Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1 Equity Method Accounting $ 80,000,000 (2,000,000) (25,000,000) $ 53,000,000 450,000,000 450,000,000 53,000,000 Equity in net income of Williams Cash Investment in Williams E4.2 Equity Method Income and Working Paper Eliminations 24,000,000 24,000,000 53,000,000
Calculation of Equity in Net Income: Williams reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Plant assets $50,000,000/25 Goodwill impairment loss Equity in net income of Williams Entries made by James during 2010: Investment in Williams Capital stock Investment in Williams
(all amounts in millions) a. Investment balance, 1/1/11 Investment balance, 1/1/10 = $2,000 + $200 Change 2010 dividends 2010 equity income accrual Writeoff of plant asset revaluation = ($160/10) Sabers 2010 net income b. Sabers stockholders equity, 1/1/10 2010 net income 2010 dividends Sabers stockholders equity, 1/1/11 c. Sabers 2011 net income
Extra depreciation on revalued plant assets Equity income accrual d. (C) Equity income accrual Dividends Saber Investment in Saber (E) Stockholders Equity Saber Investment in Saber (R) Plant assets Goodwill Accumulated depreciation Investment in Saber (O) Depreciation expense Accumulated depreciation e.
At the beginning of 2022, the plant assets are fully depreciated and the remaining balance for goodwill is $40 - $30 = $10. (R) Plant assets Goodwill Accumulated depreciation Investment in S Entry (O) is not needed since no revaluations are written off in 2022. 160 10 160 10
E4.3 a.
The acquisition entry is as follows: Investment in Saddlestone Merger expenses Capital stock Contingent consideration liability Cash 10,300,000 250,000 10,000,000 300,000 250,000
Calculation of 2011 Equity in Net Income: Saddlestones reported net income Revaluation writeoff: Identifiable intangibles $2,000,000/5 Equity in net income of Saddlestone Peaks equity method entries for 2011: Investment in Saddlestone Equity in net income of Saddlestone Cash Investment in Saddlestone b. Calculation of goodwill is as follows: 1,000,000 2,600,000
2,600,000 1,000,000
Acquisition cost Book value of Saddlestone Excess of acquisition cost over book value Identifiable intangibles Goodwill Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2011: (C) Equity in net income of Saddlestone Dividends Saddlestone Investment in Saddlestone (E) Stockholders equity Saddlestone, 1/1 Investment in Saddlestone (R) Identifiable intangibles Goodwill Investment in Saddlestone (O) Amortization expense Identifiable intangibles 400,000 2,000,000 1,100,000
7,200,000 7,200,000
3,100,000
400,000
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2010 67
E4.4 a.
Eliminating Entries after First and Second Years Calculation of Equity in net income for 2012: $ 1,600,000 (100,000) (180,000) (50,000) $ 1,270,000
Safecos reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Equipment $500,000/5 Inventory 90% x $200,000 Goodwill impairment loss Equity in net income of Safeco Peerlesss entries for 2012: Investment in Safeco Cash Investment in Safeco Equity in net income of Safeco Cash Investment in Safeco Calculation of goodwill is as follows: Acquisition cost Book value of Safeco Excess of acquisition cost over book value Fair value less book value: Equipment Inventory Goodwill 600,000 1,270,000 8,000,000
8,000,000
1,270,000 600,000
Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2012: (C) Equity in net income of Safeco Dividends Safeco Investment in Safeco (E) Stockholders equitySafeco, 1/1 Investment in Safeco
7,000,000 7,000,000
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2010 69
(R) Equipment, net Inventory Goodwill Investment in Safeco (O) Depreciation expense Cost of goods sold Goodwill impairment loss Equipment, net Inventory Goodwill b. Calculation of Equity in Net Income for 2013:
500,000 200,000 300,000 1,000,000 100,000 180,000 50,000 100,000 180,000 50,000
Safecos reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Equipment $500,000/5 Inventory 10% x $200,000 Equity in net income of Safeco Peerlesss equity method entries for 2013: Investment in Safeco Equity in net income of Safeco Cash Investment in Safeco 800,000 1,880,000
1,880,000 800,000
The Investment in Safeco balance at December 31, 2013 is $8,000,000 + 1,270,000 600,000 + 1,880,000 800,000 = $9,750,000. Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2013: (C) Equity in net income of Safeco Dividends Safeco Investment in Safeco (E) Stockholders equitySafeco, 1/1 Investment in Safeco
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2010 70
8,000,000 8,000,000
Stockholders equitySafeco at 1/1/2013 = $7,000,000 + 1,600,000 600,000 = $8,000,000 (R) Equipment, net Inventory Goodwill Investment in Safeco (O) Depreciation expense Cost of goods sold Equipment, net Inventory E4.5 a. Equity Method, Eliminating Entries, Several Years after Acquisition Calculation of total goodwill is as follows: $ 5,000,000 (2,000,000) 3,000,000 $ 450,000 (400,000) 1,000,000 250,000 100,000 20,000 100,000 20,000 400,000 20,000 250,000 670,000
Acquisition cost Book value of Brussels Excess of acquisition cost over book value Fair value less book value: Land Buildings Identifiable intangibles Long-term debt Goodwill b. Calculation of Equity in net income for 2010:
(1,300,000) $ 1,700,000
Brussels reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Buildings $(400,000)/20 Long-term debt $250,000/10 Goodwill impairment loss Equity in net income of Brussels
c.
