Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 158

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL

Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. Sulphur Management Facility Bruderheim, Alberta


Located within: Sec 35-055-20 W4M

Submitted to:

Alberta Environment
In Accordance with the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act

Submitted by:

Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd., a division of Hazco Environmental Services Ltd. October 19, 2005
Revised

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 DATE OF APPLICATION: .................................................................................................... 1 NAME OF APPLICANT: ....................................................................................................... 1 CONTACT PERSON:. .......................................................................................................... 1 ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: .................................................................................................. 1 TELEPHONE NUMBER:....................................................................................................... 1 FAX NUMBER:................................................................................................................... 1 NAME OF FACILITY: .......................................................................................................... 1 LOCATION OF FACILITY:.................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF APPLICATION:............................................................................................... 1 CORPORATE INFORMATION: .............................................................................................. 1

SECTION 2:FACILITY OVERVIEW & RATIONALE ..........................................................2 2.1 2.2 FACILITY OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................... 2 FACILITY MARKET ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 2

SECTION 3: SITING & FACILITY DESIGN ...........................................................................6 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 6 SITING INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 6 FACILITY DESIGN .............................................................................................................. 8 FACILITY OPERATION ...................................................................................................... 10 PROPOSED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ................................................... 10 OTHER APPROVALS ......................................................................................................... 10

SECTION 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................12 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES ....................................................................... 12 WASTE MINIMIZATION ..................................................................................................... 13 MONITORING & REPORTING ............................................................................................ 13 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS & CONTINGENCY PLANS ................................................... 14 CLOSURE AND RECLAMATION PLAN ................................................................................. 14

SECTION 5: PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROGRAM..........................................................15 5.1 5.2 GENERAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 15 PUBLIC CONSULTATION DETAILS ...................................................................................... 15

SECTION 6: LEGAL AND MUNICIPAL INFORMATION .................................................17 6.1 6.2 CONFIRMATION OF LEGAL CONTROL OF THE SITE ............................................................ 17 MUNICIPAL PLANNING & ZONING.................................................................................... 17 Page i

6.3

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ................................................................................................... 17

SECTION 7: CLOSING REMARKS: .......................................................................................18

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Project Schedule Appendix A-1: Engineering, Procurement and Construction Schedule Appendix B: Site Mapping Appendix B-1: Site Plan Appendix B-2: Topographic Map of Sec. 35-055-20 W4M Appendix C: Facility Design Appendix C-1: Facility Process Flow Diagram Appendix C-2: Sulphur Storage Pad Plan & Details (Drawing No. 085433-5901-0003) Appendix C-3: Dust Suppression Product Data Sheets Appendix C-4: Storm Water Run-Off and Fire Water Supply Pond Plan & Details (Drawing No. 085433-5901-0002) Appendix D: Public Consultation Program Details Appendix D-1: Open House Notifications (Redwater Review) Appendix D-2: Public Consultation Contact List Appendix D-3: Open House Sign-In Sheet Appendix D-4: Open House Presentation Boards Appendix D-5 Resident Correspondence Appendix D-6: Project Information Package Appendix E: Offer to Purchase and Land Title Information Appendix E-1: Offer to Purchase and Land Titles

ENCLOSURES Enclosure 1: Siting Investigation Report Proposed Sulphur Forming and Storage Facilty, Komex International Ltd., July 2005. Enclosure 2: An Assessment of Air Quality Impacts Associated with Operations at the Proposed Bruderheim Sulphur Forming Facility, DM Leahey & Associates Ltd. and Jacques Whitford, August 31, 2005.

Page ii

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION


1.1 1.2 DATE OF APPLICATION: NAME OF APPLICANT: October 19, 2005 Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. (a division of Hazco Environmental Services Ltd.) Corey Higham, M.Eng., P.Geo. Sr. Environmental & Regulatory Planner 24th Floor Watermark Tower 530 8th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8 (403) 231-8425 (403) 261-5612 Alberta Sulphur Terminal 35-055-20 W4M Sulphur Forming and Pastille Storage Facility

1.3

CONTACT PERSON:

1.4

ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:

1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10

TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: NAME OF FACILITY: LOCATION OF FACILITY: PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: CORPORATE INFORMATION:

The proposed project will be entirely funded and completed by the HAZCO division of CCS Income Trust. HAZCO is an industry leader providing a wide-range of specialized services including: Sulphur Services, Site Remediation, Decommissioning, Waste Services, Environmental Construction, Environmental Technologies, Emergency Response and Other Specialty Services. HAZCO operates a network of industrial landfills, bioremediation facilities and hazardous waste transfer stations that span Western Canada. HAZCO also provides services throughout Canada, Peru and select services in the United States and other international markets. HAZCO was incorporated in 1989 and has operated as a private company until being purchased in the fall of 2004 by CCS Income Trust. More information is available at our web site www.hazco.com or the CCS Income Trust web site at www.ccsincometrust.com. CCS Income Trust services the global energy and environment sectors through three other major divisions; CCS Energy Services, CCS Energy Marketing, and Concord Well Servicing.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 1 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 2: FACILITY OVERVIEW & RATIONALE


2.1 FACILITY OVERVIEW

Sulphur, a byproduct of the oil and gas industry, is primarily used in the production of fertilizer world wide. With increased activity in the heavy oil sector producing resulting in more produced sulphur, combined with an increase in demand for sulphur exports worldwide, there is a shortage of sulphur forming capacity in Alberta. The sulphur is produced during oil and gas production and refining in Alberta in a molten form, manufactured in to a dry product (i.e. sulphur pellets) for handling, loaded to rail car for transport to Vancouver, stockpiled and eventually loaded on ships for further delivery to export markets. The proposed project includes facilities for sulphur forming, sulphur pastille storage and shipping. At this time, HAZCO has no plans to provide for emergency inventory storage (i.e. sulphur block) at this location. Therefore, molten sulphur and dry formed product will be the only sulphur storage methods employed at this site. In terms of operations, molten sulphur will be received by one of three methods, pipeline, rail tank car or truck. The sulphur will be stored in tanks before being pumped to the forming process. Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. plans to use an environmental friendly technology provided by Sandvik Process Systems to process the liquid sulphur into a formed product (i.e. pastilles) suitable for export. The product will be stored on engineered storage pads and when volumes dictate loaded to rail car unit trains. The volumes of liquid and dry storage will be dependant on market demand for our services and will also grow with demand. All sulphur received at the facility remains the sole responsibility of major oil and gas companies. The purpose of the proposed facility is to provide a service in the form of sulphur receiving, forming, and shipping by rail. 2.2 FACILITY MARKET ANALYSIS

Alberta Sulphur Terminal (AST) will service oil and gas production and refining operations within three main areas: Fort Saskatchewan, Fort McMurray and Lloydminster. With increased applications, approvals and operation of bitumen upgraders and ongoing sulphur recovery initiatives, there is a shortage of sulphur forming facilities in Alberta. The AST will provide area oil and gas producers with a state of the art sulphur forming, storage and export facility that will include design elements and monitoring programs that focus on environmental protection. Responding to the level of oil and gas production and refining operations in Alberta and the future reliance on heavy oil to replace conventional reserves, the HAZCO Business Development Team has identified the need for a facility in the area based on industry requests and necessity. The existing and future oil and gas activity, specifically heavy oil and oilsands development will provide a strong demand for the services that the proposed facility would offer.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 2 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

The following sulphur production, supply and demand information has been obtained from the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board1. In 2003, Alberta produced 6.8x106 t of sulphur, of which 5.7 106 t was derived from sour gas, 1.1x106 t from upgrading of bitumen to synthetic crude oil, and just 20 thousand (103) t from oil refining. Sulphur production from these sources is depicted in Figure 2.1.

Source: EUB, 20041

Figure 2.1 Sources of Alberta Sulphur Production While sulphur production from sour gas is expected to decrease from 5.7x106 t in 2003 to 5.1x106 t, or some 11 per cent, sulphur recovery in bitumen upgrading industry is expected to increase to 3.2x106 t from 1.1x106 by the end of the forecast period. The Alberta refineries are also expected to replace conventional crude and synthetic crude with bitumen as integration of bitumen upgrading and refining takes place in this forecast period. With this integration, the sulphur recovery will increase from 20x103 t in 2003 to 49x103 t by 2013. Total sulphur production is expected to reach 8.4x106 t by the end of forecast period (EUB, 2004). According to the EUB, demand for sulphur within the province in 2003 was only about 250x103 t. It was used in production of phosphate fertilizer and kraft pulp and in other chemical operations. Some 97 per cent of the sulphur marketed by Alberta producers was shipped outside the province, primarily to United States, Asia Pacific, and North Africa. In the early 1990s, a number of traditionally sulphur-importing countries installed sulphurrecovery equipment in oil refineries and other sulphur-emitting facilities, largely for environmental reasons. Consequently, many of these countries became self-sufficient in sulphur
Alberta Energy & Utilities Board. 2004. Albertas Reserves 2003 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2004-2013. Statistical Series 2004-98. Calgary, Alberta. 136pp.
1

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 3 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

and the price declined significantly. Under such low price conditions, many of Albertas competitors ceased production of sulphur, enabling Albertas market share to rise throughout the late 1990s. In 2002 and 2003, China increased its sulphur imports from Canada substantially. Increased global demand for sulphur resulted in a major price change, from Cdn$16/t in 2001 to $40/t in 2003. As of July 4, 2005, sulphur is being marketed at an approximate price of Cdn$60/t. The export demand for sulphur is expected to increase over the next few years. Demand for Alberta sulphur, both domestic and export, is expected to rise slowly, reaching 7.5x106 t per year by the end of the forecast period. Figure 2.2 depicts the Alberta demand and sulphur removal.

Source: EUB, 20042

Figure 2.2 Sulphur Demand and Supply in Alberta Based on current market information from oil and gas producers in the region, AST expects to process, form and export approximately 9.0x105 t of sulphur annually. Actual quantities of sulphur received will vary with market fluctuations, based primarily on oil and gas production levels. The technical, environmental, and economic benefit of building a new Sulphur Forming and Dry Product Storage facility are as follows: Technical: AST and its team of engineers, contractors and consultants have extensive experience in constructing and operating sulphur forming and dry storage facilities. As a result, AST brings expert knowledge and equipment to Lamont County and Albertas Industrial
Alberta Energy & Utilities Board. 2004. Albertas Reserves 2003 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2004-2013. Statistical Series 2004-98. Calgary, Alberta. 136pp.
2

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 4 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

Heartland to safely and effectively manage sulphur produced from oil and gas production and refining/upgrading operations. The HAZCO Division currently owns/operates 14 industrial landfills within Western Canada and the CCS Energy Services Division owns and operates 16 Treatment, Recovery and Disposal Facilities servicing the oil and gas industry demonstrating our capabilities to own/operate a facility of this nature safely and responsibly. A preliminary schedule for the project is provided in Appendix A-1. Environmental: The general soil stratigraphy encountered at the site consists of surficial topsoil and/or fill overlying silty sand and/or glacial clay till deposits underlain by weak sedimentary bedrock. Silt clay overburden at the site had low hydraulic conductivity values ranging between 2.2E-09 and 4.4E-09 cm/s and the vertical hydraulic gradient is also low which is significant as this decreases the potential for downward migration of potential contamination(i.e. soil pH impacts). The existing groundwater quality at the site indicates that natural buffering capacity exists. The favourable site conditions will be further complimented by the proposed facility design that makes use of double liner systems, and run-off control systems as well as environmental monitoring programs and sound facility operation. Economic: During facility construction, the local regional economy will benefit as a result of the work force. Construction activities over the proposed nine month period are expected to employ approximately 36,000 man-hours. Facility operations are expected to add approximately 40,500 man-hours annually to the regional economy (~20 full-time positions). Preliminary cost estimates suggest the development would involve capital spending of approximately $30 million dollars (CDN).

