KUESIONER PENELITIAN DETERMINAN KINERJA KADER POSYANDU DALAM MENUJU REVITALISASI POSYANDU DI KECAMATAN PANTAI LABU KABUPATEN DELI

SERDANG TAHUN 2009 No responden :.......................

I. KARAKTERISTIK INDIVIDU KADER POSYANDU 1) 2) Umur Responden Pendidikan Terakhir a. Tamat SD b. Tamat SLTP c. Tamat SLTA d. Tamat D-3/S-1 3) Pekerjaan Kader a. Ibu Rumah Tangga b. PNS c. Wiraswasta : ................ Tahun (Sebutkan)

II. MOTIVASI KADER (INSENTIF/JASA dan TANGGUNG JAWAB) Jawaban TP CP SP

No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07

Pernyataan A. Insentif (Jasa) Insentif diterima setiap 3-6 bulan sekali Insentif hanya dalam bentuk transportasi saja Insentif/jasa yang diterima disesuaikan dengan tingkat pendidikan Insentif yang diterima disesuaikan dengan beban kerja Mendapatkan dana yang bersumber dari dana JAMKESMAS Mendapatkan tambahan insentif dari iuran masyarakat Kader menerima JPKMS

Keterangan: TP : Tidak Puas; CP=Cukup Puas dan SP= Sangat Puas.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Tabel Pertanyaan motivasi lanjutan No Pernyataan Jawaban S K TP

B. Tanggung Jawab 01 Mempersiapkan peralatan terlebih dahulu sebelum hari buka posyandu 02 Memperhatikan kenyamanan dan kebersihan ruangan posyandu 03 04 05 06 Mencatat dan mendengarkan setiap informasi dan keluhan masyarakat dalam kegiatan posyandu Membantu dan melaksanakan tugas sebagai kader posyandu Menyediakan waktu setiap ada jadwal posyandu Menjalankan tugas secara sukarela dan ikhlas

Keterangan : S=Sering; K=Kadang-kadang, dan TP=Tidak Pernah VARIABEL KINERJA Sebelum hari HPosyandu Apakah Ibu melaksanakan beberapa kegiatan? (1) 1. Menyiapkan tempat pelaksanaan, peralatan, 1. Ya sarana dan prasarana, PMT sebelum posyandu 2. Tidak (2) dimulai. 2. Memberitahukan warga adanya kegiatan di 1. Ya (1) posyandu? 2. Tidak (2) 3. Mendata jumlah sasaran Ibu hamil, WUS, PUS, Ibu menyusui, Ibu balita, dan sasaran UPGK yang ada diwilayah posyandu binaan Ibu? 4. Melaksanakan pendaftaran pengunjung Posyandu balita dan ibu hamil. 1. Ya (1) 2. Tidak (2) 1. Ya (1) 2. Tidak (2)

Sebelum hari HPosyandu Apakah ibu?

(1) 5. Melakukan penimbangan balita dan Ibu hamil 1. Ya 2. Tidak (2) yang berkunjung ke posyandu? 6. Melakukan penimbangan balita dan Ibu hamil 1. Ya (1) yang berkunjung ke posyandu? 2. Tidak (2) 7. melakukan kegiatan penyuluhan kesehatan dan 1. Ya (1) gizi serta pemberian PMT bila menemukan 2. Tidak (2) balita Bbnya BGM ? 8. Membantu memberikan pelayanan kesehatan : 1. Ya (1) KB, imunisasi, Fe, Oralit dan obat-obatan 2. Tidak (2) lainnya bersama petugas kesehatan di Posyandu kepada pengunjung Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

(1) 9. Mencatat di secarik kertas yang diselipkan 1. Ya kedalam KMS/ buku KIA setelah menimbang 2. Tidak (2) balita dan Ibu hamil kemudian baru mencatat hasilnya di KMS/ buku KIA dan mengisi buku register ? (1) 10. Memberikan PMT dan penyuluhan kesehatan 1. Ya 2. Tidak (2) bila menemukan balita KEP? (1) 11. Melakukan konsultasi kepada petugas 1. Ya kesehatan bila menemukan balita sudah 3 (tiga) 2. Tidak (2) kali berturut-turut BBnya tidak naik ? Setelah hari HPosyandu Apakah ibu? 12. Merapikan tempat posyandu, pencatatan dan evaluasi kegiatan (1) melengkapi 1. Ya 2. Tidak (2)