Calculation of Investment in Brussels, 12/31/10 $ 5,000,000 3,500,000 (1,000,000) 160,000 (1,000,000) (200,000) (300,000) 6,160,000 345,000 (90,000) $ 6,415,000
Investment in Brussels, 1/1/02 Brussels reported income, 2002-2009 Brussels reported dividends, 2002-2009 Revaluation writeoffs, 2002-2009: Buildings $[(400,000)/20] x 8 Identifiable intangibles (full balance) Long-term debt $[250,000/10] x 8 Goodwill impairment loss Investment in Brussels, 1/1/10 Equity in net income, 2010 Brussels dividends, 2010 Investment in Brussels, 12/31/10 d. Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2010: 345,000 Dividends Brussels Investment in Brussels (E) Stockholders equityBrussels, 1/1
90,000 255,000
4,500,000 Investment in Brussels 4,500,000 Stockholders equity, January 1, 2010 = $2,000,000 + 3,500,000 1,000,000 = $4,500,000. 450,000 50,000 1,400,000
Investment in Brussels 1,660,000 Buildings, net 240,000 Revaluations at January 1, 2010 = original revaluations less writeoffs for 2002-2009. (O) Interest expense Buildings, net Goodwill impairment loss Long-term debt Depreciation expense Goodwill 25,000 20,000 50,000 25,000 20,000 50,000
E4.6
Calculation of total goodwill is as follows: Acquisition cost Book value of Baker Excess of acquisition cost over book value Fair value less book value: Buildings Goodwill Calculation of Equity in Net Income for 2011: Bakers reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Buildings $1,000,000/25 Goodwill impairment loss Equity in net income of Baker Calculation of Investment balance at December 31, 2011: Investment in Baker, 12/31/04 Baker reported income, 2005-2010 Baker reported dividends, 2005-2010 Revaluation writeoffs, 2005-2010: Buildings ($1,000,000/25) x 6 Investment in Baker, 1/1/11 Equity in net income, 2011 Dividends, 2011 Investment in Baker, 12/31/11 Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2011: (C) Equity in net income of Baker Dividends Baker Investment in Baker (E) Stockholders equityBaker, 1/1 5,900,000 160,000 100,000 60,000 $ 7,500,000 1,300,000 (400,000) (240,000) 8,160,000 160,000 (100,000) $ 8,220,000 $ 300,000 $ 7,500,000 (5,000,000) 2,500,000 (1,000,000) $ 1,500,000
Investment in Baker 5,900,000 Stockholders equity, January 1, 2011 = $5,000,000 + 1,300,000 400,000 = $5,900,000.
760,000 1,500,000
Investment in Baker 2,260,000 Revaluations at January 1, 2011 = original revaluations less writeoffs for 2005-2010. (O) Depreciation expense Goodwill impairment loss Buildings, net Goodwill E4.7 Goodwill Impairment Losses 40,000 100,000 40,000 100,000
a. Goodwill is not a standalone asset, but represents the value of above-average future performance potential that cannot be assigned to identifiable assets such as property or specific intangible assets. Because performance potential is related to business operations, to measure impairments in its value it must be connected with a specific business unit. In the case of Time Warner, as discussed in the text of Chapter 4, goodwill is assigned to Networks as a business unit. The WB Network is one part of this business unit, but does not comprise the entire unit. b. Goodwill impairment testing is accomplished in two steps. First, the fair value of the business unit is compared with its book value. If book value exceeds fair value, we go on to the second step to determine the amount of the impairment, if any. The second step compares the fair value of the goodwill with its carrying value. An impairment loss is reported if its carrying value exceeds its fair value. Since The WB Network was shut down, its future performance potential will no longer benefit Time Warner, and the impairment charge is appropriate. c. Time Warner has a 50% interest in The CW, so under U.S. GAAP it does not have a controlling interest and reports its investment using the equity method. Time Warners equity in the net income of The CW is reported as part of consolidated other income. The investment balance is reported as part of consolidated assets. The CWs individual assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are not reported on the consolidated financial statements.
