Republic of the Philippines, JUDICIAL and BAR COUNCIL, SUPREME COURT, En Banc, Manila Urgent Verified Oppositions To the

Nominations-Applications of CJ Candidates: 1.) Cesar L. Villanueva, 2.) Retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (Manuel de Jesus Siayngco), 3.) Amado D. Valdez, 4.) Vicente R. Velasquez, and 5.) Maria Carolina T. Legarda, and Urgent Verified Motions 1.) To Exclude from the July 25, 2012 2-5 p.m. Televised Panel Interview, Retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (Manuel de Jesus Siayngco - adjudged with finality as philanderer, immoral, shackled, by the 2004 G.R. NO. 158896 Justice Minita Viray-Chico Nazario annulment of marriage Decision in Juanita Siaynco vs. Judge Manuel Siaynco, 2.) To Expunge from the JBC records and file, the Opposition of Lauro Visconde (co-conspirator) and Dante Jimenez (guilty of another indirect contempt and palpable forum-shopping to reverse his SC final punishment-fine for Indirect Contempt); it is trifling with the Courts, contrary to the elementary principles of right dealing and good faith." (People vs. Acierto, 92 Phil. 534), 3) To Consider the Quezon City prosecutors office (Fiscal Donald Lee) 1995 National Health Insurance Act filed criminal case against Lauro Visconde, as International Broadcasting Co. (IBC) Director (who was given the job, since Visconde has no visible means of support), 4) To Direct Atty. Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite, JBC Executive Officer, to file Comment (R.A. 6713, inter alia, and furnish copy) to Oppositors Formal Complaint against her f a) gross ignorance of the law, b) gross incompetence and c) gross disregard of JBC-009 & the 1987 Constitution, d) violation of her lawyers oath of office and e) professional indiscretion. SC Associate Justice Diosdado M. Peralta, Chairman, The Members, the Secretariat and the Ex-officio Secretary, Judicial and Bar Council, En Banc, Supreme Court, Manila Your Honors, Undersigned Applicant-Oppositor, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., by himself and for himself, as Applicant-Nominee and Oppositor, unto this Honorable Judicial and Bar Council, most respectfully avers that: 1. On July 18, 2012, about 2 p.m., Oppositor Judge Florentino Floro talked to Atty. Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite, JBC Executive Officer, thusly:
1

a.) Oppositor formally complained against Capacites failure to alert in writing the JBC members of the lack of qualifications and gross disqualifications of an immoral CJ candidate retired Malolos City, Bulacan RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco; b.) Oppositor demanded, asked and required Capacite to explain in writing and manufacture a written Urgent Report to the JBC members (an explanation, summary and finding on this sick retired RTC Judge); c.) Capacite said that napakarami nang mga dokumentong pina-file ditto! Oppositor told her, that she need not go over the Personal Data Sheet of this philanderer Judge, for if she would only type the name Judge Manuel Siaynco in Google or Yahoo search engines, in the Internet computer in front of her, she would readily find the final Judgment in his annulment of marriage case decided by poor Justice Minita Viray ChicoNazario (Puno, Austria-Martinez, Callejo, Sr., and Tinga, JJ., concur), to wit:
[http://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/oct2004/gr_158896_2004.html G.R. NO. 158896 October 27, 2004 JUANITA CARATING-SIAYNGCO, petitioner, vs. MANUEL SIAYNGCO, respondent. CHICO-NAZARIO, J.]