(1) 13. Membuat grafik SKDN jumlah semua balita 1. Ya yang ada di wilayah binaan posyandu. S : 2. Tidak (2) Jumlah balita yang mempunyai KMS/ buku KIA. (1) 14. Melakukan tindak lanjut dan kunjungan rumah 1. Ya kepada sasaran yang tidak datang ke posyandu? 2. Tidak (2) (1) 15. Melakukan tatap muka ke tokoh masyarakat 1. Ya setempat dan menghadiri pertemuan rutin 2. Tidak (2) organisasi keagamaan dalam masyarakat seperti pengajian, wirit, arisan dan lain-lain.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 2 HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA PENELITIAN VALIDITAS DAN REABILITAS VARIABEL INSENTIF

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ****** _
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S S C A L E (A L P H A)

Mean 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. INSENT1 INSENT2 INSENT3 INSENT4 INSENT5 INSENT6 INSENT7 2.5000 2.7000 2.5000 2.2000 2.4000 2.3000 2.3000

Std Dev .7071 .4830 .7071 .6325 .6992 .6749 .6749

Cases 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 N of Variables 7

Statistics for SCALE

Mean 16.9000

Variance 16.9889

Std Dev 4.1218

Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted INSENT1 INSENT2 INSENT3 INSENT4 INSENT5 INSENT6 INSENT7 14.4000 14.2000 14.4000 14.7000 14.5000 14.6000 14.6000 Scale Variance if Item Deleted 11.8222 13.9556 11.8222 12.9000 12.0556 12.4889 12.9333 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation .9597 .7758 .9597 .8120 .9154 .8478 .7416

Alpha if Item Deleted .9429 .9592 .9429 .9550 .9467 .9523 .9608

Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = .9584 10.0 N of Items = 7

Universitas Sumatera Utara

VARIABEL TANGGUNG JAWAB

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ****** _

R E L I A B I L I T Y A)

A N A L Y S I S

S C A L E

(A L P H

Mean 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. TGGJWB1 TGGJWB2 TGGJWB3 TGGJWB4 TGGJWB5 TGGJWB6 2.3000 2.4000 2.2000 2.4000 2.3000 2.5000

Std Dev .6749 .6992 .6325 .6992 .6749 .7071

Cases 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 N of Variables 6

Statistics for SCALE

Mean 14.1000

Variance 12.9889

Std Dev 3.6040

Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted TGGJWB1 TGGJWB2 TGGJWB3 TGGJWB4 TGGJWB5 TGGJWB6 11.8000 11.7000 11.9000 11.7000 11.8000 11.6000 Scale Variance if Item Deleted 9.2889 8.9000 9.8778 8.9000 9.2889 8.4889 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation .7886 .8629 .6820 .8629 .7886 .9708

Alpha if Item Deleted .9360 .9270 .9477 .9270 .9360 .9130

Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = .9423 10.0 N of Items = 6

VARIABEL KINERJA KADER POSYANDU

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******

Universitas Sumatera Utara

R E L I A B I L I T Y

A N A L Y S I S

S C A L E

(A L P H A)

Mean 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. KINERJA1 KINERJA2 KINERJA3 KINERJA4 KINERJA5 KINERJA6 KINERJA7 KINERJA8 KINERJA9 KINERJ10 KINERJ11 KINERJ12 KINERJ13 KINERJ14 KINERJ15 1.8000 1.7000 1.6000 1.8000 1.7000 1.8000 1.6000 1.8000 1.6000 1.8000 1.8000 1.6000 1.7000 1.7000 1.7000 Variance 34.2333 Scale Variance if Item Deleted 29.6556 30.0000 30.1000 29.6556 29.5556 29.6556 30.1000 29.6556 30.5444 29.6556 29.6556 30.1000 30.0000 29.5556 30.4444
A N A L Y S I S -

Std Dev .4216 .4830 .5164 .4216 .4830 .4216 .5164 .4216 .5164 .4216 .4216 .5164 .4830 .4830 .4830 Std Dev 5.8509

Cases 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 N of Variables 15

Statistics for Mean SCALE 25.7000 Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted KINERJA1 KINERJA2 KINERJA3 KINERJA4 KINERJA5 KINERJA6 KINERJA7 KINERJA8 KINERJA9 KINERJ10 KINERJ11 KINERJ12 KINERJ13 KINERJ14 KINERJ15 23.9000 24.0000 24.1000 23.9000 24.0000 23.9000 24.1000 23.9000 24.1000 23.9000 23.9000 24.1000 24.0000 24.0000 24.0000

Corrected ItemTotal Correlation .9581 .7559 .6824 .9581 .8462 .9581 .6824 .9581 .6996 .9580 .7581 .6824 .7554 .8472 .6670
S C A L E

Alpha if Item Deleted .9635 .9668 .9684 .9635 .9652 .9635 .9684 .9635 .9700 .9635 .9635 .9684 .9668 .9652 .9684
(A L P H A)

R E L I A B I L I T Y

Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 10.0 Alpha = .9681

N of Items = 15

Frequencies

Universitas Sumatera Utara

UMUR Frequency 18 36 54 Percent 33.3 66.7 100.0 Valid Percent 33.3 66.7 100.0 Cumulative Percent 33.3 100.0

Valid

20-30 Tahun 31-40 Tahun Total

DIDIKAN Frequency 18 17 19 54 Percent 33.3 31.5 35.2 100.0 Valid Percent 33.3 31.5 35.2 100.0 Cumulative Percent 33.3 64.8 100.0

Valid

Tamat SD Tamat SLTP Tamat SLTA Total

DIDIK Frequency 36 18 54 Percent 66.7 33.3 100.0 Valid Percent 66.7 33.3 100.0 Cumulative Percent 66.7 100.0

Valid

Sedang Rendah Total

JN_KERJA Frequency 32 8 5 9 54
KERJA Frequency 24 30 54 Percent 44.4 55.6 100.0 Valid Percent 44.4 55.6 100.0 Cumulative Percent 44.4 100.0

Valid

IRT Wiraswasta/Pegawai Swasta PNS Petani/Buruh Total

Percent 59.3 14.8 9.3 16.7 100.0

Valid Percent 59.3 14.8 9.3 16.7 100.0

Cumulative Percent 59.3 74.1 83.3 100.0

Valid

Bekerja Tidak Bekerja Total

Universitas Sumatera Utara

INSENTIF Frequency 8 19 27 54 Percent 14.8 35.2 50.0 100.0

TGG_JWB Frequency 10 19 25 54 Percent 18.5 35.2 46.3 100.0 Valid Percent 18.5 35.2 46.3 100.0 Cumulative Percent 18.5 53.7 100.0

Valid

Baik Sedang Kurang Total

Valid Percent 14.8 35.2 50.0 100.0

Cumulative Percent 14.8 50.0 100.0

Valid

Rendah Sedang Tinggi Total

Motivasi Kader Posyandu Frequency 8 17 29 54 Percent 14.8 31.5 53.7 100.0 Valid Percent 14.8 31.5 53.7 100.0 Cumulative Percent 14.8 46.3 100.0

Valid

Tinggi Sedang Rendah Total

Kinerja Kader Posyandu Frequency 15 10 29 54 Percent 27.8 18.5 53.7 100.0 Valid Percent 27.8 18.5 53.7 100.0 Cumulative Percent 27.8 46.3 100.0

Valid

Baik Sedang Kurang Total

Crosstabs UMUR * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab Kinerja Kader Posyandu Baik Sedang Kurang 7 1 10 5.0 3.3 9.7 38.9% 5.6% 55.6% 46.7% 13.0% 8 10.0 22.2% 53.3% 14.8% 15 15.0 27.8% 100.0% 27.8% 10.0% 1.9% 9 6.7 25.0% 90.0% 16.7% 10 10.0 18.5% 100.0% 18.5% 34.5% 18.5% 19 19.3 52.8% 65.5% 35.2% 29 29.0 53.7% 100.0% 53.7%

Total 18 18.0 100.0% 33.3% 33.3% 36 36.0 100.0% 66.7% 66.7% 54 54.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

UMUR

20-30 Tahun

31-40 Tahun

Total

Count Expected Count % within UMUR % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within UMUR % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within UMUR % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total

Chi-Square Tests Value 3.667a 4.151 .304 54 df 2 2 1 Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .160 .125 .581

Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.