E4.8
80,000 18,000
Investment in Samson 98,000 Inventory has been sold, and the equipment revaluation as of the start of the third year is $30,000 (2 x 6,000) = $18,000. (O) Depreciation expense Equipment, net b. (R) Land Investment in Samson 6,000 6,000
80,000 80,000
Inventory has been sold, and the equipment revaluation has been completely written off. Therefore no eliminating entry (O) is appropriate. c. No eliminating entries are necessary to recognize or write off the revaluations, because the assets requiring revaluation have been either sold or written off. E4.9 Identifiable Intangibles and Goodwill, U.S. GAAP $2,000,000/4 $6,000,000/5 $ 500,000 1,200,000 $1,700,000
Amortization expense for 2011: Customer relationships Favorable leaseholds Total Impairment testing identifiable intangibles:
Customer relationships Book value = $2,000,000 2 x ($2,000,000/4) = $1,000,000 Book value > Sum of undiscounted cash flows? $1,000,000 > $800,000: Yes Impairment loss = $1,000,000 - $650,000 = $350,000 Favorable leaseholds Book value = $6,000,000 1.5 x ($6,000,000/5) = $4,200,000 Book value > Sum of undiscounted cash flows? $4,200,000 < $4,500,000: No
Brand names Book value = $14,000,000 Book value > Sum of undiscounted cash flows? $14,000,000 > $12,000,000: Yes Impairment loss = $14,000,000 - $10,000,000 = $4,000,000 Impairment testing Goodwill: Reporting Unit
Asia South America Europe
Fair Value of GW
GW impairment loss
Summary: Amortization expense identifiable intangibles Impairment losses identifiable intangibles Goodwill impairment loss Total E4.10 Identifiable Intangibles and Goodwill, IFRS Amortization expense for 2011: Customer relationships Favorable leaseholds Total Impairment testing identifiable intangibles: $2,000,000/4 $6,000,000/5
Customer relationships Book value = $2,000,000 2 x ($2,000,000/4) = $1,000,000 Book value > Sum of discounted cash flows? $1,000,000 > $650,000: Yes Impairment loss = $1,000,000 - $650,000 = $350,000 Favorable leaseholds Book value = $6,000,000 1.5 x ($6,000,000/5) = $4,200,000 Book value > Sum of discounted cash flows? $4,200,000 > $3,800,000: Yes Impairment loss = $4,200,000 $3,800,000 = $400,000 Brand names Book value = $14,000,000 Book value > Sum of discounted cash flows? $14,000,000 > $10,000,000: Yes Impairment loss = $14,000,000 - $10,000,000 = $4,000,000
GW impairment loss
$100,000,000 90,000,000 = $10,000,000 $130,000,000 125,000,000 = $5,000,000 $220,000,000 180,000,000 = $40,000,000 $300,000,000 190,000,000 = $110,000,000; impairment limited to full goodwill balance of $100,000,000.
Summary: Amortization expense identifiable intangibles Impairment losses identifiable intangibles Goodwill impairment loss Total E4.11 Consolidated Income Statement a. (amounts in millions) Sales $5,000 + 2,000 Cost of goods sold $3,000 + 800 + 160 Gross margin Depreciation expense $500 + 140 (200/10) Interest expense $100 + 60 + (100/5) Other expenses $600 + 700 Total operating expenses Net income
b. Parson reports its own income of $800 million plus its equity in the income of Soaper of $140 million. Equity in the income of Soaper is Soapers reported income adjusted for write-offs of Soapers net asset revaluations. Consolidated income is Parsons and Soapers reported revenues and expenses, with Soapers expenses adjusted for the revaluation writeoffs. Parsons separately reported income and consolidated income therefore report the same items, packaged differently.
E4.12 Amortization and Impairment Testing of Identifiable Intangible Assets a. Technology Arroyo WebEx Customer Relationships Arroyo WebEx Total amortization expense b. 7/31/07 Book value> Book Undiscounted value cash flows? $ 12,750 $12,750>$14,000? No 305,500 $305,500>$300,000? Yes $15,000/5 x 9/12 = $312,000/4 x 1/12 = $14,000/7 x 9/12 = $153,000/6 x 1/12 = $ 2,250 6,500 1,500 2,125 $ 12,375
Technology Arroyo WebEx Customer Relationships Arroyo WebEx Total impairment loss c.
