Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ultural Memory
in
the
resent
Mieke Bal and Hent de Vries, Editors
THE ANTIGONE COMPLEX
Ethics and the Invention of Feminine Desire
Cecilia Sjholm
sraxioio uxi viisi r\ iiiss
sraxioio, caii ioixi a
:cc
Stanford University Press
Stanford, California
:cc by the Board of Trustees of the
Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved.
No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any
information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of
Stanford University Press.
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Sjholm, Cecilia.
The Antigone complex : ethics and the invention of feminine desire /
Cecilia Sjholm.
p. cm.(Cultural memory in the present)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
isnx c-c;-,:-o (alk. paper)
:. Feminist ethics. :. Desire (Philosophy) ,. Femininity (Philosophy)
. Antigone (Greek mythology) I. Title. II. Series.
n;:,,, .s,; :cc
:;c.:dc::
:cc,c:occ:
Original Printing :cc
Last gure below indicates year of this printing:
:, :: :: :c c, c c; co c, c
Contents
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction xi
: Morality and the Invention of Feminine Desire :
: Sexuality Versus Recognition: Feminine Desire
in the Ethical Order :
, The Purest Poem . . . : Heideggers Antigone ,o
From Oedipus to Antigone: Revisiting the Question
of Feminine Desire :
, Family Politics/Family Ethics: Butler, Lacan, and
the Thing beyond the Object :::
Notes 1,,
Bibliography 1,,
Index :v,
Acknowledgments
Many people have participated in the intellectual work leading to the
completion of this book. I do not have space to list them all, but where
names would be too abundant, I would at least like to point to the con-
texts and places that have served as an inspiration. First of all I would like
to thank the institutions that have generously contributed research fund-
ing: FRN or the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Institute, and the
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. The Center for Theoretical Stud-
ies at Essex University, where I have spent a lot of time as a visiting fellow
throughout my writing of this project, proved an extraordinarily fruitful
place to pursue research of this kind. I am particularly grateful to Noreen
Harburt for having lent me her ofce. The Philosophy Department at De-
Paul University had the kindness to invite me as a visiting professor in
:,,,,. The graduate course on Lacan that I gave there, and the response
by the graduate students who attended, was crucial to the development of
the project.
The response from audiences to whom I have had the chance to
present this material has been of great importance: the University of Essex,
University of Memphis, University of Michigan, Middlesex University, the
New School of Social Research, Universit de Louvaine, Katholieke Uni-
versiteit Nijmegen, University of Gothenburg, University of Stockholm,
South Stockholm University College, and the Universit de Toulouse. I
would particularly like to thank those who invited me to present the ma-
terial: Sara Beardsworth, Peg Birmingham, Fabienne Brugure, Eva-Lena
Dahl, Bernard Flynn, Philippe van Haute, Peter Osborne, Renata Salecl,
Stella Sandford, and Slavoj Z
izek points out that Lacans analysis of the word ate indicates a cru-
cial difference between fantasy space and the real. What lies beyond ate is the fan-
tasmatic transformation of the impossible into the prohibited. The absolute de-
marcation indicated by the limit of ate does not move. Incest is such a limit; even
if someone was to perform an act of incest, desire would still be structured around
the impossibility of having the mother/father as object: other objects are made
possible because of this impossibility/castration. Z
izek
(:ccc, :,:,,).
:,. Butler (:ccc, ,).
:. Butler (:ccc, ,c).
:,. This is also why Butler is critical of feminist psychoanalysts who would ar-
gue for the idea that psychoanalysis only sketches positions of desire and do not
argue for xed sexual identities. Butler (:ccc, :,).
:o. Butlers critique echoes that of Beauvoir: paternal power is nothing but a
social construction, and psychoanalysis depends on that construction through a
collapse between social and symbolic analysis. Beauvoir (:,,, :); Butler (:ccc,
::).
:;. Butler (:ccc, ;:).
:. Butler, Laclau, Z
izeks interest in the Real stems from the fact that it is an internal limit to
the symbolic system. He has emphasized sexual difference as the epitome of a La-
canian Real for this reason, although the interpretation of sexual difference is also
open to hegemonic struggles. Butler, Laclau, Z