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 5 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 3: SITING & FACILITY DESIGN


3.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The sulphur forming component of the proposed facility includes: Rail and road access for receiving and shipping sulphur; Sulphur unloading and transfer facilities; Sulphur forming facilities to produce sulphur pastilles; and, Loading and shipping facilities for formed sulphur. An overall site plan indicating the facility layout and surrounding area is included in Appendix B-1. In addition, a topographic map of Sec. 35-55-20 W4M is also provided in Appendix B-2. 3.2 SITING INFORMATION

Prior to selecting a site for the proposed AST, a set of technical criteria and criteria specific to AST were developed that would assist in finding a potential facility location. Those criteria are listed below: Proximity to market area. Suitable access (i.e. proximity to high grade road capable of supporting heavy haul truck traffic). Local rail access (i.e. Dual access to both CPR and CNR). Low residential density. Topographical restraints (i.e. no excessive slopes, no drainage problems, etc). Site Geology and Hydrogeology Surface / Sub-surface Features (i.e. wellsites, pipelines, utilities, etc.). Not included in the Listing of Significant Historical Sites and Areas produced by Alberta Community Development. Opportunity to purchase land (i.e. for sale). Industrial Zoning AST retained Komex International Ltd. (Komex) to complete a siting investigation for a proposed sulphur forming and pastille storage facility located in section 35-55-20 W4M (the Site). A copy of the siting investigation for the Site completed by Komex is provided as an enclosure to the submission. The purpose of the siting investigation was to assess the hydrogeological and geotechnical suitability of the Site for the proposed development; to provide initial hydrogeological and geotechnical design recommendations; and provide a proposed soil, groundwater and surface water monitoring program. Based on this program, the site is suitable for siting the proposed sulphur facilities. The results of the investigation are summarized as follows: The soil stratigraphy generally consisted of surficial topsoil and/or fill overlying silty sand, clay and/or glacial clay till deposits underlain by weak sedimentary bedrock that extended beyond the completion depth of the boreholes.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 6 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

The surficial geology on the Site was variable both in composition and thickness. Although, till or till-like clay was encountered in most boreholes, the till was silty and/or contained High-plastic clay, silty sand and/or sand seams. Samples submitted for calcium carbonate equivalent analysis indicate that the soil has a natural buffering capacity capable of buffering minor depressed pH levels. Fill was encountered across the Site at depths ranging between 0.5 and 2.5 meters below ground surface. The fill varied in composition and consistency and is not considered suitable to support shallow foundations or concrete slabs-on-grade. Structures are recommended to be supported by pile foundation systems. All existing fill material within building envelopes or paved sections should be over excavated and replaced with a suitable engineered fill. The native silty clay deposits encountered at the Site are highly plastic and susceptible to swelling or shrinkage due to moisture changes. Exposure of the high plastic clay should be minimized, and therefore, deep cast-in-place concrete piles are considered the most suitable foundation system to support structures. Laboratory permeability tests showed that there likely is clay on-site suitable for a compacted clay liner. The measured depth to groundwater in the A series monitoring wells, which were completed in the Quaternary materials, ranged from 0.14 to 2.64 meters below ground surface (mbgs). The measured depth to groundwater in the B series monitoring wells, which were completed in the bedrock, ranged from flowing (greater than 0.66 meters above ground surface) to 2.65 mbgs. Very low upward and downward vertical hydraulic gradients were observed. This indicates a decreased potential for downward migration of contaminants, and a potential for added natural hydraulic containment of the engineered containment area. Hydraulic conductivity testing of the overburden monitoring wells showed two orders of magnitude difference between monitoring wells screened within predominantly clay soils and predominantly silty sand or sand (2.3 x 10-8 to 3.0 x 10-6 m/s). Similar results were found with the bedrock wells completed within the deeper clay shale and the sandstone (4.6 x 10-9 to 6.6 x 10-6 m/s). Estimates of the shallow and bedrock groundwater flow velocity were in the order of 0.5 m/yr. The groundwater flow direction calculated from both the shallow and the bedrock monitoring wells was inferred to be to the northeast. Based on the two-hour pumping test an estimated yield of 7.9 L/min (1.7 igpm) was calculated within what appeared to be the highest yielding groundwater zone. Based on the variable geology, diminished yield could occur over time. Hydrochemistry of groundwater measured on the Site showed that the groundwater is predominantly sodium-bicarbonate. Therefore, the addition of acidity would be naturally buffered. Baseline groundwater at the Site indicates that the total dissolved solids, dissolved sulphate, dissolved sodium and/or dissolved manganese concentrations in all or some of the monitoring wells exceeded the Health Canada (2004) Drinking Water Aesthetic Objective Guidelines The dissolved aluminum concentration in monitoring well 05-01B

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 7 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

also exceeded the Health Canada (2004) Drinking Water Maximum Allowable Concentration Guideline. Both the potability and dissolved metals results are not considered to be a design issue in the context of the proposed development. The surficial geology and bedrock, coupled with the hydrochemical type and hydraulic conductivity measurements of the first clay shale layer, indicate that the overburden groundwater is somewhat hydraulically connected to the more shallow bedrock groundwater. However, groundwater from approximately 45 m and deeper, appears to be protected by a thick, competent shale unit. The proposed facilities are within a lower lying area of the Site, adjacent to two field verified drainage courses. Surface grading and contouring will be required to ensure that drainage is directed away from the facilities. Groundwater is near surface in most locations drilled on the Site, and may be encountered during construction of the facility. Groundwater control measures may have to be implemented during construction and potentially during operation of the facility. The engineered containment design may have to include an under-drain system to keep the leachate collection system free of groundwater. If both of these layers are relatively free of groundwater, the compacted clay liner could remain saturated, and therefore provide natural hydraulic containment. Although the overburden groundwater appears to be somewhat hydraulically connected to the more shallow bedrock groundwater, the proposed engineered containment system if designed and operated properly should be able to minimize any potential groundwater impacts resulting from the operation of the facility.

Based on the siting criteria listed above and the siting investigation, the section of land located at 35-055-20 W4M was considered suitable as it satisfied the requirements of the proposed facility. As a result, the proposed site was determined to meet relevant AENV and CCS siting criteria and was also found to be available for purchase. The proposed site at Sec. 35-055-20 W4M met all applicable siting criteria and was selected for development. 3.3 FACILITY DESIGN

For the purpose of this Project, AST has chosen to utilize a third generation drop forming Sulphur solidification technology from Sandvik Process Systems named Rotoform HS. Each unit has a guaranteed capacity of 12.0 Metric Tonnes per hour. The equipment is modular, in design, flexible, in that any number of machines can be used at any given time, and is an exceptionally clean process without any sulphur contact with water, steam, air surges during the forming process. The elimination of direct contact with water, steam or air currents as the forming medium effectively addresses major environmental concerns, namely fugitive gas, and dust emissions as well as water contamination. It also does not require specialized personal protective equipment including artificial breathing air or confined space entry. A detailed Process Flow Diagram is provided in Appendix C-1.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 8 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

The molten sulphur to be received at the proposed facility will arrive by either pipeline, rail car or truck and only sulphur that has been degassed to a maximum of 10 ppm H2S will be received. Upon arrival at the facility, the pipeline or tankers will unload via a pumping station into insulated and heated tanks (T-101 T106), each having a holding capacity of 750 metric tonnes of molten sulphur. All storage areas will meet the requirements of the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Guide 55 and the storage tanks will be vented to atmosphere. Molten sulphur is pumped from receiving tanks to a feed tank (T108). The Sulphur is then pumped from the feed tank to a duplex filter (V102), then, from the filter sulphur passes through a conditioning unit (E101) which cools the sulphur to 125C. The product then enters a recirculation loop which feeds the Rotoform HS Drop forming equipment (RF101 RF109). The product then travels through the in feed adaptor through a stator bar and into a metering bar. From the metering bar it travels through specially designed nozzles and passages in the metering bar which ensure even product distribution across a rotating stainless steel belt. The belt is cooled by cold water sprayed against the under side of the rotating belt causing the pastilles on the top of the belt to cool and solidify. The water utilized by the Rotoform HS is sent through a cooling tower (CT101) in a closed loop for filtration and temperature reduction. Make up water for the cooling tower is supplied from the run off pond (S101) which is designed to collect and treat surface water from the site and also serves as the source of fire protection water. Details of the fire protection system in place at the facility can be provided upon request. A more detailed description of the pastillation technology (including equipment specifications) can be found as an enclosure to the submission. In addition, a copy of the manufacturers information video is also provided with the submission. The solid pastilles fall onto a collection conveyor (CV101) and moved outside the production building where they are transferred to a radial stacking conveyor (CV102) and onto an asphalt bulk sulphur pastille storage pad. Sulphur pad design details are provided in Appendix C-2 in Drawing No. 085433-5901-003. Dust suppression on the sulphur pastille storage pad, transfer points and rail load-out area will be completed with a proprietary dust suppression agent, Dustbind S3 and the proprietary sulphur release aid, IPAC SRB+. The Dustbind S3 will be applied to 2565 metric tonnes per day at a usage of 76.95 Kg (75.45L) per day. Water usages will range from 6,000 L to 7,545 L at 80 to 100 - 1. These dosages will be applied at the transfer points behind the hopper and at the train load-out. The amounts used will depend on the size of the trains being loaded and the conveyor size. Dust suppression will also be applied before the stockpile to suppress dust in the loading of the sulphur. Dust suppression will also be applied as needed. IPAC SRB+ will be applied from a makedown tank via a pump supplying each individual rotoformer. Usage should be approximately 29.4 mL per metric tonne. Copies of the product data sheets fro Dustbind S3 and IPAC SRB+ are provided in Appendix C-3. Dust suppression equipment will include an assembly of a metering pump, capable of delivering a maximum of 102 mL/minute at 150 psi; 2 camlock, draw down tube and stainless steel pump hanger.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 9 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

Hazco will initially utilize a front end loader to retrieve product from the stockpile. The product will be discharged from the front end loader to a surge bin that is equipped with a dust suppression package described above. The dust treated product is then deposited on a load out conveyor (CV103) equipped with a Weighveyor / Totalizer and on to rail or trucks for shipment from the proposed facility. Based on the facility design, an air quality assessment and air modeling study was completed by DM Leahey & Associates and Jaqcues Whitford. The study concluded that air emissions associated with the proposed facility should have no effect on the environment or surrounding area. A copy of the Air Quality assessment report is included as an enclosure. All surface water that comes in contact with the sulphur handling and pastille storage areas will be collected and stored within a surface water run-off pond. Design details for the surface water run-off pond and ditching details are provided on the design drawings provided in Appendix C-4. 3.4 FACILITY OPERATION

Prior to facility start-up, a copy of the proposed operating procedure manual for the AST can be provided to Alberta Environment upon request. 3.5 PROPOSED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION

Proposed date of construction commencement: April 1, 2006 Proposed date of operational commencement: December 1, 2006 3.6 OTHER APPROVALS

Since the proposed Sulphur Management Facility does not fall under either mandatory or exempted activities as listed in Alberta Regulation 111/93 Environmental Assessment (Mandatory and Exempted Activities) Regulation no formal review of the proposed project has been completed under the environmental assessment process. AST believes that an environmental impact assessment is not required for this project due to the nature of the operation (i.e. sulphur forming and pastille storage). AST is not aware of any prior requirements within Alberta for environmental impact assessments for greenfield sulphur management facilities. No other approvals have been issued or applied for under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act or Water Act or its predecessor or any temporary field approvals issued under section 19(1)(c) of the Public Lands Act. Potable and makeup water required for the facility will be supplied by Lamont Countys Water Cooperative.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 10 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