-$150,875-100,000=
-50,875 $106,375
PROBLEMS P4.1 a. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements One Year after Acquisition Calculation of Equity in net income for 2010: $ 5,000,000 (2,000,000) (1,000,000) (375,000) 100,000 (400,000) $ 1,325,000
Santos reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Inventory (1) Plant assets $8,000,000/8 Patents $1,500,000/4 Long-term debt $1,000,000/10 Goodwill impairment loss Equity in net income of Santo
(1) Santos beginning inventory on its own books is $3,000,000 (= $5,200,000 + 4,000,000 6,200,000). Since Santos cost of goods sold is $4,000,000, its beginning inventory is completely sold in 2010, and the revaluation is written off. b. Consolidation Working Paper, December 31, 2010
Trial Balances Taken From Books Dr (Cr)
Eliminations
Consolidated
Ponon
Cash and receivables Inventory Plant assets, net Investment in Santo Patents Goodwill Current liabilities Long-term debt Capital stock Retained earnings, Jan. 1 Sales Equity in income of Santos Cost of goods sold Depreciation and amortization expense Interest and other expenses GW impairment loss $ 4,500,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 26,325,000 $
Santo
3,100,000 5,200,000 12,000,000 --
Dr
(R) 2,000,000 (R) 8,000,000
Cr
2,000,000 (O-1) 1,000,000 (O-2) 1,325,000 (C) 10,000,000 (E) 15,000,000 (R) 375,000 (O-3) 400,000 (O-5) 1,000,000 (R)
Balances
$ 7,600,000 10,200,000 27,000,000 --
(R) 1,500,000 (R) 4,500,000 (O-4) 100,000 (E) 6,000,000 (E) 4,000,000 (C) 1,325,000 (O-1) 2,000,000 (O-2) 1,000,000 (O-3) 375,000
1,125,000 4,100,000 (7,100,000) (24,200,000) (8,000,000) (4,800,000) (43,200,000) -24,000,000 6,575,000 6,300,000 400,000 $ -0-
5,400,000 --0- $
c. Consolidated Statement of Income and Retained Earnings For the Year 2010 Sales $ 43,200,000 Costs of goods sold (24,000,000) Gross margin 19,200,000 Operating expenses: Depreciation and amortization expense $ 6,575,000 Interest and other expenses 6,300,000 Goodwill impairment loss 400,000 (13,275,000) Net income 5,925,000 Retained earnings, beginning balance 4,800,000 Retained earnings, ending balance $ 10,725,000 Consolidated Balance Sheet, December 31, 2010 Assets Cash and receivables Inventory Plant assets, net Patents Goodwill Total assets Liabilities and stockholders equity Current liabilities Long-term debt Capital stock Retained earnings Total liabilities and stockholders equity P4.2 a.
$ 7,600,000 10,200,000 27,000,000 1,125,000 4,100,000 $ 50,025,000 $ 7,100,000 24,200,000 8,000,000 10,725,000 $ 50,025,000
Equity Method and Eliminating Entries Three Years after Acquisition Calculation of Equity in Net Income for 2012: $ 130,000 10,000 (15,000) $ 125,000
Sea Coasts reported net income for 2012 Revaluation writeoffs: Plant assets ($100,000)/10 Identifiable intangibles $300,000/20 Equity in net income of Sea Coast
b.
Calculation of Investment balance at December 31, 2012: $ 2,000,000 400,000 (240,000) 30,000 (45,000) $ 2,145,000
Investment in Sea Coast, December 31, 2009 Sea Coasts reported income, 2010-2012 Sea Coasts reported dividends, 2010-2012 (60% of reported income) Revaluation writeoffs, 2010-2012: Plant assets [($100,000)/10] x 3 Identifiable intangibles ($300,000/20) x 3 Investment in Sea Coast, December 31, 2012
Note to instructor: Under LIFO and increasing inventory, the acquisition date revalued inventory is assumed to still be on hand. c. Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2012: 125,000 Dividends Sea Coast (.6 x $130,000) Investment in Sea Coast (E) Stockholders equitySea Coast, 1/1 Investment in Sea Coast 1,508,000 Sea Coasts stockholders equity, December 31, 2009 = $1,400,000 (acquisition cost $2,000,000 less excess over book value $600,000). Sea Coasts stockholders equity, January 1, 2012 = $1,400,000 + (1 - .6)(400,000 130,000) = $1,508,000. (R) Inventory Identifiable intangibles 400,000 270,000 78,000 47,000
1,508,000
Plant assets, net 80,000 Investment in Sea Coast 590,000 Revaluations at January 1, 2012 = original revaluations less writeoffs for 2010 and 2011.
(O) Plant assets, net Amortization expense Depreciation expense Identifiable intangibles
d. Pelicans income from its own operations plus equity in net income of Sea Coast = consolidated net income: $500,000 + $125,000 = $625,000. P4.3 Consolidation at End of First Year, Preacquisition Contingency $ 500,000 (48,000) (20,000) $ 432,000 4,000,000 50,000 100,000 Cash Investment in Sanders Equity in net income of Sanders Cash Investment in Sanders b. Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2011: 150,000 150,000 432,000 432,000 4,150,000
