Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Drug Regulations
Drug Regulations
Changed Paradigm
Past:
Q9
Drug Regulations
Quality must be mainly built in and it will not improve by additional testing and inspection Better utilization of modern science throughout product lifecycle QRM is a key enabler throughout product lifecycle Robust PQS, with appropriate knowledge management, assures quality throughout product life cycle An integrated approach to development, manufacturing and quality for both industry and regulators
2.
3. 4.
5.
Drug Regulations
Such a systematic approach can enhance achieving the desired quality of the product and help the regulators to better understand a companys strategy. Product and process understanding can be updated with the knowledge gained over the product lifecycle.
Drug Regulations
Quality
The suitability of either a drug substance or a drug product for its intended use. This term includes such attributes as the identity, strength, and purity (ICH Q6A)
Quality by Design
A systematic approach to development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk management
Drug Regulations
In all cases sufficient development has to be done, so that a product can be released to the market
Defining Quality Target Product Profile Identifying critical quality attributes of the drug product Determining quality attributes of the starting materials (drug substance, excipients) Selecting an appropriate manufacturing process Defining a control strategy
Drug Regulations
Systematic approach to development Begins with predefined objectives Emphasizes product and process understanding and process control Based on sound science and quality risk management
Drug Regulations
10
Drug Regulations
11
Quality Target product profile Determine critical quality attributes (CQAs) Risk assessment: Link raw material attributes and process parameters to CQAs Develop a design space.(Optional not required) Design and implement a control strategy Manage product lifecycle, including continual improvement
Drug Regulations 12
Risk assessment
Development
EXAMPLE
Phase 1
Risk-based classification
(Risk Evaluation)
CONTROL STRATEGY
Phase 3
EFPIA PAT TG, 2006
July 2006, slide 13
prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance
Launch
Developm.
Drug substance properties; prior knowledge Proposed formulation and manufacturing process Research
Process Development
Describes systematic processes for the assessment, control, communication and review of quality risks Applies over product lifecycle: development, manufacturing and distribution Includes principles, methodologies and examples of tools for quality risk management Assessment of risk to quality should:
Be based on scientific knowledge Link to the protection of the patient Extend over the lifecycle of the product
Drug Regulations
15
Definition
Regulatory flexibility
Important to note
The multidimensional combination and interaction of input variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality Working within the design space is not considered a change
Design space is proposed by the applicant and is subject to regulatory assessment and approval
Drug Regulations
16
Consider QTPP in establishing the Design Space Initial determination of CQAs Assess prior knowledge to understand variables and their impact Perform initial risk assessment of manufacturing process relative to CQAs to identify the high risk manufacturing steps (->CPPs) Conduct Design of Experiments (DoE) Evaluate experimental data Conduct additional experiments/analyses as needed
Drug Regulations 17
First-principles approach
Combination of experimental data and mechanistic knowledge of chemistry, physics, and engineering to model and predict performance
Drug Regulations
18
100.0 95.0 90.0 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 40
Dissolution (%)
Surface Plot
Contour Plot
1.2 1 0.8
2 50 ram ete r1
Design Space
(non-linear) Design Space
40 42 44 46 (linear ranges) 48 50 52 54 Parameter 1 56
Pa
60 0
er et am ar
Design space proposed by the applicant Design space can be described as a mathematical function or simple parameter range Operation within design space will result in a product meeting the defined quality attributes
Drug Regulations 19
derived from current product and process understanding, that assures process performance and product quality. parameters and attributes related to
drug substance, drug product materials , components, facility , equipment operating conditions, in-process controls, finished product specifications, and the associated methods and frequency of monitoring and control (ICH 10).
Drug Regulations 20
Process
Process Variability
21
Readily achieved as
Continual Improvement
part of routine feedback Require permanent & substantial process/facility design to improve original concept
Feed Forward
Feedback
Drug Regulations
slide 22
Minimal Approaches Mainly empirical Developmental research often conducted one variable at a Time
Enhanced, Quality by Design Approaches Systematic, relating mechanistic understanding of material attributes and process parameters to drug product CQAs Multivariate experiments to understand product and process Establishment of design space PAT tools utilised
Drug Regulations
23
Process flow:
Characterization range
Acceptable range
Operating range
Screening
Optimization Finding interactions of parameters Defining models Validation Identification of CPP Identification of noise factors Process/ product Development:
Robust Cost effective Feasible
Set point
Production
Drug Regulations
24
Minimal Approaches Fixed Validation primarily based on initial fullscale batches Focus on optimisation and reproducibility
Enhanced, Quality by Design Approaches Adjustable within design space Lifecycle approach to validation and, ideally, continuous process verification Focus on control strategy and robustness Use of statistical process control methods
Drug Regulations
25
Minimal Approaches In-process tests primarily for go/no go decisions Off-line analysis
Enhanced, Quality by Design Approaches PAT tools utilised with appropriate feed forward and feedback controls Process operations tracked and trended to Support continual improvement efforts postapproval Part of the overall quality control strategy Based on desired product performance with relevant supportive data
Drug Regulations 26
Product Specifications
Minimal Approaches
Drug product quality Drug product quality controlled primarily ensured by risk-based by intermediates (in control strategy for well process materials) understood product and and end product process testing Quality controls shifted upstream, with the possibility of real-time release testing or reduced end-product testing Reactive (i.e., problem solving and corrective action) Preventive action Continual improvement facilitated
Lifecycle Management
Drug Regulations
27
Drug Regulations
28
Why QbD?
Higher level of assurance of product quality for patient
o Improved product and process design and understanding
o Quality risk management in manufacturing
Why QbD?
Depending on the level of development (scientific understanding) achieved and an adapted quality system in place, opportunities exist to develop more flexible regulatory approaches, for example, to facilitate: Risk-based regulatory decisions (reviews and inspections); Manufacturing process improvements, within the approved design space described in the dossier, without further regulatory review; Reduction of post-approval submissions; Real-time release testing, leading to a reduction of end product release testing.
Drug Regulations
30
Culture challenges
Business Challenges
Move from prescriptive approach More sharing of scientific and risk information Business justification Management Support Budgeting silos across business units Collaboration between functions Experience with new concepts Workload and resource limitations
Implementation Challenges
Drug Regulations
31
The development approach should be adapted based on the complexity and specificity of product and process. FDA encourages applicants are encouraged to contact regulatory authorities regarding questions related to specific information to be included in their application. Using the Quality by Design (QbD) approach does not change regional regulatory requirements but can provide opportunities for more flexible approaches to meet them. In all cases, good manufacturing practice (GMP) compliance is expected.
Drug Regulations
32
Product Profile
CQAs
Risk Assessments
Design Space