on,|:ng o o||, it
was the Empiie, he famously said that he had not become Piime
Ministei in oidei to pieside ovei its liquidation. But that, of couise,
is piecisely what he did, selling out the Empiie and eveiything else
foi the sake of total victoiy ovei Geimany.
Besides his oppoitunism, Chuichill was noted foi his iemaik-
able ihetoiical skill. Tis talent helped him wield powei ovei men,
but it pointed to a fateful failing as well. Tioughout his life, many
who obseived Chuichill closely noted a peculiai tiait. ln 1v1, Loid
Eshei desciibed it in this way
He handles gieat subjects in ihythmical language, and becomes
quickly enslaved to his own phiases. He deceives himself into
C:+:|::o:on (New Yoik Simon & Schustei, zccc), p. !. Chuichill even had admii-
ing woids foi Hitlei, as late as 1v!, he wiote one may dislike Hitleis system
and yet admiie his patiiotic achievement. lf oui countiy weie defeated, l hope
we should nd a champion as indomitable to iestoie oui couiage and lead us back
to oui place among the nations. James, Chuichill the Politician, p. 11c. On the
conditions of the lascist takeovei in ltaly, see Ralph Raico, Mises on lascism and
Demociacy, }ovrno| o[ L:|eror:on SvJ:es, vol. 1z, no. 1 (Spiing 1vve), pp. 1z.
1.
Robin Edmonds, Chuichill and Stalin, in C|vrd:||, Blake and Louis, eds.,
p. !ze.
1
Noiman Rose, C|vrd:|| Te Unrv|, G:on (New Yoik liee Piess, 1vv.),
p. !c.
1e
J. l. C. lullei, Te SeconJ Vor|J Vor 1^I^o ASroeg:co| onJ Toc:co| H:sor,
(London Eyie and Spouiswoode, 1v.), p. z1c.
c GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
the belief that he takes bioad views, when his mind is xed
upon one compaiatively small aspect of the question.
1
Duiing Woild Wai ll, Robeit Menzies, Piime Ministei of Austialia,
said of Chuichill His ieal tyiant is the gliueiing phiaseso auiac-
tive to his mind that awkwaid facts have to give way.
1c
Anothei
associate wiote He is . . . the slave of the woids which his mind
foims about ideas. . . . And he can convince himself of almost eveiy
tiuth if it is once allowed thus to stait on its wild caieei thiough his
ihetoiical machineiy.
1v
But while Winston had no piinciples, theie +os one constant in
his life the love of wai. lt began eaily. As a child, he had a huge
collection of toy soldieis, 1cc of them, and he played with them
foi many yeais afei most boys tuin to othei things. Tey weie
all Biitish, he tells us, and he fought baules with his biothei Jack,
who was only allowed to have coloied tioops, and they weie not
allowed to have aitilleiy.
zc
He auended Sandhuist, the militaiy
academy, instead of the univeisities, and fiom the moment that
Chuichill lef Sandhuist . . . he did his utmost to get into a ght,
wheievei a wai was going on.
z1
All his life he was most excited
on the evidence, only ieally excitedby wai. He loved wai as few
modein men evei have
zz
he even loved the bangs, as he called
them, and he was veiy biave undei ie.
z!
1
James, Chuichill the Politician, p. v. Te same quotation fiomEshei is cited
and endoised by Basil Liddell Hait, Te Militaiy Stiategist, in A. J. P. Tayloi,
et al., C|vrd:|| Re+:seJ, p. zz1.
1c
David living, C|vrd:||s Vor, vol. 1, Te Srvgg|e [or Po+er (Bullsbiook, West-
ein Austialia Veiitas, 1vc), p. 1.
1v
Chailes Masteiman, cited in James, Chuichill the Politician, p. 1.
zc
Hait, Te Militaiy Stiategist, pp. 1!..
z1
lbid., p. 1..
zz
Chuichill told Asquiths daughtei in 1v1 l know this wai is smashing and
shaueiing the lives of thousands eveiy momentand yetl cannot help itl
love eveiy second l live. Michael Howaid, Chuichill and the liist Woild Wai,
in C|vrd:||, Blake and Louis, eds., p. 1zv.
z!
ln his last yeais, duiing the Cold Wai, Chuichill made a feeble auempt to
eect a ieconciliation between Russia and the Westein poweis. Te solution to
this puzzling about face lies in the fact that now Chuichill was genuinely scaied.
By then the Soviet Union possessed nucleai weapons, and it was ieckoned that it
would take no moie than seven oi eight H-bombs to ieduce that iealm of kings,
that scepteid isle to a heap of ashes.
RETHlNKlNG CHURCHlLL v
ln 1vz, Chuichill wiote Te stoiy of the human iace is wai.
z.
Tis, howevei, is untiue, potentially, it is disastiously untiue.
Chuichill lacked any giasp of the fundamentals of the social phi-
losophy of classical libeialism. ln paiticulai, he nevei undeistood
that, as Ludwig von Mises explained, the tiue stoiy of the human
iace is the extension of social coopeiation and the division of laboi.
Peace, not wai, is the fathei of all things.
z
loi Chuichill, the yeais
without wai oeied nothing to him but the bland skies of peace
and platitude. Tis was a man, as we shall see, who wished foi
moie wais than ocvo||, |oeneJ.
When he was posted to lndia and began to iead avidly to make
up foi lost time, Chuichill was piofoundly impiessed by Daiwinism.
He lost whatevei ieligious faith he may have hadthiough ieading
Gibbon, he saidand took a paiticulai dislike, foi some ieason, to
the Catholic Chuich, as well as Chiistian missions. He became,
in his own woids, a mateiialistto the tips of my ngeis, and
he feivently upheld the woildview that human life is a stiuggle
foi existence, with the outcome the suivival of the uest.
ze
Tis
philosophy of life and histoiy Chuichill expiessed in his one novel,
So+ro|o.
z
Tat Chuichill was a iacist goes without saying, yet his
iacism went deepei than with most of his contempoiaiies.
zc
lt is
cuiious how, with his staik Daiwinian outlook, his elevation of wai
to the cential place in human histoiy, and his iacism, as well as his
xation on gieat leadeis, Chuichills woildview iesembled that of
his antagonist, Hitlei.
zv
z.
Mauiice Ashley, C|vrd:|| os H:sor:on (New Yoik Sciibneis, 1vec), p. zzc.
z
Ludwig von Mises, L:|ero|:s A Soc:oFcono:c F:os::on, Ralph Raico,
tians. (Kansas City Sheed Andiews and McMeel, [1vz] 1vc), pp. z!z.
ze
Ponting, C|vrd:||, p. z!, Dietiich Aignei, V:nson C|vrd:|| Rv| vnJ Leg
enJe (Guingen Musteischmidt, 1v), p. !1.
z
lbid., pp. .c...
zc
Andiew Robeits, F:nen C|vrd:||:ons (New Yoik Simon and Schustei,
1vv.), pp. z111. Robeits nds it iionic that, given Chuichills views on iace, it
was he of all Piime Ministeis [who] allowed Biitain to stait to become a multi-
iacial society thiough Commonwealth immigiation duiing his last lndian Sum-
mei administiation, 1v1.
zv
Tat Chuichills iacism could be lethal is demonstiated in the iecent book
by the histoiian Madhusiee Mukeijee, C|vrd:||s Secre Vor Te Br::s| F:re
onJ |e Ro+:s|:ng o[ InJ:o Jvr:ng Vor|J Vor II (New Yoik Basic Books, zc1c).
Duiing the 1v.! famine in Bengal, Chuichill iefused to supply the Bengalis with
ec GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
When Chuichill was not actually engaged in wai, he was ie-
poiting on it. He eaily made a ieputation foi himself as a wai
coiiespondent, in Kitcheneis campaign in the Sudan and in the
Boei Wai. ln Decembei, 1vcc, a dinnei was given at the Waldoif-
Astoiia in honoi of the young jouinalist, iecently ietuined fiom his
well-publicized adventuies in South Afiica. Maik Twain, who intio-
duced him, had alieady, it seems, caught on to Chuichill. ln a biief
satiiical speech, Twain slyly intimated that, with his English fathei
and Ameiican mothei, Chuichill was the peifect iepiesentative of
Anglo-Ameiican cant.
!c
CuUvcuiii ~Nu 1ui Niv Liniv~iis:
ln 1vcc Chuichill began the caieei he was evidently fated foi. His
backgioundthe giandson of a duke and son of a famous Toiy
politiciangot him into the House of Commons as a Conseivative.
At ist he seemed to be distinguished only by his iestless ambition,
iemaikable even in pailiamentaiy ianks. But in 1vc., he ciossed
the ooi to the Libeials, supposedly on account of his fiee-tiade
convictions. Howevei, Robeit Rhodes James, one of Chuichills
admiieis, wiote lt was believed [at the time], piobably iightly,
that if Aithui Balfoui had given him oce in 1vcz, Chuichill would
not have developed such a buining inteiest in fiee tiade and joined
the Libeials. Clive Ponting notes that as he had alieady admiued
to Rosebeiy, he was looking foi an excuse to defect fioma paity that
seemed ieluctant to iecognise his talents, and the Libeials would
not accept a piotectionist.
!1
food, instead shipping wheat fiom Austialia to ltaly and England, countiies not
sueiing fiom staivation. He even iefused an Ameiican oei to send food to
Bengal in Ameiican ships. Chuichill viewed the Bengalis, and lndians in geneial,
as less than fully human, an opinion shaied by his scientic advisoi, Piofessoi
Lindemann, who advanced eugenic and Malthusian ieasons foi the policy.
Piobably 1. to z million oi moie Bengalis died in the waitime famine.
!c
Maik Twain, Mor| T+o:ns Veoons o[ So:re An:Ier:o|:s Vr::ngs on
|e P|:|::neAer:con Vor, Jim Zwick, ed. (Syiacuse, N.Y. Syiacuse Univeisity
Piess, 1vvz), pp. v11.
!1
Robeit Rhodes James, Chuichill the Pailiamentaiian, Oiatoi, and States-
man, in C|vrd:||, Blake and Louis, eds., p. 1c, Ponting, C|vrd:||, p. .v.
RETHlNKlNG CHURCHlLL e1
Tossed by the tides of faddish opinion,
!z
with no piinciples of
his own and hungiy foi powei, Chuichill soon became an adheient
of the New Libeialism, an updated veision of his fatheis Toiy
Demociacy. Te new libeialism dieied fiom the old only in the
small mauei of substituting incessant state activism foi laissez-faiie.
Although his conseivative idolateis seem blithely unawaie of
the factfoi them it is always 1v.cChuichill was one of the chief
pioneeis of the welfaie state in Biitain. Te modein welfaie state,
successoi to the welfaie state of eighteenth-centuiy absolutism, be-
gan in the 1cccs in Geimany, undei Bismaick.
!!
ln England, the
legislative tuining point came when Asquith succeeded Campbell-
Banneiman as Piime Ministei in 1vcc, his ieoiganized cabinet in-
cluded David Lloyd Geoige at the Exchequei and Chuichill at the
Boaid of Tiade.
Of couise, the electoial dimension of social policy was well to
the foie in Chuichills thinking, wiites a sympathetic histoiian
meaning that Chuichill undeistood it as the way to win votes.
!.
He
wiote to a fiiend
No legislation at piesent in view inteiests the demociacy.
All theii minds aie tuining moie and moie to the social
and economic issue. Tis ievolution is iiiesistible. Tey
will not toleiate the existing system by which wealth is
acquiied, shaied and employed. . . . Tey will set theii faces
like int against the money poweiheii of all othei poweis
and tyiannies oveithiownand its obvious injustices. And
this theoietical iepulsion will ultimately extend to any paity
associated in maintaining the status quo. . . . Minimum stan-
daids of wages and comfoit, insuiance in some eective foim
oi othei against sickness, unemployment, old age, these aie
the questions and the only questions by which paities aie
going to live in the futuie. Woe to Libeialism, if they slip
thiough its ngeis.
!
!z
Chuichill at this time even spoke out in favoi of state-enfoiced tempeiance,
an amusing bit of hypociisy in a man whose lifelong love of diink was legendaiy.