a. Calculation of Equity in Net Income for 2011: Sanders reported net income for 2011 Revaluation writeoffs: Inventory $80,000 x 60% Equipment $200,000/10 Equity in net income of Sanders Perkinsentries for 2011: Investment in Sanders Merger expenses Restructuring expenses
(C) Equity in net income of Sanders Dividends Sanders Investment in Sanders (E) Stockholders equity Sanders, 1/1 Investment in Sanders
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2010 82
2,200,000 2,200,000
(R) Inventory Equipment, net In-process research and development Goodwill Lawsuit liability Investment in Sanders
Note: Because the change in the lawsuit liability occurs within the measurement period, the increased liability value increases acquisition date goodwill. (O) Cost of goods sold Depreciation expense Inventory Equipment, net P4.4 48,000 20,000 48,000 20,000
Consolidated Balance Sheet Working Paper, Bargain Purchase (see related P3.4)
(all amounts in millions) a. Calculation of Equity in Net Income for 2013: $ 345 (100) 50 (15) (22) $ 258
Saxons reported net income for 2013 ($10,000 + 10 8,000 40 25 1,600) Revaluation writeoffs: Inventory Marketable securities Buildings and equipment $300/20 Long-term debt $110/5 Equity in net income of Saxon Calculation of Investment balance, December 31, 2013: Investment balance, December 31, 2012 (1) Equity in net income for 2013 Dividends for 2013 Investment balance, December 31, 2013 (1)
Paxon acquired Saxon for $1,800, but there is a bargain gain that increases the investment balance by $200, as follows:
Calculation of gain on acquisition: Acquisition cost Book value ($100 + 350 + 845) Excess of acquisition cost over book value Excess of fair value over book value: Inventory Marketable securities Land Buildings and equipment Long-term debt (discount) Gain on acquisition Therefore Paxons entry to record the acquisition was: Investment in Saxon Cash Gain on acquisition b. Consolidation Working Paper, December 31, 2013
Trial Balances Taken From Books Dr (Cr)
705 $ 200
Eliminations
Consolidated
Paxon
Cash and receivables Inventory Marketable securities Investment in Saxon Land Buildings and equipment, net Current liabilities Long-term debt Common stock Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings, Jan. 1 Dividends Sales revenue Equity in income of Saxon Gain on sale of securities Cost of goods sold Depreciation expense Interest expense Other operating expenses $ 3,100 2,260 -2,158 650 3,600 (2,020) (5,000) (500) (1,200) (2,610) 500 (30,000) (258) -26,000 300 250 2,770 $ -0-
Saxon
$ 800 940 ---
Dr
(R) 100 (O-2) 50
Cr
100 (O-1) 50 (R) 158 (C) 1,295 (E) 705 (R) 15 (O-3) 22 (O-4)
Balances
$ 3,900 3,200 --1,195 5,035 (3,220) (5,362) (500) (1,200) (2,610) 500 (40,000) -(60) 34,100 355 297 4,370 $ -0-
300 1,150 (1,200) (450) (100) (350) (845) 100 (10,000) -(10) 8,000 40 25 1,600 $ -0-
(R) 245 (R) 300 (R) 110 (E) 100 (E) 350 (E) 845 (C) 258
100
(C)
_______ $ 2,495
c. Consolidated Statement of Income and Retained Earnings For the Year 2013 Sales $ 40,000 Costs of goods sold (34,100) Gross margin 5,900 Operating expenses: Depreciation expense $ 355 Interest expense 297 Other operating expenses 4,370 (5,022) Income before other gains 878 Gain on sale of securities 60 Net income 938 Retained earnings, January 1 2,610 Dividends (500) Retained earnings, December 31 $ 3,048 Consolidated Balance Sheet, December 31, 2013 Assets Cash and receivables Inventory Land Buildings and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and stockholders equity Current liabilities Long-term debt Common stock Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Total liabilities and stockholders equity P4.5 a. Identifiable assets acquired Liabilities assumed Net identifiable assets acquired Total acquisition cost Total goodwill $ 53,000,000 (19,000,000) 34,000,000 50,000,000 $ 16,000,000 Goodwill Allocation and Impairment
$ 3,900 3,200 1,195 5,035 $ 13,330 $ 3,220 5,362 500 1,200 3,048 $ 13,330
Allocation to business units: Identifiable assets acquired Liabilities assumed Net assets assigned Fair value of reporting unit Less: Net assets assigned Increase in fair value Tentative allocation of goodwill Total tentative allocation is $20,000,000; goodwill to be assigned is $16,000,000. 20% reduction Allocation of goodwill b. Unit X $ 30,000,000 (12,000,000) $ 18,000,000 Unit X $ 24,000,000 (18,000,000) __ N/A___ 6,000,000 Unit Y $16,000,000 (5,000,000) $11,000,000 Unit Y $ 15,000,000 (11,000,000) ___N/A___ 4,000,000 Unit Z $ 7,000,000 (2,000,000) $ 5,000,000 Unit Z $ 10,000,000 (5,000,000) ___N/A___ 5,000,000 Total $ 53,000,000 (19,000,000) $ 34,000,000 Unit J $ 5,000,000 5,000,000
(1,200,000) $ 4,800,000
(800,000) $ 3,200,000
(1,000,000) $ 4,000,000
(1,000,000) $ 4,000,000
Step 1 of impairment test: Compare the fair value of each reporting unit at December 31, 2010 with its book value at that date. Unit X Unit Y Unit Z Unit J Fair value at December 31, 2010 $26,000,000 $ 12,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 63,000,000 Carrying amount at December 31, 2010 25,000,000 13,000,000 7,000,000 65,000,000 Difference $ 1,000,000 $(1,000,000) $(2,000,000) $(2,000,000) Preliminary conclusion Not impaired May be May be May be impaired impaired impaired
Step 2 of the impairment test: For those reporting units where goodwill may be impaired, calculate the implied fair value of goodwill at December 31, 2010 and compare to the carrying amount of goodwill at that date. Unit Y Unit Z Unit J Fair value of reporting unit $ 12,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $63,000,000 Fair value of identifiable net assets at December 31, 2010 7,000,000 4,000,000 58,000,000 Implied value of goodwill 5,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Carrying amount of goodwill 3,200,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Difference $ 1,800,000 $(3,000,000) $ 1,000,000 Conclusion Goodwill is not Goodwill is Goodwill is not impaired impaired impaired Goodwill is impaired for Reporting Unit Z. A $3,000,000 goodwill impairment loss should be recorded at December 31, 2010.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2010 86
P4.6
2013 amortization expense: Customer lists $500,000/5 Developed technology $800,000/10 Total 2013 impairment test for identifiable intangibles: Customer lists $ 500,000 (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) $ 200,000 Developed technology $ 800,000 (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) $ 560,000 Internet domain name $ 1,300,000 ________ $ 1,300,000 $ 100,000 80,000 $ 180,000
Original carrying amount Less: amortization 2011 2012 2013 Carrying amount, December 31, 2013
Step 1 of impairment test: To determine whether impairment has occurred, compare the undiscounted future cash flows from the asset to its carrying value. Customer Developed Internet lists technology domain name Future undiscounted cash flows $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 Carrying amount 200,000 560,000 1,300,000 Difference $ 50,000 $ (60,000) $ (300,000) Conclusion Not impaired Impaired Impaired Step 2 of impairment test: For intangibles that are deemed impaired in Step 1, calculate amount of impairment as the difference between discounted cash flows and carrying value. Developed Internet technology domain name Future discounted cash flows $ 420,000 $ 750,000 Carrying amount 560,000 1,300,000 Impairment $ 140,000 $ 550,000 2013 goodwill impairment test: Step 1 of impairment test: compare fair value of reporting unit at December 31, 2013 to the carrying amount of the unit at that date. Fair value of reporting unit $17,000,000 Carrying amount 18,500,000 Difference $(1,500,000) Conclusion: Goodwill may be impaired.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2010 87
Step 2 of impairment test: Calculate the implied fair value of goodwill at December 31, 2013 and compare to the carrying amount at that date. Fair value of reporting unit $ 17,000,000 Fair value of identifiable net assets 14,200,000 Implied fair value of goodwill 2,800,000 Carrying amount of goodwill 6,200,000 Difference $ (3,400,000) Conclusion: Goodwill impairment loss is $3,400,000. Summary: Amortization expense for 2013: Customer lists Developed technology Impairment write-offs for 2013: Developed technology Internet domain name Goodwill Total expense for 2013
$ 180,000
P4.7 Consolidated Balance Sheet Working Paper, Three Years after Acquisition related P3.2) (all amounts in millions) a. Calculation of Equity in Net Income for fiscal 2011, 2012, and 2013: 2011 $ 15 3 (2) 1 (1) _(2) $ 14 2012 $ (2) 3 (2) 1 (1) (2) _(3) $ (6) 2013 $ 12 (1) 3 (2) 1 (1) (4) _(2) $ 7
Saxons reported net income (loss) Revaluation writeoffs: Property, plant and equipment $(60)/20 Patents and trademarks $10/5 Long-term debt $(3)/3 Advanced technology $5/5 Customer lists impairment loss Goodwill impairment loss Equity in net income of Saxon (1) $12 = $900 800 88
Calculation of Investment balance, June 30, 2013: Investment balance, June 30, 2010 (adjusted to remove earnings contingency) Equity in net income for fiscal 2011 Equity in net income for fiscal 2012 Equity in net income for fiscal 2013 Increase in GOCs AOCI for fiscal 2011-2013 (= $5 3) Investment balance, June 30, 2013 b. Consolidation Working Paper, June 30, 2013
Trial Balances Taken From Books Dr. (Cr.)
Eliminations
Consolidated
ITI
Current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Identifiable intangible assets Investment in GOC Goodwill (1) Current liabilities Long-term liabilities Common stock Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings, July 1 Accumulated other comprehensive income Treasury stock Sales revenue Equity in income of Saxon Cost of goods sold Goodwill impairment loss Other operating expenses $ 232 600 1,100 127 -(175) (1,125) (22) (580) (118) (20) 8 (2,000) (7) 1,400 -580
GOC
$ 12 140 30 --(10) (105) (4) (60) 12 (5) 2 (900) -800 -88
Dr
(R) 5 (O-1) 3 (R) 6 (R) 3 (R) 23
Cr
54 (R)
Balances
$ 249 689 1,155 -81 (185) (1,230) (22) (580) (118) (20) 8 (2,900) -2,200 2 ____671 $ -0-
2 (O-2) 1 (O-4) 4 (O-5) 7 (C) 55 (E) 65 (R) 2 (O-6) 1 12 2 (R) (E) (E)
(C) 7 (O-6) 2 (O-2) 2 (O-4) 1 (O-5) 4 $ 209 $ 3 (O-1) 1 (O-3) _______ 209
(1) Acquisition-date goodwill is calculated as follows: Acquisition cost (adjusted) GOCs book value Excess of acquisition cost over book value Excess of fair value over book value: Inventory Property, plant and equipment Patents and trademarks Advanced technology Customer lists Long-term debt Goodwill
_(18) $ 88
c. Consolidated Statement of Income and Retained Earnings For Fiscal 2013 Sales revenue Costs of goods sold Gross margin Operating expenses: Goodwill impairment loss $ 2 Other operating expenses _671 Net income Retained earnings, beginning balance Retained earnings, ending balance Consolidated Balance Sheet, June 30, 2013 Assets Current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Identifiable intangible assets Goodwill Total assets Liabilities and stockholders equity Current liabilities Long-term liabilities Common stock Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income Treasury stock Total liabilities and stockholders equity
249 689 1,155 __81 $ 2,174 185 1,230 22 580 145 20 __(8) $ 2,174 $
P4.8
Working Paper Eliminating Entries, Partial Year Consolidation (see related P3.3) (all numbers in millions)
a. Calculation of Equity in net income for 2003: Pharmacias reported net income Revaluation writeoffs: Inventory Property, plant and equipment [$(317)/20] x [8.5/12] In-process research and development Developed technology rights $31,596/11 x (8.5/12) Long-term debt Other assets $(15,606)/10 x (8.5/12) Equity in net income of Pharmacia b. Consolidation working paper eliminating entries for 2003: 438 Investment in Pharmacia (E) Stockholders equityPharmacia, 4/16/03 Investment in Pharmacia (R) Inventory Long-term investments In-process R&D Developed technology rights Goodwill Property, plant and equipment Long-term debt Other assets Investment in Pharmacia 2,939 40 5,052 37,066 21,304
438
7,236 7,236
(O) Cost of goods sold Property, plant and equipment Impairment loss Amortization expense Long-term debt Other assets Inventory Depreciation expense In-process research and development Developed technology rights Interest expense Other operating expenses P4.9 a. BPs 2007 annual report states the following: Goodwill Impairment Testing, IFRS and U.S. GAAP
The future cash flows are usually adjusted for risks specific to the asset and discounted using a pre-tax discount rate of 11% (2006 10%). This discount rate is derived from the groups post-tax weighted average cost of capital. In some cases the groups pre-tax discount rate may be adjusted to account for political risk in the country where the asset is located.
Cash flows are adjusted for risk before they are discounted, thereby taking into consideration differences in the uncertainty of the business environment. Most likely the cash flows of Exploration and Production segment CGUs are more uncertain than those of Refining and Marketing, although the two segments are closely related. If the cash flows were not adjusted, the discount rate should be adjusted to reflect differences in risk.
b. Exploration and Production CGU UK US Rest of world Total Refining and Marketing CGU Refining Retail Lubricants and other Total Value in use $ 13,000 6,000 4,000 $ 23,000 Carrying value Impairment loss $ 1,557 None 1,938 None 4,880 $ 880 $ 8,375 Value in use $ 9,000 35,000 2,500 $ 46,500 Carrying value $ 1,114 6,144 2,840 $ 10,098 Impairment loss None None $ 340
Total goodwill impairment loss is $340 + 880 = $1,220 c. $2,840 2,140 = $700, suggesting a GW impairment loss of that amount. However, total goodwill allocated to the Rest of World CGU is $515. Therefore, the goodwill impairment loss is $515, and other assets of the CGU would be written down, based on appropriate impairment tests. d. U.S. GAAP requires goodwill to be assigned to reporting units, in this case Exploration and Production, and Refining and Marketing. Goodwill is then evaluated using a two-step test. Goodwill is tested for impairment only if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Because fair value is generally calculated using discounted cash flows, we assume it can be approximated by value in use. For both reporting units above, value in use significantly exceeds carrying value, so no impairment loss is reported. Because reporting units aggregate CGUs, it is likely that CGUs with carrying value greater than value in use will be offset by those with a value in use that is greater than carrying value when applying the first step for impairment testing under U.S. GAAP.