No other approvals from a regulatory agency (i.e. Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, etc.) exist for the proposed facility/location. Municipal approvals required for the facility are outlined in Section 7.0. Alberta Transportation has been contacted with respect to the Highway 15 and Highway 45 access points associated with the proposed facility. AST will forward the Alberta Transportation approvals once they are received.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 11 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS


4.1 4.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES Sulphur Pastille Storage Area

The sulphur pastille storage area has the following environmental protection measures incorporated into its design (Appendix C-2, Drawing No. 0854333-5901-0003): Sloped containment pad for surface water run-off collection; 150mm thick asphalt primary containment liner and working surface; 300mm clay secondary containment liner (specifications can be forwarded to Alberta Environment upon request); and, Prepared sub-grade. 4.1.2 Surface Water Run-on and Surface Run-off Controls

The surface water run-off and run-off control systems have the following environmental protection measures incorporated into its design (Appendix C-5, Drawing No. 0854333-59010001): 4.1.3 Areas surrounding the sulphur handling areas will be sloped away from the facility to prevent surface water run-on; Lined ditching systems on the pastille storage area; 60mil HDPE liner within surface water run-off pond; Geotextile or 100mm sandy clay and prepared sub-grade; and, Capacity of 10,960m3. Dust Suppression Measures

Dust suppression will be completed on the sulphur pastille storage pad, transfer points and rail load-out area using proprietary dust suppression agents, Dustbind S3 and the proprietary sulphur release aid, IPAC SRB+. The storage pad and rail-load out area may be surrounded by wind screens to mitigate any airborne sulphur particulate. Based on the results of a dust modeling study, the need for dust screens will then be evaluated. A copy of the Air modeling results will be forwarded to Alberta Environment upon completion. 4.1.4 Sound Operation and Environmental Monitoring

The facility will be operated by qualified professionals and a copy of the facilitys Operations Plan can be provided to Alberta Environment upon request. The environmental monitoring programs proposed for the site are described within Section 4.3 of the application document. 4.1.5 Soil Liming

Due to fugitive emissions from the sulphur handling areas (i.e. elemental sulphur dust), a soil monitoring program will also be put in place to characterize the sulphur impact on soil

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 12 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

surrounding the facility. Based on a similar facility operating near Sundre, Alberta, dust impacts will likely be present within a 150-200m radius surrounding the facility. To mitigate the dust impacts, a soil liming program will be completed to neutralize the impacts associated with the sulphur dust. The Alberta Environment Air Monitoring Directive requires that all operators that handle solid sulphur establish an approved soil monitoring program. 4.2 WASTE MINIMIZATION

Based on the facility design and operation, AST is striving to be a zero discharge facility with respect facility operations and wastes. The facility has been designed to produce almost no wastes (other than air emissions). All dust that is collected at the site will be recycled and placed back in the sulphur feed tanks to be formed in the process. During operations, there may potentially be some waste or contaminated sulphur (i.e will not meet saleable product specifications) collected as part of equipment maintenance and on-going operations. It is anticipated if any waste sulphur is collected, no more than 1m3 of waste sulphur will be collected during a months operation and will be disposed at an appropriate facility (i.e. Class II Landfill). The waste sulphur will be stored separately on the sulphur storage pad to take advantage of the containment measures incorporated into the design. In addition to the zero-discharge facility, AST has no plans to discharge any of the surface water run-off collected in the surface water pond as the pond will be used as a source of water for process make-up water requirements and the fire suppression system. In the event where water from the surface water pond needs to be released due to capacity restraints (likely due to excessive precipitation events), the water will be sampled and analyzed to confirm the surface water pond water quality meets applicable surface water quality guidelines. All domestic garbage will be disposed at an authorized municipal solid waste landfill. To minimize domestic wastes generated at the site, a recycling program will be employed at the facility to collect plastics, cardboard and beverage containers. Domestic wastewaters generated at the site will be collected in a septic tank and subsequently hauled off-site for disposal. 4.3 MONITORING & REPORTING

Monitoring programs during the operation of the proposed sulphur handling and pastille storage facility are planned for soil, groundwater, surface water, and air quality. The siting investigation report completed by Komex (Enclosure 1) outlines the proposed soil, groundwater and surface water monitoring programs. The proposed air quality monitoring program has been provided as an enclosure to this application. The following proposed monitoring programs have been designed to comply with the conditions outlined for soil, groundwater and surface monitoring as typically required under the Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (AEPEA) approvals. The sampling areas are based on the current design plans (Appendix B-1) for the facility. Should the facility change in any way (i.e. design, capacity, location, components, etc.) the monitoring programs would be re-evaluated.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 13 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

4.4

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS & CONTINGENCY PLANS

Contents of the AST Emergency Response Plan have not yet been finalized as the ERP is still under development. Upon completion of a draft plan, copies will be forwarded to Town of Bruderheim, Town of Lamont, Lamont County, Northeast Region Community Awareness and Emergency Response Group, local industry representatives and Local Emergency Response officials for comment. Upon receipt of the comments, a final ERP will be developed and filed with all stakeholders mentioned above prior to commencement of operations. 4.5 CLOSURE AND RECLAMATION PLAN

Prior to closure of the proposed facility, a decommissioning plan will be prepared and submitted to Alberta Environment for approval. Contents of the decommissioning plan will include the following: 1. A plan for dismantling the plant; 2. A plan to manage all wastes produced during decommissioning of the plant; 3. A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment completed to determine the nature, degree and extent of soil and groundwater impacts (if present) at the plant and surrounding area; 4. A Remediation Plan (if required) to evaluate and outline remediation technologies to be used at the plant and surrounding area; 5. A Reclamation Plan that outline the intended land use, soil replacement information, drainage restoration, erosion control measures, revegetation plan and schedule. In terms of soil conservation at the site, topsoil and subsoil will be stockpile at the site to be used for final reclamation and soil replacement. The subsoil will spread over the reclaimed site followed by the topsoil layer. The topsoil will be replaced in sufficient thickness to allow the establishment of vegetation.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 14 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 5: PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROGRAM


5.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

The public consultation program conducted by AST included the following: 1. Identifying residents - The proposed site is located within an area of the County that has a low density of residences. There are only 6 residences within 1.0km of the site with the closest located approximately 600m to the east. 2. Personal meetings - Personal meetings were held with nearby landowners, residents, industry, Lamont County, Alberta Industrial Heartland officials and Alberta Environment representatives. 3. Open House - The purpose of Open House was to discuss the project with all interested parties on Tuesday, June 28, 2005 between 6:00pm and 8:00pm at the Bruderheim Memorial Hall. Invitations to the Open House were mailed to landowners, residents, government representatives and companies within the area. The Project Open House was advertised in the Redwater Review on June 14 and 21, 2005, respectively. Copies of the tear sheets are provided in Appendix D-1. 4. Ongoing Communication Due to concerns from area residents and the subsequent formation of the Friends of Lamont County for Responsible Industrial and Community Development, Hazco has continued discussions with all project stakeholders to inform and supply stakeholders with accurate information regarding the proposed project. 5.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION DETAILS

CCS initiated the public consultation process by contacting and meeting with landowners/residents/occupants located within a 1.6 km radius of the site (a listing of landowners/residents is included in Appendix D-2). The details of the proposed AST were discussed, an information package was provided, and CCS committed to sending an invitation to the open house (date not set at the time of the initial visit) to each person contacted. An open house was held on June 28, 2005 in Bruderheim, Alberta as a component of the public consultation program. Sixty-three (63) people attended the open house. A copy of the open house sign-in sheets are included in Appendix D-3. A copy of the open house presentation boards are included in Appendix D-4. Public feedback to the proposed development has been mixed. There have been some concerns raised and requests for additional information related to the proposed facility have been noted. CCS is committed to working with interested parties to satisfy any concerns that they may have. Complete consultation details are included in the 1.6 km Stakeholder Listing included in Appendix D-2. Issues raised have been primarily related to groundwater protection, air quality and sulphur dust, impacts to property values in the area and nearby industrial facility safety.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 15 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

Copies of correspondence sent to residents and project stakeholders requesting additional information are provided as Appendix D-5. In addition to the individual correspondence sent out, Hazco completed a general mail-out to Lamont County to provide project stakeholders with additional information. This information can be viewed on the Hazco website at www.hazcoenv.com in the Hazco News page under Alberta Sulphur Terminals. CCS will continue to update Alberta Environment as to the status of the public consultation program. A copy of the information package delivered to all landowners, residents and occupants within a 2 km of the proposed site is included in Appendix D-6. The information package was also available to all attendees of the open house held June 28, 2005.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 16 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 6: LEGAL AND MUNICIPAL INFORMATION


6.1 CONFIRMATION OF LEGAL CONTROL OF THE SITE

The proposed site is currently owned by Encana Corporation of Calgary, AB. AST has entered into an Offer to Purchase and Interim Agreement, dated November 27, 2004, conditional upon receiving all approvals to construct and operate the AST. A copy of the land title search and the Offer to Purchase are included in Appendix E. 6.2 MUNICIPAL PLANNING & ZONING

The land use designation of the site located at 35-055-20 W4M is Industrial/Commercial under the County of Lamont zoning bylaws. Section 35 is one of four contiguous sections of land that are zoned industrial in the area. Sections of land to the south (25, 26-055-20 W4M) and west (24-055-20 W4M) of 35-055-20 W4M are also zoned Industrial/Commercial and are included as part of Albertas Industrial Heartland. Land use in the area is predominantly still agricultural with the exception to the immediate west and south of the site where Erco Worldwide and Nexen Chemicals operate sodium chlorate production facilities and Triton Energy operates a fabrication shop, respectively. The proposed site is located within an area of the County that has a low density of residences. There are only 6 residences located within 1.0 km of the site located in 35-055-20W4M. CCS does not expect these residences to be effected by the proposed development due to the design, operation and monitoring of the facility. 6.3 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

AST has submitted an application for a development permit with the County of Lamont in August 2005. AST expects a development permit to be issued upon satisfying Lamont Countys information request. A copy of the development permit will be forwarded to Alberta Environment upon receipt from the County.

OCTOBER 2005

PAGE 17 OF 18

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

SECTION 7: CLOSING REMARKS:


CCS Income Trust and it group of divisions have been providing environmentally responsible management solutions to the upstream oil and gas industry for over 20 years. We feel that the addition of the AST Bruderheim Sulphur Forming and Pastille Storage Facility will fulfill the requirements of the upstream oil and gas industry for sulphur management in Alberta. I trust that the information provided in this application is complete. If you have any questions or comments related to the application, please feel free to reach Mr. Corey Higham at the contact numbers provided on page 1 of the application.

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX A PROJECT SCHEDULE

Act ID

Description

Dura -tion

Early Start

Early Finish

2005 A S

JAN

2006 JUL

20 J

0895 0900 0910 1000 1005 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130

Survey & Geotechnical Commence Regulatory Permitting Public Consultation Letter of Intent Negotiate Contracts Process P & ID's Mechanical / Equipment Piping Civil / Structural Instrumentation Electrical Bid & Purchase Major Equipment Bid & Purchase Balance of Equipment Field Move-In Permit to Construct Construction Site Work Construction Start-Up

44 02MAY05 * 30JUN05 22 15JUN05 97 01JUN05 0 30JUN05 65 01JUL05 53 01JUN05 172 01JUL05 132 01AUG05 163 15JUL05 152 01JUL05 195 01JUL05 66 01AUG05 65 01SEP05 20 03APR06 0 20 03APR06 142 01MAY06 22 15NOV06 30SEP05 15AUG05 28FEB06 31JAN06 28FEB06 31JAN06 31MAR06 31OCT05 30NOV05 28APR06 31OCT05 28APR06 15NOV06 30NOV06 15JUL05 14OCT05

ATHABASCA OIL SANDS MERCHANT SULPHUR FORMING FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY SCHEDULE

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX B SITE MAPPING

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX B-1 SITE PLAN

P:\085433\4903 PLOT-KEY\085433-4903-0001-RD.dwg, 10/17/2005 4:38:05 PM, jankowskil, STN-0411

U U

P A S U H R L B T S E M I N D . R A L T

ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

P:\085433\4903 PLOT-KEY\085433-4903-0003-RA.dwg, 10/3/2005 9:23:29 AM, jankowskil, STN-0411

ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX B-2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SEC. 35-055-20 W4M

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX C FACILITY DESIGN

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX C-1 FACILITY PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

P:\085433\4901 PFD\085433-4901-0002.dwg, 7/26/2005 10:50:09 AM, jankowskil, STN-0411

ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX C-2 SULPHUR STORAGE PAD PLAN & DETAILS (DRAWING NO. 085433-5901-0003)

N:\085433\085432-5901-0003REVB.dwg, 9/28/2005 10:45:07 AM, xies

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX C-3 DUST SUPPRESSION PRODUCT DATA SHEETS

Product Data Sheet


IPAC DUSTBIND S3
WATER-BASED SULPHUR DUST SUPPRESSANT

Description and Uses


IPAC Dustbind S3 is a specially formulated dust suppression agent, free of nonylphenols, developed to provide immediate and long-term dust control on a variety of sulphur forms and high fines content material. Field trials in commercial applications of IPAC Dustbind S3 have confirmed that simple atomized spray applications provide sufficient chemical coverage to effectively control dust, thus eliminating large capital investment and service requirements inherent to aerated foam application systems. IPAC Dustbind S3 contains a component which is selective to sulphur surfaces and upon drying remains a viscous, agglomerative liquid, thus remaining effective for extended periods of time. Impurity specifications set by Alberta Sulphur Research Ltd. have been met or exceeded.

Typical Properties
Appearance ............................................................................................................................Clear liquid pH ................................................................................................................................................8 1.5 Specific Gravity .................................................................................................................................1.02 Viscosity .......................................................................................................................................50 cPs Freezing Point ...................................................................................................................................0C Freeze-Thaw Stability......................................................................................... Complete with agitation Solubility in Water............................................................................................................................ Good Shelf Life....................................................................................................................................... 2 years

Application
IPAC Dustbind S3 should be diluted with water in the ratio of 80 to 100 to 1, depending on the need. The dilution can be achieved either via in-line static mixing or in a bulk tank with agitation. Complete dissolution will be evident when the solution is clear. For further application information, please contact your IPAC representative.

Shipping and Handling


IPAC Dustbind S3 is supplied in 200 L drums or 1000 L tote bins. Bulk delivery to an on-site storage tank is also available. Do not store near excessive heat. Do not freeze.

Quality
Products are manufactured under ISO standards.

Regulatory Status
TDGA: WHMIS: Not Regulated D2B

2001/12/01

IPAC Chemicals Ltd., 1620 West 75th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. V6P 6G2

Phone: (604) 261-3019

The information given and the recommendations made herein are based on our research and are believed to be accurate but no guarantee of their accuracy is made. In every case we urge and recommend that purchasers test the product for their particular purpose under their own operating conditions. The products discussed herein are sold without any warranty as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied. No representative of ours has any authority to waive or change the foregoing provisions but, subject to such provisions, our engineers are available to assist purchasers in adapting our products to their needs and to the circumstances prevailing in their business. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to imply the nonexistence of any relevant patents or to constitute a permission, inducement or recommendation to practice any invention covered by any patent, without authority from the owner of the patent.

Product Data Sheet


IPAC SRB PLUS
SULPHUR RELEASE AID

Description and Uses


IPAC SRB PLUS is a specially formulated product which combines surfactant blends for improved formation and release of the sulphur with a preservative to inhibit the growth of thiobacilli, which is responsible for acid generation and corrosion problems during the storage and transportation of sulphur. IPAC SRB PLUS is water-based, readily soluble in water, easy to handle and safe. IPAC SRB PLUS is very stable and can be reused in operations such as Sandvik or similar forming equipment where recycling of release aid is necessary. IPAC SRB PLUS can reduce the amount of water used in an operation by up to 80%, and since it is effective at low concentrations, the high purity level of the sulphur is always maintained.

Typical Properties
Appearance ........................................................................................................................Opaque liquid pH ....................................................................................................................................................6 - 8 Specific Gravity ...................................................................................................................................1.0 Viscosity .......................................................................................................................................20 cPs Freezing Point ..................................................................................................................................-2C Solubility in Water..................................................................................................................... Complete Flash Point (COC) ..........................................................................................................................>93C

Application
IPAC SRB PLUS can be either diluted in-line with 20 to 100 parts water, passed through a static mixer and fed as such directly to the forming surface, or dilute product can be prepared in bulk volumes. Ideally for batches, IPAC SRB PLUS should be added to warm water at a point of turbulence and the dilute solution continually mixed with slow sweeping mixing blades to maintain quality. For further application information, please contact your IPAC representative.

Shipping and Handling


IPAC SRB PLUS is available in 205 L drums and 1150 L tote bins. Bulk delivery to an on-site storage tank is also available. Product shelf life is one year.

Quality
Products are manufactured under ISO standards.

Regulatory Status
TDGA: WHMIS: Not regulated Not controlled

2001/12/01

IPAC Chemicals Ltd., 1620 West 75th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. V6P 6G2

Phone: (604) 261-3019

The information given and the recommendations made herein are based on our research and are believed to be accurate but no guarantee of their accuracy is made. In every case we urge and recommend that purchasers test the product for their particular purpose under their own operating conditions. The products discussed herein are sold without any warranty as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied. No representative of ours has any authority to waive or change the foregoing provisions but, subject to such provisions, our engineers are available to assist purchasers in adapting our products to their needs and to the circumstances prevailing in their business. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to imply the nonexistence of any relevant patents or to constitute a permission, inducement or recommendation to practice any invention covered by any patent, without authority from the owner of the patent.

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX C-4 STORM WATER RUN-OFF AND FIRE WATER SUPPLY POND PLAN & DETAILS (DRAWING NO. 085433-5901-0002)

N:\085433\085432-5901-0001REVB.dwg, 9/28/2005 10:44:06 AM, xies

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROGRAM DETAILS

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D-1 OPEN HOUSE NOTIFICATIONS (REDWATER REVIEW)

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D-2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION CONTACT LIST

HAZCO - Bruderheim Sulphur Forming and Temporary Storage Facility 1.6km Stakeholder & Concerned Citizen Listing Around Section 35-55-20-W4M
Legal Description SE 25-55-20-W4M Owner Jerry B. Strand and Rosemary Strand Address Phone 46 McCullough Cresent (403) 342-4190 Red Deer, Alberta T4R 1S7 8538-100th Ave Ft. Saskatchewan,AB T8L 3B5 Box 787 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 4439 50A Ave Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 Box 40 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Comments May 11th - In Montreal, left message Mail out package May 18th - Package sent via courier June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent Concerns None identified.

Marian Investments Ltd.

NE 25-55-20-W4M

Kevin D. Schultz and Brenda M. Schultz

(780) 895-7554 May 11th-Meeting set up for 3:00 on May 17th (780) 940-9832 (cell) June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent July 22/05 - Request for additional information sent. (780) 895-7734 May 11th-Meeting set up for 6:00 on May 17th June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent

Dust, air quality, EIA, Use of land, property values. Requested further information.

NW 25-55-20-W4M

Albert J. Schultz (Farmer) and Audrey Elizabeth Schultz Leslie Howard Sawers and Diane Given Sawers

None identified.

SW 25-55-20-W4M

Stanley Wilten Arndt and Marlene Ruth Arndt

Box 155 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0

SW 26-55-20-W4M

Wesley L. Hauer and Elfrieda Hauer

Box 88th Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0

NW 26-55-20-W4M

Churchill Industrial Group Ltd.

NE 26-55-20-W4M

Stanley Wilten Arndt and Marlene Ruth Arndt

8525 Davies Road Edmonton, AB T6E 4N3 Box 155 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 155 Bruderheim, AB Box 86 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0

(780) 796-3426 May 11th - Spoke with Howard & he will get (780) 203-6382 (cell) Leslie to call me back. send out information package May 18th - Package sent via courier June 2/05 - Invite to open house sent courier June 29 - Invite for open house was not picked up a the Greyhound Depot (780) 796-3802 May 11th - Talked to Stanley He is selling his land to another company and is a little confussed May 12th - Meeting set up 6:00 on May 16th June 2/05 - Invite to open house sent courier (780) 796-2372 May 11th - Send out Information package May 18th - Package sent via courier June2/05 Invite to open house sent courier June 28 - Information package & Invite to open house was not picked up at the Greyhound Depot Bought out from Triton Energy June 3 - Package dropped off @ Fabrication Shop (780) 796-3802 May 11th - Attended the county meeting He feels very informed. June 2/05 - Info to open house sent courier

None identified.

Supports local industrial development and the project.

No concerns identified.

No concerns identified.

Supports the project.

Warren Stanley Arndt SE 26-55-20-W4M Francis Kenneth Cholak

(780) 405-5578 (780) 796-2108 May 11th - Mail package Runs Organic Cattle Operation, is opposed Father recently passed on Met on May 17 at 1:00 May 18th - Package sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier Cattle heatlh. No further information requested.

Page 1 of 5

HAZCO - Bruderheim Sulphur Forming and Temporary Storage Facility 1.6km Stakeholder & Concerned Citizen Listing Around Section 35-55-20-W4M
Legal Description SE 27-55-20-W4M Owner Theodore William James Frauenfeld Bruce Gregory Frauenfeld Address 304, 10634-80 Ave Edmonton, AB T6E 1V5 Box 261 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 **ADDRESS** Bruderheim, AB **POSTAL CODE** Phone Comments May 11th - Lives in city Brother to Bruce June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via mail May 11th - Mail package (x2) Bruce is the one who looks after the land May 18th - Packages sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent courier May 11th - Passed away son lives on farm Kevin Hauer Box 368th Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 (780) 796-2473 May 12th - Left message May 24-Package sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent courier June 29 - Invite for open house was not picked up at the Greyhound Depot May 11th-Meeting set up for 2:00 on May 17th June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 11th - Left message May 12th - No answer June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 11th - Left message May 12th - Meeting set up at 9:00 on May 17th June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 11th - Mail out package May 18th - Packages sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 12th - Left message with land department looking for contact name both companies via courier Concerns No concerns identified.

(780) 796-3525

NE 27-55-20-W4M

Emil T. Hauer

No concerns identified.

NW 27-55-20-W4M

Herbert E. Rinas and Audrey G. Rinas Barry Ward Schram

SW 27-55-20-W4M

Edward William Schram

SW 34-55-20-W4M

Glen Fibke and Sarah Fibke Canadian Pacific Limited

NW 34-55-20-W4M

NE 34-55-20-W4M

Superior Plus Inc. c/o Erco Worldwide Attn: Mary Lou McDonald Legal Department Timothy Gustav Bartz

10607-101 Ave Ft. Saskatchewan,AB T8L 1A1 Box 494 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 232 nd Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 PO Box 96 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 205-9th Ave SE Calgary, AB T2P 4Z4 302 The East Mall Toronto, ON M9B 6C7 PO Box 421 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 801, 7th Ave SW Calgary, AB T2P 3P7

(780) 998-1472

Groundwater and air quality No request for additional information. No concerns identified.

(780) 796-2223

(780) 796-3784

No concerns identified.

(780) 998-2700

No concerns identified.

(403) 319-7539

No concerns identified.

(780) 796-3990

May 11th-Meeting set up for 8:00 on May 17th June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 12th - Left message with land department looking for contact person Send out package Attn: Ray MacEachern May 18th - Package sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier June 24 - Spoke with Facility Manager

SE 34-55-20-W4M

Nexen Inc.

(403) 699-4000

Traffic, speed, dust, air quality, groundwater quality. No request for additional information, however, HAZCO to continue to consult with Bartz's. Dust and Emergency Response Plan HAZCO continuing to provide further information.

Page 2 of 5

HAZCO - Bruderheim Sulphur Forming and Temporary Storage Facility 1.6km Stakeholder & Concerned Citizen Listing Around Section 35-55-20-W4M
Legal Description NW 35-55-20-W4M Owner Altalink Management Ltd. Address Box 20, Station 'M' Calgary, AB T2P 2G9 #1200, 10707-100Ave Edmonton, AB **POSTAL CODE** #1200, 10707-100Ave Edmonton, AB **POSTAL CODE** #1200, 10707-100Ave Edmonton, AB **POSTAL CODE** #1200, 10707-100Ave Edmonton, AB **POSTAL CODE** 2900 Rocky Point Dr Tampa, FL USA 33607-1435 Box 553 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 411 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Phone Comments June2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier Concerns No concerns identified.

Alberta Energy Company Ltd.

Facility location

N/A

NE 35-55-20-W4M

Alberta Energy Company Ltd.

Facility location

N/A

SE 35-55-20-W4M

Alberta Energy Company Ltd.

Facility location

N/A

SW 35-55-20-W4M

Alberta Energy Company Ltd.

Facility location

N/A

SE 36-55-20-W4M

Shriners Hospital for Children

SW 36-55-20-W4M

Robert Kottke

(780) 796-3698

NW 36-55-20-W4M

Jason Boon

(780) 796-3918

May 11th - send out package May 18th - Package sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 11th - Meeting Scheduled for 1:00 Met on May 17 at 1:00 June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 11th - Left message May 12th - No answer Met on May 17 at 1:00 June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 18th - Packages sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via mail

No concerns identified.

Air and groundwater quality, aesthetics, land values. No request for additional information. No concerns identified.

Albert Komant and Barbara Komant NE 36-55-20-W4M Marvin Merle Bartz and Elsie Elizabeth Bartz Dennis James McCartney and Mary Grace McCartney Rodger Bartz

NE 1-56-20-W4M

NW 1-56-20-W4M

Box 691 Smokey Lake, AB T0A 3C0 7307-137 Ave Edmonton, AB T5C 2L4 Box 593 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 Box 76 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0

No concerns identified. See Tim Bartz

(780) 475-7972

(780) 895-2651

(780) 796-2327

May 11th - Send out package May 18th - Package sent via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier May 11th - Meeting set up at 7:00 May 17th June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier July 22/05 - Request for additional information sent. May 11th - send out package Dean Bartz is Rodgers son

Facility design, acid rain, water management, fire hazards. Requested additional information. No concerns identified.

SW 1-56-20-W4M

Denis Vanbrabant and Fiona Farrell

General Delivery Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0

May 18th - Package sent out via courier June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier June 29 - Invite for open house was not picked up at the Greyhound Depot May 11th - Robert Koltke has invited them to Air quality, groundwater quality, noise, traffic, property value. attend there 1:00 meeting on May 17th Requested additional information. June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via mail July 22/05 - Request for additional information sent.

Page 3 of 5

HAZCO - Bruderheim Sulphur Forming and Temporary Storage Facility 1.6km Stakeholder & Concerned Citizen Listing Around Section 35-55-20-W4M
Legal Description SW 1-56-20-W4M Owner Canadian Pacific Ltd. Address 205-9th Ave SE Calgary, AB T2P 2Z4 Box 76 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Phone Track through property see page 3 (780) 893-0273 May 11th - Asked to call when in town Met on May 17 at 3:00 June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier June 29 - Invite for open house was not picked up at the Greyhound Depot May 12th - Left message June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier June 29 - Invite for open house was not picked up at the Greyhound Depot May 12 th - Left message Met on May 18 at 9:00. June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier June 13 - Met to further discuss issues May 11th - Left message for Stewart from Ft. Saskatchewan Believe it is his farm May 11th - asked for package to be sent to himself and his sister Ella June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier Ella lives out of the province Roy looks after land May 18th - Packages sent out via courier May 11th - Talked to Rosanna and she will get Met on May 17 At 1:00. June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier June 29 - Invite for open house was not picked up at the Greyhound Depot May 11th - Left message Met on May 17 At 1:00. June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier Arlan (780) 796-3974 call Arlan for Audrey's # June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via mail May 11th - Left message Met on May 17 At 1:00. June 2/05 - sent to Maschmeyer farms June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via mail (780) 796-3764 May 11th - Left message Met on May 17 At 1:00. June 2/05 - Info to open house sent via courier No concerns identified. Comments No concerns identified. Concerns

Dean Bartz

SE 1-56-20-W4M

Douglas Lorne McCartney

SE 2-56-20-W4M

Jeffrey William McNeill and Laura Lynn McNeill

Box 761 Bruderheim, AB T0B 2R0 Box 637 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 Box 188 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 #603,10130-114 St Edmonton, AB T5K 2S6 1165-20 Ave Prince George, BC **POSTAL CODE** old address Box 149 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 195 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 147 Bruderheim, AB **POSTAL CODE** Box 188 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 298 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Box 195 Bruderheim, AB **POSTAL CODE**

(780) 895-2403

Air and groundwater quality. No request for additional information. Air, surface water, groundwater, dust, and property value. Requested Additional information July 5 - Sent via email. continue to consult. No concerns identified.

(780) 796-3958 (780) 796-3963

SW 2-56-20-W4M

Maschmeyer Farms Ltd.

(780) 992-0595

NW 2-56-20-W4M

Roy Benjamin Hauer

(780) 488-7398

No concerns identified.

Ella Reao Quebec

No concerns identified.

NE 2-56-20-W4M

Neil J. Woitas and Rosanna M. Woitas

(780) 796-3734

No concerns identified.

NE 3-56-20-W4M

Cyril D. Paul and Wanda G. Paul Audrey J. Maschmeyer

(780) 796-3764

No concerns identified.

NW 3-56-20-W4M

No concerns identified.

SW 3-56-20-W4M

Stewart Cameron Maschmeyer

(780) 992-0595

No concerns identified.

Andre R. Fournier and Diane H. Fournier SE 3-56-20-W4M Cyril Donald David Paul and Wanda Gayle Paul

No concerns identified. No concerns identified.

Page 4 of 5

HAZCO - Bruderheim Sulphur Forming and Temporary Storage Facility 1.6km Stakeholder & Concerned Citizen Listing Around Section 35-55-20-W4M
Legal Description Owner County of Lamont No. 30 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 Attn: Debbie Hamilton Alberta's Industrial Heartland Suite 1240 Sun Life Place 10123 99th St Edmonton, AB T5J 3H1 Attn: Larry Wall Town of Bruderheim Box 280 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Attn: Jack Lambert Alberta Environment 111 Twin Atria Building 4999-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3 Attn: Kem Singh Attn: Park Powel Attn: Clement Ng Luanne Penner Box 402 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Henry Vissher Box 1074 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 Bill Dembicki Address not given Jerry & Evelyn Dach Address not given Dianne Grosenick Box 176 Lamont, AB T0B 2R0 Paul Purschke Box 151 Bruderheim, AB T0B 0S0 Address Phone Comments May 10 - Project Disclosure Presentation June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent via courier May 12 - Project Disclosure Presentation June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent via courier Concerns No concerns identified. No concerns identified.

May 12 - Project Disclosure Presentation June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent via courier

No concerns identified.

May 12 - Project Disclosure Presentation June 3/05 - Invitation to open house sent via courier Did not attend open house

N/A

Met at Open House July 22/05 - Request for additional information sent. Met at Open House

Life of facility, sulphur demand?, market area, customer list, closure, liner selection, fires. Requested additional information. Facility design, water quality, dust, noise, property value.

Met at Open House Met at Open House Met at Open House July 22/05 - Request for additional information sent. Met at Open House July 22/05 - Request for additional information sent.

Irrational - Opposed project, specific reason not given. No request for additional information. Irrational - Opposed project, specific reason not given. No request for additional information. Air and groundwater quality, infrastructure. Requested additional information. Directional lighting at the site. Requested that HAZCO commit to using directional lighting at the site.

SW11-56-20 W4M

Page 5 of 5

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D-3 OPEN HOUSE SIGN-IN SHEET

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D-4 OPEN HOUSE PRESENTATION BOARDS

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D-5 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX D-6 PROJECT INFORMATION PACKAGE

Integrated Industrial Railway Park & Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. Lamont County 35-055-20 W4M
April 2005

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd. (HAZCO), a division of CCS Income Trust, is developing plans to build an Integrated Industrial Railway Park in Section 35-05520 W4M, 2.2km east of Bruderheim, Alberta. Proposed uses of the railway park would include a sulphur forming and handling for export facility (developed by Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd., a division of HAZCO), a rail car storage facility, as well as a rail car repair and maintenance company. The proposed project will be located on lands owned by HAZCO at 35055-20 W4M. This intent of this package is to provide information surrounding the Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. (AST), its proposed services and related development. The proposed project outlined in this document is based on preliminary information obtained by HAZCO. Project plans will be finalized upon the completion of an environmental site assessment at the proposed development site. Please review the following document for more detailed information related to the proposed project. If you have any questions, comments or concerns related to the information provided, please contact us. Contact information is provided on the last page of this document. COMPANY BACKGROUND The proposed project will be entirely funded and completed by the HAZCO division of CCS Income Trust. CCS Income Trust Service Locations CCS and its divisions are committed to providing environmentally responsible solutions for their customers and

CCS Income Trust is a dynamic growth trust based out of Western Canada with three focused divisions: CCS Energy Services, Concord Well Servicing and HAZCO. These divisions and their subsidiaries provide integrated and environmentally responsible solutions to environmental and waste management challenges.

HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd. is a full service environmental contractor based in Western Canada providing services to the government, industry and the oil and gas sector. HAZCO was incorporated in 1989 and has operated as a private company until being purchased in the fall of 2004 by CCS Income Trust. More information is available in the enclosed brochures and can found on our web site www.hazco.com or the CCS Income Trust web site at www.ccsincometrust.com.

Proposed Site Location

surrounding communities. Protecting the environment and pollution prevention is at the core of our business and we are committed to continually improving our environmental performance. PROJECT OVERVIEW Sulphur, a byproduct of the oil and gas industry, is primarily used in the production of fertilizer world wide. For example, Agrium, a global producer and marketer of agricultural nutrients and industrial products, has a manufacturing facility located at Redwater, Alberta and consumes approximately 350,000 tons of sulphur per year. With increased activity in the heavy oil sector resulting in more produced sulphur, combined with an increase in demand for sulphur worldwide, there is a shortage of sulphur forming capacity in Alberta. The sulphur is produced by various oil and gas operations in Alberta in a molten form,

manufactured in to a dry product (i.e. sulphur pellets) for handling, loaded to rail car for transport to Vancouver, and loaded on ships for delivery to export markets. The proposed project will require an operating approval issued by Alberta Environment. Ongoing monitoring and the associated reporting activities will also be reported to Alberta Environment on an annual basis. The proposed project includes facilities for sulphur forming and shipping, as well as facilities for short-term storage of excess sulphur in cases of an emergency or market down turn. In terms of operations, molten sulphur will be received by one of three methods, pipeline, rail tank car or truck. The sulphur will be stored in tanks before being pumped to the forming process. AST plans to use an environmental friendly technology provided by Sandvik

Process Systems (information enclosed) to pastillate the sulphur into a formed product suitable for export. The product will be stored on engineered storage pads and loaded to rail car unit trains. The volumes of liquid and dry storage will be dependant on market demand for our services and will also grow with demand. This sulphur can be poured into a block and recovered when conditions change. The supply chain for sulphur can be subject to interruptions such as rail stoppage, labour shortages, port space, vessel availability and many others. Interruptions require as much flexibility in the sulphur forming facility as possible. The facility will require a small storage area for a sulphur block. The sulphur block storage will be surrounded by an earthen berm which will provide a sight barrier. The sulphur stored in the block can be recovered when conditions improve. We are not permitting for long term subsurface storage, only allowing for a block to pour without a visual impact. The sulphur forming component of the proposed facility includes: Rail and road access for receiving and shipping sulphur; Sulphur unloading and transfer facilities; Sulphur forming facilities to produce sulphur pellets (pastilles); and, Loading and shipping facilities for formed sulphur. The short term storage facilities will consist of an engineered containment area having the following design features:

A primary synthetic liner; Neutralization and discharge systems to manage water that accumulates in the storage cells; A compacted clay liner to act as secondary containment in the event that the primary liner in compromised; Perimeter berms to provide a sight and sound barrier and prevent runon and run-off; and, Appropriate security systems, operating and monitoring procedures.