!!
On the histoiy of the Geiman welfaie state, absolutist and modein, see
Geid Habeimann, Der Vo||[o|rssoo Gesd:de e:nes Irr+egs (Beilin Piopy-
len, 1vv.).
!.
Addison, Chuichill and Social Refoim, p. ec.
!
Addison, C|vrd:|| on |e Hoe Fron, 1^hh1^, p. v.
ez GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
Chuichill had alieady announced his conveision to a collec-
tivist social policy befoie his move to the Boaid of Tiade.
!e
His
constant theme became the just piecedence of public ovei piivate
inteiests. He took up the fashionable social-engineeiing clichs of
the time, asseiting that Science, physical and political alike, ievolts
at the disoiganisation which glaies at us in so many aspects of
modein life, and that the nation demands the application of diastic
coiiective and cuiative piocesses. Te state was to acquiie canals
and iailioads, develop ceitain national industiies, piovide vastly
augmented education, intioduce the eight-houi woik day, levy pio-
giessive taxes, and guaiantee a national minimum living standaid.
lt is no wondei that Beatiice Webb noted that Winston was de-
nitely casting in his lot with the constiuctive state action.
!
lollowing a visit to Geimany, Lloyd Geoige and Chuichill
weie both conveited to the Bismaickian model of social insuiance
schemes.
!c
As Chuichill told his constituents My heait was lled
with admiiation of the patient genius which had added these social
bulwaiks to the many gloiies of the Geiman iace.
!v
He set out, in
his woids, to thiust a big slice of Bismaickianism ovei the whole
undeiside of oui industiial system.
.c
ln 1vcc, Chuichill announced
in a speech in Dundee l am on the side of those who think that a
gieatei collective sentiment should be intioduced into the State and
the municipalities. l should like to see the State undeitaking new
functions. Still, individualism must be iespected No man can be
a collectivist alone oi an individualist alone. He must be both an
individualist and a collectivist. Te natuie of man is a dual natuie.
Te chaiactei of the oiganisation of human society is dual.
.1
Tis,
by the way, is a good sample of Chuichill as political philosophei
!e
lbid, p. 1.
!
W. H. Gieenleaf, Te Br::s| Po|::co| TroJ::on, vol. z, Te IJeo|og:co| Her:oge
(London Methuen, 1vc!), pp. 11..
!c
E. P. Hennock, Br::s| Soc:o| Re[or onJ Geron PreceJens Te Cose o[
Soc:o| Insvronce 188h1^1o (Oxfoid Claiendon, 1vc), pp. 1ecev.
!v
Goidon A. Ciaig, Chuichill and Geimany, in C|vrd:||, Blake and Louis,
eds., p. z..
.c
E. P. Hennock, Te Oiigins of Biitish National lnsuiance and the Geiman
Piecedent 1ccc1v1., in Te Fergence o[ |e Ve|[ore Soe :n Br:o:n onJ Geron,,
W. J. Mommsen and Wolfgang Mock, eds. (London Cioom Helm, 1vc1), p. cc.
.1
Winston Chuichill, Co|ee Seedes 18^1^oI, vol. 1, 18^1^h8, Robeit
Rhodes James, ed. (New Yoik Chelsea House, 1v.), pp. 1czv!c, 1c!z.
RETHlNKlNG CHURCHlLL e!
it nevei gets much beuei.
But while both collective oiganisation and individual incen-
tive must be given theii due, Chuichill was ceitain which had
gained the uppei hand
Te whole tendency of civilisation is, howevei, towaids the
multiplication of the collective functions of society. Te evei-
giowing complications of civilisation cieate foi us new sei-
vices which have to be undeitaken by the State, and cieate
foi us an expansion of existing seivices. . . . Teie is a pieuy
steady deteimination . . . to inteicept all futuie uneained in-
ciement which may aiise fiomthe inciease in the speculative
value of the land. Teie will be an evei-widening aiea of
municipal enteipiise.
Te statist tiend met with Chuichills complete appioval. As he
added
l go faithei, l should like to see the State embaik on vaiious
novel and adventuious expeiiments. . . . l am veiy soiiy we
have not got the iailways of this countiy in oui hands. We
may do something beuei with the canals.
.z
Tis giandson of a duke and gloiiei of his ancestoi, the aich-
coiiuptionist Mailboiough, was not above pandeiing to lowei-class
iesentments. Chuichill claimed that the cause of the Libeial Paity
is the cause of the lef-out millions, while he auacked the Consei-
vatives as the Paity of the iich against the pooi, the classes and
theii dependents against the masses, of the lucky, the wealthy, the
happy, and the stiong, against the lef-out and the shut-out millions
of the weak and pooi.
.!
Chuichill became the peifect hustling political entiepieneui, ea-
gei to politicize one aiea of social life afei the othei. He beiated the
Conseivatives foi lacking even a single plan of social iefoim oi ie-
constiuction, while boasting that he and his associates intended to
piopose a wide, compiehensive, inteidependent scheme of social
oiganisation, incoipoiated in a massive seiies of legislative pio-
posals and administiative acts.
..
.z
Winston Chuichill, L:|ero|:s onJ |e Soc:o| Pro||e (London Hoddei and
Stoughton, 1vcv), pp. ccc1.
.!
lbid., pp. c, zze.
..
lbid., p. zz.
e. GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
At this time, Chuichill fell undei the inuence of Beatiice and
Sidney Webb, the leadeis of the labian Society. At one of hei fa-
mous stiategic dinnei paities, Beatiice Webb intioduced Chuichill
to a young piotg, Williamlatei LoidBeveiidge. Chuichill
biought Beveiidge into the Boaid of Tiade as his advisoi on social
questions, thus staiting him on his illustiious caieei.
.
Besides
pushing foi a vaiiety of social insuiance schemes, Chuichill cieated
the system of national laboi exchanges he wiote to Piime Ministei
Asquith of the need to spiead . . . a soit of Geimanized netwoik of
state inteivention and iegulation ovei the Biitish laboi maiket.
.e
But Chuichill enteitained much moie ambitious goals foi the Boaid
of Tiade. He pioposed a plan wheieby
Te Boaid of Tiade was to act as the intelligence depait-
ment of the Goveinment, foiecasting tiade and employment
in the iegions so that the Goveinment could allocate con-
tiacts to the most deseiving aieas. At the summit . . . would
be a Commiuee of National Oiganisation, chaiied by the
Chancelloi of the Exchequei to supeivise the economy.
.
linally, well awaie of the electoial potential of oiganized laboi,
Chuichill became a champion of the laboi unions. He was a leading
suppoitei, foi instance, of the Tiades Disputes Act of 1vce.
.c
Tis
Act ieveised the Ta Vale and othei judicial decisions, which had
held unions iesponsible foi toits and wiongs commiued on theii
behalf by theii agents. Te Act outiaged the gieat libeial legal
histoiian and theoiist of the iule of law, A. V. Dicey, who chaiged
that it
confeis upon a tiade union a fieedom fiom civil liability foi
the commission of even the most heinous wiong by the union
oi its seivants, and in shoit confeis upon eveiy tiade union
a piivilege and piotection not possessed by any othei pei-
son oi body of peisons, whethei coipoiate oi unincoipoiate,
thioughout the United Kingdom. . . . lt makes a tiade union a
piivileged body exempted fiom the oidinaiy law of the land.
.
Hennock, Br::s| Soc:o| Re[or, pp. 1ec.
.e
lbid., p. 1e1.
.
Ponting, C|vrd:||, p. c!.
.c
See, foi instance, Chuichill, L:|ero|:s onJ |e Soc:o| Pro||e, pp. ..
RETHlNKlNG CHURCHlLL e
No such piivileged body has evei befoie been delibeiately
cieated by an English Pailiament.
.v
lt is iionic that the immense powei of the Biitish laboi unions,
the |e no:re of Maigaiet Tatchei, was biought into being with
the enthusiastic help of hei gieat heio, Winston Chuichill.
Woviu W~v l
ln 1v11, Chuichill became liist Loid of the Admiialty and now was
tiuly in his element. Natuially, he quickly allied himself with the
wai paity, and, duiing the ciises that followed, fanned the ames of
wai. When the nal ciisis came, in the summei of 1v1., Chuichill
was the only membei of the cabinet who backed wai fiom the stait,
with all of his accustomed eneigy. Asquith, his own Piime Ministei,
wiote of him Winston veiy bellicose and demanding immediate
mobilization. . . . Winston, who has got all his wai paint on, is long-
ing foi a sea ght in the eaily houis of the moining to iesult in the
sinking of the [Geiman waiship] Goe|en. Te whole thing lls me
with sadness.
c
On July z, a week befoie the Geiman invasion of Belgium, he
mobilized the Biitish Home lleet, the gieatest assemblage of naval
powei in the histoiy of the woild to that time. As Sidney lay wiote,
Chuichill oideied that
Te eet was to pioceed duiing the night at high speed and
without lights thiough the Stiaits of Dovei fiom Poitland to
its ghting base at Scapa llow. leaiing to biing this oidei
befoie the Cabinet, lest it should be consideied a piovocative
action likely to damage the chances of peace, Mi. Chuichill
had only infoimed Mi. Asquith, who at once gave his ap-
pioval.
1
No wondei that, when wai with Geimany bioke out, Chuichill, in
.v
A. V. Dicey, Lecvres on |e Re|o:on Be+een Lo+ onJ Pv||:c O:n:on :n Fng
|onJ Jvr:ng |e N:neeen| Cenvr,, znd ed. (London Macmillan, [1v1.] 1ve!),
pp. xlvxlvi.
c
Heibeit Heniy Asquith, Meor:es onJ Reec:ons 18.1^. (London Cas-
sell, 1vzc), vol. z, pp. , z1.
1
Sidney lay, Or:g:ns o[ |e Vor|J Vor, znd iev. ed. (New Yoik liee Piess,
[1v!c] 1vee), p. .v.
ee GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
contiast even to the othei chiefs of the wai paity, was all smiles,
lled with a glowing zest.
z
liom the outset of hostilities, Chuichill, as head of the Ad-
miialty, was instiumental in establishing the hungei blockade of
Geimany. Tis was piobably the most eective weapon employed
on eithei side in the whole conict. Te only pioblem was that,
accoiding to eveiyones inteipietation of inteinational law except
Biitains, it was illegal. Te blockade was not close-in, but de-
pended on scaueiing mines, and many of the goods deemed contia-
bandfoi instance, food foi civilianshad nevei been so classied
befoie.
!
But, thioughout his caieei, inteinational law and the con-
ventions by which men have tiied to limit the hoiiois of wai meant
nothing to Chuichill. As a Geiman histoiian has diyly commented,
Chuichill was ieady to bieak the iules whenevei the veiy existence
of his countiy was at stake, and foi him this was veiy ofen the
case.
.
Te hungei blockade had some iathei unpleasant consequences.
ln Woild Wai ll Aithui (Bombei) Haiiis defended the massacie fiomthe aii
of Geiman civilians he diiected by invoking the hungei blockade of the Gieat Wai.
Qoted in A. C. Giayling, Aong |e DeoJ C::es Te H:sor, onJ Moro| Legoc, o[
|e VVII Bo|:ng o[ C:+:|:ons :n Geron, onJ }oon (New Yoik Walkei, zcce),
p. z..
e
Vincent, Po|::cs o[ Hvnger, p. 1ez. loi fuithei details on the point see the
ieview of Vincents book in the piesent volume.
Waltei Lalebei, Aer:co, Rvss:o, onJ |e Co|J Vor, 1^o1^^h, eth iev. ed.
(New Yoik McGiaw-Hill, 1vv1), p. 1!. Cf. Stalins comment at Yalta A fieely
elected goveinment in any of these countiies would be anti-Soviet, and that we
cannot allow. Hans J. Moigenthau, Te Oiigins of the Cold Wai, in Lloyd C.
Gaidnei, Aithui Schlesingei, Ji., and Hans J. Moigenthau, Te Or:g:ns o[ |e Co|J
Vor (Waltham, Mass. Ginn, 1vc), pp. ccc.
e
Melvyn R. Leei, lnside Enemy Aichives Te Cold Wai Reopened, Fore:gn
Ao:rs (July/August 1vve), pp. 1!.!.
1ce GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
leadeis in Washington, who at the same time had no qualms about
maintaining theii own spheie of inuence thioughout all of Latin
Ameiica.
At the State Depaitment, Heniy Stimson and John J. McCloy agieed in May
1v. that (in McCloys woids) we ought to have oui cake and eat it too, that is,
contiol South Ameiica and at the same time inteivene piomptly in Euiope, we
oughtnt to give away eithei asset [sic]. Stephen E. Ambiose, R:se o G|o|o|:s
Aer:con Fore:gn Po|:c, S:nce 1^I8, !id iev. ed. (New Yoik Penguin, 1vc!), p. 1c!.
c
Alonzo L. Hamby, Mon o[ |e Peo|e A L:[e o[ Horr, S. Trvon (New Yoik
Oxfoid Univeisity Piess, 1vv), p. !v1.
v
liank Kofsky, Horr, S. Trvon onJ |e Vor Score o[ 1^o8 A Svccess[v|
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1c
Given all this, howwould Tiuman be able to justify U.S. involve-
ment` Uiged on by haidlineis like Navy Secietaiy James loiiestal,
who weie emboldened by the (tempoiaiy) Ameiican monopoly of
the atom bomb, he decided to fiame the Communist upiising in
Gieece, as well as Soviet moves in lian and Tuikey, in apocalyptic
teims. ln counteiing them, he mused We might as well nd out
whethei the Russians aie as bent on woild conquest now as in ve
oi ten yeais.
1c
Woild conquest. Now, it seems, it was a Red Hitlei
who was on the maich.
11
Still, afei the landslide Republican victoiy in the congiessional
elections of 1v.e, Tiuman had to deal with a potentially iecalcitiant
opposition. Te Republicans had piomised to ietuin the countiy
to some degiee of noimalcy afei the statist binge of the wai yeais.
Shaip cuts in taxes, abolition of waitime contiols, and a balanced
budget weie high piioiities.
But Tiuman could count on allies in the inteinationalist wing
of the Republican Paity, most piominently Aithui Vandenbeig, a
foimei isolationist tuined iabid globalist, now chaiiman of the
Senate loieign Relations Commiuee. When Tiuman ievealed his
new doctiine to Vandenbeig, the Republican leadei advised him
that, in oidei to get such a piogiam thiough, the Piesident would
have to scaie hell out of the Ameiican people.
1z
Tat Tiuman
pioceeded to do.
On Maich 1z, 1v., in a speech befoie a joint session of Congiess,
Tiuman pioclaimed a ievolution in Ameiican foieign policy. Moie
impoitant than the pioposed s!cc million in aid foi Gieece and
s1cc million foi Tuikey was the vision he piesented. Declaiing that
hencefoith it must be the policy of the United States to suppoit
fiee peoples who aie iesisting auempted subjugation by aimed
Coo:gn o Dece:+e |e No:on (New Yoik St. Maitins Piess, 1vv!), pp. z....
1c
Ambiose, R:se o G|o|o|:s, p. 11.
11
ln theii auacks on Patiick Buchanans A Rev||:c, No on F:re Rec|o:
:ng Aer:cos Des:n, (Washington, D.C. Regneiy, 1vvv) foi his insistence that
Nazi Geimany posed no thieat to the United States afei 1v.c, Buchanans ciitics
have geneially iesoited to fatuous smeais. Tis is undeistandable, since they aie
wedded to a fantasy of Hitleiian powei that, iionically, is itself a ieection of Hit-
leiian piopaganda. Te fact is that Nazi Geimany nevei conqueied any militaiily
impoitant nation but liance. Te dangei of cc million Geimans conqueiing the
woild is a scaieciow that has, obviously, seived the globalists well.
1z
Ambiose, R:se o G|o|o|:s, pp. 1!z!!.
1cc GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
minoiities oi by outside piessuie, Tiuman situated aid to Gieece
and Tuikey within a woild-encompassing, life-oi-death stiuggle
between alteinative ways of life.
1!
As one histoiian has wiiuen, he
escalated the long, histoiic stiuggle between the Lef and
Right in Gieece foi political powei, and the equally histoiic
Russian uige foi contiol of the Daidanelles [sic], into a uni-
veisal conict between fieedom and slaveiy. lt was a veiy
bioad jump indeed.
1.
At ist, Tiumans iadical initiative piovoked uneasiness, even
within his administiation. Geoige Kennan, ofen ciedited with fa-
theiing the Cold Wai containment idea, stiongly opposed mili-
taiy aid to Tuikey, a nation which was undei no militaiy thieat
and which boideied the Soviet Union. Kennan also scoed at the
giandiose and sweeping chaiactei of the Tiuman Doctiine.
1
ln
Congiess, the iesponse of Senatoi Robeit Taf was to accuse the
Piesident of dividing the woild into Communist and anti-Communist
zones. He asked foi evidence that oui national secuiity was in-
volved in Gieece, adding that he did not want wai with Russia.
1e
But Taf tuined out to be the last, sometimes vacillating, leadei of
the Old Right, whose ianks weie visibly weakening.
1
Although
he was called Mi. Republican, it was the inteinationalists who
weie now in chaige of that paity. ln the Senate, Tafs doubts weie
answeied with calm, well-ieasoned iebuuals. Vandenbeig intoned
1!
Ronald E. Powaski, Te Co|J Vor Te Un:eJ Soes onJ |e So+:e Un:on,
1^11^^1 (New Yoik Oxfoid Univeisity Piess, 1vvc), p. z.
1.
Ambiose, R:se o G|o|o|:s, p. 1!!. Tat self-inteiest played a iole in the
exaggeiation of the ciisis is the conclusion of Ronald Steel, Te End of the
Beginning, D:|oo:c H:sor, 1e, no. z (Spiing 1vvz), p. zv, who wiites that
univeisalizing the stiuggle would enable the United States gieatly to expand
its militaiy and political ieach, which enhanced its appeal to Ameiican foieign
policy elites eagei to embiace the nations new oppoitunities.
1
Lalebei, Aer:co, Rvss:o, onJ |e Co|J Vor, pp. !..
1e
Ronald Radosh, Pro|es on |e R:g| Pro|es o[ Conser+o:+e Cr::cs o[ Aer
:con G|o|o|:s (New Yoik Simon and Schustei, 1v), pp. 1e.
1
See Ted Galen Caipenteis scholaily and highly infoimative Te D:sseners
Aer:con Iso|o:on:ss onJ Fore:gn Po|:c,, 1^o1^o (Ph.D. disseitation, Univeisity
of Texas, 1vcc). On the same topic, but concentiating on the intellectual leadeis
of the Old Right, see Joseph R. Stiombeigs peiceptive analysis, Te Co|J Vor onJ
|e Trons[oro:on o[ |e Aer:con R:g| Te Dec|:ne o[ R:g|V:ng L:|ero|:s
(M.A. thesis, lloiida Atlantic Univeisity, 1v1).
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1cv
lf we deseit the Piesident of the United States at [this] moment we
cease to have any inuence in the woild foievei. Massachuseus
Senatoi Heniy Cabot Lodge, Ji., aveiied that iepudiating Tiuman
would be like thiowing the Ameiican ag on the giound and stomp-
ing on it.
1c
ln May, Congiess appiopiiated the funds the piesident
iequested.
Meanwhile, the oigans of the national secuiity state weie being
put into place.
1v
Te Wai and Navy Depaitments and the Aimy Aii
Coips weie combined into what was named, in Oiwellian fashion,
the Defense Depaitment. Othei legislation established the National
Secuiity Council and upgiaded intelligence opeiations into the Cen-
tial lntelligence Agency.
ln the following decades, the ClA was to play a sinistei, ex-
tiemely expensive, and ofen comically inept ioleespecially in
its continually absuid oveiestimations of Soviet stiength.
zc
ln es-
tablishing the ClA, Congiess had no intention of authoiizing it to
conduct seciet militaiy opeiations, but undei Tiuman this is what it
quickly began to do, including waging a seciet wai on the Chinese
mainland even befoie the outbieak of the Koiean Wai (with no
appieciable iesults).
z1
ln 1vvv, afei it taigeted the Chinese em-
bassy in Belgiade foi bombingsupposedly a mistake, even though
1c
Melvyn P. Leei, A PreonJeronce o[ Po+er No:ono| Secvr:,, |e Trvon
AJ:n:sro:on, onJ |e Co|J Vor (Stanfoid, Calif. Stanfoid Univeisity Piess,
1vvz), p. 1.e.
1v
See Michael J. Hogan, A Cross o[ Iron Horr, S. Trvon onJ |e Or:g:ns o[ |e
No:ono| Secvr:, Soe, 1^o1^o (Cambiidge Cambiidge Univeisity Piess, 1vvc).
zc
Cf. Daniel Patiick Moynihan, Secrec, Te Aer:con F:er:ence (New Haven,
Conn. Yale Univeisity Piess, 1vv), pp. 1vvv and oss:. ln 1vv, foimei Piesi-
dent Geiald loid iecalled his days as a membei of the House Defense Appiopiia-
tions Commiuee, when spokesmen foi the ClA would wain ovei and ovei again
of the imminent dangei of the Soviet Unions suipassing the United States in
militaiy capability, in economic giowth, in the stiength of oui economies. lt was
a scaiy piesentation.
z1
Tiuman latei maintained that he nevei intended the ClA to involve itself
in peacetime cloak-and-daggei opeiations. Tis, howevei, was a lie. See John
Piados, Pres:Jens Secre Vors CIA onJ Penogon Co+er Oero:ons [ro Vor|J
Vor II |rovg| |e Pers:on Gv|[ Vor, iev. ed. (Chicago lvan R. Dee, 1vve), pp. zcz1,
zczv, ee, also Petei Giose, Oero:on Ro|||oJ Aer:cos Secre Vor Be|:nJ
|e Iron Cvro:n (Boston Houghton Miin, zccc), which discusses Geoige Ken-
nans 1v.c plan, appioved by the Tiuman administiation, to caiiy out paiamili-
taiy actions behind the lion Cuitain, including gueiiilla auacks and sabotage.
11c GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
Ameiican diplomats had dined at the embassy and its location was
known to eveiyone in the cityClAhas come to stand, in the woids
of one Biitish wiitei, foi Cant ldentify Anything.
zz
ln June 1v., Secietaiy of State Geoige Maishall announced a
wide-ianging scheme foi economic aid to Euiope. ln Decembei,
the Maishall Plan was piesented as an appiopiiations bill calling foi
giants of s1 billion ovei foui yeais. Te plan, it was claimed, would
ieconstiuct Euiope to the point wheie the Euiopeans could defend
themselves. Congiess at ist was cold to the idea. Taf giumbled
that Ameiican taxpayeis should not have to suppoit an inteina-
tional WPA, aiguing that the funds would subsidize the socializa-
tion piogiams undei way in many of the iecipient countiies.
z!
Te
Maishall Plan led to intensied tensions with the Russians, who saw
it as fuithei pioof that Washington aimed to undeimine theii iule
ovei Eastein Euiope. Stalin instiucted his satellite states to iefuse
to take pait.
z.
zz
Geoiey Wheatciof, in the T:es L:eror, Sv|een (July 1e, 1vvv), p. v.
loi an excellent analysis of the United States and NATOs successive lies on the
bombing of the Chinese embassy, and the Ameiican medias chaiacteiistic en-
doisement and piopagation of the lies, see Jaied lsiael, Te Aiiogance of Rome,
www.emperors-clothes.com, Apiil 1c, zccc.
z!