d) JBC members including Capacites office received the hard copy of the 2004 Decision. For this reason, the JBC repeatedly rejected this sick Judges multiple Applications for the CA position, inter alia, until he retired due to frustrations in his shackled sexual life. Capacite told Oppositor that it is only a Certiorari case, and not even a ground for disqualification under JBC-009, for it is not an administrative case and it is no longer pending; e) Oppositor told Capacite that as a lawyer, she should know that the annulment immorality final Judgment against this mentally-sexually sick Judge CJ candidate is not only a disqualification but even a bar under JBC-009 JBC009 RULE - CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT Rule 2 - SECTION 1. Qualifications and Sec. 5, Disqualifications; f) Capacite wrote the SC case docket Number, and then, she opened the copy of this sick Judges Personal Data Sheet. She read the entered annulment of Judgment case. Then she lectured upon Oppositor on the JBC processes, that Oppositor must file an Opposition, then, this sick Judge would be entitled to Reply within 5 days, and would even be allowed to explain in the Panel Interview his sick and traumatic position; g) Oppositor demanded that Capacite should furnish copy of her written Report to alert the JBC members on this sick Judge, within 24 hours, due to
2

urgency, considering that this mentally disturbed Nominee would be Interviewed on July 25, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. But Capacite was stubborn, even citing R.A. 6713, that she has 15 days to respond and inform Oppositor; h) Oppositor asked her to reconsider her ruling, but she remained impertinent and even demonstrated her gross misconduct and disrespect to Oppositor, a Judge and Lawyer, whom she must pay homage to, under the Code of Professional Responsibity, and her lawyers Oath of office, to give justice to every man; i) Oppositor further showed and furnished her (as evidenced by the rubber stamp mark JBC secretariat receipt by her staff) copy of the G.R. No. 202465, filed on July 18, 2012, 4:30 p.m. "Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. vs. The Judicial and Bar Council" - 68-page - SC VERY URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (page 1 & Receipt, Annex 2). j) Capacite said that she has yet to read the 2004 annulment decision, informing Oppositor that is is too long and she needs time. Oppositor objected since the latter already read the pertinent parts to her, and the Nazario Decision is very short. Capacite refused to grant Oppositors request for her to file a written report to the JBC members so that this sick Judge would not be included in the January 25, 2012 2 p.m. Televised Panel Interview; k) Finally, Oppositor told Capacity that the former reserves his right to file a Disbarment case against her, so that pending the proceedings she could be placed under preventive suspension by the Court. Legal and Constitutional Grounds

2. Respondents Cesar L. Villanueva, Retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (Manuel de Jesus Siayngco), Amado D. Valdez, Vicente R. Velasquez, and Maria Carolina T. Legarda, should be disqualified from the selection process for at least three main reasons: a) they lack the necessary experiences when it comes to cases involving public interest, sensitive, high profile or landmark cases, b) they cannot get the respect of SC Justices and the legal community, do not possess the moral qualifications to hold the position of chief justice, and c) they do not possess the competence, integrity and probity of the Chief Justice position, as required under Article VIII of the Constitution.

I.

Petitioner accuses JBC Executive Officer, inter alia, Atty. Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite of a) gross ignorance of the law, b) gross incompetence and c) gross disregard of JBC-009 & the 1987 Constitution, c) violation of her lawyers oath of office and d) professional indiscretion. She should be disciplined and/or removed from service because of palpable and culpable violations the Constitution and of R.A. 6713, inter alia. JBC Member Cayosa announced on TV that she/the JBC would review the resume of CJ candidates, as basis for inclusion in the JBC Long List. On the other hand, Capacite, by virtue of her office, should have carefully studied the Personal Data Sheets of the 22 candidates. Capacite miserably failed. Because of her actuations-ommisions, the JBC and its secretarial, through her bad faith and incompetence, inter alia, included in the 22-CJ List, retired Malolos City, Bulacan RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (a Supreme Court 2004 annulment J. Nazario Decision finally pronounced shackled, sick man-psychotic and a sex pervert-philanderer, who endured and suffered through his turbulent and loveless marriage to his wife for twenty-two (22) years, and who was repeatedly rejected by the JBC in his CA Applications before retirement), who has and had no integrity, probity and independence.
Petitioner personally met retired Malolos City RTC Judge