Estimated Cost Preliminary cost estimates suggest the development would involve capital spending of approximately $30 million dollars (CDN). Economic Impact HAZCO anticipates that the facility will create approximately 8 to 12 full time positions. In addition, HAZCO will make every effort to utilize local contractors during facility construction. Estimated Schedule A preliminary schedule for the project is outlined below.

REGULATORY APPROVAL CONSULTATION PROCESS

AND

The regulatory approval process provides many opportunities for public consultation and input. Actual dates for community meetings and open houses will be advertised in the local media.

Specific timing for HAZCOs planned regulatory review and consultation is outlined as follows: Community consultation May though to proposed facility operations Regulatory Application Filing Fall 2005 Regulatory Review and Approval Winter 2005/2006 As part of the regulatory review and approval, Alberta Environment will evaluate, among other things, geotechnical considerations, site suitability and environmental controls and monitoring programs. HAZCO will seek input from all stakeholders during each phase of the project. Stakeholder consultation will be completed before filing regulatory applications, during construction and after facility start-up. Consultation will include individual meetings, public meetings, updates, open houses and presentations. If you think you are directly affected by the proposed facility, please do not hesitate to call us. Our contacts and their areas of responsibility are on the last page of this document. Discussions will be held to identify, address and resolve issues wherever possible. Interested parties will also have the opportunity to review the detailed regulatory application documents once they have been filed. SULPHUR MANAGEMENT Largely due to environmental concerns, the processing of Western Canadas oil and gas resources requires the extraction of as much sulphur as possible. When the sulphur is extracted from gas and/or oil, the sulphur is handled in a liquid form at temperatures ranging from 124 -145C. These high temperatures mean that handling, transportation and storage of the sulphur creates issues not only from a

health and safety perspective but also in terms of economical handling. For easier handling, storage and transportation, sulphur is formed into flakes or pastilles (pellets). The proposed AST facility plans to utilize the Sandvik Rotoform system to process the liquid sulphur received at the facility. The process starts with the delivery of liquids sulphur by pipeline or in special trucks. There will be no associated odour with the sulphur as the facility will only accept degassed sulphur (i.e. majority of the H2S has been removed to <10ppm H2S). The sulphur is then transferred into heated tanks awaiting the pastillation process. The basic pastillation principle consists of a feeding system which deposits droplets of liquid sulphur onto a continuously running steel belt. Water is sprayed against the underside of the belt and the resulting transfer of heat converts the droplets into solid pastilles. This process forms molten sulphur product into pastilles so there is no requirement for grinding or crushing upon subsequent processing by HAZCO clients. This eliminates the costs for environmental problems such as noise and dust, which are usually associated with these secondary processes. A process flow diagram outlining the pastillation process is provided on the following page. All workers will be properly trained to operate the facility and a facility emergency response plan will be developed in cooperation with local emergency response officials.

Typical Rotoform-Plant
Raw material II Raw material I
M

Product pump

Fine filter

Rotoformer Exhaust air

Steel belt cooler Exhaust air

Reactor resp. Mixer

Granules silo

Bagging weighing

Prefilter Storage

M
Release agent

cooling water cooling water return

Release agent applicator

Tensioning drum (Heating optional)

water collecting tank

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT HAZCO is committed to environmental management as it is a vital part of our business. The environmental protection measures put in place at all CCS Income Trust facilities are second to none. We meet or exceed regulatory requirements and coupled with monitoring programs and sound facility operation, this ensures that there is no adverse impact to the environment. That being said, HAZCO anticipates a variety of concerns from community stakeholders and government officials due to the nature of the proposed project. In addition, community consultation is a top priority for the company and we are committed to work with project stakeholders to ensure the project creates minimal impact to the community and the environment. As a result, HAZCO will assemble a team of environmental experts to undertake an Environmental Site Assessment for the facility. In conjunction with Alberta Environment and project stakeholders, HAZCO will ensure that all information requirements are met prior to the filing of the regulatory application. Since the project is very preliminary at this point, many of the site specific information is not yet available. Once this information is obtained, HAZCO will provide updates to project stakeholders as part of the consultation and information sharing process.

COMPANY CONTACTS All proposed development activities will be coordinated from the CCS Income Trust office in Calgary, Alberta. The company address is: HAZCO Environmental Services 2400, 530 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8 Inquiries related to the proposed project are welcome and should be directed to: Paul Kaethler Project Sponsor Tel. 403.231.8438 pkaethler@ccsenergyservices.com Corey Higham Regulatory and Environment Tel. 403.231.8425 chigham@ccsenergyservices.com Toll Free: 1-888-842-7833

ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS BRUDERHEIM, ALBERTA


HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd., a division of CCS Income Trust, has submitted an application to Alberta Environment for approval to construct and operate a Sulphur Management Facility to be located at Section 35-055-20 W4M approximately 2.2 km east of Bruderheim, Alberta, just north of Highway 15. The following information is intended as a brief overview of the project in an effort to maintain effective communications with stakeholders.

CORPORATE OVERVIEW
The proposed project will be entirely funded and completed by the HAZCO division of CCS Income Trust. HAZCO is an industry leader providing a wide-range of specialized services including: Sulphur Services, Site Remediation, Decommissioning, Waste Services, Environmental Construction, Environmental Technologies, Emergency Response and Other Specialty Services. More information is available at our web site www.hazco.com or the CCS Income Trust web site at www.ccsincometrust.com.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Sulphur, a by-product of the oil and gas industry, is primarily used in the production of fertilizer world wide. Increased activity in the heavy oil sector resulting in more produced sulphur and combined with an increase in demand for sulphur exports worldwide, there is a shortage of sulphur forming capacity in Alberta. The proposed project includes facilities for sulphur forming and shipping, as well as facilities for the temporary storage of excess sulphur in cases of an emergency or market interruption. Molten sulphur will be received by pipeline, rail tank car or truck. The sulphur will be stored in tanks before being pumped to the forming process. Alberta Sulphur Terminals plans to use an environmental friendly technology, provided by Sandvik Process Systems, to process the liquid sulphur into a formed product (i.e. pastilles) suitable for export. The product will be stored on engineered storage pads and loaded onto rail car unit trains when certain volumes are required. The volumes of liquid and dry storage will be dependant on market demand for our services and will also grow with demand. This sulphur also can be poured into a block and recovered when conditions change. The supply chain can be subject to interruptions, such as rail stoppage, labour shortages, port space, vessel availability and many others. Interruptions require as much flexibility in the sulphur forming facility as is possible. As a result, the facility will require a small temporary storage area for a sulphur block. The sub-grade sulphur block storage area will be visually restricted on two or more sides by an earthen berm which will provide a sight barrier. The sulphur stored in the block can be recovered when conditions improve.

Page 1 of 3

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Subject to regulatory approvals, construction will commence in the spring of 2006 and will take approximately 6 to 7 months to complete. Facility operations will commence immediately after the facility has been constructed with a target date of November 2006.

ECONOMIC IMPACT
HAZCO is committed to supporting the local economy both in construction and operations of the facility. Long-term facility operations are expected to create up to 20 full time positions.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
HAZCO plans to utilize the latest technology to control emissions and minimize its impact on the surrounding environment. AIR QUALITY Odours at the site will be minimal as all of the sulphur received on site is degassed to less than 10 parts per million H2S. With the facility located at the center of property and with a minimum 600 meter setback from the surrounding properties, there will be essentially no odours from the proposed site. Air quality and dust impacts will be addressed through air monitoring programs and a soil monitoring program. The monitoring programs will be required as part of an Alberta Environment Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Approval. The approval will stipulate acceptable air monitoring parameters and associated criteria that will ensure no adverse effect on human health or the surrounding environment. SOIL QUALITY Facility operations are not expected to adversely affect local soil quality. Alberta Environment and Alberta Energy and Utility requirements have been incorporated into the design and will be strictly adhered to. An Alberta Environment approved soil monitoring program will also be completed and reviewed on a yearly basis. TRAFFIC At the busiest times, HAZCO anticipates approximately one to two additional trains per week as well as approximately 40 trucks per day. HAZCO is currently completing a Traffic Impact Assessment which will indicate if any upgrades to the Highway 15 and Highway 45 intersections are required to maintain a safe access. HAZCO will incorporate all appropriate measures to ensure proper access and egress of truck traffic from Highways 15 and 45. All proposed accesses are required to be reviewed and approved by Alberta Transportation. GROUNDWATER QUALITY Groundwater monitoring wells will be installed in accordance with Alberta Environment guidelines and will be used to sample groundwater each spring and fall. The groundwater monitoring program will be designed and performed by an independent professional hydrogeologist. Collected samples will be sent to an offsite, third party laboratory to determine the groundwater quality beneath the site for the life of the project. This will provide early indication of any impacts on local geology and/or hydrogeology in the unlikely event they may occur. The favourable site conditions (silt clay overburden with low hydraulic conductivity) and the monitoring program will be further complimented by the proposed facility design that makes use of double liner systems, and run-off control systems as well as sound facility operation.
Page 2 of 3

SURFACE WATER QUALITY All precipitation that falls on the active working area of the facility will be collected in a lined ditching system and directed to a lined surface water collection pond. At this time, HAZCO has no plans to discharge any of the surface water run-off collected in the surface water pond as the pond will be used as a source of water for process make-up water requirements and for the fire suppression system. In the event where water from the surface water pond needs to be released due to capacity restraints (likely due to excessive precipitation events), the water will be sampled and analyzed to confirm the surface water pond water quality meets applicable surface water quality guidelines. If the water does not meet the applicable criteria the water will then be treated and re-tested. NOISE LEVELS Hazco is in the initial stages of completing a Noise Impact Assessment (NIA). The NIA will be completed prior to facility start-up and, if approved, after start-up of operations. Any noise impact beyond established acceptable levels will require attention to mitigate noise impacts. FACILITY SAFETY The proposed facilitys operation plans, Occupational Health and Safety policy and Emergency Response plans for facility operations, sulphur fires and potential evacuations will be reviewed and filed with all local emergency response officials and organizations, Alberta Environment and the local municipal governments.

HAZCO CONTACTS
The HAZCO Alberta Sulphur Terminals project team is committed to working with the community throughout the development of this project. Should you wish to obtain additional information regarding this project, please contact: Paul Kaethler HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd. 2400, 530 8 Avenue S.W. Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 Direct: (403) 231-8438 Toll Free: (888) 842-7833 Email: pkaethler@ccsenergyservices.com

Corey Higham HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd. 2400, 530 8 Avenue S.W. Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 Direct: (403) 231-8425 Toll Free: (888) 842-7833 Email: chigham@ccsenergyservices.com

Page 3 of 3

August 2005

Hazco Environmental Services Ltd. Alberta Sulphur Terminals Project Project Questions and Answers

1. Who is actually proposing this facility? Is it Hazco or CCS? The facility is proposed by Hazco Environmental Services Ltd. Hazco is a wholly owned subsidiary of CCS Income Trust.