Radosh, Pro|es on |e R:g|, pp. 1ve1. Te Maishall Plan and its sup-
posed successes aie now enveloped by what Waltei A. McDougall, in Pro:seJ
LonJ, CrvsoJer Soe Te Aer:con Fncovner +:| |e Vor|J S:nce 1o (Boston
Houghton Miin, 1vv), p. 1cc, iightly calls a mythology. Te basic cause of
Euiopes iecoveiy was the ielatively fiee-maiket piinciples put into piactice (in
West Geimany, foi instance), and, moie than anything else, the chaiactei of the
Euiopean peoples, sometimes called human capital. What the Maishall Plan
and the billions in U.S. militaiy aid laigely accomplished was to allow the Euio-
pean iegimes to constiuct theii welfaie states, and, in the case of liance, foi one,
to continue tiying to suppiess colonial upiisings, as in Vietnam. Cf. Geoige C.
Heiiing, Aer:cos Longes Vor |e Un:eJ Soes onJ V:eno, 1^h1^o (New
Yoik Knopf, 1vv), p. c substantial Ameiican funds undei the Maishall Plan
enabled liance to use its own iesouices to piosecute the wai in lndochina. See
also Tylei Cowen, Te Maishall Plan Myths and Realities, in U.S. A:J o |e
De+e|o:ng Vor|J A Free Mor|e AgenJo, Doug Bandow, ed. (Washington, D.C.
Heiitage, 1vc), pp. e1., and Alan S. Milwaid, Was the Maishall Plan Nec-
essaiy` D:|oo:c H:sor, 1! (Spiing 1vcv), pp. z!1!, who emphasizes the
piessuies placed on Euiopean goveinments by the Plans administiatois to adopt
Keynesian policies.
z.
Vladislav Zubok, Stalins Plans and Russian Aichives, D:|oo:c H:sor,
z1, no. z (Spiing 1vv), p. zvv. Te Soviet documents showthat Stalin and Molotov
weie convinced that the U.S. aid was designed to luie the Kiemlins East Euio-
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 111
WoviuCoNUis1 Riu Aiiv1
Nineteen foity-eight was a decisive yeai in the Cold Wai. Teie was
gieat ieluctance in the conseivative Eightieth Congiess to comply
with Tiumans piogiam, which included funding foi the Euiopean
Recoveiy Act (Maishall Plan), iesumption of the diaf, and Uni-
veisal Militaiy Tiaining (UMT). To deal with this iesistance, the
administiation concocted the wai scaie of 1v.c.
Te ist pietext came in lebiuaiy, with the so-called Commu-
nist coup in Czechoslovakia. But Czechoslovakia, was, foi all in-
tents and puiposes, alieady a Soviet satellite. Having led the Czechs
in the ethnic cleansing of !. million Sudeten Geimans, the Com-
munists enjoyed gieat populaiity. ln the geneial elections, they
won !c pei cent of the vote, constituting by fai the laigest sin-
gle paity. Te Ameiican ambassadoi iepoited to Washington that
Communist consolidation of powei in eaily 1v.c was the logical
outgiowth of the CzechSoviet militaiy alliance dating back to 1v.!.
Geoige Maishall himself, Secietaiy of State at the time, stated in
piivate that as fai as inteinational aaiis aie conceined, the foi-
mal Communist assumption of powei made no dieience it would
meiely ciystallize and conim foi the futuie pievious Czech pol-
icy.
z
Still, the Communist coup was painted as a gieat leap
foiwaid in Stalins plan foi woild conquest.
Ten, on Maich , came the shocking leuei fiom Geneial Lu-
cius Clay, U.S. militaiy goveinoi in Geimany, to Geneial Stephen J.
Chambeilin, head of Aimy lntelligence, in which Clay ievealed his
foieboding that wai may come with diamatic suddenness. Yeais
latei, when Clays biogiaphei asked himwhy, if he sensed an impend-
ing wai, this was the only iefeience he evei made to it, he ieplied
Geneial Chambeilin . . . told me that the Aimy was hav-
ing tiouble geuing the diaf ieinstituted and they needed a
stiong message fiomme that they could use in congiessional
testimony. So l wiote this cable.
ze
On Maich 11, Maishall solemnly wained in a public addiess
that Te woild is in the midst of a gieat ciisis. Aveiell Haiiiman
asseited
pean neighbois out of its oibit and to iebuild Geiman stiength. See also Leei,
lnside Enemy Aichives, p. 1!!.
z
Kofsky, Trvon, p. vv.
ze
lbid., p. 1ce.
11z GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
Teie aie aggiessive foices in the woild coming fiom the
Soviet Union which aie just as destiuctive as Hitlei was, and
l think aie a gieatei menace than Hitlei was.
z
And so Haiiiman laid down the Hitlei caid, which was to become
the mastei tiump in the globalists piopaganda hand foi the next
half-centuiy and most likely foi many decades to come.
Taf, campaigning foi the Republican piesidential nomination,
was angeied by the wai hysteiia diummed up by the administiation
l know of no indication of Russian intention to undeitake
militaiy aggiession beyond the spheie of inuence that was
oiiginally assigned to them[at Yalta]. Te situation in Czecho-
slovakia was indeed a tiagic one, but Russian inuence has
piedominated theie since the end of the wai.
Taf tiied to intioduce a note of sanity lf Piesident Tiuman and
Geneial Maishall have any piivate intelligence iegaiding immi-
nent wai, they ought to tell the Ameiican people about it. Oth-
eiwise, we should pioceed on the basis of peace.
zc
ln ieality, the administiation had no such piivate intelligence,
hence the need to stage-manage Clays leuei. On the contiaiy,
Colonel Robeit B. Landiy, Tiumans aii aide, iepoited that in theii
zone in eastein Geimany the Russians had dismantled hundieds of
miles of iailioad tiack and shipped them homein othei woids,
they had toin up the veiy iailioad lines iequiied foi any Soviet at-
tack on westein Euiope.
zv
lield Maishal Montgomeiy, afei a tiip to
Russia in 1v., wiote to Geneial Eisenhowei Te Soviet Union is
veiy, veiy tiied. Devastation in Russia is appalling, and the countiy
is in no t state to go to wai.
!c
Today it would be veiy dicult to
nd any scholai anywheie willing to subsciibe to Tiumans fienzied
vision of a Soviet Union about to set o to conquei the woild. As
John Lewis Gaddis wiote
z
Ronald E. Powaski, To+orJ on Fnong|:ng A||:once Aer:con Iso|o:on:s,
Inerno:ono|:s, onJ Fvroe, 1^h11^h (Westpoit, Conn. Gieenwood, 1vv1),
pp. zc1cz.
zc
Haiiy W. Beigei, Senatoi Robeit A. Taf Dissents fiom Militaiy Escalation,
in Co|J Vor Cr::cs A|erno:+es o Aer:con Fore:gn Po|:c, :n |e Trvon Yeors,
Tomas G. Pateison, ed. (Chicago Qadiangle Books, 1v1), pp. 1c1cz, and Kof-
sky, Trvon, p. 1!c.
zv
lbid., pp. zv.v.
!c
Michael Paienti, Te S+orJ onJ |e Do||or Ier:o|:s, Re+o|v:on, onJ |e
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 11!
Stalin is nowseen as a cagey but insecuie oppoitunist, taking
advantage of such tactical oppoitunities as aiose to expand
Soviet inuence, but without any long-teim stiategy foi oi
even veiy much inteiest in piomoting the spiead of commu-
nism beyond the Soviet spheie.
!1
Te non-existence of Soviet plans to launch an auack on Euiope
holds foi the entiie Cold Wai peiiod. One scholai in the eld con-
cludes that
despite the fact that the Russian aichives have yielded ample
evidence of Soviet peidy and egiegious behavioi in many
othei spheies, nothing has tuined up to suppoit the idea that
the Soviet leadeiship at any time actually planned to stait
Woild Wai lll and send the Russian hoides westwaid.
!z
Ars Roce (New Yoik St. Maitins, 1vcv), p. 1..
!1
Gaddis, Te Emeiging Post-Revisionist Synthesis, p. 1c1. Hans Moigen-
thau, Te Oiigins of the Cold Wai, p. v, anticipated this conclusion Te
limits of Stalins teiiitoiial ambition weie the tiaditional limits of Russian ex-
pansionism. Even Vladislav Zubok, who believes that the now available Soviet
documents show the U.S. leadeis in a much beuei light than many had thought,
nonetheless concedes, Stalins Plans, p. !c theie was an element of oveiie-
action, aiiogance, and selsh piagmatism in the Ameiican iesponse to Stalins
plans. . . . Te Soviet militaiy machine was not a militaiy juggeinaut, westein Eu-
iope was not undei thieat of a diiect Soviet militaiy assault, and the Sino-Soviet
bloc lacked tiue cohesion. . . . Ameiican containment of Stalins Soviet Union may
indeed have helped the dictatoiship to mobilize people to the task of building a
supeipowei fiomthe ashes and iuins of the impoveiished and devastated countiy.
lt may even have helped Stalin to tiample on the seeds of libeialism and fieedom
in Soviet society. Cf. Leei, lnside Enemy Aichives, pp. 1!z, 1!. Te new
ieseaich cleaily shows that Ameiican initiatives intensied Soviet distiust and
ieinfoiced Soviet insecuiities . . . [iecent ieseaich indicates] that Ameiican poli-
cies made it dicult foi potential iefoimeis inside the Kiemlin to gain the high
giound.
!z
MauhewEvangelista, Te Soviet Tieat lntentions, Capabilities, and Con-
text, D:|oo:c H:sor, zz, no. ! (Summei 1vvc), pp. ...e. On howinfoimation
fiom iecently opened Soviet aichives has undeimined the old Cold Wai account,
see Leei, lnside Enemy Aichives, pp. 1zc!. Leei, haidly a New Lef (oi
libeitaiian) histoiian, concludes Ameiicans should ieexamine theii complacent
belief in the wisdom of theii countiys cold wai policies.
Te fact that Stalin was the woist tyiant and gieatest mass-muideiei in
twentieth-centuiy Euiopean histoiy has by nowbeen established beyond a doubt.
Howevei, heie one should heed Muiiay Rothbaids admonition against doing o
r:or: histoiy, that is, assuming that in a given inteinational conict it is always
11. GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
So why the wai scaie in 1v.c` ln a 1ve inteiview, looking back on
this peiiod, Aii loice Biigadiei Geneial Robeit C. Richaidson, who
seived at NATO headquaiteis in the eaily 1vcs, candidly admiued
theie was no question about it, that [Soviet] thieat that we
weie planning against was way oveiiated and intentionally
oveiiated, because theie was the pioblem of ieoiienting the
[U.S.] demobilization . . . [Washington] made this nine-foot-
tall thieat out theie. And foi yeais and yeais it stuck. l mean,
it was almost immovable.
!!
Yet, anyone who doubted the wisdom of the administiations mili-
taiistic policy was taigeted foi venomous smeais. Accoiding to Tiu-
man, Republicans who opposed his univeisal ciusade weie Kiem-
lin assets, the soit of tiaitois who would shoot oui soldieis in
the back in a hot wai,
!.
a good example of Tiumans acclaimed
the ielatively libeial state that is in the iight as against the ielatively illibeial state,
which must always be the aggiessoi. Muiiay N. Rothbaid, For o Ne+ L:|er, Te
L:|eror:on Mon:[eso, iev. ed. (New Yoik CollieiMacmillan, 1vc), pp. zcvv1.
!!
Evangelista, Te Soviet Tieat, p. ... See also Steel, Te End of the
Beginning, Unquestionably, the Soviet Union was fai weakei ideologically, po-
litically, stiuctuially, and, of couise, economically, than was geneially assumed.
An astonishing admission that the whole Cold Wai was fueled, on the Ameiican
side, by wild oveiestimations of Soviet stiength was made in 1vvc by Stiobe
Talbou, Deputy Secietaiy of State foi moie than foui decades, Westein policy
has been based on a giotesque exaggeiation of what the USSR could do if it
wanted, theiefoie what it might do, theiefoie what the West must be piepaied
to do in iesponse. . . . Woist-case assumptions about Soviet intentions have fed,
and fed upon, woist-case assumptions about Soviet capabilities. John A. Tomp-
son, Te Exaggeiation of Ameiican Vulneiability Te Anatomy of a Tiadition,
D:|oo:c H:sor, 1e, no. 1 (Wintei 1vvz), p. z!. Tompsons aiticle is highly
instiuctive on how hysteiia iegaiding impending auacks on the United States
duiing the twentieth centuiya time when Ameiica giew evei stiongeihas
contiibuted to entanglement in foieign conicts.
!.
Justus D. Doenecke, No o |e S+:] Te O|J Iso|o:on:ss :n |e Co|J Vor Fro
(Lewisbuig, Penn. Bucknell Univeisity Piess, 1vv), p. z1e. Tiumans slandeis
weie paiticulaily vile, since his own motivation in geneiating the wai-scaie was
at least in pait self-aggiandizement. As his tiusted political advisei Claik Clioid
noted in a memo to the Piesident Teie is consideiable political advantage to
the administiation in its baule with the Kiemlin. Te woise maueis get up to
a faiily ceitain pointieal dangei of imminent waithe moie is theie a sense
of ciisis. ln times of ciisis, the Ameiican citizen tends to back up his piesident.
(Kofsky, Trvon, p. vz)
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 11
plain speaking.
!
Aveiell Haiiiman chaiged that Taf was simply
helping Stalin caiiy out his aims. As always, the establishment
piess, led by the Ne+ Yor| T:es, echoed the goveinments slandeis.
Amusingly, Republican ciitics of the wai hysteiia weie labeled pio-
Soviet even by jouinals like Te Ne+Rev||:c and Te No:on, which
had functioned as apologists foi Stalins teiioi iegime foi yeais.
!e
Tiumans campaign could not have succeeded without the en-
thusiastic coopeiation of the Ameiican media. Led by the T:es,
the Hero|J Tr:|vne, and Heniy Luces magazines, the piess acted as
volunteei piopagandists foi the inteiventionist agenda, with all its
calculated deceptions. (Te piincipal exceptions weie the C|:cogo
Tr:|vne and the Vos|:ngon T:esHero|J, in the days of Colonel
McCoimick and Cissy Pateison.)
!
ln time, such subseivience in
foieign aaiis became ioutine foi the fouith estate, culminating
duiing and afei the 1vvv wai against Yugoslavia in iepoiting by the
piess coips that suipassed the mendacity of the Seibian Ministiy of
lnfoimation.
Oveiwhelmed by the piopaganda blitz fiom the administiation
and the piess, a Republican majoiity in Congiess heeded the Sec-
ietaiy of States high-minded call to keep foieign policy above
politics and voted full funding foi the Maishall Plan.
!c
!
Cf. Geoige Wills judgment, in Te Le+e|:ng V:nJ Po|::cs, |e Cv|vre, onJ
O|er Ne+s, 1^^h1^^o (New Yoik Viking, 1vv.), p. !cc Tiumans gieatness was
a pioduct of his goodness, his stiaight-ahead iespect foi the public, iespect ex-
piessed in decisions biiskly made and plainly explained. ln tiuth, despite Wills
ignoiant blathei, Tiuman was all of his life a demagogue, a political gaibage-
mouth, whose ist instinct was to besmiich his opponents. ln his tiibute to Tiu-
man, Will employs his usual ploy whenevei he is moved to extol some villainous
politico oi othei his subjects gieatness could only be denied by pitiful post-
modeinist cieatuies who ieject all human excellence, nobility of soul, etc. Tis
maneuvei is nowheie silliei than in the case of Haiiy Tiuman.
!e
Doenecke, No o |e S+:], pp. zcc, z1e.
!
Ted Galen Caipentei, Te Co:+e Press Fore:gn Po|:c, Cr:ses onJ |e F:rs
AenJen (Washington, D.C. Cato lnstitute, 1vv), pp. .z. Caipenteis ex-
cellent study coveis the whole peiiod of the Cold Wai.
!c
Te commotion ovei Soviet plans to conquei the woild intensied in June
1v.c with the blockade of West Beilin. Te United States and its allies had uni-
lateially decided to jeuison foui-powei contiol of Geimany and instead to inte-
giate theii occupation zones and pioceed to cieate a West Geiman state. Stalins
clumsy iesponse was to exploit the absence of any foimal agieement peimiuing
the Westein poweis access to Beilin, and to institute the blockade.
11e GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
Te next majoi step was the cieation of the Noith Atlantic
Tieaty Oiganization. Te tiue signicance of the NATO tieaty
was hidden, as the new Secietaiy of State Dean Acheson assuied
Congiess that it would not be followed by othei iegional pacts, that
no substantial numbeis of Ameiican tioops would be stationed
in Euiope, and that the Geimans would undei no ciicumstances
be ieaimedall untiue. Congiess was likewise piomised that the
United States was undei no obligation to extend militaiy aid to its
new allies, noi would an aims iace with the Soviet Union ensue.
!v
Events came to the aid of the globalists. ln Septembei 1v.v, the
Soviets exploded an atomic bomb. Congiess appioved the militaiy
appiopiiation foi NATO that Tiuman had iequested, which, in the
natuie of things, was followed by a fuithei Soviet buildup. Tis
escalating back and foith became the pauein foi the Cold Wai aims
iace foi the next fy yeais, much to the delight of U.S. aimaments
contiactois and the geneials and admiials on both sides.
Tui Kovi~N W~v
ln June 1vc, the National Secuiity Council adopted a majoi stiate-
gic document, NSC-ec, which declaied, implausibly enough, that a
defeat of fiee institutions anywheie is a defeat eveiywheie. Te
United States should no longei auempt to distinguish between
national and global secuiity. lnstead, it must stand at the political
and mateiial centei with othei fiee nations in vaiiable oibits aiound
it. NSC-ec, not declassied until 1v, called foi an immediate
thiee- oi foui-fold inciease in militaiy spending, which would seive
also to piime the pump of economic piospeiitythus foimalizing
militaiy Keynesianism as a peimanent xtuie of Ameiican life.
Moieovei, public opinion was to be conditioned to accept the laige
measuie of saciice and discipline needed to meet the piotean
Communist challenge foi the indenite futuie.
.c
!v
Lalebei, Aer:co, Rvss:o, onJ |e Co|J Vor, pp. c!c.. Some minoi awaid foi
Oiwellian Newspeak is due the Demociatic foieign aaiis leadei in the Senate,
TomConnally, who stated that NATOis but the logical extension of the piinciple
of the Monioe Doctiine.
.c
See especially Jeiiy W. Sandeis, PeJJ|ers o[ Cr:s:s Te Co:uee on |e
Presen Donger onJ |e Po|::cs o[ Cono:nen (Boston South End Piess, 1vc!),
also Gabiiel Kolko, Cenvr, o[ Vor Po|::cs, Con:c, onJ Soc:e, S:nce 1^1o (New
Yoik New Piess, 1vv.), pp. !vvc, and Powaski, Co|J Vor, pp. cce.
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 11
Even Tiuman was dubious on the piospects foi such a quan-
tum leap in globalism in a time of peace. But again, eventsand
Tiumans shiewd exploitation of themcame to the aid of the in-
teinationalist planneis. As one of Tiumans adviseis latei expiessed
it in June 1vc, we weie sweating ovei it, and then, thank God
Koiea came along.
.1
loi yeais, skiimishes and even majoi engagements had occuiied
acioss the !cth paiallel, which divided Noith fiom South Koiea. On
Januaiy 1z, 1vc, Secietaiy of State Acheson desciibed the Ameiican
defensive peiimetei as extending fiom the Aleutians to Japan to
the Philippines. South Koiea (as well as Taiwan) was conspicu-
ously placed outside this peiimetei. One ieason was that it was
not consideied to be of any militaiy value. Anothei was that Wash-
ington did not tiust South Koiean stiongman Syngman Rhee, who
iepeatedly thieatened to ieunite the countiy by foice. Rhee was
advocating a maich noith to Ameiican ocials as late as mid-June
1vc.
.z
On June z, it was Noith Koiea that auacked.
.!
Te next day,
Tiuman instiucted U.S. aii and naval foices to destioy Communist
supply lines. When bombing failed to pievent the headlong ietieat
of the South Koiean aimy, Tiuman sent Ameiican tioops stationed
in Japan to join the baule. Geneial Douglas MacAithui was able to
hold the iedoubt aiound Pusan, then, in an amphibious invasion at
lnchon, to begin the destiuction of the Noith Koiean position.
Afei the Noith Koieans ietieated behind the !cth paiallel, Tiu-
man decided against ending the wai on the basis of the sovs qvo
one. lnstead, he oideied MacAithui to move noith. Pyongyang
was to be the ist Communist capital libeiated, and the whole
peninsula was to be unied undei the iule of Syngman Rhee. As
U.N. foices (mainly Ameiican and South Koiean) swept noith, the
.1
Michael Schallei, Te Un:eJ Soes onJ C|:no :n |e T+en:e| Cenvr, (New
Yoik Oxfoid Univeisity Piess, 1vv), pp. 1!1!z.
.z
Biuce Cumings, Koreos P|oce :n |e Svn A MoJern H:sor, (New Yoik Noi-
ton, 1vv), pp. zc. Japan was unable to act as a counteiweight to Communist
iegimes in East Asia because, like Geimany, it had been annulled as a militaiy
powei. ln addition, the constitution imposed on Japan by the Ameiican occupieis
foiced it to ienounce waimaking as a soveieign iight.
.!
Te auack was authoiized by Stalin, in expectation that the United States
might eventually tuin [South Koiea] into a beachhead foi a ietuin to the Asian
mainland in alliance with a iesuigent Japan (Zubok, Stalins Plans, p. !c1).
11c GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
Chinese issued wainings against appioaching theii boidei at the
Yalu Rivei. Tese weie ignoied by an administiation somehow
unable to compiehend why China might feai massive U.S. foices
stationed on its fiontiei. Chinese tioops enteied the wai, piolong-
ing it by anothei thiee yeais, duiing which most of the Ameiican
casualties weie sustained.
..
MacAithui, who pioposed bombing
China itself, was dismissed by Tiuman, who at least spaied the
nation an even widei wai, possibly involving Russia as well.
Koiea aoided unpiecedented oppoitunities foi advancing the
globalist piogiam. Tiuman assigned the U.S. Seventh lleet to patiol
the stiait between Taiwan and the Chinese mainland. loui moie U.S.
divisions weie sent to Euiope, to add to the two alieady theie, and an-
othei s. billion was allocated foi the ieaimament of oui Euiopean al-
lies. Some months befoie the stait of the Koiean Wai, Tiuman had al-
ieady initiated Ameiicas fateful involvement in lndochina, suppoit-
ing the liench impeiialists and theii puppet iulei Bo i against the
nationalist and Communist ievolutionaiy H Chi Minh. Koiea fui-
nished welcome covei foi stepping up aid to the liench, which soon
amounted to a half-billion dollais a yeai. Te United States was thus
pioviding the gieat bulk of the mateiial iesouices foi liances colo-
nialist wai. Te State Depaitment defended this commitment, iathei
iidiculously, by citing lndochinas pioduction of much-needed iice,
iubbei, and tin. Moie to the point was the feai expiessed that the
loss of lndochina, including Vietnam, would iepiesent a defeat in
the stiuggle against what was poitiayed as a unied and cooidinated
Communist push to take ovei the woild.
.
At the same time, the degiadation of political language went
into high geai, wheie it iemained foi the iest of the Cold Wai and
piobably peimanently. To the authoiitaiian iegimes in Gieece and
Tuikey weie now added, as components of the liee Woild which
Ameiicans weie obligated to defend, Rhees autociatic Republic of
..
Eiic A. Noidlingei, Iso|o:on:s RecongvreJ Aer:con Fore:gn Po|:c, [or o
Ne+ Cenvr, (Piinceton, N.J. Piinceton Univeisity Piess, 1vv), pp. 1ecev.
.
Waltei Lalebei, Aer:co, Rvss:o, onJ |e Co|J Vor, pp. 1ccc, see also Hei-
iing, Aer:cos Longes Vor, pp. ez!. liances wai against the Vit Minh began
in 1v.e with a typical colonialist atiocity, when a liench ciuisei bombaided Hi
Phong, killing e,ccc civilians, ibid., p. . Acts of biutality such as this weie on
the minds of the isolationist Republicans like Taf, Geoige Bendei, and Howaid
Buet when they inveighed against Ameiican suppoit of Westein impeiialism in
teims which would be consideied lefist today.
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 11v
Koiea, Chiangs dictatoiship on Taiwan, and even colonialist liench
lndochina.
With the outbieak of the Koiean Wai, the Republicans capitula-
tion to globalism was piactically complete.
.e
As is standaid pioce-
duie in Ameiican politics, foieign policy was a non-issue in the 1v.c
piesidential campaign. Tomas E. Dewey, a cieatuie of the Eastein
establishment centeied in Wall Stieet, was as much of an oveiseas
meddlei as Tiuman. Now, in the stiuggle against inteinational
Communism, even eistwhile isolationists showed themselves to
be aich-inteiventionists when it came to Asia, going so fai as to
make a heio of MacAithui foi demanding an expansion of the wai
and the unleashing of Chiangs aimy on the mainland. Taf sup-
poited sending tioops to ght in Koiea, while enteiing one majoi
objection. Chaiacteiistically, it was on the constitutional question.
Tui PvisiuiN1 ~s W~vM~xiv A1 Wiii
When Noith Koiea invaded the South, Tiuman and Acheson claimed
unlimited piesidential authoiity to engage the United States in the
wai, which they kept iefeiiing to as a police action. Tiuman
stated Te piesident, as Commandei-in-Chief of the Aimed loices
of the United States, has full contiol ovei the use theieof.
.
Tis ies
in the face of Aiticle 1, section c of the U.S. Constitution, wheie the
powei to declaie wai is vested in Congiess. Te delibeiations at the
Constitutional Convention and othei statements of the lounding
latheis aie unequivocal in this iespect. While the piesident, as
commandei-in-chief, is given authoiity to deploy Ameiican foices
in waitime, it is Congiess that decides on wai oi peace. Wouldnt it
be suipassing stiange if the loundeis, so conceined to limit, divide,
and balance powei, had lef the decision to engage the countiy in
wai to the will of a single individual`
.c
.e
On the shif of conseivatives fiom isolationism to inteinationalism, see
Muiiay N. Rothbaid, Te Tiansfoimation of the Ameiican Right, Con:nvv
(Summei 1ve.), pp. zzc!1.
.
John Hait Ely, Vor onJ Resons:|:|:, Cons:v:ono| Lessons o[ V:eno onJ
Is A]ero| (Piinceton, N.J. Piinceton Univeisity Piess, 1vv!), pp. 1c11.
.c
See, foi example, James Wilsons statement Tis system will not huiiy us
into wai, it is calculated to guaid against it. lt will not be in the powei of a single
man, oi a single body of men, to involve us in such distiess, foi the impoitant
powei of declaiing wai is vested in the legislatuie at laige. lbid., p. !. lllustiative
1zc GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
So well-established was this piinciple that even Woodiow Wil-
son and lianklin Roosevelt, no minimizeis of executive pieiogatives,
bowed to it and went to Congiess foi theii declaiations of wai. lt
was Tiuman who daied what even his piedecessoi had not. As two
constitutional scholais, liancis D. Woimuth and Edwin B. liimage,
have wiiuen
Te Constitution is not ambiguous. . . . Te eaily piesidents,
and indeed eveiyone in the countiy until the yeai 1vc, denied
that the piesident possessed [the powei to initiate wai]. Teie
is no sustained body of usage to suppoit such a claim.
.v
At the time, college histoiy piofessois iushed to blazon the al-
legedly countless occasions when piesidents sent U.S. foices into wai
oi wailike situations without congiessional appioval. Lists of such
occasions weie afeiwaid compiled by othei apologists foi execu-
tive powei in foieign aaiisin 1v1, foi instance, by the ieveied
conseivative Baiiy Goldwatei. Tese incidents have been caiefully
examined by Woimuth and liimage, who conclude
One cannot be suie, but the numbei of cases in which piesi-
dents have peisonally made the decision [in contiast, foi in-
stance, to oveizealous militaiy and naval oceis] unconsti-
tutionally to engage in wai oi in acts of wai piobably lies
between one and two dozen. And in all those cases the piesi-
dents have made false claims of authoiization, eithei by statute
oi by tieaty oi by inteinational law. Tey have not ielied on
theii poweis as commandei in chief oi as chief executive.
c
At all events, as Chief Justice Eail Waiien held in 1vev, aiticulating a
well-known constitutional piinciple on behalf of seven othei Justices
Tat an unconstitutional action has been taken befoie suiely does
not iendei that action any less unconstitutional at a latei date.
1
of the piesent-day decay of constitutional thinking is the statement of the noted
conseivative advocate of the doctiine of oiiginal intent Robeit Boik (ibid., p. )
Te need foi piesidents to have that powei [to use militaiy foice abioad without
Congiessional appioval], paiticulaily in the modein age, should be obvious to
almost anyone.
.v
liancis D. Woimuth and Edwin B. liimage, To C|o:n |e Dog o[ Vor Te
Vor Po+er o[ Congress :n H:sor, onJ Lo+, znd ed. (Uibana Univeisity of lllinois
Piess, 1vcv), p. 11.
c
lbid.
1
lbid., p. 1!.
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1z1
Te administiation sometimes alluded to the vote of the U.N.
Secuiity Council appioving militaiy action in Koiea as fuinishing
the necessaiy authoiity. Tis was nothing but a smokescieen. liist,
because accoiding to the U.N. Chaitei, any Secuiity Council com-
mitment of membeis tioops must be consistent with the membeis
iespective constitutional piocesses. Te United Nations Paiticipa-
tion Act of 1v. also iequiied congiessional iatication foi the use
of Ameiican foices. ln any case, Tiuman stated that he would send
tioops to Koiea whethei oi not authoiized by the Secuiity Council.
His position ieally was that any piesident may plunge the countiy
into wai simply on his own say-so.
z
Today piesidents asseit the iight to bomb at will countiies which,
like Noith Koiea in 1vc, nevei auacked us and with which we aie
not at waiSudan, Afghanistan, liaq, and, iepeatedly, Yugoslavia.
Tey aie eageily seconded in this by conseivative politicians
and publicists, noi does the Ameiican public demui. Back in 1v.c,
Chailes Beaid alieady noted the dismal ignoiance among oui peo-
ple of the piinciples of oui iepublican goveinment
Ameiican education fiom the univeisities down to the giade
schools is peimeated with, if not dominated by, the theoiy of
piesidential supiemacy in foieign aaiis. Coupled with the
agiant neglect of instiuction in constitutional goveinment,
this piopaganda . . . has deeply implanted in the minds of
iising geneiations the doctiine that the powei of the piesi-
dent ovei inteinational ielations is, foi all piactical puiposes,
illimitable.
!
z
Ely, Vor onJ Resons:|:|:,, pp. 11z n. ec. A yeai eailiei the Noith At-
lantic Tieaty had been submiued to the Senate foi appioval. Aiticle specically
ensuied that U.S. iesponse to aggiession in the aiea coveied by the alliance
would be goveined by constitutional piocesses theieby iequiiing congiessional
appioval. Ponawski, To+orJ Fnong|:ng A||:once, pp. zcccv. On the oiigins
of unlimited piesidential waimaking poweis, see Robeit Shogan, HorJ Borgo:n
Ho+ FDR T+:seJ C|vrd:||s Ar, F+oJeJ |e Lo+, onJ C|ongeJ |e Ro|e o[ |e
Aer:con Pres:Jenc,, papeiback edition (Bouldei, Colo. Westview, 1vvv), pieface
to the papeiback edition, Paving the Way to Kosovo.
!
Chailes A. Beaid, Pres:Jen Roose+e| onJ |e Co:ng o[ |e Vor, 1^o1 ASvJ,
:n Aeoronces onJ Reo|::es (New Haven, Conn. Yale Univeisity Piess, 1v.c),
p. vc. Beaid listed as among the majoi puiveyois of this doctiine poweiful
piivate agencies engaged nominally in piopaganda foi peace, which look to
the piesident to advance theii ideas foi oideiing and ieoideiing the woild.
1zz GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
Needless to say, the situation has in no way impioved, as the
public schools giind out tens of millions of futuie voteis to whom
the notion, say, that James Madison had something to do with the
Constitution of the United States would come as an uninteiesting
ievelation.
Te Koiean Wai lasted thiee yeais and cost !e,v1e Ameiican
deaths and moie than 1cc,ccc othei casualties. Additionally, theie
weie millions of Koiean dead and the devastation of the peninsula,
especially in the noith, wheie the U.S. Aii loice pulveiized the
civilian infiastiuctuiewith much collateial damagein what
has since become its emblematic method of waging wai.
.
Today,
neaily a half-centuiy afei the end of the conict, the United States
continues to station tioops as a tiipwiie in yet anothei of its im-
peiial outposts.
Doug Bandow, Tr:+:re Koreo onJ U.S. Fore:gn Po|:c, :n o C|ongeJ Vor|J
(Washington, D.C. Cato lnstitute, 1vve).
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1z!
Te misinteipietation of the Noith Koiean aggiession as pait
of a giand design at woild conquest oiiginating in and con-
tiolled by Moscow iesulted in a diastic militaiization of the
cold wai in the foim of a conventional and nucleai aima-
ments iace, the fiantic seaich foi alliances, and the establish-
ment of militaiy bases.
e
Tiuman is gloiied foi his conduct of foieign aaiis moie than
anything else. Whethei one concuis in this judgment depends
mainly on the kind of countiy one wishes Ameiica to be. Stephen
Ambiose has summed up the iesults of the foieign policy of Haiiy
Tiuman
When Tiuman became piesident he led a nation anxious to
ietuin to tiaditional civil-militaiy ielations and the histoiic
Ameiican foieign policy of noninvolvement. When he lef
the White House his legacy was an Ameiican piesence on
eveiy continent of the woild and an enoimously expanded
aimament industiy. Yet so successfully had he scaied hell
out of the Ameiican people, the only ciitics to ieceive any
auention in the mass media weie those who thought Tiuman
had not gone fai enough in standing up to the communists.
loi all his tioubles, Tiuman had tiiumphed.
Ambiose, R:se o G|o|o|:s, p. 1c. On the ultimate piice paid by the nation
foi Tiumans tiiumph, see the impoitant aiticle by Robeit Higgs, Te Cold Wai
Economy Oppoitunity Costs, ldeology, and the Politics of Ciisis, F:|oro:ons
:n Fcono:c H:sor, !1 (1vv.), pp. zc!!1z.
1z. GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
stop. Well diaf them and think about the law latei, he iepoitedly
iemaiked.
c
McCullough neglected to note that bold action in
deance of law is consideied a chaiacteiistic of fascist iegimes.
On May z, Tiuman addiessed Congiess, iequesting the authoi-
ity to diaf into the Aimed loices of the United States all woikeis
who aie on stiike against theii goveinment. His pioposal was
gieeted with tumultuous applause, and the House quickly appioved
the bill by !ce to 1!. ln the Senate, though, the bill was stopped in
its tiacks by Senatoi Taf. He was joined by lef-libeials like Claude
Peppei of lloiida. Eventually, the Senate iejected the bill by c
to 1!.
Latei that yeai, anothei ciisis led Tiuman to contemplate fui-
thei exeicise of dictatoiial powei. While most of the waitime piice
contiols had been lifed by this time, contiols iemained on a numbei
of items, most piominently meat. Stiangely enough, it was piecisely
in that commodity that a shoitage and a black maiket developed.
Te meat shoitage was eioding suppoit foi the Demociats, who
began to look with tiepidation on the upcoming congiessional elec-
tions. Paity woikeis weie told by usually loyal voteis, No meat,
no votes. Tiuman was foiced to act. He would addiess the nation
again, announcing and explaining the decision he had made.
ln his diaf foi the speech, Tiuman was biuei. He indicted the
Ameiican people foi theii gieed and selshness, so dieient fiom
the seless patiiotism of the heioes who had won the Medal of
Honoi. Te diaf continued
Youve deseited youi piesident foi a mess of pouage, a piece
of beefa side of bacon. . . . lf you the people insist on fol-
lowing Mammon instead of Almighty God, youi piesident
cant stop you all by himself. l can no longei enfoice a law
you wont suppoit. . . . Youve gone ovei to the poweis of
selshness and gieed.
v
Tis ciazy tiiade was omiued fiom the speech Tiuman made on
Octobei 1..
ec
But evei the cheap demagogue, he pilloiied the meat
c
David McCullough, Trvon (NewYoik Simon and Schustei, 1vvz), pp. c1ce.
v
Hamby, Mon o[ |e Peo|e, pp. !czc!.
ec
Pv||:c Poers o[ |e Pres:Jens o[ |e Un:eJ Soes Horr, S. Trvon, 1^oo
(Washington, D.C. U.S. Goveinment Piinting Oce, 1vez), pp. .1.
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1z
industiy as iesponsible foi the shoitage, those who, in oidei fui-
thei to fauen theii piots, aie endangeiing the health of oui people
by holding back vital foods which aie now ieady foi maiket and
foi which the Ameiican people aie clamoiing. Te failed habei-
dashei, it appeais, had liule undeistanding of the iole that r:ces
might play in a maiket economy ln his speech, Tiuman conded
that he had caiefully weighed and discussed with his cabinet and
economic expeits a numbei of possible solutions. One was to have
the Goveinment seize the packing houses. But this would not have
helped, since the packing houses weie empty. Ten came a notion
that would indeed be a diastic iemedy that the goveinment go
out onto the faims and ianges and seize the caule foi slaughtei.
Tiuman gave the idea long and seiious consideiation. Heie is
why, in the end, he declined to go the ioute of the Bolsheviks in
the Ukiaine
We decided against the use of this extieme waitime emei-
gency powei of Goveinment. lt would be wholly impiacti-
cable because the caule aie spiead thioughout all paits of
the countiy.
e1
Tis statement fiom the feisty, Neai-Gieat Man of the People
deseives to be iead moie than once.
ez
So, sadly and ieluctantly Tiuman announced the end of piice
contiols on meat, although he advised the countiy that some items,
like ient, will have to be contiolled foi a long time to come.
On Apiil c, 1vz, as a nationwide stiike loomed in the steel indus-
tiy, Tiuman issued Executive Oidei 1c!.c, diiecting his Secietaiy of
Commeice Chailes Sawyei to seize the steel mills.
He acted, he claimed, by viitue of the authoiity vested in me by
the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and as Piesident
of the United States and Commandei-in-Chief of the aimed foices
of the United States.
e!
He could not, howevei, point to any such
law, despite his iefeience to the laws of the United States. Noi
did any piovision of the Constitution give the piesident the iight to
e1
lbid., p. .!.
ez
Muiiay N. Rothbaid dealt with this giab foi powei in a biilliant piece of
economic jouinalism, Piice Contiols Aie Back' in his Mo|:ng Fcono:c Sense
(Aubuin, Ala. Ludwig von Mises lnstitute, 1vv), pp. 1z!z.
e!
Woimuth and liimage, To C|o:n |e Dog o[ Vor, p. 1..
1ze GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
seize piivate piopeity by pioclamation. But, as McCullough tells us,
Tiuman was convinced fiomhis ieading of histoiy that his action
fell within his poweis as Piesident and Commandei-in-Chief. Afei
all, hadnt Lincoln suspended the wiit of |o|eos corvs duiing a
national emeigency`
e.
On Apiil v, the Stai-Spangled Bannei was
iaised ovei the nations steel mills, and the steel companies imme-
diately took the case to couit.
At a news confeience on Apiil 1, Tiuman was asked Mi. Pies-
ident, if you can seize the steel mills undei youi inheient poweis,
can you, in youi opinion, also seize the newspapeis and/oi the ia-
dio stations` Tiuman ieplied Undei similai ciicumstances the
Piesident of the United States has to act foi whatevei is foi the best
of the countiy. Tats the answei to youi question.
e
Te next day, the New Yoik Times iepoited
Te piesident iefused to elaboiate. But White House souices
said the piesidents point was that he had powei in an emei-
gency, to take ovei any poition of the business community
acting to jeopaidize all the people.
Te case of Yovngso+n S|ee &Tv|e Co. +. So+,er quickly ieached
the Supieme Couit, wheie Tiumans aigument was iejected by a
vote of e to !. Speaking foi the thiee was Tiumans old ciony, Chief
Justice lied Vinson, who aigued that the piesident had the authoiity
to enact all laws necessaiy foi caiiying out laws pieviously passed
by Congiess. Any man woithy of the oce of piesident, Vinson
wiote, should be fiee to take at least inteiim action necessaiy to
execute legislative piogiams essential to the suivival of the nation.
Te majoiity, including Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, lelix
liankfuitei, and even Tiumans foimei Auoiney Geneial, Tom
Claik, decided otheiwise.
ee
At that Apiil 1 news confeience, no iepoitei thought to ask a
follow-up question to Tiumans stunning ieply. His claim of the
e.
McCullough, Trvon, pp. cvev. McCulloughs implied apology foi Tiu-
man heie is a good indication of the tenoi and calibei of his gaigantuan pu-piece.
loi a debunking of McCullough by two scholais, see the ieviewby Gai Alpeiovitz
and Kai Biid, Giving Haiiy Hell, Te No:on (May 1c, 1vv!), pp. e.c.1.
e
Te Pv||:c Poers o[ Horr, S. Trvon, 1^.I (Washington, D.C. U.S. Gov-
einment Piinting Oce, 1vee), pp. zz!.
ee
McCullough, Trvon, pp. vccc1.
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1z
unlimited iight to dispose at his discietion of the piopeity of any
and all citizensa viewpoint foi which a king of England was be-
headedmade as liule impiession on the piess then as it has on his
admiieis evei since. One wondeis what it would take to spaik theii
outiage oi even theii inteiest.
e
ln economic policy, the yeais of Tiumans laii Deal weie
a time of consolidation and expansion of goveinment powei. ln
lebiuaiy 1v.e, the Employment Act was passed. lnspiied by the
newly dominant Keynesian economics, it declaied that hencefoith
the economic health of the nation was piimaiily the iesponsibility
of the ledeial goveinment. With the coming of the Koiean Wai,
economic contiols weie again the oidei of the day (Beinaid Baiuch
was once moie, foi the thiid time since 1v1, a piime agitatoi
foi theii intioduction.) Tiuman declaied a national emeigency.
New boaids and agencies oveisaw piices and wages, established
piioiities in mateiials allocation, and instituted contiols ovei ciedit
and othei sectois of the economy.
ec
As in the woild wais, the
afeimath of Tiumans Koiean Wai exhibited the iatchet-eect,
wheieby ledeial goveinment spending, though diminished, nevei
ietuined to the pievious peacetime level.
ev
A Hivi1~ci oi SiNxuoiis
Tiumans legacy includes piogiams and policies that continue to
inict damage to this day. Tiee cases aie especially notewoithy.
e
One Congiessman was led by Tiumans iemaiks and his seizuie of the steel
mills to demand his impeachment (Ne+ Yor| T:es, Apiil 1v, 1vz). Geoige Ben-
dei, Republican of Ohio, stated l do not believe that oui people can toleiate
the foimation of a piesidential piecedent which would peimit any occupant of
the White House to exeicise his untiammeled discietion to take ovei the indus-
tiy, communications system oi othei foims of piivate enteipiise in the name of
emeigency. But Bendei was one of the last, and best, of the Old Right leadeis
and thus out of tune with the times. Of couise the Ameiican people could and
did toleiate such a piecedent. What is still unceitain is whethei theie is any limit
whatevei to theii toleiance of acts of oppiession by the goveinment.
ec
Robeit Higgs, Cr:s:s onJ Le+:o|on Cr::co| F:soJes :n |e Gro+| o[ Aer:
con Go+ernen (New Yoik Oxfoid Univeisity Piess, 1vc), pp. zz, z....
ev
Jonathan R. T. Hughes, Te Go+erneno| Ho|: Fcono:c Conro|s [ro
Co|on:o| T:es o |e Presen (New Yoik Basic Books, 1v), pp. zcccv. ledeial
expendituies in the eaily Eisenhowei yeais weie, on aveiage, twice as high as in
the peiiod 1v.1vc.
1zc GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
ln his message to Congiess on Januaiy zc, 1v.v, Tiuman launched
the concept of aid fiom Westein goveinments to the pooiei nations
that weie soon to be called, collectively, the Tiid Woild. Point
loui of his speech sketched a new piogiam to piovide technical
assistance to the moie than half the people of the woild [who] aie
living in conditions appioaching miseiy, and whose economic life
is piimitive and stagnant. Tis was to be a coopeiative enteipiise
in which all nations woik togethei thiough the United Nations and
its specialized agenciesin othei woids, a state-funded and state-
diiected eoit to end woild poveity.
c
Accoiding to Petei Bauei, Point loui inauguiated a fai-ieaching
policy and a suppoiting teiminology.
1
ln the decades that fol-
lowed, foieign aid was piomoted by a piolifeiating inteinational
buieauciacy, as well as by ieligious and seculai zealots ignoiantly
condent of the puiity of theii anti-social cause. Westein guilt
feelings, fosteied by the lefist intelligentsia and self-seeking Tiid
Woild politicians, have facilitated the channeling of hundieds of bil-
lions of dollais to goveinments in Asia, Afiica, and Latin Amei-
ica. Today, even conseivative politicians and publicists aie devo-
tees. Development aid has become institutionalized and is in-
tended to continue indenitely, with all its auendant haim iein-
foiced statism, infeiioi economic peifoimance, and coiiuption on
the gieatest scale the woild has evei known.
z
Tiuman began the special ielationship between the United
States and Zionism. lianklin Roosevelt, while not blind to Zionist
inteiests, favoied an evenhanded appioach in the Middle East as
between Aiabs and Jews. Tiuman, on the othei hand, was an all-
out champion of the Zionist cause.
!
Teie weie two majoi ieasons foi Tiumans suppoit. One was a
sentimental auachment that was stiongly ieinfoiced by many who
c
Te Pv||:c Poers o[ Horr, S. Trvon, 1^o^ (Washington, D.C. U.S. Govein-
ment Piinting Oce, 1ve.), pp. 11.1.
1
Petei Bauei, Fqvo|:,, |e T:rJ Vor|J, onJ Fcono:c De|vs:on (Cambiidge,
Mass. Haivaid Univeisity Piess, 1vc1), pp. 1!v, z n. 1. See also Petei Bauei
and Cianley Onslow, lify Yeais of lailuie, Te Secoor (Septembei , 1vvc),
pp. 1!1..
z
Giaham Hancock, LorJs o[ Po+er, Te Po+er, Pres:ge, onJ Corrv:on o[ |e
Inerno:ono| A:J Bvs:ness (New Yoik Atlantic Monthly Piess, 1vcv).
!
Alfied M. Lilienthal, Te Z:on:s Connec:on V|o Pr:ce Peoce' (New Yoik
Dodd, Mead, 1vc), pp. .1cc.
HARRY S. TRUMAN ADVANClNG THE REVOLUTlON 1zv
had inuence with him, including his old business paitnei, Eddie
Jacobson as well as David K. Niles and Eleanoi Roosevelt.
.
Visiting
the piesident, the Chief Rabbi of lsiael told him God put you in
youi motheis womb so that you could be the instiument to biing
about the iebiith of lsiael afei two thousand yeais. lnstead of
taking oense at such chutzpah, the piesident was deeply moved.
One of his biogiapheis iepoits At that, gieat teais staited iolling
down Haiiy Tiumans cheeks.
.
Te depth of Eleanois undeistanding of the Middle East situation is illus-
tiated by hei statement lm condent that when a Jewish state is set up, the
Aiabs will see the light they will quiet down, and Palestine will no longei be a
pioblem. Evan M. Wilson, Dec:s:on on Po|es:ne Ho+ |e U.S. Coe o Recogn::e
Isroe| (Stanfoid, Cal. Hoovei lnstitution Piess, 1vv), p. 11e.
Te Biitish histoiian Aithui Biyant, wiiting in 1v.c, put the guie even
highei, at ccc,ccc foi the last two yeais of the blockade, about fy times moie
than weie diowned by submaiine auacks on Biitish shipping. Cited in J. l. C.
lullei, Te ConJvc o[ Vor, 18^1^o1 (London Eyie &Spouiswoode, 1ve1), p. 1c.
c
l. W. Wile, Te Huns of 1v.c, Vee||, D:sod, Septembei c, 1v1c.
STARVlNG A PEOPLE lNTO SUBMlSSlON zc!
Geimans weie peimiued to impoit iaw mateiials and expoit man-
ufactuied goods.
Heibeit Hoovei iesumed his humanitaiian eoits in the Sec-
ond Woild Wai. ln 1v.c he wained of impending staivation in
Geiman-occupied Euiope, in the Low Countiies, Noiway, and es-
pecially Poland. His eoits weie stymied by Chuichill, howevei.
Hoovei afeiwaids concluded that the Piime Ministei was a mili-
taiist of the extieme old school who held that the incidental stai-
vation of women and childien was justied if it contiibuted to the
eailiei ending of the wai by victoiy. Hooveis Polish Relief had
been feeding some zcc,ccc peisons daily. Hoovei wiote that when
Chuichill succeeded Chambeilain as Piime Ministei in May, 1v.c,
he soon stopped all peimits of food ielief to Poland. Chuichills
cheiished policy of inicting famine on civilians was thus extended
to fiiendly peoples. Te Poles and the otheis would be peimiued
food when and if they iose up and diove out the Geimans.
v
Anothei
of Chuichills ieckless, lethal fantasies.
To ietuin to the hungei blockade of the liist Woild Wai, besides
its diiect eects theie aie the piobable indiiect and much moie dam-
aging eects to considei. A Geiman child who was ten yeais old
in 1v1c and who suivived was twenty-two in 1v!c. Vincent iaises
the question of whethei the sueiing fiom hungei in the eaily,
foimative yeais help account to some degiee foi the enthusiasm of
Geiman youth foi Nazism latei on. Diawing on a 1v1 aiticle by Pe-
tei Loewenbeig, he aigues in the aimative.
1c
Loewenbeigs woik,
howevei, is a specimen of psychohistoiy and his conclusions aie
explicitly founded on psychoanalytic doctiine. Although Vincent
does not endoise them unieseivedly, he leans towaid explaining
the latei behavioi of the geneiation of Geiman childien scaiied by
the wai yeais in teims of an emotional oi neivous impaiiment of
iational thought. Tus, he iefeis to the ominous amalgamation of
v
Nicholson Bakei, Hvon So|e, pp. zzc, zz!.
1c
Petei Loewenbeig, Te Psychohistoiical Oiigins of the Nazi Youth Cohoits,
Aer:con H:sor:co| Re+:e+ e, no. (Decembei 1v1), pp. 1.cz. Loewenbeig
wiites, foi instance Te wai and postwai expeiiences of the small childien and
youth of Woild Wai l explicitly conditioned the natuie and success of National So-
cialism. Te new adults who became politically eective afei 1vzv and who lled
the ianks of the SA[StoimTioops, Biown Shiits] and the othei paiamilitaiy paity
oiganizations . . . weie the childien socialized in the liist Woild Wai. (p. 1.c)
zc. GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
twisted emotion and physical degiadation, which was to piesage
consideiable miseiy foi Geimany and the woild and which was
pioduced in laige pait by the staivation policy.
But is such an appioach necessaiy` lt seems much moie plau-
sible to seek foi the mediating connections between exposuie to
staivation and the othei toiments caused by the blockade and latei
fanatical and biutal Geiman behavioi in commonly intelligible
though, of couise, not theieby justiablehuman auitudes genei-
ated by the eaily expeiiences. Tese would include hatied, deep-
seated biueiness and iesentment, and a disiegaid foi the value of
life of otheis because the value of ones own life and the lives
of ones family, fiiends, and compatiiots had been so iuthlessly
disiegaided. Astaiting point foi such an analysis could be Teodoie
Abels 1v!c woik, V|, H:|er Coe :no Po+er An Ans+er BoseJ on
|e Or:g:no| L:[e Sor:es o[ S:: HvnJreJ o[ H:s Fo||o+ers. Loewen-
beigs conclusion afei studying this woik that the most stiiking
emotional aect expiessed in the Abel autobiogiaphies aie the adult
memoiies of intense hungei and piivation fiom childhood.
11
An
inteipietation that would accoid the hungei blockade its piopei
place in the iise of Nazi savageiy has no paiticulai need foi a psy-
choanalytical oi physiological undeipinning.
Occasionally Vincents views on issues maiginal to his theme
aie distiessingly steieotyped he appeais to accept an extieme lis-
chei school inteipietation of guilt foi the oiigin of the wai as adhei-
ing to the Geiman goveinment alone, and, conceining the foitunes
of the Weimai Republic, he states Tat Geimany lost this op-
poitunity is one of the tiagedies of the twentieth centuiy. . . . Too
ofen the old socialists seemed almost teiiied of socialization. Te
clich that, if only heavy industiy had been socialized in 1v1v, then
Geiman demociacy could have been saved, was nevei veiy convinc-
ing. lt is pioving less so as ieseaich begins to suggest that it was
piecisely the Weimai system of massive state inteivention in the
laboi maikets and the advanced welfaie state institutions (the most
piogiessive of theii time) that so weakened the Geiman economy
that it collapsed in the face of the Gieat Depiession.
1z
Tis collapse,
11
lbid., p. 1.vv.
1z
Te debate among Geiman economic histoiians on this question is discussed
in Jigen von Kiuedenei, Die Ubeifoideiung dei Weimaiei Republik als Sozial-
staat, Gesd:de vnJ Gese||sdo] 11, no. ! (1vc), !ce.
STARVlNG A PEOPLE lNTO SUBMlSSlON zc
paiticulaily the staggeiing unemployment that accompanied it, has
long been consideied by scholais to have been a majoi cause of the
Nazi iise to powei in 1v!c!!.
Tese aie, howevei, negligible points in view of the seivice
Vincent has peifoimed both in ieclaiming fiom oblivion past vic-
tims of a muideious state policy and in deepening oui undeistand-
ing of twentieth-centuiy Euiopean histoiy. Teie has iecently
occuiied in the ledeial Republic of Geimany a dispute of histoii-
ans ovei whethei the Nazi slaughtei of the Euiopean Jews should
be viewed as unique oi placed within the context of othei mass
muideis, specically the Stalinist atiocities against the Ukiainian
peasantiy.
1!
Vincents woik suggests the possibility that the fiame-
woik of the discussion ought to be widened moie than any of the
paiticipants has so fai pioposed.
1!
H:sor:|ersre:. D:e Do|veno:on Jer Konro+erse v J:e F:n::gor:g|e:
Jer no:ono|so::o|:s:sden }vJen+ern:dvng (Munich Pipei, 1vc).
Cu~v1iv 1c
John T. llynn and
the Apotheosis of
lianklin Roosevelt
Albeit Jay Nock, distinguished man of leueis and philosophical an-
aichist, was an inspiiation to thinkeis as diveise as Muiiay Roth-
baid and Robeit Nisbet, liank Chodoiov and Russell Kiik. A pei-
sonal fiiend of the fathei of William l. Buckley, Ji., he was a kind
of guiu to the young Buckley as well. ln Apiil, 1v., Nock wiote a
cheeiy leuei to two of his fiiends, desciibing the death of lianklin
Roosevelt as the biggest public impiovement that Ameiica has ex-
peiienced since the passage of the Bill of Rights, and pioposing a
celebiation luncheon at Luchows.
1
Today Nocks unabashed delight would be iegaided as obscene,
a saciilege against the civic ieligion of the United States. Republi-
can no less than Demociatic leadeis ieveie and invoke the memoiy
Tis essay, somewhat modied heie, seived as an intioduction to the cth an-
niveisaiy edition of John T. llynns Te Roose+e| M,|, published by lox &
Wilkes, v!c Howaid St., San liancisco, v.1c!.
1
Albeit Jay Nock, Leuers [ro A||er }o, NoJ, 1^.o1^o (Caldwell, ld. Cax-
ton, 1v.v), p. z11.
zc
zcc GREAT WARS AND GREAT LEADERS
of lianklin Roosevelt. His piaises aie sung fiom the Vo|| Sree
}ovrno| to the Ne+ Yor| T:es, and heids of histoiians (the phiase
is Menckens) iegulaily announce that lDR was one of oui tiuly
Gieat Piesidents. Symbolic of his apotheosis was the dedication,
in May, 1vv, of the vast lianklin Delano Roosevelt Memoiial in
Washington, D.C. As the T:es happily iepoited, it is a memo-
iial laced with a zest foi the powei of goveinment. Te cuiient
executois of that powei had eageily lent theii plundeied suppoit,
Congiess voting s.z. million, with bipaitisan enthusiasm. Amid
the hosannas that iose up eveiywheie in politics and the piess, the
few dissident voices weie inaudible. Te dominant ciedo is that, as
an editoi of the Vo|| Sree }ovrno| infoimed us, ciiticism of lDR is
conceivable only fiom enemies maddened by hatied of him.
Yet it is a fact that thioughout his long piesidency lDR was
hotly opposed, even pilloiied, by a host of intelligent, iespected, and
patiiotic men and women. Te most consistent of his adveisaiies
foimed a loose coalition known today as the Old Right.
z
Teie is
liule doubt that the best infoimed and most tenacious of the Old
Right foes of lianklin Roosevelt was John T. llynn.
When llynn came to wiite his majoi study of the foui-teim
piesident, he aptly titled it Te Roose+e| M,|. Myths continue to
abound conceining Roosevelt and his ieign, one of the most con-
venient is that the antagonists of his New Deal weie all economic
ioyalists, self-seiving beneciaiies and moneyed defendeis of the
status quo. ln llynns case, such an accusation is laughable. When
he became a ciitic of the NewDeal, llynn enjoyed a well-established
ieputation as a piogiessive and a muckiakei, with, as Bill Kauman
wiites, a taste foi plutociat blood.
!
John Tomas llynn was boin in 1ccz into a middle class liish
Catholic family in the subuibs of Washington, and educated ist in
public schools, then in the paiochial schools of New Yoik City. Te
debate that iaged aiound 1vcc on U.S. annexation of the Philippines
seems to have exeicised a foimative inuence on the young llynn
all his life he iemained an iesolute opponent of Westein, including
z
Sheldon Richman, New Deal Nemesis Te Old Right Jeeisonians, Te
InJeenJen Re+:e+, lall 1vve, and Justin Raimondo, Rec|o::ng |e Aer:con
R:g| Te Los Legoc, o[ |e Conser+o:+e Mo+een (Builingame, Cal. Centei
foi Libeitaiian Studies, 1vv!).
!
Bill Kauman, Aer:co F:rs! Is H:sor,, Cv|vre, onJ Po|::cs (Amheist, N.Y.
Piometheus, 1vv), p. c.
JOHN T. lLYNN AND THE APOTHEOSlS Ol ROOSEVELT zcv
Ameiican, impeiialism. He studied law at Geoigetown, but found
jouinalism iiiesistible. Afei seiving as editoi on papeis in New
Haven and New Yoik, he woiked as a fieelance wiitei exposing
ciooked nancial dealings on Wall Stieet. ln the eaily and mid-
1v!cs, llynn authoied a seiies of books auacking the tiusts and what
he viewed as the misdeeds of the secuiities business. His GoJs Go|J
Te Sor, o[ RoJe[e||er onJ H:s T:es (1v!z) became something of a
classic.
.
llynn was not a stiict libeitaiian noi was his thinking on eco-
nomics notably sophisticated. He fully appieciated the pioductive
dynamism of the piivate-piopeity maiket economy. But in his pio-
giessive phase, he held that goveinment had a ciucial iole to play
in ieining in the excesses of capitalism, by thwaiting monopo-
lies, piotecting small investois, and undeitaking modeiate social
iefoim. Yet he was nevei a socialist, to his mind, the hopes foi
a fiee and piospeious society lay in a tiuly competitive piivate-
enteipiise system.