Manuel Siaynco or Manuel de Jesus Siayngco about 2 times: a) in his court sala at Br. 6, RTC, Malolos and b) at South Supermarket, Malolos City. In the annulment case he filed, the Court ruled with finality: This is a petition for review on certiorari of the decision of the Court of Appeals promulgated on 01 July 2003, reversing the decision of the RTC, Branch 102, Quezon City, dated 31 January 2001, which dismissed the petition for declaration of nullity of marriage filed by respondent herein Judge Manuel Siayngco ("respondent Manuel"). In her Answer, petitioner Juanita alleged that respondent Manuel is still living with her at their conjugal home in Malolos, Bulacan; that he invented malicious stories against her so that he could be free to marry his paramour; In her defense, petitioner Juanita denied respondent Manuels allegations. She insisted that they were a normal couple who had their own share of fights; that they were happily married until respondent Manuel started having extra-marital affairs which he had admitted to her. She talked about her spouse, "My husband is kind, a good provider, cool, intelligent but a liar, masamang magalit at gastador. In spite of what he has done to me, I take care of him whenever he is sick. He is having extra marital affairs because he wants to have a child. I believe that our biggest problem is not having a child. It is his obsession to have a child with his girl now. He started his relationship with this girl in 1994. I even saw them together in the car. I think that it was the girl who encouraged him to file the petition." She feels that the problems in the relationship is "paulit-ulit," but, that she still is willing to pursue it.
4

Overall, she feels that he is a good spouse and that he is not really psychologically incapacitated. He apparently told her, "You and Jeremy should give me a chance to have a new family." She answered and said, "Ikaw tinuruan mo akong to fight for my right. Ipaglalaban ko ang marriage natin. What emerges from the psychological report of Dr. Garcia as well as from the testimonies of the parties and their witnesses is that the only essential marital obligation which respondent Manuel was not able to fulfill, if any, is the obligation of fidelity. Sexual infidelity, per se, however, does not constitute psychological incapacity within the contemplation of the Family Code. It must be shown that respondent Manuels unfaithfulness is a manifestation of a disordered personality which makes him completely unable to discharge the essential obligations of the marital state and not merely due to his ardent wish to have a child of his own flesh and blood. In herein case, respondent Manuel has admitted that: "I had [extramarital] affairs because I wanted to have a child at that particular point." On the contrary, the report clearly shows that the root cause of petitioner Juanitas behavior is traceable not from the inception of their marriage as required by law but from her experiences during the marriage, e.g., her in-laws disapproval of her as they wanted their son to enter the priesthood, her husbands philandering, admitted no less by him, and her inability to conceive. Thus, from the totality of the evidence adduced by both parties, we have been allowed a window into the Siayngcoss life and have perceived therefrom a simple case of a married couple drifting apart, becoming strangers to each other, with the husband consequently falling out of love and wanting a way out. We are not downplaying the frustration and misery respondent Manuel might be experiencing in being shackled, so to speak, to a marriage that is no longer working. Regrettably, there are situations like this one, where neither law nor society can provide the specific answers to every individual problem. WHEREFORE, the petition for review is hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated 01 July 2003 of the Court of Appeals is hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The Decision dated 31 January 2001 of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 102 is reinstated and given full force and effect.
[http://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/oct2004/gr_158896_2004.html G.R. NO. 158896 October 27, 2004 JUANITA CARATING-SIAYNGCO, petitioner, vs. MANUEL SIAYNGCO, respondent. CHICO-NAZARIO, J.]

Bakit hindi na n Capacite tigilan itong 3 Duende. Gawin niya ang kaniyang mga trabaho! Open Google search engine, type the name of each of the 22 candidates before submitting to the JBC members, its Chair, its exofficio Secretary and entire Secretariat, her written recommendations and findings on the qualifications and disqualifications, if any, of the 22 CJ candidates for Panel Interview, the JBC Long List. Ilan and tauhan ni Capacite? Hindi ba duty niya iyanb iyan sampu ng kanilang mga tauhan ayon sa

kaniyang Lawyers Oath of Office, Code of Professional Responsibility, Revised Administrative Code, Code of Conduct for SC Court personnel at R.A. 6713? If only Capacite, would direct her staff and teach herself - kung na-type lang niya in Google search engine the name Judge Manuel Siaynco, she need not review his Personal Data Sheet. Lalabas kaagad itong Annulment Judgment of Poor Justice Nazario. Petitioner graciously borrows, with attribution from Ateneo de Manila University professor, TV5 anchor Danton Remoto (Remoto Control) these descriptive words for Capacite: IQ below sea level. This incompetent executive officer is therefore, demonstrated by Oppositor to have committed a) gross ignorance of the law, b) gross incompetence, c) gross professional indiscretion, and d) gross disregard of JBC-009 & 1987 Constitution. She should be disciplined, placed under preventive suspension, and/or removed from service because of palpable and culpable violations the Constitution and of R.A. 6713, inter alia. How can the Filipino nation trust the JBC? On September 19, 1995, Justice Campos, for 20 minutes did curse JBC member, Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison, accusing her of being a conduit of politicians. Sino pa ba ang magtitiwala dito sa JBC, kung isasali sa Televised Panel Interview itong may toyo, may topak at sayad na si Judge Manuel Siayngco (na inadmit na may babae siya at pilit na gustong magka-anak doon sa Kerida niya)? Sasabihin nila, e mag-file kayo ng opposition. Pero, i-Interviewhin siya ng JBC at televised pa ito. Alam mo Capacite, sana maniwala ka sa Karma, open-read the Bible, and you will then stop from blaming the 3 dwarves (accusing Oppositor Judge Floro of Psychosis and calling him a dismissed Judge, and repeatedly accusing Oppositor of being guilty of gross ignorance of the law, and fined P 40,000, therefore disqualified by JBC-009 in JBC Applications): balik sa iyo ang Sumpa! Look what happened to JBC member Conrado J Castro, Rod Nazario and Leo Dacera III (at dami dami pa dyan Nimfa Cuesta Vilches, JBC consultant Alfredo L. Benipayo, JBC exofficio members, Nani Perez, Cayetano, Santiago, Gonzalez, and a Long List of those who tasted what Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. promised and prayed for in his 2 Churches for Oppositor (Annex 1) Divine Retribution or Vindication by the Almighty!
6

Capacite is a rare breed of crab mentality Filipinos - like IBP President Anselmo Cadiz, PJA President Romeo F. Barza, Ateneo Law Schiool ALAFI Renato C. Corona, JBC Member Justice Raoul Victorino & Alicia Austria-Martinez (who retired due to illness), the Icons of hypocrisy, who never know and knew the essence of fairness and kindness, the 2 ingredients of Justice. Capacite and these most powerful cursed officers, live in the land of fruits and nuts, as conduits of politicians to serve their foolish ambitions. Ateneo Law School never lectured to its Alumni, the essence of St. Ignatius Ratio Studiorum and the Spiritual Exercises. Si Capacite, basta na lang ibinasura ang Application ni Judge Floro, at hindi man lang binasa ang tungkol kay Judge Manuel Siayngco. Nakakahiya! Just imagine, televised pa naman ito. And this sick man wants to lead the Judiciary? Atty. Rico Paolo in his July 13, 2012 complaint-opposition states: We cannot cherry-pick our morality. The same lofty legal and moral standards that were applied in unseating a Chief Justice should likewise be bases in naming a new one; That, or irreversibly erode the faith and confidence of our countrymenthe bedrock of credibility and respectability upon which stands any and all democratic institutionsin the Judiciary. [http://www.philstar.com/nation/article.aspx? publicationsubcategoryid=200&articleid=827117 Corona lawyer to JBC: De Lima has no integrity By Christina Mendez Home July 13, 2012 04:09 PM] Oppositor further alerts this Council, on a desperate attempt by the same IBP (who threw in the waste can Petitioner Judge Floros 2004 Appeals I and II) to mind control the JBC selection process and the forthcoming JBC final voting-recommendation of the Supreme Court. In the name of hypocrisy, the IBP, who cannot even change the SWS Judicial corruption findings, would now, convene to cook another dish of Injustice, inside the heartless persona of Victorino and Martinez: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/229461/ibp-next-chief-justice-should-not-be-aquino %E2%80%99s-%E2%80%98puppet%E2%80%99

IBP: Next Chief Justice should not be Aquinos puppet By Tetch Torres INQUIRER.net Monday, July 16th, 2012 MANILA, Philippines Legal experts on Monday stressed on the need for a Chief Justice that is not a puppet of the President. Once a puppet, always a puppet, New Era College of Law Dean Abraham Espejo said during the IBP Forum on defining the best candidate for the next Chief Justice. IBP stands for Integrated Bar of the Philippines, a national organization of lawyers. Dean of Philippine Christian University College of Law retired Sandiganbayan Justice Raoul Victorino said President Benigno Aquino III must not only hold true to constitutional mandate in making selection, but should also choose one of resolute principles. The next CJ must be unwavering in defending the independence of judiciary, Raoul Victorino said. The forum, attended by retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Alicia Austria-Martinez and other deans of various law schools, was held a week before the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) conducts public interview of candidates for the top Supreme Court position. The JBC has been encouraging the public to participate in choosing the next Chief Justice. It was also the first time that the JBC interview will be covered live by the media. http://businessmirror.com.ph/home/regions/29943-ibp-meets-to-setrules-for-short-list-of-chief-justice-candidates IBP meets to set rules for short list of Chief Justice candidates SUNDAY, 15 JULY 2012 19:09 JOEL SAN JUAN LEGAL luminaries are expected to gather on Monday in a forum arranged by the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) to come up with proposed criteria and standards for consideration by the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) of a short list of nominees for the Chief Justice post left vacant by the impeachment of former Chief Justice Renato Corona. IBP National President Roan Libarios said expected to participate in the high-level forum are retired justices of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, as well as deans of different law schools. The consultation will be held at the JBL Reyes Hall, IBP Building in Ortigas, Pasig City. The IBP is the mandatory organization of lawyers in the country with the purpose created in 1970 to elevate the standards of the legal profession, to improve the administration of justice, and to enable the bar discharge its public responsibility more effectively. *****On January 25, 2005, and on December 10, 2006, Philippines Social Weather Stations released the results of its two surveys on corruption in the judiciary; it published that: a) like 1995, 1/4 of lawyers said many/very many judges are corrupt. But (49%) stated that a judges received bribes, just 8% of lawyers admitted they reported the bribery, because they could not prove it.
8

[Tables 8-9]; judges, however, said, just 7% call many/very many judges as corrupt[Tables 10-11];b) "Judges see some corruption; proportions who said many/very many corrupt judges or justices: 17% in reference to RTC judges, 14% to MTC judges, 12% to Court of Appeals justices, 4% i to Shari'a Court judges, 4% to Sandiganbayan justices and 2% in reference to Supreme Court justices [Table 15].

II.

Oppositor accuses Cesar L. Villanueva of walang puso a man who is unworthy of being called an Ignatian Alumni.
3. The following excepts from Oppositors 131-page document is

reproduced as part hereof, to support the Opposition against this man who is heartless. He is in the wrong place. Sayang ang talino niya, CPA at Law topnotcher, rich and famous. Ilan pa ang mga kamukha niyang, nakaukit sa Bibliya na the rich will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven! Ilang Ateneo topnotchers at Valedictorians na kamukha niya ang nagdudusa na ngayon sa naglalagablab na Apoy? If Villanueva would be allowed to be the Leader of the nations Judicial Department, ilang Judge Floro at mga kawawang mga litigants sa Corte and magbibilang ng butiki at poste ng meralco? Hanggang kailian pa madedisyunan at matutuldukan ang Floro & the 3 duende case? A stern warning to Villanueva:

July 20, 1999 July 20, 2012 14 Years Jobless Judge in Pretend World: Cesar L. Villanueva meets the 3 Duendes, 2004
I curse the day that Cesar L. Villanueva sat near my chair, in Taxation II (Prof. Exequiel Javiers class, 1980). Mark my word, you, like Justice Minita Viray Chico-Nazario, will regret it! I suffered enough, enough and enough, since you would not lift a finger to help me, spare the Filipino nation!
9

Notes: "OCAD vs. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.", A.M. NO. RTJ-99-1460 http://www.scribd.com/doc/80446796 https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx? cid=E76BFFF86F9A213F&resid=E76BFFF86F9A213F!309 Pages 10-17 II. A Letter of a Healing Judge to the Chief Justice Dear Chief Justice Corona, Xxx Cesar L. Villanueva, CLV+ On March 1 & 17, 2004, I obtained 2 letters-appeals from my classmate, Fr. Romeo Archie Intengan, SJ & Fr. Bernas, SJ, respectively, after the Ateneo ALAFI, PJA, IBP and all those legal Escribas threw my on bended knees supplications in polluted rivers. Then, it was a saddest afternoon of April, 2004, when my Taxation II Classmate Cesar L. Villanueva changed many lives: Villanueva: Ang problema sa mga predictions mo, mga matatandang Justices ang nagkakasakit Dean Bernas already gave you a letter, I am just his successor Floro: Masasaksihan ng buong Ateneo at nang hudicatura ang operasyon ng pinakabatang Mahistrado I am asking you to write a letter to the Court not as a Dean, but as my own classmate in Tax II, as Fr. Intengan, SJ did. Villanueva: I am not your classmate! Floro: Exequiel Javier gave me the 2nd highest grade of 85% while you got the highest, 91% as classmates in Tax II, 3 times a week, I used to see you using a yellow pad paper! (Annex A) Villanueva, until his death will never ever forget, that even if he dreams forever, the door of the SC Golden throne had already been locked during that darkest afternoon: Ipinagpag ko na po ang aking mga paa, I cursed Ateneo Law School! Sa lahat po ng ito, in your lifetime, in your short term, in their fate and in the sufferings of the Filipino nation, I state that the April 12, 2011 SC En Banc GRANT Pink Resolution is already embedded in the Halls of Immortality in the tabernacle of Justice in the farthest mountain in outer space. The Impeachment and its outcome had already been deliberated by LUIS, Armand and Angel presided by the Angel of Death at Osaka, Japan, Jupiter, Bustos, Dam, Maria Aurora & Baler, Aurora. Pax Christi sit simper nobiscum. Amen.+ Gumagalang, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., The Sole Holder of the Ultimate PINK Light.
10

III.

Oppositor accuses Amado D. Valdez, Vicente R. Velasquez, and Maria Carolina T. Legarda of nangangarap ng gising. Joke, joke and joke: the Chief Justice Post is not for you not for the 3 stooges, Period. You are wasting the time of Filipino journalists and the JBC members. You are making them idiot-savants, that is, Dolphy ghosts.
3. If Oppositor would be obliged to submit hereunder specifics

of the Amado D. Valdez, Vicente R. Velasquez, and Maria Carolina T. Legarda trilogy disqualifications, the JBC might think that the 3 are serious Nominees and that, ergo, the Council must prepare and study so that the trios lives would be scrutinized. But common sense dictates that: a) the JBC is under the supervision of the Court, b) these 3 stooges could not even get 1 or even 1/3 vote from the SC final recommendation for submission to the JBC, and c) wala silang mga K, walang mga utak manok man lang para sa Posisyon (hindi Brendamage ni Miriam who told the nation that she would spit at the face of Chief Justice Panganiban, when she was terrorized by the Court in entering the NO VACANCY CJ job: Alis dyan, Miriam! Oppositor tells Amado D. Valdez, Vicente R. Velasquez, and Maria Carolina T. Legarda Go to the Movies! (plagiarizing Santiagos immortal words to FPJ during the 2004 Election canvass SC cases). Relief PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is respectfully prayed to this Honorable Judicial and Bar Council, to CONSIDER, NOTE, GIVE DUE COURSE and GRANT the instant Urgent Verified Oppositions To the Nominations-Applications of CJ Candidates: 1.) Cesar L. Villanueva, 2.) Retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (Manuel de Jesus Siayngco), 3.) Amado D. Valdez, 4.) Vicente R. Velasquez, and 5.) Maria Carolina T. Legarda, and Urgent Verified Motions 1.) To Exclude from the July 25, 2012 2-5 p.m. Televised Panel Interview, Retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (Manuel de Jesus Siayngco - adjudged with finality as philanderer, immoral, shackled, by the
11

2004 G.R. NO. 158896 Justice Minita Viray-Chico Nazario annulment of marriage Decision in Juanita Siaynco vs. Judge Manuel Siaynco, 2.) To Expunge from the JBC records and file, the Opposition of Lauro Visconde (co-conspirator) and Dante Jimenez (guilty of another indirect contempt and palpable forum-shopping to reverse his SC final punishment-fine for Indirect Contempt); it is triffling with the Courts, contrary to the elementary principles of right dealing and good faith." (People vs. Acierto, 92 Phil. 534), 3) To Consider the Quezon City prosecutors office (Fiscal Donald Lee) 1995 National Health Insurance Act filed criminal case against Lauro Visconde, as International Broadcasting Co. (IBC) Director (who was given the job, since Visconde has no visible means of support), 4) To Direct Atty. Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite, JBC Executive Officer, to file Comment (R.A. 6713, inter alia, and furnish copy) to Oppositors Formal Complaint against her f a) gross ignorance of the law, b) gross incompetence and c) gross disregard of JBC-009 & the 1987 Constitution, d) violation of her lawyers oath of office and e) professional indiscretion. in view of the extraordinary circumstances above-submitted. Other reliefs and remedies, just and equitable under the circumstances are likewise prayed for. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I signed this pleading, Verified Oppositions and Motions, this 20th day, of July, 2012, at Malolos City, 3000 Bulacan, Philippines for Manila, Metro Manila. Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., Applicant-Oppositor, [ Cel. # 0915-8308816 ] c/o Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020, Bulacan
[I.D. Number: RTCJ-317 / EDP Number: 38676300; ROLL OF ATTORNEYS NO. 32800, Pg. No. 60, Book No. XIV].

VERIFICATION & CERTIFICATION OF NON-FORUM SHOPPING

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) Malolos City, BULACAN ) S.S. I, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., Oppositor-Applicant, under oath, depose/say, that: I am the Applicant-Oppositor in this case. I caused the preparation, signed and read the instant pleading, and all the contents/allegations thereof are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records. I CERTIFY (a) that I have not theretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of my knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein; the A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr), is totally different from this and is no longer pending, in so far as the finality is concerned (except the matter of collection of backwages to execute the Resolution, inter alia) since the SC En Banc Resolution of April 12, 2012 has not been appealed and is final and executory; (b) if there is such other pending action or claim, I will file a complete statement of the present status thereof, but there is none; and (c) if I should thereafter learn that the same or similar action or claim has been 12

filed or is pending, I shall report that fact within five (5) days therefrom to the court wherein his aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this Friday the 13th, July, 2012, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 20011.

VERIFICATION / AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) Malolos City, BULACAN ) S.S. I, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., Applicant, Oppositor, under oath, depose/say, that: I am the Applicant-Oppositor, I caused the preparation, signed and read the instant pleading and letter, and all the contents/allegations thereof are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records. I CERTIFY that on July 20, 2012, I personally served copies of this pleadingletter with all annexes by personal service upon the following
Chair Justice DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA Hon. FRANCIS JOSEPH G. ESCUDERO Hon. NIEL C. TUPAS JR. Hon. JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Hon. ENRIQUETA ESGUERRA VIDAL Hon. REGINO C. HERMOSISIMA JR.

Hon. JOSE V. MEJIA

Hon. AURORA SANTIAGO LAGMAN

Hon. MARIA MILAGROS N. FERNAN-CAYOSA c/o and thru the The JBC Secretariat: Atty. ANNALIZA S. TY-CAPACITE, BC Executive Officer

That on July 20, 2012, I served copies of this Opposition-Motions with annexes in accordance with Rule 13, inter alia, of the Revised Rules of Court, by delivering personally a copy to the party or JBC secretariat, by leaving it in its office with his clerk or with a person having charge thereof, as evidenced by the rubber stamp marks of the office herewith as proved by the rubber stamp receipts/their signatures hereunder on the original copy hereof, in accordance with Rule 13, Rules of Court.
.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.

13

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this this 20th day, of July, 2012, at Malolos City, 3000 Bulacan, Philippines for Manila, Metro Manila, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2011. DOC. NO. 191, PAGE NO. 40, BOOK NO. 96, SERIES OF 2012. BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public, Until Jan.31, 2012, PTR NO. 7960111, 12- 2811, Atty.s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 852362, 1-2,12 MCLE COMP. III-0019636, 12- 21-10 2nd Floor, BPSTA Bldg., Provincial Compound, Malolos City, Bulacan, (044) 662-5335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary Susana Abac.

COPY FURNISHED-SERVED: (By Personal Service):

Chair Justice DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA Hon. FRANCIS JOSEPH G. ESCUDERO Hon. NIEL C. TUPAS JR. Hon. JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Hon. ENRIQUETA ESGUERRA VIDAL Hon. REGINO C. HERMOSISIMA JR.

Hon. JOSE V. MEJIA

Hon. AURORA SANTIAGO LAGMAN

Hon. MARIA MILAGROS N. FERNAN-CAYOSA c/o and thru the The JBC Secretariat: Atty. ANNALIZA S. TY-CAPACITE, BC Executive Officer That on July 20, 2012, I served copies of this Opposition-Motions with annexes in accordance with Rule 13, inter alia, of the Revised Rules of Court, by delivering personally a copy to the party or JBC secretariat, by leaving it in its office with his clerk or with a person having charge thereof, as evidenced by the rubber stamp marks of the office herewith as proved by the rubber stamp receipts/their signatures hereunder on the original copy hereof, in accordance with Rule 13, Rules of Court.

14

Supreme Court Associate Justices, Manila. Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. Note: Oppositor chose the trilogy of Amado D. Valdez, Vicente R. Velasquez, and Maria Carolina T. Legarda not at random or by coincidence, but for a reason: Legarda is too dangerous to be a CJ (Kung ano ang puno, ganoon ang dulo!), while Valdez and Velasquez do not have a right whatsoever to be Interviewed vis--vis Antonio T. Carpio (scheduled at 9-12 a.m., July 26, 2012). Hes an adult...I have nothing to do with it -Atty. Katrina Legarda on son, director Rafa Santos' spat with theater community Published: Jul 4, 2011 - 9:37am (SPOT.ph) When asked by a PEP.ph correspondent about her son Cinemalaya director Rafa Santos predicament involving the theater community, family lawyer and womens rights advocate Katrina Legarda only had two answers: Hes an adult and I have nothing to do with it. Legarda was at the Main Theater of the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) to watch the musical The Music of Andrew Lloyd Webber on July 2 when she was asked to comment on Santos controversial remark about his preference to work with theater actors because "they could be fed Skyflakes and be paid in cat food." The lawyer replied, Hes an adult. She repeated the answer when asked how the incident affected her.

15