2. What exactly are you proposing to build? Hazco is proposing to build a Sulphur Management Facility. The facility would receive liquid sulphur and form the sulphur (using a process called Rotoforming) into a pastille product that would then be shipped off site to market. There would be a portion of the site dedicated to temporary storage, either as formed product or poured to block, in the event that downstream logistics fail (rail, port, and shipping).

3. Where will it be located and how much land will be required? The proposed site will be located near the centre of section 35, Township 55, Range 20, W4M (2.2 km east of Bruderheim, Alberta, just north of Highway 15). The facility footprint will be approximately 79 acres (32 ha.), not including the rail track.

4. What will it look like when completed? How big will the sulphur pile be? Will it be stacked in blocks or a giant pile? The facility will consist of a storage tank area, office/manufacturing structure, product receiving and storage area, surface water storage pond, and a rail loading area. It is intended that the storage pile will be less than 50 feet tall and cover an area of less than 3 acres (1.2 ha.). Sulphur may be stored as both block and finished product depending on market conditions.

August 2005

5. What is your proposed schedule for approvals, construction and completion? An application for the facility was submitted to Alberta Environment on July 25, 2005. Typical turnaround for these applications is 4-6 months. Construction activities are estimated to take 6-7 months depending on the time of year. Completion is targeted for November 2006.

6. How much will it cost? The anticipated capital cost of the project is approximately $30 Million (Cdn.)

7. How many people will be required to build the facility and how many of those will be local? It is anticipated that 36,000 person hours will be required to build the facility (approximately 40 full time employees). Once the facility is operational, the site will provide up to 20 full time positions. It is Hazcos intent to hire as many local people as possible.

8. Why is this a good area to build your facility? better than somewhere more remote?

What makes this

The area is an ideal choice for the facility due to access to rail, road and infrastructure as well as availability of a skilled labour pool. Placing the facility in a remote area would negate these benefits and significantly increase the capital cost while reducing the usefulness of the facility.

9. Why do you think so many local people are opposed to your project? Actually there is a lot of support for this project and through continued honest and transparent communication; we believe that the community will accept Hazco based on the sound design, construction and operation of the proposed facility. We believe those opposed lack of understanding about the project as well as apprehension about what this project means to local property values and existing

August 2005

lifestyle. So its our job to ensure we provide them with as more information as possible to make an informed decision.

10. How willing would you be to live near this facility? Id be very will to live near this facility because I understand that the facility design, environmental monitoring programs and safe operation of the facility will work together to ensure that there is no impact to human health or the surrounding environment.

11. How would you like it if you looked out your window and all you saw was a sulphur storage facility? Hazco is taking steps to limit or eliminate the visual impact that the facility will have. A combination of tree lines, fences, wind screens and earthen berms will be employed to reduce the visual impact of the facility.

12. Whats your reaction to the petition opposing the facility that going around? Its not appropriate for us to comment on what others are saying or doing. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. Hazco encourages open and constructive feedback. Thats why were conducting sessions, holding meetings and in

general, making it easy for folks to provide us with their feedback to the project.

13. Whats your reaction to the opponent website thats now up and running? Again, its not appropriate for us to comment on what others are saying or doing. Everyone is entitled to their opinions and Hazco encourages open and constructive feedback.

14. What guarantees can you give that your project wont have negative impact on air quality, especially dust and particulates?

August 2005

Bulk handling of any aggregate or solid will result in the formation of dust (gravel, sand, coal, sulphur). Hazco recognizes that there will be some localized impact immediately adjacent to the proposed facility but believes that this impact will be limited to a 200 metre radius around the facility itself. Given that there is greater than 600 meters from the facility to the property boundary in all directions Hazco does not believe that there will be any offsite impact. In addition, Hazco will be required to complete a yearly approved soil monitoring program that will be reviewed by Alberta Environment.

15. What guarantees can you give that this project wont have a negative impact on water quality, especially runoff? Environmental protection is a top priority for Hazco. The measures incorporated into the facility design (such as the surface water run-off pond) and sound operation will ensure that there will be no impact to human health or the surrounding environment. With respect to surface water run-off, all precipitation that falls on the active working area of the facility will be collected in a lined surface water collection pond. The water collected in the pond is then tested, treated and then recycled, released or disposed.

16. How will you collect, store and treat runoff water? With respect to surface water run-off, all precipitation that falls on the active working area of the facility will be collected in a lined surface water collection pond. The water collected in the pond is then tested, treated and then recycled, released or disposed.

17. What assurances can you give that this project wont have negative impacts on drinking water? Environmental protection is a top priority for Hazco. The measures incorporated into the facility design will ensure that there will be no impact to drinking water in the area. For example, silt clay overburden at the site had low hydraulic Hazco will also

conductivity and the vertical hydraulic gradient is also low.

August 2005

implement a semi-annual groundwater monitoring program performed by an independent hydrogeologist. The favourable site conditions and monitoring

program will be further complimented by the proposed facility design that makes use of double liner systems, and run-off control systems as well as sound facility operation.

18. How much more rail and truck traffic can residents expect when your project is up and running? We anticipate approximately one to two additional unit trains per week as well as approximately 40 trucks per day.

19. What kind of support do you have for your project from local councils and municipalities? We made a presentation to the Lamont County Council in May 2005 and at that time the response was favourable. To date, we have not submitted any

applications to the county, and have not followed up with the councilors regarding this project. The intent is to submit the development permit application in late August 2005.

20. How will you deal with the safety issues with so much more road and rail traffic? Hazcos health and safety program is second to none. As a result, Alberta

Transportation has been contacted with respect to the Highway 15 and Highway 45 access points associated with the proposed facility. A traffic impact

assessment is currently being completed on the proposed intersections. The results of the traffic impact assessment are pending.

With respect to the rail traffic, Hazco anticipates one to two unit trains per week so the effect on traffic patterns will be minimal. Discussions with Lamont County may be initiated to upgrade rail crossings if they become a safety issue.

August 2005

21. What assurances can you give people living nearby that noise, lights and smells wont impact their quality of life? With respect to the noise, Hazco will be completing a Noise Impact Assessment prior to and, if approved, after start-up of operations. Any noise impact beyond established acceptable levels will require attention.

Lighting concerns have been identified and as a result Hazco is committed to using directional lighting as opposed to flood lights, minimizing the amount of light pollution.

Odours at the site will be non-existent as all of the sulphur received on site is degassed to less than 10ppm H2S. With the facility located at the center of property and a minimum of 600 meter setback from the surrounding properties, we believe there will be no odours at the site boundaries.

22. What have you done to keep area residents informed about your proposal? Communication with all of our stakeholders is a top priority at Hazco. We believe that to be accepted into a community and become a good neighbour, our communication lines need to be transparent and continue much further than just the application process. To date, we have met with officials with Lamont County and Alberta Environment and have individually met with all residents located within a 1.6km (1 mile) radius of the site. In addition, we have hosted an open house where 63 people attended. Hazco has also committed to providing

community members with updates related to project status.

23. Opponents to your project claim that the technology youre using to store the sulphur is new and untested? What are you doing

differently compared to more traditional sulphur storage facilities?

August 2005

A similar facility located near Sundre, Alberta, using the same technology, has been operating for the last 14 years in a similar environment. To date, the

Sundre facility has processed more than 22 million tonnes of sulphur. The only change to the facility would be designing and construction the temporary sulphur storage block sub-grade and constructing perimeter berms to provide a visual barrier from the sulphur block.

24. What assurances can you give residents that this technology will actually work, especially on the long term? A similar facility located near Sundre, Alberta, using the same technology, has been operating for the last 14 years in a similar environment. To date, the

Sundre facility has processed more than 22 million tonnes of sulphur. To our knowledge, there have been no issues or emergencies with respect to the Sundre, Alberta facility.

25. What would happen if your sulphur pile caught fire? What would the threat be to nearby residents? In the unlikely event of a sulphur fire on site, the first responders would be the personnel currently on shift. Given the proper training and equipment, it is

intended that all such incidents will be dealt with immediately by personnel on site. Sulphur fires are easily extinguished using water or by the use of any

chemical fire extinguisher. The onsite surface water runoff pond will also double as a fire water pond for source water.

There would be no threat to any nearby residents in the vast majority of incidences. The Emergency Response Plan (ERP) for the facility will detail any actions required should the first responders fail to control the incident. As a result, the ERP will be filed with the Town of Bruderheim, Town of Lamont, Lamont County, Northeast Region Community Awareness and Emergency

August 2005

Response Group, local industry representatives and Local Emergency Response officials.

26. What would you do about the stink of burning sulphur? Extinguish the sulphur fire. The primary emission from a sulphur fire is Sulphur Dioxide (SO2). Sulphur Dioxide is colorless, denser than air, and has a pungent odour. Control of any sulphur fire is the key to eliminating the gas. Normal atmospheric dispersion will eliminate the gas in time. The Emergency Response Plan for the facility will detail any actions required should sulphur dioxide be released in hazardous quantities.

27. How dangerous are the health risks if there is a sulphur fire? No more or less dangerous than a fire at any other industrial site. It depends on the situation and how well any potential incident is managed. The Emergency Response plans, coupled with proper training of the onsite personnel and first responders will minimize or eliminate any potential health risks.

28. Theres strong concern that if water seeps into your sulphur pile it will create significant amounts of sulphuric acid. What assurances can you give that this wont happen and what will you do if it does happen? Environmental protection is a top priority to Hazco. The measures incorporated into the facility design (such as the surface water run-off pond) and sound operation will ensure that there will be no impact to human health or the surrounding environment. All precipitation that falls on the active working area of the facility will be collected in a lined surface water collection pond. The water collected in the pond is then tested, treated and then recycled, released or disposed.

29. Why, according to the petition, havent you developed an emergency response plan for the project?

August 2005

The safety of the public and workers and environmental protection is a top priority at Hazco. The Emergency Response Plan for the plant is currently under development. Upon completion of a draft plan, copies will be forwarded to Town of Bruderheim, Town of Lamont, Lamont County, Northeast Region Community Awareness and Emergency Response Group, local industry representatives and Local Emergency Response officials for comment. Upon receipt of the comments, a final Emergency Response Plan will be developed and filed with all stakeholders mentioned above prior to commencement of operations.

30. How many full time jobs will this project create? It is anticipated that 36,000 person hours will be required to build the facility (approximately 40 full time employees). Once the facility is operational, the site will provide up to 20 full time positions. It is Hazcos intent to hire as many local people as possible.

31. How significant will this project be to the local tax base? The estimated taxes for the proposed project will be approximately $100,000. This value is based on a preliminary estimate and would need to be finalized based on a formal property tax assessment of the site.

32. Where will the sulphur come from and how will it get here? The sulphur is produced during oil and gas production and refining in Alberta. The major sources of sulphur to be process at the proposed facility will be Fort Saskatchewan, Fort McMurray and Lloydminster. Molten sulphur will be received by one of three methods, pipeline, rail tank car or truck.

33. What do you do with the sulphur once it arrives? processed?

How is it

August 2005

In terms of operations, molten sulphur will be received by one of three methods, pipeline, rail tank car or truck. The sulphur will be stored as a liquid in tanks before being pumped to the forming process. Hazco plans to use an environmental friendly technology provided by Sandvik Process Systems to process the liquid sulphur into a formed product (i.e. pastilles) suitable for export. The product will be stored on engineered storage pads and when volumes dictate loaded to rail car unit trains. The volumes of liquid and dry storage will be dependant on market demand for our services and will also grow with demand. This sulphur also can be poured into a block and recovered when conditions change.

34. The website opposed to your proposal speaks to tens of thousands of hits about sulphur fires and evacuations. Why do they happen so often and what steps will you take to make sure it wont happen here? Hazco can not comment about the web site searches with respect to sulphur fires, however, we can confirm that sulphur fires can and do happen. The

proposed facilitys operation plans, Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) policy and Emergency Response plans for sulphur fires and potential evacuations will be reviewed and filed with all local emergency response officials and organizations, Alberta Environment and the local municipal governments.

35. Why not build this facility at a more remote location, not so close to farms and communities? Hazco was attracted to the area due to the availability of industrial land. Since the land was zoned industrial, Hazco believed the site was a great fit due to the site characteristics, proximity to rail, highways and sulphur production sources.

36. Why not build in a community that supports your project instead of one with so much opposition?

10

August 2005

It is common for any industrial facility to encounter public opposition in an area that has historically been agricultural. Through honest and transparent

communication, we believe that the community will accept Hazco based on the sound design, construction and operation of the proposed facility.

37. A flyer is being distributed by the Friends of Lamont County who are opposed to your project. Whats your reaction to the things being said in the flyer? Its not appropriate for us to comment on what others are saying or doing. Hazco realizes that a flyer and petition are being distributed within the community. I would suggest you contact the people distributing the flyer for further information.

38. The flyer asks Will our quality of life survive Hazcos Sulphur Storage facility. Its obvious some people are very concerned about your proposal. What do you say to these folks? Environmental protection and safety is a top priority to Hazco. Hazco maintains that the quality of life will not be affected due to facility design and sound operation of the facility which will ensure no impact to human health or the surrounding environment.

39. The flyer maintains that the storage facility is a waste of prime industrial land with very little tax return. Whats your response to that? Hazco maintains that the proposed facility is a good fit for the property due to the surrounding area.

40. What impact do you think your facility will have on attracting other industrial developments in the community? Hazco can not comment on the intent of other industries moving to Lamont County.

11

August 2005

41. The residents say this is just the tip of the iceberg and that if this project is approved than Lamont County will become the dumping ground for Alberta sulphur. concerns? Whats your response to those

The production of sulphur within the oil and gas industry is reality. Facilities such as the one proposed here are sound methods of processing the sulphur into a saleable product such as fertilizer.

42. Why was a similar proposal from Hazco rejected in Sturgeon County and Thornhild 2002? The proposed projects in Sturgeon and Thornhild Counties were not rejected, the proposals were withdrawn by Hazco. The facilities were different than the facility proposed here as the Sturgeon and Thornhild projects proposed sub-surface long term storage (i.e. burial) as opposed to short term storage. The proposed projects also encountered difficulty securing customers.

12

Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. Bruderheim, Alberta Area


Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd., a division of Hazco Environmental Services (HAZCO), is proposing to build a Sulphur Management Facility 2.2 kilometers east of Bruderheim, Alberta, just north of Highway 15. The facility would receive liquid sulphur and form the sulphur (using a process called Rotoforming) into a pastille product that would then be shipped off site to market. There would be a portion of the site dedicated to temporary emergency storage, either as formed product or poured to block, in the event that downstream logistics fail (rail, port, and shipping). Lamont County is an ideal choice for the facility due to access to rail, road and infrastructure, site hydrogeology as well as availability of a skilled labour pool. The facility design, environmental monitoring programs and safe operation of the facility will work together to ensure that there is no impact to human health, public safety or the surrounding environment. We believe that to be accepted into a community and become a good neighbour, our communication lines need to be transparent and continue much further than just the application process. Local Benefits HAZCO is committed to supporting the local economy both in construction and operations of the facility. Construction of the facility will create between 40-50 positions. Long-term facility operations are expected to create up to 20 full time positions. Create a larger base to grow industry in the area. Schedule Application was made to Alberta Environment for approval to construct and operate the proposed facility in July 2005. Application currently under review. Application was made to Lamont County for a Development Permit in August 2005. Application currently under review. Construction activities would commence once all approvals and permits are in place.

Information Package Current Project Information Downloads Project Information Package Project Question & Answer Package Site Plot Plan Facility Plot Plan

Project QuestionnaireRevised Project Contacts Paul Kaethler (403) 231-8438 pkaethler@ccsenergyservices.com Corey Higham (403) 231-8425 chigham@ccsenergyservices.com

ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS BRUDERHEIM, ALBERTA


HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd., a division of CCS Income Trust, has submitted an application to Alberta Environment for approval to construct and operate a Sulphur Management Facility to be located at Section 35-055-20 W4M approximately 2.2 km east of Bruderheim, Alberta, just north of Highway 15. The following information is intended as a brief overview of the project in an effort to maintain effective communications with stakeholders.

CORPORATE OVERVIEW
The proposed project will be funded and completed by the HAZCO division of CCS Income Trust. HAZCO is an industry leader providing a wide-range of specialized services including: Sulphur Services, Facility Operation, Site Remediation, Decommissioning, Waste Services, Environmental Construction, Environmental Technologies, Emergency Response and Other Specialty Services. More information is available at our web site www.hazco.com or the CCS Income Trust web site at www.ccsincometrust.com.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Sulphur, a by-product of the oil and gas industry, is primarily used in the production of fertilizer world wide. Increased activity in the heavy oil sector resulting in more produced sulphur and combined with an increase in demand for sulphur exports worldwide, there is a shortage of sulphur forming capacity in Alberta. The proposed project includes facilities for sulphur forming and sulphur pastille storage. Molten sulphur will be received by pipeline, rail tank car or truck. The sulphur will be stored in insulated, heated tanks before being pumped to the forming process. Alberta Sulphur Terminals plans to use an environmental friendly technology, provided by Sandvik Process Systems, to process the liquid sulphur into a formed product (i.e. pastilles) suitable for export. The product will be stored on engineered storage pads and loaded onto rail car unit trains on a regular basis. As Hazco proceeded with its public consultation program, it has become evident that there is a great deal opposition and confusion with respect to the emergency sulphur staging area (i.e. sulphur block) as originally published in Hazcos project information documents. After consultation with Hazcos prospective clients, the decision was made to remove the emergency sulphur staging area from the proposed facility application. This action was taken to clarify the main objective of the project which is to provide a long term service/manufacturing facility for the oil and gas industry facilitating the export of sulphur from Canada to the world.

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Subject to regulatory approvals, construction will commence in the spring of 2006 and will take approximately 6 to 7 months to complete. Facility operations will commence immediately after the facility has been constructed with a target date of November 2006.
Revised: October 21, 2005 Page 1 of 3

ECONOMIC IMPACT
HAZCO is committed to supporting the local economy both in construction and operations of the facility. Long-term facility operations are expected to create 21 full time positions initially.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
HAZCO plans to utilize the latest technology to control emissions and minimize its impact on the surrounding environment. AIR QUALITY Odours at the site will be minimal as all of the sulphur received on site is degassed to less than 10 parts per million H2S. With the facility located at the center of property and with a minimum 600 meter setback from the surrounding properties, there will be essentially no odours from the proposed site. Air quality and dust impacts will be addressed through air monitoring programs and a soil monitoring program. The monitoring programs will be required as part of an Alberta Environment Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Approval. The approval will stipulate acceptable air monitoring parameters and associated criteria that will ensure no adverse effect on human health or the surrounding environment. SOIL QUALITY Facility operations are not expected to adversely affect local soil quality. Alberta Environment and Alberta Energy and Utility requirements have been incorporated into the design and will be strictly adhered to. An Alberta Environment approved soil monitoring program will also be completed and reviewed on a yearly basis. TRAFFIC At the busiest times, HAZCO anticipates approximately one to two additional trains per week as well as approximately 40 trucks per day. HAZCO has completed a Traffic Impact Assessment which has indicated that upgrades to the Highway 15 intersection are required to maintain a safe access. No improvements will be necessary for the Highway 45 intersection. The Traffic Impact Assessment is currently under review by Alberta Transportation. GROUNDWATER QUALITY Groundwater monitoring wells will be installed in accordance with Alberta Environment guidelines and will be used to sample groundwater each spring and fall. The groundwater monitoring program will be designed and performed by an independent professional hydrogeologist. Collected samples will be sent to an offsite, third party laboratory to determine the groundwater quality beneath the site for the life of the project. This will provide early indication of any impacts on local geology and/or hydrogeology in the unlikely event they may occur. The favourable site conditions (silt clay overburden with low hydraulic conductivity) and the monitoring program will be further complimented by the proposed facility design that makes use of double liner systems, and run-off control systems as well as sound facility operation. SURFACE WATER QUALITY All precipitation that falls on the active working area of the facility will be collected in a lined ditching system and directed to a lined surface water collection pond. At this time, HAZCO has no plans to discharge any of the surface water run-off collected in the surface water pond as the pond will be used as a source of water for process make-up water requirements and for the fire suppression system. In the event where water from the surface water pond needs to be released due to capacity restraints (likely due to excessive precipitation events), the water will be sampled and analyzed to confirm the surface water
Revised: October 21, 2005 Page 2 of 3

pond water quality meets applicable surface water quality guidelines. If the water does not meet the applicable criteria the water will then be treated and re-tested. NOISE LEVELS Hazco is in the initial stages of completing a Noise Impact Assessment (NIA). The NIA will be completed prior to facility start-up and, if approved, after start-up of operations. Any noise impact beyond established acceptable levels will require attention to mitigate noise impacts. FACILITY SAFETY The proposed facilitys operation plans, Occupational Health and Safety policy and Emergency Response plans will be reviewed and filed with all local emergency response officials and organizations, Alberta Environment and the local municipal governments.

HAZCO CONTACTS
The HAZCO Alberta Sulphur Terminals project team is committed to working with the community throughout the development of this project. Should you wish to obtain additional information regarding this project, please contact: Paul Kaethler HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd. 2400, 530 8 Avenue S.W. Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 Direct: (403) 231-8438 Toll Free: (888) 842-7833 Email: pkaethler@ccsenergyservices.com

Corey Higham HAZCO Environmental Services Ltd. 2400, 530 8 Avenue S.W. Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 Direct: (403) 231-8425 Toll Free: (888) 842-7833 Email: chigham@ccsenergyservices.com

Revised: October 21, 2005

Page 3 of 3

Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd. Bruderheim, Alberta Area


Alberta Sulphur Terminals Ltd., a division of Hazco Environmental Services (HAZCO), is proposing to build a Sulphur Forming and Pastille Storage Facilty 2.2 kilometers east of Bruderheim, Alberta, just north of Highway 15. The facility would receive liquid sulphur and form the sulphur (using a process called Rotoforming) into a pastille product that would then be shipped off site to export markets. There would be a portion of the site dedicated to formed product. Lamont County is an ideal choice for the facility due to access to rail, road and infrastructure, site hydrogeology as well as availability of a skilled labour pool. The facility design, environmental monitoring programs and safe operation of the facility will work together to ensure that there is no impact to human health, public safety or the surrounding environment. We believe that to be accepted into a community and become a good neighbour, our communication lines need to be transparent and continue much further than just the application process. Local Benefits HAZCO is committed to supporting the local economy both in construction and operations of the facility. Construction of the facility will create between 40-50 positions. Initial facility operations are expected to create 21 full time positions. Create a larger base to grow industry in the area. Schedule A revised application was made to Alberta Environment for approval to construct and operate the proposed facility in October 2005. The application was revised to incorporate removal of the emergency inventory staging area (i.e. sulphur block). The EIS area was removed in response to stakeholder concerns. The revised application is currently under review. Application was made to Lamont County for a Development Permit in August 2005. Lamont County has requested further information. Hazco has retained independent third party consultants to satisfy the Countys request.. Construction activities would commence once all approvals and permits are in place. For more information about the project, please visit the HAZCO website at www.hazco.com and follow the link to the Alberta Sulphur Terminals information page.
Revised: October 21, 2005

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX E OFFER TO PURCHASE AND LAND TITLE INFORMATION

EPEA APPROVAL APPLICATION ALBERTA SULPHUR TERMINALS LTD.

APPENDIX E-1 OFFER TO PURCHASE AND LAND TITLES

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi