Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation Criteria
Content Organization and coherence Materials
1. Intellectual curiosity
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Questionnaire for graduates Instrument: Questions in questionnaire Activity: Yearly student questionnaire Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Evaluation Criteria
The student will have intellectual curiosity and capacity for independent study
Activity: Oral presentation of topic assigned for independent study (CCOM 3030, Fall 2011) Instrument: Rubric
Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students are competent as defined in the rubric Findings: Instead of an oral presentation the students did a written report. 90% (19/21) of the students that completed the report were competent as defined in the rubric. The goal was met (70% or more) Expected outcomes: At least 70% will answer that the independent studies improved the capacity of continuous learning Findings: The questionnaire has not yet been sent Expected outcomes: At least 30% of the third and fourth year students have a research experience Findings: 67% (18/27) of the third and fourth year students have a research experience. The goal was met (30% or more) Expected outcomes: Each of the students that have worked on research for at least a year have given a research presentation Findings: The Department is still collecting the information. Expected outcomes: At least 70% will answer that they have participated or are interested to participate in a research project Findings: 87% (47/54) of the students answered that that they have participated or are interested to participate in a research project. The goal was met (70% or more) Expected outcomes: At least 30% of the third and fourth year students have a research experience. Findings: Findings: 67% (18/27) of the third and fourth
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Questionnaire for graduates Instrument: Questions in questionnaire Activity: Yearly student questionnaire Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
Answer to a question regarding how the independent studies improved the capacity of continuous learning Number of students participating on research
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The student will understand and have curiosity towards research in computer science
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Evaluation Criteria
The student will have the ability to communicate effectively orally and in writing in Spanish and English The student will display an ethical conduct in the course of their studies and their profession, as well as attitudes that honor and enhance the profession.
Activity: Oral presentation of topic assigned (CCOM 3982, Spring 2012) Instrument: Rubric Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the beginning of the course (CCOM 3981, Fall 2011) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
Expected outcomes: Each of the students that have worked on research for at least a year has given a research presentation. Findings: The Department is still collecting the information. Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students are competent as defined in the rubric. Findings: 84% (27/32) of the students are competent as defined in the rubric. The goal was met (70% or more) Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: 55% (11/20) of the students that answered the questionnaire on CCOM 3981, Sect. 001, were competent as defined in the rubric. We expected less than 50% of the students to be competent. This was baseline data to be compared with the outcome at the end of the semester. Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: Most of the students (more than 50%) showed a good attitude towards social responsibility and academic honesty. However, it was not clear for them what constitute plagiarism. We expected less than 50% of the students to be competent. This was baseline data to be compared with the outcome at the end of the semester. Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: We considered that the questionnaire prepared by the College of General Studies was not appropriated to compare the results obtained as baseline data and it was not given to the students.
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Group discussion with open ended questions (CCOM 3981, Fall 2011) Instrument: Notes on students opinions
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the end of the course prepared by the College of General Studies (CCOM 3981) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
A new instrument will be designed and the domain will be measured again in Fall 2012.
Evaluation Criteria
Answers to questions on ethics
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students will there is no need to take actions at this time. have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: 93% (50/54) of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics. The goal was met (70% or more) Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students are competent as defined in the rubric Findings: 80% (8/10) of the students that completed that turned in the project are competent as defined in the rubric. Five students did not turned in the project but 4 of these failed the course. The goal was met (70% or more) Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students understand and appreciate the importance of diversity. Findings: 60% (18/30) of the students are competent as defined in the rubric. The goal was NOT met (70% or more). Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: 55% (11/20) of the students that answered the questionnaire on CCOM 3981, Sect. 001, were competent as defined in the rubric. We expected less than 50% of the students to be competent. This was baseline data to be compared with the outcome at the end of the semester. Expected outcomes: Less than 50% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: Most of the students (more than 50%) showed a good attitude towards social responsibility and academic honesty. However, it was not clear for them what constitute plagiarism. We expected less than 50% of the students to be competent. This was baseline data to be compared with the outcome at the end of the semester. Expected outcomes: At least 70% of the students will have a positive attitude towards ethics Findings: We considered that the questionnaire is not The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
6. Critical thinking
The student will demonstrate ability to identify, organize, evaluate, and use information.
Develop, correct and prove complex computer programs that use common algorithms to process numeric and alphabetic information. Answers to questions on diversity
Activity: End of semester questionnaire (CCOM 3981, Fall 2011) Instrument: Rubric
Most of the students do not understand the meaning of diversity and the social issues associated to it. A workshop on diversity will be included in CCOM 3981 starting in Fall 2012 and the Department will organize activities to develop appreciation towards diversity. The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The student will display an ethical conduct in the course of their studies and their profession, as well as attitudes that honor and enhance the profession.
Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the beginning of the course (CCOM 3981, Fall 2011) Instrument: Questions in questionnaire
Activity: Group discussion with open ended questions (CCOM 3981, Fall 2011) Instrument: Notes on students opinions
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
Activity: Questionnaire on ethics at the end of the course prepared by the College of General Studies
A new instrument will be designed and the domain will be measured again in Fall 2012.
Evaluation Criteria
Even though the results in the questionnaire were good, since At least 70% of the students will have a positive attitude last year the result were not so positive, the Department will towards ethics Findings: 93% (50/54) of the students will have a positive organize activities attitude towards ethics. The goal was met (70% or more)
II. Summary of Assessment carried out: In an additional sheet of paper, briefly describe the assessment activities undertaken, the assessment instruments used, how the instruments were developed, and how was the information collected analyzed. Please include the assessment instruments used. Discuss how the proposed transforming actions will be assessed. Appendices: Include the final version of Part I and II of the Plan of Assessment of Student Learning. If you have developed a table or a graph illustrating the results of the assessment findings, please include it. UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RO PIEDRAS CAMPUS PARCIAL REPORT OF ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING PART II - KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, OR ATITUDES OF THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR Academic Program or Major: ____ Bachelors in Computer Science___________________________
Knowledge, Skills or Attitudes of the Academic Program or Major Activities and instruments used to collect information (direct or indirect measures) Academic Year: 2011-2012, First Semester
Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation Criteria
Syntax errors, logic errors, program documentation, use of functions, use of decision structures, use of data structures. Be able to determine asymptotic expressions for the worst-case running time and space requirements of algorithms and data structures
1. Programming Skills
The Department will continue doing what has done so far; there is no need to take actions at this time.
The student will have the ability to develop, analyze and evaluate algorithms for solving problems or performing tasks.
The Department has to meet to discuss these results and decide the actions to be taken.
II. Summary of Assessment carried out: In an additional sheet of paper, briefly describe the assessment activities undertaken, the assessment instruments used, how the instruments were developed, and how was the information collected analyzed. Please include the assessment instruments used. Discuss how the proposed transforming actions will be assessed. Appendices: Include the final version of Part I and II of the Plan of Assessment of Student Learning. If you have developed a table illustrating the results of the assessment findings, please include it.