P4.10 Consolidation One and Two Years after Acquisition a. The investment cost under SFAS 141R amounts to $598,000,000 [= ($590,000,000 $15,000,000) + $23,000,000], and the $248,000,000 excess of acquisition cost over book value ($598,000,000 $350,000,000) is allocated as follows, with goodwill being the residual at the bottom: Excess of acquisition cost over book value Allocation to identifiable items: Inventories Identifiable intangibles (5-year life) In-process research and development (IPRD) Plant assets (20-year life, straight-line) Goodwill (unallocated balance) b. 2007 equity income accrual: $ 140,000,000 (12,000,000) (8,000,000) (2,500,000) (15,000,000) $ 102,500,000 $ 248,000,000 (30,000,000) (40,000,000) (60,000,000) (50,000,000) $ 68,000,000
Essexs reported net income Revaluation write-offs: FIFO inventory sold (.4 X $30,000,000) Amortization of identifiable intangibles ($40,000,000/5) Depreciation of plant assets ($50,000,000/20) Goodwill impairment Equity income accrual December 31, 2007 working paper eliminations: (C) Equity income accrual Dividends S (.55 x $140,000,000) Investment in S (E) Stockholders equity Essex, 1/25/07 Investment in S 350,000,000 102,500,000
77,000,000 25,500,000
350,000,000
(R) Inventories Identifiable intangibles In-process research and development Plant assets Goodwill Investment in S (O) Cost of goods sold Amortization expense Depreciation expense Goodwill impairment loss Inventories Identifiable intangibles Accumulated depreciation Goodwill c. 2008 equity income accrual:
30,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 68,000,000 248,000,000 12,000,000 8,000,000 2,500,000 15,000,000 12,000,000 8,000,000 2,500,000 15,000,000
Essexs reported net income Revaluation write-offs: Amortization of identifiable intangibles ($40,000,000/5) Depreciation of plant assets ($50,000,000/20) IPRD impairment Equity income accrual December 31, 2008, working paper eliminations: (C) Equity income accrual Dividends S (.55 x $160,000,000) Investment in S (E) Stockholders equity Essex, 1/1/08 (1) (1) Investment in S $350,000,000 + $140,000,000 - $77,000,000
413,000,000 413,000,000
(R) Inventories (.6 x $30,000,000) Identifiable intangibles In-process research and development Plant assets Goodwill Accum. depreciation Investment in S (O) Amortization expense Depreciation expense IPRD impairment loss Identifiable intangibles Accumulated depreciation IPRD P4.11 Intangibles under IFRS a. Whereas the double-declining balance rate is twice the straight-line rate, 150% declining balance is 1.5 x 10% straight-line rate, or 15%. Following the conventional declining-balance calculations, we have this amount of amortization expense for 2011, the second year after acquisition: Amortization expense = .15 x [50,000,000 (.15 x 50,000,000)] = 6,375,000 b. At December 31, 2010, the carrying amount is 9,000,000 after 2010 amortization of 1,000,000, and the market value of these intangibles is 9,500,000. December 31, 2010 entries are: Amortization expense Intangible assets Intangible assets Revaluation surplus (OCI) 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 2,500,000 20,000,000 8,000,000 2,500,000 20,000,000 18,000,000 32,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 53,000,000 2,500,000 210,500,000
December 31, 2011, entries are: Amortization expense Intangible assets 9,500,000/9 = 1,055,555 Revaluation surplus (OCI) Loss Intangible assets 500,000 944,445 1,444,445 1,055,555 1,055,555
At this point the ending carrying amount is 7,000,000 (= 10,000,000 1,000,000 + 500,000 1,055,555 1,444,445], equal to the market value on that date. c. IFRS impairment loss = carrying amount greater of (value in use, 15,300,000; market value, 14,000,000) = 17,000,000 15,300,000 = 1,700,000. U.S. GAAP impairment loss = 0 (sum of undiscounted cash flows 18,000,000 > carrying amount, 17,000,000, indicating no impairment). The two-step test in U.S GAAP removes some potential impairments from consideration. IFRS goes immediately to an amount lower than the sum of the undiscounted cash flows, and will likely recognize more impairment losses over time than U.S. GAAP. P4.12 Consolidation in First Year, Intangible Asset Issues (all dollar amounts in millions) a. Net Assets $26,900 Liabilities Liabilities b. Going by the book, the question is simply whether useful lives can be reasonably estimated or whether the intangible has an obviously very long indeterminate (indefinite) life. Many cases will be clear-cut and can be justified to the auditors but others will be in gray areas such that the desired reporting result will call forth the case justifying the classification of the intangible one way or another. = = = = Assets - Liabilities $(20,800 + 9,400 + 4,800) Liabilities $35,000 $26,900 $8,100
In these gray areas, management may elect to minimize periodic amortization charges against earnings and take their chances on the somewhat random and very subjective impairment tests. To the extent possible, management would likely classify items and load cost in the indefinite-lived category to minimize the effect on earnings. c. With goodwill no longer being subject to amortization, and impairment charges being part of income from continuing operations, companies may seek to lower the probability that they will have to recognize goodwill impairment charges. The subjectivity inherent in valuing the reporting units to which the goodwill is assignedcash flow forecasts and discount rate selections facilitates decisions to load goodwill onto reporting units that are less-likely impairment candidates, i.e., units with fair value significantly above carrying value. d. Revaluation of limited-life intangibles is $2,000 (= $3,000 $1,000). Amortization of this revaluation for 2007 = $2,000/15 x 9/12 = $100. Equity method income = $1,000 $100 = $900 Consolidation Working Paper Entries: (C) Equity income DividendsCaremark Investment in Caremark (E) Stockholders equityCaremark (1) (1) Investment in Caremark $26,900 $20,800 ($9,400 $5,000) 20,800 2,000 2,400 Investment in Caremark (2) $6,400 $4,000 100 Identifiable intangibles, limited life 100 (O) Amortization expense 25,200 1,700 1,700 900 550 350
(R) Goodwill Identifiable intangibles, limited life Identifiable intangibles, indefinite life (2)