DIDIK * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab Kinerja Kader Posyandu Baik Sedang Kurang 15 6 15 10.0 6.7 19.3 41.7% 16.7% 41.7% 100.0% 27.8% 0 5.0 .0% .0% .0% 15 15.0 27.8% 100.0% 27.8% 60.0% 11.1% 4 3.3 22.2% 40.0% 7.4% 10 10.0 18.5% 100.0% 18.5% 51.7% 27.8% 14 9.7 77.8% 48.3% 25.9% 29 29.0 53.7% 100.0% 53.7%

Total 36 36.0 100.0% 66.7% 66.7% 18 18.0 100.0% 33.3% 33.3% 54 54.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

DIDIK

Sedang

Rendah

Total

Count Expected Count % within DIDIK % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within DIDIK % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within DIDIK % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total

Chi-Square Tests Value 10.614a 15.115 9.530 54 df 2 2 1 Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .005 .001 .002

Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.

KERJA * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab Kinerja Kader Posyandu Baik Sedang Kurang 10 3 11 6.7 4.4 12.9 41.7% 12.5% 45.8% 66.7% 18.5% 5 8.3 16.7% 33.3% 9.3% 15 15.0 27.8% 100.0% 27.8% 30.0% 5.6% 7 5.6 23.3% 70.0% 13.0% 10 10.0 18.5% 100.0% 18.5% 37.9% 20.4% 18 16.1 60.0% 62.1% 33.3% 29 29.0 53.7% 100.0% 53.7%

Total 24 24.0 100.0% 44.4% 44.4% 30 30.0 100.0% 55.6% 55.6% 54 54.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

KERJA

Bekerja

Tidak Bekerja

Total

Count Expected Count % within KERJA % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within KERJA % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within KERJA % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total

Chi-Square Tests Value 4.343a 4.383 2.685 54 df 2 2 1 Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .114 .112 .101

Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.44.

Motivasi Kader Posyandu * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab Kinerja Kader Posyandu Sedang Kurang 5 2 1 2.2 1.5 4.3 25.0% 20.0% 3.7% 2 3.1 11.8% 20.0% 3.7% 6 5.4 20.7% 60.0% 11.1% 10 10.0 18.5% 100.0% 18.5% 12.5% 3.4% 1.9% 8 9.1 47.1% 27.6% 14.8% 20 15.6 69.0% 69.0% 37.0% 29 29.0 53.7% 100.0% 53.7%

Baik Motivasi Kader Posyandu Tinggi Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total Count Expected Count % within Motivasi Kader Posyandu % within Kinerja Kader Posyandu % of Total

Total 8 8.0 100.0% 14.8% 14.8% 17 17.0 100.0% 31.5% 31.5% 29 29.0 100.0% 53.7% 53.7% 54 54.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

62.5% 33.3% 9.3% 7 4.7 41.2% 46.7% 13.0% 3 8.1 10.3% 20.0% 5.6% 15 15.0 27.8% 100.0% 27.8%

Sedang

Rendah

Total

Chi-Square Tests Value 12.344a 13.386 11.018 54 df 4 4 1 Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .015 .010 .001

Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.48.

Regression

Universitas Sumatera Utara

b Variables Entered/Removed

Model 1

Variables Entered Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, a DIDIK

Variables Removed

Method

Enter

a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Model Summary Model 1 R .578a R Square .334 Adjusted R Square .279 Std. Error of the Estimate .741

a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, DIDIK

ANOVAb Model 1 Sum of Squares 13.470 26.901 40.370 df 4 49 53 Mean Square 3.367 .549 F 6.134 Sig. .000a

Regression Residual Total

a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, DIDIK b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 (Constant) UMUR DIDIK KERJA Motivasi Kader Posyandu B -.534 .085 .495 .211 .489 Std. Error .647 .222 .255 .239 .146 Standardized Coefficients Beta .046 .270 .121 .413 t -.825 .383 1.941 .882 3.355 Sig. .413 .703 .009 .382 .002

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara